Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 7,201 through 7,230 (of 7,999 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Florio: Owners in wait-and-see mode on L.A #35155
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It’s clear he doesn’t want to be in St. Louis.

    I don;’t think that’s a factor at all. There’s no evidence of “St. Louis is not an option.” It just looks like he wants to be this big owner with the fabulous LA property. That doesn’t mean he would not accept St. Louis at all if things didn’t play out for LA.

    I wonder. Because he is clearly “all in” on Los Angeles. Kroenke is accustomed to getting his way, and it would be interesting to see what he will do if the LA move is blocked. The man must have a Plan B. Right now, St. Louis doesn’t look like Plan B, but then, Kroenke is famous for keeping private.

    in reply to: Florio: Owners in wait-and-see mode on L.A #35154
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 39m39 minutes ago
    News on Carson Project: A 200-acre plot some thought would be available for parking/development— Links at Victoria Park — now not available.

    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 38m38 minutes ago
    The #Chargers/#Raiders plan in Carson may now be a bit smaller than some imagined, though the golf course wasn’t in their “core” plan.

    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 37m37 minutes ago
    Carmen Policy, Carson’s advocate, told me: “We have our core piece of land, we don’t need anything else.” To look elsewhere for development

    Maybe. But it doesn’t help. Not in a situation that’s very much up in the air, and owners are going to have to pick up every shard of glass and look at it from every angle to find reasons to back one plan over the other.

    in reply to: Trey Wingo tweets about the Rams 3rd down offense #35153
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Maybe they should not be punting on 4th down. Maybe they should be going for it. Maybe that’s the key. At least that would stop the 3 and out stuff–break the pattern. They’d be on 4 and out and that might give the defense the rest it needs.

    Great plan. Remove Hekker, their best weapon on offense, from the game.

    in reply to: Frederickson: did the Rams let Davis go too soon? #35103
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I doubt it.

    But I sometimes wonder where they would be if they had kept Fitzpatrick.

    in reply to: Does Arizona stand a chance against the Rams? #35083
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The Cardinals will regret having ever HEARD of St. Louis.

    in reply to: interesting, Browns game #34990
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Watching the hapless Browns makes me think: “It could be worse–I could be a Browns fan.”

    I am starting to feel like that is about ALL that Rams fans have these days. At least they aren’t the Browns.

    As I grew up, the Rams were feared and respected. From the late 60s until 1990, the Rams were one of the most respected teams in the league.

    Now – I realize – there are millions of football fans who have think of the Rams as a perpetual doormat to the league, with the exception of the brief candle that was the GSOT.

    I am tired of this shit.

    in reply to: Peter King on the Bengals game and other Rams stuff #34946
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I would give Mannion garbage time duty only at this point. But I would give him that. A possession or two at the end of the game.

    in reply to: How far away is this team ? #34945
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The Rams are a mediocre QB away from contending. I take it for granted that the OL will be better next year. A decent OL and a mediocre passing game is enough to win games with the defense (should it stay pat). That is all the Rams needed this year.

    A #1 WR would help a lot, but the biggest need is a QB who can rate in the upper 80s, low 90s.

    That could be as close as Sean Mannion, and as far away as the final Star Wars film.

    in reply to: Doctors say highschool football should be banned #34870
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Believe me there is money in high school football, too. Not NCAA level money, obviously, but money that matters to high schools.

    in reply to: Tweets 11/29 – Post Game #34869
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i haven’t seen the game yet but will try and watch it sometime this week. it will be painful i’m sure.

    i did see that foles threw an int for td again.

    It was brutal. He was leaving the pocket and threw off balance to a guy who had no Ram anywhere near him. Honestly, Foles appears to me to be on a par with Austin Davis.

    in reply to: Rams vs Bengals : Game Reaction Threat #34868
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I did not know Mannion played. That’s something, if he played acceptably. Of course, Foles played exceptionally once upon a time.

    I saw very little of the game. I saw a couple of slants which was encouraging, and some terrible passes including the pick 6 which was discouraging.

    I am tempted to just fill my Sundays with meaningful activity from this point on because I have just had all I can take of banged up OLs. I have simply OD’d on this shit. But if Mannion is going to get some work, I have interest. I wish I had seen him play today.

    in reply to: Six teams with three wins or less #34866
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I had no idea Foles was this awful.

    The Rams need a QB.

    in reply to: Tweets 11/29 – Post Game #34865
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    They don’t have a QB, and they don’t have a WR who matters. And the OL is on its Bi-annual Shambles Tour.

    I don’t think players blame the head coach for those things the way that fans often do.

    4 weeks ago, there was reason for optimism in the locker room, and it’s all gone to hell. Players and fans are gonna cuss a bit, but I don’t think there’s reason to think Fisher has lost the team.

    in reply to: happy birthday NE Ram #34808
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Happy Birthday, NE.

    in reply to: happy birthday SDRam #34759
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Happy birthday, SD.

    in reply to: Happy Thanksgiving… #34730
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Humbug.

    in reply to: The sudden right wing adoration of the French #34685
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Tweets 11/21 – Kaepernick to IR #34513
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I believe that guarantees him $16 million for next year.

    I would like confirmation on that.

    in reply to: 101, 11/19 … Adam Caplan #34456
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I just don’t think we can expect much with both starting guards out, and the replacements being Reynolds and Donnal.

    All the praise given Wichman means nothing to me. I have heard Noa, Spikes, and I don’t know who all, praised before they were cut. And if Wichman were any good, he would have played instead of Donnal, who got a -10.5 rating (or whatever it was). So I’m not counting on him this year. We have a college OL right now.

