Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
znModeratorWe've been awarded three comp picks in the 2021 NFL Draft.
— Los Angeles Rams (@RamsNFL) March 10, 2021
znModeratorTom Pelissero@TomPelissero
Here’s the
2021 compensatory draft picks that just went to clubs.
March 10, 2021 at 5:09 pm in reply to: Les Snead Press Conference Ahead of Free Agency (w/ transcript) #128292
znModeratorJourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
Written a lot about this but for team-building enthusiasts, Rams GM Les Snead broke down the Rams’ entire roster-building/cap strategy over the course of eight-minute response, ending w/ definitive “yes” re. whether Rams are comfortable being in cap situation y/y. Worth a watch.Hinges, of course, on betting they’ll win consistently.
– Rams believe they can bc of coach, and guys like AD, Ramsey, etc.
– Because they believe they get more value from proven players than what they feel will consistently be late-round picks, no issues trading them.– In complement, they rely on comp picks, personnel and data people who can correctly project long-term potential of mid-round picks, coaches to help develop, and players themselves to stay on development course to start around core contracts.
How long can such an ecosystemkeep its balance in that way? As long as they keep winning 9-plus per/playoffs? Do other variables disrupt that balance? That’s the story of the next few years for the Rams, in my mind.
March 10, 2021 at 12:47 pm in reply to: Les Snead Press Conference Ahead of Free Agency (w/ transcript) #128289
znModeratorNote: these tweets overlap a bit but they also each have a detail or 2 the others don’t.
…
Jourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
Snead says the Rams are in the process of restructuring multiple contracts and have been in that process for a couple weeks. He adds their preference is to do that fully to get under the cap without cuts or trades. Several top contracts can be maneuvered.“Difficult decisions” ahead, says Snead, as the Rams move to get under the cap. Adds it means that some guys who otherwise may have stayed may have to move on.
Stu Jackson@StuJRams
Rams GM Les Snead on restructuring deals to navigate their current salary cap situation: “That would be priority number one.” Says team is working on that right now, and preference is to get under the cap without making cuts or trades.Lindsey Thiry@LindseyThiry
Rams GM Les Snead says there have been conversations with players/agents about restructuring contracts and that the “Vision is to get to the finish line without releasing players.”Stu Jackson@StuJRams
Rams GM Les Snead on NFL teams being limited to 3 representatives at pro days this year: Nothing different than previous years, because the team hasn’t usually sent that many reps to a pro day in the past.March 10, 2021 at 12:43 pm in reply to: Les Snead Press Conference Ahead of Free Agency (w/ transcript) #128288
znModerator.@JourdanRodrigue is insanely good at her job. Asked every single question on topics we wanted more information on.
Here’s Snead discussing the restructuring process, and how it holds priority over some other immediate obligations: pic.twitter.com/3HsafWAwY9
— Rams Brothers (@RamsBrothers) March 10, 2021
March 10, 2021 at 12:41 pm in reply to: Les Snead Press Conference Ahead of Free Agency (w/ transcript) #128287
znModeratorLes Snead on the new guy we can’t technically talk about yet. pic.twitter.com/D0HDLfb4I0
— Rams Brothers (@RamsBrothers) March 10, 2021
znModeratorLindsey Thiry@LindseyThiry
With the 2021 salary cap set at $182.5 million, the Rams’ adjusted salary cap will be $187,099,141, according to Roster Management System used by ESPN. With a week until free agency begins, the Rams are over the cap by $31.3 million, per RMS, and that accounts for the pending trade that send Jared Goff to the Lions in exchange for Matthew Stafford. The Rams also have $34 million in dead money, per RMS.
znModeratorOnly one NFL team has less cap space than the Rams right now https://t.co/3abuBkYNRP
— Rams Wire (@TheRamsWire) March 7, 2021
znModeratorMoving things from another thread to here.
==
In advance of the new NFL League Year, decided to do what so many have asked for: Salary Cap 101. A primer on the Cap, busting myths about it along the way. Settle in:https://t.co/kLHLxIYjC9
— Andrew Brandt (@AndrewBrandt) March 2, 2021
==
here is the article: good read:
URL = https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/03/02/business-of-football-understanding-the-salary-cap-dead-money
Business of Football: Understanding the Salary Cap, Dead Money and Impact of 2021 Decrease
With NFL teams about to open their wallets, here’s a refresher course on the salary cap and an explanation of why we’ve seen bigger dead-money cap hits lately.ANDREW BRANDT MAR 2, 2021
Of all the areas of coverage around the NFL, there is not one more frequently misinformed, misunderstood and misrepresented than that of the salary cap. It is one of these subjects that qualify for the adage: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Yes, I realize most fans and media know all they want to know about the cap, which for many fans, is simply how far their team is under it. That, however, is a momentary snapshot into a complicated and ever-changing figure. Managing the NFL salary cap, as I did for 10 years with the Packers, is like stuffing an octopus in a box; there is always something trying to hang out. Every action has a reaction; every move with one player is watched by every other player (and agent); precedent is paramount.
