Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2016 at 2:21 pm in reply to: Paul Wolfowitz 'might have to vote' for Hillary Clinton #51846
ZooeyModeratorTrump is going to get nothing but negative coverage. He is toasted.
August 28, 2016 at 11:57 am in reply to: Paul Wolfowitz 'might have to vote' for Hillary Clinton #51784
ZooeyModeratorYou may be right, Billy, about the “workers” rhetoric. That completely fits.
In any event, on a number of issues, it is apparent that Trump is just completely unfit for the job. He’s reckless. Bottom line. He is just reckless.
And nobody wants a reckless president.
(except for those people who root for the Joker).

ZooeyModeratorWell I’ve been waiting for the first QB to fall.
Winter is coming.
w
vYou know who’s next?
Tom Brady.
Only the Pats will conceal the injury because they won’t want his suspension deferred, and we will get another Patriots scandal.
ZooeyModeratorGotta imagine a lot of Cowboys fans are eyeing the Dak Prescott era now. Everybody has to be weary of Romo’s history. Worse than Saffold’s, I bet.
August 27, 2016 at 12:00 pm in reply to: Paul Wolfowitz 'might have to vote' for Hillary Clinton #51706
ZooeyModeratorIt is certainly true that Trump will push tax policies that benefit the 1% and screw all the rest of us (including his voters), but he is a loose cannon on trade. He has said things about NAFTA and the TPP that worry the 1%.
You know these guys are not lockstep foot soldiers who ask the 1% what they’re supposed to think. I seriously doubt any of the more infamous warrior neo-cons could give a crap about trade policy, for example. If they even think about it.
These guys are about foreign policy. And in that arena, they know…in detail…how batshit crazy Trump is.
And they’re right.
And they made the right choice.
Because in fact he IS that bad. They went and looked at the policies and evidence and came to the right conclusion.
.
.
Yeah, I think there are the neocons, and the Corporate rulers, and they have separate reasons for being wary of Trump.
The neocons are worried (rightly) about his foreign policy craziness, and not so much about the 1% (although they have some interest in that). Wall St and the rest of the barons are concerned about the trade and labor issues, and not so much the foreign policy stuff. I mean, I doubt Wolfowitz cares much about the minimum wage, and I doubt that the Koch brothers care much about Syria.
August 27, 2016 at 11:08 am in reply to: Paul Wolfowitz 'might have to vote' for Hillary Clinton #51700
ZooeyModeratorI really think now it’s just right-wing elites are afraid that they can’t trust Trump to do their bidding for the richest 0.1%.
You wish.

It’s because the people who were a mess before recognize with vivid clarity that Trump is even MORE of a mess. Oh, and, he will be helpful to the 1%…just look at his policies. His domestic economic policies help them even more than Bush did. So that is not the issue.
Even the last round of Bush nutcases recognize how bad Trump will be.
Remember in this thread we’re talking about what some nutcases got away with under Bush. That’s true.
AND then we act like Trump won’t get away with things? Forget it. It’s a pipe dream.
Of course he will. This wish that Trump isn’t going to be bad as he seems is just not going to hold up.
Even the previous assholes recognize that.
Yes he is worse, and yes once in office he can do things.
…
Yeah, I’m not so sure. I think Dak may be right.
It is certainly true that Trump will push tax policies that benefit the 1% and screw all the rest of us (including his voters), but he is a loose cannon on trade. He has said things about NAFTA and the TPP that worry the 1%. And a lot of wealth is only too happy to have immigrants who will work for below market wages, under unprotected conditions, with no rights. I think, at this point, it’s pretty clear that Trump doesn’t understand his own policies well enough to be trusted to do the “right” thing for the capitalists.
ZooeyModeratorWhy would modern humans mate with Neanderthals?
Bigger brains. Neanderthals apparently had bigger brains and were stronger physically.
Home Sapiens won the war. But it’s kinda like VHS versus Betamax. The latter should have.
