Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 21,961 through 21,990 (of 48,526 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    When a group of schoolboys were marooned on an island in 1965, it turned out very differently from William Golding’s bestseller, writes Rutger Bregman

    Rutger Bregman

    from the wiki

    In January 2019, Bregman took part in a panel debate at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he criticised the event for its focus on philanthropy rather than tax avoidance and the need for fair taxation. His intervention was widely reported and followed on social media.

    According to a February 20, 2019 Guardian article, during a February 2019 interview in Amsterdam Fox News anchor and journalist, Tucker Carlson after Davos, Bregman told Carlson that the United States “could easily crack down on tax paradises” if they wanted to and that Fox News would not cover stories about tax evasion by the wealthy. He said that Carlson himself, had been taking “dirty money” for years from the CATO Institute where he was senior fellow and which is “funded by Koch billionaires”—-Charles Koch and David Koch. He said that Carlson and other Fox News anchors are “millionaires paid by billionaires”—-referring to the Murdochs and, in Carlson’s case, the Koch brothers. Bregman told Carlson that “what the Murdochs want you to do [on Fox News] is scapegoat immigrants instead of talking about tax avoidance”. Carlson was angered by Bregman’s comments. Bregman posted a video of his unaired interview with Carlson on NowThis News on YouTube on February 20, 2019. By July the video had received 2,349,846 views.

    in reply to: OL talk, 2020 #114778
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Random thoughts. (Or, Ram-dom thoughts.)

    I count Brewer as possible top depth. He has an interesting resume. He seems to be a OG/ROT type.

    I think Edwards and Evans are starters, the only question is whether Evans is at ROT or LOG. If Hav can’t come back, then he’s at ROT and the question just becomes who plays LOG, with Corbett probably in the lead.

    If Hav can play then the OL is probably AW Evans Blythe Edwards Hav, and probably with Allen Corbett & NB (and as I said maybe Brewer too) as locks for depth.

    This year the active game day roster is 47, which could mean keeping more linemen than usual. Actually it can be 48 if the rest of the game-day roster includes at least eight offensive linemen. That means, really, they get 3 active sideline lineman in addition to the starting 5 plus an extra player at a different position.

    One other thing–they not only only drafted one lineman, they brought in only 1 UDFA lineman, which is unusual for them. Usually it’s more.

    So it’s 15 OL coming to camp. That includes Anchrum & Coleman Shelton.

    The 15 OL also includes a 2019 practice squader who flew under the radar last year–OC Nate Trewyn (6’4″, 313; Associated Press first-team Division III All American from University of Wisconsin-Whitewater; winner of the 2018 Remington Award as top center in Division III; UDFA with Tampa in 2019—Rams snatched him in November when Tampa promoted him to the active roster then waived him to put him back on the practice squad).

    ==

    More on Trewyn

    ==

    den-the-coach

    Trewyn showed off his diverse skill-set throughout the workout in front of all 32 NFL teams, putting up 26 reps in the bench press, running 5.38 seconds in the 40-yard dash and 7.39 in the three-cone drill, jumping 28.5” in the vertical, 101” in the broad, and running the short shuttle in 6.69 seconds.

    ==

    from https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2019/04/16/packers-interested-in-wisconsin-whitewater-c-nate-trewyn/

    Tony Pauline of Draft Analyst

    “He’s a tough, wide-bodied blocker at the pivot who plays with terrific fundamentals,” Pauline wrote.

    Trewyn earlier took part in the NFLPA Collegiate Bowl, where he turned in what Pauline refers to as an “impressive” practice week performance.

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114774
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114766
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114763
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #114761
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: schedule #114760
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114758
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: OL talk, 2020 #114757
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams draft signals confidence in O-Line

    J.B. Long

    https://www.therams.com/news/draft-signals-confidence-in-offensive-line

    Survey a group of Rams fans about which position group was most culpable for the 2019 team missing the postseason and the results would be nearly unanimous.

    Offensive line.

    After enjoying an improbable run of health and continuity in recent seasons, last year saw a regression to the mean, and with it, some mean regression.

    As documented in a previous discussion, nine Rams started along the offensive front in the first 11 weeks, including six who were making their first or second NFL start.

    Joe Noteboom and Brian Allen struggled to replace Rodger Saffold and John Sullivan before suffering season-ending injuries.

    Right tackle Rob Havenstein was earning a career-low Pro Football Focus grade before a Week 10 injury in Pittsburgh also ended his campaign.

    So understandably, even with total personnel retention, the line was considered an area of need going into the NFL Draft.

    Instead, the Rams doubled-down on a group that stabilized in December, but in aggregate rated among the NFL’s worst in 2019.

    They didn’t choose an offensive lineman until their final pick (guard Tremayne Anchrum at 250 overall) or acquire help through trade or free agency, signaling a readiness to run it back with their existing talent, banking on internal development.

