Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipantPackers Podcast (plus Frank Sinatra)
http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/331256171.html
They start talking about the Rams at the 16:30 mark or so
wvParticipantIt was tough. My computer died, and I had to wait a quite a few months to be able to get another one. It was very frustrating, being off for a long time.
Yeah, i hate computers; Love the internet,
though.Good to see you back,
Jack.What do you think of Foles?
w
v
wvParticipantI agree there is a flaw in the Rams run defense. I’m just not sure if the flaw resides within the d-line. It very well may, but I don’t know.
Can the issues be traced to individual players? Is it the scheme?
When you give up big runs, every level of the defense is involved…d-line, LBs, safeties…
=================
Maybe GW’s defense in New Orleans was the same way. I dunno.
They won a Ring there of course, but it was the Offense that
carried that team — though as i recall the D got
tons of turnovers. And bounties.w
v
wvParticipantThat is a hell of a D line. Jeezus.
Well, i dunno. They are still getting
gouged by the run it looks like.
Havent perused the stats on that though.w
vYeah. But it’s not like backs are consistently getting 5 yards a carry against them. They give up nothing for 10 plays and then get gouged by a 20 or 30 yarder. I think it’s also hard for us to always know who is at fault for the big runs…is it the DL or is it the LBs, etc.
But we do see maddening breakdowns at times.
Frustrating.
Of course, all d-lines get gouged sometimes. Dorsett and Foreman had some big days against those great Rams d-lines of the 70’s.
===================
Well all i know iz, this group aint the Sapp-Bucs or
the Saragusa-Ravens. It aint that kind of ‘great.’Its dangerous and talented…and a bit flawed somehow,
it seems.Would you rather have the 2015 Rams Defense
or the 1999 Rams Defense?
w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantThat is a hell of a D line. Jeezus.
Well, i dunno. They are still getting
gouged by the run it looks like.
Havent perused the stats on that though.Its a strange team at this point. I think of the DLine
as “very dangerous” but not really
a “great DLine” in the sense of being
dependable and complete.w
v
wvParticipantHow come Simms is used so little?
Is he hurt? I forget.w
v
wvParticipantI say MOB SQUAD UP BITCHES!!!!
That’s a thing now – if we are gonna do a whole group think cult deal, we need to get on the same page. When I say “MOB SQUAD UP BITCHES” you will all fall in a deeply relaxed sleep. When I snap my fingers you will awake and have an overwhelming urge to send me your money. I take cash, check, credit cards and even your mommas dentures if they got gold in em.
======================
Just woke up. Thought that said “Mob Squid Britches!”
I cannot even begin to tell you
the confusion that ensued.w
v
Britches
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_Riverside_1985_laboratory_raid
wvParticipantI will be very curious to see how much
intensity the Rams can generate,
after the intense win at Arizona.I’m thinkin this will look a lot
like the Washington game.w
v
wvParticipantWell that was just a great and fierce
play by the rookie, Hav.While Saffold and Greg Robinson just
stood there.w
v
wvParticipantAnd, Nittany isn’t REALLY a Flamer, is he? Nah, can’t be. You guys are mistaking him for someone else, I’m thinkin.
Good eye, NE. Your suspicions are correct. I’m not a flamer, and wv and zooey are just bitter little men. Bitter, bitter little men.
But you saw them for what they are right away, and for that I am thankful.
=========================
Hey dont lump me in with
Zooey “preheat the oven to 350 for hardbacks” Deadalus.
I didnt say who was the flamer, exactly.
I left it open to interpretation.w
v
wvParticipantI think Green Bay is going to look back on this game as their most humbling of the season.
Because they so thoroughly destroy the Rams that they begin to question a lifestyle driven by violence so they join a Tibetan monastery where they take a vow of humility?
Boy, do I know how to bait the trap for Raiders fans, or what.
It’s amazing that trolls keep coming to this board in spite of round after round of humiliation at my hands.