Cap management is one of the three parts of an NFL team’s football operation, along with coaching and player evaluation. The better-managed teams have all three areas working in concert, communicating and buying into one another’s plan. And this year, more than any other year in memory, cap management may be the most important of the triad of football operations.
With that in mind, and with my background, I thought I would answer some common cap questions, debunk some cap myths and try to give you a better understanding of that amorphous thing we call the NFL salary cap. With the NFL offseason upon us, settle in for this master class.
What is the salary cap and how is it calculated?
The cap is an artificial limit on collective player spending set by the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the governing document between the NFL and the NFL Players Association. Everything about the NFL is rooted in competitive balance. The cap, in theory at least, levels the playing field on the financial side.
The CBA sets the percentages for sharing of NFL revenue, dividing it between the owners and the players according to what has been negotiated. Prior to the two most recent CBAs, the players’ share was roughly 50% of NFL revenues. Recently the pendulum has swung toward ownership, with owners getting 53% and the players receiving 47%, rising by a point to 48% once the NFL starts playing 17 games per regular season but getting no higher for the players over the next decade.
Thus, to calculate the cap in simplest terms: 47% of NFL revenues is divided by 32—the number of NFL teams—to set the team cap number for the year. For 2020 that number was $198 million. For 2021 due to economic losses suffered from a year of playing largely without fans—that number will go down considerably. As that number has not been set yet, for our purposes we will estimate the 2021 cap to be $185 million.
Myth: The reduced cap for 2021 has NFL teams scrambling
No. NFL teams are not waking up in March of 2021 and saying, “Oh my God, what are we going to do with a dramatically reduced cap?” This diminution of the 2021 cap was known by every team—as well as every player, fan and media member since July, when the NFL and NFLPA negotiated that it would be no lower than $175 million. This idea out there that teams are now scrambling is laughable; they have known about this for nine months. Teams spend eight months preparing for the draft; the good ones have been preparing eight months for the reduced cap.
Myth: The $185 million number is the cap minimum number for 2021
No. The $185 million is not the minimum, or floor; it is the maximum, or ceiling, for the 2021 team cap. A salary cap has a minimum as well as a maximum; many do not know that, as NFL teams have—and should have—a minimum that they have to spend on players.
I have been critical of the CBA minimum team spending requirements, as there is neither annual accounting nor biannual accounting, but rather it is only viewed over three- or four-year tranches. As an example, the Steelers spent $138 million in 2020, a stunning $60 million below the cap. No matter how much they spend in the year before or after, that should not happen, but that is for another discussion. Suffice it to say the minimum spending for 2021 could be well below $185 million, especially with such a long inspection period.
Myth: Every NFL team’s cap number is going to be $185 million
No. Actually, no team’s cap number is going to be $185 million (or whatever the final cap number is).
The 2011 CBA, for the first time, allowed teams to carry over unused cap room from one year to the next. In managing the cap for the Packers, we did not have that option; it was use it or lose it. I had to negotiate dummy incentives—such as a clause giving our third-string quarterback $20 million if he threw seven touchdowns in our last game—to carry over cap room. (When he didn’t earn the incentive, we would get it as a credit toward the next year.) Now teams don’t have to play those games.
As per NFLPA numbers, every team in the league has carried over 2020 cap room, from a low of roughly $500,000 for the Ravens to a high of more than $30 million for the Colts. Teams carrying over $20-plus million of cap include the Jets, Browns, Eagles, Cowboys and Jaguars. Thus, although the team cap is $185 million, the Colts’ adjusted cap will be around $215 million, and so on.
And again, these teams have been preparing, or should have been preparing, for this reduced cap for months.
Myth: Unlike the NBA, the NFL has a “hard cap”
No. The NFL does not have a hard cap; it has a soft cap (a yarmulke, if you will). To clarify, no team can go “over the cap” in terms of cap accounting. However, teams can and do go over the cap in terms of cash spending due to the feature of the NFL cap that differentiates it from all other sports leagues: proration.
Here is an example: Let’s say a player signs a four-year contract with a $20 million signing bonus. Signing bonuses, for cap purposes, are prorated. Thus, that player’s bonus is treated as $5 million in cap each year. The “cash over cap” for that one player, on one bonus of one contract, is $15 million: He received $20 million cash with only $5 million against the cap. This illustrates how teams are able to spend over the cap in terms of cash spending without being over the cap in terms of cap accounting.
But alas, the future cap charges do not go away. The problem with proration is when things go south with the player, leading to the scourge of the cap: dead money.
Dead money is cap accounting for players no longer on a team’s roster, “dead weight” that hamstrings teams from signing “live” players. We have now seen—within the last month—the two largest dead-money charges in NFL history in Jared Goff and Carson Wentz. These contracts were structured as if there was no way on God’s green earth the teams would exit them early—with tens of millions of future proratable monies (large signing bonuses, guaranteed option and roster bonuses, etc.) pushed out into future years as unamortized proration. Therein lies the rub. When a player separates—through release or trade—all unamortized proration accelerates on the team’s cap.