    “Last year was beneficial for us, in spite of having some of the injuries and shuffling things around,” Sean McVay said. “You got a chance to really evaluate a lot of guys playing in real games that count and you can see that there’s a lot of upside.”

    It will be at least a year – likely two or three – before we can truly evaluate the merits of this approach, and the results will depend on a number of factors. Most notably, can this group of Rams realize that upside McVay referenced, both individually and collectively?

    But also, do players like Ezra Cleveland (58th pick, Minnesota) or Josh Jones (72nd pick, Arizona) turn into All-Pro tackles? Or similarly, do several of the interior linemen selected in a Day Two stretch where the Rams had four selections outperform L.A.’s existing options?

    In the present, you can understand how general manager Les Snead, offensive line coach Aaron Kromer, and McVay might prefer what they have in house. And it’s not as if they haven’t spent comparable draft capital in recent years on this position group.

    2018: Joe Noteboom (3rd round), Brian Allen (4th), Jamil Demby (6th)

    2019: Bobby Evans (3rd), David Edwards (5th)

    They also traded in a 2021 fifth-round pick to acquire Austin Corbett from the Browns last season.

    “You look at Austin,” McVay says of the 33rd overall selection from two years ago. “You say, alright, what does it look like if you give him an opportunity to have a training camp and some guidance under Coach Kromer’s tutelage.”

    After solidifying the group late last season by sliding from right guard to center, Austin Blythe agreed to a one-year offer and McVay expects him to maintain control of that position going into 2020.

    “I think he did a really nice job stepping in (at center),” the head coach said on the Rams Revealed podcast. “His ability to confidently get out the calls, there was a very similar feel to things that you loved so much about John Sullivan.”

    David Edwards bounced from left guard to right, where he’s now the incumbent in 2020 after breaking in with 10 starts to finish his rookie season.

    In all likelihood, that leaves Noteboom and Corbett to battle for left guard and Evans and Havenstein to settle the starting right tackle job.

    Whoever comes up empty in those battles will join Allen in providing valuable depth, which is all the more meaningful under the new CBA rules allowing for 55-man rosters and 48 dressed on game day, with a requirement for one additional active offensive lineman compared to prior years.

    Rounding out the projected starters, at left tackle, 38-year old Andrew Whitworth postponed retirement with a new three-year contract. He, too, saw the Friday night selections at running back, receiver, edge rusher, and safety as affirmation that the Rams already have the right offensive linemen in the facility.

    “I really think it is a vote of confidence in that we see there’s a bunch of guys in our room that have an opportunity to help us,” Whitworth said during the Draft. “It’s going to be really the best scenario you can possibly have in this business is you have a whole bunch of guys for very few positions. And hopefully these guys will fight and compete, and we’ll get the best five on the field.”

    There’s one more nuance specific to our current global predicament that I think is relevant to the choice the Rams made: Is this the time to be teaching a rookie lineman McVay’s playbook, via Zoom and tablets? With a compromised off-season program (and potentially training camp), how legitimate were the hopes of landing a plug-and-play starter?

    Drafting from outside the Top 50, that would have been a risky proposition with limited potential to find an upgrade over the options previously discussed, at least in the near-term.

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114756
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: signs, comics, memes, & other visual aids #114752
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: when can the NFL start again #114747
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114745
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: schedule #114738
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Field Yates@FieldYates
    The Seahawks are scheduled to travel the most miles in the NFL this season at 29,203, followed by the Rams (26,104) and 49ers (25,507).

    The Ravens will travel just 6,310 miles in 2020, the fewest by any NFL team in the past four seasons.

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #114734
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114733
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Stu Jackson@StuJRams
    Sean McVay talks Rams 2020 schedule:

    “The first thing that stands out is just the opportunity to open up on primetime in front of the world in the new stadium.”

    ==

    NFL Research@NFLResearch
    Tom Brady and Philip Rivers are expected to be the 5th and 6th QBs to start for new teams after having previously won 100+ starts for a different franchise.

    They will join Peyton Manning and Hall of Famers Brett Favre, Joe Montana and Johnny Unitas.

    ==

    JJ Cooper@jjcoop36
    In talking to scouts in preparation for a five round draft I heard some concerns. Notably unless they come from money a player signing for $20K or less will likely need to work full-time in offseason. Won’t be able to train in offseason same as a player receiving even $100k.

    in reply to: schedule #114732
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    McKay Coppins@mckaycoppins
    One of the weirdest features of our discourse is how people who fire off ranty, unhinged takes on Twitter then demand careful, nuanced responses from people who disagree and act like martyrs when it doesn’t happen.

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #114730
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: when can the NFL start again #114729
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114724
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #114723
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Basil #114718
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: economics & the virus #114716
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    An Epidemic of Hardship and Hunger
    Why won’t Republicans help Americans losing their jobs?

