Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 3,511 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: our reactions to the Giants game #148111
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    As zn often says, the Rams are terrible at tanking.

    I would say they improved mightily in that regard, albeit not quite enough to pull it off today.

    But it wasn’t for a lack of trying, that’s for sure.

    in reply to: setting up the 12/31 Giants game #148074
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    The most memorable Rams/Giants game…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rttr5-1CUpA

    in reply to: around the league week 17 #147962
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Ravens play a “matchup zone” which is different than most teams. No one does it better and the @49ers were the latest to find out. #BaldysBreakdowns

    “Yeah, <yawn> that ‘match-up zone’ is a real bastard.”

    – QB Matthew Stafford, who recently went 23 of 41 for 294 yds, 3 TDs, 0 INTs against it.

    in reply to: Rams defensive stats last 5 games #147931
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Turnovers per game: 0.8. Would rank 31st. Sacks per game: 2.2. Would rank 27th

     

    That won’t get fixed this season, and that’s what will keep them from realizing their full potential.

    If only there was time to complete a Dale Carnegie course before the playoffs, but that takes 8 weeks.

    Damn it all.

    in reply to: setting up the 12/31 Giants game #147874
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Josh Gerben@JoshGerben
    New York Giants quarterback Tommy DeVito has filed new trademarks for:

    1. TOMMY CUTLETS
    2. PASSING PAISANO

    The filings claim that DeVito plans to sell branded:

    Decals
    Clothing
    Pasta
    Pizza
    Tomato sauces
    Energy Drinks

    Devito understands that his brand has a short shelf-life and so is going to make as much as he can while it lasts.

    in reply to: Setting up the Saints game #147717
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Rams lead all-time series 43-35. I was surprised the margin isn’t wider. The Rams owned the Saints for a couple of decades, winning 14 of the first 17 matchups. Since 1977, the Saints have the upper hand. Fun fact: tonight’s game is the only one that matters right now.

    The Rams used to own a lot of teams.

    Then the 90s came…

    in reply to: Setting up the Saints game #147656
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    McVay has already said that Havenstein, Tutu, and Witherspoon will play against the Saints.

    He didn’t say anything to me about it.

    Apparently you’re not part of McVay’s ‘circle of trust’ like some of us.

    in reply to: Setting up the Saints game #147645
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    This isn’t great.

    What a surprise, Noteboom is hurt.

    McVay has already said that Havenstein, Tutu, and Witherspoon will play against the Saints.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Washington game #147632
    nittany ram
    Moderator

     Agree with all that. 100 percent In some ways Williams is the most interesting/fun RB to watch/analyze in a long time. Im not sure i can remember a rb quite like him. w v

    In that chat room I predicted that you would no longer like Williams after his second fumble.

    You’re getting soft.

     

     

    in reply to: Wild Card race #147626
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    How horrible will it be if it’s a Dallas/SF game for the championship?

    If that happens, then for one 3.5 hour period, I will be the biggest Dallas fan that ever lived.  How bout’ dem’ Cowboys…

    in reply to: our reactions to the Washington game #147597
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    The offense looked great with the exception of a couple drive-ending fumbles by Williams and a bad drop by Nacua. I thought the defense looked a little tired in the second half, but the Rams got the W and are in the driver seat for the playoffs.

    in reply to: Wild Card race #147587
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Vikings, Packers, and Falcons all lost.

    The table’s set for the Rams.

    Why does that make me nervous?

    in reply to: setting up the Washington game #147570
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    The Rams should put up over 30 points, and the Redskins shouldn’t score over 20. But, you know, football.

    I don’t know, man. What is the Rams historical record against teams named after a military rank?

    Tone deaf choice of replacement names from Washington ownership. Someone in that organization must have read Margaret Atwood’s Handmaid’s Tale, or have seen the Hulu adaptation. Rams 30 Gilead 17

    The name that was bandied about that I liked best was ‘Red Tails’ – the name of a squadron of P51 Mustangs flown by the Tuskegee airmen.

    in reply to: around the league week 15 #147561
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    The Steelers are the worst team still in playoff contention this late in the season in the history of Creation.

    Can’t believe the Rams lost to them.

    in reply to: setting up the Washington game #147503
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    there shouldn’t be a letdown. i just don’t see it.

