Forum Replies Created
-
Well they aren’t mutually exclusive categories.
I am not sure i needed
to see TomBrady in his underwear
today.I would have eliminated Brady
from my draft-board,
just on the basis of that photo alone.I wonder if he read
“Where The Red Fern Grows.”w
v;What round will
you pick a goofy looking QB? Or aren’t there any in this year’s draft?I’m thinking Bridge is a strong possibility.
He has the goofy face,
but I’m not sure about his
hand size.
w
v
==
STRENGTHS: Tall, narrow body type with athletic footwork and long-striding speed to pick up yards with his legs. Elite-level arm strength and release quickness with the ability to add velocity and extra RPM’s on his throws with ease. Not shy about testing tight windows and trusts his arm to make frozen rope throws and put the ball anywhere he wants on the field.He has mobility to keep the play alive when the pocket breaks down, shaking off arm tackles and stepping up with his eyes downfield. Shows the ability to work through his reads and is a quick thinker to make snap decisions. Displayed outstanding toughness playing through an ankle injury most of November 2014.
WEAKNESSES: Bridge has improved field vision, but needs to develop his eye use and tends to stare down receivers, often leading defenders to his intended target. His receivers will struggle to handle his fastball at times and Bridge needs to develop a change-up and overall better touch to all levels. His mechanics and accuracy need refined, but neither needs an overhaul.
With only a dozen collegiate games under his belt, Bridge doesn’t have the ideal experience and might need a season or two to develop before he’s ready for consistent game reps, requiring a patient NFL team.
COMPARES TO: Colin Kaepernick, 49ers — Bridge is tall and lean with a rocket launcher on his right shoulder like the 49ers quarterback and has more than enough velocity on his passes to toss ropes to all levels of the field.
–Dane Brugler (12/4/14)
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1776297/brandon-bridge
You know, ideally…this could be one of those trades that works out well for both sides.
Foles is more of an improviser and IMO that didn’t fit Kelly but it fits with Fisher.
Bradford is more of a learn it and implement it guy, and that fits well with Kelly.
Looks that way to me.
Assuming they both stay healthy.
I think they are both set up for success
on paper.w
vFairley basically finishes out Langford’s contract on a prove it basis. I can live with that.
I’m surprised he settled for a one-year deal. I would have
thought he could have gotten a multi-year deal somewhere.I’m excited about the DLine. They started So SLOW
last year. It was awful. But now, one would think
they know GW’s system and they oughta be able
to start fast.I know nothing about Fairley.
Is he a run-stopper only or an allround player?
What does he do best?w
vWell Jim did get duped. The Snishers have been saying, forever, how much they love Bradford. Then this happens, with not even a hint dropped beforehand. Jim probably feels like he got played a little. I don’t know. He’s a pro, though, and he knows the NFL is full of misinformation, and disinformation. Everybody gets fooled, once in a while.
Regarding the trade, people can say whatever they want, but I still think Bradford would be on this team if he had taken a drastic pay cut, but with an incentive laden contract. Bradford and his agent didn’t want to do that. The Rams played the only hand they had left, trade him. That’s the teams only leverage, so they used it.
IMO, the Rams made a good trade. We’ll see how it plays out.
I always thought the paycut talk was utter nonsense.
For the life of me, i saw no reason in the world
why he would take a pay cut. It just seemed like fan-talk
to me. Now i could see him getting an “extension” with
lots of incentive clauses — but a “pay cut” — no way.
Why would he do that?w
v
