Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 7,471 through 7,500 (of 12,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photowv
    Participant

    You think class and id-pol can both be talked about, and i think class needs more emphasis. Blah blah blah.

    As far as I am concerned, the “identity politics” phrase is empty. It doesn’t mean anything. It’s a catch phrase from those who reject certain (what are to me clear and obvious) truths.

    Namely this.

    You cannot separate class and race in discussing the USA and its politics. Not even by any “percentage.” Not even for “emphasis.” In the USA those 2 things cannot be separated. By any degree.

    To me, any effort to do so just distorts everything.

    Selecting one side of that and calling it “identity politics” does nothing for the discussion.

    And in fact the majority of Trump voters are decently well off.

    And, white.

    So the demographics do not support the “beleagured working class support Trump” idea. Especially since in the USA there IS such a thing as “white working class,” a lot of whom are pro-Trump (in fact that’s his real majority. You leave race out of it and the way I see it, you’re just chasing windmills).

    I never use the term “identity politics.” To me it is automatically dismissive.

    I say “race.”

    ————
    I agree that, that is how you see it 🙂
    We can both write each others posts on that topic.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Kissinger Treason #63110
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well but the MSN always thot Kissinger was sexy. You left that out.
    Try and be more balanced in the future.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Man, oh, man. As january 20 approaches, I just get sicker and sicker in my stomach. These cabinet appointments…Jesus Christ. And Pence and McConnell and Ryan. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.

    ————–
    Well, zooey we were totally screwed either way. As you know.

    I dont know if Trump will be worse than Hillary, because i dont know what effect the Trump presidency will have four years from now. I also dont agree with noam that every single policy of Trumps is worse than Hillarys. I mean its conceivable to me that Trumps trade deals will be better than Hillarys. I dunno.

    He’s a monster though. No doubt. And his cabinet and supreme court justices and fed judges are gonna be nightmarish.

    But maybe it will shock people into some kind of leftist-resistance. I think you agree that is our one ray of hope.

    …Speaking of Trump tweets andd trump talk…Someone today told me Trump supporters take him seriously, but dont take him literally. And anti-trumpers take him literally but not seriously.

    I dunno if that makes any sense but thats what i heard at the water cooler today.

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    And i wonder how much the CIA interfered in RUSSIAN politics
    over the last few decades? Where’s the stories on that?

    Should either one happen? Remember, some of us can’t be tarred with the “yeah well the USA does it too” brush. Some of us have been complaining about THAT all along, too.

    And, of course, how exactly would the USA intervene in a Russian “fair election”? Who is the Russian Barry Sanders? Maybe the USA backed HIM.

    Though one thing has happened. We’ve gone from the “there was no Russian election intervention” story to “well okay but what difference does it make” (which is Trump’s reaction, after initially denying it was real.)

    ———–
    Um…no. I have never ever said there was no russian influence. I have said what Chomsky has said: “enh”. That is way different from denying the russian hacking.

    My own emphasis is on the hypocrisy of all the MSN sites howling over the russian hacking. Their howling is selective and it distracts people from all the shit this government has done to other nations.
    So, my thing is, dont complain about the rooskies if you are also not going to complain about the CIA. (I know u complain about both).

    Which is the more important story — what the rooskies did or how the US has interfered in countless elections all over the globe? Which story is going to get played up in the US and which story is going to get suppressed or ignored?

    So which story ‘needs’ more energy devoted to it?
    And which story doesnt.

    For me this is similar to the class vs id-politix thing. You think class and id-pol can both be talked about, and i think class needs more emphasis. Blah blah blah.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Reasons why Americans are poor #63093
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I would ‘guess’ that many rightwingers would have a different list of reasons. I would ‘guess’ many rightwingers would say people are poor because they are ‘lazy’ and feel ‘entitled’ etc.

    And thats part of the big core-divide between the left and right, i guess.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    American intel has already made clear that among many other things the russians did, yes they hacked the dems (and the republicans too they just didn’t release that info).

    They did do the hacking. That’s not all they did.

    And this topic has nothing to do with who won the election. It has to do with whether it’s true there was russian involvement in the election in various ways.

    And. Yes, there was.

    ON TOP OF IT, this is not about dems whining. It goes way beyond that. Anyone who tries to construe it as JUST dems whining is just not engaging with the entire issue and all the info we have.

    I see this discussion as Jane Democracy’s corpse is found and this discussion is focused on the small cuts and abrasions on her back.Are they from glass beer bottle glass? whiskey bottle glass ,what store was the glass bought at? Meanwhile there’s a massive hole where her heat used to be , a large and very bloody butcher knife with noticeably stumpy fingerprints on it lays at her side and a trail of bloody footprints leading to a limo headed for an inauguration.