Goff will count $22 million on the 2021 Rams’ cap while playing for the Lions. Wentz will count $34 million on the Eagles’ cap, the fourth-highest cap charge in the NFL this year, while playing for the Colts. That is why I said for months that he would not be traded, and why I truly underestimated the breach of trust between Wentz and the Eagles.
For you fantasy football players playing in cap leagues, imagine that while the other players have $185 to play with, you start the draft with $151. You are the Eagles.
Myth: NFL teams don’t care as much as they used to about dead money
No. Believe me, they care: I have talked to members of several, including the Eagles, who desperately wanted to avoid this scenario.
Beyond Goff and Wentz, the only other two dead-money charges in history over $20 million are for receivers, Antonio Brown and Brandin Cooks. As to this being the evidence of teams’ willingness to incur dead-money charges? Please.
Brown would have been kept on the Steelers for many more years if he hadn’t forced his way out of town. As for Cooks, well, when it comes to dead money (and first-round draft picks), they do not care. They are true outliers.
Myth: Cap gurus magically create cap room by moving it into future years
No. You could do that and, sorry, no, you wouldn’t be a cap guru. You could take a big salary or a big bonus (not currently prorated), turn it into signing bonus (prorated) and, in the stroke of the player’s pen, cap room would magically appear and the problem would be deferred, although not solved.
The Rams did this with Goff. The Eagles did this with Wentz. The Saints have done this repeatedly with Drew Brees. The Steelers have done this repeatedly with Ben Roethlisberger. Pain is now being felt by the first two teams and will soon be felt by the latter two. Some NFL teams are doing this now to alleviate some existing cap problems, continuing the vicious cycle of stacking additional proration upon already existing proration and creating more problems down the road.
No one doing this is a cap guru. A true cap guru sets a team up so it never needs to do much of this, if any at all.
So Andrew, what is the best way to manage an NFL cap?
It is simple: Pay as you go. The goal for every team’s cap management, in my opinion, is to match, as much as possible, cash spending and cap accounting. It is to resist the temptation for short-term gain—which always leads to long-term pain—and pay as you go.
One of the things I am most proud of from my time in Green Bay is resisting temptation to play the “prorate/push out” cap game with Brett Favre. I learned from what I had seen at that time around the league, noting huge dead-money charges when franchise quarterbacks separated, including John Elway, Troy Aikman, Steve Young, Dan Marino, Steve McNair and more. I knew at some point we would not have Brett; I did not want to burden the future front office and the future quarterback (who turned out to be Aaron Rodgers) with a $20-plus million cap charge for someone not there. Brett was ultimately traded with a final dead-money charge to the team of $600,000. Sorry for the not-at-all-humble brag, but you get my point.
For a current example, the 49ers, in negotiating the Jimmy Garoppolo contract, took on a first-year cap number of $37 million, very close to the first-year cash number of $40 million. Now, if the 49ers decide to move on from Garoppolo, it will cost them less than $3 million in dead money, a drop in the bucket compared to the $34 million for Wentz and $22 million for Goff. How a team proves itself as cap-savvy is by putting itself in a position to have ultimate flexibility on its roster, never to have to prorate, to put the team in position for sustained success.
Many teams do this well besides the 49ers, including the Buccaneers, Jaguars, Colts, Patriots and Browns, among others. They are ahead of the curve with the competitive advantage of being able to front-load, not back-load, cap. Thus, if things go south with a player, they can move on without the albatross of dead cap.
The reduced 2021 cap represents a huge opportunity for well-managed cap teams to, as the cool kids say, flex. More than any year before, prudent and solid cap management is really going to matter, and shrewd front offices are going to truly separate themselves. The business of sports always wins.
March 10, 2021 at 12:47 am in reply to: Rams own FAs & roster decisions & trade rumors (w/ a good post by db) #128275
znModeratorJourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
Not expecting any last-minute Rams tags today, as we previously reported. S John Johnson, OLB Leonard Floyd are on track for free agency.Not getting tagged doesn’t put a nail in either player’s journey with the Rams. Am expecting both to have great external opportunities – but in a year this strange, not tagging also opens VERY slim possibility that at the end of the cycle, you can re-sign short &under tag value.

znModeratorBefore his Cinderella season in 1999, @kurt13warner had to prove himself in NFL Europe in the Spring of 1998. pic.twitter.com/0LkdvWaebY
— NFL Throwback (@nflthrowback) March 9, 2021
March 9, 2021 at 8:13 pm in reply to: Rams own FAs & roster decisions & trade rumors (w/ a good post by db) #128268
znModeratorWhy John Johnson, Leonard Floyd weren’t tagged: Rams free agency tracker, grades, news
Jourdan Rodrigue
The Rams already opened the offseason with a blockbuster trade agreement of their franchise quarterback, but as free agency draws closer, they opted out of using the franchise tag on a couple of key defensive starters.
