Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 8,431 through 8,460 (of 12,960 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How Trump took Middle America #58652
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    see link….The link between economic anxiety and rightwing nationalism can be overdone. The easy narrative of a populist revolt has an appealing simplicity, but Clinton won votes from more than half of the people who earn less than $50,000; the rich voted for Trump. He won the electoral college and lost the popular vote. Thanks to the lowest turnout in 20 years, Trump won a lower percentage of the eligible vote than John Kerry, John McCain, Mitt Romney and Gerald Ford – and they all lost. He got the same proportion of the white vote as Romney in 2012 and Bush in 2004 and only a little more than McCain in 2008. He may have led the charge to the right but comparatively few marched with him.

    Nor is such a link inevitable. In several countries across Europe – from Greece to Britain – a populist left response has emerged to this same crisis. In the US Bernie Sanders….”

    …

    …People need something to change. “The [Democratic party says] ‘Let’s just do the things we’ve always done and have incremental change’.” says Dave Ring, who runs the Downtown Farm Stand, an organic food store and deli. “So they’re very, very happy with incremental change. And the rest of the public is out here like: ‘We don’t have time for incremental change.’”
    …
    …. “They understand the trade issue,” said Ring, who voted for Sanders in the primary and then Clinton. “People know what killed their jobs and that was Nafta. And not only did it kill our jobs here but it exploited people elsewhere, and I think people are starting to understand how multinational corporations work. They move the jobs where there’s people they can exploit.”….

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58614
    Avatar photowv
    Participant
    in reply to: Zizek on Trump #58607
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah, some of us have batted that meme around for a while. Mostly at the beginning of the Trump campaign, not so much near the end. The meme being that Killary and the Status Quo is so gawd-awful and such a continuing, mounting, threat to the biosphere and social-justice that hellz-bellz why not vote for the disgusting, revolting, narcissistic, lying,
    ‘brick through the window’ — at least it might ‘send a message’ that the system is hideous.

    The problem with that in my own view, is that Trump is not really a brick-through-the-window. He’s just another even worse ‘system’ guy. Sure he may have a less-evil economic policy on Trade agreements, but his policy will STILL be pro-corporate. And on every single other issue i can think of he will be worse than Killory. I mean…just look at his cabinet. Thats the key. Thats all you need to look at to see the future.

    Assange said “Hillary is Cholera and Trump is Gonorrhea”.
    I’d say Hillary is Cholera and Trump is the Black Plague.

    Two awful, awful, awful, awful choices were paraded in front of American voters.

    Of course there were third-party options. Good ones. No-one twisted any voters arm. They didnt have to vote for the Plague or Cholera. But they did.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58602
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Oh, and if these assholes actually pass a Muslim registry, I think we should ALL register and render it moot.

    There’s a big movement for that. If there’s a Muslim registry, non-Muslims should register. Choke the machine.

    There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet.

    ————-
    LoL.

    I’d like to see Mr Science Nittany type that.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58601
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <

    Then why do democrats still vote democrat? Or I suppose what is a democrat bent or philosophy?

    —————
    Probly the whole ‘lesser of two evils’ thing for a lot of dem-voters. They want a more ‘left’ leaning party than the Dems but they think voting for the Green party is a ‘wasted vote’.

    Its the same reason so many righties keep voting for the Reps. They want something different but think a third-party vote is a wasted vote.

    Both parties have a nice racket going.

    w
    v

    in reply to: wikileaks – neutral or biased? #58570
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, that’s the Horseshoe Theory playing out, it seems.

    I think it’s far more complicated than that…maybe a sphere versus a 2d political space.

    Moreover, I think a society realigns their “center”. The US was MUCH more the left in the 30s than in the 50s, for example. A lot of the critique of the Horseshoe Theory assume both a static left/right paradigm and a static societal norm for what constitutes the center. Neither of which has any basis in fact or practice.

    —————–

    Ha. I could put ‘Corporotism’ in the Lunatic Fringe section myself. I mean corporotism is destroying the entire biosphere. That seems a bit lunatic-fringy to me.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58568
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    You’re so right Zooey. And don’t get me started on those pantsuits. Holy Jesus.

    It was so damned transparent that every appearance was micro-targeted…as if she was dressed by an analytics algorithm. It was stunningly disingenuous.

    Bernie was Bernie. Same suit. So much so that Larry David made the joke that he only had one pair of underwear…and Bernie ran with it and said he bought a second pair.

