Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipantNot funny. Though I hope I can get one much cheaper as a result. Amazing technology yet it couldn’t keep up with ever stringent EPA mandates. Won’t be limited to VW either.
I don’t think it’s because they COULDN’T keep up. It’s that it was cheaper to bypass the regulations.
=======================================
I wonder if any old-school ram fan,
back in the 70’s,
ever painted Horns on one of those
old classic VW bugs ?I can visualize somethin like that.
w
v
wvParticipantJohnny Hekker is well on his way to being the best in the game. His amazing 5.6 second hag time illustrates how high is booming punts blast into the sky.
Well, it’s only 2 typos.
Those aren’t typos, they are quantum tunneling. Te “n” ad te “h” ave all tueled to a differet reality.
=============================================
I dunno. “5.6 second hag-time.”
I thought it was some sort of new
football term.Like maybe it was “frightening” or scary
or somethin.w
v
==
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/haghag 1 (hăg)
n.
1. Offensive An old woman considered to be ugly or frightening.
2.
a. A witch; a sorceress.
b. Obsolete A female demon.
3. A hagfish.
[Middle English hagge, perhaps short for Old English hægtesse, witch.]hag 2 (hăg)
n. Chiefly British
1. A boggy area; a quagmire.
2. A spot in boggy land that is softer or more solid than the surrounding area.
3. A cutting in a peat bog.
[Middle English, gap, chasm, of Scandinavian origin; akin to Old Norse högg; see kau- in Indo-European roots.]
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition.
hag (hæɡ)September 25, 2015 at 6:48 pm in reply to: Feeling good about Sunday…the "will Rams beat Steelers" thread #31154
wvParticipantIs Ben-R one of the top Three QBs in the NFL?
Cosell said he’s no longer a ‘move QB’; he’s a
topnotch pocket QB now. He said his mental progression
has now caught up with his physical ability.So, Greg Williams D has to contend with
one of the best QBs,
one of the best RBs
and one of the best WRs.Good test.
Should be interesting.
I got no idea what’s gonna happen.
I may get to see this one on tv cause
Steeler games are often on wv-mom’s tv.What kind of food goes with a Steeler game?
What kind of food is Pittsburgh known for?I ate Seattle-related food and the Rams beat them.
I forgot to eat Washington-related food and they got stomped.
Do the math.w
v
wvParticipantCosell starts at the 3:11 mark.
If you listen to anything before that
you will risk losing brain cells.w
v
wvParticipantWell, I dunno. I think if you look at the Fisher years,
sure, they have been inconsistent, and they’ve had a lot of Young
players, and sometimes maybe they’ve been what Trent calls “immature”.But its also true that they’ve played a LOT of games with a no.2 or no.3 QB,
as we all know. And they didnt always have the talent on defense
they have right now. This is the first year I’ve looked up and down
their roster and thought to myself — this team is not talent-deficient
at key positions. I mean, they are as talented as the Seahawks now.
That just wasn’t the case in past years, imho.I guess my point is, THIS talented-version of the Rams
has only played TWO games. So…we’ll see if they are “Immature”.
I have to see more than one home game and one road game to say
much though.Thats just me though. I know others disagree. Let a thousand flowers bloom.
w
v
wvParticipantBruce Arians to team: ‘you aint shit’
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000537361/article/arians-message-to-20-cards-you-aint-bleep…Coach Bruce Arians was quick to dump cold water on all the premature praise aimed at his 2-0 Cardinals.
“You ain’t (bleep)!” Arians told his players at the start of Wednesday’s team meeting, according to quarterback Carson Palmer, via the team’s official website.
Arians went on tell his players they should be wary of the symbolic pats on the back they’ve received, saying critics and others are simply “looking for a soft spot where to stick the knife.”….
==========================
wvParticipant——————————
LaramI would run at them, run at them show them the run on dives, off tackle and some mis-direction, then I would do exactly what Arizona, San Diego, Giants and Cowboys did.
I would play action, max protect and hit them on intermediate to long routes. Williams will get impatient, get cute and they’re will be a breakdown…you can count on it.
In the AZ game last year when Palmer was in, he stood in the pocket and weathered the pass rush until he had to go out. When Stanton game in he did the exact same thing with his first pass being a 54 yd bomb for SIX to Brown.
