Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipantI was going to add more, but I got blocked out.
Not sure what you mean there? Blocked from where?
—————
Well the site blocked ‘me’ after I looked at three cartoons.(i only copied and pasted one) Not this site. The site at the link.w
vSeptember 20, 2016 at 2:09 pm in reply to: "if Fisher had his way Goff wouldn't play in 2016"… & other Fisher/Goff rumors #53418
wvParticipanti’ve seen the highlights. i’ve also read articles saying that defenses are daring him to throw.
————
Yeah, if the hi-lites are meant to show he can throw long, I dunno.
Only two of those passes were what “I” would call long bombs.
The rest were short passes and medium-long passes.I wont quibble about labels to describe his arm, but i would say
his arm is indeed a liability. He ‘can’ set himself if he has time
and with a lot of effort launch one, but in general, his arm is one of the weakest arms of the 32 starting QBs in the NFL. I mean, go down the list. Where does he rank?His arm is one of the reasons he’s a ‘placeholder’ imho.
Given his moxy, experience and other abilities, He’s the best they have today, though.
Sure wish he had more help in the receiving corps. A Larry Fitzgerald would help.
w
v
wvParticipantTo turn that around this team needs to beat a team like Tampa Bay this week. If they can’t, I’m not so sure they will turn things around this year. I’ll be getting a deja vu vibe. And I’d like to change that.
I don’t want to feel like Bill Murray:
————-
Well, so far the Tampa Defense has allowed this:“…Keenum should have a chance to thrive this week against Tampa Bay’s defense. In the first week, Atlanta’s Matt Ryan passed for 334 yards and two touchdowns. On Sunday, Arizona’s Carson Palmer passed for 308 yards and three touchdowns. Neither quarterback threw an interception.”
Seems like even Bill Murray could pass on this defense.
w
v

wvParticipantSo I call that the QB/OL syndrome, in honor of The China Syndrome, and see that as the primary cause. I routinely ask if anyone can think of teams that played well under that combined set of conditions and I have never gotten an answer, in any of the 24 corners of rams-online-nation.
————–
Well, I’d say 90 percent of average football fans dont follow other teams enough to know anything about their OLines. So, it has never meant much to me that no answers are forthcoming to that question.
Having said that, i dont disagree with the thrust of your post.
Still, I’m open the notion there may be more to it, than the injuries. I dunno. I’m just wondering if Fisher will do anything different to motivate them this week.
wvParticipantI’ll begin to believe if they can win 3 in a row.
————-
Man, three in a row would be a spectacle wouldn’t it.
Remember when three in a row would be a Yawn, around here?
Remember when they could actually convert a third and five ?
w
v
wvParticipanthttp://www.tampabay.com/sports/football/bucs/fennelly-as-crucial-stretch-approaches-we-wonder-which-are-the-real-bucs/2294253
…
Back to Arizona.What, you really expected the Bucs to beat the Cardinals?
On the road, against a veteran team with better players?
Forget it.
Granted, it would have been nice not to have lost by 33 …
But losing Sunday to the Rams, now that would be a disaster.
The Rams will be flying across the country, like the Bucs did, and can’t possibly bring the energy they did against hated Seattle in that first game back in L.A in front of 91,000. The Rams have a good defense, especially against the run. They also have scored just three field goals in two games.
Games like this, against the teams the Bucs can beat (and that can beat the Bucs), are more important indicators of whether these Bucs are developing more than any trip to Arizona.
Translation: You don’t lose this game.
Not if you’re serious about this season.
Win it and it will be time for 2-1 crazy.
And the Broncos will look beatable.
But that’s next Monday.
Or is it?
wvParticipantNot all that likely.
But if he wins Pennsylvania, then he really could do it.—–
Seems to have gotten close again, so sure he could win. So, i should probly stop calling him ‘toast.’
But most polls still show him behind, so, yes, its still ‘unlikely’
he will win.w
v
wvParticipantDoug Martin is hurting, i see:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000704775/article/doug-martin-hurts-hamstring-in-bucs-blowout-lossw
v
wvParticipantIt will be Tavon, next week, on a short pass.
w
vSeptember 19, 2016 at 11:30 am in reply to: No such thing as an exclusively herbivorous animal… #53318
wvParticipantI dont think nature should do things like that.
Nature should be a vegetarian.
Nature should be nice.
w
v
wvParticipantRobert has not forgotten, i see. He knows it will cost him a lot of money from the corporate-sponsers. Interesting.
“….EXTRA POINTS
For the second week in a row, defensive end Robert Quinn raised his right fist during the pregame national anthem – part of the movement that 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick has sparked to protest the oppression of black Americans and other people of color. However, he was not joined this time by receiver Kenny Britt, who had also raised his fist during the season opener. ”—————-
w
v
wvParticipantI think most of what happened had to do with SEATTLE more than it did the Rams. I get the feeling Seattle may not score any points the rest of the month. Every defense is gonna look great against them for a while.
So, great win and all, but I dunno what the rams are yet.
