Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 3,481 through 3,510 (of 3,511 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Has the light turned on for Quick?/PD #4377
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    If Quick and Britt come through it will be SO huge for the Rams.

    I’m all aflutter with anticipation.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by nittany ram.
    in reply to: Manziel's struggles #4375
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    His lack of maturity may be the biggest hindrance to him becoming a good QB.

    Yeah, he can’t read defenses worth a lick but many college QB’s come into the league with that problem. There are a lot of gimmicky offenses used in college these days in which reading defenses isn’t a priority. That can be learned. It’s just a matter of studying film, taking instruction from coaches and practice.

    But maturity is different. Seems like most of the players that lack it coming into the league never get it.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by nittany ram.
    in reply to: Worst movie I've seen in many a moon… #4242
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    No that’s cool. I’m glad you did and thanks for the info.

    in reply to: Get ready for the Legion of Boom rule #4095
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    max

    It appears that the only recourse a defense has now is not to let the QB make accurate throws by either getting tremendous pressure or knocking him out of the game somehow. I wonder how that will affect defenses that have better secondaries than DLs. You’d think they will have a harder time.

    There could be an unintended and unwanted consequence of this rule change. If getting pressure on the QB becomes even more important then you will see more blitzing which will result in QB’s getting hit more which could lead to more QB injuries.

    in reply to: Legatron #3685
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    nittany ram wrote:

    When the game’s on the line, he’s not that reliable.

    Jake Long, Wells, Brockers, Laurinaitis, Jenkins, and Bradford were all out.

    How do you expect JZ to hit them all without a decent supporting cast?

    Do you even follow football?

    Great kickers elevate the players around them. Even the most casual observer of football knows that.

    in reply to: Guardians of the Galaxy #3275
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    But! Earlier in the same monologue, Quill tells Drax that Gamorra’s violence didn’t bother him, and lists the women who have assaulted him. He points to one scar and says “see that? I got that from a smoking hot Rayjack girl who stabbed me with a fork.”

    Hmm, very observant of you. Perhaps Drax just took what he said at face value and therefore thought that Quill was stabbed by a woman whose temperature was so high she was smoking.

    in reply to: Guardians of the Galaxy #3073
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    My wife and I saw it too. We both really liked it. I would say it is among the best marvel films I’ve seen. For me, Avengers is still tops but I would rank GotG just beneath it.

    in reply to: Worst movie I've seen in many a moon… #2803
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Oh yeah, well the Q were transcendent beings and they retained humanoid emotions and failings…

    1

    Lucy became sorta like a Q. Like a humorless, expressionless Q traveling through time and space…

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by zn.
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    ”I think we have a great chance to be really good.”

    See, this is why Bradford isn’t a true leader.

    A true leader would’ve said, “I think we have a good chance to be really great.”

    See the difference there?

    Yeah, it’s subtle perhaps but it’s the difference between being George Patton and Dick Van Patton.

    in reply to: Worst movie I've seen in many a moon… #2770
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Yeah I saw the “%10 of the brain” thing in the trailer and just went…enh. Didn’t see it.

    If what you say is true, and I don’t doubt it, that’s a lotta wasted talent. Besson, Johansson…

    .

    Johansson wasn’t good but it wasn’t really her fault. Her part was the same ol’ hackneyed role you often see in sci-fi movies such as this. As she gained access to more and more of her brain she became more automaton-like. Her character loses her depth and humanity. Much of her role involved staring blankly and speaking in a flat, emotionless tone. I find it boring that sci-fi movies always depict beings with higher intelligence as being Vulcan-like. It’s like they assume a sense of joy or wonder or sadness could not coexist in a super-smart being.

    Spoiler alert….

    In the end she merges with a computer and so she exists in the world wide web. Her body is gone and another character asks where she went. He immediately receives a text that says…”I am everywhere.”

    So, that makes her what, about the 50th character in a sci-fi film to merge with the global network of computers? It must be getting crowded in there.

    in reply to: Ray Rice – 2 games #2611
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    well. police supposedly have footage of rice knocking her unconscious. that wasn’t released to the public.

    i was also angry at how harbaugh responded to this whole thing.

    “It’s not a big deal, it’s just part of the process,” Harbaugh said, via ESPN. “There are consequences when you make a mistake like that. I stand behind Ray. He’s a heck of a guy. He’s done everything right since. He makes a mistake, alright? He’s going to have to pay a consequence. I think that’s good for kids to understand it works that way. That’s how it works, that’s how it should be.”

    maybe it should be a big deal. maybe i don’t know all the facts.

    just not acceptable to me that it was a 2 game suspension. i realize people make mistakes. but in this case. i gotta agree with wv. guys are getting hammered for smoking pot and then this guy gets away with a 2 game suspension?

    Yeah, I agree that Goodell’s response to a player knocking a woman unconscious is ridiculous and Harbaugh calling the actions of his prize thug a “mistake” would be laughable if it wasn’t so reprehensible.

    in reply to: Worst movie I've seen in many a moon… #2609
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    It was bad, PA. Really bad. And I often go out of my way to give movies the benefit of the doubt but I think I might have suffered some form of PTSD after seeing this. I don’t know when or even if I’ll be able to take a chance on another film.