    Trump was Trump. He oozed wealth. Now one can focus on oozed or wealth, but even as he donned that red cap, totally out of character, it was like that moment in My Cousin Vinny…”I wore this ridiculous thing…for you”

    Hillary? Every appearance was a combination Rorschach test and puzzle, “who is Hillary pandering to/trying to manipulate/trying to relate to only with clothes?”

    The critiques came across as misogynistic, but they weren’t.

    You’d never see Elizabeth Warren do that. You’d never see Tulsi Gabbard to that. You’d never see Nina Turner do that.

    There were PLENTY of strong Democratic Party women who wouldn’t have done anything remotely like this.

    ————

    Yeah, i agree.

    But will the Dem-Machine EVER allow a true progressive to be at the head of the Ticket?

    Whens the last time that happened? 1972? McGovern?

    w
    v

    in reply to: wikileaks – neutral or biased? #58563
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    That might be it, but it might be something else.

    It might be that the Obama Administration and Clinton by extension tried to create a facade of transparency and fairness when in reality, they were being horribly vindictive and persecutorial (meant it that way, not prosecutorial) with respect to whistleblowers.

    We saw a TREMENDOUS acceleration of Wikileaks action AFTER Clinton’s answers regarding what she thought should happen with Edward Snowden.

    There is NO WAY Wikileaks would have gone after the DNC or Bernie Sanders in the same way they went after Clinton.

    I think in large part this was a massive FUCK YOU to the huge hypocrisy of the Obama Administration and by extension, the Clintons.

    Clinton would have no problem jailing reporters and prosecuting intelligence officers who raise issues of constitutionality.

    I really don’t know if Assange gave a shit about the ramifications.

    But, ya know… it’s so much easier for the corporate media to call Assange a misogynist than to actually think about what Assange is and has done and where Clinton stands and where those intersections lie.

    I swear, we have the laziest fucking media.

    —————

    Up until a coupla weeks before the election i really knew zero about wikileaks or Assange.

    I’ve been trying to figure out what they/he are all about lately. I have found it almost impossible to find accurate, reliable, articles on the subject. Most of the articles look like they were written by the DNC/Clinton: “Assange is a russian agent; Assange is a Pedaphile! ; Assange is a Trump Supporter!; Assange is a RACIST!…”

    My tentative view as of today, is to take Assange’s own words seriously — he flat out said he focused on Hillary because she’s a dangerous warmonger (paraphrasing). He also said choosing between Clinton and Trump is like choosing between “Cholera and Gonorrhea”.
    He’s also had good things to say about bernie.

    I think he probably loathes Clinton more than Trump. I think he would have published info on Trump if he had any (though i dont know that for sure).
    I think the info he published on Clinton was true and accurate.
    I think in general wikileaks is a great source of info and a great resource for humans — but its also not some holy unbiased source that is above criticism. (there are many places on the net where you can be skewered for even ‘hinting’ that wikileaks or saint assange may have biases. I have been called a ‘Troll’ and a ‘crackpot’ for merely ‘wondering’ about Assange and his motives btw 🙂 )

    So many things played into the Trump win and the Hillary debacle. One of those things was the wikileaks. Clinton came across as exactly what the leftists around here had been saying she was for years.

    Whither the Democrat Party? Trump doesn’t have to be an 8 year president. It could be just 4. It depends on the DNC and the Dems. Who will win the battle for the soul of the Dem Party? The Multi-Natonal-Corpse and the Banks and the Corpse-Media will fight to the death to spin the narrative about Hillary’s loss. They’ll blame Bernie, the Russians, Wikileaks, Racists, Bigots, Ignorant-Masses, Stupid White Males — they’ll spin a narrative that blames everyone but ‘the corporate-system’. They will try to marginalize the far-left and they will try to rig another dem-election and put forth a nice safe “Joe Biden type”.
    Bizness as usual.

    We shall see how things play out over the next coupla years. Sigh. I think Trump is gonna be worse than a lot of us thought, mainly because he’s gonna delegate 90 percent of the decision-making to his anti-poor, anti-science, anti-compassion Cabinet. Its gonna be bad.
    But it doesnt have to be 8-year-bad. It can be 4-year-bad. Just my opin-yun.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58545
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Climate change: Learning to think like a geologist #58542
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    …

    But I have nothing else to add. I won’t change your mind–and you won’t change mine. We can agree on that.

