Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,681 through 1,710 (of 8,001 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 10/3 – 10/4 #145901
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    But in addition to that, you combine his arm and his accuracy and you get all of these lasers to the middle of the field we’ve been seeing. I’ve never seen a Rams qb own the medium range pass to the middle of the field the way he does.

    Well, I think i agree. Kurt may have some advantages over Stafford in some other areas, but I dont think even Kurt could do the ‘laser over the middle in tight windows’ at the same level Stafford does it. w v

    Yes. Matthew Stafford is a good quarterback.

    in reply to: highlights, plays, & breakdowns…Colts game #145868
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think that Donald has a legit shot at the Hall of Fame if he can keep up this level of play for another 10 years.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 10/3 – 10/4 #145866
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Derion Kendrick was targeted twice and did not allow a single completion against the Colts

    Yet he has famous haters in the chat room.

    {insouciant whistling}

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 10/2 – 10/3 #145865
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    A lot more than a “bit”, but you always did hate Todd Gurley so I’m not surprised you took a shot at him when the opportunity arose.

    So sue me if I don’t think Gurley is an appropriate name for a football player.

    Knute Rockne.

    That’s a football name.

    Lose me with the Gurl.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 10/2 – 10/3 #145857
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    They do the Rams at 25:07 & 31:59

    Williams as the second coming of Gurley is overstating things a bit.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 10/2 – 10/3 #145834
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Wow. Just blew my own mind with that post.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 10/2 – 10/3 #145832
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Imagine if the Rams had drafted Stafford in 2009 instead of Bradford in 2010.

    in reply to: Four games in….musing about a wildcard game #145817
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #145814
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: reactions to the Colts game #145813
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    And we’re saying that–as in, we’re quite rightly saying that–after just 4 games.

    Usually you can’t really judge a draft for a couple of years.

    Yes. This is not Beginner’s Luck. What Nacua and Avila are doing is the real deal. They look every bit like future All-Pros. There are a couple of other guys that are showing “age-appropriate” promise. I mean…they look about like what you hope for from their draft position at this point. Meaning that they are on the road to being draft “hits” as opposed to draft “misses.”

    I hope Young develops. It’s rare for an Edge to produce in his rookie year. He seems to be doing okay. But he isn’t an Impact player. Somebody else said it in a different thread: the Rams need an Edge to make them truly threatening. Increased pressure on the opposing QB is the one improvement in the Ram’s game that would make the biggest difference for this team, and if all this draft (combined with last year’s) fills out the roster with quality players everywhere, the Rams will pick up the missing piece(s) before next season.

    McSnead’s team-building strategy looks like it is ahead of schedule to me, and that is good news in Ramsville.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 10/2 – 10/3 #145811
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 10/2 – 10/3 #145810
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Kupp: injury setback #145809
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: reactions to the Colts game #145788
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Of all the Rams teams that I had no expectations of, this might be my favourite ever. Love the young guys. Love Stafford. Great to see a 100 yard rusher again. Williams is a TD machine inside the ten. A fun, fun win.

    That’s an interesting comment. If this team has a rival in this regard, it’s ’99. So it’s been a long, long time since I had a team exceed expectations as much as this team has. I thought they would be better than everyone was saying, but this team is giving glimpses of playoff potential. I was hoping for .500.

    Like Nittany said, there’s a lot of talent. More than I hoped for with so many youngsters in the starting lineup. This is an all-time great draft, by the looks of it. Nacua and Avila are off the charts for rookies, and they’re getting help from Young, Turner, and some of the 2nd year guys.

    They are ahead of schedule in their refurbishment, that is certain.

    Today’s weakness seems to be penalties. I haven’t looked at the stats yet, but it sure seemed to be a problem.

    Welp. This is going to be an exciting season, not just an interesting one, looks like.

    Let’s catch Philly by surprise next week.

    in reply to: Injuries going into game 4 #145754
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Didn’t Anchrum fill in for Noteboom while he was out Monday? Why Dotson?

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #145749
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/26 – 9/27 #145739
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Facemasks when men were men, and not little girls.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/26 – 9/27 #145715
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator
    HoldenCantor@HoldenCantor
    Les Snead on the Coach McVay show just now on Noteboom and Alaric: “All the news we got back is good news, now it’s just rest and recovery on a short week and I think we can get that done” Looks like we’re gonna be okay up front

    That’s a good thing.

    in reply to: reactions to the Rams @Bengals game #145682
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Sunday Ticket is an add-on.

