Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 211 through 240 (of 7,208 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Verse, Fiske, & the Rams DL since week 8 #153468
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i like verse’s vibe. a lot. fiske is cool too. but definitely more subdued.

    i feel like the rams haven’t had that kind of personality in awhile.

    maybe since london fletcher? i don’t know. reminds me of guys like kevin greene and john randle.

    LIKE

    in reply to: around the league week 12 #153467
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Just heard. Purdy is out.

    NoCal is talking about the draft.

    in reply to: setting up the Philly game #153465
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Eagles
    Saints
    Bills
    49ers
    Jets
    Cards
    Seahawks

    I like the fact this is a tough 7 game schedule. (the dolphin loss was an absolute killer)

    I assume they can beat the Jets. 🙂 Other than that, every game can go either way, in my mind.

    Today’s prediction is Losses to Eagles, 49ers, Seahawks. Wins against Bills Cards Jets. I have zero thots on the Saints game. Maybe a tie.

    8-8-1

    w
    v

    My Bingo card has a Win over the Eagles. And the Saints, Jets, 9ers, and Seahawks. I think the 9ers are unravelling. Just too many injuries and a shoddy OL. They’ll beat the Seahawks because they’ve beaten them, like, 47 times in a row, and I don’t think that’s going to change. The Jets and Saints are target practice. The Bills will crush them, and I have no idea what will happen with AZ, but it will be winner-take-all, imo.

    The 9ers, btw, have the 2nd-hardest remaining schedule. They is done.

    in reply to: around the league week 12 #153462
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    They worked on Purdy’s shoulder before practice yesterday, and held him out. I didn’t hear anything new this morning, but Bosa, Trent Williams, and Purdy were all out yesterday, and there is concern. If they don’t play on Sunday, the 9ers are gonna lose. They probably will lose anyway, but they have no chance without those guys.

    I haven’t heard about Kittle’s condition, but he and Williams are the only guys on the OL who can block, and in Kittle’s absence, the 9ers rush game has been bad. It’s still top 10, I think, but without Kittle, it’s been bottom 1/3 of the league the last couple of weeks.

    It just isn’t their year. Been there, done that, recognize the symptoms.

    Incidentally, Deebo has had a significant falloff in breaking tackles. McCaffrey and Kittle have a lot of mileage, and looks like Deebo is fading, too. The outlook for the 49ers is absolutely brilliant. And to make it even better, some Shanahan grumblings have started, and that makes the picture even rosier. There is speculation that the league has “figured him out.” I think that’s bollocks, and I doubt there is any concern inside 49er headquarters, but it’s fun to listen to the fans whine.

    • This reply was modified 3 months ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. 11/21 – 11/23 #153449
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 11/19 – 11/20 #153412
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    TBH, looks like 1 of 3.

    And grammatically, I don’t think the word “only” works in this situation.

    But I have essays to grade, so I’m out of here.

    in reply to: around the league, week 11 #153391
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    NoCal radio stations were all slitting their wrists over the 49ers today. Cheered me up a lot.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Patz game #153372
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, and Braden Fiske. Another sack and another forced fumble.

    2 sacks.

    I assume that as a 9ers fan you hate Fiske–not as much as Donald of course but still–yet you should nevertheless try to rise above that and endeavor to be objectively honest.

    Oh, I realized my typo almost immediately, and I thought that I could go back and edit it to correct the problem, but then I thought, nobody but a Seahawks fan would be crass enough to point out my error, and here we are.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Patz game #153369
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, and Braden Fiske. Another sack and another forced fumble.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Patz game #153367
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Drake Maye looks the part of a starting QB.

    The OL was better than last week, but not as good as it was against MN and SEA. Stafford had a few WTF throws again this week, though not as many as last week. I wondered during the game if he has an injury somewhere in his throwing arm. He’s not as sharp as he was to start the season, and Miami beat him up.

    There are still seven games to go, and the Rams could tighten things up. The offense just hasn’t gelled, and I will guess that it will. The defense seems to be less about cohesion, and more about raw inexperience and rookie mistakes. There’s reason to be hopeful on that front, too.

    The Rams did what they had to do today – beat an inferior opponent – but they didn’t look real good doing it. Even when they were in control on the scoreboard, it didn’t feel like they were in control of the game, and in fact, they weren’t. NE still had a chance in the closing minutes.

