Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 412 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Non Ram Related but funny. #17959
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    It was a video from facebook of a cardinal fan coming up behind this news lady and standing behind her with the back to the camera and on his Jersey where the name goes it says F’ck Seattle. Apparently Facebook will not allow me or this site will not allow me to share the video link from FB here.

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Mac or ZN do me a favor and delete my quote response to 21 Dog here is a much better response.

    You know, Mr. Steinberg didn’t have to show up on Sunday. I’m sure he has a very full schedule and he lives far away from the Coliseum. I think he is earnest and sincere in his fandom for the Rams and his support of the movement to bring the Rams back to LA. When I saw him walk up to the group on Sunday morning he was by himself and may have driven himself there. I just want to thank Lee Steinberg for lending his support to our cause.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Mac, I’ll strive to keep it fun but keep in mind as a Moderator that keeping it fun does not mean I turn a blind eye to negative comments. I would ask you remind those people to keep it fun as well.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/prishe/2015/01/12/assessing-the-merits-issues-with-proposed-stadium-along-st-louis-riverfront/

    Great article by Patrick Rishe of Forbes on the economics of the move the impact on St Louis as well.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    You ask me to keep it fun when I have people like 21Dog is known to make negative comments on anything I post. Including comments about an obviously qualified person such as Lee Steinberg who respected by many. Or did you not read 21Dog’s comments.
    Keeping it fun goes both ways.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/rams-report/jones-interview-with-times-took-place-in-irving-not-green/article_b32e4f4f-4c2f-512f-9275-7fd5d4963d96.html

    “Contrary to Mr. Grubman’s fanciful depiction of what happened, our reporter was quoting Mr. Jones from an interview conducted in his office in Irving, Texas, about 1,100 miles from Green Bay, several days before the Cowboys’ loss to the Packers,” said New York Times editor Jason Stallman via e-mail.

    OOPS!

    “That’s why Eric may have thought the comment was made there,” NFL vice president Greg Aiello told the Post-Dispatch via e-mail. “Eric’s point was about the substance of the comments, not where they were made. Where they were made is irrelevant.

    More oops! Really Mr. Aiello? It doesn’t matter? I think it matters a lot when besmirch the rep of one of your owners saying he wasn’t in his right mind.

    Grits

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by GreatRamNTheSky.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by zn.
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    More from the Rams rally in LA on Sunday. It was a great turnout.

    Go LA Rams!

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Bring Back The Rams RallyOver 1500 fans at the Rally in LA on Sunday

    Grits

    in reply to: Jim Tomsula new 49ers HC #16732
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Screw the Farty-Whiners who gives a shit about them? I hope they turn into a joke and lose for the next 20 years just the Rams did under Frontiere.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Bottom line, from that Grubman story, is that the STL group has to put together all of the particulars NOW of how they plan to build an NFL stadium. If they can’t do that get their ducks in a row by the end of this year, it sure sounds like that leaves the door open for Stan to move whenever he pleases.

    Just my opinion but and I think you said this in a sense but, I think Grubman is in STL to rubber stamp this thing as concluded. and I think that the league is not going to kill an 80,000 seat stadium in LA to keep STL happy.

    Stan is moving and the league knows it. Grubman even said the league was made aware of the City of Champions deal before it was announced.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    One very interesting thing that Grubman said yesterday. When asked about Kroenke’s announcement and if it caught the league by surprise two weeks ago now, Grubman said they were made aware it was coming and they expected it. BOOM!

    Okay, so, they didn’t exactly tell Kroenke not to do it, did they? Oh my, after the alleged there shall be no teams moving to LA in 2015 and they give Kroenke the thumbs up on the City of Champions? Hell yes they did! You know why because now they have a viable stadium situation in LA. An 80,000 seat palace which only needs approval of the Citizens of Inglewood and let me tell you that the response from the citizens of Inglewood is favorable. They are collecting signatures already and if they get enough signatures this will not even have to be put to a public vote in June. It would be confirmed by as early as March.

    One thing the league allegedly stated was that 2015 would be a year they identify viable stadium options in LA. And they knew this City of Champions announcement was coming. Interesting, don’t you think?

    One other statement Grubman made was St Louis is going to have to build a new stadium. Lets focus on that word “New” for a moment. Peacock’s presentation was for a new stadium, however, if you compare that 64,000 seat 1970s style stadium Peacock has proposed compared to AT&T Stadium in Dallas, the new Falcons 70,000 seat stadium in Atlanta and the City of Champions 80,000 seat stadium you may come to understand that “New” means new as in style of stadium trending in the NFL. AT&T has set the bar high folks and Kroenke has already set up a deal that will give the league a brand new 80,000 seat stadium in Inglewood/ LA.

