Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 9,811 through 9,840 (of 12,323 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Remaining Schedule #33317
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    call me crazy, but i think the rams gotta chance next week. but they gotta slow ap down.

    When’s the last time a
    Ram team with a Winning Record
    had a big game against
    another team with a Winning Record?

    I think RFL’s point about the passing game
    comes into play against the Vikes.
    Against a ‘good team’ the Rams just
    cant be one dimensional.
    They’ll need some consistent play
    from Foles and the Oline, one would think.
    But the Vikes aint exactly the Patriots.
    This one is winnable.

    w
    v

    in reply to: 49ers vs Rams: posts about the game #33310
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Nick Wagoner ‏@nwagoner 2h2 hours ago
    And like that, Gurley has it. Per ESPN Stats & Info, Todd Gurley now has the most rushing yards by a runner in 1st 4 starts since merger.

    You know i was not expecting this. I thought he’d
    be good, but not this year. I figured
    he wouldnt really be a difference maker
    until the second year after the surgery.

    Just….wow.

    His vision is great. And he is so smooth
    for a big guy. He doesn’t really remind
    me of anyone.

    w
    v

    in reply to: 49ers vs Rams: posts about the game #33306
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Kaepernick killed one mole, although he chased many.

    Ugliest Show on Turf? …or..GSOT – Gurleyest Show on Turf ? 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: 49ers vs Rams: posts about the game #33303
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams invented “winning ugliER.”

    U.S.O.T.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Prediction Thread – The Francisco 49ers #33282
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    This is a MUST win game if the Rams have any hope for the playoffs.

    The Panthers or Falcons will grab one of the wild card spots–the other wins their division.

    That leaves one wild card or the division for the Rams to win.

    If the Rams stumble here–in a game they SHOULD win–they’re done. If they DO win they set up a critical game against the Vikes. These are the games where seasons are made or lost.

    So we’ll see.

    ===================

    Yes.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Color Rush #33280
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Do i have to say it.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Not clear yet if McDonald will play #33270
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    And maybe some Marlboros.
    w
    v

    My God wv, these are children!

    They better be ultra lites.

    I had about a hundred kids, as usual.
    Only one Wolverine. One Dr Who.
    Many spidermen. Many bloody zombies.
    Lots of video-game characters.
    Fairies. A wizard or two. An executioner.
    An FBI agent.
    My favorite was A boy in a suit with a horse-head.
    I dunno why, but that one was scary.

    About one out of five said thank-you.

    None of the traditional old-school monsters.
    Sigh. No Frankenstein, Dracula, Wolf-Man,
    Mummy or Creature of the Black Lagoon.
    No Peter Giunta.

    Go rams.
    w
    v

    in reply to: Not clear yet if McDonald will play #33258
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams’ T.J. McDonald: Returns to full practice

    http://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/football/news/rams-tj-mcdonald-returns-to-full-practice/

    Despite returning to a full practice Friday, McDonald (shoulder) is listed as questionable for Sunday’s game against the 49ers, Jim Thomas of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports.

    The Rams have a bunch of players listed as questionable that don’t actually seem to be in much danger of missing the game. McDonald, who is on pace for 96 tackles, should be available against the flailing San Francisco offense.

    =====================

    He’s old school;
    he’ll play.

    I used a semi-colon there, btw.
    I want credit for that.

    Trick-or-Treat starts in 29 minutes
    in my neighborhood. I’m giving
    out plastic dinosaurs along
    with corporate candy. Twizzlers
    and zagnuts mainly. Some nerds
    as well.
    And maybe some Marlboros.
    w
    v

    in reply to: Hey wv #33246
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah, he’s not old-school. Woody Hayes
    would have decked him.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, this season the Rams have lost to two teams they should have beaten. They lost to Washington on the road and Pittsburgh at home. Yes, the Pittsburgh game is a game they should have won. They had them at home and knocked Rothlisberger out of the game. They beat one team they should have (Browns). So this year so far they are 1-2 in games they should have won. So, what Laurinaitis says is true only if beating the Browns is the start of a trend. But that’s something nobody can know as of yet.

    —————————

    I agree.

    I will be very very disappointed if they lose
    at home, to a crumbling mess like the 49ers
    which is 31st in defense and 32nd in offense.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Merlin

    Our passing game is still sputtering through 6 games. The main problem is the line. They have been allowing far too much penetration on both run and pass plays and it is affecting everything else.

