Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 3,031 through 3,060 (of 8,029 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133195
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That and Zooey Deschanel pronounces her own name zoh ee.

    It’s possible that Zooey Deschanel’s parents weren’t experts in phonology.

    And “Jaxon’s” and “Kaytlinn’s” parents were not experts in spelling.

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133190
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That guy.

    What was his name?

    He was a good poster, but a bit of a dick. And started his own board. Had a lot of quality stuff to post, but… you know… undone by ego. Whatever happened to all those people we used to post with. {sigh}.

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133189
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    And don’t forget…

    I’m the guy that took down GarlicExile (or whatever his name was) for posting with two handles because I noticed how he used semi-colons. Or something.

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133188
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Billy_T
    Participant
    Thanks for the responses.

    I agree with both of youze, mostly. Except, if memory serves, Zooey still doesn’t know how to pronounce his own name.

    Okay. Now I no longer care about the end of the world, or anything else this thread is about.

    Find me ANY instance in the English language in which “oo” is pronounced like the Long O vowel sound. There isn’t one.

    “oo” can be pronounced like

    book
    look
    cook
    nook
    crook

    or like

    moon
    noon
    spoon
    room
    zoom
    doom or

    zoo

    That’s it. Those are your two choices.

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133179
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I basically agree with zooey.

    So do I.

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133174
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Longer answer:

    They could put the GOP out of business. Get rid of the filibuster, make DC and Puerto Rico states, abolish the electoral college, pass a voting rights act, create universal health care, and spend a bunch of $ on stuff that helps people, and raises their standard of living. Republicans would be relegated to about 1/4 of the seats in congress, and bit more in the Senate, and they would never win the White House again. That would be the end. So…they COULD do that, and they don’t want to.

    They don’t want to do any of it. For all the talk of investment in greenery, the Democrats placed Joe Manchin as the chair of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. It’s self-evident that if Democrats were honestly committed to moving away from fossil fuels, Joe Manchin wouldn’t even be on that committee at all, let alone the Chair of it. I mean… FFS… this isn’t an oversight that nobody considered the consequences of.

    It’s the same right across the Senate and House. Look whom the Dems have placed where on the various committees.

    But it doesn’t make much difference at this point. I really don’t think there is anything we can do about it. Literally. It’s too late.

    The media conglomerates control what Americans know, and to a large extent, what they believe about what’s going on. You can’t unravel the propaganda model because the 1% control congress. You can’t cut the $ from the 1% to congress because you will never convince people to vote for people who will do that because the 1% controls all the media messaging. And even if we got control of congress, the 1% would use their influence over the legal system to jack up attempts to reform the system. They have tentacles everywhere, and you can’t remove them one-by-one.

    Try removing this tree without damaging the structure:

    So you’re looking at a complete revolution…which you can’t get people on board for because of the propaganda model…and even if you succeeded at that, the supply network would come to a halt, and food would stop being delivered to grocery stores, and in 3 days time, the violence would start. And within a few short weeks/months, we would have several million people displaced and dead, and that would be that.

    Some indigenous communities in a few places around the world might be equipped to deal with that, but industrialized societies would go down the crapper in minutes.

    And we are past the point of no return on a few tipping points. We are to the place where we need to actively reduce the carbon/methane in the atmosphere, and we aren’t going to do that with a broken down supply chain.

    To sum up: We can’t reverse climate catastrophe without revolution. Revolution will destroy the supply chain. We can’t reverse climate catastrophe without a supply chain.

    So we’re screwed. IMO.

    in reply to: political tweets #133172
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Could the Dems sink the GOP if they wanted to? #133166
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Short answer for now:

    *** My leftist GM hopes: The Dems destroy the GOP, and then leftists finally form strong coalitions and force the Dems into the dustbin of history too.

    This is EXACTLY why the Dems don’t do it.

    in reply to: political tweets #133154
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t have time to read this, but it looks interesting, so I’m putting it here. Mackeyser retweeted this.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Giants game #133140
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Sloppy, but decisive, and 5-1 is a good thing.

    I didn’t watch the second half after the opening drive.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/12 thru 10/17 #133111
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think it’s all the fault of the numbers. They should never have allowed such chaos. Keep them the way they’ve been since the time of Sargon of Akkad. Back then, your defensive linemen were in the 70s and 80s, linebackers in the 50s and 60s, DBs in the 20s, 30s and 40s, with rare exceptions. Deviation typically resulted in being thrown to the crocodiles, unless Mrs. Sargon saved you.

