Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 24, 2017 at 9:53 pm in reply to: Senate vote allows hibernating bears and cubs to be hunted in their dens #66653
ZooeyModeratorI don’t get how it is even pleasurable. I would have thought that the pleasure of hunting would be in the hunt. The stalking. The effecting a terrific shot at a moving target.
Walking up to a hibernating bear and its cubs, and slaughtering them in their sleep…wtf?
March 24, 2017 at 3:42 pm in reply to: Senate vote allows hibernating bears and cubs to be hunted in their dens #66642
ZooeyModeratorWTF is wrong with people?
ZooeyModeratorLooks to me like Republicans are Damned if They Do, Damned if They Don’t.
If they don’t pass this, there will be finger-pointing, and skepticism that they can unite on anything.
If they do pass it, millions of people will be hurt by it. It will be low-hanging fruit for Democrats in 2018 and 2020. Of course, Democrats are too incompetent to pick all of it, but some of it will harvested.
ZooeyModeratorIt is awesome how our culture has made patriotism inseparable from blind loyalty to the military. The National Anthem, of course, is about the country, not the military, and as others have pointed out, he specifically stated his protest had nothing to do with the military, and pointed out that he has servicemen in his family. But. Some people cannot do complex ideas.
ZooeyModeratorSo Kapernick just donated $50,000 to Meals on Wheels, and Sarah Palin tweeted, “And he wonders why he can’t find a job!”
ZooeyModeratorAnd I can’t help but wonder, if the 9ers had the best record in the league, if they wouldn’t have gone ahead and watched them while complaining about Kapernick.
People compromise with stuff they don’t like all the time if it gets them to a larger goal.
When that compromise is not going to get you to your goal, it is a lot easier to make that point of compromise the “straw” that broke the camel’s back.
===========
Yup. The Steeler fans hate big ben…but they love big ben. If ya know what i mean.w
vWe are doomed.
“We are what we always were in Salem, but now the little crazy children are jangling the keys of the kingdom, and common vengeance writes the law!”
That is from The Crucible, by Arthur Miller. A great play. It’s about something else. But I want it to be about this. “We are what we always were in Salem….”
Humans. At best, we’re hypocrites. At worst, well….
ZooeyModeratorI have no idea, but my wild-speculation iz — its mostly just that player evaluation experts think he’s no longer a decent QB.
Teams seem to have figured him out, and he wasn’t able to adjust.
If Tom Brady or Russell Wilson joined the Black Panthers and burned the American Flag on Oprah, i think teams would still sign them.
But if a mediocre or role player did the same thing — then yeah, the powers-that-be might make an ‘example’ of em.
Kapernik just aint a bigtime talent anymore. I wouldnt want him. And i love running QBsw
vI think that is the truth.
Both my father and my father-in-law cited Kapernick as the reason they didn’t watch the 49ers this year.
And I can’t help but wonder, if the 9ers had the best record in the league, if they wouldn’t have gone ahead and watched them while complaining about Kapernick.
People compromise with stuff they don’t like all the time if it gets them to a larger goal.
When that compromise is not going to get you to your goal, it is a lot easier to make that point of compromise the “straw” that broke the camel’s back.
ZooeyModeratorI think it is generally true that most people rationalize their consciences when money is at stake. One need only take a gander down the list of athletes guilty of despicable things who were hired in spite of those shortcomings to see that.
If Kap doesn’t get picked up, it will be a surprise. He’s certainly a guy that somebody is going to see as a better #2 than what they have on the roster, and someone who might push a weak #1.
But there are a lot of guys out there still unsigned: Cassel, Fitzpatrick, Cutler, Daniel, McCown, Griffin. I dunno. And I think his stance decreased his popularity, especially since owners are conservatives. Woody Johnson supported Trump, fwiw, and while the Jets need a QB….you know…it IS part of the mix.
ZooeyModeratorI would have put Sehorn on that list.
Yeah me too.
And, Eric Hill.
I also wouldn’t have put Finnegan on it or at least not that high. I didn’t like his bush league antics but in 2012 he played effectively. It’s after the injuries that his play declined. A guy can’t help injuries. That was the same story with Jake Long and Scott Wells.
I agree. I considered saying something along the same lines about Finnegan. He was effective his first year, and brought a toughness to the D that it needed. Yeah, he turned out to be a pain in the butt, and he deteriorated after that first year, but he wasn’t the complete mess from the start that other guys on that list were.
ZooeyModeratorI would have put Sehorn on that list.
ZooeyModeratorAnd of course none of that matters since,
A) the Rightwing-Machine will spin the usual BS out into the airways,
and B) the Dems — the opposition party — are dominated by Pro-Corporate
interests themselves.America has become one big-giant-huge “fuck the poor” nation.
