Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 9,721 through 9,750 (of 12,359 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: the offense is bad because of….? #34778
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Lack of consistent players on the o-line is a major factor, obviously.

    But there’s a lot going on here. It can’t be just ONE thing.

    I dunno how much of this is the OLine Injuries.

    It may very well be that this team could
    have won Ten games if the OLine had stayed healthy
    and gelled. I dunno. Possible. I’m totally open
    to that possibility that the “OLine Injury Theory” (OLIT)
    is the major or total cause of this year’s
    Fiasco (TYF)

    But, I dunno.

    One of the factors that I see, that has nothing
    to do with injuries is Greg Robinson. He
    has not been good. Will he ever be? I dunno.

    Would Foles have been good enough had he not
    be beaten up so much? I dunno. Maybe. But man,
    he sure does look ‘slow’ out there.

    The Receivers have been dropping balls
    in key situations — why ?

    Penalties.

    Missed extra points, field goals.

    Its a spectacle.

    w
    v

    in reply to: the offense is bad because of….? #34762
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The offseason will be interesting.

    w
    v

    This may be the most interesting offseason in 20 years.

    You have all the questions surrounding the QB and the pass offense in general. There are also tough personnel decisions to be made on defense – the contracts of many good players will be up. Can’t resign them all. Which means this will be another critical draft for the defense as well as the offense.

    Then, of course, there’s the move…

    Yeah. We cant even be totally sure Fisher
    will be here next year.

    Free agency will be fascinating. They
    ‘could’ get a lot of cap space, i would think,
    by jettisoning Chris Long, Saffold and Cook.
    Could they find better/healthier replacements
    in free agency?

    I think its impossible to say if Cignetti
    is a good or bad OC at this point. Too soon.

    w
    v

    in reply to: the offense is bad because of….? #34755
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Fisher
    Cignetti
    Young and now injured OL
    QB(s)
    All of the above.
    Can it improve or is it doomed?

    Thats the question of the year.
    Not the entire offense, just the PASS Offense.

    I just dont know.

    Greg Robinson is a problem for one thing.
    But is he a problem because he’s young? Or
    is he a problem because he aint got the
    balance/talent to be an NFL LT ? I dunno.

    Foles is obviously a mess. But why,
    and can he recover and fit in this offense?
    I dunno.

    The injuries are obviously a major problem
    and the offense looked ok against Seattle in
    the first game — but then there was plenty of
    bad offense before the rash of injuries.

    It wont get fixed this year, and they
    might only win a game or two more.

    The offseason will be interesting.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Sanchez looks like a good 3 and out QB #34739
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Johnny Football.
    Maybe they try to add
    Johnny Football to the mix.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Are you enjoying your roast dinosaur? #34729
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    life, evolution, itz all
    fascinating.

    in reply to: Happy Thanksgiving… #34727
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Its all about the Pie
    to me.
    w
    v

    “I celebrated Thanksgiving in an old-fashioned way. I invited everyone in my neighborhood to my house, we had an enormous feast, and then I killed them and took their land.”
    — Jon Stewart

    in reply to: The sudden right wing adoration of the French #34717
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: do you give the Rams a chance against the Bengals? #34714
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Slight chance of a win, but only if Quinn
    is a hundred percent. They would have
    to win it on Defense, and without Quinn
    the D aint scary enough.

    I’m assuming Quinn is not going to be
    a hundred percent the rest of the year,
    so, thus, consequently:

    Rams 5
    Bengals 20

    w
    v

    Did you watch the last game? Just curious.

    Oh and btw, you’re right, cranberry/walnut bread toast is great.

    .

    ————————-

    No, I cant watch this offense anymore.
    Honestly, its simply un-watch-able for me.

    There are things that should never be seen.
    Things too dark,
    too evil.

    Don’t watch,
    or you’ll be sorry.

    w
    v

    in reply to: happy birthday SDRam #34710
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Happy Birth Day, SD.

    w
    v

    in reply to: 1999 St. Louis Rams Training Camp vid with John Clayton #34709
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    That was cool.

