Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 36,331 through 36,360 (of 47,798 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: playoff record should help Warner reach Hall of Fame #64483
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Thomas still has access to people who make these Hall of fame articles more than just standard fare (including the one on Bruce which is still on this page). So we have new, direct quotes from guys like Armey and Martz, and then of course with this one, from Warner himself. So it’s not like reading an article that is really nothing but recycled quotes from the public domain. Something new shows up in them.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    If Jay-Z says you go somewhere, you go there.

    If so I agree, then Gurley should not have him as a player agent.

    Your agent is not supposed to order you around in ways that cost you in terms of your football career.

    You may not see a problem in that but I see several.

    .

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I agree ZN a combination of many things . Gurley doesn’t get a pass but if coaching knew about it and did nothing they share responsibility. In 2015 the big games he had came in the second half from what I remember so that indicates to me conditioning was a factor unless we were losing by 20 points and running the ball wasn’t an option.

    I dunno, what could they do about it? Except tell him to get in better shape.

    in reply to: coach hire thread #2 (from 1/23 – ?) #64473
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    While I can believe Gurley contributed they did start to stop him in 2015 and that same offense was shit.

    If he was not in the same shape or condition in 2016 (and all reports are he wasn’t) then that is a significant part of it.

    There’s another thing. Subtract his big runs in 2015 and his YPC is pedestrian. Well, 2016 subtracted his big runs.

    I think it was a combination of things. Gurley is part of it.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    So maybe some of the flaws in Gurley’s game that people have been talking about this season (poor vision – not seeing the holes, impatience, etc) have always been there but last year they were mitigated by the occasional long runs and second half blocking adjustments by Cigs.

    That’s possible.

    I just remember that we used to worry about SJ in roughly similar ways early in his career until he seemed to hit his groove plus they gameplanned for what he was.

    .

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    One of the biggest difference between TG’s 100 yard games in 2015 and the later not-100 yard games is long runs. Most of those came in the 2nd half as the team adjusted to how defenses were defending against the run. I think Cigs had a knack for that in ways Boras didn’t. This also shows up in points per quarter—the 2016 Rams were fine that way in the 1st quarter and from the 2nd quarter on plummeted to the bottom of the league in ranking.

    I think it is also entirely clear that TG contributed to this. This is not the first time we heard that he was not as dedicated in the off-season as he was in 2015. He visibly lost some weight, strength, and explosion.

    To me all this is a perfect cluster storm of combined causes. IMO the people trying to narrow it to one cause are generally missing the whole picture. BTW that’s not aimed at other posters in this thread. I don’t see you guys as doing that.

    .

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    That’s not possible though.

    Cause, if it were true, that would mean…corruption.

    And what are the chances of that.

    in reply to: Believe it or not it's time. THE SENIOR BOWL THREAD #64448
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Senior Bowl: Mike Mayock’s Day 1 practice stars

    Mike Mayock

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000778827/article/senior-bowl-mike-mayocks-day-1-practice-stars

    MOBILE, Ala. — Senior Bowl week is always my favorite week of the year. I love watching the nation’s top seniors compete in live practices. Tuesday was the start of three straight practice days, and there were plenty of players who made quick impressions. Here are five that stood out to me on Day 1:

    Cooper Kupp, WR, Eastern Washington
    I like this kid. He had 22 catches, including six touchdowns, against two Pac-12 teams in his college career at EWU. He can play at any level; don’t let the small school fool you. What I saw on tape is what I saw Tuesday. He’s fast. He won deep, he won shallow, he beat press coverage. He can win at all three levels. And he gets it. I think he’s going to play and play well very early in his NFL career.

    Forrest Lamp, LT, Western Kentucky
    The best single tape in the last five years that I’ve seen against Alabama’s defensive front was Lamp’s. When they measured him here in the morning, his arm length was just over 30 inches. That’s short, and a reason why there’s so much talk about moving him inside to guard, perhaps even center. He reminds me of Zack Martin or Joel Bitonio — guys who were dominating left tackles in college but got kicked inside in the NFL, and still remained really good players. He had a very solid day.

    Dan Feeney, OL, Indiana
    Feeney and Lamp will both be in the conversation of who’s going to be the No. 1 interior offensive linemen in this draft. I’m going to have fun watching them compete all week. They certainly competed in their first practice here. Going into the season, many had Feeney as the No. 1 interior offensive lineman, but when he got back from an early season concussion, he was moved to tackle and played out of position, so there’s mixed opinions on him among scouts. But he had a solid start to this week, especially when he shot his hands inside.

    Tanoh Kpassagnon, DE, Villanova
    He’s really fascinating to me. There was a buzz around him in the scouting community before this week and I think it will pick up even more steam coming out. He was impressive in the morning weigh-in with a ready-made NFL body. And he competed at a high level when he hit the field. When you come from a small school like Villanova you have something to prove, and he did on Day 1, with his effort and toughness. He’s raw but had a lot of upside.

    Montravius Adams, DT, Auburn
    When he keeps his pad level down he can be a monster inside. You don’t see many people with that size with those type of movement skills. He’s got superior short-area quickness and comes off the ball both in the run and the pass game. In the one-on-one drills nobody could block him on Day 1. He was dominant.

    in reply to: "I asked my student why he voted for Trump" #64432
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The only difference is that there would be a soporific quality about it.

    We’ll never agree on this Mack. Which is fine.

    What we will get with Trump…ARE getting with Trump…is not only far worse than any other alternative, it’s even worse than we have yet imagined.

    And that’s not being said by a dem apologist.

    That’s worse in every area. Foreign. Domestic. Cultural. Economic.

    We may just have to agree to disagree on this.

    All I know is that I am living under both LePage and Trump, and if Trump gets ousted, then it’s Pence.

    in reply to: Jack Youngblood: "I Retired Because I Was Fired" #64423
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The Rams and Shaw never let me develop into the administration structure as Carroll and I had discussed. I was put in charge of some corporate sales, did Rams radio, but my goal was to be someone who made decisions as to the team, to have a hand in running a franchise, similar to what Ozzie (Newsome) is doing in Baltimore.

    “For five or six years I’d wait my turn, wait for John (Shaw) to involve me more. But it just didn’t happen.

    I actually think that if JY had developed into a kind of Elway-like administrative figure over the years, the team would have been better off for it.

    in reply to: Transcript, Trump interview with ABC News Jan 25, 2017 #64422
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Fact-checking what Donald Trump got wrong in his ABC News interview

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/jan/26/fact-checking-what-donald-trump-got-wrong-his-abc-/

    On Jan. 25, 2017, ABC News “World News Tonight” anchor David Muir interviewed President Donald Trump in the White House.

    President Donald Trump, in his first major TV interview since taking office, promised that Mexico will pay for the border wall and defended his potential reinstatement of CIA black sites.

    Sitting down with ABC anchor David Muir at the White House, Trump also doubled down on debunked falsehoods about voter fraud, his inauguration crowd size, torture, international policy, health care and former rival Hillary Clinton. (He also boasted, by the way, that his speech in front of the CIA memorial wall included “the biggest standing ovation since Peyton Manning had won the Super Bowl.”)

    Here’s a rundown of the most misleading claims Trump made, fact-checked and with context.

    “You have people that are registered who are dead, who are illegals, who are in two states. You have people registered in two states. They’re registered in a New York and a New Jersey. They vote twice. There are millions of votes, in my opinion.”

    Trump repeatedly warned of widespread voter fraud and illegal votes during and after the election, and has received several Pants on Fire and False ratings.

    Several credible analyses of voter fraud have all concluded that it’s rare and nowhere near in the “millions.” Put another way: More people are struck by lightning or attacked by sharks than are accused of voter fraud.

    News21, a national investigative reporting project, found 150 cases of double voting, 56 cases of non-citizens voting and 10 cases of voter impersonation from 2000 and 2011. Many of these allegations never led to charges, while others were acquitted or dismissed

    Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School and an expert on voter fraud, found an even smaller number: 31 credible incidents out of more than 1 billion votes cast from 2000 to 2014.

    (Trump’s chief strategist Steve Bannon was registered in two states, Florida and New York, until he was removed from voter rolls in Florida on Jan. 25, 2017. The Washington Post reports that Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and advisor, and White House press secretary Sean Spicer are also registered in two states.)

    Muir: “What you have presented so far has been debunked. It’s been called false.”

    Trump: “No, it hasn’t. Take a look at the Pew reports.”

    Trump’s press secretary, Sean Spicer, also evoked “the Pew reports” in a Jan. 24 press briefing, when he claimed a 2008 study from the research center showed that 14 percent of people who voted were noncitizens. That’s False.

    Spicer mixed up two studies and misquoted both of them. A 2012 Pew report about outdated voter rolls and a 2014 Old Dominion University study, which was heavily criticized for its methodology, found 6 percent of noncitizens surveyed voted in 2008.

    If 14 percent of all voters in 2008 were noncitizens, that would have to mean that more than 80 percent of America’s noncitizen population voted.

    When Muir told Trump he had spoken with the Pew study author who confirmed he did not find instances of voter fraud, Trump questioned why he wrote the report and said the author was now “groveling.”

    “I didn’t say there are millions (of illegal votes). But I think there could very well be millions of people. That’s right.”