    Paul Krugman

    link https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/07/opinion/coronavirus-republicans-jobs.html

    Covid-19 has had a devastating effect on workers. The economy has plunged so quickly that official statistics can’t keep up, but the available data suggest that tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs through no fault of their own, with more job losses to come and full recovery probably years away.

    But Republicans adamantly oppose extending enhanced unemployment benefits — such an extension, says Senator Lindsey Graham, will take place “over our dead bodies.” (Actually, over other people’s dead bodies.)

    They apparently want to return to a situation in which most unemployed workers get no benefits at all, and even those collecting unemployment insurance get only a small fraction of their previous income.

    Because most working-age Americans receive health insurance through their employers, job losses will cause a huge rise in the number of uninsured. The only mitigating factor is the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, which will allow many though by no means all of the newly uninsured to find alternative coverage.

    But the Trump administration is still trying to have the Affordable Care Act ruled unconstitutional; “We want to terminate health care under Obamacare,” declared Donald Trump, even though the administration has never offered a serious alternative.

    Bear in mind that ending Obamacare would end protection for Americans with pre-existing conditions — and that insurers would probably refuse to cover anyone who had Covid-19.

    Finally, the devastation caused by the coronavirus has left many in the world’s wealthiest major nation unable to put sufficient food on the table. Families with children under 12 are especially hard hit: According to one recent survey, 41 percent of these families are already unable to afford enough to eat. Food banks are overwhelmed, with lines sometimes a mile long.

    But Republicans are still trying to make food stamps harder to get, and fiercely oppose proposals to temporarily make food aid more generous.

    By now everyone who follows the news has a sense of how badly the Trump administration and its allies botched and continue to botch the medical side of the Covid-19 pandemic. Weeks of denial and the failure to implement remotely adequate testing allowed the virus to spread almost unchecked.

    Attempts to restart the economy even though the pandemic is far from controlled will lead to many more deaths, and will probably backfire even in purely economic terms as states are forced to lock down again.

    But we’re only now starting to get a sense of the Republican Party’s cruelty toward the economic victims of the coronavirus. In the face of what amounts to a vast natural disaster, you might have expected conservatives to break, at least temporarily, with their traditional opposition to helping fellow citizens in need. But no; they’re as determined as ever to punish the poor and unlucky.

    What’s remarkable about this determination is that the usual arguments against helping the needy, which were weak even in normal times, have become completely unsustainable in the face of the pandemic. Yet those arguments, zombielike, just keep shambling on.

    For example, you still hear complaints that spending on food stamps and unemployment benefits increases the deficit. Now, Republicans never really cared about budget deficits; they demonstrated their hypocrisy by cheerfully passing a huge tax cut in 2017, and saying nothing as deficits surged. But it’s just absurd to complain about the cost of food stamps even as we offer corporations hundreds of billions in loans and loan guarantees.

    But what’s even worse, if you ask me, is hearing Republicans complain that food stamps and unemployment benefits reduce the incentive to seek work. There was never serious evidence for this claim, but right now — at a time when workers can’t work, because doing their normal jobs would kill lots of people — I find it hard to understand how anyone can make this argument without gagging.

    So what explains the G.O.P.’s extraordinary indifference to the plight of Americans impoverished by this national disaster?

    One answer may be that much of America’s right has effectively decided that we should simply go back to business as usual and accept the resulting death toll. Those who want to take that route may view anything that reduces hardship, and therefore makes social distancing more tolerable, as an obstacle to their plans.

    Also, conservatives may worry that if we help those in distress, even temporarily, many Americans might decide that a stronger social safety net is a good thing in general. If your political strategy depends on convincing people that government is always the problem, never the solution, you don’t want voters to see the government actually doing good, even in times of dire need.

    Whatever the reasons, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Americans suffering from the economic consequences of Covid-19 will get far less help than they should. Having already condemned tens of thousands to unnecessary death, Trump and his allies are in the process of condemning tens of millions to unnecessary hardship.

    in reply to: schedule #114715
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: schedule #114713
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Links to some articles.

    …

    Instant reaction to Rams 2020 schedule
    J.B. Long
    https://www.therams.com/news/instant-reaction-to-2020-schedule

    Los Angeles Rams’ schedule 2020: Opening stretch looks extremely daunting
    Lindsey Thiry
    https://www.espn.com/blog/los-angeles-rams/post/_/id/41663/los-angeles-rams-schedule-2020-opening-stretch-looks-extremely-daunting

    6 takeaways from the Rams’ 2020 schedule
    Cameron DaSilva
    6 takeaways from the Rams' 2020 schedule

    7 toughest games on the Rams’ 2020 schedule
    Cameron DaSilva
    7 toughest games on the Rams' 2020 schedule

    in reply to: OL talk, 2020 #114711
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PARAM

    I saw no reason why they should have spent high draft capital on offensive lineman in the 2020 draft.