As Tuesday’s franchise tag deadline passed, the Rams chose not to apply it to either John Johnson III, their starting safety in 2020, or outside linebacker Leonard Floyd, who ranked second in sacks (10.5) last season. Only nine players received the tag this year; three safeties (Jets’ Marcus Maye, Saints’ Marcus Williams and Denver’s Justin Simmons), and no edge-rushers.
We knew, through our own previous reporting, that the tag was unlikely for any Rams player this spring — even less likely than the already-improbable scenario of a long-term extension for either. Tuesday, that became official.
The tag number for a safety is estimated to be around $10.5 million (as of the deadline, the actual salary cap had yet to be confirmed by the league, and tags are based in part on that valuation). Sure, the Rams felt that Johnson, especially last season, was a valuable member of their defense (he even called the signals for the top-ranked unit) — but as a part of their long-term financial plan, they simply do not invest in safeties outside of drafting and developing, or signing cheap veterans. Instead, higher-priority positions on defense are within the pass-rush, and at cornerback.
This is dictated, in part, by the way the league continues to move toward the passing game. Elite cornerbacks and pass-rushers become invaluable to counter that, and the Rams were particularly effective here in 2020, ranking first against the pass and in limiting explosive passing plays (and in total yards), while finishing second in sacks (53). The Rams have the bulk of their salary cap’s defensive allocations tied up in All-Pros Aaron Donald (DT) and Jalen Ramsey (CB), and will tender restricted free agent cornerback Darious Williams. Around Ramsey and Williams, the Rams’ strategy in the secondary has developed into the drafting of starting-caliber safeties in mid-to-late rounds (current depth includes Terrell Burgess, Jordan Fuller, Taylor Rapp and Nick Scott) and/or bringing in cheap veterans. They plug in extra cornerbacks in similar ways.
Because they have Donald, the three-time Defensive Player of the Year whose team-leading sack production and pressure rates often come from the interior, the Rams also get flexibility with how they can build their outside pass-rush. They have the ability to bring in outside linebackers on year-long, team-friendly and incentive-heavy deals that also are easy on their annual cap limitations. They seek out slightly under-the-radar players with good build, durability and upside as fits in their system — first, because they can get them on cheaper deals, and second, because of the Donald factor.
Donald draws so much attention from opposing blockers — who double-team him at a league-high 70 percent rate — that outside linebackers and other pass-rushers get an automatic single-block advantage on the majority of snaps.
Of course, Floyd breezed through his incentive clauses on a career season, and also proved to be an excellent addition against the run. For the Rams, Floyd may have extra leverage in understanding the lack of depth currently on the roster at outside linebacker. The three viable pass-rushers left, should Floyd depart in free agency, are Obo Okoronkwo (who has real potential but has also battled through a few injuries), third-year hybrid outside linebacker Justin Hollins (who was in a rotational role in 2020) and second-year rusher Terrell Lewis, who was sidelined by recurring knee issues during an otherwise very productive rookie season. And, Floyd has proof of production — plus is a fit for the style of pass-rusher new defensive coordinator Raheem Morris likes.
The Rams’ own leverage may come from real-world examples of players who left on longer deals elsewhere after a standout season. Outside linebacker Dante Fowler was replaced by Floyd when the former signed a three-year deal in Atlanta, but recorded just three sacks in 2020 and may even become a cap casualty. If they can’t re-sign Floyd, they’ll be in the mix for several of the many intriguing outside linebackers who are preparing to hit free agency — such as Romeo Okwara, Trey Hendrickson, Justin Houston and maybe even Haason Reddick, depending on how competitive that position gets.
Floyd is No. 18 in The Athletic’s free agent rankings this offseason, while Johnson is No. 23.
All through free agency, I’ll be providing analysis and grades for the moves the Rams do — or don’t — make via this tracker:
Not using the tag
There’s a difference here between “not retaining valuable players” (which always stinks) and “not using the tag”, the latter of which is a smart move by the Rams — not least because they simply cannot be investing a hard $10 million or more on their non-core positions. Tag money can’t be restructured on any sort of back end to ease the pressure in 2021, and the Rams (who are $20 million to $30 million over the cap) will be in the restructure/relief business as the new league year begins.
Would a tag-and-trade have worked? Perhaps, but some league insiders believe that teams may be holding on tighter to inherited, non-financial capital (like draft picks) in a year in which just about everybody is in debt. The Rams need draft picks — and didn’t have much leverage in a trade for a player like Johnson. Why would a team offer high draft picks if they didn’t have to, knowing that the Rams couldn’t, and wouldn’t, want to keep Johnson’s tag number on their books?