For me, the Tampa game is very big. Will the offense improve? Can the Defense be consistently good? Are they ever gonna break out of “7-9 bullshit mode” ?
w
v
wvParticipantThe offense is still terrible. 2 games, haven’t scored a TD.
An ugly win, but a win monetheless. And I’ll take any win over Seattle.9 penalties for 78 yards. No running game.
Still looks like some 7-9 bullshit to me.————
There is some room for improvement on offense 🙂
w
v
wvParticipantRams are in first place.
w
v
wvParticipant<And, of course, their go to scold/scapegoat move is “Nader gave us Bush!!” Um, no he didn’t. It’s physically and logically impossible for a third party candidate in one state to do that, not to mention the fact that 308,000 Democrats voted for Bush in Florida. And I tell them this. And I also tell them you’re not going to get people to switch if you blame them for all the evils of the world, etc. Expecting them to ignore that tongue lashing you just gave them isn’t very realistic.
They don’t listen.—————
Thats a lot of Dems voting for Bush. I didn’t realize that many Dems had gone Rep.Anyway, I am smiling thinking of you posting on Democrat sites. I could never do it. My head would explode. Or worse, it wouldn’t explode and I’d have to suffer longer.
w
v
wvParticipantWell I’ll tell ya, this trait you are talking about — ie, “ability to be effective behind a bad OLine” — that is a damn important and rare trait.
I’d say any QB that can do THAT is at least ‘near-elite’. Ya know.
I mean that is a helluva trait.Other than the ability to play well in the clutch or in the redzone,
I cant think of a more important trait.w
v
wvParticipant<Hell, 20% of his supporters in South Carolina said Lincoln never should have freed the slaves, and a much higher percentage said the South should have won — which is defacto support for slavery…
————-
Well, i hadn’t seen that survey (and of course Trumpists will deny its validity), but it doesn’t surprise me.Having said that, I bet you could find 20 percent of Clinton voters believe in some pretty batshit-crazy stuff. Religion, etc.
We are trapped on Earth, comrad. Itz a madhouse 🙂
PS – I’m also always ‘wondering’ about ‘strategy’. Like, for example, I personally would like to burn an amerikan flag (and almost every other national flag) every day 🙂 But i dont because its bad strategy. Just alienates the masses. I also wonder about calling out Trumpists as ‘ignorant racists’ etc, etc, and so forth. I dont know that that is good strategy 🙂 So, i tend to resist it, or go in another direction. Even though, yes, its true, that a big loud faction of Trumpists are the worst kind of david-duke racists.
w
vSeptember 17, 2016 at 4:13 pm in reply to: Informal poll… will the Rams rebound against Seattle? #53175
wvParticipantMy heart (and history) sez, they bounce back,
but my head sez they got real problems:Rams 6
Seahawks 17But what do i know.
w
v
wvParticipantSo who are you voting for NMR ?
w
v
wvParticipantThat’s racist in itself.
The media, on behalf of the Democrats, are pulling out all the stops on this one.———-
My own view is, i prettymuch tune-out anyone that says
“Trump voters are..xyz”I mean, theres millions of voters in the Trump camp. Ya definitely
have yer confederate-flag-loving-racist types. You have to try very hard
to NOT see that faction. Its a big, loud, faction, and its in the Trump camp.But its only one faction of the Trump camp. There’s plenty of others.
So, I dont think Krugman was very thorough in his analysis.
What i see is….a lot of Trump voters wont admit that the Trump camp has a big racist-faction. They dont want to see it, or simply wont admit to it.
But I also think its hard for the clinton voters to see that theres big factions in the Trump camp that are NOT part of the big racist faction. There’s plenty of voters who just think of him as an ‘outsider’ and a ross perot type, etc.
Just my opinion.
I still think Clinton is going to win, but apparently its close again, now.
Anyway, whichever of the two evil-candidates wins, I’m going to think its a total disaster for all life on the Planet.
w
vSeptember 17, 2016 at 3:46 pm in reply to: Trees are intelligent, have emotions and tree friends #53170
wvParticipantI wonder how trees feel about being split and stacked for firewood.
————
They want reparations.
w
v
wvParticipantSo are you on the Wilson bandwagon now? There was a time you did not think he was ‘elite’ — but if you are putting him in the same category as Brady, does that mean you have elevated him?
w
v
wvParticipantI agree with everything Zooey wrote.
The racial disparities in the criminal justice system are too stark and clear to deny, really. If you are not familiar with the stats, prepare yourself for some startling numbers.
I mean, they show an appalling race/poverty issue. The stats just go on and on and on. Arrests, convictions, sentencing, probation, you name it…whatever part of the system you look at you get….well, see below :
“….Many of the factors contributing to this inequality can be attributed to the system instead of to different behavior between blacks and whites.
Nothing illustrates the difference between justice for the races than the war on drugs. Whites and blacks use drugs at roughly the same rate – there isn’t a statistically significant difference, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Black people, however, are arrested for drug use at a much higher rate. At the disparities’ peak in the late 1980s and early 1990s, blacks were five times more likely to be arrested for drugs than whites were…..”
