Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 36,991 through 37,020 (of 47,808 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Very good points. What other team would keep Saffold around as long as the Rams?

    But RS was playing well before he went out.

    in reply to: Albert Breer from MMQB #60596
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Join me. Join me on the dark side.

    I think it’s not in my nature.

    Though admittedly, not everyone sees me that way.

    in reply to: Albert Breer from MMQB #60582
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’m listening to Breer up there, and it sounds like he is implying that Fisher is putting Bailey and Mason down as personnel office failures which isn’t the read I read it, and which seems absurd.

    Yeah I agree with that. Fisher did not put them down as personnel failures. That’s a complete misread.

    The actual quotation:

    We’ve had some unfortunate things take place with some high picks in Stedman Bailey and Tre Mason and those kinds of things you don’t anticipate.

    I don’t know HOW you misread that statement to be a jab at personnel people.

    It means what it says. They took a hit on 2 picks when bad things happened to them. I mean how in the hell do you read that as Fisher blaming Snead for Bailey getting shot.

    That’s way, way, way off. Weirdly off.

    .

    in reply to: Rams Junior High: Inside a Dysfunctional Front Office #60569
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Fisher ran the draft. imo

    I don’t think it’s that direct or simple.

    Fisher “farms out” a lot of the draft decisions, because, as he himself has said, he does not know which guard to take in round 5 (that’s pretty much his exact words).

    I think it really works like this. They work together to create rankings, long before the draft. And then stick to the rankings during the draft. Like most head coaches, JF only works on knowing obvious top picks. He’s not a draftnik who studies it down to the 5th round level. He lets scouts and Snead do that work. And he listens to them.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ou mean like those all over the MSM stating Hildabeast has a 97% chance of winning?

    That’s a dodge.

    Let me let you in on something. You’re among leftists. We see through the MSM in ways you’ve never even dreamed of.

    What we DON’T do however is act like only partisan bot sites have the truth.

    It is possible to put up credible evidence for the stupid claim you made do it. And stay away from the laughable slogans like in the post I respond to here.

    Evidence. No dodges, quips, or slogans. Evidence.

    .

    in reply to: informal poll: will Fisher be the coach next year? #60554
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    But the contextistas are wrong. That’s one thing I think we can all agree on.

    Spoken like a true Recordite.

    Of course THAT was spoken like a true Contextista.

    How many Recordites does it take to change a lightbulb?
    I don’t know what’s the tally so far?

    How many Contextistas does it take to change a lightbulb?
    Well describe the situation.

    What is the one thing all Recordites and Contextistas agree on?
    The helmet logo.

    .

    in reply to: informal poll: will Fisher be the coach next year? #60552
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    How important is actually winning to him?

    \

    I don’t agree with the way you frame that.

    You build in an assumption I don’t accept.

    You ASSUME that sticking with Fisher would mean not caring about winning. Well you make see it that way but it would take A LOT to make me think SK saw it that way.

    Now you are a dedicated Recordite but what if SK is a Contextista? What if he believes, legitimately, that Fisher does not reduce to his record, but that the situation worked against him? That is–they need a qb and have for 3 years.

    Unless you want to be a completely fundamentalist Recordite, which knowing you I assume you don’t (ie. the fundamentalist part), you have to concede it’s at least theoretically possible someone else, including SK, could see it differently.

    We don’t know what will happen. We all have guesses. For that matter we could ALL be completely wrong and things happen for reasons no one anticipated. BUT what we CAN’T do IMO is speak for SK as if we knew his mind through mind-reading.

    So to me you just have to concede this…for all we know, SK does not share your assumptions. That’s really possible.

    Again we are mostly just debating things based on what each of us thinks. That makes it a clash of opinions. When it comes to SK’s mind, we’re all just guessing. So absolutely, I would never simply assume that (1) SK “doesn’t care about winning,” and (2) that for him keeping Fisher would mean he “doesn’t care about winning.” That’s YOU. It’s a valid opinion in terms of it just being an opinion, but you cannot possibly claim you know SK’s mind

    There are perfectly valid ways to construe this where he keeps Fisher BECAUSE he cares about winning.