    Get the drift? Grubman is being very professional and saying all the right things but lets be clear. The league is not going to kill a deal for an 80,000 seat stadium in LA and keep the Rams in the love child of QualCom and Anaheim stadium.

    Grubman is in STL to rubber stamp the league’s position.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    There was another article in the ESPN San Diego website and Mark Fabiani was on the Mighty 1090 yesterday and was spiting fire at local businessmen in San Diego. Fabiani was very clear that the Chargers are being backed into a corner because teams (Rams) are threatening to move into LA and they Chargers are going to have to make a move to protect themselves.

    Okay, lets see what logically the Chargers can do.

    Lawsuit? Not likely. Too expensive and could last several years. In the mean time Kroenke moves into LA and as they say, possession is 9/10 of the law.

    Partner with Kroenke on the City of Champions Project? If Kroenke and the Roderick group are open to it, why not. The league allegedly would like two teams in LA.

    Make a deal with Anschultz and sell him 35 percent minority ownership in the team. Hey, the Lakers did it when the Staples Center was built. Why not? Seems there are not many good options left for Spanos and the Chargers.

    Spanos and the Chargers can wait and dig their heels into the mud in SD as they have done for over a decade now and end up a BIG LOSER IN all of this and still not have a viable stadium in SD.

    Sometimes you have to compromise and Spanos may have to learn that lesson rather quickly.

    Grits

    in reply to: Adam Gase Rams next OC? #16661
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    I don’t get the feeling that even though teams have talked to Gase about being a head coach, that, they are sold on him just yet as a head coach. So, he is going to be an OC somewhere. I think the Rams have better skilled players on offense then San Francisco or Oakland and unless Denver hires him as the HC I can’t see him staying there as the OC.

    I think Rams have a real good shot at this guy as the OC.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant


    Great video by reporter Eric Geller.
    former and current Rams are coaching the NFLPA squads in Carson / LA this week for the NFLPA all star game which takes place this Saturday Jan 17th. Eric interviews Jackie Slater, Nolan Cromwell, Lawrence McCutcheon, Greg Williams and Tre Mason about the move back to LA.

    Grits

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by GreatRamNTheSky.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by zn.
    in reply to: Cardale Jones #16624
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    At number 10 I think either Bryce Petty from Baylor or Brett Hundley from UCLA would be good picks.

    Grits

    in reply to: Adam Gase Rams next OC? #16571
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    If Rams hire Gase, could Peyton Manning be an option at QB for Rams?

    Heard Collin Cowherd say that if Broncos let Gase go then it is a sign they are stepping away from Manning.
    If Manning heals up and wants to give it one more try could the Rams be his next landing spot?

    Manning guiding the offense might make the Rams defense better as well.

    Bye, bye Sam, hello Peyton, draft a young QB to be groomed behind Peyton?

    Yah, Peyton will be 39 but remember that Farve, Jurgensen and Kilmer all played into their 40s.

    Would be fun to watch.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    She already made it happen.

    Oh you mean by stealing LA’s team and moving them after threatening the league with an Anti-Trust suit she made it happen.
    Same thing you St Louis boys are whining about Kroenke doing now.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/13/sports/football/buffalo-bills-make-it-official-rex-ryan-is-their-coach.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=1

    Jerry Jones “The Rams can move” from the NY Times. See the linc
    JONES SAYS RAMS CAN MOVE When the St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke announced plans last week to build an 80,000-seat football stadium near downtown Los Angeles, it raised the specter that he might unilaterally move his team to Southern California.

    After his announcement, the N.F.L. reiterated that any team relocation must be approved by at least 24 out of the league’s 32 owners. The N.F.L. controls the Los Angeles market, and Commissioner Roger Goodell has said that any move there must be done in an orderly way.

    But in an interview last week, the Dallas Cowboys’ owner, Jerry Jones, said that while he prefers that the owners approve any team moving to Los Angeles, a team could possibly move there without league approval.

    Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story

    Continue reading the main story

    “As it would turn out now, apart from the league saying no, you can move there,” he said. “Keep in mind that teams have moved without the permission of the league. They just have.”

    Asked if Kroenke could move on his own, Jones said: “He can if the league says he can’t.”

