Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 301 through 330 (of 8,057 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: our reactions to the Chicago game #161365
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    What jolly good fun!

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well. Now we need 3 first downs.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Have we considered running the ball? Especially since Stafford is missing everyone by 15′, and the Bears can’t stop the run?

    45 plays so far. 11 rushes. WTF?

    I don’t think McVay should be reading this board during a game, but I’m glad he is.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Have we considered running the ball? Especially since Stafford is missing everyone by 15′, and the Bears can’t stop the run?

    45 plays so far. 11 rushes. WTF?

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It is 89 degrees here in Singapore, with a 22% chance of rain.

    Let’s get this done.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161340
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I think Seattle, LA, and SF might ALL be a little better next year. Picture ‘that.’

    Yep.

    AFAIK, none of the 3 teams are facing significant FA loss or attrition through retirement. So they all figure to be a year more experienced, and replenished with off season acquisitions.

    If the Eagles and Lions rebound, and the Bears fix their defense, it’s gonna be a spectacle.

    • This reply was modified 4 months, 1 week ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    • This reply was modified 4 months, 1 week ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161333
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So, the 49ers have all these injuries, but are they all coming back next year? Are they gonna be a force next year?

    I’m afraid I have to think that the answer to that is yes.

    They were a force this year with a staggering number of injuries to key players. And while I don’t watch them much at all outside Rams games, I do peek at them from time-to-time, and I hear a few samples of what the local radio sports dudes say when I’m in the car, and I just don’t think there was much “fluke” in their record this year. At some point you have to acknowledge that they aren’t over-achieving. You can’t simply win 12 games in the NFL, even against a last-place schedule, unless you’re really pretty good. That defense got the job done again and again without its 2 All-Pro players in Bosa and Warner, and without its #1 draft pick DL Mykal Williams. And the offense go the job done again and again without Trent Williams, Brock Purdy, Brandon Aiyuk, Ricky Pearsall, and George Kittle for some/most/all of the season.

    Christian McCaffrey played all season, though. I think he’s their MVP. In fact, there’s no doubt in my mind. McCaffrey is crucial to their offense. He put up HOF production levels this year, actually. I think he would be a slam dunk HOF guy if it weren’t for his injury history. He’s been hurt a lot, and the RB position has a short shelf life, as we all know. He’s played 9 years, although 3 of those were mostly washed out with injuries. Still, he has had 6 full seasons in which he’s stayed healthy, and he is clearly a force when he does so. He showed no signs of diminished or fading play this year, so I’m expecting him to be every bit as good next year.

    All of those guys will be ready to go in camp (except Aiyuk, who’s divorce from SF is inevitable). Trent Williams and Nick Bosa are the only two who will possibly be diminished players, but since they are both elite at their positions, being diminished is still better than most guys at their positions. And any hope that Brock Purdy was a lucky beginner whose shortcomings would be exposed is gone. The 9ers redeemed themselves from the Trey Lance disaster by getting a borderline pro bowl QB with the last pick in the draft. He’s going to be in SF for a long, long time.

    And how well they played this season is a reflection of outstanding coaching. They could well lose Salah, but it starts at the top. Shanahan is every bit as capable of managing an ongoing influx of coaches as McVay is. Both of these guys have replaced many coordinators in the 9 years they’ve been in the league, and I don’t think either one has failed to find a solid replacement. Shanahan was starting to have a few skeptics among the fan base after last year, but he’s put all that to rest by giving the fans here a very memorable season when they were completely demoralized after Bosa, then Warner were lost. They resigned themselves to a second consecutive miserable season, and Shanahan had them believing they could go all the way by the end, and with Kittle’s injury just adding an exclamation point to their season, the 49er faithful is pretty damn happy with this season, and will be all on board next year. And John Lynch has been a pretty good general manager. Their drafts have been pretty good, although their last 2 first round picks have been hurt a lot, and haven’t made waves. Yet.

    The 49ers are a really good football team, and they are going to be a problem next year. A big problem.

    • This reply was modified 4 months, 1 week ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161323
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Okay. Here we go. This clip from reddit has the entire sequence. After the review, they come back and show the replays again. At about 1:25, you see the angle I’m talking about.

    I’ve watched it a few times now, and I don’t think it is conclusive. But I think this angle makes it more INCONCLUSIVE, if that makes sense. From this angle, it appears to me that Cooks does get control, but not with the kind of “follow through” or “complete” control that one looks for in this case. I guess I’m saying that THIS angle makes me think that there isn’t enough there to overturn the referee’s ruling.

    [Highlight] McMillan rips the ball away from Brandin Cooks (replays)
    byu/Large_banana_hammock innfl

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161322
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That’s the shot I want to see again.

    If you find it, post it here. I’m curious myself.

