Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipant
wvParticipantlogically, I know you are right.
Logic is not on the forefront of my brain at the moment.
I hear ya.
w
v
wvParticipant…I can’t speak.
I’m not sure at which point I fell in love with this team. I wish I hadn’t.
Well, lemme just ask…
How many games did you actually attend though Herzog?
Wasn’t your fan-experience basically
TV, Internet, Message-Boards ?You still have that, just like zn, and
Nittany and PaRam, and Snowman, etc, etc.Agree with you totally on the Kronky thing,
though. Yup. He screwed lotsa fans. Same as Georgia.
That aint the “Rams” though — thats Kronky.
And Georgia.w
v
wvParticipantI liked it, but…damn. It’s the same story.
Yeah. Exactly. Same story,
but i kinda liked it.Friend of mine said he was disappointed
that there weren’t more “Aliens.”
I think i agree. I would have liked to see
some more creativity.w
v
wvParticipantI would ‘think’ (just guessing) that the move
will be good for the Rams ‘psychologically’.
I mean they have this decade-long streak
of losing and mediocrity.What better way to begin a New chapter
than by…beginning a new chapter. Ya know.
New look, new location, new culture, new vibe.
Just seems like if i were a coach,
I’d say the move was a ‘positive’ thing.Otoh, the ole Rams were often criticized
for not being able to go east and play
in the cold weather. The thought
was that they got a little ‘soft’
in Hollywood. California never seemed
to hurt the 49ers though. So…we’ll see.w
vJanuary 13, 2016 at 12:56 pm in reply to: reporters on the Rams to LA vote (1/12-1/13 so far) #37160
wvParticipantNatural grass though.
I;ve seen it argued that the Rams as they are now built are not as good on grass.
The defense for one is slower.
However, maybe the long national nightmare of endless OL injuries will go away.
I wonder how Gurley will like playing
in the Rain, and such.Wonder what the Rams record is
over the last four years,
on grass?w
vJanuary 13, 2016 at 12:43 pm in reply to: reporters on the Rams to LA vote (1/12-1/13 so far) #37156
wvParticipantAs far as NFL alignment goes, the Rams’ move makes make great geographical sense. The NFC West will now presumable be comprised of Seattle, San Francisco, Arizona and the Los Angeles Rams, a perfect top-to-bottom West Coast (and slightly inland) group. If the Chargers move, the AFC West would consist of Oakland (for now), Denver, Kansas City and the Los Angeles Chargers. The franchises, they are a-changin’.
—————————-“Los Angeles Chargers” — for some reason, I hadn’t
thought about the fact the Chargers would not be
called the San Diego Chargers anymore.LA Rams and LA Chargers.
How weird.
So for two or three years it will be
the old Coliseum ?
Not a great home-field advantage.
The sound wont be intimidating.
Natural grass though.w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 3 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantWell, I agree totally: fuck the Corporate-nfl.
Fuck the Billionaire-club.But i hope Michael rejoins the
conversation again. He would
be missed.w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 3 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantThe real pertinent issue, for me, is all the St. Louis fans we will lose in the process. So I won’t be sitting there in the chat room feeling warm and glowy because they are in LA. Instead, I will be noticing and lamenting the missing members of our own community. Those guys mean far more to me than sunny home games in winter.
—————————
Sure. True. But to state the obvious,
the St.Louis fans are perfectly welcome on
the Nomad-Train, with so many of us,
Non-locals.Nomad life is good. No parking hassles.
No need to pay Kronky’s ticket-prices.
No need to sit behind a guy with a
giant watermelon on his head,
reading Shakespeare.(probably zooey)Also, I am not sure the LA thing will be
bad for the team. They went to a Super Bowl
in 79 and had plenty of near-misses in LA.
So they can do fine, even with all the
surrounding fan-distractions.Anywayz….strange times. kinda surreal.
Kronky fires St.Louis instead of Fisher.
It’ll take some time to process all this.w
v
wvParticipantMy own personal feeling? …I grew up
watching the old blue-and-white Rams in LA.
The team in St.Louis wore red. And i liked the Cardinals
but they weren’t the Rams.When i see the old Blue and White uniforms
i get the same feeling as when i open an old box
of Christmas cards that my mom has saved. Its like that.
