Forum Replies Created

Viewing 27 posts - 541 through 567 (of 567 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LaCanfora: Bradford, offense backed by beastly defense #3256
    rfl
    Participant

    Rams brass still can’t believe Donald made it out of the top 10 picks, and look for him to boost to an already powerful group.

    “He’s absolutely a very polished rookie in pass rush,” said Chris Long, a monster pass rusher himself. “One of the most polished rookies I’ve ever seen as far as his technique. Somebody along the line coached him up pretty well. We were sitting in the room the other day watching film, and I said to him, ‘Who taught you to watch film and play with technique?’ Not all kids coming in have that.”

    Donald began turning heads upon his arrival at offseason work, and he hasn’t stopped making jaws drop. He’s been a bear to handle in individual drills, and with Long, Robert Quinn (maybe the game’s best pass rusher) and Michael Brockers around him, this might be the best 4-3 front in the NFL. The scariest part is that none of them has fully reached his prime.

    “He’s been all you could hope for,” Fisher said of Donald. “You always wonder, ‘Well, let’s see what happens when the pads come on.’ He is the real deal. He adds production to an already productive group.”

    This kid is beyond freaking belief. Talent PLUS devotion and effort PLUS veteran-level technique right out of college? Playing next to Quinn? Please!

    If you’re like me, you can’t believe we got this guy.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: LaCanfora: Bradford, offense backed by beastly defense #3253
    rfl
    Participant

    For years the issue was the cast around Bradford, but the upgrades are beyond noticeable now. The offensive line has been fortified through the draft and free agency, with veterans Jake Long, Scott Wells and Rodger Saffold all healthy now (and the hope is they will remain so). There also is no shortage of receivers making plays all over the field at camp, including several with great size. Kenny Britt has people around the team pinching themselves with what he is doing on the field and off, and there is a very strong buzz around third-year receiver Brian Quick and second-year receiver Stedman Bailey. If a few of them can keep it up, this offense has the potential to make significant strides.

    “A few of them really look like they are for real,” said one member of the organization. “If they are, then that’s a major game-changer.”

    This is what Bradford has never had in all his time here. We have never in that time period heard the sort of buzz we are hearing about WRs. SB as the route runner. KB and BQ as the big, slashing, physical guys with downfield speed. (Givens had speed, but never turbo charged it with either physicality or route running.) The sense that we may have guys who can assert themselves.

    Of course, it’s early days. Indeed. Quick may not maintain his confidence in real competition. Britt may flake out. Bailey isn’t available until Week 6. We’ll see.

    But the point made here is spot on. If these 3 guys actually play assertively, then it is a major game changer.

    I’ve said all along that no one can really judge Sam either way until he has a chance to play with WRs who can assert themselves. Well, if these guys change the game, we’ll be able to see. Can he make plays when they are there to be made? Fact is, they have NOT been there to be made to this point.

    But it will also change the game for Tavon. Last year, if he got the ball underneath, he was looking at secondaries that could get away with cheating up. They did not respect our WRs, and therefore they could squeeze him into shrinking space. However, the minute they have to start respecting our WRs, the whole dynamic will change for Tavon. He will have space to run into and will have guys just breaking off from their coverage of other guys. I think it’s quite clear that in such circumstances he will be able to burn people.

    And as we all know, a perimeter passing threat opens things up for the running game as well. You guys know the drill.

    Put it together and you get a 3 tier offensive threat:
    3 Medium to long perimeter passing game
    2 short 1/3 passing game to slots, RBs, and TEs.
    1 Running game

    Because we have not had the top end of the offense, defenses have squeezed our #1 and #2 attacks. Against good NFL defenses, that is not going to work.

    Given a respectable top end, all 3 tiers of the offense can work together to stretch and stress defenses. That will make an enormous difference … if it comes true.

    I think we can trust our OL and RBs to give us a grinding running game. Without the top tier, that will be about it.

