Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipantThe Rams have more talent on each unit,
as far as I can tell.It is a road-game and all, but the Rams finally
have a no.1 veteran QB. So that mitigates
the road-effect somewhat.Only the Rams can beat the Rams,
in this game.Lets hope they want it, real bad.
Rams 31
Washington 10w
v
wvParticipantWhat!
No “Human Centipede?”
This is an outrage.
I must say that the Sight and Sound list wasn’t that impressive for me. Yeah–a few: Godfather flicks, Apocalypse Now, etc. But really? “Mulholland Drive?” I don’t even think Lynch knew what he wanted that film to be. Nonsensical garbage that only the finest critics at blowing smoke up each others ass can appreciate.
Anyway–someday I will post my filmlist and everyone on the internet will nod thoughtfully and say, “You know–he’s right.”
===============
Is Plan 9 from Outer Space,
on your greatest-movies list?
http://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/25-movies-so-bad-theyre-unmissable/w
v

wvParticipantHe’s also healthy. For TA to be effective, his legs need to be fresh. A twinge in the ankles or knees slows him down some, and then he’s got no advantage since he’s so small and can’t break tackles.
To me, the difference in this game was he saw the field a little better, but also that move he put on Sherman to get open. If Foles can catch up with TA’s speed, maybe we get a few more home run balls to him this year.
I have not seen Sherman beaten that badly before. Not that
i watch him all that much, but I aint seen that before.
Looked like he had sherman by three yards at one point.Tavon’s been open deep before and the QB has missed him
or missed seeing him. You add those chances to the TD’s
that have been called back, and he’s had some big plays.My thing with Tavon is drops and fumbles. Themz is big.
Can he improve on that.w
v
wvParticipantIt does not start at 3:00
It starts at 4:25.
If YOU choose to spend 1 minute and 25 seconds,
listening to that radio-celebrity-guy that’s fine.
But I lost a minute and 25 seconds of my life
that I cannot now get back.CoselL says Laurinaitis is an above-average NFL linebacker.
Said Brockers was “sensational” and Greg Robinson is “a concern”
and not playing up to his talent-level.Said Foles is not as good a “thrower” as Bradford,
but “its hard to know what Bradford is because he hasnt played very much.”
Says Bradford has more “talent.”Radio guy said Rams WR’s really liked Foles but Cosell said in Philly “it
was the opposite”(Reall/? I dont remember reading that anywhere)
w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantThanks Ag.
Rams Oline “was up and down” but “wasn’t overpowered”
“Foles is an odd player. There are times he stands and delivers under duress and you think, Wow thats pretty good, but then theres other times when…(i couldnt quite hear what cossell said next. I ‘think’ he said ” he takes sacks and breaks down….” ?
w
v
wvParticipantzn, feel free to move these into the other Washington thread if u want.
wvParticipantWhere is Greg Cossell?
I want me some Cossell.
w
v
wvParticipant“...Having just played the toughest cover-three based defense in the NFL and won, the Rams will expect to have similar results against Washington. Washington’s scheme is far more basic at this stage than Seattle’s, meaning St. Louis should be able to use all of its cover-three beaters without being surprised by a different type of coverage. It will be key for the Redskins to generate more of a pass rush than they did against the Dolphins if they are to prevent the Rams from picking up big chunks of yards….”
———————–Yeah, thats gonna be the story every game, really. Can teams
“generate a pass rush” against the Ram OLine.“Anytime you have the front four they have, the pass rusher they have, the front seven does give you a lot of freedom to do some things that are unique,” Cousins said. “When you feel like you can get home with certain players, it gives you some flexibility. I think that their talent combined with their philosophy is a combination that can wreak a lot of havoc, and they’ve shown that the last few seasons with their personnel.”
