Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipantExcellent.
w
v
wvParticipant====================
VRENTAS: In 2013 you threw 27 touchdowns and two interceptions. Before you got hurt last season, you threw 13 touchdowns and 10 interceptions. Which of those quarterbacks is the real Nick Foles?FOLES: Both of them. Those are all me. I don’t want to turn the ball over. I want to throw touchdowns, and I want to help our offense move the ball and get the ball in the end zone. Every single rep I have ever taken, that’s always been the guy who I want to be. I am not going to sit here and tell you that 2013 is exactly [who I am as a quarterback]. I’ve grown since both of those years. I’m a better player, a better person, a better athlete. I know everybody is going to analyze [the different stat lines] until the cows come home. But I’m not worried about that. I just want to work here and be successful here
=====================Interesting answer.
w
v
wvParticipantMan, the NYGiants would have
O’dell Beckham AND Amari Cooper.The Jets would have Geno and Mariota.
Two high picks that may not be able
to play in the NFL 🙂I’d have a problem with that draft, myself.
I like the Scherf pick, and the RB
but I’d want another OLineman with the third
pick, not a CB.CB is a need, but OLine is a
Make-Or-Break-Need.w
vMarch 20, 2015 at 6:46 am in reply to: OL in free agency … Barksdale, Blalock, Wisniewski, etc. #21106
wvParticipant<span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>Rams should move on. Go with somebody on the roster or draft a center. He is not a difference maker. He is not that much better than what we have. I would rather save the cap space. I see no real value there.</span>
Sign him or dont sign him,
but DRAFT, two or three
young, healthy, giant, strong, stout HOGs.w
v
wvParticipantOn the Fisher lie. I wonder if Fisher thinks/feels
that JT broke a confidence at some point
or revealed something Fisher thot was gonna
be off the record — somethin like that.Cause for the life of me, i cant see
any other reason why Fisher would intentionally,
blatantly lie like that. I mean he
didnt have to. The only way it makes sense
to me is if it was personal/emotional.Who knows though. Not a big deal,
but definitely not classy
on Fisher’s part.w
v
wvParticipant==========
Luna Moth….…I’d read the facts—the one week lifespan,
The way, because they do not eat,The adults have no need of a mouth – by the time
I found the third, late last night,High on the wall of my kitchen.
I’d had too much to drink. I spoke to itAs if it were my own Buddhist teacher
Here to teach me nonattachment,The illusions of hunger, sex, rampant need.
I sat with it until the sun rose, toastingIts quick beauty, then the restfulness I found
In its body and then those bright-eyed,Translucent green wings that seemed
To breathe more and more slowly before goingMotionless. When I lifted it in my hand
I knew just how little the space wasBetween myself and nothingness.
Robert Cording
==============14th-Daili-Mothy-Ram
wvParticipantI take BPA at #10 regardless of position. Even if he’s DL.
Crazy talk. Thats just Richard-Parker
level madness.w
v
wvParticipantNice depth.
Still need a coupla Solid, Massive, Starters.
w
vYou appear to be unfamiliar with our pun approach to building O-lines.

You are probably right.
The Rams need to stick
with what they do best.
Building a good Oline
would only confuse the RBs,
QBs, and WRs.
Not to mention the playcaller.w
v—
wvParticipantNice depth.
Still need a coupla Solid, Massive, Starters.
w
v
wvParticipantSt. Louis Rams Sign OL Garrett Reynolds
by Patrick Karraker[archauthority.com]
http://archauthority.com/2015/03/18/st-louis-rams-sign-ol-garrett-reynolds/The St. Louis Rams finally made some sort of move to address their offensive line, which has been stripped bare by free agency and cap-conserving cuts, signing veteran offensive lineman Garrett Reynolds to a two-year contract worth $2.2 million. The 27-year-old Reynolds will become the seventh lineman who the Rams officially have in the fold for the 2015 season.
On a team that does not have many experienced depth options at the moment, Reynolds is a nice, versatile player to have around. After playing primarily right tackle during his college career at North Carolina, Reynolds played exclusively guard for the Atlanta Falcons from 2009 to 2013, starting in 23 games while appearing in 42 overall. After being released by the Falcons in February of last year, Reynolds signed with the Detroit Lions as training camp opened. He went on to start four games for them at right tackle while appearing in two more on a rotational basis.
