Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 9,901 through 9,930 (of 12,323 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: reporters & posters set up the GB game #32007
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Packers Podcast (plus Frank Sinatra)
    http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/331256171.html
    They start talking about the Rams at the 16:30 mark or so

    in reply to: I'm back. #31980
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It was tough. My computer died, and I had to wait a quite a few months to be able to get another one. It was very frustrating, being off for a long time.

    Yeah, i hate computers; Love the internet,
    though.

    Good to see you back,
    Jack.

    What do you think of Foles?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Nick Fairley #31968
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I agree there is a flaw in the Rams run defense. I’m just not sure if the flaw resides within the d-line. It very well may, but I don’t know.

    Can the issues be traced to individual players? Is it the scheme?

    When you give up big runs, every level of the defense is involved…d-line, LBs, safeties…

    =================

    Maybe GW’s defense in New Orleans was the same way. I dunno.
    They won a Ring there of course, but it was the Offense that
    carried that team — though as i recall the D got
    tons of turnovers. And bounties.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Nick Fairley #31965
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    That is a hell of a D line. Jeezus.

    Well, i dunno. They are still getting
    gouged by the run it looks like.
    Havent perused the stats on that though.

    w
    v

    Yeah. But it’s not like backs are consistently getting 5 yards a carry against them. They give up nothing for 10 plays and then get gouged by a 20 or 30 yarder. I think it’s also hard for us to always know who is at fault for the big runs…is it the DL or is it the LBs, etc.

    But we do see maddening breakdowns at times.

    Frustrating.

    Of course, all d-lines get gouged sometimes. Dorsett and Foreman had some big days against those great Rams d-lines of the 70’s.

    ===================

    Well all i know iz, this group aint the Sapp-Bucs or
    the Saragusa-Ravens. It aint that kind of ‘great.’

    Its dangerous and talented…and a bit flawed somehow,
    it seems.

    Would you rather have the 2015 Rams Defense
    or the 1999 Rams Defense?
    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Nick Fairley #31963
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    That is a hell of a D line. Jeezus.

    Well, i dunno. They are still getting
    gouged by the run it looks like.
    Havent perused the stats on that though.

    Its a strange team at this point. I think of the DLine
    as “very dangerous” but not really
    a “great DLine” in the sense of being
    dependable and complete.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Nick Fairley #31952
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    How come Simms is used so little?
    Is he hurt? I forget.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Prediction Thread: Green Bay Packers #31949
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I say MOB SQUAD UP BITCHES!!!!

    That’s a thing now – if we are gonna do a whole group think cult deal, we need to get on the same page. When I say “MOB SQUAD UP BITCHES” you will all fall in a deeply relaxed sleep. When I snap my fingers you will awake and have an overwhelming urge to send me your money. I take cash, check, credit cards and even your mommas dentures if they got gold in em.

    ======================

    Just woke up. Thought that said “Mob Squid Britches!”

    I cannot even begin to tell you
    the confusion that ensued.

    w
    v
    Britches
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_Riverside_1985_laboratory_raid

    in reply to: Prediction Thread: Green Bay Packers #31937
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I will be very curious to see how much
    intensity the Rams can generate,
    after the intense win at Arizona.

    I’m thinkin this will look a lot
    like the Washington game.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Hav's Fumble recovery… #31936
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well that was just a great and fierce
    play by the rookie, Hav.

    While Saffold and Greg Robinson just
    stood there.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Prediction Thread: Green Bay Packers #31929
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    And, Nittany isn’t REALLY a Flamer, is he? Nah, can’t be. You guys are mistaking him for someone else, I’m thinkin.

    Good eye, NE. Your suspicions are correct. I’m not a flamer, and wv and zooey are just bitter little men. Bitter, bitter little men.

    But you saw them for what they are right away, and for that I am thankful.

    =========================

    Hey dont lump me in with
    Zooey “preheat the oven to 350 for hardbacks” Deadalus.
    I didnt say who was the flamer, exactly.
    I left it open to interpretation.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Prediction Thread: Green Bay Packers #31925
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think Green Bay is going to look back on this game as their most humbling of the season.

    Because they so thoroughly destroy the Rams that they begin to question a lifestyle driven by violence so they join a Tibetan monastery where they take a vow of humility?

    Boy, do I know how to bait the trap for Raiders fans, or what.

    It’s amazing that trolls keep coming to this board in spite of round after round of humiliation at my hands.