The veteran Philip Rivers did the same thing. They ran it ran it then Philip stood in the pocket and beat everything Williams threw at him in max protect.
Same with Eli Manning!
Run at them to keep them off balance then max protect and hit them in play action.
That’s the way I play the Rams.
———————————-
wvParticipant“It’s definitely getting there,” Gurley said.
I dunno. That don’t sound like he’s quite ready.
And if there’s one thing we know about Fisher
its that he’s very patient.w
vSeptember 23, 2015 at 8:14 pm in reply to: Wagoner: Mike Tomlin sees greatness in Rams' Aaron Donald #31076
wvParticipantIs Tomlin the anti-Arians?
Is he some sort of nice-guy,
er somethin?w
vSeptember 23, 2015 at 11:50 am in reply to: Feeling good about Sunday…the "will Rams beat Steelers" thread #31053
wvParticipantI dunno. But i think they better.
w
v
wvParticipant———————————————-
Blue and Gold“…it is impressive empirically. All records have things that can be picked apart, when the Steelers had all those shutouts in the 1976 season, how many were against winning teams? Or were in the top half of the league offensively? I know the answer but you can look it up.
The point is the best 2-game stretch in allowing the fewest rushing yards in Rams history was in 2014.
The best 3-game stretch in allowing the fewest rushing yards in Rams history was in in 1965. The 2nd best was in 2014.
The best 4-game streches were in 1965 and then 2014
The best 5-game stretch in allowing the fewest rushing yards in Rams history was in 2014
The best 6-game stretch in allowing the fewest rushing yards in Rams history was in 2014, he 2nd best was 1968
The best 7-game was in 1967 and the next best was in 2014. (week 7 through 13)
This team, these players, this scheme CAN stop the run. The issue as I have outlined it is why they can be dominant for stretches and then give up three killers like Sunday, or on some of the other games where they just blow it.
wvParticipanthttp://www.post-gazette.com/sports/steelers
Post Gazette – Steelers==============
http://www.post-gazette.com/video/?v=4501775245001
Tomlin on Rams and stuff————
wvParticipantSteelers notebook: Bell to get a full workload
http://triblive.com/sports/steelers/9137774-74/tomlin-bell-game#axzz3mYZFlAUQ
By Mark Kaboly• There is going to be no easing Le’Veon Bell into Sunday’s game against the Rams. Steelers coach Mike Tomlin on Tuesday said Bell, who completed his two-game suspension Monday, won’t be held back in any way when it comes to practice or playing time, despite not playing in nearly a month. “I am going to play Le’Veon Bell,” Tomlin said. Tomlin still is unsure how the division of labor will go between Bell and DeAngeloWilliams but said he will defer to last year’s team MVP.
• Tomlin is just as impressed with Rams defensive tackle Aaron Donald’s work ethic as his athletic ability. Tomlin said he routinely ran into Donald in the early morning of the winter months at the South Side practice facility parking lot the Steelers share with Pitt. “The things that I know about him don’t help me sleep easy,” Tomlin said. “This guy is extremely talented, but he’s also a very hard worker. … I think that guy left the Pro Bowl and went straight back to work.” Donald, a Pitt and Penn Hills graduate, has 2½ sacks in two games. He had 11½ as a rookie.
• The Steelers became the first team since the 1997 Denver Broncos to go for a 2-point conversion (that wasn’t a fake extra point) in the first half of a game during Sunday’s win over the 49ers. Tomlin said there is no steadfast plan of when they will go for two early in games.
• CornerbackCortez Allen missed Sunday’s game with a sore knee, but Tomlin said the injury doesn’t appear to require surgery. The only other player with an injury of note is nose tackle Dan McCullers, who has swelling in his left knee. “That may limit him and affect his availability,” Tomlin said.
—
Read more: http://triblive.com/sports/steelers/9137774-74/tomlin-bell-steelers#ixzz3mYZWIMUj
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook
wvParticipantmaybe a little patience is needed. pitt game can’t come soon enough.
whatever it is they better get it sorted quick. can’t take half the season to fix it.=========================
Well, i think they kinda ‘can’ take half a season to fix it. I said earlier in the year, they need to be 3 and 3 after the first six games. Right now they are 1 and 1, of course.
