Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipantShouldn’t we burn sage,
or light candles,
or somethin.“No new Injuries” — I dunno.
Is that the Patriots battle-cry?
Seattle?I hope Fisher knows what
he’s a-doin.w
v
wvParticipantRandom quote:
“I wanted to see whether or not the great Louis XIV style, which I consider the most beautiful style, could work in a modern building. I didn’t want to buy old columns, because they’re cracked and broken. I waited to have brand-new minted marble columns… I’ve used all onyx. Onyx is a precious stone, many times more beautiful. I don’t believe there is an apartment like this anywhere in the world. The view, the solid bronze window frames, the fountain all brand new and carved. Did you see the way the window shades go up and down, all remote? And they’re bulletproof… I don’t care about material needs. I could be happy in a studio apartment with a television and a telephone.” Donald Trump
wvParticipant<span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>from off the net</span>
==
<span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: red”>thehammer</span>
reason for optimism?
logically this team looks like a 6-10 team if you just project last years production onto the 2015 roster but there is hope…sort ofdline..odds are Quinn is still the guy who is dominated by good ot’s BUT he might play to his 2013 level. 10.5 sacks in 2012, 19 in 2013 and 10.5 in 2014..which year is the outlier? What happens in 2015?
Stedman Bailey is too short and too slow but that acrobatic youtube catch where he catches a ball one handed after doing a flip speaks volumes about his desire..desire matters. He does have the eye of the tiger
Just to quibble — Bailey is not slow. He’s fast enough to be a dangerous possession reciever
who can sometimes get past the defense.Quinn is elite in my view, and i have zero concerns about him.
This is not a 6-10 team anymore, as far as ‘talent’ goes. Its got the talent
to be a playoff team. The only question now, in my mind is: Health.They are ready to roll, if they stay healthy. Just my opin-yun.
w
v
wvParticipantDo you think any of the UDFA’s will
have a future with the rams, Ag?w
v
wvParticipantUse of cell phones for any reason is prohibited while at practice. Reporters may not tweet from practice, and media members may not at any point report details on personnel groups, formations, specific plays, or any information that would compromise the team’s strategic efforts. The Rams have a zero tolerance policy regarding the dissemination of strategic information gathered from practice.
Is that new?
Or have we got all that information from posters in the past?
I think i remember reading some griping
about it from reporters last year.Though, its possible i was having
ayahuasca flashbacks or something.
I dunno.They damn well better practice hard,
and they better devise a great game plan
for Seattle.I want heads to roll in that first game.
The Seahawks must be destroyed.And if it takes deflated balls,
so be it. Lets just get the Ring,
and worry about the suspensions
next year.w
vMay 26, 2015 at 3:57 pm in reply to: take an early guess…what will the offensive approach be? #25306
wvParticipantWell, it wont be the GSOT,
that much we know. Sigh.I dunno what it ‘will’ look like
but I’ll just say this —
I hope ta GOD that the Rams Offense
can finally, master the medium-passing-game.Lord, do i miss that.
Its been a while.
w
v
wvParticipantSince you are a very old man now,
i think you should give us
some words of wisdom, Pa-ram.
Words to live by.w
v
wvParticipantThe Rams were the most self-destructive team
in the NFL. Maybe they need to learn
to love themselves. Maybe they need
to find inner peace.It goes without saying that
that must have factored into Fisher’s
notion to ‘simplify’ things a bit on offense,
as well as beef up the OLine.w
v
wvParticipantI wonder which team will be next.
I mean, he can probably pay
for another plane ticket.w
v
wvParticipantA Karl Marx quote, fwiw:
“there is one great fact, characteristic of this our nineteenth century, a fact which no party dares deny. On the one hand, there have started into life industrial and scientific forces which no epoch of former human history had ever suspected. On the other hand, there exist symptoms of decay, far surpassing the horrors recorded of the latter times of the Roman empire. In our days everything seems pregnant with its contrary. Machinery, gifted with the wonderful power of shortening and fructifying human labor, we behold starving and overworking it. The new-fangled sources of wealth, by some strange weird spell, are turned into sources of want. The victories of art seem bought by the loss of character. At the same pace that mankind masters nature, man seems to become enslaved to other men or to his own infamy. Even the pure light of science seems unable to shine but on the dark background of ignorance. All our invention and progress seem to result in endowing material forces with intellectual life, and in stultifying human life into a material force.”