I wonder what are the things GW can do that are ‘unique’ ?
w
v
wvParticipanthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/football-insider/wp/2015/09/17/previewing-the-rams-offense-against-the-redskins-defense-cover-three-beaters/
“…The Redskins’ Week 2 opponent, the St. Louis Rams, faced a Seahawks defense in Week 1 that is also built on the cover-three scheme. The Rams found success using one of the same concepts we just saw from Miami….” see link for pass-play breakdown vs Seahawks.Washington Post articles:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/The R-Word issue:
What prompted an Indian rodeo to renounce the Redskins name and reject Dan Snyder’s money
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/what-prompted-an-indian-rodeo-to-renounce-the-redskins-name-and-reject-dan-snyders-money/2015/09/17/08e4398c-51a1-11e5-933e-7d06c647a395_story.html
wvParticipantPersonally, I dont like waiting until one full game has passsed
to rank teams.I think teams should be ranked after the first quarter
of the first game. And then I’d like to see a new
media-ranking after each quarter.w
v
wvParticipantJust a note on Russell Wilsons “1-0” tweet that the Rams
used as “motivation”. Apparently, Wilson says that every year, etc:w
v
wvParticipanthttp://www.seattletimes.com/sports/seahawks/one-on-one-columnists-larry-stone-and-matt-calkins-discuss-seahawks-loss-kam-chancellors-ongoing-holdout/
“seattle got outplayed wire to wire”w
vSeptember 16, 2015 at 9:47 pm in reply to: Tweets 9/16 …. injuries & recoveries (Johnson back?) #30700
wvParticipantI am quite heartened that Sims is out for only a few weeks. I thought that was the end of his season.
Yeah Sims is one of those good role players that you need
to win a Ring. Maybe, kinda like an Ernie Conwell. Ya know.
He can make some big plays, with all the attention Quinn
and Donald get.w
vAt last…the Rams have a lot of those kind of guys again.
Jeeze. It was just 5 years ago a guy like Sims was the best player in his unit. Now we have those kind of guys in depth positions. Conwell, Robinson, Holcombe, those kind of guys who were just suddenly there making a big play.
Yup. I’m still waiting for this team to come into clear focus.
Maybe It’ll be a bit like the GSOT. I dont mean it’ll be as good,
but the GSOT made a LOT of mistakes in the Martz years, but they were often
good enough to overcome the lack of fundamentals. Maybe Fisher’s team
will make a lot of mistakes but that ferocious front seven may
overcome it, anyway.I dunno what was going on with Seattle’s defense, but there were
numerous times Ram receivers seemed wide open. Did it seem that way to you?w
v
wvParticipantThis will sound weird, but A.Donald reminds me of Ali
sometimes. The power/speed combination. And the way
he sometimes just makes opposing players look like Chuck Wepner.He Floats like a butterfly and stings like a bee.
w
vSeptember 16, 2015 at 7:34 pm in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30690
wvParticipantjust want to add one thing. to kind of temper the excitement around foles. he got lucky. the terms we use. the intangibles. the improvisation. being a gamer. it could have easily gone the other way. the pass to tavon was woefully underthrown and should have been a td. the pass to cook in the first half was a terrible throw and should easily have been a touchdown. instead it was just a first down. that jump shot to cunningham everyone raves about. easily could have been a disaster. those things aren’t always going to go well. i don’t think foles is that good. i’m still of the belief that he ultimately needs a strong running game to mask his shortcomings. mostly his lack of arm strength.
but most importantly, that touchdown to kendricks was also woefully underthrown. if bailey doesn’t trip over his own feet. he easily breaks up that pass. and we might be looking at a rams’ loss.
just wanted to add that to here. although i do think he played well. don’t get me wrong. it’s good to know he can make plays when the rams need it. and that’ll come in handy. but ultimately i think the rams need the running game fast or defenses will start making foles pay.
Well, I dunno. I think he was also “unlucky” at times. I mean
how many games is he gonna get blind-sided, stripped and give up a TD ?Let us hope it is not a regular occurrence.
As a gazillion posters have noted this year — if he’s significantly better than Austin and Clemmens, the offense should win a few more games. And so far he looks significantly better than a second string QB. If anything, he looks like a guy that just might scare teams in the fourth quarter in close games.
w
vSeptember 16, 2015 at 7:27 pm in reply to: Tweets 9/16 …. injuries & recoveries (Johnson back?) #30687
wvParticipantI am quite heartened that Sims is out for only a few weeks. I thought that was the end of his season.