    But Trump said exactly that, as Muir pointed out, in a tweet after winning the election.

    This specific Twitter claim rated Pants on Fire!

    “In terms of a total audience including television and everything else that you have we had supposedly the biggest crowd in history.”

    It’s difficult to gauge crowd size and estimates are inconsistent, but based on the imperfect numbers available, Trump did not draw the “biggest crowd ever.” We rated a similar claim from Spicer Pants on Fire.

    Media reports have estimated an in-person crowd size of 250,000 to 600,000 for Trump. Spicer indicated 700,000 and Trump himself touted 1.5 million. None of those would have beat former President Barack Obama’s 2009 inauguration crowd of 1.8 million.

    As for television audience, Trump drew 30.6 million viewers across 12 networks, while 37.8 million watched Obama’s 2009 inaugural and 41.8 million tuned into Reagan’s 1981 ceremony.

    Spicer, in a press briefing, pointed to CNN’s streaming numbers for Trump’s inaugural (16.9 million) but provided no other figures. CNN provided nearly 27 million streams for Obama’s inauguration.

    “…you have a 17 percent approval rating, which is pretty bad.”

    Trump accused Muir of demeaning his crowd, which Muir didn’t do, and positing that it had to do with waning public trust in media.

    A 2016 Gallup poll found that 14 percent of Republicans have trust in the media. The press fares better with the public at large and Democrats, 32 percent and 51 percent of whom, respectively, trust the media. That is a historic low.

    “Do I think it (waterboarding) works? Absolutely.”

    Trump has promised to bring back waterboarding, an enhanced interrogation technique that simulates drowning and is considered by many to be torture. In 2015, Obama signed a law making the practice illegal.

    But waterboarding has long been considered a poor way to extract information, according to experts. There are very few historical accounts of success, and even those are suspect. Meanwhile, there’s scientific proof that a technique like waterboarding can affect brain function enough to make a prisoner’s statements unreliable. They may say anything to make the waterboarding stop, and they could be physically unable to provide any cogent intelligence.

    The claim that waterboarding is effective rates False.

    “We’ve had years and years of allowing our jobs to be dissipated in this country, and there’s no reason for it.”

    Trump is referring to the effects of free-trade agreements. America has lost over 700,000 jobs to Mexico and about 2 million manufacturing jobs due to a rising trade deficit with China, according to research by Robert Scott, director of trade and manufacturing policy research at the labor-backed Economic Policy Institute.

    However, trade was far from the only reason for job losses in the manufacturing sector, an industry Trump has vowed to revive. In an op-ed, Scott listed several other factors that have hurt American workers, including the policies of the Federal Reserve, a stagnant minimum wage and a lack of public investment in infrastructure.

    “We’re going to have extreme vetting. It’s going to be very hard to come in. Right now, it’s very easy to come in.”

    Trump is referring to the process of allowing refugees into the United States. He hasn’t specified what “extreme vetting” will look like.

    While there are concerns about information gaps, it’s not necessarily “easy” to come in as a refugee. It involves multiple federal intelligence and security agencies as well as the United Nations. Refugee vetting typically takes one to two years and includes numerous rounds of security checks.

    Ultimately, about half are approved, according to the State Department, and there’s no precedent of a terrorist slipping in through the refugee vetting system in the United States.

    Trump also mentioned the case of the Dec. 2, 2015 shooting in San Bernardino, carried out by a husband and wife pair, that killed 14 people. The husband was born and raised in the United States, while the wife was born in Pakistan and got into America on a K-1 visa, which allows someone to enter the country in order to marry a United States citizen.

    Muir: “You’ve heard the critics who say that would break all international law, taking the oil (from ISIS in Iraq).”

    Trump: “Can you believe that? Wait a minute. Can you believe that? Who are the critics that say that? Fools. I don’t call them critics. I call them fools.”

    Trump’s view about “taking the oil” seems to be in the minority. Many experts in international law have said Trump’s idea of taking oil away from ISIS — and the nation of Iraq, by extension — would break international law.

    “Insofar as Mr. Trump’s proposals are coherent enough to be subject to analysis and judgment, they appear to be practically impossible, legally prohibited, and politically imbecilic,” said Barnett Rubin, associate director of New York University’s Center on International Cooperation, in a past interview with PolitiFact.

    Experts cited the Annex to the Hague Convention of 1907 on the Laws and Customs of War, the 1949 Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Times of War, and a 1974 United Nations resolution. These laws prohibit confiscating or destroying property belonging to individuals or the state except when absolutely necessary.

    “You had millions of people that liked their health insurance and their health care and their doctor and where they went. You had millions of people that now aren’t insured anymore (because of the Affordable Care Act).”

    This isn’t true. The Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, has had the effect of a net increase in the number of people who are insured. Roughly 20 million people now have insurance who didn’t before the 2010 law, and the uninsured rate is the lowest it’s ever been.

    There’s no solid data about how many people became uninsured because of the health care law. When the law went into full effect in 2013, the Associated Press found that about 4.7 million people received insurance policy cancellation notices. But most of these policy holders later received waivers to keep their plans, and others may have switched to a new plan.

    in reply to: West Wing leaker: Trump "irrational", staff "demoralized" #64418
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The leaks coming out of the Trump White House cast the president as a clueless child

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/26/the-leaks-coming-out-the-trump-white-house-cast-the-boss-as-a-clueless-child/?utm_term=.51bf6a47db2d

    All White Houses leak. Sometimes the leaks are big, sometimes small. But there are always people willing to talk to reporters about the “real” story or about why the chief executive made a mistake in regards to some decision he made.

    That said, I’ve never seen so much leaking so quickly — and with such disdain for the president — as I have in the first six days of Donald Trump’s presidency.

    Two recent examples:

    1. This from the New York Times today on Trump’s impulsiveness:

    Mr. Trump’s advisers say that his frenzied if admittedly impulsive approach appeals to voters because it shows that he is a man of action. Those complaining about his fixation with fictional voter fraud or crowd counts at his inauguration, in their view, are simply seeking ways to undercut his legitimacy.

    Yet some of his own advisers also privately worry about his penchant for picking unnecessary fights and drifting off message. They talk about taking away his telephone or canceling his Twitter account, only to be dismissed by a president intent on keeping his own outlets to the world.

    2. This from WaPo on Trump’s inauguration crowd estimates:

    Trump’s advisers suggested that he could push back in a simple tweet. Thomas J. Barrack Jr., a Trump confidant and the chairman of the Presidential Inaugural Committee, offered to deliver a statement addressing the crowd size.

    But Trump was adamant, aides said. Over the objections of his aides and advisers — who urged him to focus on policy and the broader goals of his presidency — the new president issued a decree: He wanted a fiery public response, and he wanted it to come from his press secretary.

    Time and again, the image of Trump pushed by his “aides” is one of a clueless child — someone who acts on impulse, disregarding the better advice of people who know better. We know he needs to be managed or else he will say and do stupid things, the message seems to be. We’re working on it.

    And what we know about Trump from his presidential campaign is that some of his top staffers — most notably Kellyanne Conway — often communicated to the boss via the media. What that strategy suggests is that Trump is influenced at least as much — and, in truth, likely more — by reading the sniping of his aides on background (meaning without their names attached) in the news than he is by private conversations. That the best way to reach him, change his mind or otherwise bend his ear is through a public airing of grievances.

    Trump has shown that his tendency to obsessively consume media — especially cable television — is unchanged in the six days since he has become president. He appears to be making policy decisions via things he watches or reads. (Remember Trump’s famous/infamous statement that he got his military information and advice “mostly from the shows.”)

    At odds with all of this, however, is the fact that Trump is both deeply proud and hugely image-conscious. Having to read and watch allegedly loyal “aides” casting him as a sort of feckless child constantly in need of guidance wouldn’t seem to be the sort of thing that would sit well with him.

    5-Minute Fix newsletter
    Keeping up with politics is easy now.
    Sign up
    Tim Miller, a former spokesman for Jeb(!) Bush’s presidential campaign and a frequent Trump critic, summed that sentiment up nicely:

    Follow
    Tim Miller ✔ @Timodc
    Trump doesn’t seem like the type who will enjoy his advisors talking about him like he’s a child to the New York Times for long. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/824597792299581440
    7:51 AM – 26 Jan 2017
    52 52 Retweets 117 117 likes
    It doesn’t take much imagination to conjure up an image of an irate Trump surrounded by the various clips of his aides driving the perception that he badly needs to be managed at every moment. If Trump’s entire #brand is centered on being the best/classiest/smartest, these sort of leaks fundamentally undermine that image. And we’re only six days into his presidency!

    The frequency — and nature — of these leaks are yet another reminder that the Trump presidency is nothing like anything that’s come before it. There is no blueprint. We’re through the looking glass.

    But my educated guess is that these leaks must be driving Trump absolutely crazy. And when he gets mad, history suggests he will try to get even. And quickly.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    What You Don’t Know About: Being a Punter

    JOHNNY HEKKER
    PUNTER / LOS ANGELES RAMS

    link: http://www.theplayerstribune.com/johnny-hekker-rams-punting/

    “What do you do for work?”

