Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 47,011 through 47,040 (of 47,920 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: And turning to the Vikes game #6033
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/setting-up-the-vikes-game/

    ADRIAN PETERSON:

    “What I do remember about that game is that it’s first time in eight years, I’ve ever talked off to players,” Peterson said in a conference call with St. Louis reporters on Wednesday. “Those guys had me so hot; like, I haven’t ever been that mad playing football. Those guys were just running to the ball — I love it, too — but (they) were just yapping at the mouth. I’m talking about from the defensive front to the second level to the secondary. Those guys were just yapping”

    I don;t like that aspect of the Rams. The big yappers thing.

    in reply to: Fisher, Hill – 9/03 … transcripts #6029
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I still just can’t figure how a sports reporter who is meant to cover a sport can’t quickly do some background and not ask really asinine questions.

    Yeah, the last thing you need is to be corrected by the guy you’re interviewing on a simple fact that exists in the public record.

    Arizona reporter in 2008: Mr. Warner, this is your first superbowl, correct?

    Warner: uh, well,…

    There’s also the question where you know you’re not going to get an answer. So, for example, coach, do you think having GR learning two positions slowed his progress?

    Under what conditions is he ever going to affirm that view?

    Fisher: Yes. Yes I do. In fact that’s why we did it.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Gordon’s breakdown (first post in this thread) is about as thorough and you can get with this kind of thing, but he has a kind of chippy pessimism I don’t enjoy.

    in reply to: Setting up the vikes game…multimedia #6016
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Peterson returns to site of big day vs. Rams

    By Ben Goessling

    http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/138589/peterson-returns-to-site-of-big-day-vs-rams

    EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The first carry of Adrian Peterson’s 2013 season saw him break free for a 78-yard touchdown. The first of the 2014 season will come in the building where he recorded the longest run of his career the last time he visited.

    The Minnesota Vikings’ previous trip to St. Louis came in Week 15 of the 2012 season, in a game the Vikings had to win to keep themselves in the playoff race. Peterson was in the middle of a transcendent stretch, having logged at least 100 yards in his previous seven games and gaining 210 two weeks before in Green Bay. The Rams game, though, turned out to be Peterson’s best of the season; he ran for 212 yards on 24 carries, with 82 of them coming on a touchdown run that helped him get the last word over a defense Peterson said had him in a foul mood that day.

    “What I do remember about that game is that it’s first time in eight years, I’ve ever talked off to players,” Peterson said in a conference call with St. Louis reporters on Wednesday. “Those guys had me so hot; like, I haven’t ever been that mad playing football. Those guys were just running to the ball — I love it, too — but (they) were just yapping at the mouth. I’m talking about from the defensive front to the second level to the secondary. Those guys were just yapping and they were doing pretty good initially, kind of getting a couple tackles for loss, a couple of three-and-outs. And then when I gunned at them one time, it got real quiet. I’m not going to give you my hint. I hope they come in talking a lot of noise this time, too. I’m excited to play these guys.”

    Sunday’s game should be a good opening test for Peterson against an aggressive Rams defense that was ninth in the league against the run last season while posting 53 sacks. The Rams took down opposing quarterbacks on 10.2 percent of their dropbacks, which was tied for the second-highest rate in the league, according to ESPN Stats & Information, and pressure from the St. Louis front four could make Peterson a safety valve for Matt Cassel, through his new role in the passing game and delayed handoffs designed to take advantage of aggressive fronts.

    “I think they do a tremendous job up front creating pressure, making you get the ball out quick, make quick decisions at the quarterback position,” Cassel said. “I think it’s going to be a big task for us this week to take care of that front and be able to let me get the ball out and I think that these guys will be up for the challenge.”

    Peterson didn’t play at all in the preseason, and has seemed eager to get his first game action in the Vikings’ new offense after a long stretch of non-contact work. “He welcomes contact even when he’s running and doing those thing,” Cassel said. “You can see that he doesn’t shy away from it and it’s almost the defender’s responsibility to get out of the way. I think that that’s how he’s got to practice and that’s how he plays no matter what the situation and that’s good because once he gets to the season I think that’s why he’s ready to go.”

    He’ll have a little extra edge playing against a Rams defense that brought out the best in him last time.

    “They have some guys that can get to the ball, to the passer and they run to the ball well,” Peterson said. “I know Coach Zimmer would love that type of defense. I’m excited to play those guys.”

    in reply to: board exchange 9/03 #6001
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    >zn wrote:

    &21Dog wrote:
    How do I contact a mod on this site?

    You know that’s a good question…meaning I realized when you asked that that, in fact, we had not supplied that information. I will add something about that to the original post in this thread.

    I am a mod–through PM. Or you can make it public, here. The other mods are Herzog, InvaderRam, and Mack.

    Just wanted to apologize for the response last night which caused a thread to be closed.

    Not usually my style. Sorry for cluttering the board with that kind of stuff.

    It’s cool 21. Stuff happens. It’s classy to apologize, but I know you from way back, and I don’t think of you as a problem (far from it)…you’re always welcome in these parts. Post on, and go Rams.

    in reply to: board exchange 9/03 #5998
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    How do I contact a mod on this site?

