Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 17,761 through 17,790 (of 47,622 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Biden-anyone believe he can take office? #124308
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    the many obstacles to the “GOP state legislatures steal the election for Trump” scenario
    It’s easier said than done.

    https://www.vox.com/21562815/biden-trump-fraud-state-legislatures-electors

    With President Donald Trump and a good portion of the Republican Party unwilling to accept that Joe Biden has won the election, an idea has been tossed around on the right: What if they get Republican state legislatures in states Biden won to appoint Trump electors instead?

    To be clear, this would amount to an attempt to steal the election, defying the will of voters and ignoring the election results. But some Republicans are talking about it anyway (claiming the results can’t be trusted because of some fraud for which there is no evidence).

    Conservative radio host Mark Levin called for legislatures to act, tweeting: “GET READY TO DO YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY.” The president’s son Donald Trump Jr. retweeted Levin’s tweet. And the New York Times’s Maggie Haberman reported that President Trump himself discussed the possibility at a meeting with advisers Wednesday.

    Fox News reporter John Roberts mused on air Wednesday that “the anger out there in these red states is so deep and so palpable that GOP legislators may have a difficult team seating Biden electors.” (“That would be something,” his colleague Bill Hemmer said in response.)

    So far, not many Republican legislators in the relevant states have outright endorsed this plan, and the New York Times’ Trip Gabriel and Stephanie Saul reported Friday that several Republican legislative leaders in key states have said they don’t believe they can do so. But there are a few pushing for it. “Our state legislature must be prepared to use all constitutional authority to right the wrong,” Pennsylvania state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R) wrote on Facebook.

    Yet even if many more Republican legislators did begin to rally around this plan, there are a great many obstacles — practical, political, and legal — that make it quite unlikely to succeed.

    It would take several states to pull this off, and several key states have Democratic statewide officials

    To understand what’s going on here, you have to realize that the Electoral College will be made up of actual people — 538 people in total who will cast the votes that officially choose the next president of the United States. The way it’s supposed to work is that, if Biden wins a state, his chosen people become the electors for that state. But this idea from Trump supporters is essentially that GOP state legislatures in states Biden won should just pick Trump electors instead.

    Now, to start off with the electoral math: Biden leads in states that would give him 306 electoral votes. Of the states he won somewhat narrowly, five — Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Georgia, have Republican-controlled state legislatures.

    But successful shenanigans to flip one or even two of these five states to Trump would not be enough to change the outcome. To deprive Biden of 270 electoral votes, Trump would need to overturn the results in three of these five states. That already makes it less plausible that it would work.

    The next major problem is that all of these states except Georgia have Democratic statewide officials who obviously would not be willing to go along with a plot to steal their state’s electoral votes for Trump.

    Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania have Democratic governors and secretaries of state.
    Election results in Michigan and Wisconsin are certified by bipartisan boards.
    Arizona has a Democratic secretary of state (but a Republican governor)
    Even in Georgia, Republican secretary of state Brad Raffensperger has so far resisted pressure on the right and said he’s found no significant fraud with the results.
    So before even getting into the legal nitty-gritty, it’s clear that there would be significant resistance among statewide officials to any legislative plan to award electors in states Biden won to Trump.

    Current law does not favor the legislators

    Then there is the problem that it’s very far from clear whether state legislatures can legally even do this, especially after the election has concluded, and especially if they don’t use the ordinary legislative process requiring a governor’s signature. Indeed, some have asserted that it would be flat-out illegal for state legislatures to appoint Trump electors in states Biden won at this point.

    The legal situation here is complex, with the the US Constitution, federal law, and laws in the individual states all coming into play.

    For instance, the Electoral Count Act, as amended in 1948, says that the duty of actually certifying the electors in each state falls to state governors (not the legislature). So the Democratic governors in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania surely wouldn’t meekly accept GOP state legislatures’ plot to swap in their own electors. The governors would certify Biden electors, meaning there would conceivably be two sets of electors in each state.

