Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 2,881 through 2,910 (of 8,122 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: setting up the Arizona playoff game (us, the media, etc.) #135420
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    We can beat the Cowboys. They are a suckie team.

    Not much chance of the Rams meeting up with Dallas. It would be in the NFC Championship. Unless the Eagles beat Tampa.

    in reply to: Rams signing (gulp) Weddell #135417
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t remember Weddle playing that great.

    I remember Weddell playing somewhere between Mediocre and Poorly.

    And that was two years ago.

    I think he will be on the sideline in a case with a glass door to be broken in an emergency.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #135412
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams signing (gulp) Weddell #135410
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I guess they couldn’t sign John Johnson instead, for some reason.

    Sometimes I don’t like the way the “legal” stuff works in the NFL.

    in reply to: 2022 Season opponents #135399
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    10 home games next year.

    11 if you count Raymond James as a home game.

    in reply to: setting up the Arizona playoff game (us, the media, etc.) #135397
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I agree.

    I haven’t seen the Packers or Bucs play much, but I have heard radio blabbers say they are vulnerable. The Packers, I think, have the edge. They have home field advantage. They’ve been consistent. And their QB is pretty good. 4 INTs all year, I think I saw.

    The Bucs have some injuries.

    And the 49ers are just pretty good. Weaker secondary and QB play, but very good everywhere else. And they are coached goodly.

    The Rams will beat AZ. But I don’t see them winning 4 in a row. I don’t see them winning 3 in a row. I’m hoping for 2. Get to the championship. I would take that result pretty gladly.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #135389
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 1/10 – 11/13 #135388
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    A secondary that was over-flowing with talent last year is now a bit thin.

    in reply to: reporters & twitter on the 9ers game #135387
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The 49ers won the battle in the trenches. The defensive line pressured Stafford 28 times. On the other side of the ball, the 49ers’ offensive line only allowed seven total pressures of Jimmy Garoppolo.

    If I was coach, I would start with this fact before the next game against SF.

    in reply to: Playoff Schedule: Monday Night Game? #135384
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I would love to see a third one. Thrilla in SoFilla.

    That whole weekend was marvelous, for NFL fans.
    Some of the best games of the year all
    clustered together.

    Yes to both of those things.

    I wouldn’t place any money on it without some outstanding odds, but I don’t think it would defy the gods for a 3rd matchup to happen.

    I think the Rams and 9ers both win next week. And I don’t think it’s crazy to think SF can beat GB and the Rams win in Tampa the following week.

    And that’s what I’m hoping for.

    BTW, I officially hate the 9ers again. Like…I hate them. So that’s good.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 1/10 – 11/13 #135381
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Matthew Stafford’s passer rating yesterday when targeting:

    Kupp: 158.3
    All other WRs: 16.3

    That does not include TE, though. Just saying.

    in reply to: Playoff Schedule: Monday Night Game? #135380
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I’m not sure I’ve seen as bad an Oline performance as I saw
    in that second half. 49ers just mauled everything that moved

    The 9ers D was getting after it the first half, but the Rams were winning anyway. They put up 17 points on them.

    The 2nd half was as you say.

    So the question is why. The personnel didn’t change at the half. And the scheme didn’t change. They were still sending only 4 on most downs. But they just trashed the Rams’ OL in the second half.

    The thing that makes the most sense to me is that Shanahan amped up his team at the half, and told them their season was on the line, and that if they didn’t get after it with everything they had, they weren’t going to go to the playoffs. And McVay said, “Attaway, guys! Keep it up!”

    And the 9ers lit the Rams up with their intensity until McVay regrouped the team on the sideline.

    Let’s hope he learns from that.

    in reply to: Playoff Schedule: Monday Night Game? #135365
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    eems like the #2 seed should get that slot because they don’t have to travel if they win.

    But…whatever.

    The Rams should beat AZ, and they do seem to own the deed to Raymond James stadium.

    So let’s just do that.

    All in favor, say Aye….

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #135344
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Crap.

    Rams play Monday night.

    Then travel on a short week.

    I don’t like that at all.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #135342
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    If you are going to throw on 3rd down at the end of the half, why the heck wouldn’t you run play action instead of empty set.

    That was a very weird call. I hated it before the snap, and sounds like everyone else did, too.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #135341
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I concur with people pointing the finger at coaching. That’s what I’ve been thinking about since the end of the game. I think Shanahan is a better coach than McVay, and that’s that.

    McVay is brilliant in his memory, and his play design, and everybody likes him. But he’s lost 6 straight times to Shanahan with better talent.

    I think he had a good game plan this time, but the Rams went into halftime feeling good about their play, and their game plan, and they sat around high-fiving each other. Meanwhile, Shanahan probably told his team that they had 30 minutes left, and they could either go on vacation, or get back on the field and fight like hell for a place in the playoffs. And they went out and just threw 100% into every single play, and pushed the Rams around.

    McVay eventually circled the wagons, and got the Rams back in the game, but Stafford underthrew a wide open Beckham, and that’s that.

    The good news is that the Rams get AZ next week. Meanwhile, the 9ers go to Dallas (I believe), and I expect both teams to win. That would send SF to GB and the Rams to Tampa, so…I dunno…that particular configuration may lead to SF returning to LA in 3 weeks time.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #135325
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    There goes McVay’s 43-0 halftime streak

    in reply to: Can we beat the 49ers? #135320
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Kittle says its going to be a ‘bodybag game.’

