Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 18,211 through 18,240 (of 48,007 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/8 thru 11/11 #124084
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: around the league (week 9) #124083
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: around the league (week 9) #124082
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: press & others (including McV) set up the Seattle game #124081
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124075
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Democratic leaders play a ridiculous blame game with progressives

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/11/08/democratic-leaders-play-ridiculous-blame-game-with-progressives/?fbclid=IwAR0tYqxhRqHV01iXWd3Fk-1tLvSq2eeV-6Y5DdCxPmF1CgVITa6YRwhZJ60

    If a football coach went into a game saying “we’ll rely on passing the ball,” executed that strategy, lost the game, then blamed the loss on running the ball, everyone would laugh at that coach. And yet that’s exactly the approach Democratic moderates are taking after Tuesday’s disappointing House and Senate results: Reject progressives’ suggestions, then blame those suggestions anyway for their failures.

    Remember, from the Democratic primary onward, party leaders warned against running on Medicare-for-all, a Green New Deal and other progressive ideas. That approach, they said, would lead Democrats to lose states such as Florida. (About that…) Instead, Democrats went small, focusing on saving the Affordable Care Act and providing a check on President Trump.

    But after the party lost House seats and failed to retake the Senate, the knives are out for the left anyway. On a House Democrats conference call on Thursday, party leaders and moderates blamed their failures on progressives. Majority Whip James E. Clyburn of South Carolina warned against running on defunding the police or socialized medicine. (Since 2007, Clyburn has collected more than $1.2 million from pharmaceutical PACs, among the most of anyone in Congress.) The attacks were best summed up by Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.): “We need to not ever use the word ‘socialist’ or ‘socialism’ ever again. … We lost good members because of that.”

    Spanberger’s view was echoed by Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) on “Meet the Press”: “I don’t think the American people want to sign up for the Green New Deal. … I don’t think they’re interested in Medicare-for-all or higher taxes that would slow down the economy.” But this diagnosis is at odds with the numbers. A near-majority of voters in swing districts supported the Green New Deal. Fifty-three percent of Americans support Medicare-for-all (and 70 percent support a public option). In exit polls, 57 percent of voters expressed support for Black Lives Matter. In Florida, while moderate Democrats up and down the ticket fell flat, voters passed the $15 minimum wage that the left has been pushing for years. As Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) observed, every swing-district House Democrat who co-sponsored Medicare-for-all kept their seat.

    Yet even if we assume that these polls and results are all misleading, as Ocasio-Cortez pointed out on CNN on Sunday, “not a single member of Congress that I’m aware of campaigned on socialism or defunding the police.” It’s understandable that congressional Democratic leaders want to blame something other than their own candidate recruitment process. But if a candidate didn’t run on defunding the police, yet still couldn’t avoid being tied to “defunding the police,” that’s the candidate’s fault. If a candidate ran on reaching across the aisle, yet got defined as a socialist, that’s the candidate’s fault. And if that candidate couldn’t manage to tie his or her Republican opponent to almost a quarter of a million covid-19 deaths in the United States, a tanked economy or a dozen other policy fiascos, at least one of which was probably directly relevant to the candidate’s district, that’s the candidate’s fault.

    And it’s the fault of a party that is far behind the times when it comes to campaigning online. During the George W. Bush presidency, Democrats dominated the digital space: Forums and blogs (the so-called Net roots) gave the party an edge in both advertising and organizing. But in 2020, sites like Facebook and (especially) YouTube absorb Americans’ attention spans, regardless of affiliation. Yet Democrats are still playing catch-up from 2016 on the former and have barely begun to mobilize on the latter. Progressives such as Ocasio-Cortez have built their brands in this new online space with techniques the whole party could learn from. Yet leadership has all but ignored their successes.

