Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 47,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164235
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams agree to terms on trade to acquire Myles Garrett from Browns

    Stu Jackson

    https://www.therams.com/news/rams-agree-to-terms-on-trade-myles-garrett-browns?utm_source=sfmcemail&utm_medium=060126_Myles_Garrett_Trade&utm_campaign=06_01_2026&utm_term=Trades+And+Transactions+-+M+Garrett&utm_id=134849&sfmc_id=00QUW00000S9vHH2AZ&aid=&CFC_RAMS=060126_Myles_Garrett_Trade

    WOODLAND HILLS, Calif. – The Rams have agreed to terms on a trade to acquire All-Pro edge Myles Garrett from the Browns.

    In exchange for the 30-year-old Garrett, Los Angeles sent outside linebacker Jared Verse and a 2027 first-round pick, 2028 second-round pick, and 2029 third-round pick to Cleveland.

    The reigning NFL Defensive Player of the Year, Garrett is coming off a 2025 season in which he set the new NFL single-season sack record with 23. He also won NFL Defensive Player of the Year for the 2023 season.

    A five-time First-Team All-Pro and seven-time Pro Bowl selection, he has amassed 125.5 sacks through his first nine NFL seasons – most among active players. The First-Team All-Pro recognition has come in five of his last six seasons – including the last three consecutively – with six of those seven Pro Bowl nods coming consecutively over the last six years.

    He has also logged double-digit sacks every year since his second season in the league – eight straight years.

    Overall, he has played in 134 games (131 starts) and recorded 412 tackles (293 solo), 149 tackles for loss, 125.5 sacks, 23 forced fumbles, six fumble recoveries, 613 pressures, 372 hurries and one defensive touchdown.

    Garrett originally entered the NFL as the No. 1 overall pick in the 2017 draft by the Browns out of Texas A&M.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 5/26 – 6/1 #164231
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 5/26 – 6/1 #164230
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Nick Wagoner@nwagoner
    The NFC West has been one of the league’s most daunting divisions plenty of times in the past 15 or so years.

    But goodness, that’s one tough neighborhood right now.

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164228
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Sam Monson@SamMonsonNFL
    OK, they can wait a year maybe to re-up Verse, but when they do he’s gonna want 40, 45m a year.

    The Rams have a better player at functionally $33m/y

    Louis Riddick@LRiddickESPN
    #Rams doing it like you should…using every avenue possible to win now while also having an eye towards the future. Well done.

    Steve Wyche@wyche89
    Myles Garrett going to LA gives him the chance to finally experience winning, a consistent culture and a chance at a Super Bowl. Cleveland continues to rebuild. Smart move for all sides

    Howard Balzer@HBalzer721
    Myles Garrett started all 17 games this past season. Garrett played 868 defensive snaps. Garrett has had 8 consecutive double-digit sack seasons.

    Greg Beacham@gregbeacham
    Myles Garrett’s raw numbers are wild. He’s had double-digit sacks in 8 consecutive seasons. All Rams players combined have only had 8 double-digit sack seasons in the past 10 years, and 5 of those were Aaron Donald.

    Doug Farrar@NFL_DougFarrar
    It didn’t matter how great the opposing tackle was — single-teaming Myles Garrett last season was an undisputed invitation to getting your quarterback killed.

    LAFB Network@LAFBNetwork
    The reigning NFL MVP and reigning DPOY are now teammates on the Rams.

    The ONLY other time that happened in NFL history?

    🏆 Steve Young & Deion Sanders on the 49ers.

    Conor Orr@ConorOrr
    Sean McVay getting Myles Garrett was like handing L.A. the password to every opponent’s computer.

    NFL Researcher@NFL_Researcher

    Most sacks in first 10 NFL seasons…

    1. Reggie White – 145.0 (HOF)
    2. Jared Allen – 128.5 (HOF)
    3. DeMarcus Ware – 127.0 (HOF)
    4. Myles Garrett – 125.5
    5. Derrick Thomas – 119.5 (HOF)

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164224
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164223
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 5/26 – 6/1 #164220
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164218
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 5/26 – 6/1 #164217
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164213
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’ve now had about fifteen minutes to think about this. …and I’d like to be the FIRST to begin the board-war-question: So….who’s better, Aaron Donald or Myles Garrett?