    I was in the backyard of my house outside of Seattle when my neighbor poked his head over the wooden fence that separates our yards and asked me about my job. It was like something out of Home Improvement — one of those Wilson-type situations.

    “I’m a punter for the Rams.”

    “Oh, so you’re the kicker?”

    “Uhhh, well … not exactly.”

    I get this a lot. People find out what I do for a living — either they ask and I tell them or they see me on TV and recognize me — and they confuse me with the kicker. They’ll say something like, “That’s gotta be a tough job, because you’re either making them or missing them.” Or, if they’re a Rams fan, they’ll say, “Thanks, man. You got us some points last week!”

    Sometimes I correct people. It depends on where I am and what the situation is.

    Most of the time, I just let it slide.

    I knew my neighbor wasn’t a football guy, so I explained to him that the punter is not the kicker — that they’re two different people with two entirely different jobs. He says that now, when he watches games and sees the punt formation, he’ll be like, “Hey, that’s what Johnny does!”

    So he’s learning.

    Being a punter isn’t as glamorous as it sounds. I’m sure you didn’t think it was all that glamorous to begin with, but the truth is, like anything, it has its upsides and downsides. I mean, if I pin the other team down inside the 10-yard line, guys aren’t lining up to high-five me. Nobody in the stands is getting out of their seat to cheer. If anybody gets out of their seat when I’m on the field, it’s probably to grab a hot dog or a beer.

    I’m the bathroom-break song at a concert … but I’m O.K. with that.

    On game day, 95% of being a punter is waiting around. For most of the game, I’m just standing on the sidelines, trying to keep things light and encourage the rest of the guys. Then, when it’s my time to shine, I gotta go execute, because I don’t get that many opportunities.

    But it’s not like I just show up on Sunday like, “Hey, guys. How was your week? I’m here to punt now….”

    There’s much more to it than that.

    True story: I actually wanted to be a quarterback.

    I mean, I was a quarterback … in high school. I had every intention of playing quarterback in college, too. Growing up in Bothell, Washington, I always dreamed of playing in what was then the Pac-10. Oregon State was one of the schools I was considering. I attended the Beavers’ quarterback camp in high school, and talked to the coaches after they watched me throw. They said they would be in touch.

    A few weeks later, I got a call from their special teams coach. I remember thinking, This is kinda weird … why would the special teams coach be calling me?

    In college recruiting, coaches are typically responsible for a specific region. So you could be a wide receiver, but — because you live in a certain area — get recruited by a team’s running backs coach. So I figured the special teams coach was calling me because I was in his region.

    He almost made it sound like one of those halftime gimmicks, like sinking a half-court shot to win free tuition.

    Turns out Oregon State had already made an offer to another quarterback in my class, and they didn’t have enough scholarships to offer another QB.

    So they had another idea.

    “We watched some of your film,” the coach said. My highlight tape was about seven minutes long — six minutes of me slinging the rock, one minute of me punting.

    He had watched the final minute.

    “We think you could come here as a preferred walk-on. We don’t have a punter, and we think we can turn you into a scholarship punter.”

    He almost made it sound like one of those halftime gimmicks, like sinking a half-court shot to win free tuition, or seeing who can throw the most footballs into giant Dr. Pepper cans to win an oversized check.

    “You can come down and compete for the job. Whoever wins it will get a scholarship.”

    I had gotten a couple of offers to play quarterback at smaller schools, but playing in the Pac-10 was a goal of mine. Oregon State had the prepharmacy major I wanted and I really liked the coaches … all I had to do was win the starting punting job.

    Problem was, I didn’t really know how to punt. I knew that if you kicked a spiral, that was good. But after that, I knew about as much about punting as my future neighbor.

    But I decided to take a leap of faith. I agreed to walk on at Oregon State, sacrificing my desire to play quarterback for my dream of playing in the Pac-10. The summer before my freshman year, I went down to a kicking and punting camp in Alabama to essentially learn how to punt.

    I went to train with coach Mike McCabe at his One On One Kicking camp — one of the elite kicking and punting camps in the country. On the first day, I walked onto the field wearing the same clunky hightop cleats I had worn while playing quarterback in high school. So The coaches told me that the first thing I had to do was to get a pair of soccer cleats, something really tight on my foot that would help me get a good feel for the ball and make solid contact, and that wouldn’t result in me wasting any energy. A thicker shoe, I was told, would absorb the energy from my foot instead of transferring it to the football, decreasing my punting power.

    So before I even got on the field they were probably thinking, This guy doesn’t know what he’s doing.

    I was working out with other incoming freshmen — true punters who were recruited to be starters at their respective universities. And once I got on the field and we started punting footballs, the other guys were smashing them. Every time. Bombs away.

    For me it was more like … smash one, shank four.

    I noticed that when the other guys punted, everything was super compact. They’d catch the ball, take a couple of short, choppy steps and then boot the hell out of it.

    But I was all over the place.

    When I was in high school, most teams didn’t focus on blocking punts, so I would have all day back there to get the kick off. I would catch the snap, fiddle with the ball a bit and then take three or four steps before launching it. But in college you’re playing against all the fastest guys from high school, and they’re coming hard for the block just about every time.

    Plus, I’m six-foot-five, all legs. So I was taking long, sweeping strides.

    That’s when I first learned about operation time, or get-off time, which is the time from the moment the ball is snapped to the moment it comes off your foot. Optimal get-off time is somewhere around 1.9 seconds, which seemed lightning fast to me.

    So once the coaches identified the things I needed to work on — which was pretty much everything — I stopped punting footballs and started working on the individual steps of the punting process. Because the art of punting has little to do with actually kicking the ball, and everything to do with what happens before.

    First, we worked on catching the snap. When I caught the ball, I was bringing it into my body, like a receiver trying to secure a pass. But bringing it into my body meant that I had to bring it back out in order to drop it and punt, which was wasted motion — which was wasted time.

    The coaches made me catch 100 snaps before they let me move on to anything else, and I had to get it right every time — away from my body, laces up, repeat.

    Next we worked on my steps.

    Like I said, I’m six-foot-five, all legs. If you’ve ever seen me run, you know why people tell me I have the gait of a giraffe. So my long strides were robbing me of power. How to keep my long legs in tight for short, choppy steps — almost like winding up to coil your energy before driving it up into the football — was probably the most difficult thing for me to learn.

    And I use the word coil because when we finally worked on punting an actual football, I learned that I had been approaching things all wrong. I thought that forward momentum was how you generated kicking power. But a punter’s power actually comes from his plant foot — from the ground up. So when you drop the ball, instead of swinging your leg forward and driving the ball out in front of you like a field goal kicker, you have to drive vertically off your plant foot — kind of like a high jumper — and explode up through the football.

    But I definitely had to get worse before I got better. There was a lot of repetition, and a lot of shanked punts. But because of the great coaching I received at One on One Kicking, I went to Oregon State and won the starting punting job — and a scholarship — as a true freshman.

    Crazy story: There were actually two walk-on freshman punters at Oregon State that year — me, and Ryan Allen — and we had both been at Coach McCabe’s camp in Alabama the summer before. Ryan redshirted his freshman year and was my backup in 2009. The next season, since I had the only scholarship for a punter, Ryan transferred to Louisiana Tech, where he went on to win back-to-back Ray Guy awards (as the nation’s best punter). Today, he plays for the Patriots and has a Super Bowl ring.

    So two knuckleheads who walked on at Oregon State at the same time both made their way to the NFL. Pretty cool.

    And Coach McCabe has done so much for us — teaching me how to punt and taking Ryan from a good punter to the best in the nation — that we still train with him today.

    So now that I’ve given you the same Punting 101 course that I got, let’s talk about some of the finer points of the craft.

    If you’re thinking, Wait, we’re still talking about punting? I don’t blame you. But I promise I’ll try to make it as exciting as humanly possible.

    So I’ll start by talking about Devin Hester.

    That guy terrified me — and probably every other punter in the league. The first time I punted to him was in the third game of my rookie season. I had obviously seen his highlights, so in my mind, punting to him could result in three possible outcomes:

    A punt that goes out of bounds
    A fair catch
    A return that brought the ball back halfway — or maybe all the way

    With a guy like Devin, you really have to be on point with your directional punting. I mean, you can’t just punt the ball down the middle of the field and let him choose where he wants to go. You have to use the sideline as a defender, pin him into a corner and give your coverage team a chance to bottle him up.

    Sounds simple — but what makes directional punting so difficult is that when you punt the ball, you want it to spiral so it cuts through the air, increasing distance and hang time. But a spiraling ball doesn’t fly off your foot straight. If you’re rightfooted, a spiraling ball is going to naturally fade to the right because of the way the ball spins.

    So you’re never facing the direction in which you’d like the ball to go. You just gotta know how much your ball fades, account for the wind and adjust accordingly. That’s what makes directional punting so difficult. Kicking it out of bounds is equally tricky because of the way the ball fades in the air off your foot, but also because the referees don’t mark the ball out of bounds where it lands, but instead where it crosses the plane of the sideline in the air. So unless the conditions are perfect and you’re really striking the ball well, it’s usually a last resort.

    Forcing a fair catch is actually your best option — and there’s actually a recipe for that.