    ———————–

    On that, we can all agree.

    w
    v
    ”Smile, breathe and go slowly.” ~Thich Nhat Hanh

    in reply to: A little Q & A with Thich Nhat Hanh #58541
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    There are different versions of Buddhism and my understanding is some versions deny the existence of a Soul and some versions include an ‘atman’ or soul.

    “…Buddhism stands unique in the history of human thought in denying the existence of a Soul, Self or Atman. According to the teachings of the Buddha, the idea of self is an imaginary, false belief which has no corresponding reality, and it produces harmful thoughts of ‘me’ and ‘mine’, selfish desire, craving, attachment, hatred, ill-will, conceit, pride, egoism, and other defilements, impurities and problems. It is the source of all troubles in the world from personal conflicts to wars between nations. In short, to this false view can be traced all the evil in the world…”
    —What the Buddha Taught by Walpola Rahula
    ————
    wiki

    …Ātman (Sanskrit: आत्मन्) or Atta (Pāli) is self. Occasionally the terms “soul” or “ego” are used. The words ātman and atta derive from the Indo-European root *ēt-men (breath) and are cognate with the Old English æthm and German Atem.[1]

    In Buddhism, the belief in the existence of an unchanging ātman is the prime consequence of ignorance, which is itself the cause of all misery and the foundation of saṃsāra. The early scriptures do, however, see an enlightened being as one whose changing, empirical self is highly developed.

    Some Mahāyāna Buddhist sutras and tantras present other Buddhist teachings with positive language by strongly insisting upon the ultimate reality of the atman when it is equated with each being’s “essential nature of mind” (Dalai Lama —- see relevant section below) or inborn potential to become, and future status as, a Buddha (Tathāgatagarbha doctrine).
    In contradistinction to early Buddhist teachings, the Theravāda Dhammakaya Movement of Thailand teaches the reality of a true self, which it equates with nirvana.

    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58540
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “… Trump’s voters were speaking a language that has been taboo in America for decades, if not forever.
    Nobody in this country knows how to talk about class.
    America is like a giant manor estate where the aristocrats don’t know they’re aristocrats and the peasants imagine themselves undiscovered millionaires. And America’s cultural elite, trained for so long to think in terms of artificial distinctions like Republicans and Democrats instead of more natural divisions like haves and have-nots, refused until it was too late to grasp the meaning of the rage-storm headed over the wall….

    Most of us smarty-pants analysts never thought Trump could win because we saw his run as a half-baked white-supremacist movement fueled by last-gasp, racist frustrations of America’s shrinking silent majority. Sure, Trump had enough jackbooted nut jobs and conspiracist stragglers under his wing to ruin the Republican Party…

    …Trump’s rebellion was born at the intersection of two toxic American myths, the post-racial society and the classless society.”

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think Goff will Scorch the league
    like a sausage in a refinery fire.

    …wait…my analogy might need some work.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Can the Goff Rams beat the Suh Dolphins? #58537
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well the Dolphins have won, what four in a row? As much as the football
    gods hate the Rams, they also hate the Dolphins. So, this one is tricky for the football gods. Do they let Goff and the Rams reach .500 this late in the year? Do they let the Dolphins win FIVE in a row and go two games over .500?

    The football gods are between a rock and a hard place.

    I predict an earthquake.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Anti-Trump protests ARE peaceful and organic. #58445
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    and that’s not to say there isn’t an element of racism among trump supporters. there is. it certainly plays a significant part. misogyny and homophobia. there’s that too.

    but i also don’t like how clinton minimized other issues and reduced it down to vote for us or side with racism and misogyny and homophobia.

    bernie would not have done that. i truly believe that.

    There was a great article during the primaries that was posted here that argued that Dems should nominate Sanders precisely because of this. Because against Hillary, Trump would go low, and she couldn’t leave the “Crooked Hillary” stuff alone, and would have to go low back at him, and that she would inevitably lose a mud-slinging contest. Whereas Sanders would have just kept banging away on wealth, health care, and college education. He would have no need to go to the gutter, and Trump would just look bad in contrast. That was the argument.

    ————-
    True, zooey.

    But i still am skeptical about the breezy view that Sanders “would have won”. Maybe.
    But i dunno. America does not seem like a nation that would elect a socialist to me.

    Granted, Bernie ran as an FDR progressive.

    I dunno. I think it woulda been REAL close.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Anti-Trump protests ARE peaceful and organic. #58444
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    and that’s not to say there isn’t an element of racism among trump supporters. there is.