Neanderthals were certainly more powerful than modern humans but it’s doubtful that their larger brains made them more intelligent. One study found that more of the Neanderthal’s brain was devoted to vision and body control than ours and less was geared towards cognition and social interaction. This would make sense given the way they hunted. Neanderthal’s didn’t kill from a distance like modern humans. Their spears were designed for stabbing not throwing. Therefore, a Neandethal had to get within a couple meters of his prey. Vision and body control would have come in handy when you’re only a few feet from an angry bison with nothing but a spear for protection. They must have been incredibly athletic to avoid getting trampled or gored every time they hunted but they must have taken a beating nonetheless. Many of their bones show evidence of healed fractures. They lived a tough life.
So… a bunch of linebackers, basically.
ZooeyModeratorAt one point, I pointed out how it’s kind of ridiculous that we are a very wealthy nation, but have so many poor people suffering, and we do very little to help the poor, and instead blame them for their plight while the mega-wealthy get richer.
Yeah, I just encountered a “meme” on facebook pointing out that of all the Wall St. criminals, the only one in jail is Bernie Madoff. Would that be because – instead of robbing the 99% – he robbed the 1%?
ZooeyModeratorDoesn’t it happen in bars around the country every night?
ZooeyModerator“Donald Trump, in my opinion, is God’s prosecuting attorney. He’s laying out the evidence…”
Donald prosecutes em’ then Buffy executes em’. Those demons don’t stand a chance.
Trump seems to attract a disproportionate amount of support from the unhinged.
It seems to me that his supporters just see whatever they want to see in Trump. He is just a walking, talking Rorschach.
August 24, 2016 at 2:27 pm in reply to: konn-troh-verss-ee: which qb should start w/ the 1s against Denver #51536
ZooeyModeratorI’d give Keenum about 10-15 snaps which could be 1-3 series, depending.
Goff I’d give around 25 – 30, switching from 1s to 2s throughout, and the rest to Mannion.
ZooeyModeratorThat sums it up, doesn’t it?
ZooeyModeratorI’m betting he did. It’s just nobody was comparing anybody to Montana yet.
Wrong. It was widely reported that during week three of his first training camp Montana looked like George Blanda during week two of his 25th training camp.
That is utter nonsense.
Montana never kicked an extra point in his life.
ZooeyModeratorHey Jim, seems to me like Rams have made a habit of trying to be smartest guys in the room at the draft. Whether its Brian Quick, Grob, Tavon and looking like Goff. In each case these players were seen as projects with huge upside. Fact is though in each case there was a more legitimate option who didnt need to develop as much who we passed on. Goff might be exception but sure gave up lots to get him. Would we be worse team with Alshon Jeffries (Quick) , Deondre Hopkins (Austin), Jake Mathews (Robinson) Paxton Lynch ( Goff)
by simdaddy 3:56 PMJT: I wouldn’t call it a “smartest guy” complex. I think the Rams pay too much attention to workouts and measurables over production and intangibles.
Oh, come on.
Grob was the consensus pick at the time. Some people preferred a different player, but nobody thought that was a “cute” pick. Goff was nothing like a reach, and had both the production and the intangibles. Tavon would have gone to the next team picking. Quick was a surprise. But none of the others really were.
ZooeyModeratorAnd I’m betting Montana didn’t look like Montana 3 weeks into his first NFL camp either.
I’m betting he did. It’s just nobody was comparing anybody to Montana yet.
August 23, 2016 at 7:25 pm in reply to: Tre Mason's mother: he is like '10-year-old' due to head injuries #51486
ZooeyModeratorYeah, right. Of course. And she would have an interest in that version of the story.
I suppose this will unfold. I wonder if there were any behaviors last year during the season that just never made it out. You would think some Rams reporter would have caught wind of some stories about Tre if he, you know, stated a belief in mermaids, or something.
August 23, 2016 at 6:21 pm in reply to: Tre Mason's mother: he is like '10-year-old' due to head injuries #51479
ZooeyModeratorWow. And what is he, 23? That isn’t good. Boy, he didn’t even play all that much, and I don’t remember him ever getting dinged on the field. Football players are just too big and fast.
Sounds like an injury settlement, and it’s over for Tre.
ZooeyModeratorI tend to think the cohesion/improvement on the OL is more responsible for the 7-7 red zone TD statistic than anything else.