    Let’s say you want to hit a 45-yard punt. For the ball and your punt coverage team to meet at the returner, forcing him to signal for a fair catch, you need 4.5 seconds of hang time. For a 50-yard punt, you need 5.0 seconds of hang time. See where this is going?

    The amount of hang time relative to the distance of the punt gives the coverage team enough time to get downfield, forcing the returner to make a fair catch instead of giving him space to return it.

    When you start getting up into punts of more than 50 yards, the hang time gets harder to nail consistently — just like when a field goal kicker’s success-rate drops when he gets beyond 50 yards. How far you want to punt the ball just depends on where your team is positioned on the field.

    So I guess the moral of the story is: Punters are people, too. It’s kind of a thankless job, and it does tick me off a little when somebody says, “Oh, you’re a punter. You’re not a real football player.” I mean, I think I speak for all punters and kickers when I say that we have a ton of respect for the guys who are out there the whole game banging, getting tackled and doing all the dirty work. That’s just not what we’re asked to do.

    We practice all week just like the rest of the team. We watch film all week, too, studying the tendencies of opposing special teams units, focusing on their punt-blocking tendencies and protection packages and seeing where we might be able to exploit them with fakes. We’re in the weight room and out on the practice field working on our timing and situational punting — all the same stuff the other units work on.

    There’s also a different level of pressure to what we do.

    When my team is backed up in its own end zone late in the fourth quarter with a two-point lead, and I need to back the opposing team up out of field goal range so they can’t just kick an easy game-winner — and if I don’t do my job, my team loses — that’s pressure. And that’s one of the things I love about my job.

    There are definitely times when I miss playing quarterback. I mean, there’s nothing like the thrill of hitting a guy in a tight window and watching him taking it to the house, or being in the huddle during a long touchdown drive.

    I’m just lucky that I’ve had coaches who have let me sling the rock from time to time.

    Remember: I’m six-foot-five, all legs, with the gait of a giraffe. So you won’t catch me running up the middle on a fake punt anytime soon. But it’s definitely a throwback to my high school glory days when my number gets called on a fake — a little nerve-racking, but still pretty cool.

    Being a punter is definitely not as glamorous as playing quarterback, but hey, this is the life I chose when I walked on at Oregon State. I took a chance, and I wouldn’t take it back for the world.

    I may be on the sidelines for 95% of the game, but at least I have the best seat in the house.

    in reply to: "I asked my student why he voted for Trump" #64401
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    And part of moving on is not repeating the mistake.

    Except…we’re not saying anything now that we weren’t already saying in the 2008 primaries.

    The only real difference between now and then, when it comes to discussing the dems anyway, is that no one anticipated how well Sanders would do.

    The rest? We could have made a board banner listing the complaints with the dems in 2008 and would never have had to change it to this day.

    Meanwhile to me the real story right now is not Clinton v. Trump, it’s Trump plus a republican congress. So while we bar the doors against dracula and hang garlic and crosses all over the place, turns out there’s also a werewolf clawing at the door too. And the whole time the witch is still dead.

    ..

    in reply to: Trump: right on the TPP #64400
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Trump was always going to be worse domestically and Clinton was always going to be worse on foreign policy and international trade (thus, internationally).

    Disagree Mack.

    As long as we keep framing it in terms of Clinton, when it comes to that, Trump is already (as predicted) FAR FAR worse domestically…not just worse. Worse by several degrees of magnitude. And to me he will be no better in terms of foreign policy, though he will be somewhat different–but just as bad in his own way if not (and this is far more likely) EVEN worse.

    In terms of how bad Trump is, we have not even barely scratched the surface yet. Even the most pessimistic amongst us has no idea how bad it is going to get (cause for one thing it’s not just Trump. That’s only part of it.)

    And the TPP was dead anyway. To me that one is just a non-issue.

    in reply to: Seymour Hersh on the hacking story #64399
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    He is saying exactly what i have been saying. Doesn’t mean I’m right or he’s right, but Hersh is usually given a lot of weight on this board.

    w
    v

    And, I wasn’t persuaded.

    There’s something in the Russia story. It’s more than just the way it got framed, which is that dems made it up to whine. See I don’t care about that and it’s not the only (let alone the right) way to frame it. Nor was hacking the Dems (and republicans) the only aspect of the story.

    There’s a lot find out still and this will probably be a slow and lingering thing.

    in reply to: "I asked my student why he voted for Trump" #64390
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cuz I keep reading variations of the same things and then keep reading about each time, how people are struck with these new insights.

    Yeah…maybe it’s me. I dunno.

    I liked the article, myself.

    It’s especially good, I think, on how deflecting the issue of race is done in such a way that it appears to occupy higher ground while, in the end, being the same white nationalist stuff in essence.

    Interesting movie review (…of a movie I will never see because it’s graphic horror):

    http://www.aintitcool.com/node/77120

    Plot: A young black man visits his white girlfriend’s diverse family estate only to learn that many of its black residents have gone missing, and the horrible truth when another frantic African-American warns him to “get out”. It becomes clear that this is easier said than done.

    The surprise midnight screening at the Sundance Film Festival this year wasn’t much of a surprise by the time it began rolling, but I think it shocked more that a few attendees at just how strong, topical and occasionally shocking it was. First-time writer-director Jordan Peele (half of the great comedy team Key & Peele, who made KEANU last year) has been talking for a couple of years about his horror-comedy script GET OUT. But when the details of the plot begin to reveal themselves, I’m not quite sure anyone will be prepared for how he dives headfirst into the deep waters of racism in America, told through a story that makes it quite clear that, while racism might seem more at bay than ever before (I’m talking about the pre-President Trump era in which the film was conceived and made), the real fear amongst African-Americans is the white people are just better at hiding it.

    GET OUT begins harmlessly enough. A young, interracial couple—Chris (Daniel Kaluuya of SICARIO) and Rose (Allison Williams from “Girls”)—decide to head to her parents’ palatial estate (I don’t recall if the film ever names the state in which the action takes place, but it was shot in Alabama), where Chris can finally meet the folks for the first time. He’s worried, as any new boyfriend would be, about what they’ll think of him, in particular, the fact that he’s black (apparently he’s Rose’s first black boyfriend). But parents Dean (Bradley Whitford) and Missy (Catherine Keener) seem positively darling, almost trying too hard to make Chris feel at home. (“I would have voted for Obama for a third time,” says Dean.)

    It doesn’t take long for Chris to feel like something is amiss, especially when he meets the household staff, Walter (Marcus Henderson) and Georgina (Betty Gabriel), who seem more Stepford than Southern. They are overly smiley and surface-level nice, while seeming suspicious and not eager to engage in chit-chat with Chris. Peele is a smart enough filmmaker to drop subtle hints about what’s really going on in the house and community; even still he never gives away too much.

    At the top of the film, we see a young black musician (played by Keith Stanfield of STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON, “Atlanta,” SHORT TERM 12, SNOWDEN) lost on the streets of this same affluent neighborhood; he’s plucked off the road by a passing car, and when we see him again, at an annual party thrown by Rose’s parents, he’s the date of a middle-aged woman, dressed like a codger at a pricey nursing home. But something unintentional happens that seems to snap him out of his condition, and he immediately begins to scream at Chris to run before he’s whisked away by others at the party and taken into a room with Missy, who just happens to by a psychiatrist who specializes in hypnotherapy. She even conducts a seemingly harmless experiment on Christ that results in him quitting smoking.

    It seems unlikely that Jordan Peele would ever make something that didn’t have a great deal of subtext, and GET OUT is loaded with it—much of it not even sub-. The way the guests (all white) greet and speak to Chris is polite to the point of overreaching, attempting to appear friendly and even flirty, staring at him out of the corners of their eyes like a prize farm animal. More than being awkward for Chris, a gradual sense of being demeaned creeps in, especially from Rose’s troubled brother (Caleb Landry Jones), a character the film could have easily lived without, mostly because Jones overplays the part to such a degree that it breaks the mood of the perfectly toned movie.

    One very necessary supporting character is that of Chris’s best friend, a TSA agent (LilRel Howery) who fancies himself an amateur detective. And when Chris and Rose don’t return home when scheduled, Howery begins the process of finding them using local authorities or his own intuition (he’s thinking the white people kidnapped Chris to turn him into a sex slave). I don’t want to say too much more about the plot, but the entire third act is certifiably nuts and occasionally grotesque. Every actor meant to be duplicitous here does a terrific job finding both good and awful qualities in their characters, especially Whitford and Keener. And Kaluuya is tremendous as a man placed in a situation that he could never have conceived of. He’s brave when he has no other choice and terrified when he has a moment to think about how deep and unspeakable certain actions are.

    Peele also finds a few moments to make things genuinely tense and scary. Some of the jumps are cheap and obvious, but for the most part, the filmmaker wants the fear experience to be genuine and heartfelt. Nothing is more critical in a horror film’s success than getting the audience to care about the characters in danger. Then toss in veiled statements about cultural appropriation and how “cool” being black is (this is the old white people saying that, mind you), and you have a thought-provoking and entertaining offering.