    Meanwhile, Pennsylvania state law quite clearly says that electors are chosen in a popular vote in the state’s general election, as the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent writes. Wisconsin and Michigan state law also give no role to the legislature in choosing electors. Taking current law at face value, the legislatures really can’t appoint electors.

    Against all this, Republicans would try and claim that the power of the Constitution’s literal text should wipe out vast swaths of existing federal and state law. Specifically, they’d say that Article II, Section I says (emphasis added) “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.” They’d ask, doesn’t that mean the legislature really gets to do whatever it wants with electors? Not the governor or (in Wisconsin and Michigan’s case) bipartisan elections boards?

    This assertion of power would be particularly mind-boggling because, in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (at least) it would have to be done outside the ordinary state lawmaking process, to avoid a veto from the Democratic governor. Essentially, GOP legislators would have to claim that they can wipe out state laws purely through their own authority.

    This would fly in the face of long-existing Supreme Court precedent — in the 1932 Smiley v. Holm decision, the Court held that, no, the Constitution doesn’t let a legislature just ignore the governor’s veto on election matters.

    Of course, there’s a different Supreme Court now. Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh recently embraced the legal theory that, in Gorsuch’s words, “state legislatures — not federal judges, not state judges, not state governors, not other state officials — bear primary responsibility for setting election rules.”

    But it’s unclear if three other justices on the Court are with them. And boy, would it be a lot for the Court to throw out state and federal laws and Supreme Court precedent left and right to anoint Trump the winner of an election Biden clearly won. (Another problem, as Ohio State University law professor Edward B. Foley wrote in a law journal article last year, is that it could violate the due process clause of the Constitution to change election rules after the election has already happened.)

    Another wrinkle, though, is that it’s not even necessarily clear that the Supreme Court would be the decider here. The Constitution gives the role of counting the electoral votes to Congress — which in this case would mean the new Democratic-controlled House and a Republican-controlled Senate (because the Georgia runoffs wouldn’t yet be decided). It’s unclear how a serious dispute would be settled (Foley’s article has some ideas), but it’s worth noting that several Republican senators have already congratulated Biden or have recognized that he appears to have won.

    The backlash would be … quite something

    Finally, there’s another consideration: if Republican legislators actually tried to steal the election in this way, many people would get very, very upset, and the situation could get very, very ugly.

    In a piece disparaging what he called this “completely insane electoral college strategy,” National Review editor Rich Lowry used the word “thermonuclear” to describe the backlash that would ensue, and called it “a poisonous idea that stands out as radical and destructive, even in a year when we’ve been debating court-packing and defunding the police.”

    Where that “thermonuclear” rage would lead, we can only guess. But anyone concerned with the basic stability of the nation would have reason to think twice about going down this road.

    If enough GOP legislators are sufficiently ideologically radical and beholden to Trump, they could choose to give it a try anyway. But there are many obstacles in the way of this gambit’s success.

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/14 & 11/15 #124307
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Brett Kollmann@BrettKollmann
    Crazy stat of the day…

    If you took Peyton Manning’s historic 2013 season where he passed for 342 yards per game, which is the all-time single season record, that would STILL be way behind the pace of the **average** quarterback facing the 2020 @Seahawks (362 yards per game).

    TurfShowTimes@TurfShowTimes
    Seahawks will have limited experience at cornerback against Rams receivers; Linden Stephens (20 snaps), DJ Reed (debuted 2 weeks ago), Ryan Neal (been playing safety) could be starting for the NFL’s worst pass defense on Sunday

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/14 & 11/15 #124302
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/14 & 11/15 #124301
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: the new virus news & virus dark humor thread #124299
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Straight up. No holds barred. What’s your honest assessment regarding how we’ve faced or failed to face this existential threat? And how to do see our response impacting the rest of the world?

    Until something convinces me otherwise, I think three things. None of which are original. 😎

    1. That the main protocols such as masking, distancing, avoiding crowded poorly ventilated indoors places, testing–if done consistently by a large percentage of the population–works. I think all of that can keep the numbers down until the vaccine rides in (bugels blowing).

    2. We never really did any of that. Not in a committed, decisive, nationally unified way. That goes straight to leadership. Leaders at all levels could have led on this–blasted the message out, debunked the myths, honestly conveyed valid info, assured people the protocols work. That failure was catastrophic.