    ——————-

    Well, I’m in a similar camp. The “russian hacking” story seems like a minor issue to me, given what the corporotacracy (and the CIA/NSA in particular) is and has been doing to the biosphere over the last fifty years.

    Others have a different view, i know.

    I wonder how the powers-that-be will try and counter
    all this ‘hacking’ in the future, btw?

    And i wonder how much the CIA interfered in RUSSIAN politics
    over the last few decades? Where’s the stories on that? 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: Did the Rams quit on Fisher/Fassel ? #63058
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    According to WikiLeaks, the Russians
    were behind the Fisher extension leak.
    Or maybe it was the Patriots. Or the Joker. I forget.

    The main point is,
    this is one sorry ass team.

    And i think it needs a big rebuild.

    It will be very interesting to see how many of these
    rams are still on the team in two years.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Obamacare repeal might have died tonight #63046
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I assume the way the Repugnants will play is something like this — they will scream and yell and diss ObamaCare to their Core/Base voters. And they will talk about fighting the good fight for freedom from big-government, etc. And they will allow the Dems to derail their ‘effort’ to Repeal ObamaCare.

    That way they can pretend to fight for something ‘better’ and they can blame the Democrats for blocking their efforts.

    Simple.

    They are not stupid.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Tweet: Silver – many candidates very high on Goff #63007
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Are they high on Gurley, i wonder?

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    but i also agree that trump for some bizarre reason is able to tap into that anger even though he too is part of that elite class. i don’t know why people don’t see that. it baffles me

    —————-
    Well its not new. How many Duplicats or Replicants can you name that were NOT part of the multi-millionaire-class ? John Kerry? Clinton? Bush? Trump? Gore? ..just go down the list.

    Americans have been trained that they only have two choices. The Dem-elite or the Rep-Elite. Trump was just one more in a long line. Sure he had billions instead of Hillary’s hundred million, but still…

    Why do Americans vote Dem or Rep every single time? Cause they’ve been trained by the system to do that. In all the ways weve discussed for ten years.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Did the Rams quit on Fisher/Fassel ? #62993
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well we know some players didnt quit. Like the Oline.

    I mean to ‘quit’ you have to actually begin to play in the first place.

    …i keep thinkin of that Chris Long vid. The one where he was asked to compare his experiences with the Rams and Pats, and he said he wouldn’t compare them — but then he emphasized the “Pats players are unselfish“.

    One could reasonably conclude he was making a point there.

    w
    v

    in reply to: on mod actions #62989
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    …However that is not the case here since this has been an ongoing thing with only him. Even when I’m conversing with another mod.

    ————–

    bnw, i know you think you are right, and zn is wrong.
    So youve said it. You’ve had your say. Expressed your truth.
    Now, its time to let it go.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Did the Rams quit on Fisher/Fassel ? #62962
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    i don’t know about quitting. i will say that it is my opinion that fisher lost the team. whether that means they stopped believing in the system. or they lost confidence. or they turned on the coach. i have no clue.

    but i do believe the coaching staff lost the players.

    ————–
    Well, i dunno if they did or not, but it sure as hell would not surprise me.
    I mean, would ‘you’ have kept the faith that long?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Did the Rams quit on Fisher/Fassel ? #62956
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think a lot of us noticed that there were three or four games in a row (Atlanta, Saints, Pats..) where the Rams were gonna go up against powerful Offensive Teams. Seems like the Rams were ‘breaking’ right about the same time they had to play some powerful offenses — and they just shattered at that point.

    w
    v

    in reply to: leftists are not fun #62952
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    PS — oh, and zn, around the 26 minute mark or so, he talks about the ‘uncanny’ and dread, and ghost-story stuff. Fwiw

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <
    It does seem to work. But it’s amazing they view Trump as on their side: a purported billionaire who ships all of his manufacturing overseas, goes to war with his employees and unions, constantly, and brags about stiffing small businesses…

    ————–
    Yup. That part i agree with. It is ‘amazing’.

    How did American voters become so easily mislead? Well, weve discussed the system and corporate-propaganda a gazillion times.

    What’s even more amazing to ‘me’ was the popularity of Bernie. THAT one came out of left-field. I just assumed the capitalist-corporate-machine had done its work so well, that from now till the End, the voters would blindly vote for either a Neoliberal-crush-the-poor candidate, or a Rightwing-biosphere-destroyer — but then there was all that support for Bernie. How did THAT happen? And is there any hope at all it can lead to anything ?

