Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 9,511 through 9,540 (of 12,325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2016 draft, receivers & TEs #36453
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    For-The-Love-Of-GOD-Can-The-Rams-Draft-A-Good-ROUTE-RUNNER

    FTLOG-CRDAGR

    I’m just going to keep repeating that
    until it comes true…FTLOG-CRDAGR.

    w
    v

    in reply to: no Gurley? #36412
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “…Gurley… was credited with 1,108 yards following the Seattle game, but a league review ruled that he fumbled at the 11-yard line in the fourth quarter against the Seahawks instead of the 9, thus subtracting two yards from his rushing total.”

    More iron-clad proof,
    the NFL hates the Rams.

    This aggression will not stand.
    w
    v

    in reply to: Tweets 12/31 – some roster moves #36398
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    WTF? Gurley is in a walking boot?
    Damn, that should be the headline
    in any story on Sunday’s game.

    How are the Rams gonna play
    offense without Gurley?

    w
    v

    in reply to: can the Rams somehow challenge the 49ers? #36395
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So when is the last time the Rams
    won four in a row? I can’t remember.

    Fisher hasn’t done it as a Ram.
    Spags didnt either, I don’t think.
    Did Linehan?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Tweets 12/31 – some roster moves #36393
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Fairly has had a lot of snaps during
    this win streak hasn’t he?
    He may be missed Sunday.

    w
    v

    in reply to: happy new year #36392
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So 2016 is gonna be a playoff year,
    right?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Laram on Kaepernik #36391
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>I always liked Kaepernik. He would be better than Foles. Do we have anybody who can catch his fast balls?</span>

    I think you are confused about this whole
    football thing — it is important
    NOT to like 49ers.

    Think of them as big ugly Sperm
    whales who attack innocent
    defenseless Squids.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Star Wars #36381
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    why does
    the public want apocalyptic stuff these days?

    That’s a long story.

    But it’s not the suits driving that. That’s actually popular in its own terms.

    I might add, btw, that it’s not just film. And it’s all kinds of fiction, too. Young adult, mangas, comic books, popular fiction, and even high-brow fiction (McCarthy, The Road).

    There’s lots of reasons for all of this.

    BTW this is the 2ND era of popular interest in post-apocalyptic writing and film…the 1st was the 50s.

    .

    Well, i didn’t mean the suits were driving the issue, I mean
    the suits probably took a lot of surveys and did focus groups and “figured out” that the public is in the mood for Apocalyptic stories.

    The fifties, I assume were about the threat of Nuk-u-lar war with
    the Rooskies. But now, I’m guessing the fears are a little different.
    Environmental and Social/Political collapse I spose.

    Anyway, I’m all for it. The Collapse I mean. I think the planet
    needs a do-over. I’d like to see what the Dolphins would do
    if they evolve a little bit more.

    w
    v

    in reply to: PFF on Tru & the Rams secondary #36380
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The secondary has come of age, this year.
    And Gaines is still an option next year.

    I sure hope they can keep JJ and TJ.

    w
    v

    in reply to: win over Seattle, reactions from around the net #36379
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think i agree with CoachO.

    The “personnel is limiting the game-plan” view
    seems the ‘most likely’ to me.

    I think if Fisher had A.Rogers and
    O’Dell Beckham and an experienced OLine,
    we’d see him open it up more.

    w
    v

    in reply to: how often have the Rams sacked Russell Wilson #36369
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Rams’ DL has a knack for introducing QBs to “gravity.” Even if William Hayes is skeptical that gravity exists.

    Well have you ever SEEN “gravity” ?

    w
    v

    Seriously?

    What do you think keeps rainbows from floating away?

    Pfft.

    Mermaids hold’em down.

    Maybe you are just a product
    of that Cali-forn-I-A education system.

    So are they going to LA or not?

    w
    v

    in reply to: how often have the Rams sacked Russell Wilson #36364
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Rams’ DL has a knack for introducing QBs to “gravity.” Even if William Hayes is skeptical that gravity exists.

    Well have you ever SEEN “gravity” ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: in praise of Havenstein #36363
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It reminds me of BigFoot and Giant Squids and other things.

    Are you saying the Rams offense reminds
    you of a squid ?

    I dont see any reason to be casting
    aspersions onto giant squids.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Most disappointing Ram(other than Nick Foles) #36358
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Cook came to mind because they actually went out and paid a lot of money for him. Quick is a bad 2nd round pick, true. But, I never expected much from him.

    I can’t think of a single defensive player who disappoints.

    I was thinking about that too. This regime knows defense
    and special teams.

    Offense though?

    w
    v

    in reply to: I think I'm in love with Jill Stein #36335
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ditto
    w
    v

    in reply to: Eagles fire Kelly/ 9ers hire Kelly #36334
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “… started to doubt whether Kelly The Innovative Coach was quite smart enough to overcome Kelly The Personnel Demagogue.”

    This will sound familiar
    to ram fans.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Most disappointing Ram(other than Nick Foles) #36333
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Stedman.

    w
    v

    in reply to: in praise of Havenstein #36315
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Somethin about him reminds me of most
    of the Olinemen on the 99 championship team.

    w
    v

    in reply to: what SF fans are saying #36307
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “Rams will throw the game so that Niners keep Tomsula”

    Man, there is some strange shit
    that goes on in the minds
    of human beings.
    And probably Mermaids, too.

    w
    v

    in reply to: can the Rams somehow challenge the 49ers? #36306
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Does the Universe want Fisher
    to have Seven wins
    or Eight wins.