    ————
    Theres an element of racism among SOME trump supporters. A FACTION of Trump supporters.
    Not ALL Trump supporters. We dont know what the percentages are.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58443
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    < “… it’s difficult to keep our animosities in check when discussing politics, but I had/have high hopes for this board in particular to do just that. So, going forward, I’ll try not to read ‘tone’ into the discussion, and I’ll do my best to elucidate in the same manner…”

    ——————–
    Well just to reiterate — itz REALLY-REALLY-REALLY-REALLY hard for people with
    vastly-disparate political views to ‘converse’ for Long. Oh, it usually starts out ok, but sooner or later…boom.

    For lots of obvious reasons.

    I mean think of…oh….say…abortion. Think of a message board with say ten pro-choicys and five pro-lifeys. And all fifteen have different levels of ‘communication skills’ and different kinds of ’emotional discipline’ and different temperaments, etc.

    How likely is it there will be ‘good conversation’ for an ‘extended period’ among ‘all’ of them? How long before the word ‘murder’ gets tossed around, and how soon before someone gets ugly which elicits more ugliness….and so on.

    Its a very very very tricky thing we are all trying to do here. It requires a lot of diplomatic-skills and listening skills and all kinds of disciplines. Imho.

    …i am glad you said you felt some folks were being ‘condescending’ — whether they were or not isnt the issue, the thing is, its important that people ‘hear that’. Etc.

    w
    v
    “When a problem is posed in a way that polarizes,
    the solution is often obscured before the search is under way”
    Deborah Tannen

    Do not remove a fly from your friend’s head with a hatchet.
    Chinese proverb

    We do not talk – we bludgeon one another with facts and theories gleaned
    from cursory readings of newspapers, magazines and digests. ”
    — Henry Miller

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58402
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I’m just gonna genuflect real quick and then find my way out. Because at this point, I can honestly see the benefit of surrounding yourself with like-minded people. It’s also nice to have hope and people like to think that they’re making good choices or that their opinions matter. This is just a constant reminder that I’m apparently a moron (and any number of “ists”). So, yeah. No thanks. And you know what the worst part is? Any of you could have seized the opportunity to teach me about your ideologies and use persuasion and tact to make me, at minimum, a sympathizer. Instead, laughs and condescension because … my opinions.

    “Okay, I laughed at this”
    “That’s a nonsensical statement.”

    Awesomesauce.

    ——————-

    Politix is really really really hard to discuss.

    Its ‘almost’ impossible for people with vastly-divergent views to talk
    together.

    Thats my conclusion from watching things play out for over a decade.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Alternatives to Neoliberal Failure #58322
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Black on black crime is ridiculously disproportionate to white on black crime.

    And white on white crime is ridiculously disproportionate to black on white crime.

    Cuz, by and large, they don’t live in the same neighborhoods.

    ————–

    And, what REALLY complicates things is some of the MOST hideous behavior imaginable — ie,Corporate Pollution, Toxic Waste, etc — is all perfectly LEGAL.

    So how do we define ‘crime’ exactly….etc.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58312
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    .. He might have even had a minute chance to flip my vote. To that end, all the people who are out there protesting, burning shit, and screaming and yelling about democracy, should be pissed at the DNC. Not the people who voted for Trump or even Trump himself. Their anger is misdirected, IMO.

    ————-
    Well everyone on this board
    loathes the DNC. On that we ALLLL agree.

    As for Trump, the leftists do indeed loathe him too.
    You should know the reasons by now, surely
    .

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Noam on Trump:https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/trump-in-the-white-house/

    Noam Chomsky: Before turning to this question, I think it is important to spend a few moments pondering just what happened on November 8, a date that might turn out to be one of the most important in human history, depending on how we react.

    No exaggeration.

    The most important news of November 8 was barely noted, a fact of some significance in itself.

    On November 8, the World Meteorological Organization delivered a report at the international conference on climate change in Morocco, COP22, which was called in order to carry forward the Paris agreements of COP21. The WMO reported that the past five years were the hottest on record. It reported rising sea levels, soon to increase as a result of the unexpectedly rapid melting of polar ice, most ominously the huge Antarctic glaciers. Already Arctic sea ice over the past five years is 28 percent below the average of the previous 29 years, not only raising sea levels but also reducing the cooling effect of polar ice reflection of solar rays, thereby accelerating the grim effects of global warming. The WMO reported further that temperatures are approaching dangerously close to the goal established by COP21, along with other dire reports and forecasts.