Reynolds fits the profile of a typical long and lean Jeff Fisher offensive tackle, as he’s listed at 6-foot-7 but at times has been listed as tall as 6-foot-8, and he most recently weighed in at a svelte 310 pounds. In an ideal scenario, Reynolds probably serves as an experienced swing backup for starting tackles Greg Robinson and Joe Barksdale (who is still on the free agent market at the moment). The Rams didn’t have that type of player last year, as Robinson and Rodger Saffold, the team’s starting guards, were the primary backup tackles, with inexperienced Mike Person serving as the emergency option. (In addition, the Rams obviously made a misstep in allowing practice squad tackle Mike Remmers to escape to the Carolina Panthers midway through the season; Remmers went on to start the last five games of the regular season plus two playoff contests for Carolina.)
The reality is that Reynolds may also end up competing for the Rams’ other vacant guard position if no more established free agent options are brought into the fold. The team is expected to address the guard position in the middle rounds of the draft, but with an unproven rookie experiencing the grind of the NFL for the first time, guys like Reynolds and long-term project Brandon Washington will likely end up pushing for a starting spot.
wvParticipantYou suck, wv. Attention span of a moth.
The shame you must feel…“Be a Moth, Enter the Flame!”
RumiMarch 19, 2015 at 7:27 am in reply to: Jed York: 49ers got away from “core strengths” under Harbaugh #20990
wvParticipantI like this.
I’m an extremely flawed human being with lots of battle scars. And no matter how often I try to be someone else, I always end up despising that guy. He sucks and he’s boring.
Yay for Sarcastic Zooey.
I think its a big mistake
for Zooey to be himself.w
v
“Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else?”
— James Thurber
wvParticipant<span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>I agree with what you say. Aeneas said that he just needs to be smarter about when to be aggressive.</span>
Would he get his pick-6’s if he was
playing even with the WR
from the start, though?I dunno, about JJ. I dunno.
w
vMarch 18, 2015 at 3:44 pm in reply to: Big Board: Lack of sizzle doesn't mean this class lacks substance #20873
wvParticipantThat is indeed what the draft-watchers are ‘saying.’
Now how do you know its true? We wont have
any idea for two or three years, right?How do you know there wont be MORE
gems found in rounds 4, 5, and 6
THIS year than in the last few years?w
vI can look at a pile of beans and say this pile is bigger than that pile without counting them. If you need an actual count, I can’t satisfy you.</span>
Well, noting that this or that class has more “third year” players
doesnt really tell you if more players from that draft class
ended up as quality starters or quality role players. Yes?It just tells you that more third year boys entered the draft.
So, how would one go about researching which draft classes
were actually better than others? How would one do that?
And has anyone around here actually done it?
I would guess the answer is — no. 🙂March 18, 2015 at 3:38 pm in reply to: Big Board: Lack of sizzle doesn't mean this class lacks substance #20870
wvParticipantThe entire time I paid attention to the draft, if analysts say there is more highly-graded talent taken together om this one than in most drafts, I have never seen it turn out not to be true.
Yeah, but you haven’t actually ‘done the work’
== the research work — necessary to know
whether or not “it turned out to be true or not true.” == yes?
I mean who in the world HAS done that kind of research. Nobody,
except for maybe a handful of algebra-metrics nerds.I mean where is the actual EVIDENCE that this or that
broad-general-pre-draft-claims have held up?Most folks only ‘really’ know about a few draft-class
histories where a handful of QBs panned out.w
v-
This reply was modified 11 years, 1 month ago by
wv.
March 18, 2015 at 3:35 pm in reply to: Big Board: Lack of sizzle doesn't mean this class lacks substance #20869
wvParticipantyou drop the top 8 or 10 players from last years class and drop the players from rounds 5 and 6 of last years class you have sort of a picture of this year’s class. It is not terribly bad, but in no way is it close to last year and probably slightly down from an average draft class.
That is the general consensus of this years class. Remember Snead saying that this is why it was such a good deal to get Barron last year for a couple of this classes draft picks.
That is indeed what the draft-watchers are ‘saying.’
Now how do you know its true? We wont have
any idea for two or three years, right?How do you know there wont be MORE
gems found in rounds 4, 5, and 6
THIS year than in the last few years?w
v
wvParticipantI cheated and skipped down
immediately.
Just so you know.
