Biden-anyone believe he can take office?

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Biden-anyone believe he can take office?

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 64 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #124117
    waterfield
    Participant

    I agree with WV-ewe

    This is about to be the single most important constitutional crisis since Marbury v Madison. He ain’t going away because in his heart the election results are immaterial. Moreover, there is no legal provision in the constitution or federal statutory law that provides a “mandatory” removal of the President following a defeat in the general election. Trump has already begun to defund all federal funds that are specifically designated for a “normal” transition. He commands the military. What process is available other than “tradition” for a transition.? Are we really prepared to storm the white house like a 3rd country in a coup ? Do we have the stomach for this. Trump doesn’t think so.

    #124118
    zn
    Moderator

    Well, to be honest, it doesn’t matter that he commands the military. I can’t think of any possible conditions under which the military would act to maintain him in office. If anything they would forcibly remove him. He is no longer president after a certain date and at that point Biden commands the military. And he will have no legal grounds to claim the election is void, no matter what he thinks of the fairness of the vote. His presidency expires. Removing him is easy–at a certain point he just no longer has the right to occupy office, or the white house, or to expect to be able to command the federal government.

    #124119
    waterfield
    Participant

    Well, to be honest, it doesn’t matter that he commands the military. I can’t think of any possible conditions under which the military would act to maintain him in office. If anything they would forcibly remove him. He is no longer president after a certain date and at that point Biden commands the military. And he will have no legal grounds to claim the election is void, no matter what he thinks of the fairness of the vote. His presidency expires. Removing him is easy–at a certain point he just no longer has the right to occupy office, or the white house, or to expect to be able to command the federal government.

    Keep in mind the only “official” date I know is 12/14/20 when the electoral college actually meets and cast the necessary votes. Trump can do a lot of damage to interfere with that. Not all states are under the same legal mandate to cast their votes as we assume. 70 days can give him time to do whatever he wants knowing he’s got a Republican congress in his hands. Moreover, over 40 million people do not support a transition of power. He has cards to play including the prospect of a civil war. The lawsuits seeking emergency relief are only his first step. My fear is we are in danger of losing a peaceful transition unless we exercise the 25th amendment now and to do that we need the Congress which we don’t have at this time. This could end up, god forbid, in invalidating any and all elections. We then have a true dictatorship-which may have been his goal all along.

    #124120
    zn
    Moderator

    My fear is we are in danger of losing a peaceful transition unless we exercise the 25th amendment now and to do that we need the Congress which we don’t have at this time. This could end up, god forbid, in invalidating any and all elections. We then have a true dictatorship-which may have been his goal all along.

    I think all that stuff is toothless on his part, W. Attempting to maintain the power of a dis-elected president is not only something the military would never support, it would positively resist it. What would he do then–send ICE and militias against the American military?

    And there is no Congress that would sanction disavowing direct elections.

    I’m not saying he’s going to be all accepting and reasonable.

    I’m saying there is really nothing he can actually do to stay in power.

    #124124
    waterfield
    Participant

    And there is no Congress that would sanction disavowing direct elections.

    I would hope and pray that you are right but not this Congress. They (Republicans) can’t do that because they are now in charge and looking to 2024 and are aware that over 40 million of their voters support whatever Trump will do. They won’t do anything to lose support of those voters. If you were right there would be a groundswell of Republicans in the Congress who would right now be disavowing Trump’s refusal to accept the “direct election”. So far nothing. That is because of 2024 .

    What’s is really scary to me is that 57 % of white Americans-not just men-voted that Trump continue in power. Why ? I don’t think we can put all this on corporations. There is something going on that I can’t put my finger on. Is it the increase in overt racism? If so how did we elect Obama? Are the majority of white Americans truly in fear of our changing demography? Are the majority of white Americans truly afraid that Biden is a communist? Do the majority of white Americans truly believe that COVID is a hoax and we don’t have to take precautions? Do the majority of white Americans truly believe that Trump is ordained from God to change abortion laws?

    I appreciate your knowledge of these issues and would like your input as to each of my questions. Because I have no answers.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by waterfield.
    #124126
    joemad
    Participant

    waterfield

    What’s is really scary to me is that 57 % of white Americans-not just men-voted that Trump continue in power. Why ? I don’t think we can put all this on corporations. There is something going on that I can’t put my finger on. Is it the increase in overt racism? If so how did we elect Obama?

