Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ZooeyModerator================
Trump has been out front in promoting women and minorities yet he’s constantly called a racist. Thats why.
Oh, for chrissakes. He has said that the Mexicans coming here are the worst society has to offer. “When Mexico sends you its people, they’re not sending their best…They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.”
Never mind that Mexico isn’t “sending” anybody, that statement is appalling, and there is no way to get out of the fact that it is racist. And inflammatory.
He wants to ban ALL Muslims from coming to the US. There are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world, and estimates are that 70,000 – 100,000 of them support ISIS. That is racist.
So he employs some Latinos.
That’s supposed to exonerate him from charges of racism?
Hell, plenty of plantation owners employed black people after the Civil War.
ZooeyModeratorIt’s out.
I didn’t see that. Thanks. Will be interesting if there’s some reports on the content of those e-mails.
Comey’s commentary was strange. He says there isn’t anything but careless handling of the server, but the law seems to include that as a means to prosecute. Think the Hillary/Bill hit man team had any pressure on Comey? I’m being somewhat facetious, but Comey probably knows more about that history than we do. He just sounded conflicted, maybe he was told to stop the process?It is easy to imagine, given what we know about Dick Cheney and other White House operatives applying thumb screws across the street to get what they wanted when they fabricated reasons for the Iraq War. Applying pressure is what these guys do. The Clintons didn’t get where they are without some arm-twisting along the way.
ZooeyModeratorThe best gift ever to the Trump campaign. The hypocrisy of the insider for all to see. And it is so easy to see. Trump will ride this latest outrage to victory.
I hear that Wikileaks says they will soon have a major release regarding Hillary and the e-mails.
The bomb could fall yet. If so, that would be especially bad for the Dems if release after the convention.It’s out.
Published yesterday. 1,258 new emails.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/286444-wikileaks-publishes-clinton-war-emails
Assange says there is enough to prosecute, but expressed his belief Clinton wouldn’t be prosecuted. And either the FBI has already seen these emails, or they have a new investigation on their hands which will take a few more months to investigate. I haven’t heard anything about the ramifications of this yet.
ZooeyModeratorThis topic was modified 1 hour, 3 minutes ago by Zooey Zooey. Reason: Expanded from one paragraph, to a whole bloody section
And yet, somehow, it didn’t “edit” so much as initiate a fresh post. I blame the Tea Party.
ZooeyModeratorI think an indictment after the convention would have been much more beneficial . Anyone not against Hillary at this point is not likely to be swayed by this.Clinton is crushing the Tiny fingered Cheetos faced Ferret wearing Shitgibbon in the poles and will simply manufacture any additional votes needed.Basically it all boils down to we’re fucked.
Yeah, I don’t think Trump gets a boost out of this because all the people who have already convicted Hillary in their minds have already convicted Hillary, and this makes no difference. The independents are more likely to see this from the point of view of “just another example of the right wing making a scandal out of nothing” than as evidence of Hillary’s hypocrisy.
And we are screwed.
Really, it’s Hillary (Nero) staying the course while Rome burns, or Trump (Caligula), a narcissist governed by erratic impulses.
July 5, 2016 at 11:03 am in reply to: Media Silent as Concealed Carrier Stops Mass Shooting in Progress at a South Car #47904
ZooeyModeratorConfirmation Bias.
No. Matter. What.
And I don’t think the media was silent on this story. BNW saw it, and I also saw it earlier in the day. So it was out there. It just isn’t actually that big of a story. 3 people shot. Happens multiple times every day. The fact it wasn’t a Big Story isn’t censorship. It’s not a Big Story.
It is only the spin on the story that matters to NRA folks. The thing is, even if the spin is accepted (concealed carry stopped a violent situation from getting worse), it doesn’t “win” the argument. Especially when statistically this kind of incident is insignificant compared to Concealed Carry Gone Awry – which happens FAR more often.
But.
Confirmation Bias. It doesn’t matter. It isn’t a debate. It’s posturing.
ZooeyModeratorI’m no longer voting for the lesser of two evils. I see the logic behind it but ultimately it results in no progress being made towards the type of country I want.
Just tossing in my pennies to the informal poll.
Everyone has to decide for themselves and I don’t figure I will persuade anyone.
But my thinking is, it’s NOW and the prospect of Trump, who really is worse, in there nominating SC and federal judges (among other things) is positively dystopian. I’ve seen worse and worse is worse (Maine had a 3 candidate governors race and a Trump-style guy won with 37% of the vote. People I know said enh, what harm can he do…and, he then showed them what harm he can do).
I will register third party after the election.