    Let just anyone wear #1 and you’re going to get double punts and worse.

    Good point. Football needs to return to its former discipline.

    The more crocodiles you have, the fewer chaotic plays.

    in reply to: Rams & play action in 2021 #133109
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Okay, so nothing about whether Stafford “likes” play action or not. That is apparently not the issue, or not the main issue, in any event. What this looks like is that McVay called more play action with Goff because he believed he HAD to. And with Stafford, he uses it differently because he can.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/12 thru 10/17 #133107
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Still wondering why there was no illegal man downfield on the double punt. Anything? —

    I don’t know what the rule says, exactly.

    Can the linemen release after the punt? Or after the ball travels past the line of scrimmage?

    If it’s the former, they were good to go after the first punt.

    in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #133105
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Gruden’s racist comment #133099
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    There’s no way there aren’t more skeletons in 650K emails. Somebody let out the ones that damaged Gruden, and I’d like to know why.

    It wasn’t the league, so somebody else has ’em, and they released only some of them. So… what’s going on here?

    in reply to: Gruden’s racist comment #133068
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Jim McVay (Sean’s uncle) was one of the people Gruden was emailing.

    Okay, but that doesn’t tell us anything about Sean.

    I have two idiot brothers and a father who were livid about Colin Kapernick and BLM, and I doubt that they would voice objections to anybody who said something like Gruden did.

    They doesn’t mean I share those views, too, just because we’re related.

    in reply to: Gruden’s racist comment #133060
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Sitting here imagining all of the College Coaches, Scouts, Assistant Coaches,
    Media People, worrying about old/new emails they have sent.

    w
    v

    Well, there’s 650,000 emails, I heard. So Gruden isn’t the only human who’s going to come off badly.

    My question is “Why Gruden?”

    Next question is…what did they say about Spygate?

    in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #133051
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: political tweets #133029
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Gruden’s racist comment #133028
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Gruden and McVay are good friends, right.

    Sigh.

    w
    v

    Maybe. They know each other, and share a love of football, and like each other, I guess. I’ve never seen any evidence that they play together outside the office. I have “friends” at work whom I never see socially.

    But…maybe they are, and maybe McVay shares similar views. In my experience, there are a lot of a-holes in the human species.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #133026
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: Gruden’s racist comment #133014
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: RAMs stats #132975
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    First NFL Game – A 28–0 loss to the Detroit Lions, 9/10/37.

    The lingering memory of that bitter defeat will certainly be on the revenge-filled minds of the Los Angeles Rams on October 24.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: setting up the Giants game (updated w/ good 1 by JB Long) #132959
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    This situation certainly brings to mind last year’s game against the Jets.

    I would hope that the Rams have also noticed the similarity in the situation.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, the Seahawks look done. I dunno how they beat SF.

    On the Rams, I think Cowherd is right about Stafford. Top of the Tier Two guys. That’s what it looks like to me so far. As for the boring offense…that’s the price of Stafford. That was the red flag (to me) about him in the trade. He doesn’t like play action, and he doesn’t like pre-snap motion. McVay has accommodated that.

    in reply to: political tweets #132945
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Gruden’s racist comment #132938
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, so…thing is…

    100% of people living in this country are familiar with the history of big-lipped caricatures of African Americans used to mock them in 20th century illustrations. There is no way, absolutely no way that Gruden is unaware of what he did. Even if he isn’t a Proud Boy sympathizer, he went where no white guy can go. It was a racist shot. I’m not buying the “rubber lips” line of defense, even if he DOES use that term (which nobody else has ever used, afaik). Nope.

    And I don’t think there is any “atoning.” There’s nothing anybody can do about it. Gruden exposed himself. That happens to famous people. He’s gotta have to live with it, and have it affect his relationships with people however it affects them.

    in reply to: Should the defense be better? #132937
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Fuck this soft zone

    ‘Zine it.

    in reply to: Chappelle #132931
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Okay, just watched it.

    Was there a second reference? I missed it, but I was pretty sleepy. The one at the beginning…if that was controversial, I don’t know what to say.

Viewing 30 posts - 3,031 through 3,060 (of 8,029 total)