    Run blocking has improved the most, but it has also benefitted from an elite talent running through the holes. Gurley gives them a little more room for error, and his ability to bust big runs has allowed for a very good YPC average, masking the fact that they still have a ways to go as a line (IMO they need to limit the penetration much more consistently).

    And this is something that should scare other teams on our schedule too, since the OL has yet to really put together a dominant, full-60 effort. What will Gurley’s game stats look like when that happens?

    Pass blocking is hit and miss. The line had some great snaps against both Seattle and AZ, only to get overrun in pass pro when Washington and Cleveland stacked the LOS and brought the heat. That more than anything else is their issue.

    From there, I do think scheme has been part of it. When they go with the shotgun on obvious passing downs defenses do not buy the play action which means Foles is throwing into the teeth of a defense that is dropping LBs deep and cluttering up the passing lanes. If the line was good enough that wouldn’t matter as much, but they’re not there yet and that delay on the reads is hurting Foles’ ability to get that ball out.

    Cigs needs to put Foles under center and run play action on those third and long plays because teams are going to respect the play action no matter how bad the down/distance is given how good Gurley is. Lastly, more slants and vertical hot reads are needed. Cigs has gotten far too comfortable with the horizontal hots and checkdowns.

    ======================

    I think i agree with all
    of that.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    For me, 7 and 9 teams on the road are included
    in the “teams u should beat category.”
    As well as eight and eight teams.

    But for me, I’m not looking at who they are ‘favored’
    over — I’m looking at “who should you beat
    IF you are going to be considered a good/solid team

    So far, the past gazillion years,
    and to state the obvious,
    they have ‘not’ been
    a good solid team.

    And we agree on the ‘reasons’ they
    havent been a good team.

    This year they have more high-level-talent
    and experience than in years past.
    At least they do everywhere but the Oline.

    w
    v

    in reply to: 2016 NFL Draft order and needs for every team #33188
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Seriously? You would draft DEFENSE with the first and second picks?

    w
    v

    I draft players. Me and Snead draft players, not positions. I might use the first 3 picks on defense, depending on how the draft plays out. It is sort of like, did we need Donald when we drafted him? When I draft, talent trumps, especially in the first 2 rounds. Talent and my opinion.

    Ok. But i kinda thot DT was pretty close
    to a ‘need’ last year. But i get what yer saying.

    I’m hoping need and talent line up in the
    next draft.

    The offseason is gonna be ‘very’ inter esting,
    what with Chris Long, and Janoris and Barron
    and Saffold, etc up for grabs.

    What’s yer opinion on keeping or jettisoning
    Chris Long?

    My own view is, if Snisher thinks they are
    seriously in the running for a Ring next year,
    then keep him. …i bet Belichex would dump him.

    w
    v

    w
    v

    in reply to: 2016 NFL Draft order and needs for every team #33180
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The way this years draft lays out. I am going best CB, best DE, TE, then WR, in that order. I might take two if good ones are available. I won’t pass on Cook, if he is there. It is early, but right now that looks like it maximizes the talent and it is independent of whoever I can sign as FAs. ps I am cutting Cook.

    Seriously? You would draft DEFENSE with the first and second picks?

    w
    v

    in reply to: The Stats on the WRs #33179
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Kenny Britt leads the Rams in Receiving yards.

    He’s ranked number 86 in the NFL. 224 yards.

    Tavon is ranked 106 — 187 yards.
    Cook is 105 — 188 yards.

    Stedman is at 119 — 169 yards

    Not exactly the GSOT

    My view? All of the guys listed except Tavon did better last year.

    Tavon improved this year, so, that’s different.

    So if they all did better last year, who are they? Is it right to assume this right now IS what they am?

    Quick hasn’t re-climbed his ladder back to who he was in 2014. Maybe he won’t but I say odds favor him doing it.

    Britt and Cook can be better than what they’ve been this year so far. Particularly Cook, who is just in this massive confidence crisis. A revived Cook is not going to set the world on fire, though still, it IS better.

    Stedman too. Kendricks too.

    It’s still not the GSOT, but if they’ve been better before, why can’t they get back to it?

    An out of sync offense will have symptoms. One is that EVERYBODY plays with less confidence and precision. And, sync-ness CAN be gotten back in-to. They can smooth this out with some experience together.

    Just IMO. Or, more explicitly, my own opinion based on what the football gods told me was absolute truths. So you know it’s an informed opinion.

