Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
InvaderRamModeratorat this point it seems like the rams are that close to getting goff. i’m torn.
i’m not so sure i’m sold on cook. if they can’t get goff, i’d rather they wait until the second round and get someone like wentz.
InvaderRamModeratori agree with those who say the rams need a qb. so it isn’t necessarily a matter of time but a matter of if they can find a qb. if they can find a qb it could be next year. if they can’t it’ll be never. and they just need a competent qb. they don’t need a great one.
InvaderRamModeratorwe’re in rooting for losses territory now.
oh man. this is so depressing.
Its worse than you think — we ‘also’ have to
root for the 3-win teams to Win — which means…
rooting for Dallas.w
voh dear. and the 2 teams that have serious qb needs among those three teams are the browns.
and the niners….
InvaderRamModeratorgeez. i thought that foles could be at least adequate. mediocre. he doesn’t even seem to be that.
InvaderRamModeratori haven’t seen the game yet but will try and watch it sometime this week. it will be painful i’m sure.
i did see that foles threw an int for td again.
InvaderRamModeratorwe’re in rooting for losses territory now.
oh man. this is so depressing. instead of thinking playoffs i’m now looking at mock drafts again.
and todd gurley has been shut down for the third game in a row now. i would at least like to see todd gurley finish the season strong. please just give me that. and the losses won’t hurt as much.
i don’t want receivers. i think the rams have decent receivers. i’d like a freaking quarterback.
InvaderRamModeratorhappy birthday! aren’t you having the best birthday!?
InvaderRamModeratori hope he’s ok. i hope they’re all ok.
InvaderRamModeratori’d give him one more year. that’s it.
Sure, but if a stud LT falls to them in the draft
do you take him?w
vbased on how he looks like now i would say yes. but hopefully this isn’t how he looks at the end of the year.
i also think it depends on who’s available. like if a stud wr or a stud qb or was available.
November 24, 2015 at 5:57 pm in reply to: Wagoner: Blame for Rams' abysmal offense starts with Fisher #34656
InvaderRamModeratoryoungest offensive line. first year coordinator. new quarterback. not a recipe for success. how much of that was out of the rams control?
i don’t know but at least part of the reasoning for a first year coordinator was continuity. bringing in a new coordinator with a whole new system. would that have made things better?
could they have brought in some veteran linemen? would they have been better than havenstein? would that have offset the avalanche of injuries that buried this offense?
what a calamity.
-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
InvaderRam.
InvaderRamModeratori’d give him one more year. that’s it.
InvaderRamModeratorwell i remember when isaac was having all those hamstring issues and the rams had to alter his conditioning habits. just wondering if maybe the lifting and conditioning habits need to be altered for the linemen. this has been like going on for at least the last five years. it’s getting ridiculous.
InvaderRamModeratorhaven’t watched the game yet. not sure if i can bring myself to watch it.
one thing. with all these ol injuries is there something the rams coaching staff is or isn’t doing to cause these injuries? or is it just extremely bad luck?
November 22, 2015 at 4:07 am in reply to: Rams tackle Greg Robinson working to correct 'technical' issues #34518
InvaderRamModeratorwell. i’ll be watching greg this sunday.
InvaderRamModeratorgood video. thanks for that.
InvaderRamModeratori like carson wentz. i think the wrs are good enough.
cook. you know i haven’t really seen either play so i am really just speaking off what i have read and stats. but cook’s accuracy looks really spotty. of course. the advantage with him is that he plays in a pro style offense.
InvaderRamModeratora gimpy quinn has really hurt the defense. more than losing long and ogletree combined.
November 19, 2015 at 7:17 pm in reply to: Rams tackle Greg Robinson working to correct 'technical' issues #34437
InvaderRamModeratori remain hopeful that it’s just a technique and confidence issue. he’s only 23 and in his second year. he’s got everything you’d want in a tackle. and it seems like he’s humble and focused so it’d be a shame if he doesn’t pan out.
i think fans have been harsh on him though.