    With a respectable top tier and decent pass blocking, our offense can make a major leap forward. We won’t challenge DEN for offensive preeminence. But balanced synergy between the 3 tiers could very well push our passing game into the top dozen while freeing our running game to shine.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by rfl.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    rfl
    Participant

    Does anyone know if the season Rewind package includes Pre-Season games? I intend to get that, and I’d rather not pay twice.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Fisher, 07/31 – transcript #2988
    rfl
    Participant

    Fisher ‘s first mention among receivers? Britt and Quick.

    The HC unthinkingly mentioning these 2 guys who had been major questions …

    This is not just hype. The coaches are seeing these guys as leaders on the receiver corps.

    Amazing development. Potentially transformative.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by rfl.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Day 3 #2741
    rfl
    Participant

    “Do you mean next year? Or for the upcoming year?”

    I mean this year.

    Look, I think Wells is fine … when he’s really healthy. Which has not been much of the time.

    Barnes was a weak link last year.

    If Jones is a bust … man, we have a bad hole at OC. We may have to fill it with an FA signing late in the pre-season.

    And then we need to draft a good center for the long term.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Day 3 #2727
    rfl
    Participant

    On Barrett Jones:

    If he shows nothing this pre-season, then I think the bust label is appropriate. Should be seeing something from an OC by now.

    And if that is so …

    We need a vet to fill the OC hole, given that Wells seems unlikely to remain fully healthy.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Day 3 #2726
    rfl
    Participant

    The thing I have noticed about Robinson is he seems to be a quick learner, they are schooling him at times but they never get away with the same move twice. He almost always comes back stronger on the second rep

    Excellent! All we can ask for at this point.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: OL v DB — Biggest Concern? #2668
    rfl
    Participant

    Wells is a real worry.

    If he is simply being held back as a precaution, OK. He’s an experienced guy and, between two powerful OGs (we have 3 to choose from) I think he’ll be more than fine, calling the rotations.

    If he is really not healthy, then we really only have Jones as a possible plus option. They say he has pumped up, and he certainly smart enough. But there is no earthly way to assess whether he has improved enough to overcome his low level of performance last year.

    Like some other young guys, Jones is a key to our taking the next step. IF he stepped up to match the hopes we had in him, we have a building block for years to come. If not … then we have a big hole we are struggling to fill.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: OL v DB — Biggest Concern? #2665
    rfl
    Participant

    Davin Joseph provides a highly viable option at RG. Saffold is a damn good OL.

    I’ve said before that I don’t buy Long at LOT. I do not trust him to be healthy enough to match his level of play last year. And last year, he struggled at pass blocking.

    P.S.

    I think that the cases of Joseph and Long are worthy of comparison.

    By all accounts, Joseph got hurt, healed up, came back last year, and played poorly for the early part of the season. Then, as he recovered more completely, he played better down the stretch. This early pre-season, Joseph looks as if he is all the way back and ready to play good football.

    OK. I dunno how his injury differs from Long’s. I think they were both knees.

    But it seems to me that we should expect Long to struggle at least for a while recovering. A good deal of it is psychological, a matter of confidence. Here is Long just barely getting the physio OK to play as the season starts. How can he be EXPECTED to not only be able to play, but to play WELL right away?

    And of course as I’ve said before I don’t like Long anyway as a pass blocker. He can run block, but last year, playing “healthy,” he seemed a weak link when we had to throw.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: OL v DB — Biggest Concern? #2663
    rfl
    Participant

    Typo:
    Now, perhaps unlike Anthony, I uncomfortable with that scenario.

    Intended:
    Now, perhaps unlike Anthony, I AM NOT uncomfortable with that scenario.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: vid: interview with Kenny Britt #2662
    rfl
    Participant

    She was actually a good interviewer! Asked decent questions and no lame ones.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: CoachO, Camp Report 7/26/14 + follow-ups #2654
    rfl
    Participant

    on Quick: Again, might just be the most gifted WR on the roster athletically. Size, speed, strength. All there. He is a hard worker, and it has never been said he is a problem. Meaning, he shows up and goes to work. His biggest issue, IMO, is confidence. It’s having the confidence in his own ability to play at this level. And its the coaching staff showing they have the confidence in him to keep putting him out there, even when he makes a mental mistake or drops a pass.