    This is a tough film to review without giving certain aspects away, so I’ll leave you with this: GET OUT is so damn smart, funny, and scary impressively directed by Peele, who embraces certain great horror tropes, but never forgetting that the best horror and sci-fi often includes clandestine messages and commentary on modern society. And the idea of using the monster of racism as the true villain here is handled beautifully. The filmmaker brings us into Chris’s life is by giving us a bit of his troubled and painful past regarding his parents, some of which are brought of the dark recess of his memories with a little hypnotic kick from Missy.

    Peele doesn’t spare us a bit of the old gore, but he manages to find a few gross-out tricks in GET OUT that surprised even me. But his main goal seems to be to provide a sustained sense of dread, punctuated by a handful of genuinely terrifying moments. It’s an impressive debut that has me eager to see what Peele has to offer next both within and without of his comedy team.

    in reply to: Bruce closing in on Hall of Fame induction #64389
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is a great article, I think.

    ..

    in reply to: "I asked my student why he voted for Trump" #64382
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Mack, no offense, and speaking just for myself, I don’t care about Clinton. Or the various views of her, from the most extravagantly overdone to the most understated.

    That’s just me being bluntly honest in a tough time.

    And I don’t even think the real issue is Trump. I think it’s Trump and the republicans, who are probably at this point 2 ships sailing in the night, both in the same direction.

    Here we have a very interesting essay about the mindset that (most likely) got Trump elected. Lots to discuss there. And at least 2 responses take issue with the author’s brief and minor remarks about Clinton.

    Others will have different responses I am sure. Mine is that I am not interested.

    I don’t know…in comparison to endlessly debating a candidate who lost (something I have never done before, after any election)…to me, there are real things to worry about.

    Besides. There is not a single sin we can hang on the dems that Trump isn’t going to make look like kid’s stuff in comparison. That to me is very real.

    in reply to: coach hire thread #2 (from 1/23 – ?) #64379
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Aaron Kromer likely joining Rams as offensive line coach

    Alden Gonzalez

    http://www.espn.com/blog/los-angeles-rams/post/_/id/32846/aaron-kromer-likely-joining-rams-as-offensive-line-coach

    LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles Rams are expected to bring Aaron Kromer in as their new offensive line coach, a source confirmed to ESPN on Tuesday. The development, which is not yet official, was first reported by USA Today.

    Kromer would replace Paul Boudreau, who has been an NFL offensive line coach for 30 consecutive years and spent the last five seasons with the Rams. The Rams used seven draft picks on offensive linemen from 2014 to ’15, but have been unable get it right up front. Greg Robinson, the No. 2 overall pick in 2014, has struggled mightily at left tackle, while right tackle Rob Havenstein, a second-round pick in 2015, struggled in his second NFL season.

    Aaron Kromer, who spent the last two seasons with the Buffalo Bills, has been an offensive line coach for 11 seasons, along with two years as the Bears’ offensive coordinator. Fred Kfoury III/Icon Sportswire
    Kromer has spent 11 years as an offensive line coach for four NFL teams, including the Oakland Raiders (2002 to ’04), Tampa Bay Buccaneers (2006 to ’07), New Orleans Saints (2009 to ’12) and Buffalo Bills (2015 to ’16). Kromer also was offensive coordinator for the Chicago Bears from 2013 to ’14 and served as the Saints’ interim coach for the first six games of 2012, when the Saints were penalized in the infamous bounty scandal.

    Kromer, 49, began his stint with the Bills by serving his own six-game suspension for allegedly getting into a physical altercation with a minor. Kromer’s son, Zachery, was accused of placing his hands on another boy during the incident, but both charges were dropped after an amicable resolution.

    In Kromer’s two years as offensive line coach, the Bills led the NFL with 5.06 rushing yards per carry. As offensive coordinator in Chicago, the Bears had the second-highest scoring offense in the NFL in 2013 before falling to 23rd in points by 2014. And during his four-year stint as offensive line coach with the Saints, Kromer coached five players who went to a combined 10 Pro Bowls.

    Behind the Rams’ offensive line in 2016, Todd Gurley averaged only 3.18 rushing yards per carry, the second-worst rate in the NFL, and Jared Goff was sacked 25 times over his last six games. New head coach Sean McVay will call the Rams’ offensive plays this season and has agreed to hire former Jacksonville Jaguars offensive coordinator Greg Olson as his quarterbacks coach. Skip Peete will return as running backs coach, but wide receivers coach Mike Groh recently accepted a job with the Philadelphia Eagles.

    Kromer coached under Jon Gruden, one of McVay’s key mentors, in Oakland and Tampa Bay. The Rams reportedly were considering Kromer for their head coaching position before they settled on Jeff Fisher in 2012.

    Kromer currently is with the Rams’ contingent in Mobile, Alabama, for the Senior Bowl, according to USA Today.

    in reply to: "I asked my student why he voted for Trump" #64373
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The kid in the coveralls bought it hook, line and sinker.

    Plus he thought Reconstruction was bad because the federal government SUCCEEDED at what it was trying to do.

    That’s like saying, hey, we have to get rid of top-notch offensive coaching, because look what it did to the Rams offense last season.

    To state the obvious because it;s fun to state the obvious in response to revisionary history. The federal government lost the battle of reconstruction.

    Plus I like, we didn’t really have to force the end of slavery on them…it probably would have just gone away. Yeah the slaves in the civil war era were probably going “I dunno, just wait. Give em a chance. We’re patient. In the meanwhile, where’s the harm?”

    in reply to: "I asked my student why he voted for Trump" #64372
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    You two need to rent a room.

    Enh. That never works.

    in reply to: Believe it or not it's time. THE SENIOR BOWL THREAD #64358
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    2017 Senior Bowl Wide Receiver Preview

    link: http://insidethepylon.com/nfl/2017-nfl-draft/2017/01/23/2017-senior-bowl-wide-receiver-preview/

    Ryan Switzer, North Carolina, 5-10 185 lbs

    Ryan Switzer is a true senior who played in 53 career games as both a wide receiver and punt returner for 4 years for the North Carolina Tar Heels. He had a career year playing from the slot in 2016, registering 96 receptions, 1,112 yards, and 6 touchdowns. He is small for a wide receiver, but he possesses good athletic ability, which North Carolina took advantage of with screens and flare routes.

    Switzer’s mental processing is probably his biggest asset. When running routes, he has a good ability to read a zone defense and find holes between zones to get himself open. He also does a good job of reading the defensive back covering him in off coverage, using the stem of his route to attack directly at the defender and chew up the cushion the defender has before making a quick jab in one direction to get DBs to turn their hips, or lean, in the wrong direction before quickly breaking in the other direction with space to catch the ball. He employs a similar strategy after the catch, getting behind blockers and working in one direction to get the defender to commit one way before cutting back and giving his teammates a good angle to block with.

    There is no bigger glaring weakness in Switzer’s game than his inconsistent use of hands when catching the football. At North Carolina, they did a good job of running plays that worked him into space as previously noted so he had many uncontested opportunities and got away with catching the ball against his body. When he did use his hands to catch, he still has issues securing the ball and would “double catch” passes where the ball would bounce off his hands before he finally secured it against his body. He ran a pretty limited route tree in college and would round off certain cuts in his routes such as on out routes. He is not the most physical player, at times electing to quickly run out of bounds instead of taking on a defender after the catch.

    Trent Taylor, Louisiana Tech, 5-8 178 lbs

    Trent Taylor is a true senior who played in 53 career games over 4 years for the Louisiana Tech Bulldogs as both a wide receiver and a punt returner. He led the nation in receiving yards with 1,803 and was also second in the nation in receptions with 136. He is a smaller option at wide receiver, but the Bulldogs used him well in the slot and gave him plenty of opportunities to succeed with his good athletic ability and quickness.

    Taylor is a smart receiver who reads a zone defense well and looks to adjust his route to exploit holes in the defense. He utilizes his quickness by getting to those spots in a hurry before the defense can adjust to him and he shows good awareness of his position on the field, and makes sure to go the extra yard if he is close to the first down. Despite his smaller stature, he does a good job of extending his arms and securing passes with his hands outside of his frame, giving the quarterback a bigger target to throw to. He is a physical football player, as well. He can use his quickness and athletic ability to create YAC, but he is also not afraid to lower his shoulder and grind for extra yards if need be.

    Playing from the slot a majority of the time, he had the luxury of getting to play in space plenty and was able to release cleanly off the line of scrimmage. Though he is aggressive and willing to be a physical player, when facing a defensive back playing press coverage with a jam at the line of scrimmage, he struggled to get a clean release, often taking too long to be a factor in the play. His route running was not as precise at times and instead he would have to revert to using strength at the top of his stem, which he struggled use effectively.

    Taywan Taylor, Western Kentucky, 6-0 195 lbs

    Taywan Taylor is a true senior who played in in 52 career games over 4 seasons for the Western Kentucky Hilltoppers. Playing as an X, Z, and even slot receiver at times, he set the school mark in 2016 for receptions (98) and receiving yards (1,730) while also tying the record (also set by him in his junior season) for touchdown receptions (17). He has good size for a wide receiver and is a good athlete overall, displaying good quickness and very good ability to change direction.

