Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 4,891 through 4,920 (of 7,335 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Goff? Miami? #58200
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    just my opinion. but fisher’s wrong.

    in reply to: board reactions, JETS game #58143
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Back in the playoff hunt – kinda, sorta.

    So, does Keenum start next week?

    Not my QB. LOL

    ……….

    bwahahaha!

    awesome.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: informal poll…do the Jets even stand a chance? #58100
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    petty is starting.

    yes. i don’t know how good the source is but reports are that fisher is ready to start Goff at some point.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    glazer just reported that fisher is considering starting goff NEXT week depending on how they do today.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58006
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    “We’re not going to be involved in government,” Trump Jr told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos in September on Good Morning America. “He wants nothing to do with [the company]. He wants to fix this country.”

    oh, dear.

    we won’t get fooled again?

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #57995
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    is the democratic party capable of that kind of change?

    this all reminds me of that who song.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Colbert on the election results #57980
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Interesting thoughts, Invader. I will mull them over.

    Btw you said everyone on the board is ‘a decent human being’ — you are not including Zooey in that are you?

    w
    v

    haha. except for zooey. he is pure evil. his heart is dark and cold.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i would want goff starting half this season. now maybe he’s not ready to start. and if that’s the case then that worries me.

    but maybe fisher is a little more conservative. or maybe i’m too impatient. or they’re just different approaches.

    but still. i’d like to see him get at least 8 games.

    and not cuz i think he’d make a difference but to start preparing for next year.

    in reply to: Colbert on the election results #57973
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    or i should say rather on ALL sides.

    ha!

    in reply to: Colbert on the election results #57971
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yes. many many different sides.

    ———–

    You dont get into long hostile fights with politically-different-posters, Invader.

    Care to share your approach? Or your purpose in posting pol-thots?

    w
    v

    my approach. i just try to go in with an open mind. i think the reasons everyone here is upset actually overlap in some places. and there are wide chasms in others. i guess i am not willing to stubbornly cling to my own ideas. more just curious as to why people believe what they believe? i guess ultimately. on a philosophical level we’re all just completely lost. we have our own belief systems. we have our own experiences that have shaped us, and i just sit here in wonderment at all the different opinions being put out here on this board. cuz i believe everyone here is decent (or at least decent as a human can be). i believe that on some level all the pain here and frustration is born out of caring. even if that can often be misguided.

    and even if it does come from a place of hate. for some reason i’m ok with that too.

    don’t ask me why. i don’t know. i can’t really explain it, and maybe it doesn’t even make any sense. maybe it’s cuz in the end i think that none of this even means anything.

    i do know that people in general are hurting on both sides. just want to see where all that hurt is coming from. on both sides.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Wentz, qb rating. Games 1-8.

    1. W, qb rating 101.0
    2. W, qb rating 86.6
    3. W, qb rating 125.9
    4. L, qb rating 102.8

    5. L, qb rating 77.7
    6. W, qb rating 52.4
    7. L, qb rating 91.4
    8. L, qb rating 64.5

    definitely up and down, but he hasn’t looked in over his head. and he’s learning. goff is 2 years younger and less experienced. so you gotta figure his learning curve is a little steeper.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah i don’t think it boils down to 2 possibilities, but nonetheless i’m starting to think the problem lies with one or the other or possibly even both. now many different factors can go into that. also. i could be wrong and neither is the problem, and there would be all sorts of reasons for that.

    but yeah. now i’m in worry mode until goff gets his shot.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: PFF on Donald…the praise continues #57960
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i can only imagine how donald would look with a healthy quinn.

    in reply to: California wants to secede from the union? #57959
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Then you can raise a glass of piss and toast togetherness.

    i gotta admit that made me laugh.

    good to have a bunch of different voices. especially ones with a pretty gnarly sense of humor.

    in reply to: Colbert on the election results #57958
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yes. many many different sides.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    my confidence is eroding. if not in goff then in fisher.

    this is beginning to be a bunch of bullshit.

    I don’t buy the stuff they’re peddling there, IR.

    Just my 2 cents.

    well. we’ll see.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    my confidence is eroding. if not in goff then in fisher.

    this is beginning to be a bunch of bullshit.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Anti-Trump protests ARE peaceful and organic. #57852
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i am ok with protesting trump. but how about protesting the democrats too? how about telling them they need to get a better candidate than hillary clinton?

    i almost feel like this plays into their hands.

    we’ll watch the country fall apart the next 4 years, and the democrats will be smiling and say, “hey. don’t worry. come back with us. we’ll take care of it…”

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    they should do it like soccer. no time stoppage. no timeouts. just let the clock roll. 2 halves.

    in reply to: Quarterback controversy in L.A. is nothing new for the Rams #57779
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i know i said this before, but yeah. the calls for goff were loud. i went and saw the game on tv. the tv guys talked about it, but you couldn’t really hear it on tv the way it sounded live.

    people want change…………….

    hahahaha!

    in reply to: Election fraud ? #57777
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i listened to the beginning. basically says that a lot of states were eliminating minority votes based only on first and last names – nevermind the fact that they had different middle names and different social security numbers.