    Now, I would put that on a bulletin board,
    if i had one.

    w
    v

    Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead.

    in reply to: The Playoffs #135317
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    My motto for the playoffs? Fuck them all, big and small.

    Bring them on. Whoever. Crush, kill, destroy…

    Right. Ripping through them all would be just fine. Eagles, Bucs/Cowboys, Packers on the road, then the Whoevers. That would be just fine.

    And…with the Eagles now down by 5 scores at home, maybe they aren’t as good as I’ve been hearing from the radios.

    in reply to: Can we beat the 49ers? #135307
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Saw an interview with Mcvay he was asked if he thought the 9ers were are #1 rivals, his answer was cringe worthy in the same low energy attitude his whole team showed up with in the 1st game.The guy just doesn’t get it. I expect a flat Rams team getting their ass kicked on national TV again.

    McVay acts like the Rams have proven they are superior to the 49ers every year by finishing ahead of them in the standings, and he doesn’t take them seriously.

    in reply to: Can we beat the 49ers? #135301
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Saw a vid where Baldy is picking the niners.

    So am i. Still dont trust this team.
    I just think San Fran has more urgency and fire.

    Rams 15
    49ers 17

    w
    v

    in reply to: Can we beat the 49ers? #135299
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I haven’t heard much talk of the game on NoCal radio, but what I have heard reflects a somewhat skeptical outlook. The talkers up in these parts are not terribly optimistic, though they remain hopeful. They are all saying the odds of the 9ers winning this game are not very good, and they don’t expect to make the playoffs. They aren’t giving up. But they are pretty guarded.

    This evening, they were singing a different tune. I heard about 15 minutes, and I guess the 9ers are going to attack Travin Howard all day with Kittle and the running game because he weighs only 211 lbs, and the Rams can’t stop the run anyway, so the 9ers will control the ball all day, limiting the Rams’ offensive snaps, AND Armstead and Nick Bosa (who will soon be the highest paid defensive player in history, due in part to his performance this coming Sunday), well, they are going to pretty much prevent Stafford from ever getting a throw off before getting hit, so their depleted secondary won’t actually have to do much in pass defense anyway.

    in reply to: Can we beat the 49ers? #135290
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The 49ers secondary, linebackers, and RB seem to be a bit of a wreck between injuries and Covid.

    https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/teams/SF/san-francisco-49ers/depth-chart/

    Of course, the Rams are without Tutu Atwell, so that kind of balances the thing out.

    in reply to: highlights & play break downs & other visual aids #135287
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Can we beat the 49ers? #135281
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I haven’t heard much talk of the game on NoCal radio, but what I have heard reflects a somewhat skeptical outlook. The talkers up in these parts are not terribly optimistic, though they remain hopeful. They are all saying the odds of the 9ers winning this game are not very good, and they don’t expect to make the playoffs. They aren’t giving up. But they are pretty guarded.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #135276
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Don’t Look Up #135275
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Look. It is MY role to be the senile one.

    We talked about Ishmael long, long ago. Back in the book-baking days.
    I believe it was one of Pa Ram’s faves. I liked it, too.

    The one Quinn wrote after that, was not very good.

    And yeah, you can find plenty of books that are anti-cap.
    And you can find them because the system knows, Americans dont read.

    Well, you know, I tend to scroll past a bunch of book-bakers talking about various recipes for baking books that I haven’t heard of.

    Fortunately, right around that time, I was inseminating a woman who would give birth to a son who would later introduce the book to me in its raw, unbaked form.

    Which I read.

    Now I’m going to put some frosting on it, and put it on eBay.

    in reply to: Don’t Look Up #135263
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, that is my point. And it would NOT…have…been…made, if it had
    indicted Capitalism in direct, understandable, unambiguous terms. No studio would have touched it. Paramount sold it to Netflix. Neither would have touched it.

    Yes, of course.

    If you want material that indicts what we are doing, try the novel Ishmael, by Daniel Quinn. It’s a pretty good read, mostly a kind of Socratic dialogue. It indicts the cultural assumptions going back to the “dawn” of civilization, the way of seeing the world that made Capitalism possible.

    My son gave it to me for my birthday, and I read it over Christmas break. Good book.

    in reply to: Don’t Look Up #135256
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think the simple explanation is that most people (especially the limousine libs that work in Hollywood) don’t believe Capitalism is at fault for what’s happening. I don’t think they see it as *necessarily* bad. They see it as something that is often misused, but redeemable and maybe even good when not wielded by greedy industrialists and billionaires.

    I think this is correct.

    The movie ends with that belief crushed by a comet.

    But it does not make point clear that the blue team is complicit. The red team is drawn with more distinct lines. The blue team is there, but they aren’t identified as the blue team. Thus many viewers miss the point. I think that’s true to say.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    “Stafford leads the entire NFL in 2nd half passer rating.”

    It’s a good point.

    Yep. I did not know that, either.

    “He leads the league when it matters.”

    I just think that’s important to throw into the conversation while we all sit here griping about the TOs he has had.

    On Cowherd, I like him because he is well-informed, and doesn’t make an ego-spectacle of himself. I used to really enjoy sports radio, but I can barely take any of it anymore. So much of it is bombast over substance. Cowherd and Greenberg are a couple of guys who are usually “listenable.” On the big stage, I mean. There are good voices that are less well-known, of course.

Viewing 30 posts - 2,881 through 2,910 (of 8,122 total)