Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 6,121 through 6,150 (of 7,334 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams News Recap: Oct. 23 #32830
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    tre mason missing too.

    but joe haden is out for the browns. i’d try to catch them sleeping and pass the ball some. play action.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    they shoulda picked alshon not quick.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i really do think they’re better off finding out what they have in bailey and quick.

    they are what they are. cook and britt.

    in reply to: Matchup of Elites with Quinn, Thomas #32805
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    should be a good challenge for this dline.

    in reply to: Watts up from PS for Mason, Bryant cut #32797
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yikes. i hope someone is watching gurley’s touches.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Looking just at drops now (not catch percentage)…Kendricks, Britt, and Cook all fell off from where they even were last year.

    i can forgive kendricks. playing with a bad thumb has got to be hard.

    cook and britt are dead to me.

    gotta start giving bailey and quick more playing time.

    in reply to: Tweets 10/22 – and Injury News #32787
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    For Cleveland, CB Joe Haden and TE Housler ruled out.

    joe haden out? that’s huge. wonder if the rams try to pass it more.

    in reply to: Teams not throwing Jenkins' way #32785
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    this team is able to draft and develop defensive backs with success. i would lean toward letting him walk. save the big bucks for an aaron donald. i don’t know that i’d put jenkins at that level.

    in reply to: Teams not throwing Jenkins' way #32751
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    not so sure about gaines. i think he might be fragile. what does the draft look like for corners? if they sign him, it’ll have to be at the expense of another player.

    my only question with him is what happens when he gets that huge pay day? right or not i question his motivation.

    in reply to: Would you kill 6.5 Billion people ? #32707
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i would not. but. if i would, i would not discriminate.

    i would divide into as many different demographic categories as possible. or as many as i could think of. by age, ethnicity, geographical location, occupation, wealth, gender, sexual orientation, religion… i don’t know if i’m missing anything. and then i’d just randomly remove a percentage within each category.

    not that i’ve ever thought about this.

    the only other solution i can think of is getting off this planet.

    but then you’d just have more humans.

    in reply to: Foles picks up the pieces after career-worst game #32624
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    the one question i gotta ask myself. can he be as good as eli manning?

    i’d say he definitely could be as good as eli manning. and i’d also say that gurley would rival any running back the giants had.

    and that dline could be as good as that giants dline.

    that’s what i think of when i see these rams play.

    in reply to: Rams defense against the pass #32623
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    for what it’s worth. the rams have held wilson, roethlisberger, palmer, and rodgers to their season low qb ratings so far. the only exception is cousins who had his season high qb rating.

    in reply to: Drops #32618
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t know. bailey hasn’t dropped the ball much from what i can remember. austin has looked fine. kendricks. i attribute that to the bad thumb which required surgery.

    the main culprits for me have been cook and britt. and quite frankly. i’d be glad if neither of them were on this team next year.

    we’ll see about quick.

    in reply to: Cook on the trading block? update: no? #32607
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    even if they can’t get rid of him, he should not see the field anymore. don’t need quitters on this team.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Garrett Reynolds has much to gain as a starter #32606
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think we’ll end up being happy with this guy.

    he gave up a cheap sack letting matthews through untouched. but hopefully the line as a whole tighten things up.

    i think pro football focus gave him a positive run blocking grade which is more than i can say for saffold.

    in reply to: going to watch a game or games Sunday? which? #32605
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I dont even wanna think about the state of the message-boards,
    if the Rams/Fisher lose at home,
    after a bye, to the Browns.

    w
    v

    I think there’s a good chance they will do just that.

    If they do, I think a reasonable response would simply be to say, “Yeah. Saw that one coming.”

    It’s a very simple situation. If the Rams are serious about being competitive, they’ll make a statement in this game. They have the talent for that.

    If they don’t … we’ll know that the Fisher Pattern is still in effect. Fail. Tease. Fail. Repeat.

    i agree. not a must win game. but definitely a statement game. lose and they’ve only shown that they’re the same inconsistent team that has frustrated us in the past.

    in reply to: going to watch a game or games Sunday? which? #32583
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    denver’s offense might be worse than the rams.

    Johnny Football is drinking again,
    Cleveland loses a gut-wrencher in OT

    in Cleveland, and Rams had a Bye and play at home.

    Now dammit, good teams are supposed
    to win games like this.

    Right?

    w
    v

    you would think. the rams should beat the browns.

    in reply to: going to watch a game or games Sunday? which? #32579
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    denver’s offense might be worse than the rams.

    in reply to: Cook on the trading block? update: no? #32578
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    this would be wonderful.

    get some more snaps for harkey.

    and send a message to the team too.

    in reply to: A closer look at what could be next for Rams and Saffold #32506
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah. i almost feel as though they’ll be better off this year with reynolds.

    as for the future hopefully wichmann or the other guy will be ready by then.

    in reply to: Key chapter in the Fisher Era #32504
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    that’s pretty much how i feel. as of now, i’m happy with him as the head coach. and i fully expect this team to finish with a winning record.

    but i might feel differently when the season ends and no progress has been made.

    —————————-

    Sometimes it just depends who’s available. I mean
    if Sid Gillman or Bill Walsh is available,
    I’d probly be in favor of a change, myself.