Both players will undoubtedly draw interest in free agency from teams who are now coached or run by former Rams personnel. Brad Holmes, who helped draft Johnson in the third round in 2017, is now the general manager in Detroit (and he’s got former Rams director of pro personnel Ray Agnew in the front office with him, too). Aubrey Pleasant, who formerly coached the Rams’ cornerbacks, is now the Lions’ secondary coach. Former Rams defensive coordinator Brandon Staley is now the head coach of the Chargers. Staley placed Johnson in his leadership role on the Rams’ defense, and raved about his communication abilities. A new head coach always tries to bring in one or two of “his guys” in his first few years, to communicate his system and his culture to the rest of the locker room. The Chargers will likely at least have a conversation with Floyd, too — the outside linebacker followed Staley from the Bears to the Rams in hopes of reviving his career (it worked!).
After the season he had, Floyd may be looking for as much as $12 million-$13 million per year. Over the Cap has him valued at $11.5 million per year, and the projected tag number for his position would even be well over that, at $17.8 million.
The safety market is notoriously and annually fickle, but one league source postulated that Johnson’s market could even get as high as $14 million per year — a sum the Rams certainly would not pay — and of course, much higher than the projected tag.
Yet for both players, my sense is that if the free agency market becomes too clogged for such deals as it floods with cuts and tough-decision free agents from cap-strained teams across the league, and then bottoms out, the Rams would be able to re-sign one or both on a short-term deal … well under the tag value.
znModeratorWhile teams are juggling pieces to create cap room, the #Patriots enter this offseason with $66M in cap space. That’s 3rd most in the NFL. They’re just starting. pic.twitter.com/8SCnGe2t5m
— NFL Update (@MySportsUpdate) March 9, 2021
March 9, 2021 at 3:06 pm in reply to: Rams own FAs & roster decisions & trade rumors (w/ a good post by db) #128264
znModeratordb
Had some down time and was able to catch up with my friend who is a long time Rams scout. He’s mainly focused on college player evals of course (which he can’t talk about and I don’t bother asking), but we did talk about existing Rams sleepers and here is what he passed on. Will all these guys make the leap, who knows, but they are ones to watch:
Eric Banks – when this UDFA made the 53 out of training camp, everyone said “who?” (including me). He’s a very powerful kid. He ended up back and forth from the practice squad, but they view him as a piece to the DL depth equation, particularly if they make a cap cut or trade (i.e. Brockers or Robinson) or don’t resign Fox. He’s better against the run right now than the pass, which is not unexpected.
Chandler Brewer – the year before last, he graded out as one of their top OL’s in the preseason. He can play guard or tackle. His game and build are similar to Edwards, not as powerful but with quicker feet. If they end up trading Havenstein, in large part its because they have Evans, but you don’t make that move if you don’t also have swing depth, and that is Brewer.
Triston Jackson – when an UDFA makes the 53 and stays there for the entire season without playing but never gets released to the PS, its obviously a dead giveaway that they really like this kid and other teams do too. He caught a lot of deep balls at Syracuse. He’s not a straight burner per se, but has good game speed and route talent, and they are not resigning Reynolds.
From a FA perspective, this is not earth shattering news, but he said there will be a few restructures and cuts, potentially more cuts than anticipated, because there will be lots of FA’s out there in the middle/end of the free agency period looking for a deals of any kind, so they think they’ll be able to fill holes with team friendly contracts. Also, don’t completely rule out a tag on JJ if they can restructure enough existing contracts, although he’ll be pissed.
From a draft perspective, again not earth shattering and he can’t go into specifics, but they are anticipating much greater variability than normal since its harder to grade prospects with the lack of film, interviews, combine. etc., and they think the other teams’ grades and draft boards will be all over the place. Their strategy will be BPA but centered in the early rounds around certain positions, he mentioned edge in particular – with Floyd likely gone, Ebukam likely gone, Lewis a question mark with injuries, its their number 1 hole by a long shot. If they had to play tomorrow, they have or could get a center quickly/cheaply, and they have enough at ILB (Howard is back and he also mentioned Rozeboom as a sleeper), but who is going to start at either OLB?
Anyway, not saying I agree with all of the above, just passing on the info.
March 9, 2021 at 12:40 pm in reply to: Rams own FAs & roster decisions & trade rumors (w/ a good post by db) #128263
znModeratorMichael Brockers is reportedly on the trade block. If the Rams deal him, what could they get in return?
Unfortunately, probably not much. Interior D-linemen haven’t fetched a lot of value in recent years https://t.co/D8mfnhmx3L
— Cameron DaSilva (@camdasilva) March 9, 2021
znModeratorGolladay is what all Rams fans hoped Josh Reynolds would have been. https://t.co/SnPto4yi9D
— SeattleRams (@seattlerams_nfl) March 9, 2021
March 9, 2021 at 10:22 am in reply to: (pre-draft): off-season rankings and progress reports #128260
znModeratorfrom https://www.footballoutsiders.com/four-downs/2021/four-downs-nfc-west
Los Angeles Rams
Biggest Need: Secondary
Really, the biggest need here should read “cap space” (the Rams are more than $34 million over the cap, per Over The Cap) or “draft picks” (after trades for Jalen Ramsey and Matthew Stafford, the Rams don’t have another first-round pick until 2024), but on the field, general manager Les Snead is charged with rebuilding a secondary for new defensive coordinator Raheem Morris. Three of the four L.A. defensive backs who played at least 800 defensive snaps last year will soon be free agents.