Yeah Sims is one of those good role players that you need
to win a Ring. Maybe, kinda like an Ernie Conwell. Ya know.
He can make some big plays, with all the attention Quinn
and Donald get.w
vSeptember 16, 2015 at 9:01 am in reply to: Thomas: Rams won almost in spite of themselves against Seattle #30631
wvParticipantI’d cut Peade now. Seriously. Just cut him. Please. Just do it.
Just watching him on KO returns is painful. Not sure I’ve seen him cross the 15 yard line very often. Rams O would gain 5 yards per KO if he simply took a knee…
Oh, I’d feel relieved if he always took a knee in the endzone.
I mean, the odds are lower that he’d fumble it, then.If yer gonna be a fumbler you better be Eric Dickerson.
Or at the very least Az Hakim. Pead is more of a Cleveland Gary.w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipant“Some people can’t figure out what I’m doing,” he had said in June. “It’s not a walk-hop, it’s not a trot. It’s running, or as close as I can get to running, and it’s harder than doing it on two legs. It makes me mad when people call this a walk. If I was walking, it wouldn’t be anything.”
He would run two miles, take a brief water break at the van that his best friend, Doug Alward, drove beside him, run another two miles, and then take another break. Terry continued this routine until he covered 14 to 16 miles, usually finishing his morning stint by 8. He would rest for three hours, then run another 10 to 12 miles, regardless of heat, cold, crowds, or headwinds.
In the afternoons and evenings, he gave interviews and addressed audiences in community halls and school gyms. As he spoke, a representative of the Canadian Cancer Society would move among the crowd, collecting bills and change in plastic trash bags and wrinkled grocery sacks. Every cent went directly to fighting cancer; all expenses for the Marathon of Hope were separately donated. He declined all sponsorship offers and displayed no advertising logos, not even a T-shirt with the name of a college or hockey team. The only hint of a corporation’s presence were the three parallel stripes on Terry’s dark-blue Adidas Orions….see link
http://www.runnersworld.com/runners-stories/terry-foxs-marathon-of-hope
wvParticipantYeah, I remember that guy.
http://www.runnersworld.com/runners-stories/terry-foxs-marathon-of-hope
“…Terry Fox; in a 2004 poll among Canadians, he was voted the second greatest Canadian of all time in any field….”w
v
wvParticipantInter estingly, on that Sight and Sound top50 list, only
two films made the list from 2000 or later:In The Mood For Love
andMulholland Drive
w
v
wvParticipantDonald isn’t far off from establishing himself as the best player from a 2014 draft class that also features Raiders OLB Khalil Mack and Giants WR Odell Beckham Jr.
before last year’s draft i had expressed the hope that the rams could at some point pick the flat out best player in one of these drafts. didn’t matter who it was. but you just look back on that draft and think to yourself that team just nailed that pick.
i think the rams nailed that pick.
Would u rather have Donald or O’Dell Beckham?
w
v
wvParticipantBrock Huard’s Chalk Talk: Why Seahawks failed on fourth-and-1 against Rams
That was fun. I wish the St.Louis media had a smart X’s and O’s guy
that could do that every week.w
v
wvParticipant
wvParticipantSeptember 15, 2015 at 8:08 am in reply to: What does yesterday's victory mean (re: the big picture)? #30550
wvParticipantTavon did look more confident, but success will do that 🙂
You know what i liked best about his game — the short pass he caught
to keep a critical drive going. It wasnt anything spectacular — just a short
route that he’s run a million times under Brian Shot. — but this time he caught it, secured it and got the first down. There were a lot of clutch catches in this game
but that was one of them. It was a ‘routine’ looking clutch play.Tavon HAS to hold on to the passes. So far so good.
You get the sense that Foles trusts ALL of his receivers.
w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
wv.