    I hope not.   I wonder if a letdown is more likely after a hard-fought, emotional loss, or a hard-fought, emotional victory?

    in reply to: reactions to the Ravens game #147476
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Lions in the NFC and Browns in the AFC iz what I’m pullin for. w v

    Well, most Rams fans are hoping the RAMS are in the Super Bowl, but you do you.

    in reply to: Rams chances for the playoffs #147473
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Go New York Tackle Football Giants… they need to beat the Packers tonight.

    And they did. The Giants did beat the Packers, 24-22. …

    Green Bay Packers vs. New York Giants | 2023 Week 14 Game Highlights

     

    The good news is, the Giants beat the Packers.

    The bad news is, they no longer look like an easy out.

    The Rams face the Giants in 3 weeks.

    I guess the football gods just aren’t going to hand the Rams a playoff spot.  They’ll have to work for it.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 12/11 #147454
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    McVay opted not to bring back John Fassel following the 2019 season

    Is this accurate? I thought Fassel just took a better offer elsewhere. I do recall some conversation about McVay early on, though, something about getting all the coaches/staff on the same page in terms of culture, but I don’t trust my memory of any of that.

    It’s accurate.  The speculation was that it was because Fassel was a Fisher hire and McVay wanted his own coach in there, plus  McVay soured on Fassel after he called for an unsanctioned fake punt from inside the Rams own 30 that failed. It was the final game of the season against the Cards. The Rams went on to win the game but the cameras caught how livid McVay was on the sidelines.

    in reply to: twitter, reporters, big articles, etc… Ravens game #147412
    nittany ram
    Moderator

     This season the Rams were scheduled four teams coming off of their bye week. That was tied for the league lead. Results so far… @ DAL: Lost 43-20 vs. PIT: Lost 24-17 @ BAL: Lost 37-31 …the Rams play Washington off of their bye week

    The Rams open as 6.5 pt favorites against Washington.  Historically, this game represents exactly the sort of trap the Rams would blunder into coming off an emotional, hard-fought game against a great opponent.  Remember losing to horrid Jets and Dolphins teams after big victories in recent past?

    The Commanders’ QB is pretty good too.

    in reply to: Rams chances for the playoffs #147395
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    I feel if we win our last 5 games, making the playoffs, would be great, but not a guarantee we make the playoffs. But, it will give us a chance. Winning 4 out of our last 5, we will need help, to make it into the playoffs. I’m going off, on what I see.

    There’s only 4 games left, Jack.

    The Rams are battling the Seahawks and the Vikings for the final spot.  If the Rams can win 3 out of their final 4 games I think they’ll be in.  Since 3 of those games are against Wash, NO, and NYG, I think that’s doable.  That will get them to 9-8.

    The Vikings (7-6) remaining games are against Cin, GB, and Det twice.  They’ll likely lose all of those, but even if they manage to win one their record would be 8-9.

    The Seahawks (6-7) have games against Phil, Tenn, Pitt, and Ariz.  They’ll most likely lose to Phil, so even if they win the other 3 games the best their record can be is 9-8.  If the Rams and Seahawks both finish 9-8 the Rams get the wildcard based on head to head.

    So, the playoffs are very doable for the Rams.  They just need to win the games they should win.

     

     

    in reply to: Rams chances for the playoffs #147390
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    The one time in my life that I want the 9ers to win a game and they’re letting the Seahawks hang around.

    21-16 in the 3rd qtr.

     

    in reply to: reactions to the Ravens game #147382
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Blatant block in the back missed by the officials on the punt return.  It’s the buzz of Rams Nation right now.

    Oh well.  The Rams had their chances. Some odd game-clock issues at the end of the game and in overtime, but overall incredibly happy with how they played. Still, losing that game given the effort is a bitter pill.

    in reply to: signing another kicker #147368
    nittany ram
    Moderator
    Rams Brothers@RamsBrothers
    Yesterday: we probably aren’t going to elevate Mason Crosby to the active roster for Sunday
    Today: Rams elevate Mason Crosby to the active roster for Sunday

    Shitty-weather game. Maybe that’s why they are rushing Crosby into the fray – given that he spent his career kicking in Green Bay.

    Also shows they have absolutely NO faith in that Have-to-risk-it guy.

     

     

    in reply to: Rams’ Biggest Need #147366
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    That’s what happens when you tell an AI app to write an article about the Rams’ needs…

    in reply to: twitter, reporters, the big articles … Browns game #147321
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    .

    Never seen it, either. …but it’s no, Johnny Quest, apparently.

