Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorAnd Bloomberg takes votes from Biden so he gets to stay in too. Sanders will do well in Calif-maybe not as high as previously expected. Both Biden and Sanders hope for the magic 15%. One of them won’t get it. Likely Warren. Then we will have a contest for the Democratic voters-progressive or moderate. Both want the same end result but each has a different path.
I think both of their chances (you meant Warren, not Sanders) of hitting 15% in California gratly increased with the dropouts from the race. They only need a few of those votes to put them over 15%.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorActually…this probably hurts Bernie, and the timing is a big part of this.
Tomorrow is Super Tuesday, and California is the biggest haul.
Sanders is way ahead there. Warren is hovering right at about 15% which is the threshold for delegates. She has, so far, underperformed in every single state (i.e. got fewer votes than the polls said she would). Biden is under 15%, but in double digits.
Buttigieg’s support – according to polls – is pretty evenly split between Bernie, Warren, Biden, Klobuchar, and Bloomberg, with Sanders narrowly polling higher than the others.
But Buttigieg’s votes could put Warren and Biden over the 15% threshold that they might otherwise fail to reach. If they fail, Sanders takes the entire 400+ haul of delegates. If they hit it, he ends up with 200-something, and they take a bunch.
I think that’s why Pete quit. He originally packaged himself as a progressive, in favor of universal health care, but got no popular support. He sold out to the billionaires. He has positioned himself as the billionaires’ candidate of the future. He’s their tool, now. And I suspect – after Biden’s showing in SC – they told him it was time to get out of the race. They will see him again down the road, but he had no pathway to the nomination, and it was time to rally behind Biden. And Warren – who also sold out – is going to stay in the entire race even though she can’t even win her home state, just to suck enough delegates away from Sanders to wreck his bid.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorHere is a link to Johns Hopkins tracker map. Madagascar looks safe for now.
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
ZooeyModeratorIt’s been two or three weeks since I’ve seen a poll, but last I knew, Sanders was leading in every Super Tuesday state except Minnesota. South Carolina is like a 0.25 cents an hour pay raise for Biden the day before his landlord tells him his rent is going up $250 a month.
I’m sure the kids will be tough enough to make it to Tuesday.
ZooeyModeratorI agree with all of that.
ZooeyModeratorBut they do sound extreme to Trump supporters. Believe me-I talk to them every day ! It just seems so very simple to me: this is a contest. The idea of a contest is to win. Sanders will not win Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania-game over.
You lost me there. Biden is too extreme for Trump supporters.
ZooeyModeratorI think Sanders is a bigger threat than any of the other candidates to Trump. And I think that is because Sanders competes with Trump in the one category of voters that put Trump over the top, and that is anti-establishment votes. People pissed off with the establishment put Trump in the White House.
Not only do I think the center has shifted, as zn pointed out, I think the division in this country is no longer the same old Left/Right division. I think it is undergoing a kind of Hegelian shift from that to Establishment/Anti-Establishment.
Sanders will bring out different voters than Clinton did, and then ALL of his competitors will. He will bring out more voters. And…he will peel away some of the Anti-Establishment voters who went for Trump the first time, but did so for economic reasons rather than racial reasons. Those people wanted a shake up, Trump promised it to them, and he broke that promise. Sanders appeals to those people. It would only take a few thousand of those to tip the election into Sanders’ hands.
One other thing about Sanders. He isn’t a hypocrite. He has not been duplicitous in his career. All of the other candidates have been, and that is the kind of vulnerability Trump has a nose for, and will exploit endlessly. Trump defines his opponents. Every single one of them. He can’t define Bernie because Bernie is what he is, always has been, and owns it.
ZooeyModeratorPolls show Sanders with the widest margin of polling advantage of all the potential opponents to Trump. But I agree that those polls are not meaningful right now. There are months to go, and…whatever.
I also agree that Sanders is a better debate match up to Trump than any of the other candidates.