    Fair enough?

    in reply to: Rams Junior High: Inside a Dysfunctional Front Office #60547
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    That’s a real article. Inside info, the whole 9 yards. (And you beat me to posting it by 2 minutes! Lol.)

    So it’s a real article. As in.

    Ruh-roh.

    in reply to: Hekker having the greatest punting season ever #60510
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    He should be great since he gets enough opportunity year after year.

    There have been far worse teams in NFL history. Heck there have been worse teams in RAMS history.

    But their punters didn’t all become great.

    If you look at what Hekker does, it’s the ability and execution, not the number of chances.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    “I look at this as being my responsibility, the win-loss record. We need to do a better job from a personnel standpoint.

    Some are reading that as Fisher dissing Snead. I don’t read it that way. I see Fisher saying “we.” WE have to do better. Since he is pretty deeply involved in personnel, then, that can’t be said without it touching on him. That’s what I think he intends.

    in reply to: reporters etc. set up the ATLANTA game #60490
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Opponent Profile: Falcons Come To Los Angeles Needing Win

    Rams Opponent Profile: Falcons Come To Los Angeles Needing Win

    The Los Angeles Rams are playing for pride at this point of the 2016 NFL regular season, as their 4-8 record means the team will once again miss the postseason and not achieve a winning year. However, the Rams still can play spoiler to an old division rival from the past this weekend, as the Atlanta Falcons arrive in town desperately needing a victory for their own playoff aspirations.

    The two teams were once division rivals from 1967 to 2001, and although the Falcons and the Rams have only played a handful of times in the last 15 years, the past for these two teams runs deep through the annals of the Los Angeles franchise’s memory. After all, the last time the Rams made the playoffs (2004), the Falcons beat them by 30 points in the divisional round, and the Rams have not been back to the postseason since then.

    Season Record

    Atlanta is tied for first place in the NFC South with a 7-5 record, but the Falcons have lost some very close games this year. Atlanta has lost four games by a touchdown or less this year, while three of the losses have been by a combined six points. Needless to say, the Falcons could easily be 10-2 right now with a little better late-game execution, especially on defense.

    Then again, Atlanta has won three games by a TD or less as well, so the team has been effective at times during crunch time in the fourth quarter. The Falcons have wins over the Oakland Raiders and the Denver Broncos this season, so they’ve been able to beat the better teams in the NFL, although the overtime loss to the San Diego Chargers stings a bit right now.

    Falcons On Offense

    There have been whispers about Atlanta quarterback Matt Ryan for the MVP award this season, and the numbers don’t lie. With a 112.3 QB rating, Ryan has tossed 27 TDs this year and only seven interceptions. These are the best numbers of his career, and Ryan leads the NFL with a 9.2 yards-per-attempt mark right now, meaning the Rams defense will be on its toes the entire game.

    Ryan has one of the best receivers in the NFL to throw to in Julio Jones, who already has 1,253 yards receiving this season. Meanwhile, the running back duo of Devonta Freeman and Tevin Coleman has combined for over 1,000 yards rushing and over 650 yards receiving while scoring 16 times between them. It’s a dangerous and diverse offense that leads the NFL in scoring right now (32.2 points per game).

    Falcons On Defense

    While the offense has thrived all season, the Atlanta defense has not. Giving up 27.9 points per game has the Falcons ranked 29th in the NFL currently. The unit is led by a trio of young players: Safety Ricardo Allen (69 tackles), linebacker Deion Jones (74 tackles) and safety Keanu Neal (79 tackles). The top nine tackles on this defense play linebacker or in the defensive backfield, so Atlanta lacks the punch up front to truly disrupt an opposing offense. This could be an opportunity for Rams RB Todd Gurley to bust loose and finally have a huge game in 2016.

