Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 7,171 through 7,200 (of 7,911 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mack, belated HAPPY BIRTHDAY #33556
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Happy Happy Birthday!

    in reply to: Prediction thread – Minnesota Vikings – out of doors #33555
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    ????? This is the game that the Vikes look back on and…??????

    I thought it was too obvious to state.

    This is the game that the Vikings look back on and wonder why they even got out of bed in the morning.

    in reply to: 49ers vs Rams: posts about the game #33372
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Not really, but maybe a little like Bo Jackson.

    w
    v

    People all over the place, in the media and on fan boards, are having trouble comparing TG to anyone. To me that’s because he has some very unique qualities that we’re having some trouble (and fun) putting our (collective) finger on.

    One key attribute: it;s a combo of things. He has very good lower body strength BUT is also very smooth in his lower body movements, to the point where sometimes you don’t notice he actually did anything. It is all very subtle. In fact we don’t really get the right camera angles to see the real effect IMO. This is combined with very good vision and “contact balance.” So the effect of him running on his big plays is that it just looks like the defenders didn’t tackle him right or took the wrong angle etc. He doesn’t run over guys, it’s like he runs through defenders who LOOK like they aren’t playing it right. Meanwhile of course it’s not the defenders it’s him.

    I think I agree with everything here. I hadn’t thought of Bo Jackson. That may be the best straight comparison I’ve considered, but then I agree with what zn wrote here, and I don’t think Jackson had that quality. You can just see Gurley do this…thing…where he just makes guys miss, and it certainly isn’t the juking and spinning thing like Sanders, or the high-stepping like Payton. It’s like he jukes while continuing straight. He’s there, but he isn’t. It’s like he’s all greased up, or something. He just squirts through guys, as opposed to bowling them over. The guys is just a fish that nobody can get a good grip on. He will get 3 yards, then run into a wall, then suddenly…thwwwwt…he squirts forward and picks up 5 more yards in a dive.

    I don’t know.

    I do know that I love watching this guy play football, and I am glad glad glad he is on the Rams.

    in reply to: what ails the passing game? #33370
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, I do not value Foles highly. Didn’t see anything in pre-season that made me a fan, and he has shown me no progress through the first half of the season. I just see a lot of 3 yard passes, with an occasional deep throw, and a lot of inaccuracy. I’d like to see more over the middle, too, and as both CoachO and Bernie point out, Quick and Britt seem like guys who could run slants.

    But the WRs aren’t winning me over, either. It’s not like I see lots of wide open guys Foles isn’t throwing to, and today Foles seemed to drop a deep pass right into Britt’s bread basket that he just dropped. They didn’t show a replay, so I dunno, but that looked to be all on Britt.

    But these WRs and Foles aren’t even doing a MEDIOCRE job.

    This offense has got to get its act together, and RISE TO MEDIOCRITY!!!

    in reply to: Prediction thread – Minnesota Vikings – out of doors #33358
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t think that game will “tell us” anything. If they win, they could still lose against top teams like the Bengals. If they lose, they could still upset a top team like the Bengals.

    I agree with that.

    What a win probably WOULD tell us, though, is that the Rams are playing with more consistency.

    But…I tell ya…Foles got about 125 yards passing against one of the crappier teams (plus 66 yards on a 0 yard pass to Austin).

    The Rams have a couple of playmakers (Austin, Gurley), an emerging OL, and nothing else. Britt, Bailey, and Quick combined for 1 reception for 5 yards. And Cook made monthly guest appearance. I don’t understand it, but this offense is going to the end of the Rams season sooner or later.

    in reply to: Prediction Thread – The Francisco 49ers #33298
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I never said “Playoffs or bums” myself

    That’s just me playfully running around with a premise. The danger of that is coming across as a judge of others’s expectations, though the truth is, I wasn’t aiming at anything more heavy than a nice chuckle. Either way, let a thousand flowers bloom.

    A loss today would be disappointing. And I think they have a winning streak in them. But, my own hesitation is, with a junior varsity OL, it’s hard to be consistent.

    .

    No, I know you were using Silly Putty to sculpt those perspectives. I didn’t see your post as a serious attempt at the Evolution of Rams’ Fans Perspectives in the 21st Century.

    Anyway. We all know the Rams are capable of losing to an inferior team.

    And we all hope they don’t. And we all would welcome a win streak that a better-than-average team should put together.

    in reply to: Prediction Thread – The Francisco 49ers #33290
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I never said “Playoffs or bums” myself. I have said they should be in the playoff hunt in December or they’re bums. Or something along those lines. I think it’s time they played with the post-season on the line.

    And it seems to me that they oughta win today, next week over the Vikes, and the Bears after that. They Oughta.

    in reply to: what some SF fans are saying #33190
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Mine is not to question why.

    If he is awful, that’s good enough for me.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    “Super Bowl oriented.”

    I’m not sure exactly what that means, but it sounds like a compliment.

    in reply to: Tweets 10/27 – Ogletree goes on IR #33107
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Released Dunbar?

    Well, I guess the Rams are pretty happy with Barron.

    in reply to: reporters salute the BROWNS game #33045
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am pleased to see multiple reports praising Austin’s blocking.

    in reply to: Projected Probowlers #33043
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Probowlers…Gurley, Donald, Quinn, Jenkins and maybe Hekker.

    Gurley and Donald will be All-Pros

    What? No love for Napoleon Kaufman?

    What kind of Raiders fan are you?

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Gurley.

    I cannot believe what I am reading, and what I am seeing about this guy. Honestly, if you were going to sketch a guy up in Sims Football, this would be your running back.

    in reply to: One step at a time #33037
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Sure, it seems reasonable to expect incremental improvement from the passing game.