    Defense was 10th and offense 27th in 98.

    Similar to this year.

    Now all Snisher has to do
    is find a Pace, Timmerman, Faulk, Warner/Green, Ike, and Holt.
    And maybe an Ernie.

    No problem.

    …as I recall there were zero OLine injuries
    in 99.

    w
    v

    in reply to: do you give the Rams a chance against the Bengals? #34708
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Slight chance of a win, but only if Quinn
    is a hundred percent. They would have
    to win it on Defense, and without Quinn
    the D aint scary enough.

    I’m assuming Quinn is not going to be
    a hundred percent the rest of the year,
    so, thus, consequently:

    Rams 5
    Bengals 20

    w
    v

    in reply to: Saffold and Robinson #34658
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    i’d give him one more year. that’s it.

    Sure, but if a stud LT falls to them in the draft
    do you take him?

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    On Martz: “two hours of homework every night”

    w
    v

    in reply to: Saffold and Robinson #34653
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah, I’ve thought about that I think GR
    might very well belong at guard. I dunno.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Keenum– concussion #34607
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Fisher is certainly having his worst week since he’s been HC of the Rams. He’s under fire for keeping Keenum in the game…

    http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2015/11/23/9782026/st-louis-rams-jeff-fisher-case-keenum-concussion

    Enh. I think Fisher has a long record of handling
    injured players pretty carefully. Seems like he
    always brings them along slowly and gives them
    plenty of time to recover.

    This situation is easy to second-guess after
    slow motion replays etc. I just dont
    put this on Fisher.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams 11th in draft order now #34605
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yes. With Mannion, the smartest QB in the room.
    One more year for Oline and a good draft. Even Fisher can get 10 wins.

    I would like to see some Mannion
    in the last month of the season.

    I mean, why not? I’m not saying
    they should get him all bulgerized
    but let him play some — give it to Gurley,
    throw quick passes, that sort of thing.
    Get him some experience. Its too early
    to do it now, cause they aint gonna admit
    the season is over, but maybe in the
    last month or so.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams 11th in draft order now #34595
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>Coaches always believe that they can coach them up.</span>

    Do you think
    this team is “close”
    to being a double-digit winner?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams 11th in draft order now #34593
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Is it sad to say that the highlight of football season for me these days is the off-season?

    If Fisher is back, i wonder if he will feel pressure
    to draft players who are ‘game-ready’ instead
    of raw players with high-ceilings?

    I am ready for some game-ready players.
    Ya know.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Pathetic (post-Ravens game thread) #34592
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    To me there’s no doubt. Had Foles not melted down and the OL not been so injury wracked, they would have been fine.

    Well, we’ll never know ; the injuries
    wrecked any chance they would have had…but
    I dunno.

    My own thing iz, I cant quite figure out
    what is:
    1) Fisher
    2) and what is injuries.

    Could be they would have been double-digit
    winners without the injuries.
    Though, maybe Foles was too flawed, and Fisher
    sucks in regard to offense. I am not sure
    anymore.

    Either way, whether its key-injuries or Fisher
    or both — This is the most disappointing year
    for me, since the year the Rams crashed and
    burned the year after they met the 49ers in the playoffs.
    89? 90? somethin like that.

    It would not surprise me if they
    beat the bengals btw. They’ll get a few
    more ugly wins, I would think. Gurley
    will have a few more good games,
    and some turnovers will go their
    way. Enh.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Keenum– concussion #34583
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Sure made wonder how they have the spotter do his/her job. Does this person sit up in a booth with binoculars? Are they on the sideline? There was a Rams game early in the season where a timeout was called by the ATC spotter and to me the injury was far less obvious. It’s a big area that the spotter has to cover with his or her eyes. So I can see how some instances could go unnoticed. Having the benefit of a tv camera pointed right at Keenum made yesterday’s example obvious for viewers. Still, given Case’s reaction it’s surprising that he stayed out there, or was allowed to stay out there.