    3. At a completely different level, I believe the virus took an economic toll, but in a different way than that is usually said. (Not different from here, different from the mainstream.) That is, the viruas completely exposed the policy and economic deficiencies that haunt our system. I recently posted info that shows there are mental health issues not just with those who got stressed out by the lockdown, but also by at risk populations who are reacting to the virus itself–that is, a primary source of anxiety is the vulnerability of those who have a higher likelihood of either getting the virus or of getting sick from it. These include people who are listed as “essential workers” (I post that bit at the end below). There’s all that plus the fact that death rates depended upon whether your hospital was for a high-bracket or low-bracket income population, plus the fact that we don’t have public insurance, plus the fact that we have no basic workers protection like in Europe (so staying away from work does not mean starving), and so on and so on and so on.

    from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6932a1-H.pdf

    “The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with mental health challenges related to the morbidity and mortality caused by the disease and to mitigation activities, including the impact of physical distancing and stay-at-home orders.* Symptoms of anxiety disorder and depressive disorder increased considerably in the United States during April–June of 2020, compared with the same period in 2019 (1,2). To assess mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the pandemic, representative panel surveys were conducted among adults aged ≥18 years across the United States during June 24–30, 2020. Overall, 40.9% of respondents reported at least one adverse mental or behavioral health condition, including symptoms of anxiety disorder or depressive disorder (30.9%), symptoms of a trauma- and stressor-related disorder (TSRD) related to the pandemic† (26.3%), and having started or increased substance use to cope with stress or emotions related to COVID-19 (13.3%). The percentage of respondents who reported having seriously considered suicide in the 30 days before completing the survey (10.7%) was significantly higher among respondents aged 18–24 years (25.5%), minority racial/ethnic groups (Hispanic respondents [18.6%], non-Hispanic black [black] respondents [15.1%]), self-reported unpaid caregivers for adults§ (30.7%), and essential workers¶ (21.7%). Community-level intervention and prevention efforts, including health communication strategies, designed to reach these groups could help address various mental health conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

    in reply to: the new virus news & virus dark humor thread #124293
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from ‘No One Is Listening to Us’
    More people than ever are hospitalized with COVID-19. Health-care workers can’t go on like this.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/11/third-surge-breaking-healthcare-workers/617091/?fbclid=IwAR27_eCSc48uJXsmkaMydzbwbSLSHlRDZmAbvpUss-TEpfW4zpH8hL4yiIo

    Every time nurse Megan Ranney returns to the hospital, there are more COVID-19 patients.

    In the months since March, many Americans have habituated to the horrors of the pandemic. But health-care workers do not have the luxury of looking away: They’re facing a third pandemic surge that is bigger and broader than the previous two. In the U.S., states now report more people in the hospital with COVID-19 than at any other point this year—and 40 percent more than just two weeks ago.

    Emergency rooms are starting to fill again with COVID-19 patients. Utah, where Nathan Hatton is a pulmonary specialist at the University of Utah Hospital, is currently reporting 2,500 confirmed cases a day, roughly four times its summer peak. Hatton says that his intensive-care unit is housing twice as many patients as it normally does. His shifts usually last 12 to 24 hours, but can stretch to 36. “There are times I’ll come in in the morning, see patients, work that night, work all the next day, and then go home,” he told me. I asked him how many such shifts he has had to do. “Too many,” he said.

    Hospitals have put their pandemic plans into action, adding more beds and creating makeshift COVID-19 wards. But in the hardest-hit areas, there are simply not enough doctors, nurses, and other specialists to staff those beds. Some health-care workers told me that COVID-19 patients are the sickest people they’ve ever cared for: They require twice as much attention as a typical intensive-care-unit patient, for three times the normal length of stay. “It was doable over the summer, but now it’s just too much,” says Whitney Neville, a nurse based in Iowa. “Last Monday we had 25 patients waiting in the emergency department. They had been admitted but there was no one to take care of them.” I asked her how much slack the system has left. “There is none,” she said.