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    My point is that responding in a petulant tone to criticism is beneath the dignity of the office. Or has been until now. Maybe Trump redefines that.

    But Bush – who got blasted from the same pulpit many times – never responded.

    ————-
    Well I dunno Zooey. Obama can send drones out into the world and blow up
    nameless brown-people. He can support hideous trade policies that crush the poor….etc…same as Bush, Clinton… — So, i just dont think about the ‘dignity of the office’ anymore.

    I dont think there’s anything about this corporotacracy that has any dignity.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    In any event, here is the President of the United States getting into a pissing contest with an actor. An actor. What kind of guy does that?

    ==============
    Well, maybe a really shrewd rightwinger. Cause counter-attacking Rich Hollywood Liberals plays very well on the right. It always has, as far as i can remember.

    I mean look at the people in that room with Streep — would you guess most working class voters identify with the folks in that room?

    w
    v

    in reply to: on mod actions #62894
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    A book thread? Thats what this has morphed into?

    …ok, I’m reading an old fantasy escape book – Perdido Street Station,
    by China Mieville.

    link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaaFun09At0

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Why all the outrage about this one case involving Russia? Cause Russia went after the Neoliberals?

    No.

    No that is not it.

    Usually you’re good at listening. You have something blocking you in this case, and I can’t think of what it is. It’s causing you to not hear the other side on this. So you’re not even really responding to the real arguments.

    For one thing they went after HALF of the neo-liberals. Look at Trump’s actual policies. The idea that he is free of neo-liberalism is just wrong. They are classical neo-liberal policies. It’s just that his administration will be the neoliberals who also go after social security, medicaire, planned parenthood, roe v. wade, the supreme court, the EPA, and so on. In other words, they’re the WORSE neo-liberals. But they are not NOT neo-liberals.

    And if you can countenance this, you have no reason to complain about american intervention in other nation’s elections. Either that’s a principle—you don’t do that–or it’s no argument at all. You can’t suddenly countenance it because in this case you have animosity toward the target.

    ….

    ————
    Well to me, you are the one thats blocked and not hearing. So again we disagree. To me, you are “quibbling”. Yes, they went after “half” the neoliberals. Fine. Thats worth an “enh” to me.

    Someone asked Chomsky about the Russian issue and he basically went “enh, yeah they were probly doing stuff”

    They went after half the system and supported the Trump-half of the system.

    Enh.

    The Russian-powers-that-be are Gangsters. The US powers-that-be are gangsters. They all spy and hack and screw the poor and weak.
    I cant work up any outrage about what the Russian-gangsters did to the Dem-Gangsters. To me it’d be like focusing on how bad Al Capone treated Lucky Luciano.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well again my own view is:
    1 heck yeah the Rooskies probably did a lot of shit
    because they preferred Trump (because Hillary was warmongering against them)

    2 Other political organizations/nations have also done exactly the same thing.
    We live in a world of hacking and spying and lying. Why all the outrage about this one case involving Russia? Cause Russia went after the Neoliberals?

    3 wikileaks is a separate subject and no-one has proven any connection between Wikileaks and Russia. Also as far as i know, no-one has ‘ever’ in the history of wikileaks shown that ANY of their info has been WRONG. I like wikileaks, and i like that they give the public accurate info. If its ‘selective’ its selective.
    Thats something to think about and consider and factor in — while we are perusing their ACCURATE info.

    4 And of course a related issue is — The Powers-that-are-complaining are responsible for all kinds of hacking and spying etc.
    Juan Cole on NSA Hacking:http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/those_times_the_nsa_hacked_americas_allies_20170107

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Russian Hacking evidence #62862
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i dont know what ‘Russia’ did or didn’t do,
    but i do know the Hillary/Podesta wikileaks emails were true and accurate.

    So assuming for the sake of argument that russia or some other group leaked,
    true and accurate info to the American Public….how is that such a bad thing?

    w
    v

    If you do that selectively you have an agenda. I mean it really is that simple.

    If they had leaked republican stuff TOO, I could see your point.

    But they did it selectively, so it is absolute inescapable that they had an agenda. (BTW the Russians DID access republican material. They just chose not to release it.)

    And btw on to another point … I am both against the USA interfering in elections abroad and foreign powers interfering in american elections. One doesnt justify the other. To me if you’re against one you should be against the other. And that’s regardless whether or not we personally like or dislike the target.

    ————–
    The ‘russians’ may have accessed Rep stuff, but that doesn’t mean wikileaks had an agenda. We dont know where wikileaks got its info from.