    You know that’s a good question…meaning I realized when you asked that that, in fact, we had not supplied that information. I will add something about that to the original post in this thread.

    I am a mod–through PM. Or you can make it public, here. The other mods are Herzog, InvaderRam, and Mack.

    in reply to: Rams' 10-Man Practice Squad #5997
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from the PD

    ==
    The Rams have made a change on the practice squad, waiving safety Matt Daniels and adding tight end Brad Smelley.

    in reply to: roster #5985
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I didn’t think about it before, but they kept 6 corners. (Along with 3 safeties, though Joyner must cover at FS).

    I doubt they keep 6 corners all year. So my bet is, when both Johnson and Bailey are back, one of the corners goes. He then, I would think, replaces someone on the PS.

    in reply to: Irsay #5982
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cringe … *hear me out, not here me out. Geez.

    Fixt.

    in reply to: So, what is our O-line for this Sunday? #5980
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    As much as I’m disappointed that Robinson isn’t deemed ready to start yet, I’m glad that the coaches aren’t throwing him out there for the sole reason that he was a high draft choice. I’m also happy that Joseph is ready to go.

    But, I do worry about Jake Long and the LT position in general. If Robinson is the backup, I’m afraid that we have a guy who looks old at LT backed up by a guy who is too green for prime time.

    I think Saffold backs up LOT. GR presumably would go in at guard in place of Saffold?

    in reply to: How the season SHOULD go… #5966
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’ll leave this here for all you Pollyannas

    ==

    I will take a more indirect approach.

    Another classic, also orchestrated:

    ==

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    He is young and comes from a limited offense. He is almost another Quick. imo

    Robby is on track to be a great OL…. Robby looked very good at LOT. I saw him give up part of a sack once, late in the half. But generally his pass blocking was sound: he’d have his guy walled off while the rest of the OL was being over-run. And his run blocking really is impressive. He can drive the DL, but he also gets to the 2nd level and blows LBs backward. Tell you what … right now I’d just as soon start him over Jake the Fraud Long.

    Just reinforcing all that:

    RockRam

    I watched all the preseason games at least twice, and some 3 times, focusing on different people and units.

    GRob is a beast! He throws 330 lb. Dlinemen around with one arm (I’m not exaggerating).

    His problem is he makes mistakes. He blocks the wrong guy. Misses assignments.
    But physically, he’s not movable on Pass Pro, and he moves his guy wherever he wants to on run plays.

    It’s the mental part of the game and certain technique issues.
    He’s an entirely different animal that J. Smith who was 30 lbs smaller and soft.

    Before the draft, this issue was known.
    The question all draft analysts asked was: which is better. To get a plug and play guy like Matthews that has a low ceiling but a high floor? Or get a guy who will need technique and assignment work who has a HOF ceiling?

    If you will note, it is Fisher’s and Snead’s spoken philosophy to always go for the higher ceiling.
    That’s what the did and I suspect they don’t regret it.

    Just remember: Oline is tough in the NFL. Warmack and Cooper have struggled mightily even in their 2nd year.
    And neither of those were asked to practice equally between LT and LG.

    GRob is going to be fine. But it might be mid point this year.
    Right now, Saffold and Joseph are simply better.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Nonsense.

    Everyone takes time to learn to play OL in the pros.

    And Robby is on track to be a great OL.

    Yeah, plus as I said elsewhere, Boudreau has rarely if ever started a rookie OL in week 1 and that goes back years and years.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Fisher is not in trouble. He has a 5 year deal with an owner who has shown in the past that he hires veteran coaches, lets them run things, and does not sweat the short-term speedbump stuff.

    And they’re not “questionable picks.” Week 1 of year 1 of a pick is way, way, way too early to make judgements like that (and besides you’re wrong about that anyway).

    Toughen up dude. Don’t sweat the small stuff.

    Boudreau rarely if EVER starts rookie linemen early in the season and that’s going back YEARS. If nothing else that’s why they signed Joseph. They’re covered.

    in reply to: Of all 32 #NFL starting QBs: 17 were first-round picks #5932
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I was just funnin’ with ya. I knew it wasn’t that cut and dried…

    Actually I posted my thing without being aware of your response. I was just responding to Caplan. It took time to write and then when I posted, there you were.

    All of which is beside the point.

    Cause, we crossed the line, unintentionally or not.

    Yes. Tragically, and like it or not…

    it’s a board war.

    g

    in reply to: Of all 32 #NFL starting QBs: 17 were first-round picks #5915
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I don’t agree with him. If you want to examine how qbs are acquired, you need to also look at free agency and trades.

    For example, Manning may have been picked in the first round, but that’s not how Denver acquired him.

    It looks different if you factor in how teams acquire qbs. So I am counting free agency and trades.

    I only count starters as of this week.