—–
“…according to research from The Sentencing Project. The ACLU also found authorization to seek the death penalty was more likely when there was at least one white victim in the case…”…
—–
“…SWAT teams are most often deployed for drug searches, an arrest category that targets people of color…”
——
“…In many U.S. counties, Ferguson included, police officers serving the citizens are mostly white, while residents of the county are mostly people of color, according to The Washington Post…”http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2014/12/11/no-justice-is-not-colorblind
=======“…Police are three times as likely to search the cars of stopped black drivers than stopped white drivers, as the chart below, based on data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, illustrates. Nationally, black drivers are also more likely to be pulled over and less likely to receive a reason for being stopped. In one Rhode Island study, black drivers were stopped more even though they were less likely to receive a citation…”
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2015/08/racial_disparities_in_the_criminal_justice_system_eight_charts_illustrating.html
————–“…A 2014 study in New York City showed that blacks were more likely than whites or nonblack minorities to be in jail while they await trial, even after controlling for the seriousness of charges and prior record. Other research suggests that this disparity is often due to the fact that black defendants cannot afford to pay bail. The temporary incarceration stigmatizes the defendant, disrupts family life and employment, and makes it harder for the defendant to prepare a defense. In the chart below, “jail” refers to defendants who were offered bail but could not post it; “remanded” refers to defendants who were not given the option of posting bail…”
————d”…The same study in New York found that black defendants are more likely to be offered plea deals that include prison time than whites or nonblack minorities. Even after controlling for many factors, including the seriousness of charges and prior record, blacks were 13 percent more likely than whites to be offered such deals..”
——–“…Researchers found that North Carolina prosecutors were excluding black people from juries in capital cases at twice the rate of other jurors, even when controlling for legitimate justifications for striking jurors, such as employment status or reservations about the death penalty. Other studies have shown that excluding black people from juries can influence deliberations and verdicts. For example, black defendants in capital cases with white victims are less likely to receive a death sentence if there is a black juror….”
———-
“…2012 working paper found “robust evidence” that black male federal defendants were given longer sentences than comparable whites. Black men’s sentences were, on average, 10 percent longer than those of their white peers. This is partly explained by the fact that prosecutors are about twice as likely to file charges against blacks that carry mandatory minimum sentences than against whites..”
———-
“….Black convicts have their probation revoked more often than whites and other minorities, according to a recent study of probation outcomes in Iowa, New York, Oregon, and Texas. These racial disparities held even when the study controlled for other characteristics of the probationers, such as their age, crime severity, and criminal history. In the chart below, the “unexplained” portion of each bar is the level of racial disparity that could not be explained by nonracial characteristics….”============================
It just goes on and on. I could post stats for an hour.
w
v-
This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipant38 million people in California. I don’t think it’s a stretch to think 3% of them are Ram fans.
————–
That was before the 49er game.
Now, there are about 127 Ram fans,
across the country. The diehards. They dont know any better.w
v
wvParticipantI’m not the least bit concerned about Goff. I saw enough in preseason to be fine with that pick.
I dont like to talk about fans (posters) much, but lets just say
many of them often rush to judgment about all kinds of things.1/16th of the season is gone. 15/16ths to go.
w
vSeptember 16, 2016 at 12:42 pm in reply to: Trees are intelligent, have emotions and tree friends #53080
wvParticipantExcellent questions raised by that article.
w
v
wvParticipantWhat? You mean you think Keenum really didn’t mean he was seeing actual ghosts? Based on what? We have his direct quote.
To you sir I say balderdash and poppycock.
—————-
Yeah, just because zn doesn’t believe in ghosts, doesn’t mean
Keenum didn’t see one, floating around in the intermediate zones.
Frankly, if you look closely at the highlight vid — the one where Keenum is getting buried by pass rushers — way off to the side, almost out of the screen…if you look close…you can see a green monkey. Glaring. And laughing.w
vSeptember 15, 2016 at 4:39 pm in reply to: Keyshawn Johnson: "Fisher was forced to draft Goff" #53015
wvParticipantI believe Goff was an LA marketing decision, not a football decision. Others are free to believe different.
—————
Really? You think a coach on the hot-seat, who has already been burned by an owner forcing a QB on him would take a rookie QB just for marketing reasons?
I dont see Fisher or Kronky that way, myself. And…for starters, this idea that Goff is some sort of ‘golden boy’ and Wentz is a ‘farm boy’ thing, doesn’t resonate with me. I mean, I’ve watched Goff on the interview vids and he strikes me as about as bland as they come. Wentz actually seems more lively to me.
At any rate, what about all the experts that evaluated Goff and the other QBs and concluded Goff was the special one ? They had no reason to be influenced by ‘marketing’.
I just think Fisher saw something special in Goff. Ya know. Like with Brian Quick 🙂
w
v
wvParticipantThat calls for the uncola.
——————-
Damn. I’d never seen that before. Cool.
…i was not expecting ‘hippie stuff’ from you, bnw. Good work.
I may have to reevaluate and revisit my mental-picture of what you look like
w
v -
This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts


