Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 2,371 through 2,400 (of 8,012 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: political tweets #137957
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Seeing the name Jack Posobiec was enough for me to know it was a bogus ploy. He’s a well-known alt-right lunatic, and a truly despicable con man.

    That name looks familiar. I think that is the guy who posted the picture and drew attention to the jacket. Somebody in my timeline retweeted it. I never heard of this guy before, but I clicked on the tweet to save the photo. My first thought was “photoshop,” too, but in looking at it, I thought it DIDN’T looked photoshopped. I just posted the picture, though, then went back and read the responses, so I jumped the gun on that. I coulda saved some time reading the responses first, but as I said, I didn’t think it was photoshopped. It was other people in the responses who posted the full video, and someone else posted the article about Edmonton firefighters visiting in 2017.

    in reply to: political tweets #137954
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    However…

    There is this:

    Edmonton firefighters return from Ukraine after delivering much-needed aid: ‘It was very rewarding’

    Perhaps they left behind some gear?

    So it looks like the photo is real.

    And the video is real.

    And there was really somebody there with an Edmonton firefighting suit.

    in reply to: political tweets #137953
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    in reply to: political tweets #137951
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think the media has now fully come to terms with the fact that they are the propaganda department. Media used to see itself as independent investigators, reporting the Truth. From time-to-time, they collaborated with Power to shape an “important” narrative, but still saw themselves as basically independent. That has eroded over time so much that I think now that no longer lie to themselves about that. They know their function is to spin stories, and it’s openly accepted. They don’t fool themselves into thinking they report objective reality. They weave it, and they know that’s what they do.

     

    For example.

    Take a look at the back of the firefighter’s jacket.

     

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 3/22 – 3/30 #137938
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: political tweets #137937
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: rumors about Rams & Bobby Wagner #137917
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Joe Greene, Jack Ham, Jack Lambert, Donnie Shell, Mel Blount…

    I’m just curious.

    If your favorite player signs with the Rams, will that completely crush your neon green and blue heart?

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    FWIW, CBSsports has Allen Robinson as #1 on its list of best FA signings so far. The author is very high on Robinson, and think he is worth a top 5 WR contract, and he signed for much less.

    in reply to: rumors about Rams & Bobby Wagner #137900
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Rochell may well be the answer. He, like Jones, showed promise, though we saw more of Jones and I think can be more confident in his future than in Rochell’s.

    But…let’s say Rochell and Jones both emerge as solid players next year.

    They still need an Edge.

    in reply to: political tweets #137898
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: rumors about Rams & Bobby Wagner #137897
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    We do need help at Inside LB. We struggled against the run, especially up the middle. Wagner may be able to help with that. I still would consider signing Solomon Thomas to a one year cheap deal, to see if we can revive his career. As you know, players do look good behind Aaron Donald.

    I think you’re right about that. I do think that it is reasonable to expect significantly more from Jones next season, though, and there is probably a guy who, paired with Jones, could help the Rams shore up the run defense for far less than what Wagner would cost.

    You know, I think adding a stud is always a good thing, so I will be happy if they do sign Wagner.

    But…if halfway through the season, teams are eating up the CB opposite Ramsey, and the Rams aren’t getting the pressure on the QB like they did the last part of this season…well…Ima be pissed.

    I’d love to have Wagner, but I’d rather have Gilmore and/or Clowney.

    But…I dunno. Maybe having Wagner in there to take away the run game is as useful overall as having an edge in there to give the Rams the overwhelming pass rush advantage.

    I don’t know.

     

    in reply to: rumors about Rams & Bobby Wagner #137887
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think the Rams have bigger needs at CB and Edge, but I won’t complain if they sign this guy. Good players are good to have, I’ve always believed.

    in reply to: robert woods traded #137876
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Tyreek Hill is now a Dolphin #137867
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So that’s about the same as what the Rams got for Robert Woods, except for the 1st, the 2nd, and two 4ths.

    in reply to: Just a thread for different kindsa interesting things #137860
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: rumors about Rams & Bobby Wagner #137850
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, that would be like getting Hacksaw Reynolds back.

    It’s about time that balanced out.

    Take a quality LB from a division rival.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 3/22 – 3/30 #137849
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    when they added Miller to Donald and Floyd and what that did for Donald to personally reach an extra level.

    \

    I think this is an important point. There is a lot of talk about how Donald makes everybody else better – Fowler, Lloyd, Gaines, Miller – but it’s not pointed out as often how much better Miller made Donald.

    Miller created the tipping point in the front 7. His play also loosened up what Donald faced.

    And I mean…that synergy affected the Bengals’ game plan. They abandoned the 7-step drop (which is the strength of their offense) before the game even started. They knew they couldn’t do it.

    Donald’s devastating run through the playoffs was certainly about how great AD is. But it’s also a credit to Miller. And the Rams are wise to try to find a guy for that role.

    Side note: personally, I’m not convinced Wagner is that guy. I lack the imagination to see how Wagner might help. He’s a great player, and he would probably contribute in some way, but I don’t know if he would create the overload in the pass rush that Miller did. I wonder if Clowney might be a better fit. I hasten to add that I have no knowledge of Clowney or Wagner outside of their reputations. I’ve seen Wagner play a few times, and Clowney once or twice, maybe, but I don’t know anything about them, not really. But I saw what another quality Edge rusher did for the Rams, so that’s what I’m hoping for.

    in reply to: RIP John Clayton #137845
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I liked Madden cause he was… Madden, but I liked Clayton cause he was Clayton. w v

    Neither one would have netted more than a 6th.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So…not similar to Van Jefferson, then?