    Offline, things are little better. Black, brown and working-class voters delivered Joe Biden the presidency; the hard work of turning out those voters wasn’t done by the national party this year, but by grass-roots organizers over many years. Stacey Abrams, whose 2018 Georgia gubernatorial campaign cemented the organizational groundwork that turned the state purple this cycle, noted on CNN that “for minority communities, there has to be consistent engagement.” Running away from Black Lives Matter and real health-care reform is the opposite of that approach.

    This is not to say there is a one-size-fits-all approach to contesting 100 Senate seats and 435 House seats. But it is simply false to claim that standing up proudly for policies such as Medicare-for-all and a Green New Deal hasn’t worked, when the truth is it hasn’t been tried. For decades, congressional Democrats have run every cycle with a moderate message engineered by moderate, high-priced consultants. When this plan succeeds, the party establishment trumpets their wisdom. Yet when it more frequently fails, the leadership and moderates blame the progressives they rejected the entire campaign. It’s a “heads we win, tails you lose” approach, and it’s a farce. Until congressional Democrats stop punching left and start fixing their mistakes, more disappointments are sure to follow.

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124074
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    By calling Biden a moderate REPUBLICAN is no different than calling him a communist.

    He’s not a communist. None of his ideas, beliefs, policies, or political programs match anything remotely like communisim.

    His ideas, beliefs, policies and political programs do match those of moderate republicans like the 2 Bush presidents.

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124070
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    But just the fact progressives have to fight another decade to get something the rest of the world has had for ages, says a lot about the Corporotacracy.

    Remember when we were on one of the first incarnations of this board and discussing Obama and Clinton and the dem. primaries? Back then discussing M4A (which wasn’t even called that then) was like having a conversation about Latvian medieval history. Very few people were in on that discussion. A lot of what we discussed was ground-breaking. And now? Biden has to openly declare he’s against it. So it’s on the menu. It may take 10 years but more than 10 years ago, it wasn’t even comprehensible discussion to a lot of people.

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/8 thru 11/11 #124062
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124058
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Before there can be any real progressive movement in this country they have to let the following sink in: Over 40 million people in this country think Biden is either a socialist or a communist.

    There is a real progressive movement in the country. In terms of what voters want, when polled, they identify with progressive positions, too. It is also true that unlike more advanced democracies (in Europe for example), the USA is still dealing with good old-fashioned red scare tactics. But I will say this. People who warn us about that kind of thing actually reinforce those tactics. Sometimes I even think that’s the point.

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124057
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/8 thru 11/11 #124056
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    SeattleRams@seattlerams_nfl
    The Miami Dolphins might be the best team in the NFC West

    J.B. Long@JB_Long
    Rams could not have asked for more from the bye week, with SF, SEA, and ARI all falling.

    Can’t wait to see if they can capitalize in the second half. First place on the line next week at SoFi Stadium.

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    Dolphins are…good? They’re no joke at 5-3, and the Rams’ loss looks less bad now

    Steve Wyche@wyche89
    Dolphins win fourth straight to improve to 5-3 and equal last season’s win total. Tua was excellent and Chan Gailey called an excellent game. They have something real going on in Miami

    Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
    And the AFC East standings look like it’s 1992.

    • Buffalo 7-2
    • Miami 5-3
    • New England 2-5
    • NY Jets 0-8

    ProFootballReference@pfref
    Kyler Murray is the first QB in NFL history to throw 25+ times, have a passer rating of 150+, and lose the game

    in reply to: around the league (week 9) #124050
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    NFL Research@NFLResearch
    Josh Allen is the 1st QB in the Super Bowl era with 400+ pass yds, 3+ pass TD, 0 INT & a 130+ passer rating in multiple games in a season

    Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers & Patrick Mahomes are the only other players with multiple such games in their careers

    NFL Stats@NFL_Stats
    Patrick Mahomes is now the fastest QB in #NFL history to 100 passing TDs (40 games), breaking the previous record held by Dan Marino (44 games)

    in reply to: NFC West (week 9) #124048
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Dan Orlovsky@danorlovsky7
    What was obvious today in the @BuffaloBills & @Seahawks game is how much Daboll and Frazier out-coached Schottenheimer and Norton—an absolute coaching beat down by Buffalo!