    I think that loss against MIA is the one they couldn’t afford. They gave away their margin. To reach 10 wins now means going 5-2 to close the season, and that doesn’t look likely. But if they don’t do that, they aren’t really in the hunt anyway. They COULD win the division at 9-8, but that’s not a “serious” team.

    To go 5-2, they will probably have to knock off either Philly or Buffalo to make up for the MIA loss, and if they can’t do that, then this isn’t their year anyway. They will also probably face a Must Win against AZ.

    in reply to: Rams free agents – who do they keep? #153326
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Jackson, maybe Robinson.

    Some of the other guys will be available in September if they have an injury bug at a position. Some of them are just not going to get the vet minimum anywhere.

    in reply to: the election #153164
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    Okay. Well, I’m not a a loss for reasons for wishing she had won, and I’m a bit jaded etc., but all that is heartening. Nevertheless, we iz fecked.

    ZOOEY–I don’t know how in the fuck I did that, but I ended up editing you instead of quoting you. WTF. 

    • This reply was modified 3 months, 2 weeks ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: the election #153158
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’m sure being a woman of color didn’t help, but yeah…

    Right. Which speaks to the fact there are some factions in the Blue or Red pies that are just givens. There is a white supremacist faction that will always go Republican. And Patriarchal ‘family values’ fundamentalist christian faction that will always go Republican. Also a white-wealthy-country-club crowd that will always go Rep. So, yeah, the woman of color thing hurt the pr0-genocide, pro-ecocide, soul-less, mind-numbingly-dull Dem. w v

    What they need is an exciting black woman.

    Michelle obama sale glitter

    in reply to: setting up the Miami game (MNF) #153150
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, thank goodness. I was beginning to think I was the only Rams fan on this board. I feel like I stepped into some kind of weird Dolphin orgy here.

    That happened to me at Sea World once. I accidentally slipped and fell into their tank.

    For the record, I don’t hear you lamenting that.

    But that’s none of my business.

    in reply to: the election #153149
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    At any rate, I’m pretty disconnected from Dem-Rep politics, though, these days.   So, I dont have a good sense of the exact algebra of why the soul-less Duplicat lost and the Buffoon Replicant won.

    But I am curious.   (In a quirky, doomer, apocalyptic, wry way. )   I like to keep up on mainstream capitalist-pathology and ecocide-culture.  🙂     So, i will read around, the next few weeks, as i did in 2016.    Probly the same exact forces are at play.  Same factions.

    My gut tells me, that Kamala is John Kerry.  She’s Bob Dole.  She’s just got a dull personality that did not excite enough people.   Shallow amerikunz.  Ya know.

    Same. I’m curious, but I can already feel my curiosity starting to fade, though my activity in this thread would testify otherwise. But it’s kind of like replaying a car accident in your head, over and over, just to try to get a handle on it. The damage is done, and the fallout will follow. Trump’s victory is bad news in immediate, substantial ways to vulnerable, marginalized groups. But the Grand Arc of biosphere destruction, of imperial devastation, of a sharpening divide of wealth and power…all that marches on either way, so I find myself more interested in trying to protect my future and my kids, and enjoying myself as much as possible than in reading the news headlines.

    I didn’t watch any coverage on Tuesday. My wife did. I received some Push headlines that suggested the worst was happening, but it wasn’t until I got up yesterday morning that I actually knew for sure. And I was sick for about an hour, and then I started moving into the autopsy, and trying to figure out how I was going to maintain my mental health over the next four years, and the only answer to that is to restrict the amount of news I digest. That feels like a copout of sorts, but it also seems starkly obvious that I can’t do a god damn thing about any of this.

    Leftists often like to say Dems lose because the party moved too far right, and abandoned the working class. (see vid with RD Kelly below) I mean, leftists always say that.   Could be truth to that.  I dunno.  Thats why LEFTISTS didnt like her.  But Clinton won twice by moving right.  Obama won twice by moving right.   I mean, the Dem ecocide-coalition sometimes works.  Sometimes it doesnt.