The good news is the one that is staying is Jalen Ramsey, the two-time All-Pro cornerback. But the three who could be leaving include:
– Safety John Johnson, who led the team in defensive snaps (1,024) and tackles (105) and got our vote for the All-Pro team;
– Cornerback Troy Hill, a 16-game starter in 2020 who led the NFL in both yardage (119) and touchdowns (two) on interception returns and gave up only 24.3 yards per game in coverage, sixth-lowest among corners with more than 10 starts;
– and Darious Williams, who started 10 games at corner and finished third at the position in success rate (63.9%) despite seeing an average target depth of 16.8 yards, deepest in the NFL.Williams at least will be a restricted free agent, which makes him the most likely to stay in town, but that’s just going to add to the Rams’ salary cap burden.
Major Free Agents: John Johnson, S; Troy Hill, CB; Darious Williams, CB; Leonard Floyd, ER; Samson Ebukam, ER; Josh Reynolds, WR; Austin Blythe, C; Gerald Everett, TE
As if losing most of their coverage men wasn’t bad enough, The Rams could also lose their top two edge rushers in Leonard Floyd and Samson Ebukam. Floyd is the real prize here, with 10.5 sacks in his first year in L.A. after 18.5 in four years with the Bears. Ebukam started 14 games, but played less than.half of the team’s defensive snaps in 12 of them.
The Rams also have three major contributors on offense hitting the market, but each plays in a position of depth. They have Van Jefferson, a second-round rookie last year, ready to step in for Josh Reynolds and his 52-618-2 statline. The departure of Gerald Everett should just mean more targets for Tyler Higbee, ninth in DYAR last season and top-20 in that category for three years in a row. Austin Blythe would be the biggest loss—he has started 47 of 48 games the last three years at both left guard and center—but the Rams also have Brian Allen, who started nine games at center for them in 2019.
znModeratorOne league source on the Dak Prescott deal: "You know what this is? This is Jerry Jones tipping off the extraordinary TV deal that is coming."
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) March 9, 2021
znModeratorCooper Kupp has the 2nd-highest grade of any WR on third down since 2019 https://t.co/D4G2Nfl70L
— Rams Wire (@TheRamsWire) March 9, 2021
znModerator𝒥𝒾𝓂 𝐸𝓋𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓉𝓉@Jim_Everett
Be prepared for most #nfl teams to make a few “not so popular” player cut/trade decisions since the 2020’s salary cap of $198.2M drops to $185M this year for 2021.The $13.2 difference will come from one or two restructures or contract(s) releases.
znModeratorNothing says “unity” like the entire staff of the Democratic Party in Nevada quitting after Dem socialists won every seat. https://t.co/B6su4sHnw5
— Kathryn Rose Fisher (@kayrosef) March 9, 2021
znModeratorEd Werder@WerderEdESPN
The #Cowboys announce they have reached contract agreement with QB Dak Prescott. That means he will not charge $37.7M against the cap as if he had played on franchise tag.
znModeratorFor owners, too much is never enough. So why do players gets squeezed by fans and media to take less? https://t.co/xoT0x3Dgz3
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) March 8, 2021
znModerator
znModerator
March 8, 2021 at 12:06 pm in reply to: Rams own FAs & roster decisions & trade rumors (w/ a good post by db) #128242
znModeratorReport: Michael Brockers is available for trade, and the Rams are getting calls about Robert Woods https://t.co/78CVshohQv
— Rams Wire (@TheRamsWire) March 8, 2021
znModeratorNFL passer rating when under pressure (min. 90 pressured dropbacks):
Matthew Stafford – 91.8 (2nd) pic.twitter.com/p0WFuTKPDe
— PFF LA Rams (@PFF_Rams) March 7, 2021
znModeratorAnalysis: NFL’s very rich owners about to get much more rich
https://sports.yahoo.com/analysis-nfls-very-rich-owners-204857754.html
There are some very rich people about to get a whole lot richer. Who else but NFL owners?
Probably within the next week, those 32 multi-millionaires/billionaires will see their future earnings increase exponentially. The league is on the verge of extending its broadcast deals with its current partners, and with a new full-time rights holder in Amazon likely acquiring streaming rights.
The astronomical numbers figure to double in many cases, displaying once more that despite a pandemic, lower ratings for the 2020 season, and the waves of viewers finding alternate ways to watch games, the NFL is the most desirable of all commodities for broadcasters.