    I cannot find it. I’ve been looking. It was AFTER the clip you have, and that clip is common,the one up to the ruling. But after that, once play resumed, they revisited it with 3 or 4 more clips, all but one of which we had seen before, but the first one was straight up the gut. They showed it only one time. That’s the one I want to see again a couple times. And I haven’t found it. It’ll turn up eventually, I think.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161318
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    None of those angles are the one I’m talking about. The angle that looked like he may not have had control was from – how do I say this? – from the QB’s angle. Straight up the field. That was the one that looked – on first viewing – like he had an “extra” bobble in there. That’s the shot I want to see again.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161314
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Let me just say that there is no way on god’s green earth that the Broncos can beat Houston with Jarrett Stidham at QB, a guy who hasn’t thrown a pass since 2023.

    I hope the Drew Maye magic can last one more game.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161313
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That play is at 2:01 in this vid. The difference is, AW had his hands on the ball too before the receiver fell, so it was a contested catch before AW grabbed control of it when they went down. In the Bills game, Cooks went down with the ball, uncontested, and then it got taken out of his hands.

    That’s what it looked like to me, too, except for the one angle they showed only once in which it looked like maybe the ball was slipping around before Cooks hit the turf. I want to see that again, but… it doesn’t much matter now, does it.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161310
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    seahawks look good.

    They do, but also the 49ers look like the team they should have been all season. Somehow they were playing for the #1 seed the last week of the season when they had lost Bosa, Warner, Kittle, Purdy, Aiyuk, Pearsall, Bethune, and 1st round draft choice Williams for large chunks if not the entire season, and just kept winning somehow.

    This day was bound to come.

    I was just hoping it was going to be next week at SoFi.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161305
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Bo Nix is out for the year.

    So whoever wins the NE/HOU game tomorrow is going to the Super Bowl.

    So… go New England?

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161298
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Meanwhile, the 49ers haven’t overcome the time zone difference.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161297
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The bounces favored Denver. (Refs too.)

    Yep. That INT was sketchy, though the one angle that might have supported the refs was shown only one time, and I couldn’t tell for sure.

    But…yeah… 5 turnovers was the game, certainly.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161295
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I do have a soft-spot for the Bills though. That team is cursed.

    Another gut-wrenching loss for Buffalo. Former Ram Brandin Cooks has the ball taken from him, and then former Ram Tre’Davious White commits a terrible DPI.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    it’ll come down to turnovers.

    and the running game. which defense is more effective stopping it or if one of the two abandon it.

    passing wise both defenses are gonna have problems. but again. can they get turnovers?

    I think it’s more important for the Rams to avoid turnovers than it is for them to get them. I’ll gladly take any and all, but if the Rams just mind their own business in this game, they will win. Chicago has more substantial weaknesses on defense, their offense is a notch below the Rams, and the Rams have greater Big Game experience.

    If the Rams take care of the ball, and the refs are finished punishing Puka, the Rams will survive this round.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Bears 27
    Rams 23

    Rams defense sucks.
    On the road.
    California team playing In the frigid-arctic tundra.
    Bears defense great at creating turnovers.
    Caleb has a QB-rating 17 points higher when he plays in Chicago.
    (7 game-winning 4th-quarter-drives in 2025.)

    w
    v

    I got no idea. Nothing would surprise me at this point, except a Bears’ blowout. I think the Rams will win because I think they’re better overall, but I expect the outcome to be in doubt until the waning moments. I’m not a bettor, but I wouldn’t have bet on the Rams to cover last week, and I wouldn’t bet on them to cover this week, either.

    Next week, though. When they play the 49ers, who will undoubtedly win today even though McCaffrey will break his ribs on the opening drive, I think that’s when the Rams cover and blow the doors off the 49ers.

    in reply to: playoffs, week 2, divisional round #161282
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’ve reluctantly found myself on the side of the 9ers in this one, only because it gives a home game to the Rams if they beat Chicago. But I realized no matter who wins, if Chicago beats the Rams, I will be hoping they win next week. So go 9ers. I guess.

    I think Seattle’s fate largely falls on Darnold, and the 9ers will need a big game from McCaffrey. Though it does seem like every playoff features a Bucky Dent or a Jaquiski Tartt.

    I guess I lean Denver because I gather they are more reliably vulnerable than a Buffalo team on a hot streak. IOW, I hear that the Bills have a higher ceiling than the Broncos. Dunno, though. I do not want Houston to advance, nor NE. So Denver it is over there for now.

    in reply to: Rams OL thread #161276
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    7 out of 60.

    Got it.

    Which leads me to ask, how many of the 12 wildcard week teams were top 10 in OL play during the season?

    Chicago, LAR, SF, Buffalo, Phil, Pitt. 6.

    How many were bottom 10?

    LAC, Houston, Jax.

    How many of the remaining 8 have top 10 OLs? Denver, Chicago, LAR, SF, Buffalo. 5.

    I have no idea what that tells us, if anything. It’s just the kind of question I like to ask.

    Well, let’s see…

    6 over 10 is 6/10, or 60% , multiplied by 5 = 300.