    Taylor’s athleticism is a big strength in his game, as he uses it to create separation to get himself open often. He likes to set up the DB on his slant and post routes by making a quick jab in one direction to get the DB to begin to turn his hips, or at the very least hesitate and lean that way, before quickly cutting in the other direction. His ability to change directions so quickly makes him dangerous when running a double breaking route as he does get the DB to fully commit to his first move before breaking in another direction. He does a good job tracking the ball on deeper routes, as well. Though he benefited being open due to blown coverage, he does a good job of tracking the ball and adjusting to it in the air.

    Although he is listed at 195 pounds, Taylor’s play strength and just overall physical toughness is a weakness. He struggled to fight through jams at the line of scrimmage quickly enough to be a real threat in a play. On contested catches, he allowed himself to be boxed out too easily by DBs and would have to try to out jump them to go over them to make the catch, which he did not do successfully very often. After the catch, he could use his speed well to create YAC, but if he wasn’t able to work in space, he was quick to take the ball out of bounds instead of trying to fight through tackles to gain extra yards. Though he is quick and explosive through certain cuts like on his slant route, a majority of the time he lacked that attention to detail and rounded off cuts for other routes. He played against off coverage a lot so he was still open plenty, but in a league where coverage is much tighter, he will need to be more precise with his routes.

    Amara Darboh, Michigan, 6-2 215 lbs

    Amara Darboh is a redshirt senior who has played in 48 games, starting 28 of them for the Michigan Wolverines. This last season he played in all 12 games, starting 11 and amassed 57 catches, for 862 yards and 7 touchdowns. Born in Sierra Leone, Darboh’s parents were killed in the Sierra Leone Civil War and he moved to Iowa when he was 7 years old.

    Darboh has the ideal size for an NFL wide receiver and can be effective as both an outside receiver or in the slot. During his time at Michigan, Darboh ran a lot of slant routes, crossing routes and curl routes and can find holes in zone coverage, particularly when the play breaks down into a scramble drill and the quarterback is forced on the move. He is very strong when it comes to contested catches, not only due to his size but also his great athleticism for someone his size, as well as his sure hands. He also has the ability to track the ball well in the air even when a defensive back is draped all over him, showing good concentration.

    While he ran a decent amount of routes throughout his college career, a lot of the time he doesn’t look fluid in his route running, and at times doesn’t sell a route well, particularly curl routes. He played against a lot of off coverage so was able to get open, especially on screen passes, but may struggle a little against the tighter coverage in the NFL and will need to make better use of his body to shield off defenders on those curl routes. He’s also an inconsistent run blocker and was easily knocked off his feet at times.

    Zay Jones, East Carolina, 6-1 197 lbs

    Zay Jones is a senior who spent 4 years amassing huge numbers for the Pirates, hauling in 399 catches for 4,279 yards and 23 touchdowns in 50 games played. Jones is the son of former Dallas Cowboys linebacker Robert Jones, who won 3 Super Bowls and was NFC rookie of the year in 1992.

    Although Jones is listed as 6’1’’ he looks taller on film. His biggest strength is his hands, which he uses extremely well. He has long arms so is able to extend his hands towards the ball and catch cleanly rather than letting it come into his chest. Jones shows good footwork and his route running is solid. The WR can ‘’stop and go’’ very well on vertical routes and ran a diverse route tree at East Carolina including slants, posts, curl and corner routes. He is also versatile having played his first 3 years in the slot and his senior year as an outside receiver. Solid run blocker and wasn’t afraid to get physical and open up running lanes on the outside.

    Jones does have a slight frame and could do with bulking up just a little, otherwise he could struggle against tight, physical man coverage in the NFL especially if he’s lined up outside. Although he can find space, he sometimes doesn’t make good use of it with the ball in his hands, and so needs to improve his decision making as to where he takes the ball when he has it in his hands. Was a little inconsistent in following his blockers out in front of him particularly on screen passes.

    Amba Etta-Tawo, Syracuse, 6-2 202 lbs

    Amba Etta-Tawo was born in Oman but grew up in Georgia. He is a senior who transferred from Maryland to Syracuse for his senior season. Statistically he had a strong season with 94 catches for 1,482 yards and 14 touchdowns in 12 games. He certainly benefited from the Syracuse passing game which has now put him well within reach of the NFL.

    Etta-Tawo has very good size and measurables as well as the ability to fight for contested catches. He also breaks tackles extremely well and fights through arms tackles with ease. The WR is effective in open space with the ball in his hands and works the sideline well on deep vertical routes, which he ran a lot of last season. He played against man coverage and won some of these matchups to come up with big plays. Etta-Tawo follows blockers well on screen passes and when he gets free down the sideline or across the middle of the field he showcases very good speed to get away from would-be tacklers.

    He didn’t run much of a route tree in his college career and is inconsistent with his hands and at times dropped easy deep balls. The WR needs to improve his route running which at times appeared to be poor. For a guy his size he isn’t as consistent at the contested catch as he should be and this seemed to be down to lack of concentration at times, while having a propensity to wait for the ball to come to him rather than work towards the quarterback on short to intermediate routes. His timing on routes where he has to turn towards the quarterback also needs improving.

    Travin Dural, LSU, 6-2 203 lbs

    Travin Dural is a senior who spent 4 seasons at LSU but only played in 3 due to a season-ending knee injury in his freshman year. Statistically he doesn’t jump out after compiling 72 catches for 1,436 yards and 12 touchdowns in 3 years, but it’s key to remember he played in a run first offense and opportunities to see a lot of targets were at a minimum. But there is more to his game than you might think.

    First, Dural has great speed for someone his size. Has the look of an NFL receiver and in particular his straight line is speed allows him to get down the field and behind defenders quickly. Has good athleticism for his size and he shows good acceleration out of his stance and will use speed and agility to get away from jams at the line of scrimmage to good effect at times. Dural is a good run blocker on the outside, showing good strength and technique.

    Although Dural has good hands, he doesn’t show this when thrown to across the middle of the field and can easily lose concentration if he sees a big hit coming. Didn’t run a variety of routes during his college career, running mostly deep routes to make use of his speed. Bigger, more physical DB’s will give him trouble when playing press coverage as he has poor hand usage when jammed at the line of scrimmage. Some scouts may find it hard to get past his lack of production so will need a strong senior bowl showing.

    Josh Reynolds Texas A&M, 6-3 193 lbs

    Reynolds played in 38 games during his career at Texas A&M. He performed well for the Aggies in 2016 while playing on the outside having career highs in receptions and yards with 62 and 1,039 respectively. Reynolds also caught 12 touchdown passes making him a serious scoring threat for whoever lined up against him.

    Reynolds displays good athletic ability using his speed and quickness to eat up cushion given by DBs playing off coverage on him. Against press coverage, Reynolds beats the jam using his hands to swat away defenders at the line of scrimmage to get into his route. It will be interesting to see how he develops this skill as he transitions to the NFL. Like most players entering the NFL he may want to add more weight to develop his strength. Reynolds has good mental processing abilities by settling in voids that zone defenses give him. He does a good job of getting inside positioning on the slant route to create separation between himself and the defensive back. Also has good hands to catch the ball within the strike zone and has a good catch radius to extend beyond his frame to catch some poorly placed passes. Reynolds has the ability to be a deep threat as he displays good ball tracking skills. With his height and competitive toughness, Reynolds should also be a red zone threat as quarterbacks will like throwing the fade to this target. Showing solid play strength with his knack for working back to the ball and extending his arms to pluck the ball on contested catches against corners, Reynolds has solid YAC ability as he can break waist tackles to gain yards after the catch.

    Reynolds will have a focus drop here and there due to him wanting to make a play before he secures the ball in his hands. Like most wide receivers coming out of college he’ll need to work on his blocking abilities and deepen his route tree.

    Fred Ross, Mississippi State, 6-2 207 lbs

    Ross played in 42 games for the Mississippi State Bulldogs amassing 200 career catches and 2,545 yards, mainly during his Junior and Senior seasons. Ross’s catches and yards took a dip in 2016 compared to his 2015 season, but that could be attributed to Mississippi State losing Dak Prescott to the NFL. Although, sophomore Nick Fitzgerald did find Ross in the end zone for a career high of 12 touchdowns in 2016.

    Ross is a reliable receiver who is used on the outside and in the slot. The WR eats the press by being physical using his hands to push cornerbacks off him to get into his route. Has good mental processing as he can diagnose a defense and sit in voids of the zone. Ross creates separation with his quickness at the top of his route as well as using the cornerbacks cushion against him. He does a good job of getting inside positioning on defenders and displays good hands with the ability to go over the middle and make tough catches with multiple defenders surrounding him try to free the ball loose. Ross has a good catch radius and can adjust to the passes thrown outside his frame while being quarterback friendly by working back to the football. He has very good competitive toughness displayed by his ability to hustle down field to throw the additional block on a run play. Once the ball is in his hands Ross will use his elusiveness to gain YAC, but can also break low tackles.

    Something Ross could work on would be that he did run an array of routes while at Mississippi State. While he’s a willing blocker it’s something that has to be refined while transitioning to the NFL. I believe Ross could be a good number two receiver in the NFL if a coaching staff is able to develop and help refine his overall game.