That aside…W’s central point is to encourage us to vote blue no matter who because…Trump.
And I will preface what I say by first pointing out that, thanks to the electoral college, it makes no difference whatsoever whom I vote for, or if I vote at all. I am in California, and the corpse of Hubert Humphrey would beat Trump in this state by at least 4 million votes.
I’m not sure where my heart will be on that day, though. It depends in large part on how the nominee gets named.
If it is apparent that the Democrat establishment conspires to prevent Bernie from getting the nomination, that will be the end of it for me. Because if – as polls suggest – Bernie wins the plurality in nearly every state, and the plurality of delegates by a substantial margin – and they deal him out…
I don’t know how I can possibly interpret that other than that the Democrat establishment itself prefers to run the risk of another term of Trump, to running the risk of a Sanders presidency. That conclusion is inescapable because they KNOW what Waterfield knows, that the votes of Sanders supporters are very much in doubt. That will be undeniable proof that they would rather lose to Trump, but retain control of the party (and, btw, wrap their arms around the coffers of money that will pour into the party in opposition to Trump) then to risk Sanders winning, and his likely reconfiguration of the party away from corporate fealty. The Democrats will have told all of us to go to hell. In my view, they will have spit in the face of W’s sentiment: “The stakes are really high here. For some of us older voters its no longer about us-its about our children and their children.”
February 28, 2020 at 3:12 pm in reply to: DNC Superdelegate for Brokered Decision Is GOP Donor & Health Care Lobbyist #111706
ZooeyModeratorI wonder if Owen will try his best to represent the will of the people.
ZooeyModerator
February 27, 2020 at 8:59 pm in reply to: just some “no thread for em” various political tweets … 2/25 thru ? #111685
ZooeyModerator
Which is funny because just yesterday, my right wing brother was claiming that the Chinese government clamped down on information in the early going with the virus, and that was proof that government-run healthcare is a disaster.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
February 27, 2020 at 11:35 am in reply to: Robert B. Reich: Sanders might be the safest choice #111674
ZooeyModeratorI am waiting for the articles that say, “Hey, it will be fine. Don’t worry. Sanders won’t get this crap passed, anyway.”
That’s when it’s safe to stop chewing the bedsheet.
February 25, 2020 at 9:53 pm in reply to: Washington Post: Sanders a risk… the media hates Bernie thread #111645
ZooeyModeratorWell I deleted my earlier one. If someone doubles a posting I already made & the simplest solution is to delete mine, that’s what I do. Why? Obviously because I am just BREATHTAKINGLY and AMAZINGLY selfless and egoless about things like that.

Okay, but you’re soft on crime.
I would have executed wv in Central Park. That’s what they did in France in 1940.
February 25, 2020 at 8:58 pm in reply to: Washington Post: Sanders a risk… the media hates Bernie thread #111640
ZooeyModeratorSo the media-bias against bernie has made it to late-night comedy. Better late, than never
That’s a popular clip. It’s the same one I deleted above because zn beat us to it. It’s up there ^^^^^^^
February 25, 2020 at 3:28 pm in reply to: Washington Post: Sanders a risk… the media hates Bernie thread #111627
ZooeyModeratorAre you still thinking of immigrating, Zooey?
Yeah. I don’t remember what all I said, but basically I can’t afford to stay in California anyway on my pension, so as long as I’m moving, I may as well go somewhere I find more interesting. At least until I feel the call to return home. But, yes, that’s the plan. I think I want to spend at least a couple of years in Mallorca, Malta, Portugal, Italy…somewhere like that. Then…we’ll see. I liked SE Asia a lot. Lots of variables, though.
February 25, 2020 at 2:38 pm in reply to: Washington Post: Sanders a risk… the media hates Bernie thread #111625
ZooeyModeratorOops. I posted a video zn already posted.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by
Zooey.
February 25, 2020 at 1:20 pm in reply to: Washington Post: Sanders a risk… the media hates Bernie thread #111619
ZooeyModeratorThey went too far. They know that now.