Not the kind of thing I want to fight about because no one will convince anyone and no one has to justify their choice.
That’s my motto. Worse IS worse.
….
I watched a 5-minute video on that guy, your governor. There is no denying that he is a colossal dickhead. Just an ignorant, selfish, boorish, POS. When do you get rid of him?
ZooeyModeratorEither one will cause the country to wake up the morning after with contempt of the new president in full glow. Both of these candidates are widely reviled. So the onslaught of negativity and derision will start before the inauguration. The next four years are going to be ugly.
Either one is likely to be a one-term president (if the opposition party can put up a decent candidate…I mean, let’s not forget, as awful as Trump is considered to be even within the Republican party, voters thought Carson, Fiorina, Cruz, Rubio, and Bush were WORSE!).
As far as what Trump will do, nobody knows. I don’t even think Trump really knows. You know, I actually have read quite a bit about Narcissistic Personality Disorder (because a couple of family members have it), and one odd thing about narcissists is that they believe whatever they are saying at the time they say it, even if it completely contradicts something they said (and believed) at an earlier time. And they can change up again completely in the future. They also have a stronger than average tendency to rationalize whatever they want at the moment. They are much more governed by their emotional needs than by intellectual principles. They bend principles at will to match their current emotional condition.
That’s what we will get with Trump. He will be a crapshoot every single day.
He may or may not support TPP. If he had a personal business interest in it, we could predict he would do whatever benefits him most. But his business interests aren’t really involved in “trade,” afaik. But he has stated he is opposed to it, and I imagine that is mostly due to his essentially self-centered anti-foreigner feelings, and those appear to be a constant in his life. So he will probably be opposed to that since it doesn’t benefit him directly, and he is inclined against foreigners. But, again, his “Rasputin” is going to be as important to his presidency as he is. Who is going to be his chief adviser? And how much is he going to listen to him?
The one thing you can count on with Trump is he will do whatever HE wants. In spite of his populist rhetoric, he does not give a shit about anybody else. It will be Trumpmerica. And since his interests are not the interests of the 99%, anything he does that benefits average Americans will be by accident, not principle.
ZooeyModeratorNo. I’m voting for Jill Stein (again).
Both Clinton and Trump, ultimately, are this guy:

Hillary might be Nero but Trump strikes me more the Caligula type.

Good observation.
That’s what we have: Nero or Caligula.
ZooeyModeratorNo. I’m voting for Jill Stein (again).
Both Clinton and Trump, ultimately, are this guy:

ZooeyModeratorFirst off, i didnt even know Pat Buchannon was still alive

Second, i think this ‘free trade / globalization’ issue or cluster of issues is one of the most important topics of our times here on Earth.
I would have loved to see Trump and Sanders have a conversation about it. I’d like to know where they agree and disagree on it.
I like the fact Trump is against the Nafta/WTO stuff. Its why he’s such a wild-card. I cant stand a lot of his ideas…but this Nafta thing is HUGE. It’s what makes me think about the surreal notion that i might prefer Trump to Hillary (which isn’t saying much, but still)
Thing is, i dont agree with his “patriotism” mentality. I dont wanna care more about one human being than another. An american life is not more valuable than a chinese life or a mexican life, or a north korean life or an Iranian life. …Cant we have policies that are good for all-lives ? Yes? No?
w
v
“You’ll never have a quiet world till you knock the patriotism out of the human race. ”
(1919) GB ShawYes, Trump is tempting on trade.
And he has zero chance of building a wall or deporting 11 million humans.
But I cannot have him appointing justices. He has already said he would appoint justices who would restrict liberties. He has said he will appoint justices who are anti-abortion. And he could appoint up to 3 more justices, and roll in right wing authoritarianism for a generation. Trump is no libertarian. He’s an authoritarian.
ZooeyModeratorOK, I apologize.
Thanks.
ZooeyModeratorThere is no shame in being totally ugly nowadays. I think that has changed. I think society used to bite its lip a bit before saying ugly things. The fault lines were there, maybe the contempt. But it wasn’t said out loud in polite company.
It IS said out loud now. It’s almost a matter of PRIDE to say ugly things now. A bravado that is commonly mistaken for bravery.
And we have congress flat out refusing to do its job, and unabashedly saying things that are demonstrably false.
I heard on the radio this morning a couple of hosts talking about a guy who accosted Izzy Azalea – whoever that is – at an airport terminal. He approached her (him? Her, I think) and recorded the encounter, asking, “Are you Izzie Azalea?” and she said, “Yes, I am,” or something in a polite and friendly way, and he says, “How does it feel to have single-handedly ruined hip-hop?”