    Frank Schwab@YahooSchwab
    The Seahawks defense is a problem. If it doesn’t get better, it’s going to cost them a shot to make a deep playoff run, and it might cost Russell Wilson an MVP too. Though he had his own issues on Sunday.

    in reply to: Ramsless week 9…watching any games? #124041
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jason La Canfora@JasonLaCanfora
    Josh Allen and the Bills off to quite the start. Rare red zone pick from Russ. One way traffic in that game so far

    in reply to: Just a thread for different kindsa interesting things #124039
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124038
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ZN, do you mean someone other than Booker? Apologies in advance if this is something I’ve just missed, but I thought he was firmly entrenched in Jersey politics.

    He meant Charles Booker. Slip of the keyboard.

    Yes thanks for the correction. Though it was more of a braincell slip. I meant Charles Booker.

    in reply to: Ramsless week 9…watching any games? #124031
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I might watch Arizona. If it isn’t the Rams, I am not too interested. Maybe I would like to Dallas get the shit beat out of them?

    Seattle and Buffalo too.

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124030
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    On the other hand.

    (I am being dialectical today.)

    .

    ==

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124028
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    One thing I’ll say: for the last two years, I and progressive candidates have been unseating powerful Dem incumbents supported by DCCC.

    Not *once* has anyone in the party asked me what weaknesses I’ve found in their operation.

    This gets us to a (by now) old theme.

    The mainstream dem party machine courts republicans and absolutely fights against its own progressive wing.

    Tells us everything we need to know about the dem party machine…in case we didn;t know already.

    And of course courting republicans does not work and neither does open warfare against its own progressive wing.

    Example: there’s strong evidence Cory Booker would have beaten McConnell or at least had a much better chance than that bleached dishrag the dem party machine backed (McGrath).

    …

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124026
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    One thing I’ll say: for the last two years, I and progressive candidates have been unseating powerful Dem incumbents supported by DCCC.

    Not *once* has anyone in the party asked me what weaknesses I’ve found in their operation.

    This gets us to a (by now) old theme.

    The mainstream dem party machine courts republicans and absolutely fights against its own progressive wing.

    Tells us everything we need to know about the dem party machine…in case we didn;t know already.

    And of course courting republicans does not work and neither does open warfare against its own progressive wing.

    Example: there’s strong evidence Cory Booker would have beaten McConnell or at least had a much better chance than that bleached dishrag the dem party machine backed (McGrath).

    …

    …

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124016
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I give them not only credit but also courage for their support.

    I don’t see much courage there. Not that it’s the opposite either. Just pragmaticism. That’s not a put down aimed at the progressive dems you list–I have nothing but respect for them. I know many leftists can be very hardcore about how the republicans and democrats are not that different, and frankly, in most cases I agree with that. This election was different though. As a progressive I am pretty clear on Biden’s limitations, and yet, to me Trump was just THAT bad…so no argument from me there.

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #124008
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Anyway, this is the first time Ive actually watched the Corporate-Network-Pundits in many many years. I had forgotten what they are like. It…is…APPALLING how they ALLLLLLLLLLLL sound like David Gergin. He’s the smooth, soothing, civil, moderate-republican from PBS. I mean they ALLLLLLLLLLL push moderate-republican/Dem-Centrist strategies. ALLL of them.

    As you probably know I have not watched any tv news for at least a couple of decades. It’s for the reasons you put so well right there. But then the other night, mon spouse wanted to watch election returns. So the news came on and I tried to sit through it. She ended laughing and turning the tv off because I kept yelling back at the pundits and their pundit platitudes. Mostly for the reasons you describe there. I viscerally could not stand it. I just turned into Monty Python’s annoying peasant from the Holy Grail.