“There is so much interest in the NFL coming back in broadcasting and digital and all the ancillary programming and fantasy leagues and sports gambling,” says Marc Ganis, co-founder of Chicago-based consulting group Sportscorp and a confidant of many NFL owners. “Nobody wants to leave the NFL right now.”That’s particularly evident when it comes to television. Though the networks, mainly Disney-owned ESPN/ABC, may have balked at the rights fees the NFL is seeking over the next decade, they also pretty much are swallowing hard and ponying up.
ESPN spent the most in the current deal at $1.9 billion annually — increased to $2 billion once it got a wild-card playoff game. That provided it the Monday night showcase and the playoff representation. The league is eager for some of the Monday nighters to land on free-to-air ABC, while Disney is even more eager to get back into the Super Bowl mix on ABC.
The price tag probably won’t approach $2 billion per season, but it will increase substantially. And only ESPN’s deal ends after the upcoming season; the rest go through 2022.
Fox currently has a Sunday afternoon package of primarily NFC games and the Thursday night package at $1.76 billion per year. Amazon — with cable’s NFL Network, owned by the league — is in line to grab the prime-time portion, but Fox’s fee for the Sunday games could double from $1.1 billion.
CBS, which once had the Thursday night package, is paying $1 billion a year for the Sunday afternoon AFC-dominated telecasts and also seems headed for doubling that.NBC, which has next February’s Super Bowl — potentially in the middle of the Winter Olympics that the network also broadcasts — has been paying $950 million a year for the prized Sunday night deal. That, too, could double in rights fees.
Amazon’s buy-in is projected in the $1 billion range. And then there’s the DirecTV Sunday Ticket package of out-of-town telecasts, which is at $1.5 billion annually and figures to jump to $2 billion or so — with several bidders lined up.
So, from $7.185 billion a year to, say, $12 billion is in the ballpark.
Why is the league so eager to get the broadcast extensions done now? The NFL’s business year begins March 17.
Well, most stadiums were fully empty for all of 2020, and team expenses skyrocketed during the pandemic-impacted season. The loss of incoming revenues means a reduced salary cap this year (to about $183 million), and would have heavily impacted future caps without the upcoming tidal wave of rights fees profits.
There’s also the financial security the new contracts will provide. Not that Jerry Jones or Robert Kraft needs to worry where his next dollar is coming from. But they soon will know where their next millions of dollars are coming from.
The players, who wisely agreed to a new labor deal a year ago before the COVID-19 pandemic hit full force, will see the fruits of that pact throughout the decade. Not this year, when the new broadcast deals won’t have much effect. But definitely down the road paved with gold.
And despite how much they will be shelling out, the broadcast partners will benefit. Just look at the TV ratings for 2020, the newsiest of years with the pandemic; a stormy presidential election campaign and aftermath; and a racial and social awakening in America. Yes, the number of eyeballs watching on television dropped for the NFL, but the league still brought in an average of 15.6 million television and digital viewers during the regular season, according to the league and Nielsen.
As general managers or coaches like to say after making a trade, “It’s a win/win for everyone.” In this case, that’s almost certainly true.===
Amazon to Partner With the NFL for Exclusive Game Broadcasts
Many football games would appear on Prime Video if the deal goes through.https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/04/amazon-to-partner-with-the-nfl-for-exclusive-game/
Inside sources told The Wall Street Journal Wednesday afternoon that the NFL and giant technology company Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) are in the process of working out a deal for exclusive game broadcasting on Prime Video. While the details are still being worked out, the new plans could be finalized sometime during the week of March 8, according to the unnamed sources.
Amazon is specifically zeroing in on the NFL’s Thursday night games. Many of these games, under the terms of the agreement, would thereafter appear only on Prime Video and on local television networks in the area where the game is being played. Fidelity notes even if the partnership is finalized, Amazon won’t gain exclusive Thursday night game broadcast rights until some point following the 2022 season, when Fox Corporation’s (NASDAQ:FOX) broadcasting contract for those games ends.March 7, 2021 at 12:30 pm in reply to: Rams own FAs & roster decisions & trade rumors (w/ a good post by db) #128230
znModeratorRams salary-cap casualty? Andrew Whitworth knows the ‘nature of our business’
GARY KLEIN
https://www.latimes.com/sports/rams/story/2021-03-07/andrew-whitworth-rams-jared-goff-free-agency
Three years ago, for a tour of still-under-construction SoFi Stadium, Rams players boarded buses that ferried them down a hill and onto a dusty surface that would eventually become the immaculate playing field.
Offensive lineman Andrew Whitworth, 36 at the time, exited a bus and marveled at the work in progress. Then he turned to Jared Goff, joking that he looked forward to sitting in the stands or a suite and watching the young quarterback play when the $5-billion stadium was completed.Last Monday, standing in a stadium parking lot, Whitworth reflected on the tour.
“I never thought there’d be a chance in the world I would walk out the tunnel in this stadium,” he said.Whitworth, a 15-year NFL veteran, is preparing for a possible fifth season with the Rams — his second playing in SoFi Stadium, site of next season’s Super Bowl. And for the first time since signing as a free agent with the Rams in 2017, Whitworth is on track to protect the blindside of an established quarterback other than Goff.
