Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 4,381 through 4,410 (of 12,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bernie can Win, Bernie Cant win… #111496
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    David Frum (who hates Trump) thinks Bernie is weak with Black Voters.

    I dunno. Could be, but thats easily solved — Pick a Black VP.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Feathers are Flying #111492
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The last question. Even Fox news noticed:

    started at the 8 min mark:

    in reply to: Feathers are Flying #111491
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The last question of the debate…On the minor, trivial question of democracy.

    (this is why, I cant watch the Democrats, btw. Cant…even…watch em. Bernie’s the only one with the slightest bit of integrity)

    in reply to: Bloomberg #111487
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Fox view of the corrupt disgusting revolting Bloomberg:

    in reply to: Next Round of Political Compass bingo #111469
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I just wanna know where Lassie falls on that political-cube.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Compare and contrast: Heath Ledger vs J.Phoenix #111329
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah, great movie.

    On a related note, I find myself rooting for psychopathic killers in movies most of the time. They usually have that underdog thing going for them (they are typically born of some childhood trauma, then chewed up, swallowed, and vomited up by society), and who doesn’t root for an underdog.

    =============================

    Yeah, I’m not sure Jared Goff is psychopathic enough. His body language, sometimes seems almost neuro-typical at times.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The establishment is terrified of Bernie as we knew they would be.

    Good lord, they’ve even wheeled out panic-stricken James Carville. …and who the fuck is Michael Bennett?

    in reply to: Small farms vs big co-ops #111291
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Interesting. He mentions the desire of many people to return agriculture to the era of the small “family-owned” farm. They think this is more sustainable. It isn’t. Not from a financial standpoint as the author of this article points out and not from an environmental standpoint either.

    Actually, 98% of farms, large and small, are already family owned. But the preponderance of family-owned farms is relatively recent. Prior to the middle part of the 20th century most farmland was leased by the farmer from a landowner who was not only paid rent, but also took a share of the profits from whatever crops the land yielded. Very few farmers owned their own land. They lived and died in poverty. Returning to the innocent and wholesome farming practices of yesteryear would mean creating a giant underclass of impoverished sharecroppers and tenant farmers.

    =====================

    Yeah, well I ‘know’ what YOU, want Mr Science. You want GIGANTIC Orchards of Genetically Modified Asparagus. Asparagus the size of RedWoods. And…walking Meats. Giant Corporate-Grown Bacon Strips. All across the land. Giant-Meat grown from Test Tubes. And Robots. Meat-Robots.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Richardson on DOJ, Pentagon CFO, and NH Primary #111280
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “…New Hampshire primary showed something very interesting. Progressive candidates Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren won 35% of the vote in New Hampshire, while the moderates—Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar, and Joe Biden– won 53% of the vote…”
    =========================

    I know one thing. Corporate-Centrists will NEVER believe a Progressive can win until one actually…wins. If Bernie does actually manage, somehow, to win, Centrists will never be able to simply dismiss progressives again.

    Been a long long time. All the way Back to F.D.R.

    Is it finally time?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Krystal Ball on Fox being friendlier than MSNBC #111270
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    .
    there’s nothing extreme about Trump’s views from a GOP perspective. He wants the same things they all want – deregulation, tax breaks for the rich, elimination of social programs…He’s just more brazen about it.

    =====================

    True, but its not the whole story is it. I mean if you ask TRUMP SUPPORTERS, about how THEY experience him, they will often say he is Anti-Establishment. He’s played that card masterfully. He blew up all his Rep Opponents with that tactic.

    So while leftists like us, might see him as just a Super-Rep, THEY see him as an ANTI-establishment-REP.

    w
    v

    Right. But that’s because they see the establishment as professors who know things, and come to conclusions that require them to adjust.

    ==============

    True, there’s plenty of toxic anti-intellectualism out there. But…there’s also some valid-anti-intellectualism too, right? The intellectuals and the establishment wanted to foist Hillary/Obama/Bill-Clinton on the peepulz. So…itz all twisted and fucked up.

    I’m watchin Joker on dvd, right now, btw. I’ve seen about 40 minutes so far.
    Damn fine, visually. Great physical-acting by Joaquin. …he’s no Cesar Romero though 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: Sanders on FOX #111276
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    WV,

    My earlier reply to you was delayed in the spam queue. Hope you’ve noticed it by now, above.