    Another event took place on November 8, which also may turn out to be of unusual historical significance for reasons that, once again, were barely noted.

    On November 8, the most powerful country in world history, which will set its stamp on what comes next, had an election. The outcome placed total control of the government – the executive, Congress, the Supreme Court – in the hands of the Republican Party, the most dangerous organization in world history.

    Apart from the last phrase, all of this is uncontroversial. The last phrase may seem outlandish, even outrageous. But is it? The facts suggest otherwise. The Party is dedicated to racing as rapidly as possible to destruction of organized human life. There is no historical precedent for such a stand.

    Is this an exaggeration? Consider what we have just been witnessing…see link
    …

    in reply to: thread closed…personal taunt #58303
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    You know when grown men are literally claiming it is the end to the world if Trump is elected, how can anyone in good conscience claim they are participating in “good conversation”. I wouldn’t blame me.

    ——————
    I understand you feel that way, but I feel the same way about things you and X and NM write about. But no matter how i ‘feel’ i try to be disciplined and not get ‘personal’ and i try not to ‘taunt’.

    I know its HARD not to get personal. Believe me. I know.

    Politics and Religion are REALLY tricky. We have to TRY hard not to get personal or this board will go the route of another Pol Board most of us remember. It imploded with insults and taunting and ugliness.

    Personal responsibility. Its a rightwing idea, right 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58302
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Whats more impressive and gratifying is all those majority “loozer” voters bunched up in a few blue states. Should Trump turn the economy around and turn MI, OH, WI and PA into reliable red states then that “majority” mass movement is something you will have to get used to.

    The demographics of the US are changing, and those demographics favor more liberal politics. And although you don’t want to believe it, Trump won only because he ran against the worst possible candidate the Democrats could have nominated. Either Biden or Sanders would have beat him going away.

    ————-
    I’m not so sure of that. I dunno if Biden or Bernie would have beaten him.

    Maybe.

    I sure would have loved to have seen a Trump vs Bernie election. That woulda been somethin ta see. An actual, real, choice.

    w
    v

    in reply to: thread closed…personal taunt #58298
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <b
    Time stamp shows you posted this 11 minutes AFTER my last post which had already addressed your concerns. Oh and I’m not X. I don’t want to be X. Nothing against X. X just isn’t me.

    ———–
    Oh, i didnt see your other post.

    But the issue for me is not whether BT is here or not. The issue is personal focused taunting. Just my opinion. I like a ‘nice board’. Some folks like more ‘ornery’ boards.
    Everyone has their own preference.

    You and i get along fine. You and BT brought a lot of ugliness to the board. Just seemed like an ugly dynamic to ME. I blame both of you 🙂

    This is an experiment — most boards cannot handle lefties and righties posting together. Its a VERY tricky thing. I’ve seen many-a-board implode due to lefties and righties getting ugly with one another. We all have to WANT ‘good conversation’ and we all have to figure out what that ‘is’ exactly.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Chargers to LA, apparently #58292
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I do NOT want them in Kronky-World. They belong in San Diego.

    The world has gone mad.

    w
    v

    in reply to: thread closed…personal taunt #58286
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Too close to home? Lots of similar stuff, actually far worse, posted about Trump supporters over the past 17 months and not a single call from me to delete anything.

    Posting vids and articles about Trump supporters is not the same as focusing on ONE poster.
    Which is what
    you did.

    Take a look at how X handled it.
    He just raised the issue in conversation. “Hey Trump supporters are not racist troglodytes…” And i agreed with him. Conversation. Not taunting.
    You and Billy got into personal clashes. Neither of you would stop. It got personal.

    Billy is taking a break from posting for a while btw.

    w
    v
    “Nobody who says, ‘I told you so’ has ever been, or will ever be, a hero.”
    — Ursula K. Le Guin

    in reply to: Dave Chappelle on SNL – Trump politics and other stuff #58284
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “Obama did a good job. We will all miss him…”

    Said another rich person who’s disconnected from the middle class.

    ———–
    Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary = Neoliberalism.

    All three are the same guy.

    I believe Trump will combine the worst of Neoliberalism and NeoCon-ism.