    I shall take my leave now.

    w
    v

    Donald’s better because he did it from the inside, which means he faced more blockers.

    But that’s not to say Garrett is just a bag of carrots.

    Garrett is an A+. Donald was an A++.

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164203
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I think this is great. And in fact, relatively a bargain. Is he on the downside? I don’t think so at all. I think he’s in peak form.

    He’ll give them more than Von Miller did in 2021.

    It’s odd to hear some of the criticisms out there (though they’re not common–this is widely considered to be a slam dunk).

    On the one hand, some people say you took Simpson, what about “all in for this year”?

    On the other hand, some people say with Garrett, what about the future?

    I’m with those who say they did both.

    Plus they have Young, Turner, and Nacua coming up as free agents. Odds are they were never going to be in a position to sign Verse. Now they have a player who is consistently better than Verse, and already under contract.

    In terms of “trading away picks,” they did it before—and thrived. They went “all in” throwing picks at Ramsey, Von Miller, and Stafford. Odds are, when the day comes that Garrett is gone, they will do it again.

    I see the Rams as not just leading the pack when it comes to personnel stuff, I see them as lapping the pack.

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164200
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Why the Rams Decided to Swing for the Myles Garrett Blockbuster
    Los Angeles is trying to once again turn the Super Bowl into a home game, while the Browns acquired a great player who fits their timeline.

    Albert Breer

    https://x.com/AlbertBreer/status/2061499767184593097

    Myles Garrett is a Ram.

    Let that sink in.

    In the years since their Super Bowl LVI title, the franchise’s f— them-picks regime has shed icons like Aaron Donald, Cooper Kupp, Jalen Ramsey and Andrew Whitworth. They’ve built through the draft, bringing in young cornerstones such as Kyren Williams, Puka Nacua, Byron Young, Kobie Turner, Braden Fiske and Jared Verse, among others. And now, they’ve ripped the governor off, and punched the gas toward Super Bowl LXI in their home stadium.

    The Rams are trading Verse, a 25-year-old star rusher good enough to draw comparisons to Terrell Suggs, to the Browns, along with a 2027 first-round pick, a 2028 second-round pick and a 2029 third-round pick for Garrett, who has been first-team All-Pro five times and second-team All-Pro twice in his nine-year career.

    In doing so, Los Angeles GM Les Snead and coach Sean McVay are pushing their chips in on a team that went toe-to-toe with the Super Bowl champion Seahawks in the NFC title game last year, has the reigning MVP at quarterback, and pushed the button on another monster trade for a veteran only three months ago with the acquisition of Chiefs All-Pro corner Trent McDuffie.

    And this blockbuster deal goes back almost that far. In March, the Rams went down the road with the Eagles on the idea of a trade for A.J. Brown—one that would be centered on a 2028 first-rounder and contingent on a corresponding deal to send Davante Adams elsewhere. The team couldn’t thread the needle on sequencing a Brown-Adams double, and there were some concerns about Brown’s knee. But the Rams showed then that they had a big swing in them.

    Then, the move to take Ty Simpson with the 13th pick—seen by many as a move that wouldn’t help Matthew Stafford in the here and now—actually was viewed internally as one that gave the Rams the flexibility they needed to help Stafford get another ring in the most profound way possible. With their next quarterback in the fold, the team could afford to be more creative to find a way to add another massive piece because they wouldn’t need to worry about spending a first-rounder in 2027 or 2028 on Stafford’s replacement.