    ___

    Anyway . . . we’ve been through this before, and sorry to rehash it, but you and I don’t see the MSM in the same way. I think on most stuff, we’re on the same page. On the same page with pretty much all the important stuff. But I don’t view the MSM as the Dem-establishment at all, if I’m reading you correctly and you do see it that way (?)

    Again, tough to express this in a short form. But, if the two parties were given points for bad behavior, and for stuff that real journalists should be exposing, they’d both get a ton. But the GOP would get ten times more points. So when the MSM try their damndest to be “fair and balanced,” they’re actually going a lot easier on the GOP than the Dems. They’re skewing reality. It’s not, in fact, the Dem-establishment. It’s tougher on them than on the GOP (in relative terms), given what each party actually does. That “liberal bias” the right always screams about is nonsense, in my view. They have a conservative bias, and always have. It’s just that conservatives give them a hell of a lot more ammunition via wrong-doing, so they have to cover that stuff more. The Dems give them fewer examples, but they struggle to try to “balance” it all, plus conflict and horse races sell. Lopsided, but truthful description of reality doesn’t.

    Not to mention, as I’ve brought up before, networks like CNN and MSNBC are crawling with conservatives, Republicans, Republican operatives, and ex-Republicans, and when they book folks for the Sunday shows, they tend to book more Republicans than Dems.

    Also, the media are owned by, as you know, conservative corporations. They prefer the Republicans to the Dems, cuz they get better deals from them. They get really good deals from the Dems, too. But they get great deals from the Republicans.

    IMO, the MSM is not the Dem-establishment, or the DNC-establishment. However, Fox and most baldly partisan right-wing media are openly, without apology, arms of the GOP.

    That’s the way I see it, anyway.

    I still detest both parties. But I see the GOP as a far bigger existential threat, especially to the planet.

    ==================

    Well, what is your opinion of, say, three specific organizations — lets say, MSNBC, The NYT, and NPR/PBS — Dont you think they are DEM-oriented? Corporate-Dem-oriented. I mean the NYT just flat out endorses Dems for President every four years.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Sanders on FOX #111265
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think that FOX gives the Left a bit more room to explain itself than MSNBC and CNN do….

    The right, though, can’t really see the difference. Hillary Clinton is a godless communist, and….

    =======================

    Here’s a question, I’d like to ask Tucker Carlson. He sees that the Dem-Establishment (CNN, Networks, NYTimes, MSNBC, DNC) are smearing/ignoring Bernie and promoting/cheerleading ‘the great centrist hope’ (whoever it might be).

    So Tucker (and a lot of other righties) SEE that. The comment on it a lot.

    But in their rightwing minds what do they think the REASON for that is?
    I mean if they think everyone on the left is a commie, then why would the establishment be against Bernie? He’s just another commie, in a sea of commies.

    The righties never really flesh out WHY they think the MSM-Dems hate Bernie.

    Of course if they were to say/see that the Dem-MSM hates Bernie because he is far-left and Biden-Klobochex are really pro-corporate-capitalists….well, that would go against their general-election-mantras that “Hillary/Biden are wacko far left commies…”

    w
    v

    in reply to: Sanders on FOX #111259
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    On Tucker Carlson:

    We shouldn’t forget that he’s been raging at “the left” for decades, and that he’s a pathological liar when it comes to the subject. He openly despises and demonizes “socialism” and “progressives” at every turn, and when he does have a leftist on air, he trashes them and gives them his patented “WTF” look every other second.

    He is not our friend.

    The only reason he’s saying anything positive about Sanders right now is that he sees the chance to sow division on the left in general, and among Dems in particular. No one should fall for this nonsense — including K Ball, who should know better. .

    ====================

    True, he is a Vile Repugnant. Absolutely. Its always a ‘given’ for me, BT. Dont think because i post his vids, i dont see all that. Its…a…given.

    But. I think he Genuinely does believe some of the things he says. Sometimes he just says what he really, actually thinks. And i think he genuinely thinks the DNC-establishment (CNN, MSNBC, NYTimes, etc) is smearing/ignoring Bernie.
    A rightwinger ‘can’ see all that. They are still rightwingers but they can sometimes see what the DNC is doing, clearly. Heck, I think a LOT of Foxers see it, clearly.