    ..

    =======================
    Yeah, I agree with that, basically, but I’m not a hundred-percent sure.
    I ‘think’ they are a ‘good enough’ group. Or will be.

    But right now, this passing offense: QB, OLine, Receivers — is abominable.
    Heinous, even.
    Vile and reprehensible.

    Its icky.

    I dont like it. I dont wanna watch it.

    I think they should get in an
    electric-football-wedge and just
    give it to Gurley. Put Tavon
    behing Gurley and they can
    include laterals in the offense.

    Strange thing is, i was praising this passing attack
    after the Seattle game. I thought they attacked
    the middle with medium passes in that game.
    The OLine help up just enough to do some of that.
    Now, though, I think Cignetti has just given
    up on medium passes cause of the Oline fiasco.
    I mean Foles is NOT gonna last the season
    if he keeps getting pounded. They know that.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams News Recap: Oct. 28 #33177
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I enjoyed the Laurinaitis vid
    http://www.rams-news.com/james-laurinaitis-blocks-like-austins-elevates-the-team-video/

    He talks about 49ers vs Rams as “old school football”

    He says “if we wanna be different” we’ve got to win this one.

    w
    v

    in reply to: The Stats on the WRs #33176
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>Let’s see: Top 10 reasons:
    We don’t run very many offensive plays.
    New QB
    New coordinator
    New system?
    New offensive line
    Too many dropped passes
    Can’t get open
    We traded Givins
    Cook sux 😉
    #10 ????? Fisher hates offenses. A FG is a win.</span>

    <span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>The RB Gordon has more fumbles than Pead. 😉</span>

    Well i say we trade all the receivers
    for RG3 and a field goal kicker.

    w
    v

    in reply to: what some SF fans are saying #33167
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I wonder who Foles has lunch with?

    w
    v
    ———————————————-
    http://blog.sfgate.com/49ers/

    49ers appear united, and could we a change after the bye week?
    By Kevin Lynch on October 28, 2015 at 2:59 PM

    Colin Kaepernick breezed through the locker room and past a small group of reporters.

    “Hey,” Kaepernick called out, “Who do you guys have lunch with?”

    Kaepernick was poking harmless fun at the news conference he just concluded when he was asked who he lunches with.

    The question was prompted by a national report saying that Kaepernick was on an island in the 49ers’ locker room.

    “Kap isn’t on a damn island,” wide receiver Torrey Smith told a gaggle of reporters unprompted.

    If the 49ers are fracturing in the wake of a 2-5 start, they didn’t show it on Wednesday, in fact they put up a convincing show of unity, with Smith leading the charge.

    “If anyone is going to be mad, it’s going to be the receivers,” Smith said about the team’s start and Kaepernick’s struggles. “And we’re fine.”

    For the record, Kaepernick lunches with fellow quarterbacks and offensive linemen Alex Boone and Joe Staley.

    When asked to address the report on being on an island, Kaepernick said, “No, I have a great relationship with my teammates. To me, that’s a situation where I don’t know what the agenda is saying that or what the credibility of that source is.”
    The report from Jay Glazer brought up memories from last year of unnamed sources that undercut then coach Jim Harbaugh.

    Under cutting Kaepernick now could be a motivation since the 49ers might want to get a look at backup quarterback Blaine Gabbert before determining whether to pay Kaepernick $16 million in bonuses and salary next year. Also, if Kaepernick sustains a horrible injury, the 49ers would owe him $61 million.

    But the decision on whether Kaepernick sits or plays is up to one man – the loyal Jim Tomsula. The new coach doesn’t have final say over the roster, the draft, or player acquisition. He does have final say on who will start on game days, and right now his starter at quarterback is Kaepernick.

    As we have seen, Tomsula doesn’t like to make changes. He once said that he doesn’t want his players to feel like they are “disposable.”

    Tomsula has also said twice that changes could be made, but then little happens. The only switch has been the introduction of Andrew Tiller at right guard on a rotating basis. And from what Tomsula said Wednesday, it doesn’t appear if a shake up is expected this week.

    However, all this could change in a few weeks. The 49ers play in St. Louis on Sunday, and they host Atlanta before arriving at their bye week. At that time, center Daniel Kilgore is expected to return, which could provide a perfect opportunity to start a new quarterback.

    But in the mean time, there appears to be support for the embattled Kaepernick. But just how long with that support last?