    And I think there is some truth to the claim that Ds have moved too far to the right. If the Democrats actually strengthened unions and raised the minimum wage, and provided healthcare and family leave and vacation time and workers’ comp and all that, they probably wouldn’t be facing the angry maga people. But I don’t think it’s an Intellectual, principled choice on the part of voters. Seems to me that the truism that it always comes down to the economy is accurate. The price of eggs, milk, and rent have gone up a lot, and people are feeling squeezed. That’s it. They aren’t thinking about Fed policy and interest rates and any of that. Since neither party is doing a damn thing to reverse those trends – and, in fact, seem united in believing that the working class should experience a little MORE insecurity – they turn to other factors. And for a lot of those people, the next thing on the list is hating the scapegoat for their economic insecurity, and here we are. That gets turned into resentment against lgbtq and immigrants and racial minorities and religious minorities and a bunch of stuff that wouldn’t really feel threatening IF they had enough money to prosper and retire etc. But when you are struggling financially, everything becomes a threat.

    Anyway. We’re screwed. Enjoy your evening.

    in reply to: the election #153142
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, one other thing. I think Nader is right about Vance. I think THAT is the guy Peter Thiel actually wants as president.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 11/6 – 11/7 #153140
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator
    roberto clemente@rclemente2121
    pff / week 9 centers:
    out of 31 qualifying centers, limmer ranked:
    #6 overall
    #4 pass pro
    #9 run blocking

    That’s ridiculous.

    This front office should not be fired.

    in reply to: injuries & roster issues for week 10/game 9 #153139
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I would rather have Limmer remain at centre and have Avila play LG. Jackson can back up at all 3 interior positions. Probably not going to happen given the money they gave to Jackson.

    I’m think that same way, though that is only my eyeballs at work, and I’m not a great observer of OL play.

    Hey, where’s RFL?

    in reply to: setting up the Miami game (MNF) #153138
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am in favor of the Rams dominating and obliterating the Dolphins. I vote for that. w v

    Oh, thank goodness. I was beginning to think I was the only Rams fan on this board. I feel like I stepped into some kind of weird Dolphin orgy here.

    in reply to: the election #153136
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Bernie’s got a vid where he solemnly, calmly states he ‘disagrees’ with Kamala’s Israel policy, etc. I watched it and thought, what if a Nazi politician had done a vid where he ‘disagreed’ with killing all the commies and jews. ‘Disagreed’.     Jeezus.

    I see a lot of voices (tweeter) on the left trying to make out that Harris lost bc of Gaza, and…you know…that’s not it.

    One thing I’ve noticed in my life is that few people get upset at the suffering and deaths of people they do not know personally. Is that a Leftist thing? I’ll have to ponder that.

    in reply to: the election #153130
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Jordan
    @JordanChariton
    3h • 17 tweets • 4 min read • Read on X
    🧵MAJOR takeaway ignored by Dems in losing to Trump twice in 8 years:

    Combined Millennial/Gen Z turnout—age 18-44—declined by 7% from 2016 (44% of voters) to 2024 (37% of voters). This was age group @BernieSanders won & galvanized—but Dems & media took him out by the knees.


    @BernieSanders 2016 (Bernie wave)

    18-44
    44% of voters

    18-29
    19% of voters
    Image
    @BernieSanders 2020

    18-44
    40% of voters
    (4 point turnout drop vs 2016)

    18-29
    17% of voters
    (2 point turnout drop by 2016)

    ***Lots of young voters felt Dems came together to stop Bernie from winning Dem primary
    Image
    @BernieSanders 2024

    18-44
    37% of voters
    (3 point turnout drop vs 2020)
    (7 point turnout drop vs 2016)

    18-29
    14% of voters
    (3 point turnout drop vs 2020)
    (5 point turnout drop by 2016)

    ***Millions of young voters disgusted by Gaza genocide, buried by student loans, deflated in post-Bernie era
    Image
    @BernieSanders There’s never 1 singular reason a presidential candidate wins or loses an election—but Dems shrinking in youth turnout by 7 points in eight years is significant. The reality is the corrupt elites running the party truly thought if they just put forward Taylor Swift and Beyonce…
    @BernieSanders Mixed with “cute” “cool” TikTok videos, that would sway the youth. But young people are not stupid and didn’t support @BernieSanders because he was cool or had celebrity support: they supported him because he was the only one offering them a bold economic reprieve from this…
    @BernieSanders New Gilded Age young people are living in. Millennials grew into adulthood while simultaneously being CRUSHED by post 9/11 economic downturn, 2008 financial crash, growing shit-job/job-less/gig-job economy, and as student loan debt slaves…
    @BernieSanders Gen Z has mostly had to grow into adulthood in the same growing shit-job/job-less/gig-job economy with the sour cherry on top of the COVID economic collapse…
    @BernieSanders In 2020, Millennials/Gen Z in large part held their nose & voted for Biden because they wanted to stop Trump (and I believe bc of Bernie’s strong endorsement of Biden). BUT they were also promised:
    ✅$15 min wage
    ✅Public Option
    ✅Aggressive climate policy
    ✅$2K checks