    His body language even at training camp if he drops a ball, looks like he is defeated. He seems to be constantly “looking over his shoulder” wondering what Coach Sherman is going to do or say next. This camp so far, that hasn’t been nearly as evident. Again, does that mean the light bulb has come on? Only time will tell.

    Having Kenny Britt here has already paid dividends as far as Brian Quick’s confidence. They are paired together, and taking reps together. And if you want to find Brian Quick on the practice field, find Britt and he is ALWAYS within a few feet. And Britt is the most spirited player I have seen on the practice field in the past 4 years of attending these practices. He is always encouraging the others in the WR group, but he seems to be giving Quick extra attention. Is that by design? have the coaches put a bug in his ear? Who knows,, but it seems to be working.

    I saw one thing take place in yesterdays 11 on 11 stuff, that I am sure hasn’t taken place before. With Quick lined up wide to the left side, Bradford looked right at him and made a gesture to Quick with his fingers to indicate a sight adjustment. Taking two fingers and putting them to his own eyes while looking at Quick. Immediately after the ball is snapped, Quick runs a quick slant and Bradford hits him in stride for what would have been a 1st down on a 3rd and 5. That tells me he is finally getting it.

    …the prospect of them lining up Britt, Quick, COOK AND KENDRICKS is something they have done more than a couple of times. Pretty impressive when Brian Quick is the “smallest” guy of the group.

    This is extremely interesting stuff regarding Quick. It strikes me as being insightful, a highly plausible reading of the situation. The notion of him dropping his head after a mistake rings true, at least diagnostically.

    Can a guy like that learn confidence? In the competitive crucible of the NFL?

    And what is going on with Britt and Quick? Quick seems to be following him like a scared freshman following a confident senior. And Britt seems to be mentoring him some. What’s in it for a guy like Britt with a history of selfish behavior?

    All fascinating.

    And of course if Britt played up to his previous ceiling and Quick stepped up to begin fulfilling even half his potential …

    Lord, what a difference that would make to our offense!

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Gordon: DB development crucial for Rams #2327
    rfl
    Participant

    Indeed.

    The biggest question mark we face, IMO.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: JT chat #2276
    rfl
    Participant

    Do Britt and Quick both make the roster? When do they accept Pead is a bust?
    by TheLou 2:21 Pm

    Believe so on Britt and Quick. As for Pead, I’m wondering that myself.
    by jthomas 2:21 Pm

    Pead is a strange case to me.

    He has done little to justify his pick so far. He certainly has failed to earn his way onto the field very much. That means he has failed to show the coaches what they drafted him to give.

    That suggests he’s a bust. But, there are 2 complicating issues.

    1st, as I’ve said before, his STs performance last year changes things. You can, after all, survive in the league as a ST specialist. Ask Chase Reynolds. But more than that, his WILLINGNESS to not only play but thrive in that context changes my sense of what he is capable of. I suspect that it has the coaching staff thinking of him differently as well. I think they’ll give him more of a chance this year. I think it is credible to imagine that he might parlay STs performance into a shot at the backfield.

    2nd, he offers a package the others don’t. I don’t see him as a starter running for power on early downs. But, he actually offers the closest thing to a 3rd down specialist role that we have on the roster. He pass blocks well, if I recall, possibly better than t6he others do. His skills as a receiver are probably more advanced. And his running skills fit the 3rd down context. The focus is on the downfield receivers, which can open up some space for a slippery back to exploit. That’s what classic 3rd down specialists do, and I think Pead can probably do that better than any of the others.

    So here’s my deal with Pead. I actually think he would be hard to cut. He gives you special teams. So does Chase. But, unlike Chase, he would be at the least a pretty good emergency RB backup. Imagine a game in which the others got hurt. Pead could probably run with some capability. AND he has the potential to provide the 3rd down role the others probably can’t. He actually could become a vital part of the offense in that role.

    A year ago, I figured he was a bust. Now, I guess I don’t see him that way. He will never be the feature back he was drafted to be. But he actually offers the team quite a valuable package.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: what are the big questions heading into the season? #1723
    rfl
    Participant

    I have 2 big questions.

    1. Do we have the personnel to play the 2ndary?

    2. Can the coaching staff lift this talented team over the hump?

    For me, #2 is THE question of questions. #1 gets answered in large part by #2. Williams needs to turn lots of mostly young talent into an elite defense.