    Jamari Staples, Louisville, 6-3 195 lbs

    Staples played two seasons at Alabama Birmingham before transferring to Louisville in 2015. He didn’t put up much production in his four year career catching only 113 passes for 1901 yards and 10 touchdowns in 38 games. He played both on the outside and in the slot for Louisville.

    Staples has the ability to extend beyond his frame to reel in errant passes due to his long arms. He also displayed toughness while at Louisville by holding onto the ball while being hit from behind from defenders. Louisville used Staples as a blocker in the screen game where he was to create a path for his blocker to run.

    Without much production and film on Staples publicly it is difficult to come up with a true evaluation of his game. I’m hoping scouts are able to get a clearer picture of the receiver down in Mobile, Alabama this up and coming week.

    Cooper Kupp, Eastern Washington, 6-2 215 lbs

    Kupp has played in 52 career games for the Eastern Washington Eagles. The Senior has NFL bloodlines with his father, Craig Kupp, and grandfather, Jake Kupp, both playing in the NFL. Kupp certainly impressed with his production despite coming from a FCS school as the Eastern Washington product holds the Division 1 record in receptions, yards, and touchdowns. He put up more impressive statistics in 2016 with 117 receptions, 1,700 yards, and 17 touchdowns in 13 games.

    Kupp is a big slot receiver who has good athletic ability. He made a lot of catches where he had to adjust to a ball thrown behind him. Kupp has good mental processing ability as a lot of his catches come on settling in voids of the zone. He has good hands and is a reliable receiver who will come down with contested catches at the point of attack. The WR has very good competitive toughness as he’s not afraid to make a catch over the middle. He also suffered a left shoulder injury during the FCS playoffs, but played through it anyway. Kupp has good speed and quickness to outrun defensive backs to get YAC. Kupp also has good play strength and plays with a physicalness to his game, displaying the ability to break tackles for yards after the catch.

    There are a few questions with Kupp, however. He did not face press coverage much as he mainly lined up in the slot. Also, many will question whether Kupp can play at the NFL level because he comes from a small school. I think the Senior Bowl will help answer a lot of questions surrounding Kupp’s ability to play against higher levels of competition.

    Artavis Scott, Clemson, 5-10 190 lbs

    Scott is a Junior, but is Senior Bowl eligible because he graduated early. He’s played in 42 games and has made an impact in every season he’s played thus far. He’s caught at least 76 passes in each of his first three seasons and accumulated 2,480 receiving yards and 19 touchdowns.

    Clemson used Scott in a plethora of ways. He returned punts and kicks for the team at various points in his career and was also used as an outside and a slot receiver. Although, I think at his size he’s best used as a slot receiver going forward. He is good at working the underneath areas of the field using his good quickness and settling in voids of the zone. Clemson used him in the screen game as he has the ability to read his blockers allowing him to burst through the right path. A high effort player who is a willing blocker in the run game, Scott is also an unselfish player as he’s been able to learn the subtle art of (link to Ted’s Pick Play piece) being the man who sets the “pick” on pick / rub plays. Clemson has also motioned Scott into the backfield as a running back on outside plays made for him to get to the edge.

    Scott’s size limits his ability to go against larger cornerbacks on the outside as he doesn’t possess the play strength to win 1 on 1 battles for contested catches.

    in reply to: Zizek on Trump #64356
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Yes. That’s what Liberal Marxist Communists do.

    In times of crisis, they say “by Lenin.”

    By Zizek, yes, I swear, it’s true.

    .

    in reply to: "I asked my student why he voted for Trump" #64352
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    it most often describes the return of an undesirable condition, such as a war or a plague, or the return of an undesirable idea.

    Well, okay. Like throwing for 4 on 3rd and 5.

    .

    in reply to: hiring head coaches #64351
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Ranking NFL coaching hires: Anthony Lynn at No. 1

    Gregg Rosenthal

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000778807/article/ranking-nfl-coaching-hires-anthony-lynn-at-no-1

    Choosing a great NFL head coach is like handicapping a horse race. The Rooney family is great at it, but it’s a crapshoot for everyone else.

    This round of NFL hirings officially will be completed after Super Bowl LI, when the 49ers are expected to hire Falcons offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan to fill their vacancy. Shanahan will be the fifth first-time head coach in this cycle’s six hirings and the third with an offensive background. Jacksonville’s Doug Marrone is the only former head coach of this crop, and the only one who didn’t spend 2016 as a coordinator.

    NFL owners struggling to identify the best coaches won’t stop me from trying to do the same. Here’s how I’d rank the six new hires based on their likelihood for success in their respective tenures.

    1) Anthony Lynn, Los Angeles Chargers: This ranking is not just about Lynn, but the staff that he quickly built. Lynn chose to keep offensive coordinator Ken Whisenhunt, reportedly at the prodding of Chargers management. Lynn also convinced former Seahawks defensive coordinator and Jaguars head coach Gus Bradley to run his defense.

    Lynn’s inexperience running a team — he’s never been a head coach at any level, though he did serve as the interim head coach in Buffalo after Rex Ryan’s firing heading into Week 17 — will be mitigated by the presence of two former head coaches (Whisenhunt and Bradley) on his staff. Those hires show a self-confidence and lack of ego that will serve him well.

    Lynn won the job in large part because he was a “natural-born leader,” according to Chargers president John Spanos. It’s easy to see why players swear by him after listening to Lynn address the media. He stressed wanting to coach the entire Chargers roster rather than focusing on his specialty, the running game. While he’s worked in Ryan’s shadow (having served on Ryan’s staff with the Jets from 2009 to 2014 and again with the Bills in 2015 and ’16), Lynn sounded like a man who has prepared to run a team since he got into coaching. He carries himself like someone who will be doing this a long time.

    Lynn’s proven track record as a creative, productive run-game schemer (his Bills teams had the NFL’s top-ranked rushing attack the past two seasons) puts him over the top as No. 1 for this exercise. If he can meld his ideas with Whisenhunt’s offense, the Chargers could take a playoff trip after moving north up the 405.

    2) Sean McVay, Los Angeles Rams: No one knows if McVay can transform quarterback Jared Goff into a star. Everyone knows Wade Phillips is one of the greatest defensive coordinators of all time. The hiring of a known quantity like Phillips boosts McVay up these rankings, which are inherently stuffed with uncertainty. Worrying about whether defensive tackle Aaron Donald and linebacker Alec Ogletree fit Phillips’ system misses the big picture. Give Phillips talented players, and he’ll figure out how to make them shine.

    McVay, 30, is a far bigger question mark. He’s the rare offensive ingenue who is prized for his acumen and known for communicating well with his players. But how much credit do coach Jay Gruden and Washington’s deep receiver group get for the well-constructed Redskins offense?

    Watching McVay’s introductory press conference, it’s easy to see why he impressed the Rams’ and 49ers’ decision-makers in interviews. He rocketed up wish lists in January because he sounds like a head coach, due to his energy and confidence. Gus Bradley was another hot-shot coordinator who impressed at the podium and behind closed doors, but that doesn’t necessarily translate into running a team.

    3) Vance Joseph, Denver Broncos: John Elway didn’t hire Joseph for his defensive game plans. Joseph was only a defensive coordinator for one season in Miami, and the 2016 Dolphins group didn’t exactly shine. Joseph won the job through his presence and his strong recommendations. Despite mostly being a position coach, he was the right-hand man for Gary Kubiak in Houston, Marvin Lewis in Cincinnati and Adam Gase in Miami. In an interview with KUSA, Elway cited Joseph’s “great vision” and his leadership skills.

    Joseph is set up to succeed in one of the NFL’s strongest organizations, with a top defensive roster and former Chargers head coach Mike McCoy as his offensive coordinator. Promoting secondary coach Joe Woods to defensive coordinator provides continuity on Denver’s stronger side of the ball. This ranking partly reflects Denver’s track record under Elway. His judgement on these large-scale decisions deserves the benefit of the doubt.

    4) Kyle Shanahan, San Francisco 49ers: NFL.com’s Michael Silver reported that Shanahan is “almost certain” to accept the 49ers head coaching job after the Super Bowl, when it’s officially offered to the current Falcons offensive coordinator. He passes one quick test I have for any head coach: Does he bring something tangible to the table? Shanahan’s offense makes that answer an unqualified yes.

    Despite his age, the 37-year-old Shanahan has vast experience as a top play-caller. He’s run offenses for nine NFL seasons, and those teams ranked in the top 10 in yardage six times. He’s successfully modernized some of his father Mike’s West Coast Offense principles for this pass-wacky era. That’s why it was only a matter of time before Shanahan got his own team.

    There are red flags, however. Shanahan’s previous stop in Cleveland ended bumpily, with Shanahan asking to leave after one season under contentious circumstances. He has successfully leveraged his offensive wizardry into a job that is expected to give him great power within a currently broken franchise. (For one, Shanahan is expected to help pick his general manager.) That power and responsibility is a lot to handle, considering San Francisco’s lack of a quarterback and sub-standard roster. Back in Denver, general manager Mike Shanahan essentially got coach Mike Shanahan fired. It doesn’t help that the 49ers have proven impatient and are lacking consistent direction.