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    At about the 4:40 mark, they show Ram highlights

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: what some SF fans are saying #33148
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Will Jim Tomsula eventually have to bench Colin Kaepernick?

    Who besides Kaepernick can kill the moles?

    This is the same QB who led SF to consecutive playoff wins
    over the Packers. And now he’s a mole-killer ?
    How does that happen?

    “…Ted Thompson on Colin Kaepernick: Oh my, that was special
    Posted by Josh Alper on January 13, 2013, 11:20 AM EDT
    San Francisco 49ers quarterback Kaepernick scrambles away from Green Bay Packers Neal in their NFL NFC Divisional playoff football game in San Francisco Reuters

    The Packers left San Francisco as 45-31 losers to the 49ers and members of the Colin Kaepernick admiration society.

    Watching Kaepernick light up the defense for 263 passing yards and 181 rushing yards, the most ever by an NFL quarterback, left the architect of the Packers team sounding more impressed by Kaepernick than he was upset at his team’s efforts. Packers General Manager Ted Thompson knew the hype on Kaepernick, but said that the real thing went beyond the advance billing.

    “That was unbelievable,” Thompson said, via Jason Cole of Yahoo! Sports. “He did everything. I mean, I had read the press clippings and seen some of the highlights. But to watch what he did … oh my, that was special.”….
    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/13/ted-thompson-on-colin-kaepernick-oh-my-that-was-special/

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well….why not 🙂

    Its kinda hard to totally screw up a sports movie,
    and its also kinda hard to make a really good one.
    Ya know. The plots are all prettymuch the same.

    w
    v

    in reply to: what some SF fans are saying #33142
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    SF is a bad team, but like most bad teams
    they can rise up and play well now and then.
    Interestingly their defense gave up 43 pts to Pitt,
    and then 47 points to Ariz — and then they came
    out and limited the Packers to 17 points.

    Remember when SF was one play from winning the Super Bowl?
    Wasn’t that long ago. And Kaepernik was the QB. He was a Star.
    Now he’s a bum. Funny what happens when the RB leaves and the OLine
    falls apart.

    1 9/14 vs. Min W 20-3
    2 9/20 @ Pit L 43-18
    3 9/27 @ Ari L 47-7
    4 10/4 vs. GB L 17-3
    5 10/11 @ NYG L 30-27
    6 10/18 vs. Bal W 25-20
    7 10/22 vs. Sea L 20-3
    8 11/1 @ StL 10:00 AM PT

    —————-
    http://blog.sfgate.com/49ers/2015/10/26/will-jim-tomsula-eventually-have-to-bench-colin-kaepernick/
    Will Jim Tomsula eventually have to bench Colin Kaepernick?
    By Kevin Lynch on October 26, 2015 at 5:31 AM

    Colin Kaepernick on an island in the locker room? (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

    Colin Kaepernick on an island in the locker room? (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

    Rumors are swirling around the embattled 49ers, which is almost expected after five corrosive losses. Whispers of momentous changes on this team have been in the air and on Sunday, Fox’s Jay Glazer reported that quarterback Colin Kaepernick is on an “island in the locker room.”

    Coach Jim Tomsula said changes were coming on Friday, after the 49ers’ dreadful offensive performance in a 20-3 drubbing to rival Seattle. But he wouldn’t be specific. However, he did say there would be no change at quarterback. In fact, last week, Tomsula was obstinate about who makes the decision at quarterback – he does.

    But sticking with Kaepernick might not be what the organization wants. They have a $16 million bill coming due on him in the off-season, and if Kaepernick’s frustrating inconsistency persists, the higher-ups might want to see what kind of bridge quarterback Blaine Gabbert can be.

    Certainly, wide receivers Anquan Boldin and Torrey Smith exhibited consternation this season after a few of Kaepernick’s wayward passes. Nevertheless, to Kaepernick’s credit, he has not show any anger at his offensive line for their leaky protection.

    Of course, Kaepernick’s lack of pocket presence and inability to spot open receivers has contributed to his 25 sacks, something that is probably not lost on management.

    All of this puts pressure on Tomsula if indeed, those above him want him to make a change that he doesn’t want to make. Tomsula continues to be admired and well-liked by players. It seems that most believe that Tomsula is in the same predicament they’re in, namely working for a diminished team resulting from free-agent losses, sudden retirements and a lack of adequate replacements.