    Except that I haven’t seen any.

    I don’t swim in a stats-filled pool, so I can’t back up my impressions with data, but I would say that I think the most impressive Foles performance was the first game against Seattle.

    As I recall, the Rams put together 3 80-yard drives in that game. And, iirc, we haven’t seen anything to match that since.

    In fact, the Rams flat out suck.

    I don’t know what else to conclude from the fact that the Rams are #1, or near the top, in first down yardage, and at, or near, the bottom in 3rd down conversion, and that they just don’t accomplish sustained drives. I mean, remove the Seattle game, and where are the Rams statistically on offense?

    They SUCK, people. The offense SUCKS. You give the Rams a middle-of-the-pack defense, and they are 0-6 right now. Maybe 1-5.

    So, yeah, Foles sometimes makes some great downfield throws. But for every one of those, he throws the ball over the head or behind a receiver 10 – 15 yards away from him 3 times.

    Yeah, and maybe Quick gets better, and maybe Foles gets better, but I’m not seeing the OL as being the big problem here, and it sure as hell isn’t Gurley.

    The Rams can’t pass. They can’t. They can’t make first downs, they can’t control the clock, and they scare nobody in the passing game.

    They can contend. Jared Cook will make a big play now and then between his pulled-short routes, and phantom blocks, and Foles will hit a guy once in a while. But they aren’t going to win when it matters because they can’t.

    Having said that, I am enjoying the season, and I look forward to December, and I hope they get a playoff game.

    But this team needs a QB and a WR.

    in reply to: Prediction Thread – The Francisco 49ers #33035
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think this is the game at which the 49ers will look back, and think, “Why did we even bother to suit up?’

    in reply to: One step at a time #33001
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I agree with you, RFL. I just see the passing O as the team’s biggest deficiency, and believe it will certainly be the reason the season comes to an end when it does.

    We are six games in, and I see no chemistry in the passing game. There is hope, sure. But I haven’t seen anything building yet. Foles has given me nuthin’ I didn’t get from Hill.

    in reply to: Gamebook.pdf vs SF – games 1-16 #32993
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    1 for 9 on 3rd down conversions for the Rams vs Cleveland yesterday….

    almost as bad as SF from last week (1 for 11) vs Seattle.

    Rams are dead last in 3rd down conversions for the season… this scares me.

    It doesn’t bode well, that’s for sure. I am expecting the Rams to contend for a playoff spot this year on the strength of their defense and Todd Gurley, but they are not going to beat good teams who can just focus on slowing Gurley down.

    They need better play from their QB and WRs, and we are six games in right now without any evidence that a passing game is emerging. I am just not seeing any improvement in the Rams’ effectiveness this year. Foles hasn’t distinguished himself from Hill, imo.

    in reply to: that's so Gurley #32975
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Gurley is special.

    He isn’t just off to a rookie hot start that will taper off when teams get film on him. He is the real deal.

    On his long run…Austin cleans out two defenders in a block that gives him the corner. A thing of beauty.

    in reply to: 49ers next week #32956
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Kapernick trained under Warner this past offseason and actually looks worse than ever.

    Could it be that Warner, like any respectable ex-Ram/Cardinal should do, purposely sabotaged the 49ers QB’s career?

    I would think so. And to add to it, he had the pleasure of charging the guy some money, too. Probably laughed himself silly behind Kaepernick’s back.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    My boss is crazy, my wife doesn’t understand me, and my kids don’t appreciate me.

    Sometimes I just wonder what it all means. Ya know?

    in reply to: post-Browns game tweets #32928
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    There were fans unhappy with the Gurley pick.

    I bet most of them have come around.

    in reply to: post-Browns game tweets #32920
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So…you would have to go all the way back to the year before last…is that right?

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.
    in reply to: official Browns game response thread #32917
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I know some posters around here who have been advocating for the draft of a true #1 WR for the last…I dunno. 6 or 8 consecutive drafts.

    in reply to: Let's Make Money #32886
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    You know, I just know nothing about the gold standard issue.

    I will watch this sometime in the next couple of months.

    in reply to: A Bernie article #32885
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I didn’t realize we are spending 5x as much on the military – adjusted for inflation – as we spent at the height of WWII.

    That does give one some pause, does it not?

    I wonder how the political discourse would change if THAT fact was widely known.

    in reply to: Miklasz: It’s Now or Never #32884
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Miklasz to me is not a journalist. He’s a poster who gets paid. And I don’t have a problem with that. Sometimes he’s interesting. And, sure, he is often annoying. But I don’t expect anything more from him after all these years, and that’s just how I approach him. He’s just STLHomer with an Arch avatar. Ya know, cool.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I would like the Eagles to lose a lot. I would prefer it not be Bradford’s fault, though I could live with that, as long as he keeps playing.

    Call me greedy. I want a high second round pick.

    in reply to: A Bernie article #32847
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah. Well. There is that.

    The media is always eager to question the huge expense of some of those 5% wedges, but they have never in my lifetime questioned the single biggest wedge. Ever. It is a complete non-issue.

    Actually, that’s not true. There was a bit of a stink in the 70s over the cost of toilet seats, as I recall. But since Reagan, there hasn’t been a peep on the subject.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    McCown’s in his 13th season?

    I get all these guys confused: McCown, McCoy, Macduff, Macbeth. I thought they all came in the league around three years ago.

    in reply to: Someone's seasons over tonight… #32754
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Wow. Kaepernick has already surpassed 100 yards passing, and there is still more than a full quarter to go!

Viewing 30 posts - 7,171 through 7,200 (of 7,911 total)