    ==========================

    Maybe ZN1 should start up “rate the flamer” again.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Prediction Thread: Green Bay Packers #31924
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The two teams have met each other 93 times (including 2 postseason games), with the Green Bay Packers winning 45 games and the Rams winning 46 games. They have also tied 2 times.

    Packers have averaged 30 points per game in their last 3 meetings (A-Rod as QB).

    Foles is 1-0 as a starter in GB, but A-Rod was hurt in that game…, Seneca Wallace was the starter, and he got knocked out in that game.

    The last time the Rams won in GB was in 2006, when Marc Bulger was QB.

    I love my Rams, but

    GB 23
    Rams 14

    some history
    http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/packers-have-storied-history-with-rams-b99588945z1-331030041.html

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The 11 games immediately after the bye:

    Cleveland
    San Francisco
    @ Minnesota
    Chicago
    @ Baltimore
    @ Cincinnati
    Arizona
    Detroit
    Tampa Bay
    @ Seattle
    @ San Francisco

    Suddenly it doesn’t look so tough.

    =======================

    That Raven game might just have to be
    played under the Thunderdome.

    w
    v

    in reply to: multi-media player-fest thread: Gurley, Foles, Bailey, tba #31898
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    All 22: Gurley’s 52-Yard Run
    Insider Myles Simmons breaks down Todd Gurley’s 52-yard run in last Sunday’s road victory over the Cardinals.

    http://www.stlouisrams.com/videos/videos/All-22-Gurleys-52-Yard-Run/b73e2759-6b9d-4e19-b04e-12cc38540798

    Good breakdown by Simmons. He’s a good communicator.

    I think we all have a sense that Tavon and Gurley together,
    are better than either Tavon or Gurley by themselves.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I agree with Charles Davis — they dont have to beat GBay,
    but they have to beat Cleveland in two weeks.
    Gotta be 3 and 3 at the bye.
    Gotta start beating the nonplayoff teams.

    w
    v

    in reply to: old & new power rankings…through Week 8 #31895
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So the two teams the Rams lost to are rated below them, and the two teams they beat are rated above them.

    And that, in a nutshell, is our beloved Rams.

    ———————
    Well, i think they’ve turned the corner — which means,
    they will finally start losing to good teams
    and beating the bad teams.

    w
    v

    in reply to: WOW … (official Cards game after-thread) #31859
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I watched the game on Replay. I may have to watch it again,
    cause I was being distracted by a large squirrel and a blue jay,
    but what I did take away from the game was:

    1 The Rams and Cards play Steeler-Raven level,
    brutal, hard-hitting, old-school football.
    Man, what a brutal game. I must say, I enjoy
    hard-hitting football. I’m a cave-man, i guess.
    It would not surprise me, if both teams are feeling a bit
    ‘beat-up’ going into their next game.
    My favorite plays from the game were not the TD’s or Long runs,
    but the Hits. TJ’s hits especially. Even Janoris was hitting
    hard. (the JJ INT was awesome, of course — is that guy finally
    playing up to his potential? He seems to be playing smarter so far)

    2 All the usual Ram weaknesses were on display in that game. The defense got
    gouged by the Run and the pass. The offense was abysmal for most of the game.
    I was not impressed with a lot of what i saw in the first OR
    second half. But the one thing that ‘was’ indeed new was — Gurley.
    He may very well change the dynamic a bit. He may be
    the difference between 7/8 wins or 9/10 wins. BUT, he’s gotta
    hold on to the ball.

    3 I was impressed with the way Foles avoided any game-killing
    mistakes and he did make some killer throws. He is NOT
    Kellen Clemens or Austin Davis. He’s no Carson Palmer, or Russel Wilson
    but he’s not a second-stringer either.

    4 I would say the key to the game was simply the Rams Defensive
    speed and pressure. It seemed to throw the Cardinal offense off,
    ‘juusssssst’ enough for a few passes to be rushed and a few passes
    to be dropped. I mean, the Cards were obviously game, and not intimidated,
    but the Ram D rattled them just enough to cause a few mistakes, in the
    cardinal machine. The best example was Palmers last pass — the WR was
    open and it would have been an easy pass to complete, and the WR was
    well within winning-Field-goal range — but Palmer was just a bit off.
    That was the game.

    5 I’d love to see this defense have Gaines and Ogletree. But I ‘think’
    they can still be a top five D without them. I think.

    6 Every-time a defender was around Tavon, the defender was taking aim
    at the ball, trying to strip it. I was holding my breath watching
    the slo-motion replays.

