Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ZooeyModeratorThat and Zooey Deschanel pronounces her own name zoh ee.
It’s possible that Zooey Deschanel’s parents weren’t experts in phonology.
And “Jaxon’s” and “Kaytlinn’s” parents were not experts in spelling.
ZooeyModeratorThat guy.
What was his name?
He was a good poster, but a bit of a dick. And started his own board. Had a lot of quality stuff to post, but… you know… undone by ego. Whatever happened to all those people we used to post with. {sigh}.
ZooeyModeratorAnd don’t forget…
I’m the guy that took down GarlicExile (or whatever his name was) for posting with two handles because I noticed how he used semi-colons. Or something.
ZooeyModeratorBilly_T
Participant
Thanks for the responses.I agree with both of youze, mostly. Except, if memory serves, Zooey still doesn’t know how to pronounce his own name.
Okay. Now I no longer care about the end of the world, or anything else this thread is about.
Find me ANY instance in the English language in which “oo” is pronounced like the Long O vowel sound. There isn’t one.
“oo” can be pronounced like
book
look
cook
nook
crookor like
moon
noon
spoon
room
zoom
doom orzoo
That’s it. Those are your two choices.
ZooeyModeratorLonger answer:
They could put the GOP out of business. Get rid of the filibuster, make DC and Puerto Rico states, abolish the electoral college, pass a voting rights act, create universal health care, and spend a bunch of $ on stuff that helps people, and raises their standard of living. Republicans would be relegated to about 1/4 of the seats in congress, and bit more in the Senate, and they would never win the White House again. That would be the end. So…they COULD do that, and they don’t want to.
They don’t want to do any of it. For all the talk of investment in greenery, the Democrats placed Joe Manchin as the chair of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. It’s self-evident that if Democrats were honestly committed to moving away from fossil fuels, Joe Manchin wouldn’t even be on that committee at all, let alone the Chair of it. I mean… FFS… this isn’t an oversight that nobody considered the consequences of.
It’s the same right across the Senate and House. Look whom the Dems have placed where on the various committees.
But it doesn’t make much difference at this point. I really don’t think there is anything we can do about it. Literally. It’s too late.
The media conglomerates control what Americans know, and to a large extent, what they believe about what’s going on. You can’t unravel the propaganda model because the 1% control congress. You can’t cut the $ from the 1% to congress because you will never convince people to vote for people who will do that because the 1% controls all the media messaging. And even if we got control of congress, the 1% would use their influence over the legal system to jack up attempts to reform the system. They have tentacles everywhere, and you can’t remove them one-by-one.
Try removing this tree without damaging the structure:

So you’re looking at a complete revolution…which you can’t get people on board for because of the propaganda model…and even if you succeeded at that, the supply network would come to a halt, and food would stop being delivered to grocery stores, and in 3 days time, the violence would start. And within a few short weeks/months, we would have several million people displaced and dead, and that would be that.
Some indigenous communities in a few places around the world might be equipped to deal with that, but industrialized societies would go down the crapper in minutes.
And we are past the point of no return on a few tipping points. We are to the place where we need to actively reduce the carbon/methane in the atmosphere, and we aren’t going to do that with a broken down supply chain.
To sum up: We can’t reverse climate catastrophe without revolution. Revolution will destroy the supply chain. We can’t reverse climate catastrophe without a supply chain.
So we’re screwed. IMO.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorShort answer for now:
*** My leftist GM hopes: The Dems destroy the GOP, and then leftists finally form strong coalitions and force the Dems into the dustbin of history too.
This is EXACTLY why the Dems don’t do it.
ZooeyModeratorI don’t have time to read this, but it looks interesting, so I’m putting it here. Mackeyser retweeted this.
Thread. This week, the New York Times's recent dangerous reporting on "crime" reached a new low. I try to document what happened carefully below, because what happens to the leading newspaper in the U.S. has effects on how we all get information about the world.
— Alec Karakatsanis (@equalityAlec) October 17, 2021
ZooeyModeratorSloppy, but decisive, and 5-1 is a good thing.
I didn’t watch the second half after the opening drive.
ZooeyModeratorI think it’s all the fault of the numbers. They should never have allowed such chaos. Keep them the way they’ve been since the time of Sargon of Akkad. Back then, your defensive linemen were in the 70s and 80s, linebackers in the 50s and 60s, DBs in the 20s, 30s and 40s, with rare exceptions. Deviation typically resulted in being thrown to the crocodiles, unless Mrs. Sargon saved you.
