Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 4,561 through 4,590 (of 7,335 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: the "who are the coaches McVay is hiring" thread #63604
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I did a search on Kromer. I got 3 or 4 pages of him being arrested and a bit on him getting into it with Cutler.

    https://search.yahoo.com/search?n=10&ei=UTF-8&va_vt=any&vo_vt=any&ve_vt=any&vp_vt=any&vst=0&vf=all&vm=p&fl=0&fr=sfp&p=Aaron+Kromer&vs=

    i don’t like kromer. besides him being a guy who smacks children around. his track record is spotty at best.

    and i think that devastating buffalo rushing attack had more to do with greg roman than kromer.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    so he’d be lined up outside the guard instead of outside the tackle. i’m guessing that puts more responsibility on that outside linebacker?

    Yes but in that respect it’s no different from the OLB being a DE in the Rams 4/3 D under Williams.

    or rather outside the guard instead of lining up directly opposite the offensive tackle. a 4-3 end would line up outside the tackle.

    well. i don’t know that that helps quinn all that much. he’d still be dealing with that offensive tackle instead of being able to run free.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    found this interesting.

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/defensive-prototypes-3-technique/

    The position has seen an evolution of sorts in recent years. In the past it was associated almost exclusively with pure 4-3 under teams, but more and more we are seeing 3-4 and multiple front teams find a way to get their most talented interior rusher at the 3-technique. Calais Campbell is typically thought of as being a prototypical base 3-4 end, a 5-technique, but the Cardinals lineman spent over half of his snaps in 2014 as a 3-tech.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    so he’d be lined up outside the guard instead of outside the tackle. i’m guessing that puts more responsibility on that outside linebacker?

    in reply to: other teams's head coach searches #63597
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well. ya know. i take that back. he does come off as edgy at times. when he first dealt with bruce, he was a little bit standoffish. same with faulk if i remember correctly.

    but generally no. he doesn’t.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: other teams's head coach searches #63596
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    honestly. i bet all the great ones come off as arrogant.

    Not necessarily. Did Vermeil?

    no, he didn’t. and in fact, i see a little vermeil in mcvay. the same energy. the same leadership qualities that engender loyalty from players well beyond their playing careers. i like that.

    i was a little over the top there. but my point is that arrogance wouldn’t put me off necessarily.

    and what worries me about mcvay isn’t his leadership qualities. it’s that he hasn’t proven himself like shanahan has. shanny has done it time and time and time again. every stop. or at least almost every stop. he’s made a positive impact. now that might mean nothing. you can take wade phillips as an example of a guy that’s improved a defense everywhere he’s went but simply wasn’t head coach material. so yeah. i concede that shanahan might not be head coach material.

    but i’d be lying if i said i wasn’t worried about mcvay’s experience. he’s only ever been at one stop.

    in reply to: Playoffs thread #63587
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Maybe Stan didn’t want to pay for all the change orders to the new stadium…enlarging the doorways so the big headed Shanahans could get through them.

    he may have a big head, but he’s been successful everywhere he’s went. mcvay has done it once.

    but again. it takes a different personality sometimes for a head coach. maybe shanny doesn’t have the leadership qualities that will galvanize an entire organization.

    damn. those running backs in the receiving game!

    in reply to: other teams's head coach searches #63583
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i could care less. honestly. i bet all the great ones come off as arrogant. i’m a little disappointed. i hope i’m wrong.

    maybe he’s too strong a personality for demoff to handle. that’s sad if true. until i’m proven wrong, my opinion is that demoff has no business being vp of football operations. he should stay over on the business operations and public relations side and stuff.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Playoffs thread #63582
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    really wish they would have waited on shanahan. the running game and the passing game. a perfect marriage.

    i just don’t see the same resume with mcvay. of course it comes down to other things than just how you can coordinate an offense. but damn. shanny’s good. and he’s done it over and over again.

    in reply to: the "who are the coaches McVay is hiring" thread #63575
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    on aaron kromer.