    Asked if the N.F.L. preferred to coordinate any relocation, Jones said: “Again, there are just certain things that clubs can do.”

    Jones’s comments are bound to stir interest in a murky and emotional process because he is one of the N.F.L.’s most powerful and unconventional owners.
    The league said last month that the Rams, the San Diego Chargers and the Oakland Raiders would not move to Los Angeles in 2015. But Kroenke has the ability to shift to a year-to-year lease at the Edward Jones Dome, where the Rams play.

    That would give him the flexibility to leave St. Louis in the coming years.

    “The idea of Stan going ahead and making his announcement was driven by all of the right things,” said Jones, who cited Kroenke’s having a deal for a location and his owning a team with “a great legacy.”

    Jones added, “All of that is to me a very positive thing for Los Angeles and for the N.F.L.”

    Last week, civic leaders in Missouri unveiled plans to build a new 64,000-seat outdoor stadium in downtown St. Louis to persuade Kroenke to stay. KEN BELSON

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Zooey wrote:</div>
    You mean he will enrich himself by more than a billion dollars, and not have to pay taxes on it because of the way the numbers look on paper?

    I don’t know about any of that. But, I assume he has to pay a relocation fee (which is stiff) and of course there was buying the land, building the stadium, and moving the team. I am guessing that’s around 2.5 billion at least, all told.

    I don’t think that any any revenue he gets annually from the facilities, the gate, the luxury boxes, and the “retail park” will add up to 2.5 billion in his lifetime.

    I think his main thing is just the value of the franchise itself, which of course is not the same as cash flow.

    Stan didn’t buy any additional land to what he purchased a year ago. He partnered with the Roderick company.
    Sounds to me like the cost of building the stadium is already figured into the total cost of The City of Champions Project.
    And both the Roderick Company and the Kroenke Group are going to be reimbursed via rebates based upon percentage for how profitable the who area is.

    Is the physical move of the team going to cost a billion? I don’t know.

    Is the relocation fee going to be a billion? Not according to some knowledgeable people I’ve heard talk on the subject.

    Not sure where you get the 2.5 billion.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    There is the possibility of two teams in LA, so even if Spanos wants LA himself, his preference for that is still not a deciding factor. I’m sure Spanos can make this thing messy, but ultimately to what end? Even if he stops Kroenke, he is no closer to moving to LA.

    Spanos would only cost himself money he cannot afford to lose and at the same time alienate the league. Spanos wouldn’t be crying like this at this time if he didn’t think the Rams were moving in 2015. Interesting huh?

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Didn’t they also leave LA voluntarily?

    YES! Baron Hilton who owned the Chargers at the time left LA because he could not compete with the Rams.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    I can’t believe someone is posting that Shane Gray crap here.

    As for the Chargers filing suit to block the Rams. Fat chance!

    1st of all San Diego is 2 hours away from LA. 121 miles. They call themselves San Diego, not Los Angeles so they are not a home team for LA.

    There is already decades worth of history as proof the chargers survived and were profitable with the Rams and then the Rams and Raiders in LA.

    The Rams tried to block the Raiders from moving to LA in 1982 and that failed. The Redskins tried to block Art Modell from moving the old Browns / Ravens into the Baltimore / DC area and that failed.

    Spanos hasn’t a leg to stand on.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Wouldn’t it be cool if it worked out that Georgia’s lasting legacy is the Rams being banned from returning to LA in perpetuity! Go Spanos!

    Dream on but it ain’t going to happen.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Lets not forget there is another side to this whole story that you guys are not talking about. Stan moves the team to LA and then sells it for 3 billion and then becomes the owner of the Broncos.

    Are there buyers who could pay the 3 billion? Oh hell yes! Steve Ballmer who just bought the Clippers, the Guggenheims who purchased the Dodgers and there is another fellow known as the richest man in LA but his name escapes me at this time.

    Yah, there is a market.

    Grits

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #16323
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    My goodness. You guys have really gone to town on this subject. Good stuff too. I’ve read a few of the posts.

    I think we all agree that the Rams are moving back to LA. If we just approach this from a business standpoint it makes perfect sense.

    Stan’s plan benefits the league as well. I think Stan was cognizant of that and made sure that there was stuff benefitting the league in this deal.

    One huge benefit is the league’s network is in LA and now they are going to have a marquee base of operations with a studio built either into that stadium or on the same grounds near it.

    Nobody and I mean nobody in St Louis is trumpeting the ugly edifice that is Peacock’s proposal. Most telling is that the Governor and the Mayor didn’t bother to show either.