    High 1st round pick (10 and above): Tannenhill, Luck, Locker, Rivers, Eli, Griffin3, Stafford, Newton, Ryan
    Lower 1st round pick:Roethlisberger,Rodgers,Flacco, Manuel,
    2nd: G.Smith, Dalton, Carr, Kaepernick
    3rd round: Foles, Wilson

    4th-7th round: Brady
    UDFA: Romo

    Free agency: Hoyer, Fitzpatrick, Henne, Cassel, Brees, McCown,Hill,Manning
    Trade: A.Smith, Cutler, Palmer

    13 in the first round (high and low combined).
    11 in free agency or trades

    Or further divided:

    9 high in the 1st round
    10 lower in round 1 + rounds 2 and 3
    11 in free agency or trades

    It all depends on how you want to count it.

    • This reply was modified 12 years ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: Outage … #5907
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Geez, I was gettin ready to pack up the tent and the camel to move to the next watering hole… ;)

    No need.

    THIS is our watering hole.

    Drink up.

    x

    in reply to: audio – Lillibridge, JT, Sando #5898
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cusumano has it in his head that Bradford was this huge liability (ie. he thought that before the injury). I don’t get that.

    in reply to: Very, very quick takes, PS Game 4 #5895
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    That’s a pretty good take I think.

    Admittedly, given the way they used game 4 this time (no starters), it’s like a thorough and conscientious restaurant review of a breakfast diner. Still. I especially like your take on the DBs. To me you sum it up nicely.

    in reply to: Quinn must be smiling #5860
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Robert Quinn ‏@RQuinn94 8m
    Congrats to @JJWatt on the new luxurious extension…#WellDeserved

    He forgot to add “yes!…bwa ha ha….

    in reply to: test #5857
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>zn wrote:</div>
    test

    test 2

    test 3

    in reply to: test #5856
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    test

    test 2

    in reply to: Quinn must be smiling #5845
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    J.J. Watts signed his contract extension:

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24691270/report-texans-jj-watt-agree-to-terms-on-6-year-100-million-extension

    J.J. Watt said in mid-August that it would be “great” to get an extension done with the Texans before the regular season started and it looks like the team listened. According to the Houston Chronicle, Watt and the Texans have agreed to terms on a six-year extension worth up to $100 million.

    That total includes $51.876 million in guaranteed money, making Watt the highest paid defensive player in the NFL. The previous high for a defensive player was Mario Williams’ six-year, $96 million deal with Buffalo that included $50 million in guarantees.

    Watt will be getting a substantial raise in his new contract.

    Under the terms of his rookie deal, the 11th overall pick in the 2011 NFL Draft was set to make a total of $8.1 million over the final two years of his contract. Watt was scheduled to earn $1.9 million in 2014 and $6.9 million in 2015.

    Yeah Quinn will get easily that much.

    .

    in reply to: Burwell: Fear of distraction might slow Sam's search for team #5838
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    According to several NFL sources, they readily admitted that the ESPN report by Josina Anderson last week where she asked players about Sam’s shower habits in the locker room “did him no favors.”

    s

    in reply to: Rams get QB Case Keenum #5835
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from the Jim Thomas (just prior to this:

    “I don’t think he really fits what the Rams do,” said a veteran scout Monday, speaking on the condition of anonymity. . . . “Now, he’s brilliant. He is frighteningly smart. He’ll have their playbook down in two weeks. He gets rid of the ball very fast. But he has a below-average arm. I think he’s a very good NFL backup. He’s a better athlete than he gets credit for.”

    .

    Well. That’s interesting.

    .

    in reply to: Rams get QB Case Keenum #5831
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I could be wrong, but Keenum
    dont seem like a safe ‘game manager’ type.
    Seems like a bit of a gunslinger.

    Is that a good match for this team?

    w
    v

    He has very good downfield accuracy…54% on passes of 31 yards or over. That’s better than everyone else, I think. But he makes up for it by having below average accuracy in the 1-10 yard range.

    BTW I can’t believe no one remembers this.

    YOu know who he had his first career game against, right? He replaced Schaub during a game…and then was the starter.

    Who was that against.

    Hint: their team name is “the Rams.”

    in reply to: Rams get QB Case Keenum #5829
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Ok, well then, How come he DOESNT
    know Brian S’s system? Answer me that.

    Now Schott’s system is the 3rd is he going to learn. First WCO, like Shurmur. Then…O’Brien, who has the same system McD does. Schott makes 3.

    Kind of spooky, hunh, if you think about it….

    in reply to: Rams get QB Case Keenum #5827
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Btw, how does Keenum know Brian Shottenheimer’s system?

    He doesn’t. You misread. Probably deliberately. Just to cause trouble.

    in reply to: Rams get QB Case Keenum #5823
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    another view from around the net

    ===

    westCoastRam

    Keenum is what he is. I think we saw his ceiling last year, a spot starter that might be able to steal you a game or two. Possibly a bridge quarterback. I think anything else is a pipe-dream.

    I do think it was a great move to give us a shot to not just bomb games if Hill gets hurt. But that’s all his is, a chance at competitiveness.

    Hill’s a workable starter.

    Keenum is behind him.

    in reply to: Rams get QB Case Keenum #5820
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    OK, who did they let go to get him?

    Jim Thomas @jthom1
    Rams place Justice Cunningham (ankle) on IR; that frees up spot for Keenum.

Viewing 30 posts - 47,011 through 47,040 (of 47,920 total)