    Falcons Players To Watch

    LB Vic Beasley leads the team with 10.5 sacks, and no one else on the Falcons defense has even half as many QB burials. The Los Angeles offensive schemes will want to account for Beasley on every passing play. If the Rams can do that, they may have a chance to score some points on the Atlanta defense.

    On the other side, WR Taylor Gabriel has been sneaking up on too many opposing defenses lately as the secondaries focus on Jones and the RBs out of the backfield. He has the ability to hurt teams with his speed and shiftiness in the open field.

    Outlook

    After losing to the New Orleans Saints and the New England Patriots by a combined 44 points in the last two games, Los Angeles gets to face yet another crazy-good offense. It’s tough to imagine the Rams slowing down the Falcons offense right now, and with Atlanta needing a victory more than L.A., look for the Rams to drop another game by a large margin. The Falcons will win, 42-21.

    in reply to: informal poll: what's wrong with the offense, can it pick up? #60485
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Your optimism is depressing beyond all measure.

    It’s working!

    .

    in reply to: Climate change: Learning to think like a geologist #60482
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Slavery imposed through energy.

    in reply to: Conspiracy musings #60480
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    just think people KNOW they are being lied to and after a while, they are willing to believe in conspiracies of all kinds.

    w
    v

    Enh. You made all that up.

    It’s part of your effort to return us to a feudal monarchy, with Bernie crowned king.

    in reply to: informal poll: what's wrong with the offense, can it pick up? #60479
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in a sense yes. a player having a rare decent game on an offense that did absolutely nothing doesn’t really mean anything. especially given his history.

    Depends on the question you’re asking.

    First, this offense has done better than it did on the road in NE against a shrewd veteran defense who knew how to take it to the rookie qb. IMO anyone who thinks the offense will always play the way it did that game is stuck too deep in last-bad-game-is-truth -itis.

    AND GR progressing is good news cause since you have to expect the others will rebound from the Patz game to at least be okay again…then GR being improved will be useful.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Starters not getting it done
    GRob

    Though, interestingly…not last game. Last game he graded out as their best offensive player.

    on an offense that was only able to score 10 garbage points and couldn’t even crack 200 total yards. i believe they had 24 total yards in the first half.

    i desperately wanted grob to come good. i wanted this offense to come good.

    at this point i’m wondering if even gurley can become solid.

    i have good feelings about goff but only because i’ve only seen 3 games.

    i’d at least expect to see some improvement these next four games. if not then i don’t know what to think.

    So now we judge one player based not on his actual play but the production of the offense as a whole?

    GR played pretty well last game. That point stands regardless of other considerations.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Starters not getting it done
    GRob

    Though, interestingly…not last game. Last game he graded out as their best offensive player.

    Yea, I thought about mentioning that but decided not to because it could be the DE he was matched up with isn’t that good. Sheard has 3 1/2 sacks all year and I feel GRob struggles with the speed guys.

    I’m hoping he shows up again this week matched up against Jackson who has 0 sacks this season and 9 for his career…so hopefully he posts another 70+ rating.

    He;s not the only mediocre DE GR has ever faced.

    More likely, GR just had a good game.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Starters not getting it done
    GRob

    Though, interestingly…not last game. Last game he graded out as their best offensive player.

    in reply to: Offensive Line #60430
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Last year Gurley had 5 games where he exceeded 100 yds and in his last 8 games he only broke that barrier 1 time. So I’m not so sure they protected/blocked like gang busters last year.

    I don’t think that’s completely the case. If you look at the last games and the yards per carry, they are not uniformly down in the last games.

    Ignore the yellow bar here, it was just an accident and doesn’t mean anything here.

    in reply to: Offensive Line #60427
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    However….As Zooey said, we are 12 weeks in now and this should be coming together and I would agree with that. Personally I’m leaning towards this one isn’t about the X’s and O’s but we need to think about the Joes.