Warm feelings. Childhood memories. Thats how i feel
when i see the blue and whites.So, I’m glad they are returning to Los Angeles;
I KNOW now, finally, they will wear the blue and whites
from time to time. I really thought i’d never see that again.I have so many warm and poignant memories — Jack Snow, Les Josephson,
Deacon/Merlin (thats one word btw :),
Youngbloods, George Allen, Cullen Bryant, Alvin Hammond, Bob Brown,
McCutcheon, Slater, Diron Talbot, Coy Bacon, Billy Waddy, Ferragamo’s pass, Prothro, Knox, Harold Jackson, The Vikings, Joe Kapp, The Cowboys, Staubach, The 49ers, Brodie…the St.Louis thing, just never ever felt quite right to me. Deep down it always felt a bit off….…I know some of the St.Louis fans will stop following the team
and to state the obvious, thats fine. Everyone feels
‘connections’ to different things — some folks feel connected
to the city, some to the players, some to a coach, some to
the uniforms, etc. There’s no right or wrong to any of that,
obviously.As for me…my own totally-subjective-irrational-feeling is…
…the Rams belong in blue and whites, in Los Angeles.
…and the red and white Cardinals belong in St.Louis.
Or maybe the Stallions belong in St.Louis. Something
belongs in St.Louis.Georgia was a dick. Kronky is a dick. The NFL is a
soul-less-corporation. The ‘game’
and the conversation with the posters, about the game,
is still fun for me.Back to Los Angeles. I like it. I’ll still be living out
the questions and throw’in things at the tv
in West, by god, Virginia 🙂w
v
Someone posted this on youtube :
wvParticipantSomewhere,
Grits is smiling.w
v
wvParticipantSD moving to LA is like the Rams moving to Columbia
yeah. not exactly like moving half way across the continent.
See he totally lost me with that.
I thought he meant Columbia the nation,
and… i was mulling that over.w
v
wvParticipantBtw, so much of this anger in St.Louis
is exactly what the fans in LA went
through back in the 90’s. I mean
you can go back and read the letters
and articles from the LA times, etc.http://articles.latimes.com/1994-05-04/news/mn-53698_1_rams-move
w
v
wvParticipantThe most despicable part of this was SK’s scorching of STL on the way out. He was “a Missouri guy” dedicated to finding a way to stay in STL … until there was a chance to build a stadium in L.A. He’s poisoned the well here, and now all the owners know it would be a horrible situation in STL if he stays put with the Rams. The lack of fan support is a self-fulfilled prophecy. He’s such an asshole, though, that Spanos won’t play ball with him. It will take an extraordinary amount of carrot-and-stick diplomacy to get another owner to go in with SK on a deal. The guy has absolutely no ethics. He wants what he wants when he wants it.
I actually do think that the Raiders to St. Louis is a potential solution. There is just no way that Oakland’s using public funds, and the Raiders have been trying to get a new stadium for decades. I would say that, somehow, the Raiders could make use of the STL stadium plan.
======================
Well, I don’t think he’s any more of an asshole than Georgia
was. Or Rosenbloom. Or most of them ‘Owners.’Georgia was a hero to a lot of St.Louis folk. Why?
Cause she screwed over the LA fans.Kroenke is an asshole to a lot of St.Louis folk.
Cause he wants to move the team, just
like Georgia did — for more money.I just think identifying with an ‘owner‘
is probly, maybe, not a good idea for fans.I guess my point is — if Kroenke is an asshole,
so was Georgia. But i didnt hear St.Louis
fans saying “Georgia is an asshole for moving
the team away from LA, to St.Louis”Ya know.
Owners are billionaire Cthulhus.
w
vJanuary 12, 2016 at 8:55 am in reply to: Peter King reviews the last playoff games and previews the next set #37017
wvParticipantHis foot struck the ball underneath the laces anyway.
He shanked it.
And then later, he and the Vikings
announcers cried.Dont forget the crying
part.w
v
wvParticipantThey ain’t winning the NFC this year.
Somethin aint quite right with them this year.The Vikes were mediocre and they barely escaped.
w
v
wvParticipantWentz sounds good to me. I doubt
he’s around at 15.w
v
wvParticipantI don’t think he’s that special. I think he gets points for how he used Barron after Ogletree went down. The run D struggled at times even with a great D line. I think maybe he gets a B grade.
Is it a ‘great line’ though, without Quinn?
Brockers aint great. Simms? Hayes? Fairley?
Solid players?
I dunno if its really a ‘great line’
without Q.w
v
wvParticipant
wvParticipantWord on Green Bay is that they not only miss Nelson, their OL has been very banged up. When guys are not out, they’re playing with injuries, and it looks out of sync. It’s like the 2014 Rams in that regard.
Washington, on the other hand, relies on its OL as a team strength, and their line is pretty healthy.
It’s the old story, and it’s why Cousins looks good and Rodgers doesn’t.
Well if it stays close, my money
is still on Rogers.Point taken though. Earlier
in the year folks were arguing
that A.Rogers THE greatest QB of ALL TIME.