    My own view of Fisher is on record — I think
    he can definitely build a “winning team” ie.,
    a team that can win a division. I just dont
    know if he can be more than a Shottenheimer-Chuck-Knox
    type. I dunno.

    My biggest concern is with his ideas about Offense.
    I am not sure about his notions in regard to the
    passing-game. I dunno.

    w
    v

    ummm. yeah. i don’t know either. should be an exciting next 11 games.

    in reply to: Key chapter in the Fisher Era #32492
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Overall, I favor Fisher staying. Ask me again at the end of the year. 😉

    that’s pretty much how i feel. as of now, i’m happy with him as the head coach. and i fully expect this team to finish with a winning record.

    but i might feel differently when the season ends and no progress has been made.

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Foles picks up the pieces after career-worst game #32465
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    the passing game with the rbs is another thing cignetti needs to develop too. there’s real potential there.

    in reply to: the film room: gurley and austin #32460
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well i am a fan of kendricks. i don’t think he’ll ever be a superstar, but he can be that hybrid player that fisher loves. do a little bit of everything and add to the deception that gurley and austin provide.

    and this is what i’ve been wanting. other players to play off of that potent gurley austin combo. he doesn’t have to light up the stat sheets. just do enough to keep defenses honest. i hope that this surgery is successful cuz the rams are gonna need him. harkey too.

    the biggest question mark i have is at receiver. can they get bailey more involved. he’s their most sure handed guy. get the play action working, but receivers need to catch the ball. the video seems to imply that’s already started happening, but receivers are dropping catches or foles will make a bad throw.

    it’ll be interesting to see if the offense can continue to progress the next 11 games. if i’m cignetti, i’m concentrating on these three things.

    1. offensive line has to tighten up their pass protection. get guys on the same page.

    2. foles working on the timing with his receivers. his passes are just a little bit off. the potential td throw to kendricks for example was just a little bit behind him. is he just inaccurate or is he just throwing to the wrong spot? i don’t know. but a lot of times those passes are just a half a second behind the receivers. maybe it’s just getting that chemistry down.

    3. find one receiver who can consistently bail the defense out with some first down catches. i think that guy should be bailey. i don’t trust britt. i don’t trust cook. i don’t know about quick. i’m hoping it’s bailey. get him some more snaps.

    in reply to: the film room: gurley and austin #32457
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think what’s interesting is that they mix and match and disguise all the different plays making them look the same right up until the last second.

    i think what cignetti has done is introduced the zone blocking scheme. that’s an element that schotty didn’t incorporate and seems to serve as a nice counter punch to the power schemes they run as well.

    stretch them out wide and the counter them with a gurley power run. or hit them the other way with tavon. so in that sense he has found a different way to use austin. or at least that’s how i understand that. when you get gurley stretching the defense one way and then counter with austin going the other way, the defense is stressed in a way they weren’t before the wide zone offense was installed.

    so cignetti has added a wrinkle that schotty did not have. and it might have actually increased the effectiveness of players including austin. although having gurley there doesn’t hurt.

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: on paper, the Rams match up with Cleveland #32448
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    the defense should have no problems with the browns. i don’t care what the stats say. they’ve competed against some of the best backfields in the nfl and contained them. maybe they haven’t shut them down, but they’ve contained them. they shouldn’t have a problem with cleveland.

    on offense, they should run them ragged. mason should be involved as well. even if they can’t get the passing game going, they should be able to run the ball effectively.

    if they get outplayed, then i will be very disappointed. that would be a huge step back.

    I’ll be disappointed if the Rams don’t win by at least 10 points.

    yes. they should beat them handily.

    i really will be disappointed. i mean barring some catastrophic injury to a key player. there’s no reason the rams shouldn’t beat this team. and not just beat them barely. they’re playing at home. against a journeyman qb and a lousy defense.

    in reply to: on paper, the Rams match up with Cleveland #32445
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    the defense should have no problems with the browns. i don’t care what the stats say. they’ve competed against some of the best backfields in the nfl and contained them. maybe they haven’t shut them down, but they’ve contained them. they shouldn’t have a problem with cleveland.

    on offense, they should run them ragged. mason should be involved as well. even if they can’t get the passing game going, they should be able to run the ball effectively.

    if they get outplayed, then i will be very disappointed. that would be a huge step back.

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: the film room: gurley and austin #32444
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    it’s worth watching. i don’t know if it’s true, but it sounds really good… haha!

    a very nice simplified description of the different components and philosophies that go into their running game and how austin and gurley make it go. bottom line is they are both fantastic athletes and really stress and stretch out the defense. also sounds like they are able to do it in a way that makes it hard for defenses to key in on what they are doing.

    just need to find a way to play off this and get other guys going. but a good foundation is a start.

    in reply to: Saffold decides on shoulder surgery & other tweets #32421
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’m ok with reynolds. saffold wasn’t exactly lighting the world on fire this season anyway.

    and they got some good developmental prospects for next season.

    in reply to: the film room: gurley and austin #32419
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah. makes me excited that this running game could be something special. maybe even a little unpredictable. good description too of how the passing game might play off this gurley austin combo.

Viewing 30 posts - 6,121 through 6,150 (of 7,334 total)