    If it were just personnel then (I think) they would not have improved as a unit down the stretch in 2015. Which, they did. Not that this would be a top OL but it was playing effectively enough at the end of last year.

    Yes 12 weeks in ought to be enough time to overcome the problems of being in sync in a new system. Even a new system installed under the rules of the new CBA, with a first-time coordinator installing a system for the first time. But that was a factor this year, as was moving…and again, in the history of the NFL, only one team has played well after moving. But those problems were real–it would be a bizarro universe if they weren’t.

    NOW it seems to me what they’re dealing with is obvious. Rookie qb. For example, teams are now loading up and blitzing like crazy and it takes out both the run game and puts pressure on the new qb.

    in reply to: Offensive Line #60425
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The QB has to learn an entire new language.

    Yes and he’s still playing like a struggling rookie. That’s even with the fact that no one becomes a qb in the first place unless they are mentally set up to learn a system. AND the issue is unit cohesion anyway. Not everyone will be on the same page. I remember Saffold talking about learning a new system in 2011. It puts hesitation into everything. Heck Keenum was talking about this during the pre-season. It was new for him, too.

    To be perfectly honest, I don’t get your forgetfulness on this. You can say other factors for you weigh more. But no one can just armchair into existence the idea that it’s easy for a team to learn an entirely new system. This has come up before, in spades, with extensive backing from articles and player comments and so on. I think for example about the switch to the McD system in 2011. It is just simply not an easy process, and that’s especially the case now, when the new CBA limits practice time. None of this is new discussion.

    It’s a factor. You decide if it’s a major one. In my own history of watching the Rams I have never seen it NOT be a major factor when it happens.

    in reply to: Offensive Line #60421
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Okay, but I don’t know what “new system” means.

    I don’t mean to be flippant, but there’s zone blocking, and man blocking, right? I don’t know these things because the only football I ever played was, “Zooey, go to the corner of the hedge, and cut hard towards the elm tree….”

    But how effing difficult can this be? You’re a blocker. Block. That’s your job. Push this guy aside, and create a seam.

    The fact that I am deciding between a condo in Malibu and beach house in Santa Monica shouldn’t affect the outcome of that mano a mano contest. Especially 12 weeks into the season when that decision has been made, and I have already got carpet stains in my new place.

    We go over this every time the Rams learn a new system.

    Yes it’s hard. You learn a new language.

    The difference in changing a SYSTEM as opposed to just changing the plays you use is that you have to learn an entirely new terminology, and that’s for a fat NFL playbook.

    Players describe it as being like learning a new language. The last time this came up I used this analogy—one day, they change the language on all street signs. You will get used to it but at first it always involves more thinking than acting.

    No one in the NFL ever describes this experience as easy.

    So no it’s not just you run some old plays you know. You have to learn an entirely new terminology, plus in the Rams system, every variable built in to every play—sight adjustments, for example.

    ..

    in reply to: Offensive Line #60413
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I don’t know, but Rich Gannon noted what he thought were problems with the blocking scheme when reviewing film in preparation for the Rams game that he did the color commentary for this season. Can’t recall which game it was. He said too often the scheme left defenders unblocked who would then disrupt the play. I don’t know how much stock to put in that thoug

    LARam had a good response to that. That’s common throughout the league, the Rams don’t do it every play, and it’s a play design thing for plays going the other direction. THere’s nothing unique to the Rams about that.

    in reply to: Offensive Line #60412
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    It is not really a new system. It is still a Jeff Fisher offense. All it is, play calling. You just switch OCs, with Fisher’s type of coach, is just being masked. Unless he has an experienced OC like Norv Turner, per say, I’ll say it again, you are just masking it with a Fisher guy, and he is running Fisher’s plays.

    It is a new system. How different it is from the previous system I can’t say, but it is new.