Paraphrasing.
And I thought, “What kind of dick would do something like that?” And he must have been so proud of himself that he uploaded it, or these DJs wouldn’t have known, right? So we live in an era when being a dickhead is actually admired.
Do you feel the same about protesters who go into the Trump rally to disrupt it for their own political end? Outside fine but inside no. But wait he’s male, white, rich, heterosexual and republican. Never mind.
Hey, don’t insult me, okay?
I think silent protest is okay. I think counter-demonstrations/rallies are okay. I think disrupting a rally is rude, including disrupting a Trump rally. I think initiating conflict is counter-productive in its own right.
ZooeyModeratorThere is no shame in being totally ugly nowadays. I think that has changed. I think society used to bite its lip a bit before saying ugly things. The fault lines were there, maybe the contempt. But it wasn’t said out loud in polite company.
It IS said out loud now. It’s almost a matter of PRIDE to say ugly things now. A bravado that is commonly mistaken for bravery.
And we have congress flat out refusing to do its job, and unabashedly saying things that are demonstrably false.
I heard on the radio this morning a couple of hosts talking about a guy who accosted Izzy Azalea – whoever that is – at an airport terminal. He approached her (him? Her, I think) and recorded the encounter, asking, “Are you Izzie Azalea?” and she said, “Yes, I am,” or something in a polite and friendly way, and he says, “How does it feel to have single-handedly ruined hip-hop?”
Paraphrasing.
And I thought, “What kind of dick would do something like that?” And he must have been so proud of himself that he uploaded it, or these DJs wouldn’t have known, right? So we live in an era when being a dickhead is actually admired.
ZooeyModeratorI would love her to get up to 15% so she could get into the debates.
Why would democrats and republicans let anyone else in their debate? Thats why they took it from the League of Women Voters in 2000 to keep Nader and Buchanan from debating with Bush and Gore. If anything has changed it is news to me.
To be eligible, a candidate must poll a minimum of 15% in 5 national polls.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_on_Presidential_Debates
ZooeyModeratorI would love her to get up to 15% so she could get into the debates.
ZooeyModeratorApparently what they found was that nothing really worked, and that’s why they dropped it?
ZooeyModerator=============
That was like a who’s-who of evil, lining
up for her.Man, they like her more than i thought, too.
“the warrior queen”
Lord.
w
vYes. She has the full support of the Death Eaters. Not their grudging support. They like her.
It’s interesting. They all kind of implied they had to get over the – D behind her name, but when they looked at what she actually fights for, it’s all the good stuff in the world: blowing up Iran, bulldozing over Palestinians, assassinating people, toppling governments…you just have to love her!
ZooeyModeratorFor better or for worse we are a country of wolves-at least in the economic sense. It is the price we pay for what we perceive as “freedom”
This is where we disagree. Like all countries our country is a country of policies. It is true that the wolf-friendly have control of the policies. But there are countries with very different or even opposite policies which have as much freedom as we do, if not more.
But I think the sheer size of our country, the huge divergence of interests, the number of people living here, the enormous assimilation of varying cultures and immigrants makes it difficult to compare the United States with other countries
W to be honest I don’t buy that. I think it;s an excuse to naturalize the status quo.
…
I disagree. Monocultures like Japan cannot correlate to the US or UK or France.
And…where did you get the idea that Japan is a “monoculture?”
ZooeyModeratorhttp://www.pressreader.com/usa/los-angeles-times/20160629/281513635463127
Justice Scalia rolling over in his grave as I type this.
Another piece by professor Chemerinsky on the same issue.
He’s not rolling over in his grave.
He’s rotating.
The liberals who murdered him put him on a spit, and buried him in a grill.
ZooeyModeratorI like Ike for all the reasons you mention, although I must throw in that he didn’t resist McCarthy until McCarthy started going for people in the Pentagon.
FDR for me. He had flaws, too, but certainly made a lot of progress, and had the country headed in the right direction.
ZooeyModeratorI suppose when it comes to politics and religion we all become “dogmatic”. Nevertheless, I genuinely believe that those on the “left” and those on the “right” tend to follow what has been called a process of “group think”. Meaning there is a far greater consensus on political issues than one might find in a group of so called centrists. At it’s worst there can be the “let me know what my group thinks of this so I can be consistent and won’t ruffle the feathers of those I know”. By definition a “moderate” or “centrist” does not have a “group” to measure his views on issues. I suspect when it comes to abortion rights, affirmative action, gun control, etc there is far more divergence among moderates than you would find on the “left” and the “right”, especially as one approaches the polar ends of both these bodies.