    ….
    @BernieSanders But they got:
    🛑$15 min wage (the parliamentarian!)
    🛑Public Option (Biden never uttered it again after election)
    🛑Aggressive climate policy (Biden doubled public land drilling)
    🛑$1,400 check
    🛑Small loan cancellation blocked by Supreme Courty
    @BernieSanders Now, you can argue “well it’s more than they would have gotten from Trump!”…

    But if you are young, haven’t had the economic opportunities that Boomers/Gen X had, and have a hopeless economic future, “the other guy is worse” eventually…

    Falls on deaf ears.
    @BernieSanders When you add in something young people across the country have repeatedly told me since 2016—”why the hell are we spending all this money across the world while ignoring here”—all of this is a recipe for disaster for Democrats…
    @BernieSanders This is not meant to relitigate the whole “Bernie was screwed in 2016 & 2020” argument (but he was). This is to show clearly by the data…turnout among age 50 and under inched toward half the electorate in 2016 when Bernie galvanized the youth—and has dramatically shrunk…
    @BernieSanders over eight years since then as the Dem Party blamed Russia for their defeat, moved further right, offered SHORT-TERM economic relief during a deadly pandemic that they allowed to quickly expire, and abandoned the few economic promises they made…
    @BernieSanders The takeaway: offering neoliberal crumbs like tax credits, grants, help w/ home down payments (when Wall Street is still allowed to buy up all the housing and double the price)…is not enough for a younger generation with little economic hope, no savings, and buried in debt.
    @BernieSanders Maybe instead of listening to their donors and crushing the most popular politician— beloved and energized young people—they should start embracing his politics and putting forth his proposals to win back working class voters of all colors and ages…
    @BernieSanders Better chance I develop six-pack abs by Thanksgiving.

    in reply to: the election #153129
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Ralph on the Dems.

    Well…yeah. He’s right about all that, but it seems to me that he overlooks the pretty clear fact that the Democrats want absolutely no part of that agenda. They know what programs are popular among voters. They also know they are unpopular with their donors. They would rather ignore those programs and lose elections than work to pass those programs and lose their donors. Their actions make it crystal clear that have no interest in helping the riff raff. Harris toured with Liz Cheney, promised fracking, and refused to make ANY of the criticisms of society that Nader listed.

    in reply to: the election #153126
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I dont have much respect for Bernie anymore (‘my friend Joe’ etc) but he did at least say some useful things to his buddies in the Ecocide-Party.  (and i hate TYT, btw, fwiw)

    Yeah…I saw Bernie’s statement both on twitter and facebook yesterday, and I didn’t read it. I did watch the video you brought here, and I guess I’m glad he’s found his voice again, now that the bargain he made is at an end, but it feels like too little, too late. His capitulation to the party went exactly the way we all expected it would. He gave up his voice in exchange for a committee seat that got a few things passed that will be a little bit of help to a few people. That was the deal. It wasn’t enough, and now we have Trump again.

    in reply to: the election #153123
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am not seeing much on any of this whole issue that is useful from these groups:

    Trumpsters

    we hate the dems style leftists

    mainstream-news type dems

    As a leftist myself, I am a little dismayed that #2 in that list is not proving to be that useful. Anyway. The best arguments I have seen so far, and that hold up, are the more “less noise more analysis” types who point out that in both 2020 and 2024, how the economy was perceived drove turnout and drove the elections.

    I’m not following what you are saying here. Are you talking about critiques of the election?

