Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipantrfl wrote:
PS. WV, remember when we could be proud of the team? Sure, they lost Conference title games. And they couldn’t match up with the Whiners in their glory. But they always played tough football.No one thought SOSAR. We were the Rams. We knew how to defend and run the ball. Even when we lost, we did it with pride.
Damn. What would it feel like to think that people actually RESPECTED us? Can’t remember.
I feel the same way.
Well, it would not surprise me
in the least if this team was 11-5
in season FOUR.I’m sorry, but I’m a ram fan
and it had to be said 🙂w
v
wvParticipant<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>wv wrote:</div>
Year FOUR. Its all about year FOUR
Or five. I forget.
Or six.w
vYep. It’s like the sardonic slogans developed by war-weary GIs in WW II:
“Home alive in ’45”
(Can’t remember the ’46 slogan)
“Heaven in ’47”
“Golden Gate in ’48.”I think a significant mistake
had to be the decision to go with
Jake Long, the former all pro,
but injured LT. It was a gamble
that cost them. Jake just
wasnt an allpro anymore
and was too inconsistent.And i was all for the
signing at the time.Ah well.
w
v
wvParticipantPS. WV, remember when we could be proud of the team? Sure, they lost Conference title games. And they couldn’t match up with the Whiners in their glory. But they always played tough football.
No one thought SOSAR. We were the Rams. We knew how to defend and run the ball. Even when we lost, we did it with pride.
Damn. What would it feel like to think that people actually RESPECTED us? Can’t remember.
Well, yeah, it sucks, alright.
But Ram posters are still cool. 🙂
Its 30 degrees here. Winter
has arrived.w
v
wvParticipant
wvParticipantBreaking my retirement to announce this….Jim Thomas broke the story
What ‘retirement’ ? You CANT retire.
Alrighty then.
Now that, THATS been straightened out,
it’s inter esting news about the
Return of Mr Hill.The Rams continue to…uh…be
the Rams.
The last time we saw Mr Hill
he was throwin a Really bad INT
as i recall. Before that
he looked pretty good.w
v-
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantWell, i think it was an idiotic question
from the reporter: “how important is it that you finish games?”
or somethin like that.
And then TJ says, well yeah we gotta finish games.Might as well ask him: How important is it
to get more points than the other team?w
v
wvParticipantJim Thomas audio — The stadium issue for the first eleven mins, and then football stuff
wvParticipantHighPlainsDrifter wrote:
Do the Rams have a running game? Do they have a top defense?Yes I think the Rams will have those things.
Some people are seeing the fog of losing.
But I think I see the approaching village through that fog.
Mind you, 1. I could be wrong of course, and 2. so far I don’t see a quarterback in that approaching village. Not yet anyway.
Nice looking bakery, though.
Is it an elite bakery
or only a complimentary Bakery?w
v
wvParticipant
wvParticipantespn Bronco blog
==============================
http://espn.go.com/blog/denver-broncos
“…..While the Raiders do feature Khalil Mack, who has forced his share of holding penalties and has pressured opposing quarterbacks with some regularity, the Raiders are currently last in the league in sacks with eight. And the Rams’ defensive front, at least the defensive front the Rams have showed the past four games — 16 sacks combined, including eight against the San Francisco 49ers — figures to be a notch above.With Louis Vasquez at right tackle (his first career start at the position), Manny Ramirez at right guard (where Vasquez was an All-Pro last season) and Will Montgomery getting his first start at center, quarterback Peyton Manning wasn’t sacked and the Broncos rushed for 118 yards.
But the Raiders were able to affect Manning and disrupt the Broncos for most of the first half Sunday when the Broncos were in three-WR sets. They got enough push to deflect four of Manning’s passes at the line of scrimmage, forced Manning into an intentional grounding penalty and forced two interceptions, one coming when defensive end Justin Tuck deflected the ball and dove to make the interception — all in the first half.
Including their time with the Titans, Rams head coach Jeff Fisher, assistant head coach Dave McGinnis and defensive coordinator Gregg Williams may have faced Manning more than any coaches in the league. They figure to pound away at the Broncos’ new look, especially to the right side of the offense into Manning’s face as he sets to throw, to see if the group is up to a more significant challenge.
=============-
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantDo the Rams have a running game? Do they have a top defense? I’m not convinced that the Rams have the “established” components that will take the load off of a young quarterback. I certainly haven’t seen much this season that would indicate that this is the case. The Rams are one of the youngest teams in the league. They could have a couple more young offensive linemen in front of the quarterback, whoever he might be. I don’t believe that the Rams are in the position of those other teams that you mentioned who started young QBs and thrived. A lot can change between now and then, but as of now, color me dubious. I think a young QB plays like a young QB, and the progress of the team is likely to stagnate for a time while the youngster gets acclimated.
I dunno what i think of the offense,
but the defense will be interesting to watch
if Barron is a solid player and if C.Long
can come back strong.As of now, and if it were me, the draft
would be all about QB and OLine and LB.w
v
wvParticipantI think i would try Hill
at this point. Why not?w
vNovember 11, 2014 at 8:18 pm in reply to: Does anyone here believe we can beat Denver on Sunday? #11635
wvParticipantWith Hill as the starter?Maybe.Davis?Absolutely not.
I tend to agree with that.
Austin is a mess right now.
Dunno what Hill is.Course these coaches arent idiots.
If they think Austin gives them
a better chance to win than Hill,
then…..sigh.w
v
wvParticipantLook. Everybody around here was worried that I might attempt suicide if the Rams hired Fisher as coach. I made my views known that I consider him to be one of Satan’s minions.
But.
It is precisely BECAUSE I believed that Fisher was in league with Satan that I accepted him as coach.
If it turns out that he isn’t, that he’s just an ordinary evil guy like Colonel Klink,
then I am going to need professional help.Year FOUR. Its all about year FOUR.
Just keep repeating that. 🙂Oh and btw, we’ve been posting together
since, what, 98 now? — its been an honor.
Truly. An honor.Maybe we’ll see another championship
before we die.
Carry on, Z.I gotta go. I’m baking
rice and books.w
v
“I love Zack and he knows that. But this is exactly where we differ!
Zack is in the fetal position, but my head is in the oven! No amount of semantics can change this.”
Zooey’d For LifeNovember 11, 2014 at 7:39 pm in reply to: Does anyone here believe we can beat Denver on Sunday? #11628
wvParticipantThey’d probly have to knock Peyton out
to do it.I’m lookin forward to seein how
the defense plays against the Denver O.
They might surprise us.The Offense is hopeless, now.
Ah well.w
v
wvParticipantWell i hope RFL is wrong about Fisher
being McClellan. I dunno.If the defense really keeps improving
and gels, i will continue to be pretty optimistic.Hard to judge an offense when the franchise QB
is sitting on the bench. Lets see how the Cards
look with Carson gone now.At any rate, i just enjoy the whole ram-fan thing.
I just kinda smile and shake my head during years like this.
It’ll take more than just one decade of futility
to wear me down 🙂w
vhttp://www.nellaware.com/blog/george-b-mcclellan-quotes.html
“Will you pardon me for asking what the horses of your army have done since the battle of Antietam that fatigues anything?”
–President Abraham Lincoln’s question directed to George B. McClellan, who had excused his lack of action in the fall of 1862 because of exhausted horses. McClellan was removed from command soon afterward.“If he had a million men he would swear the enemy has two millions, and then he would sit down in the mud and yell for three.”
–Edwin M. Stanton, the United States secretary of war commenting on General George B. McClellan. McClellan often overestimated the number of enemy forces opposing him, and so he always needed and wanted more men and more supplies before he could take offensive action.It is called the Army of the Potomac, but it is only McClellan’s bodyguard…If McClellan is not using the army, I should like to borrow it for a while.
–Abraham Lincoln on April 9, 1862, regarding George B. McClellan. McClellan often tested Lincoln’s patience because of his failure to take action against the Confederates. This quote is from a note Lincoln eventually decided not to send.General McClellan, if I understand you correctly, before you strike at the Rebels, you want to be sure of plenty of room so you can run in case they strike back.
–This is from Zachariah Chandler, a member of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War as he was questioning McClellan regarding his inability to take offensive movement against the Rebels.=======
Ultimately, McClellan failed, and history has not been kind to failures. Historian Richard N. Current wrote that “McClellan had his faults. Though fond of Napoleonic poses, he lacked the fighting blood of Bonaparte. He was slow, overcautious, duped by his spies’ fantastic exaggerations of enemy strength. Yet he had real abilities, particularly in drilling troops and inspiring them with loyalty and trust. To some extent his faults were merely defects of his virtues. He sought to make the most of the Union preponderance in men and resources – to win the war by strategy, not butchery.” 13 McClellan biographer Stephen W. Sears called McClellan “inarguably the worst” Union general to head the Army of the Potomac. 14 James Russell Lowell wrote in 1864 that McClellan possessed “every theoretic qualification, but no ardor, no leap, no inspiration. A defensive general in an earthen redoubt not an ensign to rally enthusiasm and inspire devotion.”15 Historian Kenneth P. Williams called McClellan “a vain and unstable man, with considerable military knowledge, who sat a horse well and wanted to be President.”16 Lincoln aides John G. Nicolay and John Hay determined to destroy McClellan’s reputation in their ten-volume biography of the President. “I have toiled and labored through ten chapters over McClellan,” wrote Hay to Nicolay. “I think I have left the impression of his mutinous imbecility, and I have done it in a perfectly courteous manner…It is of the utmost moment that we should seem fair to him, while…destroying him.”17 …
http://abrahamlincolnsclassroom.org/abraham-lincolns-contemporaries/abraham-lincoln-and-george-b-mcclellan/
wvParticipant“…fluke injury to the Rams’ top deep threat resulted in more damage than anticipated.
“He did just about everything you possibly can to the shoulder,’’ Fisher said. “You talk about rotator cuff, labrum, bicep tendon, just everything. It was a successful surgery, a successful procedure, but he’s going to be immobilized for quite some time.’’
Author
======================Damn.
w
v
wvParticipantI am not a fan of statements like “I need to learn the game is four quarters long.”
That is a meaningless statement, to me, whether coaches say it or players.
w
vhttp://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/13498/austin-davis-not-the-answer-for-rams-at-qb
Wagoner“I didn’t play well enough to win today,” Davis said. “I think the thing I’m learning really quick is you can play well for three and a half quarters but you’ve got to play four. You can’t have a single letdown and right now I’m having those and it’s costing our football team. I’ve got to stay the course, stay strong and keep getting better and eliminate these mistakes, mainly turnovers, that are costing our football team.”
(On the Peterson INTI just underthrew the ball,” Davis said. “I don’t really have an answer for it. I don’t understand it. We got the look we were looking for, I thought Chris ran a good route and won, the ball didn’t go where I wanted it to.”
(On Peterson INT number two)”The second one, I just threw it high and it gets tipped around,” Davis said. “Two critical plays, you can’t turn the football over. We knew coming in that was kind of their thing. They kind of live off the turnover and you saw it there at the end.”
In nine games, Davis’ fourth-quarter passer rating is 68.1 with a QBR of 23.8, which includes a 12.0 and 0.1 on Sunday.
“It can’t happen,” Davis said. “It’s killing our defense. They’re playing their tails off. For me to have those letdowns, it’s really tough. I’ve got to get a lot better and I can’t do that.”
wvParticipantzn wrote:
Eternal Ramnation wrote:
When your OL allows 6 sacks we might as well put Hecker back there. Davis is the perfect fit for this horrible OL as he is durable.He won’t win many but when you allow 6 sacks you don’t win anyways.Was that all the OL, though? It’s an important question. I put as much of that on Davis. I don’t think he handles the pressure. There are qbs that handle the blitz, and I don’t think that Davis has that yet.
Yeah, I think most of the sacks could be attributed to him holding the ball too long. He was indecisive.
How did Greg Robinson look?
Better than sammy watkins? 🙂
w
v
wvParticipantWell are there free agent options at QB next year?
Or is the draft the only avenue.Such a strange year/team. Earlier in the year
a lot of us were thinking the QB situation was lookin
pretty good but the defense was a mess.
Now, of course things are reversed, kinda.Year Three, has not turned out well
has it.I wonder what their record would be if Bradford
was healthy? Would they have won more games?
The same? Fewer?w
v-
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
wv.
November 10, 2014 at 7:22 am in reply to: combined "today's game" & "arizona game lamentations" threads #11542
wvParticipantTypical 2014 Rams — the losses are full
of signs of a good team in the making,
and the wins are full of indications
of a team with issues.w
v
wvParticipantwv wrote:
21Dog wrote:
It appears the Austin Davis Bandwagon to Canton has a couple of flat tires.I havent seen the game yet, but i saw the
low-lights, and it looked like the
pick-6 was a catchable ball. Britt
didnt catch it though.I think they still need a WR.
And a QB.w
vBritt could have helped Davis, but it was an off target pass thrown from a short distance.
Yeah, definitely another one of AustinD’s high-balls,
but i’d say 50 percent of it is on Britt. I’ve not
been all that impressed with Britt this year.Davis is obviously, not the answer at QB, btw,
to state the obvious. Granted he’s playing
tough teams, on the road, without Quick, etc.
Still, he’s just too limited.I’m readin Carson is probly done for the
year. ACL, maybe. Too bad. I like the Cards.w
v
wvParticipantIt appears the Austin Davis Bandwagon to Canton has a couple of flat tires.
I havent seen the game yet, but i saw the
low-lights, and it looked like the
pick-6 was a catchable ball. Britt
didnt catch it though.I think they still need a WR.
And a QB.w
vNovember 9, 2014 at 8:21 pm in reply to: combined "today's game" & "arizona game lamentations" threads #11505
wvParticipantThe cards just win.
They dont look good,
they just win.Its their year.
w
v
wvParticipantI’ve been really frustrated with and critical of this D, but I think that you have to give them credit for that game. Gore was not a factor, the young secondary played as well as you could hope for, and the pass rush was ferocious. The final drive was upsetting. Folding when the game is on the line – even when they’ve been dominating to that point – does seem to haunt them repeatedly, and I it was excruciating to see it again Sunday. RFL’s right that when the game was on the line, only a SF mistake saved the game, but aside from that it looked like an entirely different unit.
Well, i think he’s right and wrong.
Cause what i see out of the Rams D
is a continuous display of good plays
(not just ‘ok’ plays, but ‘good’)
followed by bonehead-awful plays.And that is a different animal
than a defense that just constantly
gets outmuscled or outplayed
play after play.The D is not ‘just’ ‘bad’.
Its good ‘and’ bad.
Its weird.Unfortunately it amounts to the same
thing in the short term — losses.There’s hope for the longterm though.
I think.w
v
wvParticipantI predict TA scores on a punt return and some great plays from the Rams special teams. On the passing game the Rams should go with the bigger guys Cook Britt Kendricks. The Cards secondary is very good and the only reason they are able to blitz so much.The Cards OL sucks I predict the wide awake giant (DL) leaves a cleat print on Palmers butt.
Well, i dunno. I dont foresee Palmer holding the ball
very long. I think the Cards will just
dink and dunk and wait for the Rams
to self-destruct.Sure would be inter-esting though,
if the Rams were in last place,
but beat the Seahawks, 49ers and Cards
all in a four game stretch.w
v-
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantWell, the Cards remind me of the old Patriots.
Teams lose and cant figure out how it happened.I’d guess the Rams will keep it close
and lose in the fourth quarter as Palmer
drives the length of the field against
the Rams D.w
v
wvParticipantWell i guarantee you if it had been a
QB slammed, it woulda been a penalty and fine.
Are the rules different for RBs?w
v
wvParticipant=============================================
(Ram43)
Rams at Cardinals: Full Preview of the Week 10 Matchup [www.insidestl.com]
Shane GreyOn Sunday, the St. Louis Rams will square off with the Arizona Cardinals at the University of Phoenix Stadium in a key NFC West matchup. St. Louis will arrive in Glendale with a 3-5 mark after winning two of their last three games. Arizona, meanwhile will enter the action with the NFL’s best record at 7-1.
How are the Cardinals Doing It?
When considering a myriad of statistical barometers, it would appear that the Cardinals are securing victories with smoke and mirrors. In breaking down the numbers, one would be hard-pressed to believe that Arizona is really sitting at 7-1.
Seriously, does the following look like the NFL’s best team to you?Offensively, the Cardinals rank thirty-first in passer percentage, thirtieth in yards per carry and twenty-eighth in rushing yards per game. Defensively, they rank thirtieth in sacks, worst in passing yards per game, No. 25 in passer rating allowed and thirty-first in forced fumbles. In addition, they check in at just a so-so fourteenth in both scoring offense and points allowed per game.
So, how have the Cardinals managed to reel off the league’s best won-loss percentage this season when considering the above? As is often the case, numbers don’t always tell the entire story. For example, Arizona’s aforementioned last place passing D is probably at least a little better than it appears on paper.
“They’re getting up and teams are just throwing it and going two-minute,” Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher explained this week. “They’re giving up plays just to protect the end zone and things like that. It’s very, very misleading.”
St. Louis quarteback Austin Davis essentially reiterated Fisher’s thoughts on the Arizona air D.
“I think stats can be very misleading,” Davis suggested. “Obviously, their record’s great so teams are down and they’re throwing the ball more late in the game. They’re softening up and giving up yards. We don’t look a lot at the stats. They’re definitely really good at stopping the run and we’re going to have to throw and complete the ball and do some things in the passing game.”
According to Arizona Head Coach Bruce Arians, much of their success boils down to knowing how to close out games. While the Rams have struggled to finish several contests that they could have won, the Cardinals consistently find ways to perform successfully late in the action.
“I think that we’ve played hard for 60 minutes and kind of found ways to win games,” Arians said in a conference call this week. “I don’t think we’re anything special, but we’ve managed to win ball games in fourth quarters. That’s very hard to do. I think they’ve learned that’s when games are won and lost. Most teams, it’s very hard to teach a team how to win. You find ways to do that and then you start believing that it’s going to happen.”
Cardinals quartback Carson Palmer echoed similar thoughts to Arians in regard to finishing games off.
“What we’ve done a good job at is beating the teams we’re supposed to and then we close games out against good teams. The last two years, we’ve really been a fourth quarter team.”
Avoiding and Creating Interceptions
Two of the major keys to Arizona’s success to the midway point of the docket has been its ability to avoid throwing interceptions — the fewest in the NFL with just two — and its propensity for securing picks — the second most in the league at twelve. Overall, the Cardinals are plus twelve in turnover differential, the second best such number in the category league-wide.
Offensively, Palmer’s quick release has been a contributing factor in their low rate of interceptions.
“We don’t hold on to balls now to see a guy come open, we’re throwing them open,” Arians said. “So the interceptions are down. That, and you quit forcing the ball to one guy and start spreading it around to eight or nine. He (Palmer) has done a great job of that and just taking what a defense gives him.”Defensively, the Cardinals have corraled the NFL’s second most picks, something that certainly has not gone unnoticed by either the Rams head coach or the club’s quarterback.
“Well, they’re creating pressure and they’re making plays,” Fisher said. “They’re a good man-to-man cover team and everybody’s having opportunities to get their hands on the balls and they’re making the plays.”
“Yeah, I think a lot of their turnovers have come from pressure looks and guys just making bad decisions,” Davis suggested Wednesday. “I think we can do a good job of getting balls completed in those looks. There’s a lot of grass to run (after the catch). It’s kind of a high risk, high reward type of defense. So far this year there’s been a lot of reward.”
Davis, for his part, realizes he and his offense must do a steller job at protecting the pigskin.
“We’ve got do a great job of protecting the football,” Davis said, “and that starts with me making better decisions and the running backs holding onto to the rock and the receivers doing the same”
A week ago, a stingy St. Louis defense helped overcome Davis’ two turnovers in the week nine win. This week, however, the Rams likely will struggle to triumph if Davis again turns it over twice.
Will Davis Respond?
Speaking of Davis, how well will the Rams young signal caller bounce back from his worst start as a pro, one that culminated in just 105 passing yards, a paltry 44.6 rating and two picks?
At least according to St. Louis Offensive Coordinator Brian Schottenheimer, he should rebound just fine.“A couple weeks back when we were playing really, really well he was the same guy,” Schottenheimer asserted. “He’s the same guy now. He adjusts well. He sees things really, really well. On the interception last week, he said, ‘Hey I saw the guy, I thought I could get over him.’ The one (S Antoine) Bethea got, he just underthrew that one. Again, just very, very poised and he handles all the adjustments and things we do really, really well.”
As for what Arizona expects from Davis, if it is indicative of what their head coach conveyed, they are anticipating solid play from the Rams QB.
“I’m really impressed with Austin Davis,” Arians said. “I know a lot about Southern Mississippi, and when you break Brett’s (Favre) records you’ve done something special. I really think this kid has a great future. He can make every throw. He’s mobile, but he’s not looking to run, he’s looking to throw.”
Can the Rams Maintain Balance Vs. Arizona’s Run D?
More often than not, NFL offenses are at their best when they are relatively balanced. It makes them generally less predictable, helps keep defenses honest and aids in setting up the play action pass.
It came as no surprise, then, when Schottenheimer suggested that his St. Louis offense was most effective when it had a somewhat equal ratio of runs to passes: “We’re at our best when we’re balanced and when we can get the running game going,” Schotteneimer said.
Of course, maintaining a balanced approach may be easier said than done against the Cardinals run defense, a unit that is ranked second-best in regard to rushing yards allowed per game and third-best in terms of yards per carry relinquished.
One of the major challenges in putting together a productive ground game against Arizona is their frequency of putting extra players in the box.
“Number one, it’s an eight-man front,” Schottenheimer said.”They’ve got safeties down all around the line of scrimmage. They jam the front. The linebackers play as fast downhill across the line of scrimmage as probably anybody I’ve seen. It’s just an aggressive scheme. They move, they penetrate, they knock people back… which makes it hard to find running lanes.”
If the Rams are to get their run game going, it more than likely will again come via a diversified, back-by-committee approach, as Fisher has not named a starter there and spoke of utilizing any number of runners against the Cardinals.
Eying Ellington
Staying on the running back theme, Arizona’s Andre Ellington is a highly productive, do-it-all performer from the Cardinals backfield.
The second year Clemson alum is not only on pace to chew up over 1,000 yards on the ground this fall, but is also on track to reel in over 60 receptions.While not in the same caliber of a Jamal Charles or Marshall Faulk, Ellington is highly versatile and cut from a similar cloth.
“They’re using him out of the backfield,” Fisher stated. “He free releases a lot. They create match-ups on linebackers and defensive backs. He’s got great quickness. Then they use him in the running game. He’ll bounce outside or cutback. (He’s) a lot like (Chiefs Rcool smiley Jamaal Charles.”
On Sunday, the St. Louis defense will have to account for Ellington on all downs and in all situations. Arizona will use him in any number of ways, and the Rams will have to be ready for the multifaceted back at all times.
Brown Is Ballin’
When the Cardinals drafted wide receiver John Brown in the third round of the 2014 NFL Draft, they surely couldn’t have hoped for much more than they have received in year one from the Division II Pittsburgh State product.
Through eight games, the 5’10” Brown has turned in four touchdowns, 24 catches and a 14.6 yard per catch average.
Brown, with 4.3 speed, already has a 100 yard game and a 75 yard TD on his brand-new professional resume.
To this stage, his play has certainly pleased his head coach.
“John is an explosive player,” Arians said. “He can take a short pass and take it to the house or he can just take the top off the coverage. But he’s fearless. I was shocked he dropped a ball over the middle for the first time last Sunday. It was like ‘Whoa. Maybe he is human for a rookie,’ you know? Because he has a very mature attitude, just like a five year vet when it comes to preparation already.”
His quarterback, Palmer, is just as impressed.
“John Brown, the young rookie, he’s just done a phenomenal job,” Palmer asserted. “He’s extremely smart. He’s come in and learned the offense really fast and it’s not a very simple offense, especially for a receiver that plays multiple situations. He’s come in and really just picked up everything quickly and asked the right questions and done the right things to warrant play time.”
Certainly, it hasn’t hurt Brown’s cause that he has been mentored and led by the example that is future Hall of Fame receiver Larry Fitzgerald.
“Larry’s just a true pro,” Palmer said of his veteran wideout. “He comes in and he works his butt off every day. He leads by example and shows the young guys what it takes to work and what it takes to be great.”
Fitzgerald, 31, is still highly productive and remains the go-to guy in the Arizona offense. To date, Fitzgerald has racked up 35 receptions, 14.7 yards per catch and two scores.
“Larry’s still very, very good,” Fisher said. “He has just a big catch radius that makes him so hard (to cover).”
Is Sack City Back for Good?
A week ago, the Rams more than doubled their previous season-long sack total of six by exploding with eight of them against the 49ers.
One cannot help but wonder if the suddenly resurgent St. Louis pass rush will continue to resemble their preseason #sackcity touting, or will they look more like the unit that was last in the league in sacks for much of the campaign?Even though the Cardinals’ Palmer is not one of the more fleet-of-foot QBs the Rams will face, he is good at avoiding pressure and he’s been sacked the eighth least to this point of 2014.
“He’s really good in the pocket, he steps up and he’ll step up in either gap if you get the outside rush,” Fisher said. “He has a good feel for moving in the pocket. What he’s done for years is he keeps his eyes down field. The eyes don’t come off on the rush. His eyes are down field all the time. He’s got a natural, instinctive movement and flow in the pocket and that’s what makes him affective.
That’s why he’s not getting sacked very often.”Palmer certainly isn’t an easy guy to successfully pressure, but St. louis needs to at least make him unfomfortable in the pocket on Sunday to disrupt the Arizona air game and possibly add an interception or two to the Cardinals league low total of just two picks.
November 7, 2014 at 5:16 pm in reply to: Is Bruce Arians an "offensive genius" ? + Arians wired v. Washington #11387
wvParticipant
Darren Urban on Cards -
This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

