Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 2,641 through 2,670 (of 12,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Ruggs dui-with-death incident #133626
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    … It’s bad enough that we have floods, famines, and diseases without human idiocy added to the mix.

    ———

    Speaking of idiocy, I see Role-Model to millions of cheese-head kids,
    Aaron-Rogers, was relying on a
    vaccination-alternative of some sort.

    And so it goes.

    w
    v

    in reply to: The Ruggs dui-with-death incident #133621
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    There’s a report he was driving 156 miles per hour.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think this was a really bad decision by the Rams.
    And when Kupp breaks down, they will regret it.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Von Miller to the Los Angeles Rams #133586
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Listen to Mark Sanchez talk about Von Miller
    and what he brings to the ‘blueprint’ used against Kyler M.

    ———

    in reply to: Von Miller to the Los Angeles Rams #133576
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I remember getting all excited when I heard Suh was gonna be on the line
    with Donald. That one was disappointing. Never really lived up to
    the expectations.

    I’m excited again.

    Old Ram fans have a thing about DLines,
    I guess.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Eric Dickerson: #133548
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Von Miller to the Los Angeles Rams #133546
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Metrics guy doesnt like the trade. Sez Von aint the same player he wuz.

    in reply to: Von Miller to the Los Angeles Rams #133521
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    whole-lee shit

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Houston game #133515
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ..impressive numbers, but there it just feels like there are loose parts. This team makes too many unforced errors to win it all.

    Of course, there is still plenty of time, but looking at the next 5 games
    … I think we will really see if the Rams are contenders or pretenders now.

    ==========

    Yeah, the second-season starts next week. Its basically playoff-positioning season now. Dallas, Packers, Rams, Bucs, Cards. Probly one or two others.

    I dont see a clear favorite yet. One of those teams is gonna be healthy
    and hot, come playoff time. You can make a case for any of those teams,
    and its ‘very’ close, but as of now, i think the Rams have a tiny edge.

    Because of Stafford. Simple as that.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Houston game #133497
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Terrible call against the Texans on that fourth down play,
    when it was ten to zip.

    Rams probly dont beat the spread
    if thats called correctly.

    Texans are awful. Less said about this game the better.

    Next:
    Titans
    at SF
    at GB
    Jax
    at Ariz

    —–
    w
    v

    in reply to: Just a thread for different kindsa interesting things #133472
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ‘Lurch’ did tons of tv spots that you didnt know about:
    ——–

    in reply to: DeSean Jackson wants to be traded? #133468
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    He’s Kupp insurance.
    And i expect Kupp to break at some point.
    Its a mistake to trade him, imho.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/30 thru 11/3 #133466
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    And the thing is, we know Les Snead is good at his job, and has
    made a lot of solid picks and deals, but….the Tutu thing was BAD.
    Because almost all of us KNEW you just dont make that pick.
    You just dont.

    I will never ever understand that pick.

    Coulda had a solid young OLineman.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Just a thread for different kindsa interesting things #133452
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    My favorite director, on cameras, and politics.
    I set the vid to the 41 minute mark:

    in reply to: Kroenke ..wants to share relocation legal fees ESPN #133448
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The headline still cracks me up.

    ========

    “financial pivot”

    I wonder if, in the history of the US, there’s ever
    been an article about poor people where the headline
    had the term ‘financial pivot’ in it.

    Go rams.
    w
    v

    in reply to: Other Futbol #133429
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I watched some vids. The celebrity-talking-heads have decided
    the cardinals are bums now. Worst team in the NFL. In big trouble.
    Flawed. Losers.

    Glad they are finally seeing clearly.

    w
    v

    in reply to: do the poor Rams stand the remotest chance against Houston? #133407
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Jet game. Thats all I’m sayin.

    w
    v

    in reply to: political tweets #133404
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    In all my decades, I’ve never heard of a Judge ruling that
    neither side can call the dead people ‘victims.’

    I mean, I can understand the defense calling them looters
    etc, if they have some credible evidence of that, etc,
    but to rule that neither side can call them victims
    is….something I’ve never heard of.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Stafford thread (starting 10/21, going into week 7) #133403
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I usually dont watch these little vids on players, but i watched this one today,
    on Stafford, (I’m sure its posted somewhere on the board) and it is just startling how F’ing confident this guy is.

    I dunno if we have seen this kind of QB-leadership-style since…..?

    He just f’ing ‘owns’ this team.

    Compare this (fairly or unfairly) to say, Bradford’s style. Or any other
    Ram QB. (and I’m not sayin you have to have this or that ‘style’
    but i am pointing out, Stafford’s confidence/style is startlingly
    ‘powerful’)

    in reply to: our reactions to the Lions game #133402
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I would take Kupp and Woods. Ike and Torry were artistes but I just prefer the K/W physicality. Plus Woods has all the instincts of a running back when he’s running with the ball. Sees lanes, knows how to cut, etc.

    I am actually feeling better about Jefferson this year. Last year he was much worse when it comes to being physical. I saw some alligator arms when he was catching in traffic last year. He’s not Woods or Kupp but he’s better than last year.

    In terms of the OL, I see it as both. Stafford is a type of qb who can help out an OL. But then at the same time this OL is much more consistently solid than last year. It’s a good OL. Best in years actually. Better than 2018 I think. So to me it’s both things–this is a qb who can help the OL, and this is a good OL in their own right on top of it. I think one key difference is Allen. Best center play by a Ram for a long time.