    i didn’t realize this until i read this bit over at the herd. as ol coach of the bills, the bills have ranked number one in rushing both years he’s been there. of course when he was in chicago as offensive coordinator, the bears ranked 27th and 16th in rushing. so mixed results.

    also, he may have smacked some kid around and threatened him with death… sounds like a winner.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: snead staying #63572
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i give snead an incomplete. it’s hard to say how much input he exactly had. we know he didn’t have final say in the previous arrangement.

    my hope is that he gets final say from now on and starts to really shine. gets at least one really outstanding draft in and demoff remains on the periphery.

    in reply to: the "who are the coaches McVay is hiring" thread #63558
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Quite often the OL coaches are also the run game coordinators (Hanifan had that role with Martz).

    So he is looking for a coordinator who has input into the running game.

    that’s what i see too. and it’s smart.

    in reply to: speculation conversation…what if they switched to a 3/4 #63540
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    so possibly you’d have

    campbell brockers donald

    rookie forrest tree quinn

    by the way having forrest tree in the middle would be cool wouldn’t it? tee hee!

    and of course depending on down and distance barron could be plugged in for forrest in passing situations.

    in reply to: speculation conversation…what if they switched to a 3/4 #63538
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    what i would do.

    jones and campbell are unrestricted free agents. whoever the cards don’t tag the rams should go hard after. i’m reading it’ll be jones. so get campbell.

    then draft an solb with the second round pick. draft is supposed to be deep in defensive ends. maybe one of them can be converted.

    in reply to: the "who are the coaches McVay is hiring" thread #63537
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Norv Turner is still lookin for work. Not sure his type of O would mesh with McVays, but I’m confident they could put their heads together and work a system out.

    I also like that Norv is focused on balance in the O while I think McVay may be more of a pass oriented type of O guy. This team is gonna need Gurley as they transition to the new O and beyond IMO.

    i agree with you about bringing in someone who is more balanced. i just don’t know that turner is that guy.

    first i think that he is a coryell guy while mcvay is more of a west coast offense.

    second i would think turner would want playcalling duties so unless he’s willing to give that up, it doesn’t look like a match.

    i’m thinking a guy like callahan would work. don’t know that washington would be willing to give him up.

    in reply to: the Rams hire McVay thread #63517
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’m still wondering about the run game. that’s what attracted me to shanahan. hopefully he hires an offensive coordinator who is strong in the running game.

    in reply to: Schefter: Phillips going to sign on with Rams #63513
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    rams have talent. for as much griping as i’ve been doing, i do think this defense has talent. you don’t finish top 10 in total yards without talent. especially when you consider exactly how horrible this offense has been.

    get a better offense should alleviate some problems. and by replacing boras with a more innovative offensive mind such as mcvay they should be able to do that. and hopefully gurley uses the offseason to get back on track. and hopefully goff is who he says he is. the offense should get better.

    but i also am curious to see if phillips can squeeze a little more out of this defense than williams did. phillips has a reputation of getting more out of a defense than the previous regime. let’s see if he can do that here.

    in reply to: the "who are the coaches McVay is hiring" thread #63485
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    nevermind. denver signed him.

    in reply to: the "who are the coaches McVay is hiring" thread #63482
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t know if the fit is there, but i want musgrave. i don’t know what kind of offense he ran, but he did a good job with carr, and the raiders had a good running game.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Gurley welcomes McVay #63455
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i find it curious that he talked to goff and donald but not gurley.

    in reply to: speculation conversation…what if they switched to a 3/4 #63449
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    would a tj watt be available in the second round?

    if i’m the rams, i take the approach that snead always talks about. build dominant units. fortify that front seven. watt and quinn on each side with donald at the 3 technique?

    ooh boy.

    i’m salivating already.

    in reply to: the Rams hire McVay thread #63433
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    washington’s oline coach and the blocking schemes they used under mcvay.

    http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/redskins-ol-coach-bill-callahan-blocking-scheme-will-vary-062315

    When the Washington Redskins hired offensive line coach Bill Callahan, most expected that he would turn over the team’s predominantly zone-blocking scheme and install a power-blocking scheme that he has used throughout his coaching career. Like many of the NFL’s best coaches, Callahan won’t make the mistake of trying to fit the players on the Redskins’ roster into a specific blocking scheme. Instead, he will mix and match to tailor his blocking scheme to suit the strengths of his offensive linemen.