    So Matthew Stafford should pass for 300 yards behind that line. It’s just math.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i wonder if dotson will have some rust to knock off.

    Sure. Along with some ice from his beard.

    in reply to: Rams OL thread #161272
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Los Angeles Rams PR@TheLARamsPR
    Coleman Shelton finished with the 7th-highest Pass Blocking Grade (82.1) among all offensive linemen in Wild Card Weekend (min 80% snaps played), according to @PFF.

    Wild Card weekend = 12 teams x 5 OL = 60.

    7 out of 60.

    Got it.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The Ben Johnson/Matt LaFleur/McVay Coaching Tree stuff will not affect the progress and outcome of this game.

    Now, I know some of you guys are going to claim that it takes a month to acclimate to Disrespect and Trash Talk, but I think the Bears haven’t been “all that” since George Halas retired from coaching.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oak is the best common firewood in these parts. Oak is omnipresent. We have a lot of pine in the area – it’s often available for free in rounds just off”…

    Non-hierarchical List of good things:
    1 Rams
    2 Oaks
    3 Old sailing ships
    4 dogs
    5 crows

    w
    v
    “The end result is that each jay plants somewhere in the neighborhood of 3,360 oak trees every year of its seven-to 17-year life span! It’s no wonder that jays have enabled oaks to move about the earth faster than any other tree species.”

    Douglas W. Tallamy, The Nature of Oaks: The Rich Ecology of Our Most Essential Native Trees

    I have found that crows don’t burn well.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    All this talk of the cold is making me think I might light a fire in my stove Sunday morning so it will be a crisp 75 degrees in my TV room. Might even have a mug of hot cocoa just to tamp down on my empathy for the players.

    Burn sage in the wood stove.

    What kind of wood do you use out there in mid California?

    For me it’s oak, ash, and maple.

    Oak is the best common firewood in these parts. Oak is omnipresent. We have a lot of pine in the area – it’s often available for free in rounds just off the freeway – but pine isn’t worth the effort of splitting it, really, at least not if oak is available. I use it sometimes, but mostly when it happens to be available right when I’ve rented a splitter anyway, and need to round out my stacks. I have been burning elm for a decade because I had two giant elms that had to come down for safety purposes, and it was decent. I use manzanita, too.

    This year is the least amount of firewood I’ve used, so far. I’ve had a fire going maybe 3 or 4 days all season so far. We’ve had frost once all winter. We’ve had quite a good run of rainfall, but it’s been sunny and in the mid-60s for a week, with lows in the low 40s. The forecast is for more of the same for the rest of January with some clouds and showers here and there, but we’ve had colder Octobers than this.

    Maybe I’ll have a look for a sage smudge stick. Pretty sure we have one or two remnants around the house. I know Old Hacker used to recommend it. Might clear up some bad mojo around the playoffs, and balance out that -9 wind chill factor.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think all things being even the Rams beat the Bears, they’re the better team, but…the cold will be a factor.

    All this talk of the cold is making me think I might light a fire in my stove Sunday morning so it will be a crisp 75 degrees in my TV room. Might even have a mug of hot cocoa just to tamp down on my empathy for the players.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, all I know is, they wouldnt have this problem if the Rams had stayed
    in Cleveland.

    w
    v

    Or preserved a 16-point 4th quarter lead over Seattle.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Okay, but what ya’ll are skipping over is that it hasn’t been very cold in Chicago yet. Nobody in Chicago has had to knock ice crystals out of their beards since sometime in early 2025. So they’re maybe acclimatized to some highs in the 40s – which is cooler than the 60s or 70s, whatever it is in LA right now – but the first “frozen beard” day is this coming Saturday.

    They aren’t acclimated either.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    a lot of rams influencers/pundits are getting really defensive about the weather factor. i don’t understand why. it’s a factor. the rams play in la which has really mild weather. bears players play in these conditions. it’s an advantage. hopefully, the rams can overcome it.

    It hasn’t been as cold as it’s going to be on Sunday, so it’s going to be colder than the Bears are used to. And when it comes to that, Stafford has played in more cold weather games than Caleb Williams has. Williams is from SoCal as well, remember. And most of the football season, the Bears are playing in temperatures above freezing. It was 60 degrees in Chicago last Thursday, and 52 degrees the day before yesterday. I think they have a slight advantage in this respect, but Stafford, the RBs (Notre Dame and Michigan), and Davante Adams have all played in cold weather before. I think it will affect skill players more than the other guys, but I don’t think anybody ever “gets used to” 16 degrees. That’s effing cold.

    It’s supposed to be 36 degrees in Chicago tomorrow, and drops to 18 degrees on Saturday. I’m guessing the Rams will be there by then. So this is a fairly sudden and dramatic drop in temperature, and the Bears won’t be any more used to it that the Rams are. Not significantly, anyway.

    • This reply was modified 4 months, 2 weeks ago by Avatar photoZooey.
Viewing 30 posts - 301 through 330 (of 8,057 total)