some tweets, 3/6

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle some tweets, 3/6

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #83538
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rich Hammond@Rich_Hammond
    you can say the Rams have a lot of cap room, which they do, but a) so do a LOT of other teams, and b) agents know this and aren’t stupid.

    If you’re the Rams, I don’t think you can risk losing Joyner. You’d prefer not to lose Watkins either, but in 2017 the offense was great with Watkins basically as a speedy decoy. Joyner likely would be tougher to replace at this point.

    Vincent Bonsignore@DailyNewsVinny
    keep in mind #Rams can still negotiate with both players exclusively on long-term deal up until 1 p.m March 14

    Alden Gonzalez@Alden_Gonzalez
    The Rams have placed the non-exclusive franchise tag on S Lamarcus Joyner, which is worth $11.287M. They would still like to keep WR Sammy Watkins, but he’ll at least see what he can get on the free-agent market next week. Rams can still sign Joyner long term. Good thing about his tag is that the value of it is close to the average annual value of what a long-term deal would look like. A team would now have to outbid the Rams and surrender two first-round picks to get Joyner.

    Looking at the list of free agents for a potential Robert Quinn replacement at ROLB, and man, I don’t see many.

    Ryan Kartje@Ryan_Kartje
    This decision could mean a lot of things. Most likely explanation seems to be that the Rams couldn’t lock up Joyner on a long-term deal like they hoped. Didn’t want to lose him in a market where the cap expanded and huge contracts are likely.

    Sammy Watkins, meanwhile, will hit the open market, where he’s likely to command a huge contract. Not sure the Rams would be willing to pay what it would likely cost to retain him. Tough situation, given what they paid for him last fall.

    This could put the Rams in the market for a free agent wideout, but all of them will be very expensive.

    ==

    #83541
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    If you’re the Rams, I don’t think you can risk losing Joyner. You’d prefer not to lose Watkins either, but in 2017 the offense was great with Watkins basically as a speedy decoy. Joyner likely would be tougher to replace at this point.

    That’s what it boils down to, imo. I hope they keep Watkins, but losing Joyner would hurt them more than losing Watkins.

    A year ago, who would have thought that would be said about a WR on the Rams?

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.