    I could be wrong but I don’t think Fisher has an offensive system that he uses wherever he goes. He has a style. And regardless if the system in place is based on a WCO, Coryell, Erhardt, etc system, the playcalling and overall strategy will reflect his style – which is to use the run to set up play action.

    Nittany’s right. And Jack you’re just now engaging in posting sheer disinformation. Fisher does not have a system he brings with him. A system involves terminology plus techniques that have to be learned, and in the history of Fisher’s teams, his different coordinators have used both variants on the WCO and on the Coryell offense (which is basically what they have now).

    There is no such thing as a “Fisher system.”

    And YES they DID learn a new offense this off-season, and in fact the players straightforwardly said so. Boras altered things, they installed it, players talked about it.

    AND people who claim to say what a “Fisher offense” is are, in my experience, invariably just plain wrong. For example, they often neglect to notice that taking a fairly high percentage of downfield shots is a regular Fisher thing. Whenever I do the numbers on this the Rams are in the top third of the league in terms of passes of 31 yards or more.

    And Jack–look. You;re on a board that values real information. What you’re doing on issues like this instead is subbing personal opinion and speculation for actual information. Well it’s not a good place to do that, because not only can we correct you in an instant, but we kind of resent the mindset that ignores that kind of thing in the first place.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I DO care, in terms of the subject of this thread, about a president making a fundamentally important policy decision that is clouded by his own direct financial conflict of interest.

    Trump sells his stake in Dakota Access Pipeline developer: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trump-sells-stake-dakota-access-193419610.html

    in reply to: Odd Fact #60398
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Yes but what did he mean by, “the game in Afghanistan”?

    Why would you care where it is? At least you know Eric Dickerson won’t be there, wherever it is.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Five Takeaways: Rams 26-10 loss to Patriots

    By Myles Simmons

    http://www.therams.com/news-and-events/article-1/Five-Takeaways-Rams-26-10-loss-to-Patriots/48f62929-03a9-4c25-88bc-9c9ca08e1df6

    After Sunday’s game against the Patriots, the Rams have now dropped three in a row and seven of their last eight. With just the final quarter of the 2016 season to go, here are five takeaways from Week 13.

    1) Poor offensive production

    It’s been an ongoing story for the Rams for a while now, and the lack of offensive production continued on Sunday against the Patriots.

    Los Angeles managed only 162 total yards — 66 of which came on wide receiver Kenny Britt’s reception just after the two-minute warning in the fourth quarter. Los Angeles finished just 1-of-12 in third-down efficiency and had only 36 yards rushing.

    “The elephant in the room is the offense, and I get it,” head coach Jeff Fisher said postgame. “We’re working hard on it, and we’re doing everything we possibly can, and we’ve got to get better.”

    “That’s a great team we played today,” running back Todd Gurley said. “But they’re one of 32 teams just like we are. So that doesn’t make an excuse for us to go out and play like we did.”

    The Rams have scored 10 points or fewer in four of their last five games, and in six of their 12 games overall. L.A. is currently No. 32 scoring just 15.0 points per game. That will have to improve if the Rams are to make a run in the last four games of the season.

    2) Too many offensive errors

    Drops from receivers and an inability to effectively protect the passer were significant factors that limited the Rams’ offensive production. In his third pro start, quarterback Jared Goff completed 14 of his 32 passes for 161 yards, with one touchdown and a pair of interceptions. But both of those turnovers had issues that had to do with more than just the signal-caller.

    On Goff’s first pick, the ball went off the hands of tight end Lance Kendricks and cornerback Maloclm Butler secured it before it hit the ground. On the second, Goff’s arm was hit as he was throwing, which led to the ball floating in the air midfield.

    “Both interceptions, one was the result of a drop and one was the result of bad protection and he got hit and let the ball go,” Fisher said. “So if he’s making a bad decision and hitting a defender in the chest with the ball, then that’s one thing, but you know, he didn’t do that.”