I fit into the
“skipped down and cheated
immediately” category.w
vMarch 18, 2015 at 3:13 pm in reply to: Big Board: Lack of sizzle doesn't mean this class lacks substance #20862
wvParticipant<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>wv wrote:</div>
Can Snisher find some of them? Can
they find another EJ Gaines?I personally am not skeptical of those claims. In fact over the years they have held up. For example last year’s draft was said in advance to be one of the deepest in years. And sure enough that’s the draft they find a Gaines in round 6.
What evidence do you have that last years draft class
was “one of the deepest in years” ?It would take all kinds of research to
compare every year’s results to the “consensus claims”
about those years…And you have not done that research.
Ha.
I have run circles around you,
logically.w
v
wvParticipanttime for you to accept that and move Abandon this futile hope that JJ becomes a reliable and consistent corner because it’s not going to happen and I don’t want to see you get hurt.
LOL you are freaking hilarious…. And probably right.
Sucks though… All that God given ability…. Yet one blindspot ruins it all.
wvParticipantYeah, thats why it was so beneficial to Seattle
to find a gem like Wilson through the draft.
He was working for peanuts and it saved them
a ton of money they could spend in other places.Now, of curse that benefit is gone, but it
gave them three years of advantage.The Rams have one year now, where they
can play with the “cheap-QB-advantage.”
One year only. Then its back to
giving big bucks to the QB.Unless of course lightning strikes
and they draft a “russell wilson”
this year and he replaces Foles.Anyway, yeah, 19 million is the going
rate for a non-rookie-QB.w
vMarch 18, 2015 at 2:55 pm in reply to: Big Board: Lack of sizzle doesn't mean this class lacks substance #20854
wvParticipantI’m always pretty skeptical/wary/dismissive
of grand pronoucements about an entire draft-class,
before the class has actually played a coupla years.Ya know.
There will be plenty of stars sprinkled through
the first five rounds — as per usual.Can Snisher find some of them? Can
they find another EJ Gaines?
It sure looks like Seattle knows
how to find players in the later
rounds.The players are out there.
Every year.w
v-
This reply was modified 11 years, 1 month ago by
wv.
wvParticipantThe Rams hosted the Washington Redskins during an icy day on December 16, 1945 for the NFL championship in front of 32,178 fans.
…The Rams managed to win the 1945 NFL Championship Game 15–14.[6]
There’s a silent vid of the championship game, but
this one from 1944 is way better. Gotta say though,
without the ‘horns’ it just aint really the Rams.
As far as I’m concerned the “Rams” began
with the Horns. Whenever ‘that’ was. I forget.The commentary throughout this Vid
is priceless. Narrator is “Red Grange.”
THE Red Grange…? :“….except for Army and Navy no other college team could come within 4 Touchdowns
of these two teams…”
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 1 month ago by
wv.
wvParticipantIf top 5. However Jenkins alone could screw it up…
Well that will be a test of Coaching,
wont it. The JJ thing.
They will have had all offseason
and preseason to deal with the
“JJ problem.”w
v
wvParticipantWell, no new facts there. Just more opinions.
I think its still a fluid situation.
Wouldnt it be weird if the Rams won
the Super Bowl next year,
and…then left St.Louis.w
v
wvParticipantLook, I got no “answers” either. I just know that what we have is the product of a nation-wide culture. Change will have to come from changes to that culture. And football people have to be open to an evolution that involves meaningful changes to what EVERYONE–not just the refs–finds acceptable. Ultimately, it has to be based in a major change to the grassroots supporting the game.
Which is my point throughout this discussion.
The traditional football model is deeply threatened by the revelations concerning brain injuries. (So is rugby, btw.) And it is NOT just pros making 2.6 Million a year that are affected. It involves our children, our young men. In the thousands.
Are “we” open to a responsible movement to evolve a variant of the game that is safer?
Or aren’t “we”?
Well, i hear ya. But as you know full well, ‘football culture’ wasn’t built in a day,
and it was built in a broader context (capitalism, individualism, social-darwinism, etc, etc, etc)
and to ‘change’ any of that…well…aint easy. Again, I’m not tellin ya anything
you dont already know.I’d like to change all kinds of things about ‘Amerikan Culture’ but…i done give up. Sigh.