     

     

    in reply to: robert woods traded #137833
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Looking at the compensation for the Wentz and Ryan trades — two 3rds, and one 3rd, respectively — it makes the 6th rounder for Woods all the more absurd. Wentz is basically a bust. Ryan is the better player, but he’s 37. Woods deserves at least similar returns. Worst case scenario: a 4th this year. At worst. If we’re comparing his overall game, and his intangibles, to Davante Adams . . . I’m thinking the Rams should have gotten at least a 2nd. Woods is actually a 1st round receiver, and proven many times over. But, yeah, the age and injury thing kick in too. So I get that.

    I was thinking a along those lines. I mean…a 6th round pick has, like, 50/50 chance of being with the team for  Year 3. Probably less than that. And that would be spot duty and special teams, maybe. Woods will still be starting and contributing 3 years from now, without a doubt. And he’s a known quantity. He’s GOOD.

    But…there are a lot of good WRs. Only a few teams have nobody. Most teams have serviceable WRs, or even really, really good WRs.

    QBs just aren’t a good comparison. Wentz may be a “bust,” but he’s a still better than other starting QBs in this league. That’s the reality.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #137809
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    TMW2022-03-23color.png

    in reply to: Rams Tweets 3/17 – 3/21 #137808
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams’ roster-building model #137803
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    This is the thing. This right here.

    Yep.

    We are looking at the most effective front office in Rams history.

    in reply to: political tweets #137784
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The media seems to have morphed from pipeline of BS to generator of BS. The media itself is doctoring photos and videos, and so on.

    According to the press accounts I have seen about this issue, that’s not true.

    I think I have a better way of expressing this now.

    I think the media has now fully come to terms with the fact that they are the propaganda department.

    Media used to see itself as independent investigators, reporting the Truth. From time-to-time, they collaborated with Power to shape an “important” narrative, but still saw themselves as basically independent.

    That has eroded over time so much that I think now that no longer lie to themselves about that. They know their function is to spin stories, and it’s openly accepted. They don’t fool themselves into thinking they report objective reality. They weave it, and they know that’s what they do.

    in reply to: robert woods traded #137782
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    amari cooper netted a fifth and a move up the sixth round this year.

    I did not know that. I saw he was traded, but did not notice the details.

    That does change my thinking on it. That’s kind of mind-blowing to me. There are a lot of good WR, but…wow.

    in reply to: robert woods traded #137781
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It was neither. It was because they gave Woods the final say in choosing which team he wanted to be traded to. He chose the team he wanted most, and the Rams, out of respect to him, just accepted the Titan’s low bid. They weren’t out for the highest bidder, they were honoring Woods’s choice of teams, out of deference to what he meant to the Rams and how he conducted himself as a player and leader.

    I believe the Rams wanted to “do right” by Woods.

    But I’d sure like to know how these negotiations went. Did the Rams contact TN? What did the Eagles, Browns, and Bears offer? I can’t wrap my head around a 6th rounder.

    I have often wondered about the Rams getting poor return value on players they part with, but I’ve always thought that there is a possibility that I overvalue Rams players. But this is nonsense. A 6th rounder is probably out of the league before Woods retires. Woods is not just a proven starter, he is very, very good. It just seems like terrible poker playing on the part of the Rams.

    Robinson better be very, very good.

    Because they didn’t have to sign him. This whole roster change comes out of the oven as Robinson + 6th round pick in exchange for Woods.

    Now…why would you do that?

    It must be scheme. We know that Woods was down in production this year, and was actually unhappy after the first month of the season. Maybe the Rams decided that Woods wasn’t a real good match with Stafford’s style of play, and Robinson is a better fit. Let’s hope so.

    But…a sixth? Is that what TN thought Woods is worth? Did the Rams just lay al their cards on the table? Did they make no effort to leverage the other teams’ offers against TN to make them pay more?

    Anyway. So be it.

    in reply to: robert woods traded #137764
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I would have liked to be in on the conversations because there is no way, from my couch, that this trade makes sense.

    Well as was said in the thread, it’s a 6th rounder because the Rams let Woods choose the team he went to, and he chose the Titans…and that’s all they were offering.

    Okay, but sending Woods where he wants to go could be a consideration, but surely if another team offered something better – a 4th, say – business is business. They might give him the courtesy of 10-12 slots difference, but…a SIXTH?

    in reply to: robert woods traded #137762
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    For the Vikings fella, I woulda understood. A position of depth for a position of need. Would not have loved it, but would have understood.

    A 6th rounder?

    I would have liked to be in on the conversations because there is no way, from my couch, that this trade makes sense. I mean…if 5 teams were interested, how the F### is a 6th rounder not a laughable bid? Would you trade a 6th rounder to acquire Woods? In a nanosecond.

    Why do the Rams trade a 2nd and a 3rd for Miller for half a season, and get only a 6th for Robert Woods for 3 years, or whatever he has left?

    This just derails my brain.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I do not consent to a Robert Woods trade.

    They can deal Jefferson if they want, though I can’t see what that would accomplish. He’s cheap, and without much trade value.

    But I want the Rams to get an edge rusher the easy way. Maybe the NFL can rig it for the Rams to win two years in a row.

    in reply to: RIP John Clayton #137718
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    He seemed like a decent human being, and his insight was clear and professional.

Viewing 30 posts - 2,371 through 2,400 (of 8,012 total)