    The delay in Shanahan’s hiring will hurt him greatly in terms of putting together a staff. Chip Kelly was sunk in San Francisco partly because he was stuck with a lousy defensive roster and couldn’t find a high-quality coordinator to save it. Shanahan is the captain in gym class stuck with the last pick. Getting quality coaches to San Francisco, where he will be the fourth head coach in as many years, won’t be easy. Nothing about Shanahan’s job will be.

    5) Doug Marrone, Jacksonville Jaguars: Marrone’s strange departure from Buffalo two years ago didn’t reflect well on either side. His track record with the Bills sent similarly mixed signals. While the Bills went 9-7 in Marrone’s second season, that was largely due to defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz’s excellent group. Marrone’s offense was below average in both of his seasons in Buffalo, although his quarterbacks were EJ Manuel and Kyle Orton. Even Marrone’s tactics were inconsistent. His Bills moved away from an extreme run-heavy approach in his second season.

    That’s a long-winded way of saying Marrone’s first stint as a head coach shouldn’t get Jaguars fans excited or scare them away. He’ll have the same offensive coordinator, Nathaniel Hackett, that he had in Buffalo. The Jaguars will have the same defensive coordinator, Todd Wash, as they did in 2016. (That’s likely to the chagrin of cornerback Jalen Ramsey, who said he wanted a “complete change” of the team’s scheme and staff.)

    Promoting Marrone (who was an assistant in Jacksonville the past two seasons) and retaining Wash supports my theory that the Jaguars didn’t want to shake up their current staff. They doubled down on the Blake Bortles era under general manager David Caldwell. Marrone has some talent to work with, but he might not have a long timeline to turn things around before new executive VP Tom Coughlin makes a clean sweep of the organization.

    6) Sean McDermott, Buffalo Bills: It’s unfair to rank McDermott this low, but someone has to bring up the rear. McDermott is well respected throughout the NFL, but he has the fewest tangible assets and perhaps the most difficult job of the new coaches.

    The Bills have high expectations and a flawed roster. The organization also has an entrenched GM in Doug Whaley who hasn’t shown a great aptitude for finding talent. McDermott made his name as a defensive coordinator for the Carolina Panthers under a defensive-minded head coach in Ron Rivera, so it’s difficult to tease out what his impact was. The Panthers’ defense wasn’t exactly a shutdown unit in his tenure, despite being well-coached. McDermott has been a defensive coordinator the last eight seasons between his time in Philadelphia and Carolina. Those defenses ranked in the top 10 in points allowed twice.

    McDermott’s offensive coordinator will be former Broncos OC Rick Dennison, a coach who was attached at the hip to Gary Kubiak for most of the last two decades. The Bills will likely be breaking in a new quarterback, one of many challenges for Dennison in the role. Perhaps McDermott and Dennison are NFL lifers who just needed this chance to show their value. They will have to be exceptional to excel in Buffalo, where they face an uphill task.

    in reply to: PFF says, Donald best defensive player of 2016 #64348
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PFF: WHY AARON DONALD WAS THE NFL’S BEST PASS-RUSHER THIS SEASON

    By SAM MONSON

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-why-aaron-donald-was-the-nfls-best-pass-rusher-this-season/?utm_content=buffer28169&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=nfl

    Los Angeles Rams DT Aaron Donald was recently named the winner of Pro Football Focus’ Defensive Player of the Year and Best Pass-Rusher awards for the 2016 NFL season. To see the winner of every PFF award, visit our NFL awards page.

    The Rams may have returned to Los Angeles and the bright lights of Tinseltown, but the team finished the 2016 season 4-12. With that losing record, very few players on the roster received much positive attention, but defensive tackle Aaron Donald was once again excellent in the heart of the Rams’ defense.

    When recognizing individual achievement at awards time, it’s important to try and look beyond the overall defensive unit. There are obvious yardage and scoring milestones for offensive players that get recognition and celebration, even if the offense they play in has been ineffective or lackluster, but defenders tend to be tarred with the brush of overall unit success or failure. The Rams had a top defense in terms of yards per game and yards per play, but because the offense was so poor, they were 23rd in points per game. Whatever the success of the defense as a whole, an individual defender is just one of 11 players, and no one man can make a defense.

    Aaron Donald led all interior defenders with 82 total pressures this season, a mark that tied for third overall in the NFL. He may have recorded “only” eight sacks, but nobody was better at generating consistent, impactful pressure than Donald, especially when you consider the position he was playing.

    Generating 82 total QB pressures from defensive tackle is not the same as recording them as an edge defender, or even generating slightly more from those perimeter rushing spots. Edge rushers generate pressure at a higher rate than interior rushers. They are typically one-on-one and have less traffic to navigate to get to the QB, or at least to affect his drop. The average edge rusher in the NFL this season generated pressure once every 8.8 pass rushes, but it takes almost five full pass-rushing snaps (13.5) more for an interior rusher to generate the same pressure, on average.

    Donald had fewer pass-rushing snaps than many edge rushers, and yet still outperformed almost all of them in terms of total QB pressures. He generated pressure once every 6.1 pass rushes, which was the best figure of any interior defender, but also a top-10 figure compared to edge rushers (seventh).

    Of course, not all pressure is created equal, and raw numbers can sometimes mislead. Pressure can take the form of a sack after a defender beats a double-team in under two seconds, a clean-up pressure where the QB is forced to move into a pass-rusher’s leverage, or from a defender having an unblocked path straight to the QB.

    Where Donald really separates himself from the pack is in how his pressure comes about. He generated decisive pressure (graded at +1.0 or better in PFF’s incremental, play-by-play grading scale) once every 8.7 rushes. That figure would be the third-best rate of pressure among interior defenders, and it’s only counting Donald’s most impactful pressures.

    The next-closest interior pass-rusher was Arizona’s Calais Campbell, who generated the same level of decisive pressure once every 18 pass-rushing snaps, almost 10 more between those plays than Donald. Put another way, Donald was generating decisive pressure more than twice as often as any other interior pass-rusher on a per-snap basis.

    71 percent of Donald’s pressure was decisive in nature. He was a player that was forcing the issue, and not just benefitting from plays where he was unblocked, or the play was forced his way. Donald was actively defeating blocks and affecting the QB in the pocket more than any other pass-rusher in the league, and at a rate that leaves his true peers—interior pass-rushers and defensive tackles—flailing in his wake.

    Oakland’s Khalil Mack and Denver’s Von Miller each had outstanding seasons themselves, and they may have each posted game-defining impact plays involving strip sacks and fumble recoveries, but their position as edge rushers allows them to have far more plays where they can come at the QB completely unseen, while Donald is almost always going to be rushing from a spot in the quarterback’s line of sight.

    Donald in 2016 may not have been quite as dominant as he was a year ago—he was named PFF’s Best Player of 2015, winning what was then named our Dwight Stephenson Award—but he was still the best defender in the game this past season, and the most unstoppable pass-rushing force in the league. For that, he wins PFF’s award for the Best Pass-Rusher in the game in 2016, as well as Defensive Player of the Year.

    in reply to: "I asked my student why he voted for Trump" #64347
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    t what to make of Trump’s victory. Is it, in the main, a recrudescence of bigotry on American soil—a reactionary scream against a nation less white by the year? Or is it more properly understood as an economically grounded response to the privations that neoliberalism has wracked upon the heartland?

    To me…clearly and obviously both.

    And Trump is no solution to either thing, of course. He’s a worsening of both things.

    ————–
    Agreed.

    w
    v

    Are you sure you agree? Cause…when have you ever called this a recrudescence?

    in reply to: hiring head coaches #64332
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    off the net from jrry32

    The simple truth is that unless you’re getting a proven coach, you have no idea what the results will be. Hell, even then, you’re not guaranteed of anything. Fisher was a proven coach.

    McVay has a couple things clearly going for him that make success a lot more likely. The two most important things to succeeding as a NFL HC are surrounding yourself with a great staff and being capable of leading a NFL locker room.

    It seems that McVay checks both those boxes.

    1. He has put together a great staff of experienced coaches. Based on what we’ve heard, he’s managed to get the #1 DC on the market, the #1 OL Coach on the market, the #1 Special Teams Coach on the market, and a QB Coach with a hell of a lot of experience as an offensive coordinator.

    More on Kromer. Getting him is putting some foolish hope in me. He gives us a top tier OL Coach. We desperately need that. He turned some raw guys into really good OLs.

    His DC, OL Coach, and Special Teams Coach all have NFL HC experience. The most important thing that a head coach can do is surround himself with a quality and experienced staff of assistants. McVay has succeeded in that respect.

    2. McVay’s leadership skills have been praised by every player and coach who have spoken about him. I haven’t heard a single negative word uttered about the guy.

    We’ll see if it was the right move. Success isn’t guaranteed. We might come to find out that McVay isn’t capable of leading as a NFL HC. But as it stands now, we have a lot of reasons to be optimistic.

    Waiting for Shanahan means no Wade Phillips.

    McVay did great things with Kirk Cousins (more than Kyle Shanahan did).

    Unlike our past few coaches, he has hired a veteran staff and an expert to handle the side of the ball he’s not familiar with. (Fisher hired a veteran staff but chose not to hire an offensive expert as coordinator, an equivalent of Williams.)

Viewing 30 posts - 36,331 through 36,360 (of 47,798 total)