September 14, 2015 at 5:35 pm in reply to: What does yesterday's victory mean (re: the big picture)? #30488
wvParticipantI watched the Replay, and the thing that stood out to me
was simply this — the Rams have as much or more talent than the Seahawks.I mean, if you look at each unit on defense, offense, special teams, secondary —
the Rams were not outmanned. Not anymore.So, from here on in, its all about execution, motivation, poise, coaching.
I’ll also echo what posters all over the net are saying — it makes
a big difference when you are starting an actual, No.1 QB.
Foles made some elite throws out there. And he improvised.
And he ran. And he was clutch. And he was tough. What a difference.Think about the difference a tough, clutch, starting QB makes
in ROAD games. Think about it.Pead is a liability, imho. I’d cut him. He’s always been a fumbler
and he still is. I’d replace him with a non-fumbler. This team
will win a lot of games if they dont lose the turnover battle.Picture this down the road — Gurley and Tre added to the mix.
Brian Quick added to the mix. The OLine getting more and more experience.I liked the way Cignetti/Foles attacked the middle of the field
with Medium passes. If i remember right, all three of those 80 yard
drives had a zinger up the middle. Man, i loved that.I cant recall any dropped passes by a TE or WR — were there any
drops other than B.Cunningham’s one dropped pass?
The receivers all played well, i thought and looked well-coached.Its awfully tough to overcome a strip-sack-score in the 4th quarter.
This is not the same ole sorry ass Rams. Too much talent now, for that.
So, again, to me, what stood out most was just the sheer amount of raw talent
i saw on this Team. The execution still leaves a lot to be desired.w
vSeptember 14, 2015 at 10:32 am in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30471
wvParticipantJamesJM
On Foles, what I see are the ‘intangibles’. That’s hard to put into words, much less quantify. I got that vibe from him… that of a player who ain’t perhaps pretty, or a stat making machine (although today he had very good stats), but perhaps ‘more’ importantly a guy who can find a way to win and inspires others to do the same. There was a different ‘feel’ to this game, for me.
Now don’t get me wrong… when the Hawks took the lead late in the 4th I fell back into my chair with a degree of grim resignation just like most… BUT….when they got the ball again it was different for me, than the last two years anyway, perhaps longer. I didn’t give up…. but more than that…. I really thought they had a shot to pull out the miracle come from behind.
There was determination on that Ram’s team today that was palpable. I don’t put that all in Foles performance, but I certainly think he led the way. – JamesJM
Yeah, Foles definitely aint pretty. He aint Bert Jones,
but he ‘is’ kinda ‘old-school’ in a way.
He’s tenacious and a gamer. He’s Roman Gabriel-ish.He’s also a leader. The man is a leader.
And he knows “people” — its very obvious
in his statements that he understands
human-psychology, fan-psychology, player-psychology.w
v
wvParticipantthat foles to bailey pass in ot i think. beautiful. that safety just happened to be earl thomas. albeit an injured earl thomas.
Yes. That was Earl Thomas. And Richard Sherman. And they were both “right there”.
Great great pass. Clutch, tough catch.It bodes well for the future.
Really does.w
vSeptember 13, 2015 at 7:46 pm in reply to: this is great…podcast of Savard & Farr calling the end of the game #30412
wvParticipantThis has to be one of the ALLTIME best Ram openers.
Maybe THE best.
Can anyone think of a better, more significant,
more exciting Opening win that this?I cant.
w
vSeptember 13, 2015 at 7:44 pm in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30409
wvParticipantAs I said in the prediction thread, the Rams would win this one in overtime 34-31. Sure, you all laughed then–thought it was a big joke. But I just knew it–something in my gut.
In any case—-I haven’t been this happy about a football victory in years.
Foles: Love him.
Cignetti: Love him.
Donald: I want to have his baby.
Tavon: Love him too.
What a great football Sunday. I have all week to enjoy it.
Its true. You called it.
And i breathlessly await your
prediction on the Washington game,
which I believe you have promised
to reveal next Sunday about 7:30 pm.w
v -
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