    “I think when you have balance in you running game, whether it’s the gap scheme, the zone scheme, using your draws, using wide zones, or tight zones, or whatever that may be I think it just keeps the defense off balance and it plays to your players’ strengths,” Callahan said, per Real Redskins.

    in reply to: the Rams hire McVay thread #63432
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i found this interesting. apparently the dolphins just blocked the rams from hiring chris foerster as offensive coordinator. mcvay worked with him at washington when the shanahan’s were in charge. foerster was the oline coach during that time. does this mean he’d want a zone blocking scheme???

    i hope so. maybe i’m reading too much into it. but i hope i’m reading that right.

    i liked gurley in the zone blocking scheme.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I also read that he helped the TE, Reed a lot.

    yeah i read that too. that is encouraging to me. he should be able to help out a lot of these young guys. not just jared.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: speculation conversation…what if they switched to a 3/4 #63422
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I think Donald is much more valuable on the D-line. I would be leary of moving perhaps the best DT of his generation to another position.

    no you’re right.

    just thinking out loud.

    i keep donald as the weak side end/3 technique.

    phillips started out as a dline coach.

    he coached ware and watt. they’ve had career years under him.

    i just wonder what kind of plans he’d have for a freakish athlete like donald.

    in reply to: the Rams hire McVay thread #63420
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I think Spags had a bit of that going for him, but he had zero talent to work with. As bad as those teams were, they played hard even after the season was lost.

    yeah. let’s hope he’s luckier too.

    i do think mcvay has the advantage in that this rams team has waaaaaaaaaaaaaay more talent than spags’ rams.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: speculation conversation…what if they switched to a 3/4 #63419
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    If you believe Donald and Quinn are athletic enough to play LB in a 34 and you don’t think that will hurt their production, then you can do a line up like this. Barron is sort of the odd man out. You have enough on the DL and you have backups there too. LBer starts to look thin.

    Or, Wade coaches a 43 until we find more LBers.

    i always wondered about donald as a middle linebacker. he’d be dominant.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    very interesting. i’d want garcon.

    of course mcvay should have a pretty good idea who he’d want but i think i’d want garcon.

    i’d want davis too.

    in reply to: speculation conversation…what if they switched to a 3/4 #63407
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    This thread is about speculation, so speculate.

    there’s no doubt in my mind they need to at least add one more defensive end and one more linebacker to make this front 7 work. here’s some more speculation. in the article i posted above, here’s this little blurb about ware in a 3-4 vs a 4-3.

    Ware at his best

    DeMarcus Ware played eight seasons in the 3-4 defense in Dallas, including 3 1/2 with Wade Phillips as his head coach. Following two seasons in the 4-3, he has switched back to the 3-4 with Phillips as his defensive coordinator in Denver. Here’s how he’s fared in the two defenses over the years.

    table {
    font-size: small;
    }

    Defense (Seasons) Games Tackles/G Sacks/G
    3-4 (2005-12, ’15) 129 4.2 0.9
    4-3 (2013-14) 29 2.8 0.5

    just more evidence in my mind that this switch could benefit quinn greatly.

    in reply to: speculation conversation…what if they switched to a 3/4 #63401
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    link: http://www.denverpost.com/2015/09/16/demarcus-ware-back-in-phillips-3-4-wreaking-havoc/

    The man who helped Ware amass 20 sacks in only their second season together in Dallas is now helping the 11th-year veteran return to his record ways. Phillips’ 3-4 defense is back.

    “I know when they changed to a 4-3 in Dallas, going against a tackle all the time in the game I think wore him down a little bit,” Phillips said. “He seems refreshed here. In this defense, he’s standing up; he doesn’t have to go against the tackle all the time, except in pass-rush situations.

Viewing 30 posts - 4,561 through 4,590 (of 7,335 total)