    The entire state of Iowa is now out of staffed beds, Eli Perencevich, an infectious-disease doctor at the University of Iowa, told me. Worse is coming. Iowa is accumulating more than 3,600 confirmed cases every day; relative to its population, that’s more than twice the rate Arizona experienced during its summer peak, “when their system was near collapse,” Perencevich said. With only lax policies in place, those cases will continue to rise. Hospitalizations lag behind cases by about two weeks; by Thanksgiving, today’s soaring cases will be overwhelming hospitals that already cannot cope. “The wave hasn’t even crashed down on us yet,” Perencevich said. “It keeps rising and rising, and we’re all running on fear. The health-care system in Iowa is going to collapse, no question.”

    In the imminent future, patients will start to die because there simply aren’t enough people to care for them. Doctors and nurses will burn out. The most precious resource the U.S. health-care system has in the struggle against COVID-19 isn’t some miracle drug. It’s the expertise of its health-care workers—and they are exhausted.

    The struggles of the first two COVID-19 surges in the United States helped hospitals steel themselves for the third. Hardened by the crucible of March and April, New York City built up its ability to spot burgeoning hot spots, trace contacts, and offer places where infected people can isolate. “We’re seeing red flags but we’ve prepared ourselves,” says Syra Madad from NYC Health + Hospitals. Experienced health-care workers are less fearful than they were earlier this year. “We’ve been through this before and we know what we have to do,” says Uché Blackstock, an emergency physician who works in Brooklyn. And with the new generation of rapid tests, Blackstock says she can now tell patients if they have the coronavirus within minutes—a huge improvement over the spring, when tests were scarce and slow.

    Smaller clinics, nursing homes, and long-term-care facilities are still struggling to provide personal protective equipment, including gloves and masks. “About a third are completely out of at least one type of PPE” despite having COVID-19 cases, says Esther Choo, a physician at Oregon Health and Science University and a founder of Get Us PPE. But larger hospitals are doing better, having built up stockpiles and backup plans in case supply chains become strained again. “The hospital is probably the safest place to work in Iowa, because we actually have PPE,” Perencevich said.

    Most important, COVID-19 is no longer a total mystery. Health-care workers now have a clearer idea of what the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is capable of. Protocols that didn’t exist in the spring have become habit. “It used to be that to do a single thing, people would start email chains and you’d be 100 emails in before we knew the answer,” Choo says. “Now we’re moving faster. It feels a lot more confident.”

    There are still no cures, and the best drug on offer—the steroid dexamethasone—reduces the odds of dying from COVID-19 by at most 12 percent. But doctors know how to triage patients, which tests to order, and which treatments to use. They know that ventilators can sometimes hurt patients, and that “proning”—flipping patients onto their stomach—can help. They know about the blood clots and kidney problems. They know that hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work. This cumulative knowledge means that death rates from COVID-19 are much lower now than they were in the spring. Flattening the curve worked as intended, giving health-care workers some breathing room to learn how to handle a disease that didn’t even exist this time last year.

    But these hard-earned successes are brittle. If death rates have fallen thanks to increasing medical savvy, they might rise again as nurses and doctors burn out. “If we can get patients into staffed beds, I feel like they’re doing better,” Perencevich said. “But that requires a functional health-care system, and we’re at the point where we aren’t going to have that.”

    Intensive-care units are called that for a reason. A typical patient with a severe case of COVID-19 will have a tube connecting their airways to a ventilator, which must be monitored by a respiratory therapist. If their kidneys shut down, they might be on 24-hour dialysis. Every day, they’ll need to be flipped onto their stomach, and then onto their back again—a process that requires six or seven people. They’ll have several tubes going into their heart and blood vessels, administering eight to 12 drugs—sedatives, pain medications, blood thinners, antibiotics, and more. All of these must be carefully adjusted, sometimes minute to minute, by an ICU nurse. None of these drugs is for treating COVID-19 itself. “That’s just to keep them alive,” Neville, the Iowa nurse, said. An ICU nurse can typically care for two people at a time, but a single COVID-19 patient can consume their full attention. Those patients remain in the ICU for three times the length of the usual stay.