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat the Ravens? #34428
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    No. It is all over.

    Go Oakland.

    There. I’ve said it.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Where they were in week 11 since 2008.

    2008: 2-7
    2009: 1-8
    2010: 4-5
    2011: 2-7
    2012: 3-5-1
    2013: 3-6
    2014: 3-6

    ***

    So we are back to the glory days of 2010.

    ————————–

    Zooey, lets say the Rams limp to another
    8-8ish type finish.

    If YOU were the big-boss would you
    bring back Snisher, or would you
    start over? Just curious.

    w
    v

    I don’t know. If I was the big boss, I would have a lot more information than I do sitting here in Podunk, California, hanging out with 17-year olds all day long.

    As a fan, I am inclined to give him another year. There is a lot of talent there. The OL curse, and the problems at QB are painful, but I don’t see how they are Snisher’s fault.

    in reply to: JT on 920 … re: Foles, Keenum #34404
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I expect he will be back. Keenum is going to get killed behind that line before the end of the year, and they will have to put Foles back in.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Where they were in week 11 since 2008.

    2008: 2-7
    2009: 1-8
    2010: 4-5
    2011: 2-7
    2012: 3-5-1
    2013: 3-6
    2014: 3-6

    ***

    So we are back to the glory days of 2010.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Alright, now.

    For awhile here, I thought I was looking at an unfamiliar team.

    Now I recognize my Rams again.

    Practice squad OL and backup QBs.

    in reply to: Bernie thinks Kroenke keeps Fisher around because he loses… #34239
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Bernie is a fan with facepaint.

    Which is fine. But that’s what he is.

    in reply to: QB Change #34236
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    We will rally around Case Keenum, and we will play good football.

    in reply to: QB Change #34233
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000581729/article/rams-name-case-keenum-starting-qb-vs-ravens

    Go to the link above if you want to see a video of Fisher’s announcement. He looks like he is announcing the death of his gramma.

    Case Keenum to start for Rams; Nick Foles benched

    By Gregg Rosenthal
    Around The NFL Editor
    Published: Nov. 16, 2015 at 06:06 p.m. Updated: Nov. 16, 2015 at 06:43 p.m.
    Three months after giving Nick Foles a three-year contract, the St. Louis Rams have decided to bench him.

    Rams coach Jeff Fisher announced that Case Keenum will start at quarterback for the Rams at Baltimore this week. Foles has been removed as a starter after two straight losses by the 4-5 Rams.

    “You know, Nick just needs a break,” Fisher said. “Nick just needs a break right now.”

    Foles was acquired in a March trade between teams dealing starting quarterbacks when the Rams sent Sam Bradford to the Philadelphia Eagles for Nick Foles, a 2016 second-round pick and a move up in the middle rounds of last year’s draft. The pick is nice, but this benching is tantamount to admitting defeat in the deal. The Rams’ long-term contract doesn’t include true guaranteed money after this season, so the Rams can move on from Foles if they chose to. It would be a surprise at this point if Foles was even on the roster next year.

    The timing of this move still is stunning. Keenum, who went undrafted out of college, has started 10 games in four seasons. All of those starts were with the Texans, although Keenum did spend time with the Rams and Texans last season. He’s been Foles’ backup throughout this season.

    Every game, all season

    Fisher said his offense needs a spark, which is clear to see. Foles has seven touchdowns, six interceptions and five fumbles. The Rams have very few sustainable features on offense. Their only success comes from Tavon Austin gadget plays and big runs by rookie Todd Gurley. Foles has a big arm and has connected on the occasional deep ball this season, but he has played particularly poorly over the last month.

    Foles was 0-12 on passes thrown over 10 yards Sunday, which was the most attempts on such passes without a completion in the last 10 seasons, according to the Rams’ website. Fisher wasn’t making any promises about how long Keenum would start, but he clearly has the chance to keep the job. St. Louis has a playoff-ready defense, but plenty of challenging games remaining against Cincinnati, Arizona, and Seattle.

    Foles might very well get another chance to start at quarterback for the Rams, but Fisher probably hopes it’s not necessary. The Rams are letting their Case Keenum flag fly.

    in reply to: reporters violently blast the BEARS game #34230
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Okay, I’ve read a ton of Robinson-bashing for the holding calls.

    I didn’t see the first one, but the second one looked completely bogus to me, and the third one was pretty freaking marginal. That third one gets overlooked more often than it is called, imo. It was one of those nanosecond deals that didn’t even affect the play.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I though that when I read it. Scouts aren’t freelance contractors.

    Sounds like a high school football coach who got asked about one of his players a year or two ago.

    in reply to: Fisher post game #34182
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, Foles is inaccurate. Over nine games now. It isn’t just a bad game here and there. This appears to be who he is. Inaccurate. Low, behind, high, out of bounds. He doesn’t lead receivers open enough. I think I’ve said “nice pass” maybe four times this year with him, and I wince at his accuracy that often every half.

    And he often gets too much loft on his deeper throws.

    That is not balanced by “making plays.” I don’t see him “make” plays.

    I think he is worse than his statistics which look better because 80% of his targets seem to be within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage. (That’s an eyeball statistic).

    Keenum isn’t the answer, and Mannion is even ready to be tested yet. So…shit.

    Honestly, I’d rather have Jaime Martin right now.

    How can the Rams have Waterfield and Van Brocklin at the same time, Warner, Bulger, and Green overlapping, and spend so many, many years in total QB drought?

Viewing 30 posts - 7,201 through 7,230 (of 7,999 total)