    Check out:

    The Social Dilemma on Netflix

    The Brainwashing of My Dad on Tubi

    These two films help explain the continued support of Trump…

    From Obama to Trump to Harris as VP. As John Oliver stated on Sunday. This country is a mix of Racists and non racists folks. “That’s just who we are as a country.”

    I highly recommend watching The Social Dilemma…. describes the huge impact that Social Media is having on humanity….

    #124127
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Trump presents a unique challenge in so many ways, to say the least. First off, he’s a sociopathic monster. He has no bottom. There is nothing he won’t do to serve his own interests. Lie, cheat, steal, manufacture evidence, let people die by the hundreds of thousands. Nothing. Prior to becoming president, those traits had a limited impact, but they still harmed thousands of people. Now, he has the full force of the Executive branch behind him, plus the Senate, and the Supreme Court, and he knows the only thing standing between him and jail or forced exile is remaining president.

    I’m not worried about a military-backed coup. I’m worried about a DoJ/State Dept-backed coup. If folks don’t think Barr, Pompeo, Nosferatu and company are above manufacturing “evidence” in order to keep Trump in power and out of jail . . . they haven’t been paying attention for the last four years.

    #124128
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Also: Trump ordered the entire Executive to block any efforts by the Biden team to start the transition. Trump has thousands of political appointees who have ordered their respective fiefdoms to ignore all requests from the Biden team.

    And Trump is firing anyone who won’t go along with this, including the Defense secretary, or they’re quitting.

    This is not a done deal. Why? Again, Trump will do anything to avoid jail or forced exile, and it looks like the GOP is largely in support.

    IMO, the Dems are making a huge mistake in assuming this will all die in the courts, in their favor. They need to go on offense instead. Launch their own lawsuits against GOP voter suppression efforts, and the House should hold immediate hearings on this and the corruption of the Postal Service. They won’t. They don’t do offense. But they desperately need to.

    #124130
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Barr clears Justice Dept. to investigate alleged voting irregularities as Trump makes unfounded fraud claims

    Excerpt:

    Attorney General William P. Barr on Monday gave federal prosecutors approval to pursue allegations of “vote tabulation irregularities” in certain cases before results are certified and indicated he had already done so “in specific instances” — a reversal of long-standing Justice Department policy that quickly drew internal and external criticism for fueling unfounded claims of massive election fraud pushed by President Trump and other conservatives.

    Richard Pilger, head of the Justice Department’s Election Crimes Branch, stepped down from his position in protest over Barr’s directive — though he remains at the agency, according to people familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a politically volatile situation.

    The people said Barr had first broached a similar idea some weeks ago and that political leadership in the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, of which the Election Crimes Branch is a part, pushed back. Those officials were blindsided when Barr’s memo was released on Monday, the people said.

    ____

    This changes a roughly 40-year tradition/norm/guideline that says this isn’t done until after the election has been certified.

    #124131
    wv
    Participant

    I’m a ‘little’ worried. But not a ‘lot’ worried.

    Mainly because i think the System is fine with Biden. The CIA, NSA, Pentagon, Military, etc. If Bernie had won….i dunno.

    w
    v

    #124133
    Zooey
    Moderator

    70,000,000 people voted for 4 more years of this shit.

    The mind reels.

    #124135
    Billy_T
    Participant

    I’m a ‘little’ worried. But not a ‘lot’ worried.

    Mainly because i think the System is fine with Biden. The CIA, NSA, Pentagon, Military, etc. If Bernie had won….i dunno.

    w
    v

    You may be right, WV. But I think Trump has, ironically, proved that his own conception of the supposedly awesome power of the Deep State is nonsense, and that the Greenwalds of this world were wrong to cast it as a monolith. It if were all powerful, Trump never would have survived the Mueller probe, which we’ve recently learned, was purposely limited and truncated up front . . . nor would he have survived the impeachment process.

    No president has been this systematic in his takeover of the Executive branch, with a combination of angry threats, intimidation, and firings, especially of Inspector Generals, which once was unheard of.

    You can blunt the impact of an entrenched bureaucracy by killing off the watchdogs, appointing loyalists to manage it, and scaring everyone to death about their own futures. When you have the full support of half the duopoly, and a fanatical cult, egged on by a well-heeled mediaverse, it’s even easier.

    I’m getting worried, and I fear the Dems will be all too passive, as is their wont.

    WWDJD* in their place? The Dems don’t have that in their DNA.

    *What would Deacon Jones do

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by Billy_T.
    #124137
    Billy_T
    Participant

    70,000,000 people voted for 4 more years of this shit.

    The mind reels.