To win Ten, i think they have to go .500 in the early part of the season. As opposed to, you know, 1 and 4, that sort of thing. Cant dig a big hole.I say all this because I ‘expect’ them to improve as the OLine gets more
experience and Foles and the receivers get to play more together,
and Gurley and maybe Quick come into-play.We’ll see though. Either I’m right, and they improve with experience,
or…they’ll be the SOSAFR.
Same Ole Sorry Ass Fisher-Rams.We dunno how good Washington is this year, btw.
Maybe they make the playoffs and Dallas and Philly dont.w
v
wvParticipantLa on the defense:
=====================================
LaramThey’re best run defense IMO was the second half of 2013.
They were shutdown stoppers because the played straight up fundamentally sound gap control.
Not this tricky, gimmicky Donald in pass coverage stuff.
There are just too many moving parys in a GW defense IMO.
It allows for more breakdowns and missed assignments IMO.
wvParticipant#9 Barnes +0.6
Barnes is the 9th ranked center according to PFF grades.
That’s interesting because all over the net during the summer there were people who complained that the Rams had no one at center. And it really was darn near universal. Turns out Barnes is top 10 so far. And that’s after playing Seattle’s tough 4/3 defense and then playing Washington’s Knighton, a tough 3/4 NG.
=======================
Well that is really funny.
Not ha ha funny. Just kinda surreal and disturbing
funny.Things will get better.
w
v
wvParticipantWell, every State has a little different system
for handling and managing their poor people.
In WV the public-defender’s case-loads are not as bad as
as in other States. Essentially though, his points
are accurate.He could have talked about Corporate-Capitalism though. The big
elephant in the room. I mean, one of things i notice all the time is
just who ISNT arrested. Cause of what ISNT illegal. Ya know.
Its illegal steal bread or sleep under the bridge — but it aint
illegal to frack the earth or blow up mountains for coal, etc, etc,
blah blah blah, yadda, yadda, yadda, this land is your land,
this land is my land…
w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipant——————————————-
alyoshamucciI don’t know if everyone’s used to these yet, but if not, I’ll say up front that I am always more positive than the initial reports. Of course this means when I say something negative it’s pretty well deserved. lol
This game was not as bad for me as it was for others, and I think it’s likely a necessary step in our evolution this season. A couple things worried me, and those got me focused on some draft necessities. So all in all, not a loss without gain.
Note: I know that we came in expecting to trounce them, but this is the NFL. Also? I had no idea they were going to unleash Matt Jones this early in the season. Flip and I had him rated higher than the late 3rd where he got drafted because of his combination of size, power, and movement skills. If the Redskins start riding him when he’s hot, they could easily take that division.
Also note: I didn’t record this one, so this is one take, mostly on my phone. Not much O line stuff as a result.
The Good (there was no great this week)
1) I really liked Ogletree this game. I’ve been waiting for a game to see his maturity … this was it. Fought through blocks, shot gaps, and didn’t miss tackles.
2) Joyner … pretty much same as above. Lightning fast to the spot where he needs to be.
3) Chris Long was noticeably at full strength.
4) Just keeping track, Donald at 2.5 now.
5) TJ’s play early in the game, he missiled in and submarined the pulling OG. That was impressive.
6) Tavon is playing fast.
7) Our young O line had some issues in the run game, to put it mildly, but their pass pro was decent.
8) Bennie Cunningham is really a gift in the screen and check down game because when he turns upfield he’s bringing 220 pounds of fury with him. A check down at 4 yards on a 3rd and 8 may get us a first down half the time to him (or more).
9) Special teams coverage (specifically thinking of Mo) was on the spot.
10) Low penalties. I liked that.
11) The TD play. Quick change deep shot. The throw was in the right spot, with enough air. Foles stood as calm as a Hindu cow while the pocket was nipping at his backside. Great pocket creation by Hav and GRob. …
The Bad
12) __________ (fill in one of 6 names) CATCH THE FLIPPIN BALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Good lord I haven’t seen this many drops in years, wow. You don’t catch the ball you don’t get first downs, without first downs no TOP, without TOP your defense gets worn down. 4 drives, 14 plays to start the game?
