Stafford ” is not that” lacks ” intangibles”

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Stafford ” is not that” lacks ” intangibles”

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #134237
    joemad
    Participant

    Shannon is finally seeing that Stafford don’t “have it”

    Lumped him with Jeff George, like some of us did when Goff was shipped to Detroit.

    The question is do you still think Stafford is an upgrade?

    BTW, I didn’t think he played that bad yesterday, but he played worse in SF and vs Tenn… I was expecting a win in GB….

    Are the Rams fixable this season?

    I still believe in McVay, …

    #134244
    wv
    Participant

    I disagree. Yes, i think Stafford is a significant upgrade over Goff.

    I say that because of what i saw in the first batch of Ram games.
    So what has happened? Has ‘the real stafford’ shown up?
    Maybe.

    But my own speculation is that
    Stafford is hurt,
    the OLine has not played well and is wearing down,
    Losing Woods was huge,
    Running game is not scaring anyone.

    I mean, we know great QBs can suck when the surrounding pieces
    disintegrate. I watched Russell Wilson a while back and he looked
    absolutely awful. Is he a bum now?

    Having said all that, Im not sure of any of this.
    Its possible Stafford is Jeff George. Could be.
    But at this point, I’m not persuaded.

    w
    v

    #134245
    wv
    Participant

    PS – I do think Stafford is ‘pressing’ a bit. That much seems clear
    to me. But that happens when the wheels start coming off.

    w
    v

    #134246
    Eternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Just focusing on the offense here but Stafford’s first year in it he loses Akers in Camp then Funk Mundt Harris Atwell Woods for the season Skowronek last week after a bye trying to hurriedly implement OBJ and deal with several lingering injuries. Looking at the first 8 games some of the amazing throws that Goff wouldn’t make on his best day. He didn’t suddenly become an awful QB. Late November at Lambeau he lost a 1 possession game to the same Packers team that beat the Cards while down 5 starters.

    #134247
    wv
    Participant

    Just focusing on the offense here but Stafford’s first year in it he loses Akers in Camp then Funk Mundt Harris Atwell Woods for the season Skowronek last week after a bye trying to hurriedly implement OBJ and deal with several lingering injuries. Looking at the first 8 games some of the amazing throws that Goff wouldn’t make on his best day. He didn’t suddenly become an awful QB. Late November at Lambeau he lost a 1 possession game to the same Packers team that beat the Cards while down 5 starters.

    ==========

    Bad news either way.
    If the problem is Stafford, it aint gonna get better.
    If the problem is injuries to Stafford and the Oline, and Woods, Akers, etc,
    that aint gonna get better either.

    At any rate, I love the fact that they finish up against the 49ers.
    I hope both teams need that game to make the damn playoffs.
    Let the rams earn it, If they can, agains the bullies who have
    beat them up five times in a row.

    w
    v

    #134248
    Eternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Is there any other kind of news this season ? We have had so many people out with season ending injuries I can’t remember it being this bad .

    #134249
    Billy_T
    Participant

    I think Stafford has “intangibles” in spades. Very few QBs have ever played with more pain, for instance, and his teammates rave about his dedication and football IQ. He’s Gabe, but a lot smaller. As in, he has no business being as tough as he is, as he’s always been. His arms are even thinner than Goff’s. But that, IMO, may be a fatal flaw. That obstinate belief in his own ability to keep going. He will play through major injuries and refuses to acknowledge that these injuries are screwing with his passing. Throw in another pattern that seems to be emerging, and it has the makings of one of those “perfect storms”:

    McVay doesn’t seem to admit to players being banged up until it’s too late.

    Also: I’m not getting the Jeff George comparisons at all. George had a better arm. Stafford, when healthy, has a really good arm, but it’s not as good as George’s. But George, if memory serves, was a head-case, on and off the field, and that pretty much ruined him. All the “arm talent” in the world, but a head-case.

    That’s not Stafford.

    And all of those team injuries? Freakish for the Rams, based on past seasons. Which makes me think yet again how utterly stupid it was for the players to agree to that extra game. Players have been dropping like flies already this season. The sixteen-game schedule was already too long. And they agree to more? It’s pretty much a given that 17 will lead to 18 all too soon, as you can’t keep going with uneven home and away scenarios. Which means every team is going to have to live with umpteen players on IR. And the Rams are in cap hell for as far as the eye can see, with next to no draft capital . . . .

    Oh, well. Whadyagonnado?

    #134251
    joemad
    Participant

    Maybe, and i emphasize “maybe” Stafford is an upgrade over Goff in a QB competition in Hawaii…….where QB’s throw chalked footballs at huge moving targets strapped to golf carts… but the way Stafford’s accuracy has been the past few months I’m not so sure… just remember that the likes of Jeff Garcia, Chris Simms, and Jim Harbaugh have won those competitions….