    I think most of us agree that we must become a synergy. I guess that’s always true.

    But the coaching staff is the key to that. Fisher has APPEARED to be a special coach … but has not QUITE gotten over the hump himself. When he came to us he talked about teaching the team to win, and damn if he didn’t do that. Last year, not so much. He HAS to make a difference this year to rise above the challenges of the division and schedule.

    So, for me, those are the question marks. And they are GENUINE question marks. I honestly don’t know if our DBs, DC, or HC are enough to lift us.

    I’m comfortable with the rest of the team.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: from the archive + revised: scouting Tre Mason #1713
    rfl
    Participant

    “RB by committee” …

    Usually a bad sign.

    But in our case, I really like our stable of RBs. Stacy and Mason can rotate and give power. I wonder if Pead could emerge as a 3rd down back. And Cunningham is a dream backup.

    The only problem is that, traditionally, feature RBs need carries in a game to find rhythm and feel. If we rotate too much, they may struggle a bit at that.

    Still, we are DEEP at RB. Love it.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: article projecting 2014 run/pass ratios per team #1652
    rfl
    Participant

    ZN, I think we see this pretty similarly. It makes sense to think of the percentage tipping somewhat toward the passing game, as it is very hard to sustain offense running only.

    I also agree that we won’t necessarily end up with an offense matching SF or SEA. I think we both see Sam as a naturally better passer than either CK or RW. I think our passing game, operating with a legitimate running game, has a higher ceiling than the other 2 offenses have.

    I mean, imagine ZS and TM establishing a serious, on-going threat in the running game. Defenses MUST account for that.

    That would then open up options to pass on first down. And I think Sam operating a play action offense could really hurt defenses, even with limited WRs. I mean, we HAVE seen that with less of a running game and greener WRs. I see no reason why we couldn’t have an above average passing game mixed with a superb running game. And statistically, I think that would lead to stats that favor the passing game even with a really strong ground attack.

    It’s a funny thing about running the ball in the NFL. A consistently effective rushing threat does not have to be effective more than, say, 1/3 of the time. Do that, and it distorts the defense, because the defense struggles to get to 3rd and long. You HAVE to stop the run most of the time to play defense. If you have to make adjustments to get that done, you open up opportunities for the passing game. And the passing game can then begin to kill.

    I return to my point of the other day. Our offense does not have super-studs. But it has the POTENTIAL for a synergy that would be above average. And that would include the passing game making the over on projections from last year.

    I honestly believe we have a higher offensive ceiling than SF or SEA do. But I’m a biased of fart of a Ram fan.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: do running/mobile qbs get sacked more as a rule #1575
    rfl
    Participant

    Just a small point.

    There’s a difference between scramblers who move and then throw and RUNNING QBs who take off to gain yards on their feet.

    My point about QBs is simple: they must be able to beat defenses throwing. Fran Tarkenton–and Wilson?–ran around and then killed you throwing. Marino did it standing tall. The point is … be able to beat a good defense throwing.

    “Running” QBs don’t really believe in the pass and don’t have the patience to learn the reads. When it isn’t there easily, they cut and run. I never believe in those guys. And, yes, it makes sense to me that they would be more susceptible to sacks. A read-and-throw QB can beat the pass rush with 2 steps.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Russ Lande: Rams gamble on Bradford #1574
    rfl
    Participant

    I have said that both the positive and negative views of Bradford have merit in their arguments and the debate can’t be resolved as of now.

    But.

    That doesn’t make Bradford a gamble. We KNOW that he can play solid QB in this league. We KNOW that he can play the position better than do at least a 1/3 of the starters in the league. If he stays healthy, Bradford will surely NOT sabotage a good team’s season.

    One might say that he’s a gamble in terms of potential injury. Many QBs are. One could also say that it was a gamble not to draft a new hope. But not a single QB in the draft this year gave clear indication of offering better than Sam. Drafting one of these guys and cutting/trading Sam … THAT would have been a gamble.