    As for the “detailed arguments,” I have to take your word for it because I didn’t see any. However, I didn’t really look. I didn’t watch the convention, I didn’t see/listen to any TV ads, or put any effort into finding her message. I didn’t hear anything about raising the minimum wage, strengthening bargaining power of unions, healthcare, or anything, really. Just stuff like “Biden is the most progressive president in history, blah, blah, blah.” So I guess I wasn’t a responsible citizen this time. But I’m really only interested in what politicians actually DO, not what they say/imply they will do, so….

    in reply to: the election #153110
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, yes, we have the ability to ruin things for us and the majority of the creatures most similar to us, but as Stephen J Gould pointed out, we couldn’t destroy all life on Earth even if we wanted to.  Life (even higher life forms) have survived global catastrophes greater than we can bring about.  We are here indirectly as a result of the last one.  And ultimately, our efforts would destroy us before we could exterminate everything else.

    Well, my son tells me that we are pretty close to killing all the plankton that live in the ocean, and that the plankton produces far more oxygen than the rainforests do, and when the plankton goes, everything above it on the food chain goes.

    I think if we get down to plankton level, Stephen J Gould’s contributions to science won’t matter much to anything left.

    in reply to: the election #153108
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Though that’s not what I said. Or it’s not quite it. The election had to do with the money guys funding the message to the lower rung base, and the message had to do with the usual anxieties and moral panics about migrants, race, sexuality, and etc. plus believing that price gouging was inflation. Don’t account for that, and you don’t account for this election. It’s this, to sum it all up in one joke:

    My argument is that it wasn’t so much the power of the money guys’ message about immigrants etc. as it was apathy towards Harris’ non-message.

    I think it is both…but the fact that Trump’s vote total is more or less the same, and Harris’ vote total is WAAAAAAAAAY down from Biden’s  suggests that it had more to do with her than him. Basically.

    in reply to: the election #153092
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So YOU’RE why Trump won. I agree.  I don’t know how you fight the system when it has so much influence and power over every aspect of daily life. This has to be unprecedented.  No society in history has been under this much control while not realizing they are under control. Like you, what bothers me the most is the effect this is having on the environment.  Propelling  the “6th Extinction”.   However, I get some relief knowing humans will be dead before the planet is.  Earth will get the last laugh

    I dunno what you mean by “the planet.” I think in 100 years, give or take a coupla decades, the only living thing on this planet will be those freaky things that live on the bottom of the ocean along the volcanic vents. We are headed for a hard reset.

    And I think wv is right. There is absolutely no chance of fixing this. Sociopathic greed monsters control “reality,” and you can’t argue people out of their realities. It doesn’t matter how much evidence you have. From time-to-time somebody will “get it,” and see what’s happening, but there is no chance whatsoever of changing the system. At least not until it collapses of its own accord, and that will happen, but it will be environmental collapse that makes the system go belly up, and there’s nothing left to do at that point but write epitaphs anyway.

    Trump’s victory brings some unnecessary suffering into the equation earlier, and pointlessly. But the window began to shut somewhere in the 60s, and slammed shut when Clinton sold the Democrat party to Wall St.

     

    in reply to: the election #153084
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    How Trump won the election

    Jason Hickel

    All the takes about Trump winning the US election are correct and yet they also miss the point.

    Yes, it was insane for the Democrats to think they could win by running a soulless candidate, without a shred of progressive policy vision, pursuing endorsements from neocon war-hawks everybody hates, while arming and funding a genocide, and belittling and crushing those who have enough morality to protest it. It is enraging that the Democrats are so smug and blind to this.

    But these are all just symptoms. The deeper reality is that liberalism has failed, liberalism is dead, and people urgently need to wake up to this fact and respond accordingly.

    Progressive

    It is a defunct ideology that cannot offer any meaningful solutions to our social and ecological crises and it must be abandoned.

    Democrats have proven over and over again that they cannot accept even basic steps like public healthcare, affordable housing, and a public job guarantee – things that would dramatically improve the material, social and political conditions of the working classes.

    And they cannot accept a public finance strategy that would steer production away from fossil fuels and toward green transition to give us a shot at a liveable future.

    Why? Because these things run against the objectives of capital accumulation. And for liberals capital is sacrosanct.

    They will do whatever it takes to ensure elite accumulation, it is their only consistent commitment.  At home, they suppress and demonise progressive and socialist tendencies.

    Risk

    Abroad, they engage in endless wars and violence to suppress input prices in the global South and prevent any possibility of sovereign economic development.