I wonder what Jesus would think?
w
v
ZooeyModeratorMany people asked, bewilderedly, “how did this [Trump] happen?” When I suggest it had a lot to do with the 35-year-long decline of incomes of the bottom 60 percent; the growing sense, ever since the Wall Street bailout, that the game is rigged; and the utter failure of both Republicans and Democrats to reverse these trends – they gave me blank stares.
===============There ya go.
w
vWhile the first nine points were interesting, too, it was that same one which caught my eye – for the same reason.
In spite of Sanders and Trump, neither party seems to notice the obvious underlying connection. How dense are they?
March 17, 2017 at 12:00 pm in reply to: White House calls cutting Meals on Wheels 'compassionate' #66378
ZooeyModeratorThe Republican party is just unspeakable. Cutting Meals on Wheels. I mean they just completely lost their moral compass with Newt Gingrich, and the rise of the extremists. Why would Trump even propose this? The money saved by cutting the program is trivial, and furthermore – and more importantly – there is no way it’s going to get cut in the budget that ultimately passes anyway. As completely heartless as the Republicans are, they aren’t going to take the political hit on this for an amount of money that isn’t worth bending over to pick up off the sidewalk. The Freedom Caucus would, and the Rand Paul’s of the world, but this isn’t going to fly ultimately.
I love all the outrage over the proposed cut to Meals on Wheels, but am slightly perplexed at the lack of attention to all the other valuable programs that Trump has suggested eliminating, like the NEA, various grants, $9 billion out of education (13.5% of the fed budget), PBS…it goes on and on. Increases for the “decaying” military which isn’t really decaying as far as anyone can actually see.
And the the Republican health care plan which LITERALLY…LITERALLY…expresses Republican willingness to kill people in order to get yet another tax cut for the richest people on the planet.
WTF is going on? How can these people hold a single seat in government anywhere?
The Democrats are just terrible. Just awful, and incompetent.
Man, I just hate this.
March 17, 2017 at 10:59 am in reply to: will the Bills match the Rams offer to Groy? Turns out…yes (updated 3/16) #66377
ZooeyModeratorVery selfish of Buffalo.
ZooeyModeratorenh.
Seems like a big waste of money. I think they could draft somebody in the 5th round who would produce as much. In fact, I like what they already have on their roster better.
ZooeyModeratorRachel Maddow is becoming must see TV in my household. At least up until Trump gets impeached.
And then we’ll watch the victory laps for a week or two.==========
Enh. Not to me. Shes a
Hillary lover.
And she
probably works for AIPACw
vDitto.
Thought I like the stuff she has done to expose Trump in the past few weeks. I will give her credit for that. But…Rachel is only an occasional ally – a useful character to advance a scene or two, but not the leading lady.
March 15, 2017 at 6:07 pm in reply to: Connor Barwin visited Rams on Wednesday…signs on Thursday #66325
ZooeyModeratorSo…I never saw a projected lineup. Don’t know if I missed it, or nobody has gone that far.
Since they are going to a 3-4…who are the three? Are we thinking LDE tbd, plus Brockers, and Donald at RDE with Quinn as a standup on either side? Who are the DEs?
March 15, 2017 at 11:15 am in reply to: GOP health plan is an act of class warfare by the rich against the poor #66317
ZooeyModeratorIt is such a transparent ripoff, it’s hard to imagine they would propose it seriously. And then, of course, the Freedom Caucus doesn’t think it goes far enough.
I really am fed up with this country. I just do not feel at home in this culture at all. The value system is just completely bankrupt morally and intellectually.
Belligerence and Greed. The American motto.
ZooeyModeratorredundant?
repetitive?
ZooeyModeratorWell, I would call DE a “need.” The stapler they got from Miami is not going to replace Hayes. And Sims is gone.
So they have…a not-quite-himself Quinn…and…Westbrooks. Is Longacre still around? Whatever. That isn’t exactly the bone-crushing excitement I favor from the position.
ZooeyModeratorWonder if Bradford will end his career with the Rams.
March 10, 2017 at 8:26 pm in reply to: tweets on stuff, 3/10 (…actually a lot of interesting stuff here) #66146
ZooeyModeratorWoods says the Rams are young, explosive and speaks to the talent of Jared Goff, says it was an easy decision to come play for the Rams.
Buffalo?

Los Angeles?
ZooeyModeratorWho is Lombardi, and why do I care what Lombardi thinks?