    “I have to look at the tape so I can give you a more realistic evaluation of his play, but Jared Goff wasn’t the reason we lost this football game today,” Fisher continued.

    Going forward, one of the Rams keys will be to limit the negative plays that can pop up during games.

    “We had a lot of errors across the board, really, offensively — myself, everybody really,” Goff said. “Errors, they’re obviously going to happen, you just want to limit them. I mean, when one thing happens, you can’t get down about it. You’re OK, move on.”

    3) Defense limits Patriots scoring opportunities

    Los Angeles’ defense responded after a poor performance against New Orleans with a better showing against New England. The unit surrendered a 43-yard touchdown run to running back LeGarrette Blount on the game’s opening drive, but aside from that held him to just 45 yards on 17 carries.

    Quarterback Tom Brady finished 33-of-46 passing for 269 yards with one touchdown. The Rams effectively pressured Brady a number of times, recording four quarterback hits.

    The pressure came through in particular on third down, as the Patriots finished just 4-of-16 in the category.

    And after New England scored a touchdown off a L.A. turnover with 13:04 in the second quarter, the Rams did not let the Patriots back in the end zone.

    “We held them to four third-down conversions. And that in itself, I think, is respectable,” Fisher said. “But you know he’s going to move the football when you play Tom and this offense, you have to go into it thinking you are going to hold them to field goals. Field goals are a win for your defense. You guys have heard me say that before. And for the most part, we did.”

    4) Robinson returns to lineup

    Left tackle Greg Robinson was inactive against New Orleans in Week 12, but returned to his regular spot on the line for Week 13. Fisher had said he made the decision to deactivate Robinson because the young lineman needed a break after a number of penalties and mental mistakes. Robinson, in turn, said during the week heading into the matchup he tried to make the most of that time.

    “I feel like my focus was just to come out and try my best to put the best performance on film,” Robinson said postgame. “[There were] many things I wish I could get back. But it’s just frustrating that we didn’t come through with the win. Just have to build off that and try to stick it through next week. I feel like we have a good chance.”

    Robinson was flagged for a holding penalty in the third quarter on Sunday. Thirteen penalties have been called against Robinson this season, nine of which have been accepted.

    5) Fisher contract extension

    After Sunday’s game, Fisher confirmed that he had signed a contract extension with the Rams prior to the beginning of the 2016 regular season. Terms of the deal were not disclosed by the team.

    “The discussion started at the end of the year, last year,” Fisher said. “Then they moved into the offseason, so I agreed with the organization well before the season started.”

    “I am expecting to be the coach of the franchise, however, I fully understand that the wins and losses fall on my shoulders,” Fisher added. “That is the fact of our business. And I get that. And as I said, I’m not looking over my shoulder, I’m doing everything I can, on a daily basis, to get this team to win football games.”

    in reply to: Odd Fact #60391
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Get Stan on the phone!

    Stan actually already called US.

    He said, give that PA guy a sideline pass.

    He hung up before I could say well we don’t actually HAVE any sideline passes to give out….

    in reply to: The Rams ban Eric Dickerson from sideline #60387
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Today around the NFL compared to Dickerson, yes, obscurity. There’s also the Offense vs. Defense thing exacerbated by the rules emphasizing offense, fantasy football ignoring defensive players etc.

    The comment said UNTIL Namath and Dickerson brought their teams fame, they were unknown. That’s absolutely not true of the Rams before Dickerson. It’s not even a little true.

    in reply to: Offensive Line #60384
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ut the Rams showed all the signs of being a team on the rise last year. And the defense hasn’t been bad this year. Erratic, maybe. A few bad games. But overall, they seem to have been pretty good. Fewer sacks, fewer turnovers, but in the same ballpark.

    Defense = same system.

    Offense = new system.

    Easier to maintain continuity on defense.

Viewing 30 posts - 36,991 through 37,020 (of 47,808 total)