13) Greg Williams you have to adjust faster. Now I didn’t watch in slo mo … and I’m NOT an offensive line coach … but it’s not the first time I’ve seen a team use a DT’s speed against him. By halfway through the second drive the plays started to seem tailored to sending Donald upfield away from where the play was going. There is no way he “just misses” 8 times in a row unless that’s what they are going for. GW has to regroup and get that fixed. This is why we seemed to have more success against the run with Westbrooks/Fairley in. I know we’re an “attack” defense … but we have to attack “what they are doing” rather than just the backfield. We figured it out by the second half it seemed, so that’s good if other teams try to do it to us, but then they had another strategy that we couldn’t beat. Maybe we were tired, or they were just firing on all cylinders … but their last drive was a statement. I was almost happy for them, lol.
14) Nick. Dude, the accuracy. I know it’s your first game outside this year, and maybe it was windy. But the short passes need to be ON the receiver and the intermediate ones need to give the receiver a shot. The drops were not alllll on the receivers.
15) Tre wasn’t fully ready (not injury wise, just focus and game speed), and Bennie should have been the primary back.
16) Janoris got caught biting. It happens but he’s gotta have situational awareness that guys are gonna do that to him a couple times a game.
17) Mcleod TERRIBLE angles on a couple plays.
18) JL, you’re first of all part to blame for the lack of recognition as to what was going on with Donald … and second you did not do a very good job mixing up the angles on the defensive front. They were firing off and finding us every time.
19) Refs, that’s PI in the end zone on Garcon. Janoris knew that was coming, was already planting to drive on it when Garcon’s arm fully extended. That shouldn’t even be a tough call. That’s text book Offensive PI.
20) What’s the deal with the clock management at the end of the first half?
Questions …
21) Did Quinn tweak his groin?
22) Grob had a better game didn’t he (not good, just better)?
23) Anyone see anything on the O line specifically that could have been on this list? Because I could’t rewatch it.
24) Is Quick done?
Needs (things that I think got exposed in the loss)
25) #1 WR in the draft.
26) OC.
27) Athletic FS.
So, collegiate addendum.
First, if you didn’t watch the Ole Miss-Bama game, sorry. It was brutal and violent and awesome. I’m eyeing WRs, DEs, and OCs mainly. I was curious about Laquan Treadwell coming back form that injury, but he looks special. There are some freaks at the WR position, and we love those guys. We needed a #1 this last game. Cook drops too many passes for it to be him.
I have about 8 WRs that are freaks with first round possible talent (non-freaks not on the list).
Laquan Treadwell
Michael Thomas
Bug Howard
Tyler Boyd (not our style likely, we like them big)
Duke Williams
Mike Williams
Dacory Robinson
Ricky Seals-JonesThere are more of course ..
The DEs this year are big, and I like that.
I am scoping safeties for Mcleod’s spot. Kearse on Clemson is my frontrunner … long and rangy and fast all in one. Mathews on Auburn is a Juco transfer so I need more tape on him. Tony Conner on Ole Miss is the best, but he may be a box-only.
Have not seen the OCs yet for the most part. Boehm on Mizzou and Mathews on A and M are my favorites coming in, Voltz on Wisconsin too. I think Boehm is our style personally.
wvParticipantChris Long tweet:
[twitter.com]
I know everyone here is down but I’m not going to forget the fact that we beat Seattle just a week ago. It’s a long season.
Looking forward to a hard fought game next Sunday.
wvParticipantBenjamin Hochman
“We saw some things on film that we could take advantage of — we knew if we stop the run, it would be tough,” the nose tackle told me Sunday, after he and the D-line devoured the Rams, winning 24-10. “… We know what type of team they think they are; they’re going to come in, be physical, be frontrunners, and it’s a famous quote: ‘Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.’ That’s the attitude we took. …
“Coach (Jay) Gruden got up in front of the team Wednesday and showed St. Louis tape, showed how physical they are, showing how they beat Seattle and laid it on our guys last year, running reverses when they’re up 21 points. So we took it personal
…The Rams were so deflated, the league might have to call Ted Wells to investigate.
But I’ve got to bring up at least one wacky stat, per Bill Barnwell of Grantland.com. ;In 2014, the final 10 teams that played Seattle in the regular season and had a game the following week, lost the following week. They call it the “Seattle Hangover”: A team becomes so battered by the bruising boom of Seattle’s legion, that the next week they’re not recovered. The Rams had it last season — remember the loss at Kansas City? — and supposedly they had it again Sunday.
========================
Interesting.
Disappointing.
Bring on the Steelers.