ZooeyModeratorGood news for me, not so good for Quick.
I got Britt, Austin, Cooper, Marquez, and Spruce.
Don’t know if they are carrying Six.
ZooeyModeratorI don’t see anyone stopping this run game. The D doesn’t look right just yet. I watched live on Game Pass and had to listen to K.C announcers just awful . It was like they wouldn’t even mention a Rams player’s name and holding interviews during the game completely ignoring the Rams play.Worse than the infamous preseason Browns game a few years back.
Yep, and yep. Watching the D give up opening drive TDs in both games is disappointing. No Quinn sightings yet, but still. And Ogletree has been largely invisible, though I don’t know if that’s a bad sign, or not. I just know I saw a lot of him last year up until his injury.
Yeah, the KC announcers obviously did not care enough to prepare for the game. Seemed like they knew the names and numbers of about 10 – 15 Rams. The highlight of their coverage was the interview with the Modern Family guy. He was pretty funny. But I started muting the game at times because of the announcers.
ZooeyModeratorI agree on Goff. He has the physical tools, and the mentality, as far as I can tell. But he is a boy. I think when he starts to grow whiskers, he could be a good one. My concern at this point is that they start him too soon, and he gets mentally damaged – loses confidence. Let’s hope Weinke is a good psychologist.
I am also in the School of Not Caring whether it’s Keenum or Goff this year. I was perfectly content to go with Keenum and Mannion this year, and spend the #1 on a WR. Keenum is not a Pro Bowl guy, but he is steady and reliable. He doesn’t make bonehead mistakes. Like someone said, he knows who he is, and he plays with that knowledge. So I woulda been fine without Goff. But there are signs in that green, green boy that he can play the game.
I thought it was a good sign that the second TD drive (10 plays, 79 yards) was executed without Gurley on the field, and without Tavon touching the ball even once.
I like what I see of Cooper. He looks like another Little Engine that Could.
Speaking of which…no Spruce sighting last night. I was a bit surprised by that, and also by the lack of time for Green and Mannion. On the QBs, they may have been compensating for the Cowboys game when Goff didn’t get the time they wanted for him, and Mannion got more, but why didn’t we see Spruce or Green? Maybe Spruce was there, and Goff never targeted him. I dunno.
Brian Quick. I’m not sure when the sand runs out in that glass, but the guy better start catching the ball soon. Not every throw to him is going to be perfect, but sometimes you just gotta go Malcolm Brown on the throw, and catch it. I would think we are approaching Now or Never with Quick.
Hope Westbrooks and Marquez are okay. Neither one looked very good. Marquez let out one of those yells that is usually bad news.
August 20, 2016 at 10:53 am in reply to: This is the stuff of nightmares until you realize what it is #51206
ZooeyModeratorIt’s true. Posting on a phone is a pain.
ZooeyModeratorYet the GOP controls congress. Far from dead. Look at the impending breakup of the democrat party in the near future.
This is what I keep saying.
The gerrymandered districts will keep the Republicans in control of congress, of a lot of state governments, and won’t lose the Senate by much if they lose it at all. They will survive this storm.
August 20, 2016 at 10:42 am in reply to: youtube party…post a song you like which you think is not that widely known #51202
ZooeyModeratorI found this CD at the library a few years ago.
ZooeyModeratorAnother key here (IMO). Trump is only within striking distance to begin with because of Clinton.
I happen to not agree with that.
I think that other dem candidates are just as vulnerable in different ways. And Trump has tapped into something, and that thing is real, even if we also (rightly) don’t like what it is.
In terms of Clinton, yes she has been the object of a relentless right wing “pressure and smear” campaign for years now, but then tellingly she is still ahead.
That smear campaign is so deep that I rarely if ever hear anyone actually discuss policies when it comes to this election. Oddly, that even extends to policy-focused lefties who somehow lost their game over this one. It has reached the point where I positively don’t give a damm what people think of her as a person. To me that stuff is like a sugar-heavy diet—it ain’t nutrition. It’s not substance. I don’t care. (Actually I also don;t care about Trump’s gaffes, and strategic slams he knows won’t hurt him, and his personality. Just. Policies. People go well these are 2 bad candidates. Again, I could give a damm—that is as superficial as anything we complain about in the mass media. If I don’t get an authentic policy discussion soon, I may just tune the entire thing out.)