    How the Rams landed on Garrett

    The Rams, remember, had a difference-maker of the highest order on defense for a decade in Donald, and with that added flexibility with their draft picks, their eyes turned to the idea of landing Garrett, who’d put in and rescinded a trade request a year earlier. And they knew, of course, that generating that sort of rare opportunity would force them to do something uncomfortable, and that in this case was trading a young player they badly wanted to keep—the Rams tried, right up until the end, to find a way not to include Verse in the deal.

    As for the Browns, Garrett’s trade request, made during Super Bowl week in February 2025, did force the powers that be to at least ponder the idea of eventually moving him.

    As such, GM Andrew Berry and the Browns had three principles they’d stick to on a deal. First, because Garrett isn’t a normal star, the normal two-first-round-picks framework of a star-centered deal (Khalil Mack, Ramsey, etc.) wasn’t going to work—the deal would have to serve the Browns both short term and long term. Second, along those lines, a young star on a cost-controlled deal at a premium position would have to be included in the deal. And third, having that star in the deal would be on top of getting premium draft capital.

    Getting a two-time Pro Bowler, Verse, who’s only 25, and has two years left on his rookie deal, plus an option for 2028, on top of top-100 picks in the next three drafts, with a first-rounder coming in 11 months, would satisfy all of that.

    Verse also lines up from a timeline standpoint with the Browns’ burgeoning young core. Last year’s trade to Jacksonville of the second pick and the right to draft Travis Hunter was an acknowledgment from Berry & Co. that Cleveland was more than a player away, and the group that made playoff appearances in 2020 and 2022, and won the franchise’s first playoff game since Bill Belichick was its coach, had aged out.

    That doesn’t mean, by the way, that they didn’t think Garrett had a lot left. In fact, the Browns expected Garrett to age like Bruce Smith (who was four times first-team All-Pro and had seven double-digit sack seasons in his 30s, and won DPOY at 33) or Reggie White (who had five double-digit sack seasons in his 30s, and was first-team All-Pro at 34 and 37) did a generation ago. They saw him as that freakish, that driven and different.

    Browns linebacker Jared Verse
    Rams linebacker Jared Verse was traded to the Browns as part of the Myles Garrett deal. | Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

    Why Verse fits with the Browns

    It was just that, at this point, the value started to match up. Verse matches up age-wise with the guys they’ve drafted since the Hunter trade—players such as Carson Schwesinger, Mason Graham, Quinshon Judkins, Harold Fannin Jr., Dylan Sampson, and now Spencer Fano, KC Concepcion and Denzel Boston, who are all in their early 20s. He also plays the same position, again, a premium position, that Garrett does.

    And all of those draft picks should help the Browns’ pursuit of their next quarterback, pending what happens with Deshaun Watson, Shedeur Sanders, Dillon Gabriel and rookie Taylen Green over the course of the next nine months, as they go forward with a young core that’ll be built to grow around whoever that quarterback winds up being.

    But in the end, there’s also an acknowledgment here that, for Cleveland, this is trading a player like Jim Brown or Otto Graham, one whose name will be up in the stadium years from now and whose football career will be honored 45 minutes down the road in Canton.

    Because of all that, the Browns have communicated with Garrett, who needed to waive his no-trade clause for the deal to be completed, on the potential that this could happen, and had Garrett come to Cleveland on Saturday to sit down with the Haslams and Berry.

    There were signs this could happen, of course—pushing back the execution of Garrett’s $29.2 million option bonus to September, and Garrett skipping the start of OTAs (he was actually traveling through much of the spring). But the relationship that comes out of it remains intact, and in a good place, with everyone knowing Garrett will be back someday to be honored for the nine otherworldly seasons he had as a Brown, which includes breaking the NFL’s single-season sack record last year.

    Similarly, the Rams, and McVay in particular, wanted to make sure the player they were so reluctant to give up, Verse, got the news from them first. That happened Monday. And with that, L.A. can move forward with the NFL’s MVP and now perhaps its best player on the roster, with the goal of turning the Super Bowl into a home game, the same way they did the last time when they made a trade of this magnitude.