Btw, that frontline vid on the concussion issue is awfully damning
toward Goodell. Goodell handled the concussion issue almost exactly
like he later, would handle the Ray Rice issue — first he basically
tried to sweep it under the rug — and when there was a great backlash — THEN,
he got religion. So, that kinda tells us that until there is a ‘culture change’ and until
a great backlash against old-school-football-culture blossoms,
nothing will change. Now, who was it that said that already…? 🙂w
v
wvParticipantI appreciate your honesty, Man. But consider this:
<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Winnbrad wrote:</div>
But nothing will change unless the players force that change. As long as they’re willing to cash the checks and bash their brains in, people are gonna watch.See, I think this is backwards thinking. Checks will lead people to risk their lives. Indeed.
My point is the SOURCE of those checks! The checks arise from a massively consistent consensus in the football culture about what “we want.” Change the culture, and you change the source of the checks.
My question is this: are we willing to imagine a game that does less damage to brains?
It has to be far more than a few rules tweaks. They don’t work anyway. We have rules to “protect” QBs and they distort the game because they don’t change the fact that violent men armed with brutal weapons in the form of helmets are trying to stop the QBs. The rule can’t change that core reality.
The CULTURE has to change. That will change the source of the checks.
And it has to be done at a far more organic, core level than the play of the professionals in the league. Remember, tens of thousands of young men, many of them children, are affected by this. It’s not just NFL guys. Hell, I played a game mildly concussed once at Div. III level.
And that, really, is where change will have to happen. In a sense, I think it’s inevitable. There will be lawsuits involving Pee Wee leagues and school districts and gradually parents will demand change. Eventually, those changes at the grassroots level will change the game and people’s expectations.
Of course, all that will take time. A generation or more.
Which is American football’s existential threat. If changes aren’t made faster, there is a good chance that enough parents will sign their kids up for soccer or la crosse to undermine the football fan base. That actually seems to me to be a fairly likely scenario. I don’t think we’re all that far from a tipping point where we become a soccer nation. And parents of children will lead the way.
Well, the one suggestion you offered was a change in headgear.
And It might be interesting if the NFL tried some experiments
with that during the pre-season, but i have no idea whether
that would be safer. Maybe it would lead to some more deadly
or sudden-catastrophic types of injuries. I have no idea.But I’m all for a National conversation about all of this.
I got no answers.w
vMarch 17, 2015 at 11:23 am in reply to: Do you know what day this is? It is already half over! #20780
wvParticipantThanks Zooey, i enjoyed reading all that post.
I thought the Pi Movie was excellent myself.
Mainly because of the Visuals. The way they
showed the ocean and stars etc. I thought
it was moving.Interesting that he or his character
pokes at agnostics. I dont have any qualms
about agnosticism. Seems to me there’s no
avoiding ‘leaps’ no matter what you believe
or dont believe. Agnosticism to me is just
a leap that dont look like leap. But
what do i know.w
v
“faith without doubt is addiction”
— Salman Rushdie“Loss of faith is growth.”
Wallace Stevens“Why do we people in churches seem like cheerful, brainless tourists on a packaged tour of the Absolute?”
― Annie Dillard“She believed in nothing. Only her scepticism kept her from being an atheist.”
― Jean-Paul Sartre“….Thus, I live with a paradox that I cannot escape: my body is me, yet not me. As Richard Zaner says, ‘Compellingly mine, it is yet radically other: intimately alien, strangely mine. Most of all, my body is the embodiment of that most foreign of all things–death.’ Yearning to transcend our mortality, we yet recognize the body as bearer of mortality itself. Human beings are, as Ernest Becker has graphically said, ‘gods with anuses.’…. ”
James Nelson
wvParticipant@tmcdonaldjr: I understand this is a dangerous game but we know what we signed up for. Been playin all our life.. Don’t change up now #justball @nfl
Well, i think NOW, the players, for the most part know the risks,
cause the NFL is coming clean about it now —
but, in the olden days, i dont think the players knew
ALL the risks. I think they kinda had a general idea
but now they have more of a complete-picture.Will the players still play ? — sure. A lot of folks
would play the game for money and status they get. And maybe
some for the sheer joy of it, as well.Hang-gliding has risks, parachuting has risks, blah blah blah.
Life has risks.w
v
wvParticipantHow is Ramben, doing?
You think the Rams have
finally turned the corner?
Is Year Four, the playoff year?w
v -
This reply was modified 11 years, 1 month ago by
-
AuthorPosts