    As for K.Ball falling for something — what did she fall for? She went on Fox because she wanted to influence the VIEWERS. Millions of Viewers. At least thats what she said on her show. Makes sense to me. And the fact she was received more warmly on Fox than on CNN or MSNBC is not surprising. And that was her experience.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Krystal Ball on Fox being friendlier than MSNBC #111258
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    .
    there’s nothing extreme about Trump’s views from a GOP perspective. He wants the same things they all want – deregulation, tax breaks for the rich, elimination of social programs…He’s just more brazen about it.

    =====================

    True, but its not the whole story is it. I mean if you ask TRUMP SUPPORTERS, about how THEY experience him, they will often say he is Anti-Establishment. He’s played that card masterfully. He blew up all his Rep Opponents with that tactic.

    So while leftists like us, might see him as just a Super-Rep, THEY see him as an ANTI-establishment-REP.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Krystal Ball on Fox being friendlier than MSNBC #111244
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    In short, I don’t think they should ever be paired as “anti-establishment” rebels. Not ever. Nunca Jamas!!

    ===============

    Well, we could quibble about whether Trump is really anti-establishment, but that would require fine-tuning and defining the term.

    The thing is, its the ‘perception’. He’s ‘perceived’ as anti-establishment by the tea-party-types, and the evangelicals and the organized-racists. Thats a LOT of voters, who see him as anti-establishment.

    We leftists are a small small small minority. WE see him as Super-Turbo-Charged-Establishment. But we dont count for much, BT.

    The ‘perception’ among most voters is that Trump and Bernie are anti-establishment. It matters because Bernie can cash in on that, perhaps. Some rightwingers might switch over to Bernie. Cause of that perception.

    w
    v

    in reply to: New Hampshire – Bernie wins #111243
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    This is a real dynamic now. Playing out. “I voted for Bernie because MSNBC smears him”

    Wonder how the MSM is gonna deal with this?

    in reply to: New Hampshire – Bernie wins #111241
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yang quits the race.

    in reply to: New Hampshire – Bernie wins #111240
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    O Lord. This could make you vomit. Listen to Chris Matthews. Omg.
    Bernie “is not happy, not joyous,” but Klobachex “finds a way to care about problems in a positive, empathetic way…”

    Klobachex is the NYTimes candidate — the new corporate-centrists great hope at this point.

    What a corporate-country.

    in reply to: Sanders on FOX #111234
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Buttichex #111233
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Sanders on FOX #111225
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    But the Dems in the media keep telling us that they (the Dems) have to “appeal to the center,” and they have to “reach across the aisle,” and they have to “attract Republican voters” in order to win, even though their own base is larger than the GOP’s. A good bit larger…..

    So . . .

    ==================================

    Well, if they do want to attract some Reps — which can do that the best? A centrist like Biden? Or an anti-establishment type who is hated by the MSM, like Bernie?

    There’s several different factions of Reps. I’d say Bernie had a better chance of peeling away the Reps that are wavering.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Sanders on FOX #111220
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, but Fox isnt ‘only’ pushing the meme that Sanders is a scary commie. They WILL run will with that IF he is the nominee. But Fox is doin somethin else right NOW. Somethin more subtle. They are giving Bernie some love. They are attacking the Dem-Media for cheating, and lying, and ignoring Bernie. FOX is actually giving bernie more love than the corporate-DEM-press.

    There is always a reason. In this case its because Sanders is the ONE democratic candidate that Trump does not fear. In my case this election is not about progressives, moderates, corporate class, liberals, conservatives, etc. Its about TRUMP. That’s it. End of story for me.

    =================

    Ive thought of that, and I think there’s some truth to it, but there’s more to it than that. Some of the Foxers actually do sympathize with Bernie because of the way the DNC-dominated-mainstream-Dem-Media has smeared him. And the Foxies know that their BASE doesn’t like the way the DNC-dominated-mainstream-Dem-Media has treated Bernie. One thing the Rightwing base hates EVEN MORE than ‘socialists’ is — the Establishment. The Deep-State. The Dem-MSM.

    Its trickier than just “Fox wants Bernie to win”. Thats part of it, perhaps, but there’s more to it.

    My thing is — I dont care if Fox thinks Bernie would be the easiest candidate to beat. They might be Wrong. They are wrong about a LOT of things.

    I keep going back to Joe Rogan. Joe Rogan switched from supporting a rightwing libertarian (last election)to now “probly voting for Bernie.”
    What if he represents a sliver of libertarian-types who would vote for Bernie?

    w
    v

    in reply to: “do not knock Montana out – we dont wanna face SY #111213
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Btw, the sports-media-celebs are pushing the idea that Tom Brady will/should go to the Los Angeles Chargers. I mean this idea is being pushed NONSTOP on the sports shows.