    It’s also a Stand Alone. I bought the Sunday Ticket (for about $250 during the Spring “sale” period), but I don’t have the basic YouTube tv streaming service. Maybe I would get ESPN if I did? I dunno.

    So far I haven’t used my YouTube subscription, so I’m not going to resubscribe next year at full price.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #145678
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: reactions to the Rams @Bengals game #145677
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think Cincy is a very talented team, despite their record, and they wanted it bad.

    I agree with that. Cincy is a very good team, and they needed this game in a bad way. They were bound to come out laser-focused, and nobody on that team was going to relax and take a down off. They gave it everything they had, and they won.

    And even so, the Rams had the upper hand until Jackson went AWOL.

    in reply to: reactions to the Rams @Bengals game #145676
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Zooey, I agree about all those streaming services. Far too many. Twas, basically, a bait and switch for consumers. Since you went with Youtube, did you also go for the Sunday Ticket? As an East Coaster, without the Ticket, I’m back to the bad old days of seeing the Rams, perhaps, four games a year. When they’re a contender, it’s more, of course. NFL Gamepass seems to have raised their prices. Hoping they discount soon for a partial season. Despite the likelihood of a tough year, I’d like to see the Rams more than a few more times in 2023 . . .

     I am under the impression that YouTube IS Sunday Ticket now. I don’t know what Gamepass is. I don’t know what anything is. I’ve always watched over local broadcasts, or streamed it from Moldovia, or something. I hate this. When I was a kid, I used to pull in 3 different stations that would broadcast games, and they had local control, meaning that different stations in the same network did not necessarily show the same game. It was up to the local station. So I saw the Rams every week. And there were still plenty of commercials, and I believe everyone involved still got fed.

    But now, you know, you’ve got Kirk Freaking Cousins pulling in $40 million/year, so that money has to come from somewhere. All of which you know. Everybody knows. And I hate it. I wish games were pay-per-view, I guess. And that’s not a sentence I ever would have said at any time in the past 40 years, but this sucks.

    in reply to: reactions to the Rams @Bengals game #145671
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    We knew the season would be up and down, but self-inflicted wounds shouldn’t be the reason for a loss.

    Seems to me, on the contrary, that the youngest team in football will lose that way more often than not.

    But this one felt more like actual wounds (Jackson). Losing Jackson changed the game (whenever that happened). The Rams won the first quarter, and the defense was solid throughout. Although Cincy won the TOP and ran 22 more plays than LA did, they scored only 19 points, and they got some lucky bounces.

    Their defense (Cincy’s) deserves credit. They played well; they took advantage of Jackson’s injury, and they got more aggressive once there was blood in the water. I don’t understand why Noteboom didn’t take over at LOT (who did, btw? I never saw the guy, and the announcers didn’t seem to think it was important).

    I hope Jackson is not seriously hurt.

    (And SCREW this sh!t about needing to subscribe to 6 different streaming services in order to watch football! This is such BS. I actually broke down and bought youtube this year, and so far, it’s been of no use to me the first 3 weeks).

    in reply to: reactions to the Rams @Bengals game #145667
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    This looks about right:

    in reply to: Nacua #145644
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Just did a quick search to see what draft reports were like on Nacua, and the one thing that came up consistently is his tendency to miss a lot of games due to injury. Quite a few comments about his tenacity, and YAC.

    in reply to: Turner #145643
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Fixt it!

    Thanks.

    I see a bunch of active links in there. I thought those screwed up everything, so I’ve been removing them from my posts. Is that glitch fixed, or is this just your magic admin powers?

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/21 – 9/23 #145626
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I hated that uniform change when it came out.

    I still prefer the blue and whites, but I would take that 50-year old uniform over anything they’ve worn in the past 20 years.

    in reply to: setting up the Bengals game (us, reporters, tweets, etc.) #145625
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i’m hoping the rams just blow the bengals out of the water.

    I agree that this would be for the best, all things considered.

    in reply to: stats (before game 3) #145613
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I wonder if the Rams have “gone away from tendencies.” What with the different approach to the running game on offense, I am curious if their early success is “real,” or if defenses will catch up with the Rams once there is more film on the season.

    in reply to: setting up the Bengals game (us, reporters, tweets, etc.) #145591
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    BENGALS FAN: I’m going over to check out the Rams board. I bet those guys are talking all kinds of smack about the Bengals!

    RAMS FANS: San Diego sports teams sure do suck, man. And they’re ugly.

Viewing 30 posts - 1,681 through 1,710 (of 8,001 total)