    Nurses and doctors are also falling sick themselves. “The winter is traditionally a very stressful time in health care, and everyone gets taken down at some point,” says Saskia Popescu, an infection preventionist at George Mason University, who is based in Arizona. The third COVID-19 surge has intensified this seasonal cycle, as health-care workers catch the virus, often from outside the hospital. “Our unplanned time off is double what it was last October,” says Allison Suttle of Sanford Health, a health system operating in South Dakota, North Dakota, and Minnesota. Many hospitals have staff on triple backup: While off their shifts, they should expect to get called in if a colleague and their first substitute and the substitute’s substitute are all sick. At least 1,375 U.S. health-care workers have died from COVID-19.

    The first two surges were concentrated in specific parts of the country, so beleaguered hospitals could call for help from states that weren’t besieged. “People were coming to us in our hour of need,” says Madad, from NYC Health + Hospitals, “but now the entire nation is on fire.” No one has reinforcements to send. There are travel nurses who aren’t tied to specific health systems, but the hardest-hit rural hospitals are struggling to attract them away from wealthier, urban centers. “Everyone is tapping into the same pool, and people don’t want to work in Fargo, North Dakota, for the holidays,” Suttle says. North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum recently said that nurses who are positive for COVID-19 but symptom-free can return to work in COVID-19 units. “That’s just a big red flag of just how serious it is,” Suttle says. (The North Dakota Nurses Association has rejected the policy.)

    Short-staffed hospitals could transfer their patients—but to where? “A lot of smaller hospitals don’t have ventilators or staff trained to take care of someone in critical condition,” says Renae Moch, the director of Bismarck-Burleigh Public Health, North Dakota. “They’re looking to larger hospitals,” but those are also full.

    Making matters worse, patients with other medical problems are sicker than usual, several doctors told me. During the earlier surges, hospitals canceled elective surgeries and pulled in doctors from outpatient clinics. People with heart problems, cancers, strokes, and other diseases found it harder to get medical help, and some sat on their illness for fear of contracting COVID-19 at the hospital. Now health-care workers are facing an influx of unusually sick people at a time when COVID-19 has consumed their attention and their facilities. “We’re still catching up on all of that,” says Choo, the Oregon physician. “Even the simplest patients aren’t simple.”

    For many health-care workers, the toll of the pandemic goes beyond physical exhaustion. COVID-19 has eaten away at the emotional core of their work. “To be a nurse, you really have to care about people,” Neville said. But when an ICU is packed with COVID-19 patients, most of whom are likely to die, “to protect yourself, you just shut down. You get to the point when you realize that you’ve become a machine. There’s only so many bags you can zip.”

    As the pandemic moved out of big coastal cities and into rural communities, health-care workers were more likely to treat people they knew personally—relatives, hospital colleagues, the bus driver who drove their kids to school. And across the country, doctors and nurses have struggled with the same anxieties as everyone else—loneliness, extra child-care burdens, the stress of a tumultuous year, fear. “The lines between our personal lives and our careers have completely gone,” says Laolu Fayanju, senior medical director in Ohio of Oak Street Health, a national network of primary-care centers. “We’re often thinking about how we protect ourselves, our families, and our neighborhoods” from the pandemic.

    After SARS hit Toronto in 2003, health-care workers at hospitals that treated SARS patients showed higher levels of burnout and posttraumatic stress up to two years later, compared with those at hospitals in nearby cities that didn’t see the disease. That outbreak lasted just four months. The COVID-19 pandemic is now in its tenth month. “I’ve had conversations with people who’ve been nurses for 25 years, and all of them say the same thing: ‘We’ve never worked in this environment before,’” says Jennifer Gil from Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia, who contracted COVID-19 herself in March. “How much can meditation or mental-health resources help when we’re doing this every day?”

    Even after cases stop climbing, health-care workers will have to catch up on a new round of procedures that didn’t happen because of COVID-19—but without the adrenaline that a packed hospital brings. “Everyone talks about fatigue during the surge, but one of the hardest things is coming down from it,” Popescu says. “You’re exhausted but you still don’t get that mental break.”

