Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ZooeyModeratorDidn’t he miss a full season? Was that the shoulder?
I was surprised he was in the league this long. Seems like just a couple years ago he was the hot, young prospect out of Stanford.
Goff’s heading into season 4 already. Time flies, etc.
I wonder if Luck might be one of those guys who tries a comeback after a year.
ZooeyModeratorNot only do atheists die earlier, they also don’t get to go to heaven.
ZooeyModeratorI think about 20 teams can win it. Its the NFL.
Best case scenario though, is, Rams vs Saints for the NFC Championship. Rams leading by two points with 20 seconds to go. Saints have the ball on their 35. Fourth down. Breez makes a perfect throw deep downfield, and Robey-Coleman breaks it up but gets called for P.I.
And of course. The call is overturned. By the new replay rule. Rams win.
w
vYa know, I have had a similar vision. But in mine, the Rams are driving to seal the game late, and there is a No Call against the Saints for P.I. McVay challenges the call, and it’s ruled Pass Interference. Rams 1st down. Game over.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorHunh.
He forgot to put the Rams in the top 5.
That was pretty careless of him.
…
It’s just the way it is ever since the Rams left the glamour of St. Louis.
August 21, 2019 at 7:49 pm in reply to: texts between Oregon police and far-right group prompt investigation #104183
ZooeyModeratorI don’t suppose anybody in this country would ever think of holding a conversation about “What Personality Types are Attracted to Police Work in the First Place?” and “Is That a Good Thing?”
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
August 8, 2019 at 10:53 pm in reply to: Lawsuit Over Blown Call In NFC Title Game Forces Saints To Side With The NFL #103781
ZooeyModeratorHas the statute of limitations run out on the Tom Mack call?
Cuz, if we not, we should sue.
We should sue anyway. Just on the principle.
w
vI have to say…
I am GLAD that now, as a Rams fan, I am in a position to say to another team’s fans…”F you.”
Go forth and suffer.
Been there, done that.
ZooeyModeratorLook…Bernie….
ZooeyModeratorGood point. Thanks. I wasn’t even thinking in terms of positive/negative characteristics. At least not consciously.
ZooeyModeratorWebb, Walter Prescott. “Ended: 400 Year Boom. Reflections on the Age of the Frontier.” Harper’s, October 1951.
So I have two classes of English 11 this term, and…long story short…my kids are actually a Control group for a study by California State University. CSU developed a curriculum that they would like to impose on high schools throughout the state, but their first step is to conduct a study to determine if they actually get “better results” with their curriculum as opposed to mine. (Not just Mine…the study is being conducted at multiple schools). So all the other English 11 teachers here are teaching CSU’s curriculum, and I am left to do whatever I want.
In the past, English 11 has been taught through the lens of “The American Dream.” What is it, and is it a “real” thing, etc.” I haven’t taught this course in ten years, probably, and I’m still not recovered from my weariness at the theme, and I’m playing around with something different. I’m kind of more interested in the American Character. Who are we, and why? Then read a bunch of documents, and stories, and speeches, and a novel or two, and a play, or two.
So I’ve been thinking about this. And here are some characteristics I think are dominant features of our culture…I’d love everyone on the board to chime in with their thoughts and/or suggestions.
A. Our tendency to violent solutions to problems
1. Mass shootings
2. Incessant wars
B. Constant stream of “enemies” (Commies, Terrorists, Mexicans), and always
living under a threat to security
C. Anti-government i.e. “freedom.”
D. Conspicuous consumption – belief in limitless resources
E. Belief in “hard work + wit = prosperity.”
F. SuperioritySo those are characteristics, imo, of the American personality. I’m happy to entertain other thoughts on this.
I attribute these characteristics to our unique history which I think is this: America was colonized by a lot of people who sought freedom from social and economic restrictions faced in Europe, and elsewhere. European social and economic structures were fairly rigid and static for centuries…until the discovery of vast land that was rich in resources, and basically “up for grabs” to anyone with the balls to head west into the unknown armed only with wits and guns.
I started watching “Godless” this week with my wife (it’s set in Colorado in the 1880s) and I noticed how every time people encounter strangers, they pull out their guns. Now…I don’t think this is just Hollywood. If you were living in the middle of nowhere, basically, and the nearest sheriff was a 15-minute horse ride away, and there are a variety of hostile and/or desperate humans around…I mean, the idea of NOT having multiple guns would be laughable, right?
So the first 300-400 years of our cultural history was dominated by a “kill or be killed” mentality out on the frontier. Webb makes the point – in the article I want – that “frontier” in Europe means the thin international boundary between countries. In America, the Frontier means vast, practically limitless space and resources that have to be mastered by the individual rather than the state. It’s a completely different way of looking at the world. So the history of the Frontier really accounts for A through E above.
Our sense of Superiority, I think, can be traced to the Puritans and their “City on the Hill” concept. Also our puritanical attitudes towards moral issues. The Puritans were the first successful colonists, and they were successful partly because of their strict internal discipline.
So now…here we are with all these Frontier attitudes…but no frontier anymore. All filled up. But we treat our resources as if there is always more just over the horizon, and we are vigilant in our search for enemies.
Anybody got any thoughts on that? Or stories/poems/novels/plays that would help bolster any of these themes?
ZooeyModeratorI doubt that the Rams will keep 12 WRs, or 4 QBs. So I’d look for some cuts to be made there before the season starts.
Just a friendly football tip.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorKate Mitchell, from Facebook
In the El Paso shooting, the gunman drove 9 hours, purposely targeting that border town with an AK-47 in a Walmart hosting whole families on a tax-free, school-shopping weekend. We are being terrorized by our own from within.
But it is Antifa, who has killed exactly zero people ever, whom the GOP want to classify as Terrorists.
ZooeyModeratorThat’s how you make an argument. That was a good read.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorPut them on the defensive for a change.
Yeah.
That seems obvious to me.
So obvious, in fact, that is raises the question, “Why AREN’T Democrats doing that?”
And the only answer that makes any sense, is this…
A goal scored against the GOP is a goal scored against their own benefactors.
That is the only explanation for why the Democrats behave the way they do. They kiss the same ring. Nothing else explains their behavior as well, and no other explanation is as simple.
-
AuthorPosts