https://zcomm.org/recent-quotes/page/26/
wvParticipantI’m getting ‘more’ mentally lazy in my old age. Actually, the doubling rule of thumb thing would have it at 30 X 2 = 60 X 2 = 120 X 2 = 240 so 240 Million is approximate answer and then add to it whatever the LA market glamour factor. If one doesn’t think it’s worth much, let the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim owner know that too.
I’m not even sure I understand the principle
behind the “relocation fee.” Why, exactly
does one owner have to pay the other owners money
in order to move a team? Whats the logic there?
I mean if the League makes a bit ‘more’ money
with a team in LA — then shouldnt ‘they’
pay Kroenke to move to LA ?w
v
wvParticipantAnother random quote,
i came across. I do not know
who this ‘Carpentier’ is, btw :“…I was a terrible history student. They taught me history as if it were a visit to a wax museum or to the land of the dead. I was over twenty before I discovered that the past was neither quiet nor mute. I discovered it reading novels by Carpentier and poems by Neruda. I discovered it listening to stories over coffee about some old, very old, warrior on the Uruguayan plains who kept his tired eyelids open with orangewood twigs while he speared enemy horsemen on the point of his lance. Asking and wondering, from where did this planet that we inabit come? This planet that spends a million dollars on arms every minute, so that every minute thirty children can die of disease or hunger and no one is accused. Asking and wondering: This world, this slaughterhouse, this nuthouse, is this the work of God or man? What past time gave birth to this present? Why have some countries become owners of other countries, and some men owners of other men, and men owners of women, and women of children, and things owners of people?
I am not a historian. I am a writer obsessed with remembering, with remembering the past of America above all, and above all that of Latin America, intimate land condemned to amnesia.”Eduardo Galeano, We Say No 1992
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by
wv.
May 25, 2015 at 1:04 pm in reply to: what the college spread & new CBA did to OL coaching (Rams come up) #25255
wvParticipantInteresting what Boudreau actually said about Greg Robinson —
“..Greg Robinson as a rookie has more talent and is a better player than Willie Roaf. Willie had a great coach…”w
v
wvParticipantJust curious — Did Georgia have to pay a
Relocation fee back in 95 ? What was it?edit: yes. http://articles.latimes.com/1995-04-13/news/mn-54268_1_rams-owner
TJ Simers – LA Times
April 1995IRVING, Tex. — The Los Angeles Rams are history, officially gone from Anaheim to St. Louis after winning the National Football League’s blessing Wednesday with a $46-million payment.
In addition to a $29-million relocation fee, the Rams agreed to pay $17 million from the proceeds of personal seat licenses, which are one-time fees for rights to buy season tickets.
Twenty-three of the 30 league owners must approve a franchise move, and they voted 22 to 6 in favor Wednesday, with the Los Angeles Raiders abstaining. Rams owner Georgia Frontiere, who had been asked to remain outside during the special meeting, was then called on to cast the deciding vote.
“I thought about it for a few minutes,” she joked.
“My grandmother had a saying: ‘Go little where wanted, go not at all where little wanted.’ And that’s about the way it’s been (in Anaheim). I think they will be better off too,” Frontiere said.
w
v-
This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantIf you dont like War,
maybe you should just move
to North Korea.w
v
wvParticipantNot Utopian at all.
The powerful will always exploit the non-powerful for their own gains.
The film was incredibly sad to me. I’ve never been in those men’s shoes. I’ve never had that few limited options or that sort of hopelessness. While I’ve thought at times that I may have underachieved a bit(just a bit) it doesn’t matter because, I’m doing what I want to do–living a simple life, a secure life(at least as secure as anyone can hope to have)and I’ve provided for my family. They’ve never wanted for anything, never gone hungry, my kids have had the opportunity for higher education. I have no regrets. I’ve been very fortunate.