    Here’s my thing about the Sam discussion. It never seems to take into account what he already is … or the fact that he has clearly shown that he can play solid, mid-table QB, making few mistakes and throwing considerably more TDs than picks. Which is a scarce and valuable commodity.

    Sam is constantly evaluated in relationship to the elite level. That’s perhaps inevitable with a #1 overall. But the discussion is always, “will he break out and become an elite QB this year?” And while that question is legitimate, the sole alternative should not be “bust.” Even if the critics are right and Sam turns out not to be elite, he will give you solid and that is not a bust!

    My guess is that the current Ram FO is NOT seeing this as a make-or-break year for Sam. They will, of course, adjust their contract re-negotiations in light of what happens. But I would imagine that they fully expect Sam to have a positive year and that, in that case, the team will do well. If that happens, they won’t be in position to snag an elite QB in the draft. And the way Fish coaches a team, a solid + QB is all he needs to win lots of games. Given a solid year, Sam will be entrenched and established in the team and system and they would re-sign him even if the critics are complaining that he never reached elite status.

    I think the “pressure” on Sam is from outside the organization, and I think it is based on an inability to recognize the value of what Sam has already proven he will give you. He does NOT have to become a Top 5 QB to remain valuable for the Rams for years to come.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    rfl
    Participant

    My beef is describing Kendricks as Cook’s backup.

    They play completely different roles, and Kendricks is probably out there a lot more than Cook. He certainly does more things than Cook does.

    For example, if Tavon runs out on the field, Kendricks keeps the running threat viable. Cook doesn’t.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Breakout player–Offense? #1402
    rfl
    Participant

    PS.–here’s the link: podcast site.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Breakout player–Defense? #1401
    rfl
    Participant

    PS.–here’s the link: podcast site.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Breakout player–Defense? #1399
    rfl
    Participant

    In their Rams Addiction podcasts. I have my phone subscribed to them.

    They are doing a series of Know your Enemy sessions. I listened to the AZ one today, and they first discussed the breakout issue. Haven’t listened to the Whiner show and the SEA one isn’t available yet.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: Optimism? #1279
    rfl
    Participant

    Good points, guys. I think there is a good overview here of team assets.

    I don’t see too much discussion of the opposition, though. I do expect us to be better this year. But better might nevertheless lose ground.

    I guess I’d boil it down to this. I expect us to improve by, say, 2, maybe 3 degrees this year. To post a winning record and/or make the the playoffs, however, we may need to improve by 4 or 5 degrees. It’s a steep up-slope.

    Well, we’ll see.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    rfl
    Participant

    Was thinking about this.

    I don’t see how Cook can be overrated ’cause I don’t think anyone rates him very highly.

    To me, the overrated guy is J. Long. He’s only fair at pass blocking and of course he gets injured a lot. I thought he had a mediocre season at best last year–what he played of it.

    Barksdale is an OK choice, but he is not really outstanding. He’s seen as a weak link when he is probably just competent.

    For my money, the REALLY underrated Ram is Lance Kendricks. People have an idea of the stud TE who is a huge pass receiver. But most of those guys can’t block.

    Kendricks blocks superbly and with great versatility–in-line, wham blocks, etc.

    And, he is an above average pass receiver who makes the occasional big play. (I actually think he could be a more consistent threat if the scheme used him in a different way.)

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: different views of Austin #399
    rfl
    Participant

    I’ll just say this.

    Tavon had trouble in traffic making people miss and creating space.

    Whether that’s because his quickness was exaggerated or he wasn’t up to speed or whatever, I dunno.

    But I saw him fail to escape LBs and other defenders that he “should have” beaten like drums if he were as advertised.

    I don’t despair of him or call him a bust. It seems plausible to me that, as he says, he was overthinking things and not playing at the speed he needs to. I also love his heart and competitiveness.

    But, UNLESS he speeds up and shows more elusiveness than he did last year, he will have to be utilized in a scheme that gives him space to work with. SO far, he isn’t creating it himself.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    in reply to: So, I’m not likeable any more? #254
    rfl
    Participant

    Oz took the buzz down. That means all posts from there go with it.

    Wow. That’s cold.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

Viewing 27 posts - 541 through 567 (of 567 total)