March 10, 2017 at 10:17 am in reply to: Rams cut Barnes, Sims, & Kendricks & trade Hayes…also Watts & Mason #66101
ZooeyModeratorThat surprises me right down the line. It’s not that I don’t think the Rams can upgrade over those players, but they haven’t. So if you don’t have people as good or better lined up, it seems like a loss to cut them. Barnes wasn’t memorable, but he is better than the players behind him.
Hayes I don’t understand. The guy is a pretty good football player, a starting defensive end (or very good depth), and they gave him away. I don’t know what “System fit” means. The guy could rush the QB, and could tackle. I’m sure Wade knows what he’s doing, but I don’t understand this. Now the Rams have Quinn. No Hayes, no Sims, and Westbrook is in trouble. Now they are thin on the DL – which was the team’s strength – and they’re thin at LB, and need help in the secondary.
Kendricks also was no all-pro, but I didn’t see anything from Hemingway or Higbee outside of pre-season.
This just seems to have created a lot more needs in a year with no 1st round pick.
But it’s not the last move, obviously. I sure hope to see some more FA signings, though.
ZooeyModeratorWhitworth seems like a good piece to transition to his successor – who might still turn out to be GRob, but probably someone they draft in the next year or two. Pricey, but I understand that the offense is going nowhere if the line doesn’t improve its performance.
Anyway. I do like the fact that Whitworth has been consistent, and although I’m not a cap guy, it looks like the big cap hit is this year, and the next two years are much cheaper.
It doesn’t seem like the Rams even tried to retain Britt, and I don’t understand that, unless they just felt like they had to place more $ into the OL, and the dropoff between Britt and someone much cheaper isn’t that much.
Woods strikes me as a #2 WR. Heck, iirc, that’s what he was in college.
ZooeyModeratorAnd the environment gets worse every day.
w
vYep.
And we could live through another epoch of brutal dictatorship, of massive inequality, renewed slavery systems, you-name-it. But we cannot survive the destruction of the environment. Cuz we need it to eat, and drink, and breathe.
ZooeyModeratorOne question I have yet to see be discussed is how a billionaire can ethically be a politician in the first place. ..
————–
Yes, of course you are right. And of course its never discussed in the MSM — and if it WERE to be discussed you KNOW how they would ‘discuss’ it — they’d bring in a handful of billionaires and/or CEO’s and/or ‘think-tankers’ and/or other ‘safe’ guests to discuss it.
Its over, Zooey. The scoreboard reads 99 to 1. Bernie being the one.
There is no coming back from 99-1.
I mean there has never been a time when there was MORE information about what was going on. Theres books, films, documentaries, the internet — its all full of accurate information and descriptions of the situation — and….its still…99 to 1. Information no longer matters. Game over. The dems and reps will trade chairs until the end.w
vYes, it’s over. I have to fight the urge to say that in almost every single thread on this board because it’s the bottom line of all of it – climate, banking, energy, voter suppression, you-name-it. It’s over.
FWIW, I’m not sure it’s 99-1. I think Warren might be in there. I am skeptical of her for a reason I haven’t been able to put a finger on, but she fights a good fight, I think. I think Al Franken may be another. I don’t think either one of them is a grifter like Schumer, Pelosi, and…well…all of them, like you say. So it might be 97-3. Which looks better on paper. Sigh.
Greed. It’s what is killing us.
And in America, we have sanctioned greed as a virtue, a public good.
ZooeyModeratorApparently defunding Planned Parenthood is going to be difficult, if not impossible, because Planned Parenthood isn’t an item in the budget. PP gets money from the government only as reimbursement for Medicare covered actions like Pap smears and so forth. Money is already prohibited from going to abortion, so Planned Parenthood gets government money as reimbursement for health care services rendered to patients the exact same way that any other medical clinic does. So you can’t just cut out PP. There would have to be language drawn up for qualifications to receive the reimbursement that would somehow apply only to PP, and good luck with that.
ZooeyModeratorTrump appears absolutely oblivious about the potential ramifications of this which leads me to wonder if he just didn’t make it all up. 10 minutes after tweeting about an alleged wiretap perpetrated against him that if true, would have Watergate-level implications, he was tweeting about how Arnold Schwartnegger was fired from hosting The Apprentice.
Well, I just got up, and I see the WH has denied that there was a court order…so…presumably that story gets confirmed one way or another pretty quickly.
ZooeyModeratorEven then that would make Pence the president. That’s not much better. Unless Pence is implicated. If so that would make Paul Ryan the next in line, and he is unlikely to be implicated in this.
Yes, but it also likely means the end of Bannon, and I think at this point I’d trade Trump and Bannon for Pence. Could also mean the end of Tillerson, and Ross.
-
AuthorPosts