    Was it Greg Robinson the pass-rusher zoomed past?
    Or was it someone else who got Keenum’s brain scrambled?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Pathetic (post-Ravens game thread) #34582
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    For me, This is the most disappointing year,
    in the last decade or so.

    Have we hit bottom yet? Is this
    bottom ?

    w
    v

    Disappointing losses are starting to bleed together for me. Hard to distinguish among them. This team leads the league in disappointing losses.

    ——————————

    This year is different for me. I was
    really expecting a great defense,
    excellent special teams, and an offense
    that started slow, but got better
    as the year sent along.
    I expected Foles to be a
    clutch gamer, who managed
    a strong short-pass-game and
    hit big plays, enough to win.
    I expected big things from Stedman.
    I expected more from Britt.
    I expected more from Greg Robinson.

    I dunno. I know the injuries to Q
    and Long have hurt the D,
    and the OLine has once again
    been decimated, so maybe the
    team would have come on, had
    there not been injuries. Sigh.
    Maybe.

    But Fisher just aint growin on me.
    I hate the idea of starting over with
    a new system, but I also dont much
    like the idea of year FIVE with Fisher.

    I just know i cant even stand to WATCH
    this offense. I cant even watch it.
    Its unwatchable for ‘me.’

    I was expecting ten wins. What will
    they end up with now?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Pathetic (post-Ravens game thread) #34580
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    For me, This is the most disappointing year,
    in the last decade or so.

    Have we hit bottom yet? Is this
    bottom ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Quinn out #34499
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yup.

    The National media keeps talking about this game
    by pointing out the Rams strong Defense,
    but they haven’t been factoring in
    the Q-factor. It simply AINT
    the Ram Defense without Q,
    or with a damaged-Q.

    They need a Max-Q
    to be a max-Q defense.
    They cant have a min-Q
    or no-Q.

    This is all advanced algebra,
    people.

    D – Q = L

    Even if you use Quantum-Kabbalistic-Algebra, and subtract
    Foles and add in Keenum, its still
    a loss: D – (Q-F) + K = L

    w
    v

    in reply to: Tweets 11/20 & injury reports #34466
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    You need six weeks to come back from
    a broken bone?

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat the Ravens? #34460
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yes, well, had your original post said “earth” foxes, then I would known what you were talking about. But it didn’t say that, it said “ground” foxes.

    I think that was intentional. An intentional ground, if you will.

    Let the Admins deal with you as they will.

    —————————–

    You do know what a group of Ravens
    is called…

    http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_a_group_of_ravens_called

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: poll question #34458
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    six

    in reply to: 101, 11/19 … Adam Caplan #34449
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Caplan is not impressed with Mr Foles
    or the Rams offensive players.

    w
    v

    in reply to: keenum's 2014 numbers #34423
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Not many yards rushing.
    He’s no Russell Wilson.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat the Ravens? #34420
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    What the heck are ground-foxes? In relation to air-foxes and/or sea-foxes?

    Enny-hew, I’m sorta agreeing with you on this one. Can’t make any more positive predictions with this team. Not even sure Super-Gurley and Ghost-Of-Welker can help these schizos…

    ————————–

    Q: A group of foxes is called a ?

    A: http://www.ask.com/pets-animals/group-foxes-called-51593f3cb63ae3b2

    Cook said, that prior to the Bears game,
    the team decided it was going to “start a new season.”

    So they are really just 0 and 1.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat the Ravens? #34418
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Ravens 24
    Rams 8

    I have lost faith.

    w
    v
    —————————
    “He walked out in the gray light and stood and he saw for a brief moment the absolute truth of the world. The cold relentless circling of the intestate earth. Darkness implacable. The blind dogs of the sun in their running. The crushing black vacuum of the universe. And somewhere two hunted animals trembling like ground-foxes in their cover. Borrowed time and borrowed world and borrowed eyes with which to sorrow it.”
    ― Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Viewing 30 posts - 9,721 through 9,750 (of 12,359 total)