I have not been in the sort of desperate situation those men are, from where I am now(middle class), to where I’ve come from(and I would consider that lower middle class to borderline poor). I’ve not had bad choices or less bad choices as my options.
These men are affected not just by circumstance, but also by the environment that has emerged from that, a violent Darwinian culture.
I am grateful not to have lived their lives.
Well, as i have learned more about life
and politics in my old age,
I have come to despise…Corporate-Capitalism.
Thats all i’m gonna say.w
v
“The basic law of capitalism is you or I, not both you and I.”
Karl Liebknecht“The rule of law does not do away with the unequal distribution of wealth and power,
but reinforces that inequality with the authority of law.”
Howard Zinn-
This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by
wv.
May 25, 2015 at 8:43 am in reply to: what the college spread & new CBA did to OL coaching (Rams come up) #25239
wvParticipantINteresting.
I’m sure none of the coaches like the CBA restrictions.
I just wonder if the players actually like
the restrictions. Maybe Greg Robinson
would have ‘wanted’ to talk to the pro coaches
earlier.w
v
wvParticipantGreat post, Pa.
This aint a Utopian society
we have goin here, is it.Sigh
w
v
wvParticipantThey’ve had a good defense – why mess with it?
I dunno, about them 49ers, this year.
I could see them finishing last.w
v
wvParticipantI was wrong about Austin Davis.
I thought he was going to be really good,
but he proved to have some serious limitations.w
v
wvParticipant16 and 0 this year RFL.
I’m tellin ya — this is our year!w
v
“I love Zack and he knows that. But this is exactly where we differ!
Zack is in the fetal position, but my head is in the oven! No amount of semantics can change this.”
Zooey’d For Life
wvParticipant“Tell a man whose house is on fire to give a moderate alarm; tell him to moderately rescue his wife from the hands of the ravisher; tell the mother to gradually extricate her babe from the fire into which it has fallen; but urge me not to use moderation in a cause like the present.”
William Lloyd Garrison
https://zcomm.org/recent-quotes/page/7/w
v
wvParticipantI saw it. Yup – Road Warrior on steroids and acid.
Its awesome to look at. Fast and furious — much like the GSOT
in the Viking playoff game.Long, long chase scenes. With no humor. Not like Indiana Jones
chase scenes.If Salvadore Dali took some speed, and made a movie, it might look
like this one.w
vPersonally, my only complaint (and it’s minor, really) is that I don’t like Hardy’s Max as much as Miller’s Max.
Miller’s Max was a burned out, cynical loner who knew he had more skill and resources than anyone he faced. In the end he doesn’t even help the refinery people because he cares…he does so because he has no choice. His signature line is “I am the best chance you’ve got.” He’s always bargaining. Contracts are big in that movie.
The Gyro Captain: Look, we had a deal. I show you the gas, and you let me go, right?
Max: The arrangement was I wouldn’t kill you.
The Gyro Captain: After all I’ve done for you…
Max: I reckon you got a bargain, didn’t you?Hardy’s Max is more of a burned out homeless guy. A homeless guy who talks to himself. He changes in the course of the film and identifies with Furioso out of sheer sympathy, and a chance for redemption by helping.
I am not complaining about that part.
I just personally liked the Miller Max better because this Max is too victimized and even comic. More Buster Keaton. For example his moments of high action effectiveness (like with the tank/car in the night…”that’s not his blood”…) come out of nowhere.
I thought the clunkiest scenes were the two
(I think there were two?) where one of the characters
expressly used the word “redemption.”The writing in those scenes lacked subtlety, nuance.
As far as the difference in the two Max’s — I agree
with you about the first Max, but I really dont have
any idea who this Max was. Other than the ‘haunted by guilt’
aspect, i really didnt pick up on any character development at all.
There just wasn’t much there.I am guessing the Next Max movie will be the opposite — lots
of character development and a lot less car crashing.w
vWell he goes from being the haunted loner who is willing to just drive off and leave them there to the guy who talks them into their (to avoid spoilers) endgame strategy. He does it because he identifies with the pain of someone else.