    Who’s feeling lucky?

    w
    v

    in reply to: William Hayes doesn't believe dinosaurs existed #36305
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I will say this—if William Hayes believes more in mermaids than dinosaurs I am NOT gonna be the one to tell him he’s wrong.

    Nittany should do it. He’s a science geek. Let him explain it to Mr. Hayes.

    Nittany? Heck Nittany is behind the conspiracy.

    I bet Nittany is one of the ones going around
    planting “dinosaur” bones in the ground.

    I have spoken to mermaids about this,
    and they dont believe in dinosaurs either.
    The Unicorns dont either.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Eagles fire Kelly/ 9ers hire Kelly #36275
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    He won more games than Fisher.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Horns pierce the Seahawks: Post-game thread #36270
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I loved it.

    I can’t get enough of the Rams dominating the Seahawks. The Rams are in their heads now. They have no psychological advantage against the Rams heading into next year. To me, this win is about the Rams vs. the Seahawks. And, it’s oh so nice to see it go down like this. Domination in the trenches. Out-physicaling the physical ‘Hawks. We’re in their domes. No doubt. And, yes, the Seahawks wanted to win just as badly. This is THEIR turf. This is the home of the 12th Man. Nobody else wins here. They can’t let St. Louis, which has been successful upsetting Seattle in STL, come in there and win.

    Yet, they did. And, that meant something to the Seahawks.

    It also means that the Rams CAN score against a good team in difficult situations. This was not a great offensive effort, but it was an effective one. That started with the O-line, which gives me hope for next year.

    Now, what we don’t know is if the Rams can win when there’s something truly on the line. They haven’t done that, yet. That needs to come next year. Has to. Must. No excuses. ABSOLUTELY no excuses next year. The Rams should have depth at key positions, including the O-line. They should have a good game manager QB, at the least. And, they should have a great D again.

    Yes, I think there’s reason for optimism.

    Much depends on Quinn though, imho.

    Back surgery is very very tricky.
    Can he work out? Will he be the same?
    Will he be in pain from now on?

    Quinn is now a big question mark.

    w
    v

    in reply to: RamView, 12/27/2015: Rams 23, Seahawks 17 (Long) #36269
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I know one of the announcers said Fisher/Boras had “simplified” the third-down plays.

    Whatever that means.

    He narrowed them down to one simple goal: getting a 1st down.

    BTW the Rams 3rd down conversions Sunday were at 41.6%. If it were that way the whole season Rams would be ranked 10th on 3rd down conversion rate.

    Well, i dont know what he/you mean by that: “narrowed them down to one goal: getting a first down”

    w
    v

    in reply to: RamView, 12/27/2015: Rams 23, Seahawks 17 (Long) #36266
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    A fine question. I wish I thought I knew the answer.

    …Mainly I’d speculate Boras has simplified the running game and lets his blockers do what they’re better at.
    –Mike

    I know one of the announcers said Fisher/Boras had “simplified” the third-down plays.

    Whatever that means.

    w
    v

    in reply to: RamView, 12/27/2015: Rams 23, Seahawks 17 (Long) #36256
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I watched it on replay — I thought it was purty obvious
    the Seahawks were flat in the first half — but they turned
    it on furiously in the second half.

    I felt the rams ‘earned’ the win with the Key, gutty,
    drive in the second half. The Rams offense just
    bullied the Seahawk Defense, with the game on the line
    and after the Seahawks had scored. They just bullied’em.
    The OLine, and Gurley and Cunningham…and Barnes.

    Once again, the Rams “seem” poised to make
    a playoff run…next year. Seems that way.
    Again.

    w
    v

    in reply to: win over Seattle, reactions from around the net #36251
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “douchecanoes” ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Let's talk about next year's Offensive Line #36214
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well I’m fine with it, except for
    GRob. He’s a big question mark to me.

    IF they dont draft a LT, I assume it means
    they believe in him.

    The OLine looks ok to me in general.
    They need a WR, TE, and QB.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Tweets 12/28 #36208
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Go Giants.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Horns pierce the Seahawks: Post-game thread #36204
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Does 8-8
    mean anything?

    The record stopped meaning anything after the Foles meltdown and the losing streak.

    But. WINS mean something.

    What do they mean? Well speaking only for myself, I like them.

    I am not willing to get into a drawn out herd-style debate about whether I should like them. If someone like invader doesn’t because 8-8 isn;t good enough, I will raise my glass to him and nod because I get that. It’s just not how I feel though.

    I like that the Rams were part of Upset Sunday this month. I like the fact that they took it to Seattle on the road. I like that they won in spite of not having Gaines, McDonald, Barron, Ogletree, and Quinn.

    So you forgot to ask the REAL question. The really important question.

    “What did this win mean to zn.”

    It meant a lot. It was fun. Thanks for asking.

    .

    Ok, but what song are you going to sing
    in the lifeboat?

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 9,511 through 9,540 (of 12,325 total)