    Arthur: Well I *am* king…
    Man: Oh, king, eh, very nice. And ‘ow’d you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers! By ‘angin’ on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there’s ever going to be any progress,–

    in reply to: what will the Bidenidency look like #124007
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Trump spent years worrying about the stock market only to discover Wall Street doesn’t care if he loses
    Wall Street was fine with a Donald Trump presidency. Turns out it’s good with a Joe Biden presidency, too.

    https://www.vox.com/2020-presidential-election/21552643/stock-market-election-results-reaction

    Joe Biden is president-elect, and Wall Street mostly feels fine about it.

    Investors learned to ignore Donald Trump’s erratic tweets over the last four years and focus on deregulation and tax cuts. And now that his presidency is coming to an end, Wall Street appears to be putting on blinders yet again and brushing off the president’s flailing attempts to cast doubt on the election outcome and stay in power.

    The market was good with Trump entering the White House four years ago. It’s good with him leaving it four years later, too.

    For years, Trump has taken credit for the stock market’s performance — at least when it’s up. In the lead-up to the 2020 election, he consistently claimed that if he were to lose, stocks would plunge. “If I don’t win, you’re going to see a crash like you’ve never seen before,” he told business leaders in February. Vote for him, he said, or 401(k)s were “down the tubes,” would “disintegrate and disappear,” could be kissed goodbye.

    But this week has been a decent one for 401(k)s. Stocks were up Wednesday and Thursday as a Biden victory grew nearer. They dipped slightly Friday, but indexes were mainly flat as investors also digested the October jobs report and the ongoing global pandemic. Wall Street is on track for its best week since April.

    It turns out the market is impossible to predict — even for the president of the United States.

    A view of the exterior of the New York Stock Exchange on November 4. Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images
    By and large, Wall Street’s reaction — or, rather, lack thereof — to the 2020 US election has been pretty positive, with markets nowhere near tanking. President-elect Joe Biden is set to be installed in the White House, an outcome that has been relatively clear since Wednesday morning. Democrats have kept the House of Representatives, but it seems pretty unlikely they’ll take the Senate, unless they win two Georgia runoff races in January.

    Liberal voters seem quite upset Sen. Mitch McConnell is likely to retain power; investors seem to have no such qualms. Sure, they’ll miss out on a big stimulus package or an infrastructure bill a blue wave could have brought with it. But a Joe-Mitch combo also means higher taxes aren’t coming, the trade situation might be easier, and no more wild tweets from the Oval Office.

    “Can you imagine not having to check your tweet file in the morning to see how your stocks are doing?” CNBC’s Jim Cramer said on Squawk on the Street of a potential Biden win on Thursday. “Washington is going to be so boring. The most exciting thing that’ll happen is they’ll finally come up with a name for the Washington [Football] Team. They are going to be so not a part of our existence. It’s joyous.”

    Wall Street was worried about a contested result, but it didn’t turn out to be so bad

    Ahead of the election, Wall Street insiders’ biggest concern wasn’t really a Trump win or a Biden win. They even got excited about a potential blue wave. The real concern was Election-Day chaos and a contested result where there was no clear answer.

    “We’re kind of preparing for Armageddon on November 3,” one senior vice president at a major quant firm, who asked for anonymity in order to speak freely about the matter, told Vox ahead of the election.

    On Thursday, as votes in multiple states continued to be counted and the president baselessly claimed victory and election fraud, I checked in with the same person. Their take now: “I think the general feeling is the uncertainty is annoying, but if the crazy thing was going to happen, it would have happened. So back to business as usual.”

    “INVESTORS WHO WANTED TRUMP TO GO BUT WANTED SOME OF HIS POLICIES TO STAY WILL HAVE THEIR CAKE AND EAT IT, TOO”

    By and large, Trump is just shouting into the void as most voters, the media, lawmakers, and, yes, Wall Street go about their lives.

    “People came in prepared for it to be kind of rough. There hasn’t been any widespread, worrying unrest,” said Dan Egan, managing director of behavioral finance and investment at Betterment. “There’s no catch-fire point or really big thing for anybody to worry about. The slow trickle is good in that it doesn’t allow anybody to get too worried about one specific data point.”