==========================
Maybe ZN1 should start up “rate the flamer” again.
w
v
wvParticipantThe two teams have met each other 93 times (including 2 postseason games), with the Green Bay Packers winning 45 games and the Rams winning 46 games. They have also tied 2 times.
Packers have averaged 30 points per game in their last 3 meetings (A-Rod as QB).
Foles is 1-0 as a starter in GB, but A-Rod was hurt in that game…, Seneca Wallace was the starter, and he got knocked out in that game.
The last time the Rams won in GB was in 2006, when Marc Bulger was QB.
I love my Rams, but
GB 23
Rams 14some history
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/packers-have-storied-history-with-rams-b99588945z1-331030041.htmlOctober 7, 2015 at 8:54 am in reply to: 101, 10/6 … Wagoner, Clayton, Tony Boselli, Charles Davis #31901
wvParticipantThe 11 games immediately after the bye:
Cleveland
San Francisco
@ Minnesota
Chicago
@ Baltimore
@ Cincinnati
Arizona
Detroit
Tampa Bay
@ Seattle
@ San FranciscoSuddenly it doesn’t look so tough.
=======================
That Raven game might just have to be
played under the Thunderdome.w
vOctober 7, 2015 at 8:30 am in reply to: multi-media player-fest thread: Gurley, Foles, Bailey, tba #31898
wvParticipantAll 22: Gurley’s 52-Yard Run
Insider Myles Simmons breaks down Todd Gurley’s 52-yard run in last Sunday’s road victory over the Cardinals.Good breakdown by Simmons. He’s a good communicator.
I think we all have a sense that Tavon and Gurley together,
are better than either Tavon or Gurley by themselves.w
vOctober 7, 2015 at 8:22 am in reply to: 101, 10/6 … Wagoner, Clayton, Tony Boselli, Charles Davis #31896
wvParticipantI agree with Charles Davis — they dont have to beat GBay,
but they have to beat Cleveland in two weeks.
Gotta be 3 and 3 at the bye.
Gotta start beating the nonplayoff teams.w
v
wvParticipantSo the two teams the Rams lost to are rated below them, and the two teams they beat are rated above them.
And that, in a nutshell, is our beloved Rams.
———————
Well, i think they’ve turned the corner — which means,
they will finally start losing to good teams
and beating the bad teams.w
v
wvParticipantI watched the game on Replay. I may have to watch it again,
cause I was being distracted by a large squirrel and a blue jay,
but what I did take away from the game was:1 The Rams and Cards play Steeler-Raven level,
brutal, hard-hitting, old-school football.
Man, what a brutal game. I must say, I enjoy
hard-hitting football. I’m a cave-man, i guess.
It would not surprise me, if both teams are feeling a bit
‘beat-up’ going into their next game.
My favorite plays from the game were not the TD’s or Long runs,
but the Hits. TJ’s hits especially. Even Janoris was hitting
hard. (the JJ INT was awesome, of course — is that guy finally
playing up to his potential? He seems to be playing smarter so far)2 All the usual Ram weaknesses were on display in that game. The defense got
gouged by the Run and the pass. The offense was abysmal for most of the game.
I was not impressed with a lot of what i saw in the first OR
second half. But the one thing that ‘was’ indeed new was — Gurley.
He may very well change the dynamic a bit. He may be
the difference between 7/8 wins or 9/10 wins. BUT, he’s gotta
hold on to the ball.3 I was impressed with the way Foles avoided any game-killing
mistakes and he did make some killer throws. He is NOT
Kellen Clemens or Austin Davis. He’s no Carson Palmer, or Russel Wilson
but he’s not a second-stringer either.4 I would say the key to the game was simply the Rams Defensive
speed and pressure. It seemed to throw the Cardinal offense off,
‘juusssssst’ enough for a few passes to be rushed and a few passes
to be dropped. I mean, the Cards were obviously game, and not intimidated,
but the Ram D rattled them just enough to cause a few mistakes, in the
cardinal machine. The best example was Palmers last pass — the WR was
open and it would have been an easy pass to complete, and the WR was
well within winning-Field-goal range — but Palmer was just a bit off.