    It almost seems like the NFL/Suits sent a memo to everyone — “we need to drum up more support for the LA Chargers in this new stadium…push the meme that Tom Brady is coming to LA….”

    w
    v

    in reply to: Sanders on FOX #111197
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    What do you guys think of this strategy, which I’ve mentioned before, and never see anyone do in public: When media try to demonize “democratic socialism,” I think Sanders and others should push back list some key socialists: MLK, Gandhi, Einstein, Orwell, Camus, Helen Keller, Dorothy Day, Upton Sinclair, the Dalai Lama and Bertrand Russell, for starters. Orwell, in fact, prefaced his Animal Farm with his advocacy of “democratic socialism” (which the CIA initially removed/censored).

    To me, it’s logical, if folks see socialists as scary, to mention great humanitarians, civil rights leaders, philosophers, scientists, etc. etc. who were/are socialists.

    Thoughts?

    =================

    I dunno, comrad. I dunno. I’m not sure Joe and Jane American care or know about Camus, Russell, Orwell, etc.

    For So many decades now the corporate-powers-that-be have SUCCESSFULLY demonized Socialism that its a fucking miracle Bernie has gotten as far as he has.
    Figuring out the right strategy for getting another five or ten percent of the public to buy into it….is the conundrum. I got no answers. I got nuthin.
    How in the hell does one overcome all that propaganda. Decades and Decades of propaganda. Fruited Plains of Propaganda. Purple Mountain Majesties of it. Amber Waves of it. Shining Seas of it. Spacious Skies…. 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: Oscar winners, 2020 #111195
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I havent seen Joker yet either. I’ll see it at some point.

    I figured Parasite would never make it to WV, so i bought a used dvd on the evil-amazon. Lookin forward to seein it. I’m gonna avoid the spoilers till then.

    In the vid i posted on writers and film, Joe Abercrombie alludes to the fact that the best story telling seems to be done on the small screen these days as opposed to the Big Budget Theater releases. Parasite is an exception that, i spose.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Oscar winners, 2020 #111187
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The director dealing with the hollywood idiocracy

    in reply to: Rush Limbaugh #111186
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Amen, comrads. Let us hate them together, in harmony.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Oscar winners, 2020 #111180
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Didnt realize this was the guy that did “Snowpiercer” which is one of my favorite films.

    And Geez, i havent seen reviews like this in a while:

    “….On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 99% based on 393 reviews, with an average rating of 9.38/10. The website’s critical consensus reads: “An urgent, brilliantly layered look at timely social themes, Parasite finds writer-director Bong Joon Ho in near-total command of his craft.”[54] On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 96 out of 100 based on reviews from 52 critics, indicating “universal acclaim”.[55]

    Writing for the New York Times, A.O. Scott described the film as “wildly entertaining, the kind of smart, generous, aesthetically-energized movie that obliterates the tired distinctions between art films and popcorn movies.”[56] Bilge Ebiri of NY Mag wrote that Parasite is “a work that is itself in a state of constant, agitated transformation—a nerve-racking masterpiece whose spell lingers long after its haunting final image.”[57] In his five-star review of the film, Dave Calhoun of Time Out praised the social commentary and stated that “This is a dazzling work, surprising and fully gripping from beginning to end, full of big bangs and small wonders.”[58] Variety’s Jessica Kiang described the film as “a wild, wild ride,” writing that “Bong is back and on brilliant form, but he is unmistakably, roaringly furious, and it registers because the target is so deserving, so enormous, so 2019: Parasite is a tick fat with the bitter blood of class rage.”… wikipedia

    —————

    in reply to: XFL — new rules include double passes #111179
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I watched a hi-lite vid. One thing that I completely agree with Peter King about — they cannot play in MetLife stadium. Or any cavernous stadium if they are only gonna have 20 thousand fans at the stadium. Play in small stadiums they can fill. Nothing wrong with that. Start slow. It just looked AWFUL to see them playing in a 90-percent-empty stadium. Terrible. Stupid. Beyond stupid.

    in reply to: Hiddan Biases Against Vegans #111171
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Hunh. I was unaware anyone cared very much about this…

    ==================

    You have no idea.

    Even the Great Jordan Peterson smears Kale so much that the Vegan-o-sphere has to respond in force. Goji-man.

Viewing 30 posts - 4,381 through 4,410 (of 12,326 total)