    64,000 seat 1970s style stadium that is going to cost a billion dollars. 2,000 seats less in seating capacity than the Edward Jones dome. 16,000 less seats than the palace that Kroenke is going to build in Inglewood.

    As for the league stopping Kroenke from moving? I get the sense the league gave Kroenke the okay to announce this deal.

    I heard a local sports guy a few weeks ago, John Ireland on ESPN LA and he is the play by play guy for the Lakers as well and his take on this initial no teams moving in 2015 was some kind of negotiating ploy. It was about a week later that The City of Champions Project in Inglewood was announced.

    I don’t think Kroenke is the type of guy who would deliberately try to piss off his business partners. Those being the other owners in the NFL.

    The NFL is not a bunch of dummies, I think they knew this was coming. They also realize that keeping the team in St Louis for 2015 is not a good idea because the atmosphere there is going to be toxic. I think you will see Kroenke move the team and it may even appear he’s doing it against league wishes. This way he takes the hit as Simon Legree the evil villain and the league will work things out as the did in 1995 and the Rams will be in LA. Remember this. The Rams played in Busch Stadium in 1995. The Dome was not ready when they moved there. So now they play in either the Rose Bowl or the Coliseum until 2018.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Love SunTzu’s post. Well thought out.

    I personally believe and admittedly I am biased for LA and you all know that.

    I Personally believe the Rams and the league are both in alliance on the Kroenke LA proposal in Inglewood.
    For Mr. Peacock, comparing his open air cute little stadium to the 80,000 seat NFL palace in Inglewood is like trying to trump paradise with a nice little rose garden by the river.

    Back in the 1970s or early 80s Peacock’s stadium plan may have been really something but today its really boring.
    The concept for the stadium looks like it was borrowed from a number of older stadiums that exist today.

    Lets talk about seating capacity. 64,000 seats, 2000 less than the EJD which is 66,000. 16,000 less than the stadium proposed in Inglewood which is 80,000. Then we get into the save the Riverfront aspect which is very nice. I appreciate preservation of our history vs the NFL theme and the other features of the City of Champions project. The historic riverfront stuff does nothing for the NFL. The City of Champions Project will be all inclusive of the NFL experience including a studio for the NFL network which is based in Los Angeles.

    Kroenke’s plan is to be privately financed. Peacock’s plan involves public funding and what is going to be the return for the NFL on the Peacock plan? No where near as much as the return on the new stadium in Inglewood with all that includes and no where near as much as being in the Entertainment capital of the nation if not the world. The City of Champions project screams Super Bowls and final fours and other huge events. Peacock’s stadium? Really, a Super Bowl in a 64,000 seat stadium?

    Maybe Peacock’s plan will eventually bring another team desperate for a stadium to STL but, it won’t be the Rams.

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    After that presentation all I can say is you better start breaking out your old LA Rams gear because that deal is not trumping what is happening for the league and Kroenke in LA.

    Grits

    in reply to: Anyone giving Seattle a chance over Carolina? #16001
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Geez, I think the Hawks are going to be feasting on Cat this weekend.

    I just cannot imagine Romo winning this kind of game.

    Brady for one last hurrah.

    Luck will prevail.

    Grits

    in reply to: Blitz is blotto on facts #15999
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    Yah, that presentation was not very good.

    Also,
    1. Gee, Gov Nixon, so fired up about Peacock and Blitz November 5th does not show up for presentation January 9th.
    Wow that was impressive. Is the old Gov beginning to distance himself from this plan?

    There will be no financing without a committment of a team. That is so WE DON’T HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHAT THE FINANCING IS.

    2. I’m sure Kroenke is turning cartwheels about having to foot 400 million for a stadium he will not own that has ONLY 64,000 SEATS!!! And will not be ready until 2020? BTW Peacock. The 80,000 seat stadium in Inglewood is projected to open in 2018 and will be privately funded.

    3. How many Super Bowls is that 64,000 seat stadium by the Muddy Missouri going to get as opposed to that 80,000 seat stadium in LA aka Hollywood, Beveryly Hills, Malibu Beautiful sunny Socal! Think the league and Kroenke are willing to make that trade?

    Too little too late, sorry guys gotta run, LA is calling!

    Grits

    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    what has continuity done for Bradford or the Rams? Bradford cannot stay on the field long enough to benefit from it.
    Now his OC is gone. Oh well, too bad.

    Grits

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 412 total)