    As hard as the work fatigue is, the “societal fatigue” is harder, said Hatton, the Utah pulmonary specialist. He is tired of walking out of an ICU where COVID-19 has killed another patient, and walking into a grocery store where he hears people saying it doesn’t exist. Health-care workers and public-health officials have received threats and abusive messages accusing them of fearmongering. They’ve watched as friends have adopted Donald Trump’s lies about doctors juking the hospitalization numbers to get more money. They’ve pleaded with family members to wear masks and physically distance, lest they end up competing for ICU beds that no longer exist. “Nurses have been the most trusted profession for 18 years in a row, which is now bullshit because no one is listening to us,” Neville said.

    Choo also studies the impacts of health-care policy, and has found that health-care systems sometimes react to imminent policies months before they are actually come into force.

    Still, “you can’t just fix a pandemic this far down the rabbit hole,” Popescu says. “I’m hopeful, but I don’t expect this to suddenly turn itself around overnight.”

    “We can’t just sit on our hands and wait for Jan. 20 to come,” said Megan Ranney, the Rhode Island physician. Several health-care workers I spoke with are trying to keep mild cases of COVID-19 from becoming severe enough to warrant an ICU bed. The Oak Street Health primary-care centers deliver fluids, pulse oximeters, and smart tablets to the homes of newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients, so doctors can check on their symptoms virtually. In North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota, the Sanford Health network has set up outpatient “infusion centers” where elderly COVID-19 patients or those with chronic illnesses can get drugs that might slow the progression of their disease. These drugs will include the antibody therapy bamlanivimab, which received an emergency-use authorization from the FDA on Monday, Suttle told me.

    But the best strategy remains the obvious one: Keep people from getting infected at all. Once again, the fate of the U.S. health-care system depends on the collective action of its citizens. Once again, the nation must flatten the curve. This need not involve a lockdown. We now know that the coronavirus mostly spreads through the air, and does so easily when people spend prolonged periods together in poorly ventilated areas. People can reduce their risk by wearing masks and avoiding indoor spaces such as restaurants, bars, and gyms, where the possibility of transmission is especially high (no matter how often these places clean their surfaces). Thanksgiving and Christmas gatherings, for which several generations will travel around the country for days of close indoor contact and constant conversation, will be risky too.

    Preliminary results suggest that at least one effective vaccine is on the way. The choices made in the coming weeks will influence how many Americans die before they have a chance to receive it, and how many health-care workers are broken in the process.

    in reply to: around the league … week 10 #124288
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Biden-anyone believe he can take office? #124287
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Kyle Griffin@kylegriffin1
    Just in the last 12 hours, the Trump campaign has lost 6 election-related lawsuits in Pennsylvania.

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124283
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
    Here’s something interesting: As Joe Noteboom has worked his way back healthy (he will be elevated this week), he has been taking some backup LT reps. I wonder whether team would like to sort of start fresh on a position switch there post-injury, and with Edwards playing well.

    Either way, it’s hard to switch back and forth so if they really believe they can invest in him, it’s time to find one spot and really get those reps in.

    On this point, McVay said Rams will continue to pick up swingman development for Noteboom and not necessarily just stick him at reserve LT/re-start his development there. Ultimately want a plug and play depth guy who can play on either side. So, moving away from full time LG.

    in reply to: the new virus news & virus dark humor thread #124282
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124281
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: the new virus news & virus dark humor thread #124278
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Adam Amin@adamamin
    I was going to type some emotional tweet about how I’m thankful to be back on NFL coverage this week and I am but most of you don’t care and that’s fine.

    I’m 33 and healthy and I got COVID and it sucked. It sucked feeling like a truck hit me and having no life in my body.

    It sucked going from my bed to my kitchen for water and feeling like I was going to pass out. It sucked feeling like I couldn’t breathe beyond 50% capacity for three days, fearing the same thing that Emmanuel Sanders, A PRO FOOTBALL PLAYER, feared.

    Save your “survival rate” and “infection rate” screenshots. I’ve seen them. They won’t matter to you if you, the individual, go to bed honestly wondering if your body will stop working overnight. I’m not sure how people can’t comprehend that. The whole experience sucked.