    For the last five years, Trump has broken one law after another, destroyed umpteen “norms,” and far too many Americans are just numb to it.

    Why isn’t this a “hair on fire” moment for the entire country? First time ever an incumbent loser has done this. And it might work. He’s flooded the zone with lawsuits, and set the table to win the one in Pennsylvania, primarily because they already sequestered the mail-in stuff. So a loyal Trump judge, and then the far-right SCOTUS, could just say throw them all out.

    And, of course, he’s ordered the entire executive to refuse all requests from the Biden team, and is stoking serious unrest among the far-right that it’s a “stolen election.”

    If Trump gets away with this, he’s president for life. If he lives long enough to implement further changes, the GOP will be the permanent ruling party, and we’re likely going to have the Trump family “inherit” the presidency.

    I don’t trust the Dems to put up an actual fight to stop this. Hope I’m waaay wrong. But I think we’re witnessing a . . . at least potentially . . . a successful fascist coup.

    #124138
    wv
    Participant

    I’m a ‘little’ worried. But not a ‘lot’ worried.

    Mainly because i think the System is fine with Biden. The CIA, NSA, Pentagon, Military, etc. If Bernie had won….i dunno.

    w
    v

    You may be right, WV. But I think Trump has, ironically, proved that his own conception of the supposedly awesome power of the Deep State is nonsense, and that the Greenwalds of this world were wrong to cast it as a monolith. It if were all powerful, Trump never would have survived the Mueller probe, which we’ve recently learned, was purposely limited and truncated up front . . . nor would he have survived the impeachment process.

    No president has been this systematic in his takeover of the Executive branch, with a combination of angry threats, intimidation, and firings, especially of Inspector Generals, which once was unheard of.

    You can blunt the impact of an entrenched bureaucracy by killing off the watchdogs, appointing loyalists to manage it, and scaring everyone to death about their own futures. When you have the full support of half the duopoly, and a fanatical cult, egged on by a well-heeled mediaverse, it’s even easier.

    I’m getting worried, and I fear the Dems will be all too passive, as is their wont.

    WWDJD* in their place? The Dems don’t have that in their DNA.

    *What would Deacon Jones do

    —————–

    Well you and i disagree on what Greenwald is saying. I dont think he is saying the deep-state is totally ‘monolithic.’ But i dont want to quibble over that.

    I agree with you on Trump. He has been
    the Corporotacracy version of a Clown-Caesar.

    It will be wonderful to be rid of him. No more daily trump assaults.

    Keep your fingers crossed.

    How does one govern a nation like this. So many large factions.

    And the real-left is so tiny. What did the green party get this time? Two percent again? 75 million for Biden. 70 Million for Trump. 350,000 for Howie.

    Now lets say a lot of lefties voted for biden out of a strategic sense. So lets be generous and give the Left another, oh, 5 million. That would be 70 Million Biden-ists. 70 million Trumpists. And 5 or 6 million leftist/progressives.

    Not a pretty picture.

    w
    v

    #124139
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Well you and i disagree on what Greenwald is saying. I dont think he is saying the deep-state is totally ‘monolithic.’ But i dont want to quibble over that.

    I agree with you on Trump. He has been
    the Corporotacracy version of a Clown-Caesar.

    It will be wonderful to be rid of him. No more daily trump assaults.

    Keep your fingers crossed.

    How does one govern a nation like this. So many large factions.

    And the real-left is so tiny. What did the green party get this time? Two percent again? 75 million for Biden. 70 Million for Trump. 350,000 for Howie.

    Now lets say a lot of lefties voted for biden out of a strategic sense. So lets be generous and give the Left another, oh, 5 million. That would be 70 Million Biden-ists. 70 million Trumpists. And 5 or 6 million leftist/progressives.

    Not a pretty picture.

    w
    v

    We may just be too big.

    I would love it if we leftists could form a breakaway nation, set it up from scratch, democratically, according to all of our ideals, principles, goals, etc. But I want mountains and the ocean. Gotta have that!!

    Of course, since we’re an unruly and diverse lot, it wouldn’t be smooth sailing for us, either. But damn if it wouldn’t be better than this existing shit-show.

    I’d much rather argue with all of those sub-groups you’ve listed on your twitter-anthropology quest, than the radically destructive debates with center-right Dems and the far-right GOP. Tragically, as you know, that’s about the most narrow “dialogue” in the so-called “developed” world.

    No real answers from moi. Just more questions, and way too much anxiety.