As far as “socialism” goes-your right it’s far more complicated than what we give it. Growing up in the 50s words like “communism”, “socialism” were dirty words that few of us knew anything about other than these were the bad guys. Today with globalization we see bits and pieces of socialism everywhere including here in the U.S. The word doesn’t carry with it the stigma it once did-although talking to some of my friends my age you wouldn’t know that.
My problem with it is the ideology not the end game. To me the weakness in the system is in the “planners”. A collectivist planned economy means there must be central planners. And the only way that will work is if there is total commitment to the “plan”. And how does that exactly work in a society of free people. What do you do with the dissenters or those who disagree? Who will choose the planners and what plans take priority when there are competing legitimate interests? Who will make these decisions. And those dissenters cannot get in the way if the system is to work. Would there be debate or would that be looked upon as subversion? Would dissenters be eliminated? (not an entirely shocking expectation) Somewhere I read that collectivism and individualism are political oil and water.==============
Agreed. Preachin to the choir comrad

w
vI don’t agree at all, particularly with the first paragraph, but I’m not going to argue it.
ZooeyModeratorI think you have a bit of a blind-spot when it comes to this “leftists are dogmatic” thing. Just because we dont agree with what YOU call ‘moderate dems’ or ‘moderate reps’ doesn’t make us ‘dogmatic’ — it just mean we disagree totally, and completely with Dems and Reps on some very fundamental policies. THEY disagree with us too — why dont you call the ‘moderates’ dogmatic ?
w
vWell, he is in a minority on this board, and probably feels besieged every time he posts politics here. I think Waterfield is as honest in his views as can be reasonably expected of humans, and he practices what he preaches by working with charities and fundraisers and neighborhood/community building stuff. It must be a little odd to him to step into this particular corner of the world and find his politics criticized by a tag team of leftists.
ZooeyModeratorI saw three clips of West at the platform committee, and I was very impressed. His explanation of why he was abstaining on the vote to approve the platform was just the way Robin described him. “He looks directly in the eye of power, and without flinching, and without hate, stares it down and speaks the truth.”
ZooeyModerator. I don’t know how feminists don’t see this.
Well partly that because there’s no such thing as A feminist, there are different feminISMs and they are debating this stuff…the existence of that debate just doesn’t make the mainstream. Your article is a good example of that very debate. The woman who wrote it is a feminist…just not a mainstream feminist. She identifies as a socialist feminist, hence the critique.
…..
Yeah, of course, but isn’t it strange that NOBODY ever said this with a mic turned on? Nobody offered a feminist critique of Hillary? Like I said, this just seemed so obvious to me, and yet I have heard one intelligent woman after another get all giddy about the prospect of a woman president with seemingly no regard for how her policy positions impact women. I have to admit, I did a bit of a spit take when Gloria Steinem endorsed Clinton. I know Susan Sarandon had harsh words for Hillary, but she didn’t frame those as feminist issues. Same with Sarah Silverman. Liza Featherstone is the first woman I’ve heard/read who has pointed out that social policy matters more to the status of women in society than the fact that glass ceilings are breaking.
ZooeyModeratorWarren is my hope for 2020.
ZooeyModeratorRobert Kagan is hosting a find raiser for her, Waterfield. He is a co-founder of PNAC, the ideological foundation of neo – conservatism. And I just want to clarify that my personal dislike for Clinton will not be a factor in how I will vote. You asked a question, and I answered it.
ZooeyModeratorI will tell you what pisses me off about Hillary. She professes to represent me, and she doesn’t. I hate her foreign policy, and most of her domestic positions. Yet she tells me she represents me, and she (and her supporters) often are condescending and patronizing to my beliefs, and she tells me that I “need” to support her.
Trump doesn’t claim to represent me, so while I can’t stand the guy, he hasn’t insulted me and told me to grow up. So that’s why I “personally” dislike Clinton more than Trump. I feel insulted by her, patronized like a child, and taken for granted as a supporter.
And…she is no moderate. She has Neo-Cons supporting her. Neo-Cons. The PNAC people. Those are anti-democracy imperialists. She is philosophically aligned with George W. Bush. And purporting to represent me. It makes steam come out my ears, I will tell you.
ZooeyModeratorScrew George Will.
Vonnegut once called him an A+ student. And that’s about right. He organizes his thoughts, and writes articulately, and honestly gathers his facts, and there is nowhere you can mark him down in his essay. He gets an A+.
He is also full of shit from cap a pied, but you can’t mark down his grade for that.
-
AuthorPosts