    Heck, I screamed like a little girl in a snake pit when I accidentally bumped into a bin full of 5 dollar DVD’s at Rite Aide today.

    in reply to: Predict Rams Record #2342
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    10-6 plus wildcard game victory.

    in reply to: WV, why do you have a Raven as your profile picture? #2189
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Are they actual ravens – or are they crows? There’s a difference, you know…

    http://www.differencebetween.net/science/nature/difference-between-crow-and-raven/

    null

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by nittany ram.
    in reply to: Dungy would not have selected M.Sam #2166
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    When the Rams took Sam that was one of my proudest moments as a fan. I’m glad Fisher and Snead understand there are bigger issues at play here than possible lockerroom problems. On the other hand, if Fisher really suspected that drafting Sam would lead to widespread dissention in the lockerroom, he probably wouldn’t have drafted him. The fact that he did means he must trust that his players would be fine with it. Says a lot about the quality of the people he drafts.

    in reply to: Watkins vs G.Robinson #2097
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    When I saw the title of your post, “Watkins vs Robinson” I thought you going to try to compare Rok Watkins to Greg Robinson for some reason…as if the two were comparable.

    I was all set to trample your post into the muck like a herd of stampeding tapirs.

    But I see I was mistaken. You were actually talking about Sammy Watkins, not Rok Watkins.

    So now I look like the fool.

    Well played.

    I guess you think you’re pretty smart with your fancy Morgantown education, dontcha’ Mr. Sassypants.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by nittany ram.
    in reply to: Former Seahawk Michael Robinson talks about the Rams #1862
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    well i think eli looked soft at the beginning of his career. his own teammate barber criticized him early on.

    hopefully bradford answers his critics this year.

    Yeah, Bradford’s body language and on-field demeanor have been criticized since day 1.

    Is there anything to it? Does it mean anything? I dunno…

    But the surest way to make everyone forget about all that is to play well consistently over the course of the season. Of course to do that he has to stay healthy as well. If he does that then the speculation about him being soft goes away.

    nittany ram
    Moderator

    I think I remember the game you’re thinking of but Dickerson’s first regukar season game was against the Giants. He had a pretty average day statistically – 31 carries for 91 yds, long of 24 yds, no TDs.

    in reply to: IF u want to see Miami, go soon #1659
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Disney would simply re-market itself as the world’s largest water park and make another 30 gazillion dollars.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by nittany ram.
    in reply to: IF u want to see Miami, go soon #1648
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    I think Sunlife Stadium being under water could give the Dolphins an unfair homefield advantage. Hopefully the league has already thought of that and has a contingency.

    in reply to: do running/mobile qbs get sacked more as a rule #1568
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    I’d be interested in seeing a comparison of “games missed per season due to injury” between running QBs and pocket QBs.

    And that sounds like a lot of work so you better get started now.

    Chop chop.

    in reply to: Russ Lande: Rams gamble on Bradford #1563
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Well, I don’t consider Bradford a gamble at all. I think this season will finally put an end to the media’s ‘wondering’ about the abilities of Sam Bradford.

    in reply to: Breakout player–Defense? #1466
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    I think under Williams, Jenks’ considerable talent will finally be utilized and he’ll have a big year. I also agree with Jack and think Tru-Jo could have a big year as well.

    in reply to: Old TV series that were interesting… #1362
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    I have a book called “The Pinball Effect” written by James Burke, the host of “Connections 2”. It’s very much like the TV show.

    in reply to: Optimism? #1227
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    The original question was, if given 9 wins right now, would we settle for it? It’s not that I wouldn’t be happy with 9 wins given the strength of their division and schedule and maybe hoping for more than that is unrealistic all things considered. It’s just that I think there is a possibility they could do better.

    Afterall, the 9’ers and Seahawks could suffer major injuries…maybe even along the magnitude we are used to seeing all too frequently. In that case, the Rams should certainly be able to do better than 9 victories.

    Either way I wouldn’t want to set limits on what they can achieve. In July of 99, how many folks would have settled for 9 victories if it had been offered?

    in reply to: "If you could pencil in 9 wins" would you take it? #1076
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Nah, they can do better than 9. I’m not saying they will, but they can. I don’t think 9 wins would get them into the playoffs anyway. I’m not even sure 9 wins keeps them out of last place so why settle for an improved but still sorta mediocre record when there is a chance for much more?

    in reply to: 1979 LA Rams #690
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    That season saw the emergence of Wendell Tyler and Vinnie Ferragamo. For me, the Superbowl loss didn’t sting so bad because the Rams’ future looked so bright. I figured there would be plenty more Superbowls to come….

    in reply to: The PFT crew discusses Bradford #688
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Well, first of all “8” isn’t a prime number and if they can’t even get that simple concept correct how can we take anything else they have to say seriously? 😉

    Seriously though, nothing was said about Bradford that was incorrect per se, except when the host said something about Bradford ‘regressing since his rookie year’, which only means the host is merely a talking head and doesn’t actually pay attention.

    Florio noted Sam was playing really well up until his injury. However, he brought up that unsupportable hypothesis that the Rams probably would have traded Sam if they could hvae gotten something for him. It’s just that no one was willing to make a trade for an expensive QB coming off an ACL injury…

    People keep saying this, despite no evidence supporting it. In fact, Snead and Fisher have stated countless times that Bradford was “their” QB. Fisher even says he came to the Rams BECAUSE of Sam Bradford. Now I’m not saying there is no possible scenario in which the Rams would have traded Bradford, I’m just tired of people speculating that the Rams wanted to trade Bradford without any proof.

    in reply to: how will Bradford rate? #605
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Yeah, Bradford will land somewhere in that 6 – 12 category. I doubt he’ll ever be more than that. He’ll never be elite in the sense that Manning or Brady are elite but he could fall just beneath that level. I think he could be better than everyone in that second level exept perhaps Rothlesberger.

    nittany ram
    Moderator

    The Rams are obviously improved and have gained ground on the rest of the NFC West but it will still be a tough challenge to finish above 4th place. However, I think all 4 NFC West teams will rank among the top 12 – 15 teams in the NFL.

Viewing 30 posts - 3,481 through 3,510 (of 3,511 total)