    #124140
    Zooey
    Moderator

    <
    For the last five years, Trump has broken one law after another, destroyed umpteen “norms,” and far too many Americans are just numb to it.

    Why isn’t this a “hair on fire” moment for the entire country? First time ever an incumbent loser has done this. And it might work. He’s flooded the zone with lawsuits, and set the table to win the one in Pennsylvania, primarily because they already sequestered the mail-in stuff. So a loyal Trump judge, and then the far-right SCOTUS, could just say throw them all out.

    And, of course, he’s ordered the entire executive to refuse all requests from the Biden team, and is stoking serious unrest among the far-right that it’s a “stolen election.”

    If Trump gets away with this, he’s president for life. If he lives long enough to implement further changes, the GOP will be the permanent ruling party, and we’re likely going to have the Trump family “inherit” the presidency.

    I don’t trust the Dems to put up an actual fight to stop this. Hope I’m waaay wrong. But I think we’re witnessing a . . . at least potentially . . . a successful fascist coup.

    The task is enormous, though. They have to have some kind of legal pretext to throw out votes, and it has to pass at least 2 courts, a state court, and the SCOTUS. At least, I think that’s how it works. They really cannot just say, “These ballots were mailed, so they should be thrown out.” That just won’t fly.

    Then…they have to throw out results from at least 3 states. Even if they twisted PA, it wouldn’t matter. They have to execute three successful challenges. That seems like a Herculean task to me.

    #124141
    zn
    Moderator

    And the real-left is so tiny. What did the green party get this time? Two percent again? 75 million for Biden.

    I would not take voter turnout for the green party as any indication of what an actual left/progressive voting bloc might look like. This time around everyone knew the stakes and that meant, for a large percentage, voting for Biden. Meanwhile the number of actual progressives who get voted in, when the DNC lets them run, is interesting. Again, for example, indications are Charles Booker would have actually beaten McConnelly, as opposed to rag-doll whats-her-name.

    #124142
    Billy_T
    Participant

    <
    For the last five years, Trump has broken one law after another, destroyed umpteen “norms,” and far too many Americans are just numb to it.

    Why isn’t this a “hair on fire” moment for the entire country? First time ever an incumbent loser has done this. And it might work. He’s flooded the zone with lawsuits, and set the table to win the one in Pennsylvania, primarily because they already sequestered the mail-in stuff. So a loyal Trump judge, and then the far-right SCOTUS, could just say throw them all out.

    And, of course, he’s ordered the entire executive to refuse all requests from the Biden team, and is stoking serious unrest among the far-right that it’s a “stolen election.”

    If Trump gets away with this, he’s president for life. If he lives long enough to implement further changes, the GOP will be the permanent ruling party, and we’re likely going to have the Trump family “inherit” the presidency.

    I don’t trust the Dems to put up an actual fight to stop this. Hope I’m waaay wrong. But I think we’re witnessing a . . . at least potentially . . . a successful fascist coup.

    The task is enormous, though. They have to have some kind of legal pretext to throw out votes, and it has to pass at least 2 courts, a state court, and the SCOTUS. At least, I think that’s how it works. They really cannot just say, “These ballots were mailed, so they should be thrown out.” That just won’t fly.

    Then…they have to throw out results from at least 3 states. Even if they twisted PA, it wouldn’t matter. They have to execute three successful challenges. That seems like a Herculean task to me.

    Again, hope you guys are right. But Trump, Barr and company are simply not above creating and planting false evidence. They did that with Hunter Biden’s magic laptop, that just happened to wind up in the hands of a diehard Trump supporter/computer shop.

    The main thing these judges have been saying when they toss the lawsuits (so far) is you don’t have any evidence of fraud. What happens when they manufacture it and get their cultists to act as “witnesses”?

    To me, once a political party has a growing cult of people who believe the other party literally eats babies, drinks their adrenaline, and engages in teen sex-trafficking, nothing is off the table

    Late morning isn’t too early to start drinking heavily, right?

    #124145
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Which reminds me, Zooey. How did your proposed imitation of the Ginger Man go the other day?

    Tequila, or Whiskey?

    #124146
    zn
    Moderator

    The main thing these judges have been saying when they toss the lawsuits (so far) is you don’t have any evidence of fraud. What happens when they manufacture it and get their cultists to act as “witnesses”?

    Prediction? It would go nowhere.

    #124147
    Billy_T
    Participant

    The main thing these judges have been saying when they toss the lawsuits (so far) is you don’t have any evidence of fraud. What happens when they manufacture it and get their cultists to act as “witnesses”?