    7 Normally, I’d say Aaron Rogers is just gonna torch the Rams,
    but…there is the Gurley factor, now. Maybe, just, maybe
    he can shorten the game…. I dunno.

    w
    v

    in reply to: week 5 stats, including "Rams have played 3 top 5 defenses" #31840
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Agamemnon wrote:
    … The Washington game still really bothers me. We need to win those games.

    The Steelers game bothers me more…

    ==============================
    Well apparently, this is the: ‘What game bothers you’ thread.

    I am bothered by the 1969, 23-20, playoff
    loss to the Vikings.

    Still.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Seahawks Monday Night Miracle II #31839
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Enh. Woulda been a BS call, imho.

    Chancellor made another all-pro play — keep the BS
    calls out of the game.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams expected to sign Dunbar #31814
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, its not like losing Foles,
    but it really sux.
    Dunbar is no Ogletree. HE’s a weak-link.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Tweets 10/5 #31813
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Jim Thomas Verified account
    ‏@jthom1

    MLB James Laurinaitis, who appeared to be used more as blitzer than usual, had a sack and 3 QB hits.

    in reply to: Rams News Recap: Oct. 4 #31767
    Avatar photowv
    Participant
    in reply to: WOW … (official Cards game after-thread) #31705
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Oh Yeah.

    Awesome.

    I just watched the highlights
    at NFL.com. Looking forward to watching
    the game on replay.

    Huge road win against an excellent team.

    Not the same ole sorry-ass-fisher rams,
    apparently.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Nihilistic Password Security Questions. #31688
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    🙂

    in reply to: CoachO & others on the Rams receivers #31687
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well i havent read anyone say Stedman “doesn’t get separation” —
    I have read people say he doesn’t get ‘targeted’ — which is different.

    Its still a bit early for ME to say what Foles is or isn’t.
    I dont expect much from any QB when they have zero
    running game and a Newbie-Oline.

    I ‘think’ he’ll be ‘fine.’ He’ll drive people crazy
    with some inaccurate passes to wide open receivers,
    and just when yer ready to cuss him out,
    he’ll drive the team down the field at
    crunch time. Thats my ‘guess’ as to who
    he is, more or less.

    He’s not a top-five-QB, thats for sure.
    But I think he can be a winner.

    And, fwiw, I think i would take him
    over Sam. I think. I just like his
    pocket-awerenss-and-movement-skills more than Sams.

    w
    v

    in reply to: fwiw some PFF grades #31680
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Interesting about Long, being ranked
    that high

    w
    v

    in reply to: aaron donald – otherworldly #31634
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, thats nice and all, but the ‘unit’
    has to start stopping the Run. Donald included.

    Ya know.

    This is a strange team. I said
    that last year, and its even
    stranger this year.

    w
    v

    in reply to: So House Republicans finally created a job today #31627
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I don’t think either Sanders or Trump will get the nomination. The DNC isn’t going to want Sanders, and the Super Delegates aren’t going to want Sanders. The RNC isn’t going to want Trump.

    I dunno.

    Clinton v. Rubio? Or Biden if he runs?

    This is an interesting horse race. While there is a lot of popular desire for an “outsider” this cycle, all of the outsiders appear kooky to the mainstream. You know, Obama managed to be an establishment guy who convinced voters he was Fresh Blood. I just don’t see a candidate this time who can replicate that. Sanders and Trump are not establishment guys, and the establishment, as well as the majority of American voters, do not want to go that far afield. As you know, even a lot of the Liberal Democrats are conservative. Can you imagine Waterfield voting for Sanders? I can’t. He will feel more comfortable with Biden or Clinton.

    It’s gonna be an interesting 6 months.

    BTW, I read somewhere that Boehner could lock up financing for the rest of Obama’s term before he leaves, thus preventing a government shutdown even after he is gone. I didn’t read the details on that, but that would be an interesting move.

    You are probably right,
    but then, I didnt expect Bernie (or trump) to do
    nearly as well as they’ve been doing — so, I dunno.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Oregon shootings #31626
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    More people in U.S. killed by shootings in my lifetime than were killed in all U.S. wars combined…

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/jan/18/mark-shields/pbs-commentator-mark-shields-says-more-killed-guns/

    I would not have guessed that.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Givens traded to Baltimore for future pick… #31623
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, we all KNOW whats going to happen now.

    I mean, i don’t even have to type it.

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 9,901 through 9,930 (of 12,323 total)