    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57716
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    in my opinion. he did more than that.

    Like what? I’m not doubting you. Maybe I’m conveniently forgetting the hate-filled pejoratives he used to describe her as a human being.

    i’m not talking about trashing hillary.

    i’m talking about the manipulation of people’s fears.

    it’s been hashed over again and again. so i don’t want to go over it another time.

    i think hillary did similar things. i don’t like how her campaign seemed to center around don’t vote for trump or you’re a racist homophobic ass hole. i think it turned a lot of people off.

    i wonder how bernie would have handled it. i don’t think he would have handled it the same way. i hope not.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57710
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    But he did label her as corrupt and a crook.

    in my opinion. he did more than that.

    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57708
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    And so I find that we have descended and degenerated, from some far ancestor (some microscopic atom wandering at its pleasure between the mighty horizons of a drop of water perchance) insect by insect, animal by animal, reptile by reptile, down the long highway of smirchless innocence, till we have reached the bottom stage of development–nameable as the Human Being. Below us–nothing. Nothing but the Frenchman.

    ja.

    now i’m going to crawl into a hole for the next four years.

    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57698
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    He’s not. It’s a manipulation of people’s emotions perpetrated by the left.

    and you don’t think trump did that too?

    i agree clinton engaged in her own fear mongering too. which is one reason i dislike her.

    but i also dislike trump for the same reasons.

    i just don’t see it getting better for the people trump claims he’s fighting for.

    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57686
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    And if even one illegal immigrant murdered or raped a woman (and one did), then he’s not incorrect.

    there’s just something so wrong with that statement.

    he was fear mongering. that’s the way i saw it.

    plain and simple. to me.

    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57681
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    my guess is as the population increases the need for hierarchy increases.

    That would assume that human beings are wired to have a need for hierarchy.

    If you look at history and anthropology combined, human beings are not wired either for or against social hierarchy. That is you can find examples of everything. If you measure human beings by looking at examples of the kinds of social systems they construct, then, we have done absolutely everything.

    In fact what you find about human social hard wiring by looking at examples across space and throughout time is that other than being social animals, we are actually not hard-wired for any one particular way of doing things. We contain endless possibilities that way.

    Given that, there’s no reason to assume that population increases lead to a need for hierarchy.

    As a rule, though, people tend to desire hiearchy the more they base ideas about social order on fear.

    Real or imagined fears.

    I agree with most of that.

    More and more recent studies are actually showing humans are hard-wired for cooperation and empathy, and desire equality. Several recent studies deal with very young kids, most of whom actually get upset when food and toys are not distributed equally. It actually ticks them off, and the studies show they’d rather get rid of extra food and toys than have one kid receive more than the others. There appears to be a bias in favor of equality.

    And those kids are saying this about their peers. It’s not just them demanding they receive as much as the other kids. It’s them saying it’s wrong that the other kids receive less, etc.

    To me, the evidence points to this: Cooperation, empathy and the desire for equality are beaten out of us over time. These things are replaced by artificial calls to competition, aggression, inequality, indifference, etc. etc.

    Yes, there has always been a small percentage that comes into the game already with close to sociopathic ways. But the vast majority of humans are taught to be selfish shits. Most humans aren’t born that way.

    how do we not know those kids are sharing because of learned behavior though? i’m always suspicious of those kinds of studies. too much bias inherent in those studies. humans will always see what they want to see.

    of course i could just be seeing what i want to see, so i concede i could be dead wrong about this.

    humans love to teach their own to be sharing and to be compassionate with each other. but when it comes to others we are taught to be fearful and guarded.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57670
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    If you measure human beings by looking at examples of the kinds of social systems they construct, then, we have done absolutely everything.

    that is true too. and even now you can find examples of more egalitarian societies.

    not completely egalitarian. but yeah.

    but i also don’t look at it as just certain segments but at the planet as a whole.

    but yeah. i’m making a BIG assumption that we are hard wired to need hierarchy.

    that’s just my negativity talking right now.

    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57665
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    As a rule, though, people tend to desire hiearchy the more they base ideas about social order on fear.

    Real or imagined fears.

    that’s kinda what i’m trying to get at.

    our shit’s emotional.

    ya know. i’m just really down right now too.

    and half of what i’m saying is born out of frustration.

    but hey. forgive me. i’m human.

    nyuk nyuk.

    in reply to: Looking for SOMETHING positive #57659
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    His list of potential cabinet appointees include women, gays, and blacks. So much for being a racist, or homophobic, or a misogynist. And please. You can’t honestly believe that Killory is THAT stupid that she didn’t understand the lucid instructions given to her about the handling of classified information. Careless? lol. Intentionally defiant would be a more apt description. Let alone lying about it. Let alone allowing someone without security clearance (her maid) print out and view classified materials. And yes, that falls under the category of traitorism.

    personally i don’t think he’s a racist.

    i think he’s an elitist. and that’s more scary to me.

    but that’s just me.

    and we mean nothing to a man like him.

Viewing 30 posts - 4,891 through 4,920 (of 7,335 total)