In January, two weeks after their NFC divisional-round playoff defeat by the Green Bay Packers, the Rams traded Goff and two first-round draft picks to the Detroit Lions for veteran quarterback Matthew Stafford. The deal will not become official until the new league year begins March 17.
Whitworth’s status for the 2021 season also is awaiting official determination. In March 2020, the four-time Pro Bowl selection signed a three-year, $30-million contract that included $12.5 million in guarantees, according to overthecap.com. Whitworth started nine games last season before suffering torn knee ligaments. He sat out the last seven games and returned for the playoffs. He carries a cap number of $11.2 million this season.
Revenue lost by NFL teams because of the COVID-19 pandemic will cause the salary cap to drop from $198 million in 2020 to no lower than $180 million this season, though a final figure has not been determined.
“The plan is to prepare myself to play and to plan to be back,” Whitworth, 39, said after speaking at a news conference to open the Los Angeles Unified School District’s COVID-19 vaccination site. “But obviously, I have no idea what’s going to happen with our salary-cap situation. … You go through the offseason, you make sure you check off all the things that are feeling good and doing great.
“So, it’s a longer process than probably saying, ‘Hey, I’m back.’ It means I’m committed to being back and that’s the plan. Obviously, there’s a lot of work between now and then that has to go into that on a lot of different facets.”
Rams general manager Les Snead said after last season that Whitworth was “a freak of nature” and that the Rams wanted him to return. “In terms of his production on the field, I haven’t seen any more drop off,” Snead said. “Again, like all these decisions, there’s variables to be discussed within that.”The Rams made a major decision when they decided to part ways with Goff, the top pick in the 2016 draft. After Goff helped lead the Rams to the Super Bowl in 2018, they rewarded him with an extension that included $110 million in guarantees.
“I try to explain to me people that ask me around town, it’s like every August I show up I’m looking around the room like, ‘Oh yeah, that’s right this guy’s not here anymore. Oh, that’s right, he left in free agency.’”
But immediately after last season ended, coach Sean McVay cryptically said Goff was the Rams quarterback “right now.” Snead said he was the team’s quarterback “in this moment.”Asked if players were surprised by the trade, Whitworth indicated there were clues. “After hearing some of the press conferences and understanding kind of where we stood as a team, and what things were being said, you knew that there’s obviously some things there where it’s an open door for whatever,” Whitworth said. “So, I mean, you’re more just shocked at the timing and how fast that whole thing came about and all of those type things.
“So, I think as players you’re shocked by it, but I think it’s less shocking to the players only because that’s the nature of what we do. I try to explain to people that ask me around town, it’s like every August I show up I’m looking around the room like, ‘Oh yeah, that’s right this guy’s not here anymore. Oh, that’s right, he left in free agency“That’s the nature of our business. We’re used to a different face every year. So, when you play that last game, one of the reasons guys are usually so upset when that last game happens is they’re like, ‘Man, this group of guys, I probably won’t ever play with again. And that usually holds true. It’s pretty rare when it’s not.”
Whitworth said that he and Goff became close through the years and that they would remain so.
“I’ll be there supporting him and wishing him nothing but the best,” he said.Stafford, 33, has played 12 NFL seasons since the Lions selected him with in 2009 with the No. 1 pick in the draft. Whitworth said he has known Stafford for a while. They met through Clint Boling, Whitworth’s former Cincinnati Bengals teammate who blocked for Stafford in college at Georgia.
“We all play golf,” Whitworth said. “So, I already knew Matt pretty well. I think that will be a pretty easy transition and, obviously, he’s a heck of a football player.” A new quarterback is not the only change for Rams. There are several new assistant coaches, including offensive line coach Kevin Carberry, who replaces Aaron Kromer.
“It’s what the Rams felt is best — and there’s a couple other things that have gone that way this offseason,” Whitworth said. “So, whatever they think is best is what they’re doing, and you’ve just got to do your best to be a part of it.”Whitworth, nominated multiple times for the NFL’s Walter Payton man of the year award for his community and charitable work, has been at the forefront of several initiatives with the Rams and is regarded as a team leader. He said he feels “great” physically and is working to strengthen areas of his knee that might have been weakened by last season’s injury.
Last season, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers became the first team to win a Super Bowl in their home stadium. The Rams are aiming to duplicate the feat.
From the parking lot, with the massive stadium in view, Whitworth sounded optimistic.
“It will be really special to have the opportunity to play the season, being my 16th season, where I have the opportunity to turn 40 and also be a left tackle in the NFL, which is pretty rare,” Whitworth said. “So, there’s a lot of things on the horizon and, obviously, a lot of goals, so it gives us plenty to be excited about and to work toward.”
znModeratorYeah that was a good interview.
I like how Ramsey couldn’t come up with an answer to the question, what was the craziest thing AD did that you saw in a game. Ramsey was like, there’s something every game.
-
AuthorPosts