    And it sucked a lot less because I took in a lower viral load cause I wore a mask as diligently as I have while traveling. I don’t know when my lungs will decide to be 100% again but I’m going to work my ass off to get them as close to normal as possible

    In the meantime, have some empathy for your fellow human, in fact for millions who dealt with this and likely will continue to deal with this in some capacity, hopefully a small one, and wear the fucking masks and stop bitching about LITERALLY the least you are being asked to do.

    I usually say things nicely, so I apologize if this wasn’t nice.

    But I don’t want to feel the way my body felt like that again. And I don’t want you to have to feel that way either. So I say these things in hopes that maybe you’ll minimize the chance you or someone else gets it.

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124272
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PFF@PFF
    Top-5 Fantasy WRs through Wk 9:
    1. Tyreek Hill – 175.2 PPR points
    2. Davante Adams – 168.5
    3. D.K. Metcalf – 167.8
    4. Stefon Diggs – 162.3
    5. Tyler Lockett – 156.5

    Stu Jackson@StuJRams
    Rams HC Sean McVay said OLB Terrell Lewis (shoulder) and Leonard Floyd (knee) will be questionable for Sunday’s game vs. Seahawks, but are expected to play.

    S Jordan Fuller remains on track to be activated to 53-man roster and play.

    Jourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
    Jalen Ramsey said that DK Metcalf is an “undeniable talent” – but will he stick with him throughout Sunday’s game? “I’m sure I’ll guard him. I’m sure I’ll guard probably all of their receivers at some point in the game.”

    Jalen’s direct quote actually was, “I’m sure I’ll guard him. I’m sure I’ll guard probably all of their receivers at some point in the game.”

    Note: A CB can “shadow” a receiver while also having different assignments at certain points throughout a game. Headline seems misleading. https://twitter.com/Rotoworld_FB/status/1327336564003770368

    Lindsey Thiry@LindseyThiry
    Jalen Ramsey says WR DK Metcalf has taken a huge step from last year and calls him an “undeniable talent.”

    Rams Wire@TheRamsWire
    Rams run more max-protect plays than any team in the NFL

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124267
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124266
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124264
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
    Robinson will make his debut with his new team, head coach Sean McVay confirmed this week….Robinson does a lot of things, and does them well. He’ll be a great addition to the Rams’ run-stop efforts, considering his size and width, meaning he’ll be able to sit down in a couple of gaps and either help stuff a rusher or close his lanes and divert him. He also can acquire multiple blockers, which helps the Rams’ pass rush because one of their biggest goals each week is to free up Aaron Donald from the constant double-teams he faces. Robinson is really versatile, so he can play all three downs if needed. I still expect a rotation up front, but I don’t think he changes their actual scheme. He might make it a few percentage points better as he gets his feet under him.

    By the way, Rams fans, Robinson isn’t the only player the team will get back this week. Rookie safety Jordan Fuller, who was enjoying a bit of a breakout season before suffering a shoulder injury in mid-October, will return on Sunday. I can see the Rams using extra-defensive-back packages that also feature Rapp, who played really well in Fuller’s absence, to help counter the Seahawks’ prolific receiving corps.

    McVay, unprompted, has brought up the team’s need to tighten up its special-teams efforts a couple of times this week, and it’s not hard to imagine why….one guy I believe they miss in coverage is Burgess. Remember Hekker’s MVPunter performance against Chicago? Burgess, before suffering his season-ending ankle injury, was everywhere and made a few special-teams stops.

    I really believe the Rams have the pieces to beat Seattle, but as I wrote this week, it seems it will come down to game plan and execution on the offensive side. The Rams have a big opportunity to put the wheels back on that side of the ball this week, especially against a pretty dilapidated Seahawks secondary, but they need to take care of the ball and counter pressure better than they have so far this season. I think the Rams’ defense will show up as it has the last couple of weeks, but then there’s Wilson. So let’s also understand that some points inevitably will be put up on Sunday. Considering all of this, plus McVay’s 4-2 record against Carroll … I’m calling it for the Rams, 37-34.