Not so much this last month.w
v
wvParticipantBaylor QB: “Honestly, I wish I’d done a little bit more as far as being proactive to get into a pro style [offense],” he said, singling out the need to decipher fronts or coverages. “It was things I have never seen before.”
——————-I remember reading how Russell Wilson specifically looked
for a college that ran a PRO offense. He wanted to be ready
for the pro-game.It really surprises me that more QBs dont show the
foresight that RW showed.w
v
wvParticipantI see that the Vikings handed back an unwanted win to Seattle.
It all comes down to making plays. Or, making them when you need them.
I am the one who came up with that cliche btw…so you heard it here first.

I was disappointed those two teams
didnt go into 47 overtimes with
both collapsing of physical exhaustion
and spiritual and existential ennui,
each player, giving up football
forever.The Vikings have never been known
for winning the big game have they.w
v
wvParticipantLots of great OLinemen.
I;ve said this before but it bears repeating.
There is at least one Ram lineman in the pro bowl every single season from 1967 until 1990. That’s 24 consecutive years and 12 different players. In fact the 68 line had 4 pro bowlers, as did the 78 line and the 85 line.
I wonder if the Rams next pro-bowl OLineman
is on the team now? Hav seems like a solid
guy but not probowl material.w
v
wvParticipantWell I’m only gonna include QB’s I’ve
actually watched. So that starts in 68,
and leaves off the two greats from the 50s :Tier 1 Kurt
Tier 2 Roman
Tier 3
T.Green, Everett, James Harris,
Jaworski, Ferragamo.Bradford dont make the top three
tiers. Or Haden.Roman’s is difficult to judge because,
he really didn’t have great WRs
or great RBs, like Kurt did. He might
belong in Tier 1…or Tier3. Hard to say.If you start in the late 60’s like i did,
the Rams just dont have a Great, storied history
of QB play. You have Kurt…and then a bunch
of mediocre qbs, and some pretty good ones. But
it aint like Joe Montana, Steve Young, John Brodie…RB’s and Defensive Players looks better.
Probably the best group is the OLinemen.
Lots of great OLinemen.w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 3 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantIntent, that is subjective, right? Don’t make me write a passive construction.
Well ‘intent’ is a concept full of nuances.
There’s “heat of passion” intent where you hit
the gardener in the head with a lamp. (discovering your
spouse in bed with the gardener)
And then there’s the kind of deliberate intent
where you slowly poison the gardener over
a period of months.I know Burfect ‘intended’ to hit the WR,
but i think it was one of the split-second
‘micro-intent’ things. Its tough to coach that
out of DBs. The league is trying though.
But there’s always gonna be hits like that
from time to time — that one was really
bad, but so was the the hit by McCleod,
i think it was, on the sideline last year.
He almost kilt the guy.I just dont know that I’d call the McCleod
hit much different from the Burfect hit.
McCleod didnt hit the guy in the head,
but it was still a dangerous hit on a
defenseless player. I dunno. Tricky stuff.My sister’s family lives in Cincy. They
blame everything on Marvin Lewis.w
v
wvParticipantI dunno. I dont think it was
much different than the hit by
the Ram DB on the Viking QB.
I think its a penalty for sure
but I suspect its one of those split-second
micro ‘decisions’ thats not really a decision,
exactly. Just instinct. Competitive instinct.Still its a penalty for sure. Coulda
killed the guy.That one will be shown in meetings for
decades. What not to do.w
v
wvParticipantWell the Burfict hit was just
one of those bang-bang plays. They happen,
when yer flyin around out there.I disagree about the Burfict hit. He was head-hunting.
Well what makes you think that?
w
v
wvParticipantWell, lotsa folks seem to think he’s
a great offensivie Mind.
We’ll see if he’s a leader of men.w
v
wvParticipantWell the Burfict hit was just
one of those bang-bang plays. They happen,
when yer flyin around out there.The stupid play was simply
the Fumble. You cant fumble
in that situation. Ever.
That was the Stupid play of the Year.Aside from stupid fumbles though,
i think it was stupid of the Bengals
to play without their No.1 QB.
Its stupid to play a playoff game with
a no.2 QB.I believe I read somewhere this is the 6th
team in a ROW the Steelers have played
that was starting a backup QB.
Sooner or later they are gonna come
up against a guy like Brady.w
vJanuary 8, 2016 at 5:15 pm in reply to: Kroenke Building Stadium No Matter What (relocation thread) #36854
wvParticipantFascinating. Its like a mini-series.
Like Shogun or somethin.w
v -
This reply was modified 10 years, 3 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts


