Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 11,671 through 11,700 (of 12,559 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AD #14101
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    this quote really caught my eye.

    Opponents have a Total QBR of 44 against the Rams in 388 dropbacks with Donald on the field. That would rank fourth in the NFL. The Rams have allowed a Total QBR of 74 in 147 dropbacks with Donald off the field, which would rank 31st.

    Yeah, that is a startling stat.
    One of the most interesting Stats
    of the season, really.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Time to Mock: McShay's Mock #14088
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    1. La’el Collins OT
    2. Cameron Erving OT

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1824825/lael-collins
    STRENGTHS: Collins possesses a square-ish build that makes him appear better suited to guard. His frame belies his quick feet, an attribute that when combined with his long arms, impressive strength and aggression make him a devastating run blocker. Collins is often the quickest of LSU’s offensive linemen off the snap and he routinely drives his assignment off the line of scrimmage with pure power, creating easy running lanes for LSU’s backs. He’s surprisingly quick to the second level and has good body control to adjust to moving targets.

    As a pass blocker, Collins shows good initial quickness in his kick-slide and uses his long reach to maintain the arc. When he gets his hands on opponents and remains square, it is generally lights out for the defender.

    WEAKNESSES: He does not possess elite balance and can be challenged by speed-rushers. He’ll over-compensate occasionally and leave the inside open for counters.

    Collins’ aggression is admirable but also leads to mistakes. Rather than patiently waiting for defenders to come to him, Collins will occasionally lunge, making himself top-heavy and prone to slipping down the body of his opponent. This can lead to his hands getting too low or slipping onto the side and/or back of defenders, which invites them to swim over the top of him to disengage.

    –Rob Rang (8/18/14)
    ————————-
    STRENGTHS: Versatile athlete who has transitioned from the defensive side of the ball to start at both left tackle and center. Boasts a pretty remarkable combination of size (6-feet-5, 309 pounds) and athleticism, and blends length with surprisingly light feet and flexibility.

    As a run-blocker, displays the toughness and aggression that made him an impact performer on the other side of the football as he works to finish opponents with strong hands and impressive natural power in his lower half. Frequently asked to block at the second level. He pulls smoothly, showing impressive initial quickness and acceleration for a man of his size.

    Possesses the light feet and fluidity to thwart some of the nation’s best edge rushers at tackle, while also showing the ability to seal off defensive tackles at center.

    Shows smooth athleticism in his kick-step to handle speed off the edge as well as the strong hands to latch on and control his opponent. Perhaps most impressive, Erving plays with good knee bend, which helps him win the leverage battle and generally anchor well against bull rushes.

    WEAKNESSES: Simply needs to become a more consistent technician. Footwork gets a bit sloppy in pass protection at times and he’ll bend at the waist to catch the rush rather than absorbing with his lower half. Tendency to rely too heavily on his upper body when battling, often stopping his feet when engaged.

    Aggression sometimes works against Erving. He’ll drop his head on contact, providing defenders opportunities to wash through him. Fails to adjust when blocking on the move, at times. While he’s quick to the second level, Erving too often loses track of his target, winding up where he thought the play was going to go only to have his assignment run past him. Each is a correctable skill that the athletic big man should improve upon as he gains experience.

    –Rob Rang & Derek Stephens (11/20/14)
    Player Overview
    =====================================

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    • This reply was modified 11 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: La on GW/JF #14087
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    it’s funny that the defense is the unit that’s gone through so much flux during the fisher era while the offense has enjoyed continuity under schottenheimer.

    but yeah. the defense will be out of excuses if williams stays. and there’s no reason to think that there will be another coordinator change there. another slow start will make my doubt grow bigger.

    one thought. i wonder what the rams do if shaq thompson is available in the first round.

    i could totally see them going for a guy like him – a hybrid lb/safety type – and then going offensive line in the later rounds.

    I tend to agree with La in the sense that
    I’m not totally sold on the D yet.
    Somethin just doesnt feel quite right about it.
    There’s just somethin about it that doesnt quite
    seem totally ‘sound.’ I’m no expert, and i cant really
    explain it, but I know it when i see it.

    Having said that, I think the D would certainly
    be ‘good enough’ if the Offense would pull its weight.

    GW won a Ring with the Saints with a good, ornery D,
    that created turnovers — and an Offense that blew
    teams out.

    I think the Rams can win with GW, but i doubt the D
    is ever really consistent, and they need
    a complementary O. (kinda stating the obvious)

    w
    v

    in reply to: La on GW/JF #14078
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    La on next year
    ————————–
    Laram

    I’m not the biggest G. Williams fan, so I might be a bit biased in my assessment but if you look at his history his defenses have been up and down. He’s had just as many bottom feeder defenses as top level one’s.

    Teams will have all off season to study the Rams defenses and how to attack it. I think we’ll see more of teams running the Rams out of the Big Nickel. I don’t like the pass defense, I don’t think you can survive giving up 70% comp rate.

    What I saw in the Arizona games concern me.

    I also feel that JL and Jo-Lonn have declined and will continue to do so. So that means either an upgrade outside or more Big Nickel.

    So we’ll see what they do in the off-season, and how they see the defense.

    …As I’ve said before Carson would have shredded the Rams D.

    I’m not buying the hype, I still see holes and some good in-game counters by smart coordinators.

    Washington and Oakland are a mess and the rushing stats against are not indicative of what’s transpiring in the games.

    Redskins – 9 rushes
    Broncos – 9 rushes

    When a team actually stuck with the run, AZ had 143 yds on about 29 atts

    The Rams have had very few rushing atts against. Even in the SD game although Matthews had 105 yds he only had 12 carries, they had only 19 total.

    I’m not convinced.
    ==========================

    in reply to: Do you need high picks to build a winner? #14077
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Patriots would be nowhere without Tom Brady. They got lucky as hell in drafting him as we did in signing Kurt Warner. Without Brady, the Patriots with Belichick would be just like the Cleveland Browns with Belichick. The Patriots also have signed a lot of low end free agents and have gotten a lot of value from them – Randy Moss, LeGarrett Blount, Darrelle Revis, Brandon Lafell, etc… and I believe that many FAs are attracted to the patriots because of Brady, not Belichick.

    Well, Brady is a great one,
    but they have managed to surround him
    with a Good Oline year after year.
    They just seem to plug in RBs
    and WRs.

    w
    v

    in reply to: GRITS (ie. the 12/16 to ? "LA thread") #14076
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    If your around: looks like no one including the Rams are coming back here any time soon.

    http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/

    Isnt that an article about the Chargers?

    w
    v

    in reply to: SF Cuts Ray McDonald #14074
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “As a financial matter, McDonald was signed for next year, with a cap number of $6,475,985. There will be $4,609,971 of dead money, and $1,806,014 in cap savings, per Spotrac. But the 49ers have chosen to put financial considerations as well as football ability on hold as the crisis surrounding this season has been ratcheted upward yet again.”

    in reply to: SF Cuts Ray McDonald #14072
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Kaepernik assesses the situation:

    “It’s tough. He’s a good friend to a lot of people on this team,” Kaepernick said. “No one around him ever thought bad of him. He was always a good person to everyone around here, so hopefully it’s just a misunderstanding.”
    http://www.csnbayarea.com/49ers/kaepernick-you-have-abide-high-standard

    ———————–
    http://www.csnbayarea.com/49ers/ray-mcdonald-straw-broke-jed-yorks-resolve
    Vid
    “…More to the point, though, it is an example that the 49ers have had enough of not only McDonald but of the season in its totality, one which ended Sunday with a 17-7 loss at Seattle. Between the stadium’s shortcomings, the ongoing jousts with head coach Jim Harbaugh, York’s ill-advised postgame tweet after the first Seattle loss the McDonald issues, the suspension of linebacker Aldon Smith and the on-field struggles that turned a Super Bowl contender into a hard-to-watch also-ran, York has seemingly determined that his patience has been exhausted.

    This could signal the beginning of a full-on restructuring/rebuilding of not only the coaching staff, which would have been expected, but on the organization’s general rules of operation. …”

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Offensive line woes dragging down Rams #14058
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    >wv wrote:
    A good personnel/coaching team
    with cap-space, “ought” to be able to fix
    this OLine.

    That only leaves that…um…one other
    little problem.

    w
    v

    Yeah. I know.

    Is Mason the guy?

    Maybe they need a 2nd round RB this time.

    I pree-dict, Mason fumbles in the Seattle
    game.
    I think good defenses are gonna
    separate Tre from the ball.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    2-12 and 2-12

    Titans
    vs
    Jaguars

    Thursday Nite Football.

    Does it get any better than
    this?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Offensive line woes dragging down Rams #14055
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    wv wrote:
    I dunno if Barksdale is coming back
    or if they should even want him back.
    He hasn’t been all that impressive
    in the second half of the year.

    I think Barksdale will be back. I think he’s better playing next to Saffold. I also think that he could work on technique issues in the off-season. I ALSO think starting ROTs are not that hard to find and they could add someone behind him in any number of ways.

    Replacing 3 linemen in one year? A lot to ask. But it’s G, C, and ROT, which are not big challenges. I looked up PFF rankings on OGs, for example, and 75% of their top 12 are NOT 1st round picks.

    In their line-building histories, both Boudreau and Fisher have been in situations where they turned OLs around in one year. Though…they ain’t gonna do it with 3 rookies. I think they would rather eat their own fingers than start 3 rookie linemen.

    Yeah, the OLine problems are fixable in
    one offseason. A good personnel/coaching team
    with cap-space, “ought” to be able to fix
    this OLine.

    That only leaves that…um…one other
    little problem.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Do you need high picks to build a winner? #14054
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah, i would say the Patriot lesson is
    have a great coach and great assistants
    and have yourself a great QB who wont
    break the bank.

    And even then, its tough to win it All.

    Having said that, it is interesting how
    some teams can manage to put together
    good teams year after year, without
    relying on high picks. There’s gotta be
    some good personnel guyz in those organizations.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Offensive line woes dragging down Rams #14050
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    …and is Barrett Jones a starter or
    a bust ?

    w
    v
    ———————————–
    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/jones-hoping-for-brighter-days-ahead-with-rams/article_6b75335c-fde7-54c4-a19f-fba46a35d736.html

    See link….“So that was frustrating,” Jones said. “I feel like I lost some ground there. I’m definitely starting to get it back; starting to get close to feeling like I was.”

    When the regular season ends in 12 days, Jones will return to his hometown in Memphis and attack the offseason with his personal trainer.

    “Hopefully I can have that same kind of offseason and training camp next year where I can be noticed as a player that’s really improved,” he said. “Hopefully that’s the case, and hopefully I can start next year. That’s my goal.

    “This is obviously a huge offseason for me. This is a big kind of defining moment. So I’m gonna just really tear it up this offseason. Work extremely hard. And just kinda make it a goal to just get better in every area. Get stronger. Get faster. Get my body back to where it needs to be.”

    Exactly where that potential starting position is on the offensive line remains a mystery. Remember, Jones started two years at right guard, one year at left tackle, and one year at center at Alabama….

    see link
    ========================

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Offensive line woes dragging down Rams #14048
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So the Oline next year is..what?

    LT – Greg Robinson
    G – ?
    C – ?
    G – R Saffold
    RT – ?

    I dunno if Barksdale is coming back
    or if they should even want him back.
    He hasn’t been all that impressive
    in the second half of the year.

    Who are the Free Agents this year
    on the OLine?
    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: We will be drafting a QB nextyear. #13976
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    If the Rams decide to go with a rookie QB
    next year…let us hope it does
    not look like this:
    http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2014121404/2014/REG15/bengals@browns#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000443236&tab=recap

    in reply to: Which game is more important to you to win? Giants or Seahawks? #13973
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i cant see them beating
    Seattle in Seattle, with a backup QB.
    Just cant see it.
    So unless they knock out Russell Wilson
    or unless the game means nothing to Seattle
    that’ll be a big fat “L”

    Year 4 though — I’ll be surprised
    if they dont get ten wins.

    w
    v

    in reply to: QB Killers #13972
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Is it just me or are the Rams whacking QBs at an alarming rate? We started with our own guys – Bradford and Hill (who returned) and then moved on to Palmer, McCoy, Stanton…anybody else? Would you really want to be Eli Manning or Rusty Wilson right now? I’d call in sick just in case. How pissed are the Cardinals?

    Yeah, and they Bulgerized Bulger, too.
    And then there was that whole
    Kurt Warner pinky thing.

    Merry Holiday.

    w
    v

    in reply to: La on GW/JF #13960
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I just thot I’d list the losses
    just soze i could look at em

    Minn 34-6
    Dallas 34-31
    Philly 34-28
    SF 31-17
    KC 34-7

    Ariz 31-14
    SanD 27-24
    Ariz 12-6

    The defense was just a mess
    the first half of the year,
    though, i never thought they
    were being ‘overpowered’. Just
    a lot of mistakes.

    (course, the refs did steal the Dallas game)

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Rams News Recap: Dec. 15 #13958
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I thot the Randy-K article
    was pretty sensible.

    w
    v

    in reply to: qbs who have started for the Rams since the 1995 move #13933
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dunno, but this whole thread feels
    a little quarterback-centric to me.

    I’d like to suggest a list of
    the Long-snappers since the Rams
    moved to St.Louis.

    w
    v

    in reply to: 7-9 again. Officially time to start talking draft. #13866
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>I like Scherff, but I figured he would be gone when we picked. Picking a pure guard is ok, but then they have to be a starter and a hell of a starter. imo</span>

    Lets say the Rams pick at 15 — you think he would be gone by 15? A guard taken before 15 ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: 7-9 again. Officially time to start talking draft. #13862
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Just somethin Alyoshamucci posted when asked
    if he would really take a C and OG high
    in the draft:

    “Interior line is the richest position in the top end of the draft, players between 15 and 75 are going to solidify a lot of lines . . and there are a lot of college OTs that are going to go inside.”

    (on Scherff)
    “He’s probably the nastiest O lineman I’ve seen in some time. He’s reallllly strong with heavy hands.

    Basically he has everything I want in an OG.

    I put him a hair behind Martin because Martin was so smooth. I put him decently above Warford for intelligence and tenacity.”
    —————————————
    “BUT if we miss out on Scherff due to a trade down, or from picking another position, these guys are really pretty closely rated for me behind him.

    FSU 54 ORG Tre’ Jackson 6-4 330 So.
    Jr.

    FSU 70 ORG/OLG Matias 6-6 325 Sr.
    Sr.

    DUKE 77 ORG Tomlinson 6-3 320 So.
    Jr.
    Sr.

    I mean VERY close behind. I wouldn’t be all bent if we wound up with one of these guys as consolation while picking up another 3rd or 4th round pick, or because we waited until the 2nd because Kevin White or Amari Cooper fell to us. I don’t think all of those guys could possibly be gone before we pick in the second.

    Also, of note, including Cam Erving now playing OC, who I am loving at that position, FSU has the best Interior Line I have seen at the college level.”

    w
    v

    in reply to: Next years scheduled teams #13860
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    bnw wrote:
    Is it possible the Rams can get a favorable schedule next year? The final game always in Seattle is getting old too. Time for some good breaks to go this teams way.

    wv wrote:
    Well, the last decade sucked alright.

    But it does appear we are on the cusp of some good years. Looks like they are finally at a place where one ‘good’ offseason could fill all the holes.

    w
    v

    I agree that the team is reaching a higher level. Even with the last game. I mean people are bitterly disappointed that they did not defeat the team with the best record in football, which means they EXPECTED the Rams to beat the team with the best record in football. That tells me that the expectations bar has been raised…and rightly so.

    We are moving from the era where people complain that they don’t have a winning record, to the era where they complain they can’t win playoff games, and maybe even the era where people complain that they can’t win back to back superbowls.

    In terms of the schedule?

    I think they can do this new schedule.

    Home: Arizona, San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Tampa Bay

    Away: Arizona, San Francisco, Seattle, Green Bay, Minnesota, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Washington

    If they are going to be as good as we expect, then:

    * they ought to win the games they ought to win (Chicago and Tampa at home, Minn. and Washington on the road)

    * they ought to sweep at least one division opponent. I mean they’ve done it before! they were 4-1-1 against the division in 2012. They beat Seattle and SF once each THIS year, and this year was the crazy up and down year.

    * they ought to beat some division leaders or at least division contenders. Heck they beat Denver in 2014, and New Orleans and Indy in 2013. In 2015, that includes Detroit, Cleveland, Baltimore, and the Bengals.

    The one REALLY tough game they face IMO is Green Bay in Green Bay.

    I agree with all that.

    I dont have any doubt
    Snisher, GW and BS can build a playoff team.
    The next two years will bring playoff games.

    Not sure they can win a Ring, though.
    But playoffs? — sure.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    • This reply was modified 11 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: Next years scheduled teams #13838
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, the last decade sucked alright.

    But it does appear we are on the
    cusp of some good years.
    Looks like they are finally at a place
    where one ‘good’ offseason could
    fill all the holes.

    w
    v

    in reply to: 7-9 again. Officially time to start talking draft. #13814
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    PS I don’t like what I read about Hundley.

    Also, I hope they don’t limit acquiring linemen to the draft.

    I cant imagine a scenario where
    they went into the season without
    a coupla new free agent OLinemen.
    I think they will make the OLine
    their priority. QB will kinda be
    a wildcard, but they will want
    a good Line. They cant get over
    the 8-8 hump without a stout OLine.

    And its do-able now. Its do-able
    in one offseason.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Fisher… 12/12/… transcript #13812
    Avatar photowv
    Participant
    in reply to: Fisher… 12/12/… transcript #13811
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Where can I find these Arians’ comments?

    I think i saw them in a couple of the Jim Thomas articles
    in the thread with the reporters’ articles.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Offensive line woes dragging down Rams #13810
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I thought that our defensive line whipped their offensive line pretty solid,” Arians said. “When they were making tackles behind the line of scrimmage, there was usually an offensive lineman holding onto their legs but somehow those flags never got called.”
    “But we were tackling them for losses, so it didn’t matter.”

    LoL. This amuses me.

    This Division has some real characters
    in the coaching ranks.

    I just cant work up any antipathy for Arians
    yet. As far as a villain goes, he’s
    no Harbaugh in my book. Not yet, anyway.

    I will probly root for the Cards in the playoffs,
    i guess.

    w
    v

    in reply to: 2nd ARZ game: reactions from around the net #13809
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    alyoshamucci
    Mini mock draft.

    1) Brandon Scherff OG. He’s not a tackle. He’ll slide to us as a result, and we wont have to worry about OG for a decade.

    2) This is an interesting round for me. A WR will likely be here, but I like some of the talent that will slide. A LB, and there will be superior talent at DE. I’m going to go LB though, to make sure we have a backup for JL when he ages . . Kendricks from UCLA is my guy unless AJ Johnson or Benardrick Mckinney falls. Of course, I could also go Shane Carden or Brandon Bridge here. I don’t have a real reason to bite on QB with Bradford still in the mix though.

    3) Gallek OC Boston College . . he’s going to rise up the charts after the senior bowl, and if I had to take him in the second I’d do it.

    5) Dupree DE Kentucky. 6-4 260 and mean on a terrible team. I would take either he or his counterpart Zegarret Davis (sp?) at 6-6 265. One should be there. Both are a little raw but supremely talented.

    7) Cam Worthy WR ECU Overshadowed by Hardy, the NCAA all time receiving leader, his ability has caught my eye every game I’ve watched of theirs.

    UDFA Uzomah TE Auburn. 6-5 268.
    <span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>This guy always has good stuff.</span>

    Hmmmmm. No QB? Really?

    I would take a QB rather than a LB
    I suppose. I refuse to believe
    there are no good QBs in this
    great land of ours. This is America.
    Land of the Free. Home of the brave.
    I believe there is a red, white, and blue,
    QB out there.

    I didnt much like Hill’s facial
    expressions, either, but then,
    I wasnt the one getting pounded
    play after play. The OLine was
    dominated. Hill was rattled.

    Cosell noted that Hill wasn’t
    really accurate against Washington either.
    The WR’s had to adjust to the ball in that game.
    In the Ariz game, Hill was just about 6 inches
    more inaccurate than in the Washington game,
    and it made a big difference.

    They need a Center and OG
    and a healthy Saffold
    to beat the Cards.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Stats. Rams worst D in the West ? #13792
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Rams numbers are inflated by some horrendous performances early in the season. Are the other defenses still better than the Rams? Perhaps, but the gap has closed significantly throughout the season and I tend to believe that the Rams’ defense is on a pretty good par with the 49ers right about now. The Seahawks and Cardinals are just a cut above right now. And maybe we’re looking at different charts, but NFL.com places the Cardinals at 14th in the league in yards allowed per game at 350, with the Rams 10th at 340. If you remove all of the turnovers that the Rams have committed that were returned for touchdowns (which is seven or eight, I believe), then their points allowed are much more comparable to the others as well.

    Well, i wonder if the Seattle/49er D’s
    are ‘philosophically’ similar
    and if the Arizona/Ram D’s are
    philosophically similar?

    Are the similarities and differences
    due to personnel differences or
    Defensive philosophy differences?

    Are Greg Williams Ds and the Arizona Ds
    always gonna trade Yards and big plays
    for the chance to get strip-sacks and INTs, etc ?
    High risk high reward defenses ?

    As opposed to Seattle and SF which maybe,
    possibly are more fundamentally sound
    defenses ? I dunno.

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 11,671 through 11,700 (of 12,559 total)