    None of this is to say that things couldn’t change. Trump and the Republican Party have started to file lawsuits in multiple states trying to stop vote-counting, challenge results, or otherwise meddle in the process, though it’s not clear their legal strategy will be particularly successful. The same goes for the president’s Twitter strategy as he continues to tweet away, making false claims about fraud and the election being stolen. Thus far, much of the country just isn’t that unsettled by this, nor are the markets — even though, undoubtedly, the idea of a president who refuses to concede an election is disturbing.

    Joe Biden is not Elizabeth Warren

    “Remember all the talk about a financial transactions tax, an Elizabeth Warren-driven crackdown on private equity, and even the possibility of breaking up the big banks?” wrote Ian Katz, director at Capital Alpha Partners, in a note on Wednesday. “We were very skeptical of any of that happening even if Democrats had won the Senate. Now you can just take it completely off the table.”

    Presidents generally don’t have that big of an impact on markets in the first place — plenty of things move certain instruments, sectors, and stocks all the time. Sometimes there’s no clear explanation for what’s going on at all. Generally, Trump has been pretty favorable to markets because of tax cuts and a deregulatory bent. A Biden presidency will certainly be different from Trump, but it doesn’t at all spell doom for Wall Street.

    Josh Barro, a business columnist at New York magazine, offered up a pretty compelling explanation of the market’s reaction to the election in anticipation of Biden in the White House with McConnell still in control of the Senate. The scenario is basically a steadier one: eased trade tensions with China, the tax landscape without significant change, and a guy in the Oval Office who isn’t so trigger happy on social media. Senate Republicans are also probably going to be pretty choosy about who they confirm as Biden’s Cabinet nominees, meaning no Warren for Treasury or Katie Porter for head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or Bernie Sanders for Labor.

    “Investors who wanted Trump to go but wanted some of his policies to stay will have their cake and eat it, too,” Barro wrote.

    Despite his working-class roots, Biden was Wall Street’s preferred candidate in the 2020 primary, especially compared to Warren or Sanders. And the investor class wasn’t exactly Biden-averse in the general election — there were plenty of Wall Street names on the list of fundraisers his campaign released days before the election.

    Leon Cooperman, a billionaire hedge funder who issued dire warnings about a potential Warren presidency during the 2020 primary and at one point was brought to tears on television about the thought of her in the White House, wound up voting for Biden. “I voted my values and not my pocketbook,” he told CNBC on Wednesday. He said he believes Trump is an “interventionist” and not a capitalist in his attempts to influence the economy — trying to talk the price of oil up and down, leaning on the chairman of the Federal Reserve to make decisions in his favor. “At the end of the day, I made a personal decision that I would rely upon 337 members of Congress and 100 US Senators to decide whether the country will remain capitalistic in its orientation or go socialist,” he said.

    What is fine for Wall Street is not always fine for everyone else

    On Wednesday, the day after the election, shares of Uber and Lyft soared after California voters passed Proposition 22, which exempts companies that rely on gig workers from having to classify them as employees instead of independent contractors. It’s a win for Uber and Lyft and their shareholders — Uber’s CEO has said they’re going to advocate for more things like it. It’s a loss for Uber and Lyft drivers hoping for benefits and protections.

    There are certainly things about the upcoming political landscape that are going to be good for both Wall Street and for ordinary people. A key element of the economy improving is getting the Covid-19 pandemic under control, and there’s little doubt Biden will do more to try to combat the pandemic than Trump will. At the very least, Biden will not actively spread it, and at some point, a vaccine will likely arrive.

    The economy is getting better slowly, but there are still a lot of unknowns. The October jobs report pegged the unemployment rate at 6.9 percent and was generally positive; however, 10 million jobs remain lost from before the pandemic, and the recovery is slowing. It’s also happening unequally: People at the top are doing much better than those at the bottom. The Black unemployment rate is still in double digits.