Also remember he gives blood twice, for 2 different reasons. The second one shows he has changed.
So they was some character development IMO.
I just don’t particularly care for this Max v. the old Max, yet at the same time it’s a very minor complaint.
I have no clue what was going on with the blood in the tube,
when he’s strapped to the car, early on. WTF was going on there?
I had thought his blood was maybe running the vehicle,
but the person i saw the movie with said no.w
v
wvParticipantI saw it. Yup – Road Warrior on steroids and acid.
Its awesome to look at. Fast and furious — much like the GSOT
in the Viking playoff game.Long, long chase scenes. With no humor. Not like Indiana Jones
chase scenes.If Salvadore Dali took some speed, and made a movie, it might look
like this one.w
vPersonally, my only complaint (and it’s minor, really) is that I don’t like Hardy’s Max as much as Miller’s Max.
Miller’s Max was a burned out, cynical loner who knew he had more skill and resources than anyone he faced. In the end he doesn’t even help the refinery people because he cares…he does so because he has no choice. His signature line is “I am the best chance you’ve got.” He’s always bargaining. Contracts are big in that movie.
The Gyro Captain: Look, we had a deal. I show you the gas, and you let me go, right?
Max: The arrangement was I wouldn’t kill you.
The Gyro Captain: After all I’ve done for you…
Max: I reckon you got a bargain, didn’t you?Hardy’s Max is more of a burned out homeless guy. A homeless guy who talks to himself. He changes in the course of the film and identifies with Furioso out of sheer sympathy, and a chance for redemption by helping.
I am not complaining about that part.
I just personally liked the Miller Max better because this Max is too victimized and even comic. More Buster Keaton. For example his moments of high action effectiveness (like with the tank/car in the night…”that’s not his blood”…) come out of nowhere.
I thought the clunkiest scenes were the two
(I think there were two?) where one of the characters
expressly used the word “redemption.”The writing in those scenes lacked subtlety, nuance.
As far as the difference in the two Max’s — I agree
with you about the first Max, but I really dont have
any idea who this Max was. Other than the ‘haunted by guilt’
aspect, i really didnt pick up on any character development at all.
There just wasn’t much there.I am guessing the Next Max movie will be the opposite — lots
of character development and a lot less car crashing.w
vMay 22, 2015 at 12:52 pm in reply to: How do you feel about a starting tackle pair of Robinson & Havenstein? #25106
wvParticipantJokes aside, actually yer right.
Threads like this are supposed to be free-for-alls of different views,
not “who’s right” death matches.Ok, fine, but where is the
“who’s right Death Match thread” ?w
vMay 22, 2015 at 9:52 am in reply to: Don Shula accused of pushing painkillers in ex-NFL players' lawsuit #25088
wvParticipantOld School Culture,
Meet the New School Culture.w
v
wvParticipantI saw it. Yup – Road Warrior on steroids and acid.
Its awesome to look at. Fast and furious — much like the GSOT
in the Viking playoff game.Long, long chase scenes. With no humor. Not like Indiana Jones
chase scenes.If Salvadore Dali took some speed, and made a movie, it might look
like this one.w
v-
This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by
wv.
May 21, 2015 at 11:20 pm in reply to: Brady to be suspended…which will happen…when? a May-July saga #25064
wvParticipantRevis speaks his mind
dont he.w
v
wvParticipantI’m in favor of adopting the New England formula:
1 Great Coach
2 Great QB
3 Intelligent, mentally-tough, team-first players who dont need to cheat to win.
4 Lots of cheatingw
v
wvParticipantYeah, i posted about that book a while back. It was a pretty lame
book, but the part about Belichick’s “let thurman run” strategy was
very interesting. It was a tough sales job on the Giant defenders,
and I’m not sure they really bought into it.At any rate, i agree with zn that passing and running
mesh with one another. One helps the other.
Being one dimensional is a flaw, i would say.Having said that, if i had to be one-dimensional,
I’d rather have a good passing team, in today’s NFL.The disagreements I’ve seen on the internetz
about Running vs Passing, always tend to sound like
“magnifcation of minor differences” to me, btw.w
v -
This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