    You’re Bandit to my Race.

    in reply to: signing another kicker #147313
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Did they reach out to Robbie Gould?  Much better kicker, IMO.

    in reply to: twitter, reporters, the big articles … Browns game #147288
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    When did Raheem Morris become a ‘hybrid coordinator/head coach’ ? Did i miss the memo or somethin?

    Morris is officially designated as the Rams assistant head coach. It just means he inherits the head coach position if McVay misses time for any reason. It’s like he’s the VP and McVay is the president. As a rule guys become assistant head coaches if they’ve been head coaches before, which Morris has. This doesn’t subtract anything from Morris being the Rams defensive coordinator.

    — OK, well, i thought it was like being the designated figurehead. Like Nittany is on this board. Ya know. Like assistant-hybrid-vice-admin. w v

    No Nittany’s powers and responsibilities are different. Morris, for example, does not have power over life and death.

    Yes, or to put it differently, Morris is the Robin to McVay’s Batman, as I am the Sauron to zn’s Morgoth (Melkor).

    And wv is the Stimpy to Zooey’s Ren…

    in reply to: Rams chances for the playoffs #147285
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Given their cupcake schedule, for all practical purposes the Packers are in. That leaves the Rams, Seahawks, and Vikings battling for the final playoff spot. The Rams and Seahawks will both likely finish 9-8, but the Rams own the tiebreaker. The Vikings beat the 49ers but lost to the Bears so it’s hard to know what to expect from them. They get Jefferson back next week but things are still shaky at QB. At least at the moment, the Vikings own the tiebreaker over the Rams based on a better conference record. However, they could easily lose 3 or more of their final 5 games to finish 8-9 or worse.

    Just expanding on what Nittany has said. As we know the Rams face both Baltimore and SF. But also Wash, NO, and NYG. If they lose 2 of those 5 and end up 9-8, as we know they’re in over Seattle. If they beat either Balt or SF they go 10-7 and it’s unlikely either Minn or Seattle could overtake that. Assuming the Rams go 9/8, to lose its 6th seed spot GB would have to win only 2 of the next 5 games. They play NYG, Tampa, Carolina, Minn, and Chi. Does anyone see 3 losses in those games? Though anything can happen of course, which doesn’t make it likely. Minnesota‘s remaining schedule is a meat grinder. I don’t see how they could come out of that in the lead for spot 7. They face the Raiders, but also Cinn, GB, and Detroit twice. The luster is off for Dobbs, who threw 4 INTs against the Bears. If the Rams go 9/8, then Minn has to win 3 games because they have a tie-breaker with the Rams. Seattle faces SF and Phil in consecutive games. They are capable of beating Pitt, Arz, and Tenn. But then for them to get the 7 spot, they need to be a game up on the Rams. Assuming the Rams go 9/8, to get in Seattle has to win 4 of the next 5. That means they have to beat SF or Phil while also winning the ones they look like the can win.

    The key for the Rams will be getting out of Baltimore with no major injuries.  Winning there would be huge, but incredibly unlikely.  As you point out they don’t have to win this game as long as they beat the teams they should beat.

    But this is the Rams.  You know they are going to have a clunker against one of the three teams they should beat (W, NO, NY).

    Which means a playoff spot could be on the line for the final game against SF…

    in reply to: Rams chances for the playoffs #147275
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Given their cupcake schedule, for all practical purposes the Packers are in. That leaves the Rams, Seahawks, and Vikings battling for the final playoff spot. The Rams and Seahawks will both likely finish 9-8, but the Rams own the tiebreaker. The Vikings beat the 49ers but lost to the Bears so it’s hard to know what to expect from them. They get Jefferson back next week but things are still shaky at QB. At least at the moment, the Vikings own the tiebreaker over the Rams based on a better conference record. However, they could easily lose 3 or more of their final 5 games to finish 8-9 or worse.

    So…”Blah, blah, blah.” Did I get that right?

    Isn’t there a Brock Purdy Fan Club meeting you’re missing somewhere?

    in reply to: Rams chances for the playoffs #147266
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Given their cupcake schedule, for all practical purposes the Packers are in.

    That leaves the Rams, Seahawks, and Vikings battling for the final playoff spot.

    The Rams and Seahawks will both likely finish 9-8, but the Rams own the tiebreaker.

    The Vikings beat the 49ers but lost to the Bears so it’s hard to know what to expect from them.  They get Jefferson back next week but things are still shaky at QB. At least at the moment, the Vikings own the tiebreaker over the Rams based on a better conference record. However, they could easily lose 3 or more of their final 5 games to finish 8-9 or worse.

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 3,511 total)