    The Democrats have done all this purposefully and knowingly, for my whole life, not as some kind of ‘mistake’ but in full consciousness that it is in the interests of capital.

    And because liberalism cannot address our crises, and because it crushes socialist alternatives, it inevitably paves the way for right-wing populism.

    They know this pattern, and yet they risk it every time – this election being only the most recent example.

    Formidable

    They did it in 2016, when they actively crushed the Sanders campaign and sent Trump to the White House. They do it because ultimately they – and I mean the liberal ruling class here – don’t really mind if fascists take power, so long as the latter too ensure the conditions for capital accumulation.

    They 100 per cent prefer this to the possibility of a socialist alternative. So, progressives have to face reality. The dream of “converting” the Democratic party is dead.

    This is now a fact and it must be accepted. The only option is to build a mass-based movement that can reclaim the working classes and mobilize a political vehicle that can integrate disparate progressive struggles into a unified and formidable political force and achieve substantive transformation.

    This will take real work, actual organizing, but it must be done and that process must begin now.

    This Author

    Jason Hickel is a professor at ICTA-UAB and visiting senior fellow at the LSE, London. He is author of The Divide and Less Is More. He writes about global inequality, political economy and ecological economics. This commentary first appeared at X.com where Jason uses the handle @jasonhickel.org

    • This reply was modified 3 months, 2 weeks ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: the election #153083
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    This is not an issue of the left not being heard, this is an issue of the right getting a very regressive message out to its base, while being backed by big money that has been promised huge gifts in the form of tax relief and drilling rights etc. So it’s a combination of the rich oligarchy getting even more of what it wants than ever before–and I mean by huge big preposterous bunches more–and prejudiced Magas saving their kids from migrants turning them trans (the latter joke captures a real point). Among the things threatened? Besides the environment. Social security, FEMA, education, women’s reproductive rights, the safety net and assistance out of poverty…. it goes on and on. This is the worst in our lifetimes. By far. Make no mistake.

    I dunno. While I agree that things are going to get far, far worse, and this is basically the death of the “American dream” of living in prosperity and freedom, the fact that the oligarchy financed this heavily doesn’t account for the voting patterns. It is also true, for example, to say that the oligarchy financed Harris. They were kind of in a win-win situation as a class, though specific billionaires backed the MAGA agenda, and some backed Harris.

    So here’s something I’m thinking about: Trump apparently has drawn FEWER votes this election than he did in 2020. He actually performed worse than the last time he ran. Not by a lot; it’s basically a push. So now I’m looking squarely at the fact that Harris got ~15M fewer votes than Biden did. Trump didn’t gain in popularity. Harris was a drop-off from Biden. A huge drop-off.

    Why?

    Well, it’s complex, and there are undoubtedly several factors.

    But it seems apparent that, once again, the Democrats relied mostly on the argument that Trump is terrible. Which has the virtue of being true. But also isn’t enough on its own. And I say that having just made the prediction a few hours ago that it WOULD be enough, that women in particular were bound to vote against the regressive, misogynistic policies that are unfolding.

    Harris ran on “Joy!” And secondarily, she ran on being a Republican. Bragged about Republican endorsements, including those of Liz and Dick Cheney, a war criminal. And promised to take advice from Republicans, and even find a place in her cabinet for a Republican. In the mean time, she also forcefully backed war criminal Netanyahu, and said nothing about specific policies. She deliberately ran on vague generalizations about “economic opportunities.” And apart from her saying she would continue to back Israel and fracking, I don’t know a single thing that she said she would fight for. On abortion rights, she said that if a bill came to her, she would sign it. She didn’t promise to lead the fight, or make it a priority.

    Basically, she presented nothing except the absence of MAGA as a platform and some feel-good vibes.

    And I think the way she came to be the nominee was unhelpful. Voters didn’t choose her. She was the nominee by default. I think all of this added up to a good deal of apathy about her as a candidate, and it appears that there wasn’t enough fear of Trump to put her over the top.

    in reply to: the election #153075
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Welp. I clearly do not have the pulse of this country. I don’t know what just happened. I thought 2020 showed that a majority of Americans simply did not want Trump in the White House a second longer, and it didn’t matter that the Democrats put up a flaccid candidate. I thought it was a rejection of Trump. I dunno.

    Maybe this explains it. Maybe not.

Viewing 30 posts - 211 through 240 (of 7,208 total)