    Prediction? It would go nowhere.

    Thanks.

    You guys are lifting my spirits a bit so I may not have to lift some other spirits.

    ;>)

    And it counts more cuz, in general, this crowd is a deeply pessimistic, doom and gloom, buzz-killing crowd, for the most part.

    Again,

    :>)

    #124148
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Except when you guys get all . . .

    #124150
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    #124153
    Zooey
    Moderator

    Which reminds me, Zooey. How did your proposed imitation of the Ginger Man go the other day?

    Tequila, or Whiskey?

    I went with tequila, but I made it only two shots deep into my drinking before the fun went out of the evening. I had some tentative plan to make up a game with names I would toast to when they got defeated, but the election did not go well, and I shut it off when it was looking like a 50/50 toss-up.

    #124160
    waterfield
    Participant

    the task is enormous, though. They have to have some kind of legal pretext to throw out votes, and it has to pass at least 2 courts, a state court, and the SCOTUS. At least, I think that’s how it works. They really cannot just say, “These ballots were mailed, so they should be thrown out.” That just won’t fly.

    It will be state by state and decided by the highest court in each state-not the US Supreme Ct. Each state has it’s own constitution and the final determinations of any alleged violation of state election laws are not reviewable by the US Supreme Ct. unless the state’s election procedure has violated federal law or the US Constitution. Bush v Gore was a very unusual circumstance and arguably the single worst decision ever made by the Court with separate opinions by each jurist sitting. How the court found a US federal violation either by federal statute or the Constitution is what baffles scholars today. The order by the US Supreme Court that Florida Supreme Court’s decision to keep counting Florida votes must stop was based on the simple notion that the USSC had jurisdiction because the founders had provided for each state to make its own election laws. How circular is that ? Most Constitutional scholars believe the matter should have ended with the Florida Supreme Court.

    I’m sure there is a far better explanation re Bush v Gore. All I know is that most constitutional lawyers-at least the ones I drink with-don’t believe the US Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear the issues being raised in these Trump lawsuits alleging voter fraud. The Republicans can’t argue voter fraud in Pennsylvania is against federal law-its against Pennsylvania’s election laws. So it is only about overturning the state’s election and not the entire election. Its a state by state jurisdiction.
    c

    #124161
    waterfield
    Participant

    One last note on Bush v Gore: If I recall the decision specifically stated that the case was limited to the particular facts of that case meaning it did not carry precedent.

    #124164
    Zooey
    Moderator

    <
    It will be state by state and decided by the highest court in each state-not the US Supreme Ct. Each state has it’s own constitution and the final determinations of any alleged violation of state election laws are not reviewable by the US Supreme Ct. unless the state’s election procedure has violated federal law or the US Constitution. Bush v Gore was a very unusual circumstance and arguably the single worst decision ever made by the Court with separate opinions by each jurist sitting. How the court found a US federal violation either by federal statute or the Constitution is what baffles scholars today. The order by the US Supreme Court that Florida Supreme Court’s decision to keep counting Florida votes must stop was based on the simple notion that the USSC had jurisdiction because the founders had provided for each state to make its own election laws. How circular is that ? Most Constitutional scholars believe the matter should have ended with the Florida Supreme Court.

    I’m sure there is a far better explanation re Bush v Gore. All I know is that most constitutional lawyers-at least the ones I drink with-don’t believe the US Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear the issues being raised in these Trump lawsuits alleging voter fraud. The Republicans can’t argue voter fraud in Pennsylvania is against federal law-its against Pennsylvania’s election laws. So it is only about overturning the state’s election and not the entire election. Its a state by state jurisdiction.
    c

    Interesting. Thanks.

    #124170
    InvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’ll be honest. some of you guys got me a little shook. i mean this couldn’t possibly happen could it? could trump turn this country into a dictatorship? that would have to be the mother of all hail marys.

    #124176
    waterfield
    Participant

    i’ll be honest. some of you guys got me a little shook. i mean this couldn’t possibly happen could it? could trump turn this country into a dictatorship? that would have to be the mother of all hail marys.[/quote

    1933-Germany

    #124181
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Trump fired Mark Esper & hired Christopher Miller, who says, Osama bin Laden is sill alive.

    Trump also fired for of the top Officials in the Pentagon. He decided to hire Anthony Tata as Pentagon Policy Chief. This guy is known as a nut job. He believes in this QAnon stuff.

    Trump is doing whatever to take America down with him, by destroying it.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 64 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.