    But now, Tomsula’s loyalty and belief in his unshakable will to make things right might be working against him. Tomsula’s rise to success was built on persistence and overcoming insurmountable odds. How else could a guy that once slept in his car win the head job after just eight seasons as a defensive line coach?

    The reality is the 49ers cannot be fixed this year. Now they have lost strong safety Antoine Bethea, and running back Carlos Hyde has a stress fracture in his foot. Those losses are added to an already talent-challenged team.

    Tomsula announced he will fix his team and he is probably working himself into the ground to find solutions. But sleeping in his office, and hoping the answer will come in his 19th straight hour of toil is just magical thinking.

    The one decision Tomsula seems unwilling to make – the one at quarterback – is something that seems antithetical to Tomsula’s sense of loyalty and his belief he can work his way to winning.

    But it’s a decision that eventually, he may have to make.

    Twitter: @klynch49

    in reply to: official Browns game response thread #33117
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I watched the Brown game on replay, and i dont have
    anything new to add to what everyone’s already said.

    Janoris looks like a new player this year. He not
    only is covering consistently, he’s become an
    excellent tackler which i never expected.

    The redzone defense is something that reminds
    me of the old Patriots defense from the early
    superbowl years. The Rams are still giving up big plays
    but not TD’s and they tighten up in the redzone.
    Thats a significant and welcome change.

    The passing game is so atrocious I cant
    bear to even think of a third and long.

    Barron, and Hayes and Simms and Westbrooks
    and TJ and McLeod were all fun to watch in that
    game. And some guy named Gurley was pretty good.

    Playing with the lead is so much different.
    If Foles had had to play catch up I think
    we’d have seen four more INTs. At this point,
    with the OLine being a mess, Foles cannot
    be asked to stay in the pocket and sling
    the ball around.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Prediction Thread – The Francisco 49ers #33065
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams are at home.
    49ers have lost a ton of former-ram-killers on defense.
    Rams have Gurley.
    Cook is due to have a game where he’s not a Weasel.

    Rams win Ugly

    Rams 23
    SF 17

    w
    v

    in reply to: Projected Probowlers #33064
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I get the impression Barron is playing
    as well as anyone.

    He may be better than Ogletree
    in certain ways.

    w
    v

    in reply to: One step at a time #33004
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well the issue to ‘me’ is — can they get to that “ten win” level.
    Wild-card playoff level — and to be at ‘that’ level, you can
    still have weaknesses. So, i think they can indeed
    have a mediocre passing game and still be a wild-card-level team.

    I never had much hope for an ‘elite level’ team this year.

    I also do think the passing game will improve as the season
    goes along (barring injuries). Surely its reasonable to
    expect incremental improvement from a new QB and a new OLine
    as the season goes along and they get more experience.

    They get the 49ers at home. Good teams win
    these games. To state the obvious.

    PS — what could be finer than to beat
    the shit out of the 49ers and the Vikings
    in back to back weeks. Make it so.

    w
    v

    in reply to: official Browns game response thread #32984
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Haven’t seen it yet, but i watched the hi-lites.

    They did what they had to do — win ugly.

    Now they have to do it again next week — win ugly.

    Just win ugly, baby.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Miklasz: It’s Now or Never #32875
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I like the ending of Plan9
    better than 2001’s ending,
    btw.

    Not sure what has to do with Miklasz.

    Well, my own interpretation of what you just wrote
    is, “wv ram, you are even more brilliant
    than Hal, the computer on 2001.”

    w
    v

    in reply to: The brace comes off #32874
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I guess its all on Gurley today,
    seein-as-how Tavon has the hamstring-thingy.

    I think they might miss Tavon’s misdirection
    impact.

    If Foles throws a pick6 today,
    I am gonna become a
    Raiders fan.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Miklasz: It’s Now or Never #32870
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    They need to be intense, motivated,
    hit hard, play their asses off. And They need to win.

    You make sense, Miklasz doesn’t. I don’t think you translated him, I think you hit re-set and overwrote him.

    Cause, you know, 2001: A Space Odyssey is not Plan 9 From Outer Space, just cleaned up a bit.

    ================

    Well, honestly, that’s how my brain
    deals with people like Bernie,
    routinely.

    My brain goes “well, this is what he probly meant.”

    And I like the ending of Plan9
    better than 2001’s ending,
    btw.

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 9,811 through 9,840 (of 12,323 total)