    And no one is saying “because the Rams barely missed the playoffs” they had good O line play. The point is, they weren’t nearly as bad as the overplayed doom and gloom reviewers suggest.

    On the other hand, some people have said, it was an immediate improvement when Noteboom went down. I think that improvement was already happening despite the 3 game losing streak. The O line had a lot of issues and IMHO, those issues were the result of injuries, replacements and a lack of continuity. But the offense averaged something like 27 PPG in the first 5 games. If the defense showed up against Tampa and Zeurlein makes a kick against Seattle, we’re 11-5.

    Did they play better? Sure. Not against a good D like the Steelers though. Of course two guys go down in that game so before they get to the Chicago game, they’re down two more lineman. Whitworth and Blythe were the only two who started the season and Blythe missed a game early on, a win. So the process started all over again.

    Not against stellar competition again but Edwards, Corbett and Evans got better the more they played. We got another reprieve and took advantage of it, going 3-1. But those first two games the OL didn’t look distinctly improved. Chicago where we scored 17 points, then Baltimore where we looked like a bad O line. But facing a quick 28-0 deficit can aid in that. Against Arizona and Seattle they looked better. I thought Evans played better, faster than the other two. And they got better as a unit, playing in 7 straight.

    So there was improvement the longer the subs played together and that was over 7 games with a surrounding cast who were playing their 10th to 16th game. Hell, Edwards had 10 games to improve. The opening OL played 5 games and 1 series together with a surrounding cast playing the same.

    In 6 of our 7 losses the defense allowed 35.7 PPG. In 3 of our 7 losses the offense scored 31.3 (34, 29 and 31). You can not lose 3 games when your offense is at 30 points. It’s totally unacceptable. So we can point to the O line and they had troubles….injuries, warts, what-have-you. But I can’t in good conscience say “our biggest issue in 2019 was our O line”.

    Key point: they improved on the tail end of the season the longer the replacements played together. There is also the opponent factor. In the end, 3 different OL injuries, adjustments by the coaching staff, improvement by the replacements and we finish 9-7. It seems like it could have been much, much worse. Bottom line is this. That line, with 9 different starters played well enough to win 9 games. The line that starts this year hopefully finishes it but if there are problems I don’t think we’ll be in trouble nearly as much as last year. No greenhorns even at the backup positions. We have enough talent to win. Hell we won 9 games with that line discombobulated for at least 6 games. Hopeful? A little. Unreasonable? Absolutely not.

    Some cast doubt on Kromer. Yes it would seem everywhere Kromer goes, they do have some excellent lineman already there, but they also immediately acquire good free agent lineman and they draft lineman who are successful under his tutelage. When he got to Chicago, they acquired Bushrod (from New Orleans, Kromer’s former stop) and drafted Long and Mills. In Buffalo they acquired Incognito, who despite being a good lineman, hadn’t played in 2014 after being suspended for the half the season in 2013. I don’t remember how many teams were lined up to sign him but Buffalo ended up with him. They also drafted Miller and acquired Jordan Mills from Chicago (Kromer’s former stop). That was a good OL. Led the league in rushing yards and ypc both years. Had a rookie and a 2nd year guy on those lines. In Los Angeles, they acquired Whitworth and Sullivan. It appears more than fortuitous that Kromer are the teams that make these important OL acquisitions soon after hiring him.

    in reply to: schedule #114707
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    alyoshamucci

    Couple hard turnaround weeks and lots of time on the east coast … but the wins and losses look favorable.

    NorCalRamFan
    3 of first five games on east coast
    Four of the last six are at home
    And five of the last eight
    Rams are 2.5 points underdog against the cowboys for our home opener

    Ramsman34
    5 of 6 divisional games are after the Bye. we should be a well oiled machine by then. and, the first divisional game is week 6 against the whiners.

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    I could see anything from 7-9 to 11-5

    LindseyThiry@LindseyThiry
    Right now, mostly based on departures and unproven replacements, I have them at 8-8. It’s a brutal division, and a pretty tough schedule.

    Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
    There are collapsible elements to the schedule (all teams share a bye with their Week 2 opponents).

    All shows this a preference: moving back things over shortening

    Another thing that I didn’t know beforehand: As part of the bid process, cities contending to host Super Bowls must have contingency dates cleared in case the NFL has to delay the game.

    So Tampa has those for Super Bowl LV.

    Darren Rovell@darrenrovell
    Spoke to some big brokers tonight.

    Secondary sales of NFL tickets are roughly 15 percent of what they normally are when the schedule is released.

    ==

Viewing 30 posts - 21,961 through 21,990 (of 48,526 total)