    ============

    I think i agree with all that…but think of what we’re saying on the Kupp/Woods
    thing — Ike and Torry are probly both gonna be in the Hall of Fame.

    And we’d probly take K/W.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Lions game #133391
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Watched the replay last night.

    Stafford and Goff head to head. Got to see what both do best, etc.
    Goff made some great throws as per usual, but he just cant
    zing the ball accurately to all corners of the field like Stafford.
    The talent difference is just striking.
    Goff is good, Stafford is elite. Makes a huge difference.

    I loved the Lion defense. They were all over the field, hitting hard,
    making great plays. Fierce, swarming, effort. Seems like they just
    need some weapons on offense and to get some guys healthy and they’ll be good.

    Kupp is fun to watch. Stafford’s talent really brings out the best
    in Kupp. I am still skeptical about Kupp lasting an entire season though.
    But if the rams make it into the playoffs healthy, I think they are the NFC
    favorites. I would not pick against them.

    I’m slightly disappointed in Van Jefferson. I was expecting him to get
    better separation, and be more physical. He’s ok, but not what i was
    hoping for.

    Looked like the Lions did a good job on Donald all game long,
    cept for one play, and that play cost them the game. Lions are cursed.

    The OLine is playing better than I expected, and its wonderful,
    but i think a lot of it has to do with Stafford. I think all the little
    things he does make all the other parts work better.

    Robert Woods just made a bunch of tough, hardnosed, football plays
    out there. Kupp and Woods might just be the most ‘complete’ WR pair
    the Rams have ever had. And that is saying a lot. Would you rather have
    Kupp and Woods or Ike and Torry? I dunno.

    Mark Sanchez is my new favorite announcer. I loved his insights
    on the game. A guy like Higby would make a catch, and Sanchez would point
    out that the route should have been crisper, etc. Good stuff.

    Dallas, Packers, Cards, Rams, Bucs — Some fine teams in the NFC.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Setting Up the Lions Massacre #133272
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    RAMs are 15 point favorites. 15 points. Thats ridiculous.
    The Lions have played a lot of games that could have gone either way.

    They had the RAVENS beat. A bad call cost them the game.

    That spread annoys me so much, I’m taking the Lions
    to win, outright.

    Lions rush for 200 yards, and win:

    Detroit 17
    Rams 13

    w
    v

    in reply to: Setting Up the Lions Massacre #133254
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “It’s easy (with Stafford) because what happens is if I’m wrong, he still has a chance of making it right. And those are the things you’re looking for. If it’s there in the timing and rhythm, let’s be as close to automatic as possible. But I think the guys that really separate themselves are the ones when it does go a little bit off-schedule, you have the ability to make it right.”
    And to my eye, Goff is not one of those guys…”
    ==========

    Its interesting that watching the vids from Goff’s college days, back
    when it was “Wentz vs Goff”, it sure looked to me, like Goffs
    STRENGTH was throwing off balance and making great ‘off schedule’ plays.
    Thats why I liked him.

    But in the Pros, it just didnt turn out that way.

    Now, it wouldnt surprise me, if down the road, as Goff matures
    and spends some time as a back-up (which is going to happen)
    he makes a comeback and plays very well for some good NFL team.

    But it sure dont look like he has the supporting cast to
    be good in Detroit.

    w
    v

    in reply to: political tweets #133234
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Little thread on the Dems.

    in reply to: political tweets #133200
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133193
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    (continued . . .)
    Throw in mass media, owned by plutocrats and oligarchs, and they desperately want the duopoly too, so they’re never going to really tell the truth about how horrible the GOP is relative to the horrible Dems..

    ==

    One of the things i think about, is this: If a critical-mass of people somehow,
    by magic, ‘woke up’ and developed a higher-political-consciousness, or
    ‘class consciousness’ or whatever you wanna call it — and there was a real
    possibility of the nation tipping toward actual-socialism — What do you think the Democrats would Do? Or, lets say the Dems had a choice between Socialism or Fascism — which way do you think they’d top?

    I know what ‘i’ think 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133192
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Whatever happened to all those people we used to post with. {sigh}.

    ==

    I think a lot of em were wearing horns
    in the capitalist building
    on Jan 6.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133175
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I basically agree with zooey.

    Dem-party cant topple the Rep-Party cause both
    are Capitalist-Parties. Essentially, that is it.

    They share fundamental capitalist ideology.
    It would be like asking capitalism to get rid of capitalism.

    How many Dems really seem like, ‘Dems’ anymore?
    How many Dems seem like ‘moderate’ Reps?
    Can anybody really tell the difference anymore?

    But there’s also this: Somewhere close to 35, 40 or maybe even close to 50 percent of the nation shares the Rep-Party version of Capitalism.
    Thats a lot of proto-fascism, or whatever you wanna call it.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Giants game #133169
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Did Jalen Ramsey even get targeted in that game?
    I havent heard a word about him.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Giants game #133168
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think people liked Woolford cuz they didnt like Goff.

    Now that the Rams have Stafford, I think
    the Woolfordites will change their tunes.

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 2,641 through 2,670 (of 12,319 total)