    (I know you disagree and want to give him a chance, etc. I dont need to ‘give him a chance’ because I have seen his appointees and i know what they want and I have read Trumps policy
    statements. So, i know what he wants to do. Its not a m
    ystery. He’s going to destroy the environment and cut taxes for the Rich, and turn the mega-corporations loose 🙂 )

    w
    v

    in reply to: Dave Chappelle on SNL – Trump politics and other stuff #58268
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Dave Chappelle on SNL – Trump politics and other stuff #58267
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “Obama did a good job. We will all miss him…”

    Um. No.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Alternatives to Neoliberal Failure #58260
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    There is no doubt that Trump voters are worse than average in attitudes towards non-white Americans, immigrants, and women.

    That’s nice. I’m a Trump voter, and so are many of my friends, associates and family. Including my mother and sister. We all have poor attitudes towards non-white Americans, immigrants, and women I guess. Never mind that a great many of the left’s voters are non-white, vote against Conservatism, and have an even worse than average attitude towards whites and non-whites alike. Black on black crime is ridiculously disproportionate to white on black crime. Black and Latino gangs killing their own and each other (not whites) daily, and in gross. And because Trump is a braggart perv, most of his supporters are also braggart pervs, it seems. That also means we’re all misogynists. Never mind the fact that Black women are almost three times as likely to experience death as a result of domestic and intimate partner violence than White women. And while Black women only make up 8% of the population, 22% of homicides that result from DV/IPV happen to Black Women and 29% of all victimized women, making it one of the leading causes of death for Black women ages 15 to 35. Statistically, they experience sexual assault and DV/IPV at disproportionate rates and have the highest rates of intra-racial violence against them than any other group. But the problem is white-american Trump supporters. They’re the perpetrators of hate, intolerance and misogyny. They’re the ones that impregnate multiple women and leave them with no support. They’re the ones who kill each other in Chicago to the tune of 3891 shot to date, and 689 of them fatally. Instead of condemning that, harshly, the left would rather court their vote with promises of hope and change while doing absolutely nothing to improve their situation.

    Having stealthily, assiduously cultivated and nurtured the most regressive, dim, and hateful elements in its Redneck Wing for decades, the CEO Wing gaped impotently as Dogpatch was appropriated by a vulgarian who spoke to peckerwoods directly, not in code. He jettisoned the few Silverspooners and Coupon Clipper Bosses, stole their ground troops and mobilized their outrage.

    And now we’re rednecks and peckerwoods if we live in middle America. And those are the only people (rednecks) who got Trump’s message about security, immigration reform, jobs, 2nd amendment rights, and sending unconstitutional S.C. decisions back to the States (aka, legal marijuana and abortion) where the people themselves can make those determinations. Nah. We’re just stupid, dim, regressive, and hateful in the red states. We’re just courted by all dem fansy and perdy werds. AIn’t need nuttin’ else.

    For generations, Americans have been dosed with the ultra-nationalist poison of Exceptionalism, with its implicit racist subtext, and its sexism buried in a hoo-rah masculinity cult

    Or, it seems, it’s manly-men overflowing with excess testosterone – the neanderthals of the Country – that are the plague. And because they’re manly-men, they’re also racists and sexists. A breed of devolved women hating, mexican haters. They probably hate mexican women more than anything else! Yikes! How do you leftists fix the Country in the face of that super gender? We’ll just kick the shit out of you if you try, and then we’ll rape your women and drive your Latino maids back across the boarder ourselves in our Ford F150’s. Watch your step, y’all. Y’aint’ know what y’all messin’ with.

    And of course, they answer it by bashing immigrants and people of colour, vilifying Muslims, and degrading women.

    Of course. That’s the only thing we know. We’re stupid.

    —————

    But how did you like the article? 🙂

    Seriously, i dont interpret it the way you do. I think there is a significant racist-faction among the coalition of factions that voted for Trump. Its ONE faction.

    I think the Clintonistas love to OVER-emphasize that one ugly faction.
    I think the Trumpites love to UNDER-estimate that one ugly faction.

    But aside from that (which im not really into) I AM interested in the TOPIC of “Neoliberalism”. The leftists around here have been batting that topic around LONG before Trump became the Rep nominee. I dont like the ‘word’ neoliberal, btw, because i think it confuses a lot of non-political-types.

    I think the writer is correct in stating that Trump didnt beat hillary so much as the NeoLib policies of BILL Clinton and Obama kilt Hillary.

    Just so you know and to emphasize — i dont agree (or disagree) with everything in an article just coz i post it. You are the same way, i believe.

    Also, I KNOW that there are PLENTY of Trump voters who are not racist, sexist, etc. I was arguing that back when Trump first got the Rep nomination.
    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 8,431 through 8,460 (of 12,960 total)