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164199
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Frank Schwab@YahooSchwab
    31 teams treat draft picks like invaluable assets and if they’re traded it’s like removing an appendage. (yes I’m exaggerating there … but not by much)

    The other team is the runaway Super Bowl favorite with the best roster in the NFL.

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164198
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jay Glazer@JayGlazer
    Rams and Browns started talking about the Myles Garrett trade since draft time. One of the reasons they selected Ty Simpson in first round was because they knew they’d be without AT LEAST next years one. Rams were hoping to make it all draft capital and fought to not include Verse in deal to the end but he was a necessary for the Browns.

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164197
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    The Rams didn’t want to give up Jared Verse, but the Browns refused to trade Myles Garrett unless they got Verse in return.

    That’s how highly viewed Verse is in the Browns’ building.

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164195
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
    There are still more terms to be finalized on this one, I’m told. But Rams and Browns have an agreement for one of the biggest non-QB trades (or any trade) in NFL history.

    Geoff Schwartz@geoffschwartz
    Holy shit man. What a trade for the Rams

    Adam Schefter@AdamSchefter
    The trade of the off-season

    Sam Monson@SamMonsonNFL
    Rams are inheriting Garrett’s contract with low cap hits for 3 years and a functional APY of ~$33m for 3 years – very possibly the last 3 elite years he has left.

    That’s like 8th in EDGE APY, some ~15m/y under market now.

    Contract wise, Garrett is a bargain for the Rams.

    Rams already had the best roster in the NFL and they just upgraded one of their edge rushers to Myles Garrett – the best PLAYER in the NFL.

    Steve Wyche@wyche89
    Rams know how many points they gave up at the tail end of the season, including 69 in two losses to Seattle – games in which they combined for 64 points – and knew the issues to address. Aaaand Myles Garrett, Trent McDuffie, and Jaylon Watson added.

    Vincent Bonsignore@VinnyBonsignore
    One reason the @Rams were ok giving up next year’s No. 1 pick for Myles Garrett?

    By acting proactively to address life after Matthew Stafford by drafting Ty Simpson, it freed up next years first rounder to be used to address other parts of the roster

    With their next QB already in place it allowed them to be aggressive in using future assets to maximize these next two seasons

    Trust me. That’s the thought process and always was

    @Rams HC Sean McVay told me at the owners meetings he needed closers on defense. With Garrett/McDuffie he now has two

    The ⁦@RamsNFL⁩ have been playing three dimensional chess all offseason, and it all played out just as they envisioned. For now and the future.

    Nate Atkins@NateAtkins_
    I think that’s a good return for the Browns, too, if they were ever going to trade the best defensive player in franchise history.

    Jared Verse has a Pro Bowl floor and a top-5 DE ceiling. They can wait on the ascension since they’re a year-plus away, and the draft haul is great.

    Mina Kimes@minakimes
    Myles Garrett rushing next to the Rams DTs (Turner and Fiske were 5th and 14th in pass rush win league-wide amongst DTs) is nasty, nasty stuff.

    Dane Brugler@dpbrugler
    I was skeptical CLE would ever trade MG because the draft compensation would never be enough. However, getting back a player like JV changes the math.

    Still, a no-brainer move for LAR. For CLE, compensation was never going to be enough, but this probably closest they could get.

    Brock Vierra@BrockVierra
    Myles Garrett should be what Charles Haley meant to the Dallas Cowboys. A clear force and finisher that sets the foundation for offensive success.

    Very interested to see how the offense evolves as a result

    Matt Verderame@MattVerderame
    The Rams went to the NFC Championship Game last year and then added Trent McDuffie and Myles Garrett lol

    Ari Meirov@MySportsUpdate
    The scary part of Myles Garrett on the #Rams…

    A lot of Garrett’s production — including his NFL-record 23 sacks last season — came while playing on a team that was frequently trailing.

    The thought of Garrett on a Rams team that should be playing with leads a lot more often is a scary one for the rest of the NFL.

    in reply to: Myles Garrett Traded for Jared Verse ESPN #164191
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well, he’s no Mike Wilcher.