    In recent months, Wall Street appeared to have been banking on further stimulus from the federal government to follow up the CARES Act, the $2.2 trillion stimulus President Trump signed into law in late March. Election Day came and went without legislation, and it’s not clear if or when a follow-up will come. At the very least, any package is likely to be much smaller than it could have been had there been a Democratic sweep.

    Joe Biden speaking from a podium as Sen. Kamala Harris stands 6 feet away. Drew Angerer/Getty Images
    The markets seem to, at least for now, be okay with the idea of a smaller stimulus. Plus, Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell has taken enormous steps to help support the markets and seems poised to do whatever it takes going forward. For people who lost their jobs or state and local governments facing disastrous budgets or small businesses struggling to stay afloat, further aid is much more vital. A sweeping stimulus package would have made a real difference, and it’s not coming.

    “Without additional relief, we really will see a longer, slower, more painful recovery, and one that will disproportionately inflict deep harm on communities of color,” Angela Hanks, deputy executive director of the progressive group Groundwork Collaborative, recently told Vox.

    The road ahead for the economy — and for the markets — is anything but sure. Covid-19 cases are skyrocketing in the US, and the situation is likely to get worse, not better, before Biden takes office. Trump’s shenanigans to undermine the results of the election could last for months. The economy could backslide. The country could still see election-related unrest. And the markets move for a ton of different reasons day to day and hour to hour.

    Trump has tethered much of his presidency to the stock market, not only in pointing to it as a measure of success but also considering it in his political and policy decisions. His administration reportedly downplayed the pandemic in order to avoid spooking the stock market. He has consistently tried to shape economic and policy choices so as to keep markets riding high.

    As the saying goes, if you need a friend on Wall Street, get a dog. Or at the very least, don’t look to Dow.

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/4 thru 11/7 #124003
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/4 thru 11/7 #124002
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: NFC West (week 9) #124000
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Election Day(s) #123979
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: animal bits #123978
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Two whale-watchers off Avila beach had a terrifying experience when a humpback overturned their kayak and appeared to nearly swallow them. The women surfaced and shortly after, other kayakers and paddleboarders came to help them and check they had not been hurt

    ==

    ==

    Humpback whale almost swallows kayakers near a California beach
    The two managed to escape unscathed, briefly going underwater after capsizing before reemerging
    .

    https://abc7.com/pets-animals/humpback-whale-almost-swallows-kayakers-near-a-ca-beach/7647518/

    AVILA BEACH, Calif. — Two whale watchers had a close encounter while kayaking off the coast of Avila Beach, California, that they will likely never forget.

    Julie McSorley and Liz Cottriel were watching humpback whales on Monday when one decided to get up close and personal. A whale came up underneath them and caused them to capsize.

    “I saw the big pool of fish, the big bait ball come up out of the water,” McSorley told CNN affiliate KMPH. “I saw the whale come up. I thought, ‘Oh, no! It’s too close.'”

    “All of a sudden, I lifted up, and I was in the water.”

    Footage from a witness nearby makes it appear as if the kayakers are being swallowed by the whale, but the two just tipped over.

    “The whale was right here in my face, literally,” Cottriel told KMPH.

    “I’m thinking to myself, ‘I’m gonna push. Like, I’m gonna push a whale out of the way! It was the weirdest thought. I’m thinking, ‘I’m dead. I’m dead.’ I thought it was gonna land on me. Next thing I know, I’m underwater.”

    The two managed to escape unscathed, briefly going underwater after capsizing before reemerging.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/4 thru 11/7 #123974
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/2020/11/07/rams-troy-hill-touchdown-allowed-coverage/

    The Rams have allowed the second-fewest passing yards (1,577) and second-fewest touchdown passes (9) in the NFL, and they lead the league in net yards per pass attempt (5.2). They’ll face their toughest test of the season against the Seahawks in Week 10, with Wilson leading the league in touchdown passes (26) and passer rating (120.8).

Viewing 30 posts - 18,211 through 18,240 (of 48,007 total)