I feel like i wanna see
about Four games before
i start trying to answer
any of the big questions.
Thats just me, though.w
v
wvParticipantFisher seems a bit disgusted. Duh.
w
v
wvParticipantthank you. stay healthy, foles! we need you. the rams need you.
gurley. hope to see you next week! if not, get healthy soon. can’t wait for your nfl career to start! hopefully, it goes better than steven’s rams career went! haha!
I’ll be surprised if Gurley plays before the Arizona game.
w
vSeptember 20, 2015 at 7:10 pm in reply to: Rams not a road team yet? (official Wash game response thread) #30962
wvParticipanti think it’s a fair question.
personally. i think they do. i don’t think you play the seahawks and niners as tough as they have the past several years without having heart.
maturity? intelligence? they may lack those qualities…
sob…
Well, most of us are/were expecting a Ten win team. Not an elite team, not
a championship team. A Ten win team this year. The Oline being
too young and inconsistent to expect an elite team.So, can they still be a ten win type team?
I think so. I say that because i think most of us thought they’d get
better as the year went along. One would think the young OLine
would get better and Gurley and Quick should help. One would think.We’ll see.
Big game next week, obviously.
I personally, did not think Foles was “inaccurate” last week.
I dont think thats the word i would use. That pass to Stedman
was like Warner-to-Proehl. It was dead perfect in the clutch.w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
wv.
September 20, 2015 at 6:52 pm in reply to: Rams not a road team yet? (official Wash game response thread) #30956
wvParticipantIs it fair to ask the question:
Do the St Louis Rams have heart ?Is that a fair question?
I know it will be asked.
w
v
wvParticipantWell, it sucks to lose to Washington, it really does,
but one win and one loss at this early stage is
not the end of the season, right?Big home game coming up.
1 and 2 or 2 and 1 —
we shall see.Maybe Fisher will kick them
in the ass this week.w
vSeptember 20, 2015 at 5:29 pm in reply to: Rams not a road team yet? (official Wash game response thread) #30948
wvParticipant—————————————
Laram
Sure the players didn’t show up but the gameplan of the Redskins was superb.The Rams got out coached on both sides of the ball.
The three tight end sets and playcalling on offense kept the Rams defense off balance.
On defense they forced Foles to beat them through the pass, then pressured him.
Total dominance all the way around.
…you give up over 180yds rushing and 85% comp % to Kirk Cousins, NOBODY played well on defense!!
=========================================September 20, 2015 at 5:22 pm in reply to: Rams not a road team yet? (official Wash game response thread) #30944
wvParticipantI missed the game. Sigh. Disappointing loss for sure.
I read the gamebook. No INTs for Foles. No Ram fumbles.
If you had told me the Rams would win the turnover battle
(+1) and still lose, I’d have been skeptical.So, what happened? Looks like the Rams offense
was abysmal in the first half, and in the 4th quarter.w
v
wvParticipantOkay, enough already.
This is weird.
It’s like…the national media are all just taking it for granted that the Rams are good. How did this happen all of a sudden?
Back in ’99, they had to go through various stages to arrive at Acceptance that the Rams were good: denial, they’re lucky, they haven’t played anybody, running up the score against bad teams, whatever.
This is just weird. A lot of the heads picked the Rams to beat Seattle, and now they’re #9 in USA Today, and all these guys are giving the Rams the WA game, like they are taking it for granted, “Yeah, the Rams are a good, solid football team.” They aren’t even being called “up-and-coming” or anything. You would think the Rams were in the playoffs the last couple of years.
————————
Well, I think we all know,
none of this zany-hoopla means anything,
until, RFL is on board.w
v
wvParticipantWell, Fisher doesn’t wanna irk the officials by slamming them,
so he was diplomatic, but that was NOT a hard or confusing call to make.
It was pretty simple, really. It was a valid fair catch and the
Seahawks slammed into him. What’s so complicated about that?w
v
wvParticipantAs we get closer to game time my optimism wanes.
It’s not based on logic or anything tangible. Purely emotional.
I think it comes from seeing this scenario play out many times before.
Rams coming off a big win – should be able to handle an inferior opponent…
————————
Most of those other games in the last two years
were Ram teams using a no.2 or no.3 QB,
and without the experience and talent they have this year.If the OLine just plays “ok” this should be a win.
But then, you know all that.
w
v -
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