    I haven’t seen Stafford impose the will to win when he’s behind in the 4th qtr… he’s 0-4 as a Ram in those instances. That’s a skill that Goff has. Goff has won some very big games as a Ram. Even as a Lion, Goff has put his team in position to win 4-5 games while playing for this generation’s version of Rich Kotite as head coach…

    BTW, did you folks see the Thanksgiving Lions games???? Back-to-back timeouts on the defense resulting in penalty. Holy Smokes!!!

    I think it’s too late for Stafford to acquire the skill to win when he’s back up against the wall… in 13 years of football he’s NEVER done it, even while having an HOF WR for 7 seasons…..

    Do any of YOU honestly think that Stafford would’ve beat New Orleans in 2018?

    #134253
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Joemad,

    I was against the trade from the jump. I thought it was way too much to give up for a QB his age, and I didn’t think the level of upgrade was sufficient to warrant all those picks. I would have preferred it if they had just kept Goff, worked on his throwing motion, and supported him when he was down. Lift him back up. Cuz, given what he had done for the Rams in the past, it had to be mostly an issue of confidence, which McVay wasn’t helping.

    Of course, then you have to go back to the stupidity of that huge contract extension, which was — what? — two years before they had to worry about it? Gurley too. And, all of those picks they gave up to move up to draft him in the first place. I’m a diehard, going all the way back to 1966, but I hate when they botch things like this. Though, I have to admit, when they botch things, they do it with panache!

    ;>)

    Anyway, I think if Stafford is healthy, he’s better than Goff. But he’s not healthy, and he likely has too much wear on his tires to ever be what he once was. I wouldn’t have made the trade**, but I support him now, etc.

    **Maybe Goff and a 3rd. Maybe. Even that might be too much. And Detroit wasn’t going to agree to that, obviously, which would have been just fine with me.

    #134276
    zn
    Moderator

    Jourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
    Most positive dude on planet Von Miller on QB slumps, and what he feels will happen for Matthew Stafford moving forward:

    #134278
    wv
    Participant

    Anybody know exactly ‘what’ injury issues Stafford is dealing with?

    w
    v

    #134279
    Billy_T
    Participant

    WV,

    I haven’t seen any specifics. Just generalized stuff: back pain, ankle, and throwing arm. As mentioned earlier, McVay shows a pattern (to me) of not being all that open with the public about injuries, at least until the cat is out of the bag and he has no other choice.

    Remember the endless dance regarding Gurley? I still don’t know the severity of his many hurts, at least once he entered the NFL.

    I do know that Stafford has a long history of injuries, and playing through them, which go back to his rookie year. No idea about his college injuries, though. But Detroit had a lot of trouble protecting their QB, obviously.

    Bottom line for me: I think McVay is a good coach, and Snead is a pretty good GM. But they have their share of major whiffs, too. I think this trade will end up really hurting the franchise in the long run, along with a series of buy-high, sell-low trades like Peters, Cooks, Watkins, etc.

    #134281
    wv
    Participant

    I haven’t seen any specifics. Just generalized stuff: back pain, ankle, and throwing arm…

    ..Bottom line for me: I think McVay is a good coach, and Snead is a pretty good GM. But they have their share of major whiffs…

    ===

    Well, an injured/beaten-up QB needs a good OLine.

    And the Rams drafted a tutu instead of an OLineman.

    Thats still my biggest gripe this year.

    w
    v

    #134282
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Well, an injured/beaten-up QB needs a good OLine.

    And the Rams drafted a tutu instead of an OLineman.

    Thats still my biggest gripe this year.

    w
    v

    Agreed. It just seemed incredibly self-indulgent. One of those “luxury” picks, when the Rams obviously had holes elsewhere — as you mentioned, especially along the O-line. Plus, inside backer, corner, safety, etc.

    (Creed Humphries, for instance, is playing great football at Center for KC. For what it’s worth, Pro Football Focus has him All-rookie and All-pro as of the midway point this season.)

    Hated the pick. Tutu is a tough little guy, with special speed — though he wasn’t the fastest receiver in this draft. But at 5’8,” 155, he’s just an injury waiting to happen, which, well . . . . And, going into the season, with Kupp, Woods, Jefferson, and Jackson, he was likely 5th on the depth chart. It’s crazy to spend your first pick on someone that far down that chart. Nutz. I could almost see it if he had the makings of a future #1, which was never the case. But, even then, the O-line was a major need this season, especially at center and to replace the 40-year-old Whitworth. It also had ripple effects down draft, as it pushed back depth-picks for all three squads. Special teams, perhaps most importantly.

    I’m guessing McSnead wish they had a do-over on that one.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.