Let just anyone wear #1 and you’re going to get double punts and worse.
Good point. Football needs to return to its former discipline.
The more crocodiles you have, the fewer chaotic plays.
ZooeyModeratorOkay, so nothing about whether Stafford “likes” play action or not. That is apparently not the issue, or not the main issue, in any event. What this looks like is that McVay called more play action with Goff because he believed he HAD to. And with Stafford, he uses it differently because he can.
ZooeyModeratorStill wondering why there was no illegal man downfield on the double punt. Anything? —
I don’t know what the rule says, exactly.
Can the linemen release after the punt? Or after the ball travels past the line of scrimmage?
If it’s the former, they were good to go after the first punt.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorThere’s no way there aren’t more skeletons in 650K emails. Somebody let out the ones that damaged Gruden, and I’d like to know why.
It wasn’t the league, so somebody else has ’em, and they released only some of them. So… what’s going on here?
ZooeyModeratorJim McVay (Sean’s uncle) was one of the people Gruden was emailing.
Okay, but that doesn’t tell us anything about Sean.
I have two idiot brothers and a father who were livid about Colin Kapernick and BLM, and I doubt that they would voice objections to anybody who said something like Gruden did.
They doesn’t mean I share those views, too, just because we’re related.
ZooeyModeratorSitting here imagining all of the College Coaches, Scouts, Assistant Coaches,
Media People, worrying about old/new emails they have sent.w
vWell, there’s 650,000 emails, I heard. So Gruden isn’t the only human who’s going to come off badly.
My question is “Why Gruden?”
Next question is…what did they say about Spygate?
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorThat's a very good point. "I don't fight fascists because I will win, I fight fascists because they are fascists."https://t.co/uXwRQF8RTI
— Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ (@caitoz) October 12, 2021
ZooeyModeratorGruden and McVay are good friends, right.
Sigh.
w
vMaybe. They know each other, and share a love of football, and like each other, I guess. I’ve never seen any evidence that they play together outside the office. I have “friends” at work whom I never see socially.
But…maybe they are, and maybe McVay shares similar views. In my experience, there are a lot of a-holes in the human species.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorFirst NFL Game – A 28–0 loss to the Detroit Lions, 9/10/37.
The lingering memory of that bitter defeat will certainly be on the revenge-filled minds of the Los Angeles Rams on October 24.
October 10, 2021 at 11:52 pm in reply to: Nurses fired for not getting COVID-19 vaccine explain their rationale #132968
ZooeyModerator
October 10, 2021 at 3:19 pm in reply to: setting up the Giants game (updated w/ good 1 by JB Long) #132959
ZooeyModeratorThis situation certainly brings to mind last year’s game against the Jets.
I would hope that the Rams have also noticed the similarity in the situation.
October 10, 2021 at 10:16 am in reply to: cowherd editorial vid: seattle outdated, mcvay too pedestrian #132955
ZooeyModeratorYeah, the Seahawks look done. I dunno how they beat SF.
On the Rams, I think Cowherd is right about Stafford. Top of the Tier Two guys. That’s what it looks like to me so far. As for the boring offense…that’s the price of Stafford. That was the red flag (to me) about him in the trade. He doesn’t like play action, and he doesn’t like pre-snap motion. McVay has accommodated that.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorYeah, so…thing is…
100% of people living in this country are familiar with the history of big-lipped caricatures of African Americans used to mock them in 20th century illustrations. There is no way, absolutely no way that Gruden is unaware of what he did. Even if he isn’t a Proud Boy sympathizer, he went where no white guy can go. It was a racist shot. I’m not buying the “rubber lips” line of defense, even if he DOES use that term (which nobody else has ever used, afaik). Nope.
And I don’t think there is any “atoning.” There’s nothing anybody can do about it. Gruden exposed himself. That happens to famous people. He’s gotta have to live with it, and have it affect his relationships with people however it affects them.
ZooeyModeratorFuck this soft zone
‘Zine it.
ZooeyModeratorOkay, just watched it.
Was there a second reference? I missed it, but I was pretty sleepy. The one at the beginning…if that was controversial, I don’t know what to say.
-
AuthorPosts