That was the game.5 I’d love to see this defense have Gaines and Ogletree. But I ‘think’
they can still be a top five D without them. I think.6 Every-time a defender was around Tavon, the defender was taking aim
at the ball, trying to strip it. I was holding my breath watching
the slo-motion replays.7 Normally, I’d say Aaron Rogers is just gonna torch the Rams,
but…there is the Gurley factor, now. Maybe, just, maybe
he can shorten the game…. I dunno.w
vOctober 6, 2015 at 10:06 am in reply to: week 5 stats, including "Rams have played 3 top 5 defenses" #31840
wvParticipantAgamemnon wrote:
… The Washington game still really bothers me. We need to win those games.The Steelers game bothers me more…
==============================
Well apparently, this is the: ‘What game bothers you’ thread.I am bothered by the 1969, 23-20, playoff
loss to the Vikings.Still.
w
v
wvParticipantEnh. Woulda been a BS call, imho.
Chancellor made another all-pro play — keep the BS
calls out of the game.w
v
wvParticipantWell, its not like losing Foles,
but it really sux.
Dunbar is no Ogletree. HE’s a weak-link.w
v
wvParticipantJim Thomas Verified account
@jthom1MLB James Laurinaitis, who appeared to be used more as blitzer than usual, had a sack and 3 QB hits.
wvParticipant
wvParticipantOh Yeah.
Awesome.
I just watched the highlights
at NFL.com. Looking forward to watching
the game on replay.Huge road win against an excellent team.
Not the same ole sorry-ass-fisher rams,
apparently.w
v
wvParticipant🙂
wvParticipantWell i havent read anyone say Stedman “doesn’t get separation” —
I have read people say he doesn’t get ‘targeted’ — which is different.Its still a bit early for ME to say what Foles is or isn’t.
I dont expect much from any QB when they have zero
running game and a Newbie-Oline.I ‘think’ he’ll be ‘fine.’ He’ll drive people crazy
with some inaccurate passes to wide open receivers,
and just when yer ready to cuss him out,
he’ll drive the team down the field at
crunch time. Thats my ‘guess’ as to who
he is, more or less.He’s not a top-five-QB, thats for sure.
But I think he can be a winner.And, fwiw, I think i would take him
over Sam. I think. I just like his
pocket-awerenss-and-movement-skills more than Sams.w
v
wvParticipantInteresting about Long, being ranked
that highw
v
wvParticipantWell, thats nice and all, but the ‘unit’
has to start stopping the Run. Donald included.Ya know.
This is a strange team. I said
that last year, and its even
stranger this year.w
v
wvParticipantI don’t think either Sanders or Trump will get the nomination. The DNC isn’t going to want Sanders, and the Super Delegates aren’t going to want Sanders. The RNC isn’t going to want Trump.
I dunno.
Clinton v. Rubio? Or Biden if he runs?
This is an interesting horse race. While there is a lot of popular desire for an “outsider” this cycle, all of the outsiders appear kooky to the mainstream. You know, Obama managed to be an establishment guy who convinced voters he was Fresh Blood. I just don’t see a candidate this time who can replicate that. Sanders and Trump are not establishment guys, and the establishment, as well as the majority of American voters, do not want to go that far afield. As you know, even a lot of the Liberal Democrats are conservative. Can you imagine Waterfield voting for Sanders? I can’t. He will feel more comfortable with Biden or Clinton.
It’s gonna be an interesting 6 months.
BTW, I read somewhere that Boehner could lock up financing for the rest of Obama’s term before he leaves, thus preventing a government shutdown even after he is gone. I didn’t read the details on that, but that would be an interesting move.
You are probably right,
but then, I didnt expect Bernie (or trump) to do
nearly as well as they’ve been doing — so, I dunno.w
v
wvParticipantMore people in U.S. killed by shootings in my lifetime than were killed in all U.S. wars combined…
I would not have guessed that.
w
v
wvParticipantWell, we all KNOW whats going to happen now.
I mean, i don’t even have to type it.
w
v -
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

