Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › the #10 — OL or BPA?
- This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
sdram.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 28, 2015 at 8:55 pm #21701
znModeratorfrom off the net
—
Memphis Ram
If an OLineman is the BPA on the Rams draft board, they would be wrong to pass on him. But, they would be just as wrong to ignore their draft board and reach for a need.
So many focus on round one, but what’s wrong with starting to address the position in the 2nd, 3rd, and/or 4th round in a deep draft class and NOT banking on these rookies to start immediately if they can pick up some vet alternatives?
Each draft class is different. And while not top heavy, this appears to be a pretty deep OLine class. On top of that, math and history tell me that the majority of 1st round OLinemen selected are usually LTs (immediate starters or to guys be groomed to eventually take over) and the Rams already have one.
Continuing with that premise, the same history tells me that loads of quality interior lineman and RTs have been typically selected outside of the first round for years now. And those two points combined (loads of quality non-LTs outside of of the 1st round plus a deep draft class of non LTs) tell me that the chances of finding an elite/very good player outside of round one THIS YEAR is darn strong. Even stronger as opposed to other draft classes (a key point).
While great to have, a team doesn’t have to have a group of elite/very good players up and down their OLine to have success on offense. Five solid to above average guys working together on the same page and not missing to much time due to injuries can provide a team with very good OLine for a successful offense. Especially, in a good scheme with a QB worth his salt.
And it’s pretty hard, if not impossible, to finally fix a unit that has the potential to change every year or so due to injuries and/or free agency anyway. At least I’m having a hard time recalling an OLine unit in the league that has had the same 5 guys starting each game year after year.
March 28, 2015 at 9:06 pm #21702
TSRFParticipantI hope they go BPA, and I hope that means D; I’d be happy with DE, MLB or CB.
Build the pie higher.
March 28, 2015 at 9:51 pm #21705
znModeratormath and history tell me that the majority of 1st round OLinemen selected are usually LTs (immediate starters or to guys be groomed to eventually take over) and the Rams already have one.
What percentage of linemen drafted in round 1 in the last 11 years (back to 2004) were left OTs?
I can only count where they ended up, not the intention. So for example Jason Smith was supposed to be a left OT but ended up at right.
Given that–
lineman drafted in round 1 back to 2004.
23 are LOTs …38%
12 are ROTs …20%
6 are OCs …10%
16 are OGs …27%
3 are OTs or OGs, not settled yet…5%One note: the number of guards taken to BE guards (as opposed to washing out at tackle and ending up at guard) has gone up considerably in the last 4 years. From 2004-2010, it’s 7 guards…from 2011-2014, it’s 9.
…
March 28, 2015 at 11:51 pm #21706
JackPMillerParticipantWhat about trading down? Maybe there are a few guys listed closely and they feel it may better to trade down, and believe one the BPA’s will still be there. Or vice versa
March 29, 2015 at 8:33 am #21713
PA RamParticipantI think trading down this year is a real option.
BUT….if a special players is there at #10…Amari Cooper, perhaps?
I’m still not sure about that though, because this team NEEDS linemen in the worst way and Fisher said they’re taking a QB which probably means round two and certainly by round #3. So if they think a guy like Scherff is the only worthy lineman at #10 and he’s gone, my preference would probably be to trade down and grab a couple of guys.
Here’s what I hope DOESN’T happen: Mariotta slips past the Jets to #7 and the Rams decide to make a move for him.
They need their picks and I am just not sold on Mariotta.
I’d rather go with Foles and the other guys and a lower round rookie and GET the linemen.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
March 29, 2015 at 12:03 pm #21718
sdramParticipantFor Rams draft strategy – today I’m thinking they should trade down to the 20 t0 25 range and pick between three or four different OL prospects that could be available and then add another second round pick to draft their potential “franchise QB of the future” and another OL. That leaves 4 picks in the third through seventh round to add depth.
I really like Amari Cooper but I venture to guess that he’ll be gone by their pick at 10.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