But at the same time Clinton has a dedicated core that sticks with someone who is liberal on social issues. Believe me I know…I could care less about personality or smear issues, but tend not to identify with the right-center dem world. And trying to discuss HC rationally with that dedicated core is nearly impossible. They can’t talk policies either.
This time, to me, it’s like the audience has no clothes yet they all complain about the emperor.
Well, I don’t care very much about discussing the policies this time around because it’s like discussing whether I would rather be drawn and quartered, or tied down naked on top of an agitated nest of bullet ants. I imagine being drawn and quartered is worse, but I wouldn’t get any pleasure out of going into the details of either of these events.
ZooeyModeratorTrump, who is on to something, will still probably fail to win simply because he’s an asshole.
So we can debate his opinions all we want, but the plain truth is that he expresses his opinions in such an irresponsible way that many people will refuse to vote for him.
More likely he expresses the true opinions of the majority of voters who are tied of being lied to by establishment candidates. His speech last night was all about fixing the nightmare caused by the so called ‘responsible’ candidates.
That doesn’t contradict what I said. I admit he “is on to something.” He clearly has expressed the sentiments of a lot of voters (I don’t know about “majority,” but a lot. For sure).
What I said is that his expression of those opinions is offensive to a lot of people.
ZooeyModeratorEpisode 2 was more cotton candy, but what did anyone expect? They can’t show anything revealing. And they need stories.
The stories surely are written retrospectively. And I’m guessing a lot of the focus will be on cuts. The show is Hard Knocks, after all. So this week we got quite a bit of Randolph, who then rips an ACL and is done. If Randolph had not ripped his ACL, he probably wouldn’t have made the episode at all. I think they are out there all day filming everybody, and then after the game, they go back and pull all the footage they have of the guys who were “stories,” one way or another. It’s cotton candy.
I was glad to see there are only 3 more episodes. I thought it lasted all season. I have to watch it because it’s the Rams, but I will be very glad when it’s over because the show sucks.
August 18, 2016 at 11:21 pm in reply to: This is the stuff of nightmares until you realize what it is #51092
ZooeyModeratorYes, our destruction of the biosphere continues unabated.
Everyone should really enjoy awesome creatures like the leatherback sea turtle while they can because we will likely be the last generation to see them.
—————-
Do you ever just sit back and feel ‘awe’ and ‘wonder’ over the variety
of life-forms on this planet? I do. I mean, think of hummingbirds. And leatherback turtles. And mantis shrimps. And tapirs. Vampire Squids. Luna Moths. Ya know. There’s just a shitload of life-forms on this little dysfunctional planet.w
vYeah, the great diversity is awe-inspiring but what I like is that I share ancestry with all the myriad creatures that comprise that great diversity. It’s the interrelatedness of it all that gets me. I share ancestry with the tapir, giant squid and the redwood tree. I share ancestry with millions of species living and extinct. That includes every species that is living or has ever lived. They are all relatives.
On the other hand, that makes sending Xmas cards a chore…
Well, goody for YOU, Mr. Nittany.
I am not related to those critters.
I am descended from the angels that built Atlantis back in the Golden Age.
ZooeyModeratorTrump, who is on to something, will still probably fail to win simply because he’s an asshole.
So we can debate his opinions all we want, but the plain truth is that he expresses his opinions in such an irresponsible way that many people will refuse to vote for him.
ZooeyModeratorTrump is a product of a broken America, the same as the Baconator and increased suicide rates. That’s what I got out of that article. There’s probably something to that. He’s definitely tapped into the anxieties of white males. And, he’s increased the anxieties of just about any other demographic.
Yeah, me too. Trump isn’t a “cure.” He’s a “lash out.” He’s a Samson pulling down the pillars of the temple. “I don’t care if it kills me, I am putting an end to this shit one way or another.”
-
AuthorPosts