InvaderRamModeratorchances are he’s done. we can hope for the best, but odds are he’s done.
you usually see signs by this point. we’ve seen flashes but not nearly enough to have any kind of confidence. for me at least.
and odds are keenum isn’t the answer either. i would draft a qb next year. now that depends on what they think of mannion, but again. the chances of a third rounder making it are pretty slim so they’d better be pretty confident they have an answer among those three qbs if they don’t.
now watch foles prove me wrong…
InvaderRamModeratori personally wouldn’t just rely on boudreau to work his magic with these young guys. i’d count on maybe two ot three of those guys panning out. and then i’d draft more in the middle to late rounds and throw them in the mix but i definitely agree that they have more young guys with potential in there than they have in the past.
part of that reasoning is cuz of saffold. i think he’s unreliable. so even if wichmann and one other lineman pan out, they still need some depth. is it already there? i don’t know. we haven’t even seen enough of these guys to really know. i just think the odds are they won’t pan out. not even most of them. i can see rob, brown, wichmann, and maybe one other but then you need guys to backup and develop.
InvaderRamModeratorthe chances of mannion becoming successful are slim. rams need to hedge their bet and draft a qb next year. carson wentz is my pick. maybe second round.
InvaderRamModeratorwell i think most of us knew that the oline would be a problem this year given the amount of inexperience on the line. but i didn’t think it’d be this bad. i do think the rams will be in good shape though next year. the young guys will have that much more experience. some will be possibly be ready to step in as a starter.
but i think they’d be making a mistake if they didn’t draft at least one olineman. doesn’t have to be a premium pick but somewhere in the middle rounds would do.
InvaderRamModeratorwell. at least some of the top qbs will be coming into play? or will they be gone by the tenth pick?
InvaderRamModeratorok. i just read the response from coach o. still. fisher seems to indicate that foles will be the starter again. i guess he thinks some time away will be beneficial.
InvaderRamModeratorhow exactly does keenum alleviate any of those problems fisher just mentioned?
my guess is fisher thinks that to take a step forward the rams need to take a step back first? let foles sit back and get evaluate?
he pretty much says that foles will be the starter again at some point which to me seems to mean that he doesn’t think keenum is the answer.
What I got out of what Fisher said is that Foles doesn’t get/know the offense yet.
.
does that mean keenum does? what advantage does starting keenum offer if he doesn’t think keenum is the long-term starter? cuz he says foles will be back at some point or is that just lip service?
InvaderRamModeratorhow exactly does keenum alleviate any of those problems fisher just mentioned?
my guess is fisher thinks that to take a step forward the rams need to take a step back first? let foles sit back and get evaluate?
he pretty much says that foles will be the starter again at some point which to me seems to mean that he doesn’t think keenum is the answer.
also
I see that both Williams and Brown suffered season ending injuries on the Foles INT late in the game.
who is williams?
-
This reply was modified 10 years, 7 months ago by
InvaderRam.
InvaderRamModeratorone of the main problems against chicago was the 2 short passes that ended up going for 80+ tds. that plus the mental errors put them in a big hole. by that point the rams couldn’t just keep feeding it to gurley. i thought he actually ran ok against the bears in the first half. and if the rams had kept it close my guess is he woulda gotten stronger and stronger.
so i guess i’m saying another key to stopping gurley is to get a huge lead so he becomes obsolete. but that’s usually hard to do with this defense.
InvaderRamModeratorhe just seems really late on the throws. like he needs to be anticipating the receiver getting open. instead he waits for the receiver to actually get open before throwing it. but by then it’s too late. maybe part of that is not trusting his receivers to get open? i don’t know.
InvaderRamModeratorOkay, I’ve read a ton of Robinson-bashing for the holding calls.
I didn’t see the first one, but the second one looked completely bogus to me, and the third one was pretty freaking marginal. That third one gets overlooked more often than it is called, imo. It was one of those nanosecond deals that didn’t even affect the play.
i agree to a certain extent. but now the refs are watching him. and he’s got to be sure and be perfect. were they ticky tack fouls? yeah. but he’s gotta know now that they’re watching him. i think he got careless and sloppy. but again. i’m giving him until the end of next year. most guys maybe this is the year. but given how raw he is i’m waiting until year 3.
InvaderRamModeratornot totally surprised. foles hasn’t looked good. can’t get worse. can it?
one random thought i had today. if manning was a free agent next year, would you sign him given the talent on this roster? he played horrible this weekend, but here they’d just need him to be a caretaker of the offense.
-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