    Moreover, i dont care if wikileaks had an ‘agenda’. What if they ‘did’ prefer Trump over Hillary? Its not a crime. Its just an agenda. And since they only told the truth about Hillary, it doesn’t seem out of line to me. I mean telling the truth while having an agenda is not the worst thing in the world.

    w
    v

    Wikileaks CLEARLY had an agenda. I don’t even think that’s debatable.

    I don’t care if it’s a crime—it’s manipulation of another nation’s election. I condemned that when the USA did it and I don’t like it much now either.

    And btw Russian actions did not reduce to giving dem stuff to wikileaks. It was more than that.

    And wikileaks is not “telling the truth.” They used selective information to manipulate a process. If they were interested in the truth they would have asked the russians for the republican stuff too. To me that’s no different from someone who witnesses an altercation with the police and then only states what the defendant did without saying what the police did. Protecting a bad cop is not devotion to truth.

    .

    ————-
    Well, I dont see it that way. We will have to agree to disagree.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Russian Hacking evidence #62860
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i dont know what ‘Russia’ did or didn’t do,
    but i do know the Hillary/Podesta wikileaks emails were true and accurate.

    So assuming for the sake of argument that russia or some other group leaked,
    true and accurate info to the American Public….how is that such a bad thing?

    w
    v

    If you do that selectively you have an agenda. I mean it really is that simple.

    If they had leaked republican stuff TOO, I could see your point.

    But they did it selectively, so it is absolute inescapable that they had an agenda. (BTW the Russians DID access republican material. They just chose not to release it.)

    And btw on to another point … I am both against the USA interfering in elections abroad and foreign powers interfering in american elections. One doesnt justify the other. To me if you’re against one you should be against the other. And that’s regardless whether or not we personally like or dislike the target.

    ————–
    The ‘russians’ may have accessed Rep stuff, but that doesn’t mean wikileaks had an agenda. We dont know where wikileaks got its info from.

    Moreover, i dont care if wikileaks had an ‘agenda’. What if they ‘did’ prefer Trump over Hillary? Its not a crime. Its just an agenda. And since they only told the truth about Hillary, it doesn’t seem out of line to me. I mean telling the truth while having an agenda is not the worst thing in the world.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Russian Hacking evidence #62849
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i dont know what ‘Russia’ did or didn’t do,
    but i do know the Hillary/Podesta wikileaks emails were true and accurate.

    So assuming for the sake of argument that russia or some other group leaked,
    true and accurate info to the American Public….how is that such a bad thing?

    At any rate Trump, Hillary, Obama, Bush, and the Senate and the House and the S.Court and the CIA and the NSA and the Pentagon and all the rest of “it” are so completely, utterly corrupt and hideous at this point, I cant get worked up about ‘hacking’ or counter-hacking or whatever weasely-shit might be going on.

    The system isn’t “broken” — the system is working efficiently — and its a biosphere killer.

    w
    v

    in reply to: X mas present #62839
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    awesome

    w
    v

    in reply to: informal poll — how do you feel about losing G. Wms #62838
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dunno.

    I cant decide.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Demoff: 'This is not a rebuild' #62395
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Who are these ‘talented’ players? Just curious. How many “excellent” players do they have?

    Aaron Donald.

    Donald is a superlative player, on an entirely different level than most.

    How many of them are there in the LEAGUE? Let alone on the Rams. That’s like saying where’s your Eric Dickerson? Well you have no running back talent then.

    I think Demoff’s right. They have a stock of decent to good to very good talent there. If Goff solidifies they can win with what they have, at least up to the wild card level. I think people are mistaking a lot of bad things for lack of talent.

    ————–
    Well, I asked a question — How many ‘excellent’ players are there on the Rams.

    So who else qualifies as excellent or better ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Chris Long compares Rams career with Patriots' season #62390
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “I’m not making comparisons…but in New England there are a ton of selfless players…”

    w
    v

    in reply to: Demoff: 'This is not a rebuild' #62379
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Demoff should f*** off.

    ————-

    He’s a weasel all right.

    But do they need to ‘rebuild’ and what exactly is the definition of ‘rebuild’?

    I dunno.

    Who are these ‘talented’ players? Just curious. How many “excellent” players do they have?

    Aaron Donald.

    Who else
    ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Washington interested in Kenny Britt #62377
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well all i can say is the Rams need an UPGRADE at WR. As they have for a million years now. They….need…an…upgrade.

    I dont care whether Britt stays or goes — they need an upgrade.

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 7,471 through 7,500 (of 12,326 total)