    But he’ll do.

    Added note. Part of the logic of drafting Simpson was that it let the Rams play with the 2027 1st round pick, instead of waiting to use it for a qb. So much for the “but I thought they were going to go all in this year!” complaint.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 5/26 – 6/1 #164183
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: interviews, May to June #164182
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rob is everywhere now.

    in reply to: around the league (May through June) #164180
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Other sports #164179
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams 6th rd pick – CJ Daniels, WR. Miami #164178
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams 6th rd pick – CJ Daniels, WR. Miami #164177
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://www.si.com/nfl/draft/onsi/late-round-expert/2026-nfl-draft-late-round-wide-receivers-set-to-become-shocking-steals

    CJ Daniels, WR, Los Angeles Rams (Round 6, No. 197)

    The Los Angeles Rams entered the draft possibly needing a successor for Davante Adams, who is entering the final year of his contract. Nobody expected them to wait until the sixth round and their second-last selection to pick one. That’ll matter little if CJ Daniels develops into the steal Sean McVay and Les Snead think he’s capable of becoming.

    Daniels has some underrated route-running abilities and he also thrived as a contested-catch winner at both LSU and Miami. The Rams obviously know a little something about late-round receivers after landing Puka Nacua, one of the steals of the decade. Daniels has a favorable outlook in L.A.

    in reply to: interviews, May to June #164176
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #164175
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: the new OL thread (5/6) #164173
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/rams/2026/05/30/rams-kevin-dotson-pff-grade-4th-quarter/90299315007/?taid=6a1ad3cdb77dd20001b7dc75&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter

    According to Pro Football Focus, Kevin Dotson was at his best when the pressure was on. PFF ranked Dotson as one of their 10 highest-graded players in the fourth quarter and overtime from 2025. Dotson graded out at 90.5 in the fourth quarter and overtime, the seventh-highest grade of any player.

    Dotson finished last season as PFF’s third-highest-graded guard overall, driven largely by his dominance late in games. He allowed just two pressures in the fourth quarter and overtime all season, and neither resulted in Matthew Stafford taking a hit.

    He was even more dominant in the run game. Dotson’s PFF run-blocking grade improved from 84.5 through the first three quarters to 90.8 in the fourth quarter and overtime. Only Lions tackle Penei Sewell graded higher as a run blocker in late-game situations.

    Dotson’s ability to move defenders off the ball was a major reason the Rams led the NFL in fourth-quarter rushing yards before contact.

    in reply to: Stafford 2026 … he’s coming back #164172
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    SleeperNFL@SleeperNFL
    The Rams reportedly believe Matthew Stafford’s lack of training camp reps last year was a “critical form of load management,” and plan to manage his reps again this offseason.

    Stafford returned and had “the best season of his life.”

    in reply to: NFL History: Around the League #164166
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Best Rams? Before 2020. Olsen, Jones, Youngblood, Donald, Warner

    And my list suggests the possibility of defying time, and starting a 4/3 DL that consists of all these guys in their prime:

    Jones Donald Olsen Youngblood

    That would be fun to watch

    in reply to: Puka #164165
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    According to Pro Football Focus, the selection of receiver Puka Nacua with the No. 179 pick in 2023 ranked as the fifth-best pick outside of the first round since 2026

    There is a factual/grammar situation going on here that I am not comfortable with.

    Here;s the title of the PFF article that guy is quoting from: Ranking the most valuable non-first-round NFL Draft picks since 2016

    It was obviously a tpyo.

    I mean a tupo.

    Uh…typ9.

    in reply to: Stafford 2026 … he’s coming back #164164
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I like keeping track of comeback wins but the number isn’t necessarily all that indicative. 50 is good for Stafford. The better stat would be percentage of wins in comeback situations, but then that’s a hard stat to determine.

    Did you know that in 2016 the Lions went 9-7, and 8 of those wins were 4th quarter comebacks.

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 47,165 total)