I don’t think they know that at all. I think the DNC is THAT out of touch.
You got everyone nodding their heads in unison over the Hillary claim that Sanders’ “Bernie Bros” are actually a thing, and that they are the reason she lost.
And you’ve got James Fucking Carville melting down and calling Sanders a Commie, FFS, and complaining that the media has failed to “educate” young people who are deluded by Sanders.
I think the DNC firmly BELIEVES the shit they sow, and they think their way is Practical, Sensible, Objectively Good for the Country, and so on. After all, poor people go to Starbucks (in their imagination), so it’s really not that bad out there.
February 24, 2020 at 8:14 pm in reply to: Washington Post: Sanders a risk… the media hates Bernie thread #111603
ZooeyModeratorSanders hasn’t done anything…
except change the entire political conversation in this country, dragging the Overton Window farther to the Left than it has been in 50 years.
February 24, 2020 at 2:41 pm in reply to: Washington Post: Sanders a risk… the media hates Bernie thread #111595
ZooeyModeratorTo add to that.
The young’uns were told they had to go to college, so they did. What they got was a monthly payment the size of a housing payment, but with no housing.
They were promised good-paying jobs. They got minimum wage jobs and internships, so they’re living in mom’s basement.
We stuck them with crappy medical insurance that they have to pay for in order to subsidize other people because statistically, they don’t use it much.
We told them to be scared of Muslims, but they don’t see any scary Muslims. And they don’t care about gays, and they don’t remember a time when there was no black president. Meanwhile…you all forgot to scare them about socialism because you thought you won that battle forever. So they aren’t scared of it. You made them scared of shit that doesn’t exist.
Sorry, Boomers. That’s the generation you raised, and the demographics are bringing them and multicultural urban areas into dominance. That’s happening, and Stephen Miller can’t stop it.
Meanwhile the world is on fire, and we aren’t doing anything about it. So they see that, too.
Welcome Bernie Sanders.
February 24, 2020 at 2:17 pm in reply to: Washington Post: Sanders a risk… the media hates Bernie thread #111593
ZooeyModeratorThat Krystal Ball vid is worth watching. At least the last three mins or so.
What I wonder is, what will the Dem-MSM actually DO, if Bernie gets the Nomination?
Will they torpedo him? Because, think about it — if you are corporate-centrist, whats the best-case-scenario? If Bernie loses to Trump, the Dems will NEVER put up another progressive. At least they wont for the next 20 years.
What we’ll get is ‘fake progressives’ like Warren and Buddachex.So a lot is riding on Bernie. The whole American progressive movement.
He’s gotta win.
w
vBut…the old guard is over 65, and dying off year-by-year. The young’uns perceive the status quo as an existential threat. Not just a difference in opinions about policies, or philosophy of government. They don’t want to live in a Mad Max movie that starts with a completely trashed environment. The gig is up for corporate polluters. It is. It’s over. So we can either do this peacefully, or those Millennials that everyone thinks are so happy to hang out in Mom’s basement are going to emerge with some baseball bats. I am seeing a most stronger commitment now than I did in 2016. It ain’t a scientific sample. But it’s what I see. It’s a matter of time.
ZooeyModeratorPramila goes yard.
Though I wish somebody would point out that the public option means that the private insurance industries will lower their rates and improve their coverage short term while they finance politicians to gut financing for the Public Option and wear it down to the point that Americans come to believe – permanently – that the government is no good at running health insurance. I mean…that is Plan B for them if they can’t stop M4A in its tracks. Removing private insurance gets rid of that pressure, and becomes much harder for industry sympathizers to erode M4A.
February 24, 2020 at 1:59 pm in reply to: some say american democratic socialism is the real center #111591
ZooeyModeratorOops. Maybe this doesn’t belong in this thread. I was thinking of the last point made in the article, though, about how his policies are basically centrist and not radical.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts