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124263
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: dumb stuff #124261
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: press & others (including McV) set up the Seattle game #124260
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Around The NFL@AroundTheNFL
    @greggrosenthal’s Week 10 game picks: Rams top Seahawks; Vikings over Bears

    https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-week-10-game-picks-colts-nip-titans-rams-top-seahawks?campaign=Twitter_atn

    Los Angeles Rams 30, Seattle Seahawks 27

    Pete Carroll is 2-4 vs. Sean McVay, struggling against L.A. even during the Rams’ worst days of December 2019. Add whiz kid Rams defensive coordinator Brandon Staley to the mix against a Seahawks offensive line trending the wrong way, and the Rams have more ways to win.

    in reply to: press & others (including McV) set up the Seattle game #124259
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: the new virus news & virus dark humor thread #124258
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Biden-anyone believe he can take office? #124257
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: the new virus news & virus dark humor thread #124256
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Fauci said the US has ‘no appetite’ for lockdowns but mask wearing and distancing could be enough, the day after a Biden advisor called for a weeks-long lockdown

    https://www.businessinsider.com/fauci-us-no-appetite-for-lockdown-masks-distancing-needed-2020-11

    Dr. Anthony Fauci, the top US infectious-disease expert, on Thursday said the country had “no appetite” for lockdowns but that wearing masks and social distancing could be enough to control the coronavirus outbreak.

    Fauci, who serves on the White House coronavirus task force, made the comments the day after Michael Osterholm, a COVID-19 advisor to President-elect Joe Biden, recommended a national lockdown that could last between four to six weeks in a bid to reduce the country’s infections.

    Biden himself has not advocated for a lockdown, but has called for a stronger strategy to address the health crisis. He has also repeatedly said that he will “listen to the scientists” when working on public-health policy.

    There is no indication that Fauci was responding directly to Osterholm’s suggestion of a lockdown, but said on “Good Morning America” on Thursday that there was “no appetite for locking down” among Americans.

    He did not cite evidence for this belief, though there have been anti-lockdown protests across the country since the pandemic began.

    Fauci added that “I believe that we can do it without a lockdown. I really do.”

    “The best opposite strategy to locking down is to intensify the public-health measures short of locking down,” he said. “So if you can do that well, you don’t have to take that step that people are trying to avoid, which has so many implications both psychologically and economically. We’d like not to do that.”

    He said that the US would not need to lock down if people followed other public-health advice, like wearing masks and social distancing.

    “What we need to do is what we’ve been talking about for some time now, but really doubling down on it,” he said.

    “There are certain fundamental, baseline things that you can do: universal and uniform wearing of masks; avoiding crowded, congregate situations; keeping physical distance.”

    “If we could just hang in there, do the public-health measures that we’re talking about, we’re going to get this under control, I promise you,” he added.

    While many countries have used weeks-long, localized or national lockdowns to try and control their outbreaks, the US has largely avoided that strategy, with President Donald Trump criticizing countries who have done them.

    The other measures for controlling the virus that Fauci endorsed are not being enforced either: Many US states don’t have mask mandates, and the restrictions on social gatherings vary across states.

    Biden has already created a coronavirus task force, which includes experts who have served under previous administrations during other infectious-disease outbreaks.

    Biden has also encouraged people to wear masks throughout the year.

    The US is the worst-hit country in the pandemic, having recorded the highest number of cases and deaths in the world.

    According to data from Johns Hopkins University, more than 10.5 million people in the US have tested positive for the virus, and more than 240,000 people have died.

    The US hit a record for the number of new coronavirus cases reported in a day on Thursday, with more than 150,000 new recorded. As of Thursday, more than 67,000 people were hospitalized for COVID-19 complications, an all-time high.

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124253
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124251
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124245
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124235
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    Kevin Demoff admitted the Rams can’t keep JJ, Everett and Reynolds. He does hope, however, that they can “keep some of them”

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124234
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124233
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/12 & 11/13 #124232
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

Viewing 30 posts - 17,761 through 17,790 (of 47,622 total)